For everyone who keeps up with RON PAUL, JIM ROGERS, PETER SCHIFF and MARC FABER... I always go to financialtruth0.blogspot . com because they post all the latest videos there! Thanks for this video anyway!
The Fed was encouraging borrowing BECAUSE THE ECONOMY CAN NO LONGER GROW BY ANY OTHER MEANS: no new consumer markets (US jobs are overseas), no new labor markets (cheap labor already tapped into fully overseas), no new natural resources (we are depleting existing reserves). Thus the fed created a fake, debt-fueled consumer economy. Now we've tapped out that debt and we are in a depression caused by the destruction of the production-driven economy. Pax Americana is over, like it or not.
I was watching the Maher show last week or the week before and two out of three were economists and the other was a sitting congresswoman, so I find it funny the maher show told Peter they don't want an economic debate with economists on the show. Isn't that what most of Maher's show has been about anyways lately?
It was funny because he had Ron Paul on in the beginning by video and the economists called Ron's views extreme, which I found laughable. The crowd cheered for Paul though.
Watching Maher and his bullshit the past 2 weeks, between Ron Paul and Maxine Waters and Erin Burnett and T Boone Pickens, I was thinking that Schiff was rolling over in his rented house...
Maher has turned away from being the truth seeker that he normally is...would love to see Peter on there making his argument...
The problem with Bill Maher is his liberal/socialist bias. So much so, that I believe the reason he won't have schiff on his show is because of schiffs philosophy on small government and individual responsibility, something Bill Maher can't comprehend. 75% of Bill Mahers philosophy makes complete sense. It's the other 25% that doesn't, because he has to play into the liberal/democrat agenda instead of just saying what makes sense, whether it's considered conservative or liberal.
For example, he blames the downfall of the economy on capitalism and greed and believes that the solution is big government. The truth of the matter is, it was government/fed intervention in the economy that contributed to the massive bubble that got us here in the first place. In a true free market economy, greed is always in balance with fear. That is the natural regulator of the free market. The government/fed essentially made money available for cheap and reduced fear by securitizing debt.
for anyone that keeps up with JIM ROGERS, PETER SCHIFF, MARC FABER and RON PAUL. I always go to financialtruth0.blogspot . com because they post all the latest videos there! Anyway thanks for uploading! Your friend in liberty.
If these corporations like AIG are too big to fail, too secret to fail and overwhelmingly global in structure and operations, why aren't you asking other governments to pitch in with their own rescue packages and tell you what they know? -Ralph Nader
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
The only difference between Stewart/Colbert and the MSM is that they are much more sly in their partisanship.
Stewart called Rick Santelli a "derivatives trader" and implied that Santelli was FOR the bank bailout but against the mortgage bailout.
On both counts, Stewart was a pathetic hack. Santelli is indeed a derivatives trader -- in commodities/currencies/CDs/treasuries, not the "innovative" financial derivatives behind the current crisis.
Warren Buffet is a hack. A shill. During the Campaign, he was in love with Obama and telling us all that he can handle the economy.
Then recently, he spoke about buying mattresses. After Bill Gates dumped his Berkshire stocks, Buffet went on about how our "economy went off a cliff".
Buffett should donate to the people living in Bushville Sacremento.
It doesn't surprise me that Bill Maher doesn't want Peter on. Maher was a hardcore cheerleader for the Clintons up till Barack became the fashion with the Hollywood left and Hillary went out of favor. Yes, Maher a socialist. He is also an avid supporter of Israel and had nothing to say about Israel's recent attack on the Palestineans, though Bill fancies himself a human rights advocate. But watch, he will stop cheerleading for Israel when that also become highly out of style. He's that shallow.
ONLY because Paul is so popular with much of Bill's target audience -- ie. those under 40 who are internet savvy. He does not share Paul's views on foreign policy or economics.
Also, last time Paul was on his show Maher was rather disrespectful to him, especially with his unfunny pot jokes.
I think Maher is afraid to have Schiff on, because Schiff would put him in his place and Maher knows it.
again people, fucking understand that it's NOT maher's decision who's on the show and who isnt, it's his fucked up writers and producers of the show! ! !
not to mention HBO is probably ran by another fucking libral piece of shit
I agree with peter, I also noticed Buffet talking the complete opposite of what I know he does not believe. 6-months ago he was even cheering for the fed which we all know are the real problem. True colors always show in tough economic times. Maybe buffet's true colors are now showing. Maybe he's trying to save face.
You need to add some lights to your videos and to focus the camera lense to the shooting length and light. Several of your videos are out of focus. Bill from LA
Peter is all of a sudden BULL on the dollar for the next 20-30 yrs, are u fucking kidding me!??? Peter told us stock prices are still high and that's true so why put your money in now!??? What bullshit.
For the first time, I hearing some flip/flopping from Peter. ....
Well i watched that too and he was not bullish on the dollar. He was bullish on the market over the next 30 YEARS. He essentially said we are nearing the bottom and that more than likely something will cause the market to turn around eventually.
So yah he is in no way changed any of his positions for the short term, or even the next decade.
Peter understand the fundementals of the economy really well. If you're jumping off a cliff, just because it took 20-30 years for you to reach the bottom, does not invalidate the law of gravity. Look at how long Madoff was able to pull off his ponzi scheme. Doesn't mean madoff critics were wrong. It just took a long term for it to be exposed
I knew that this comment would come up, that is why I asked Peter for permission prior to posting, he said it was fine since others are already posting his Blog videos anyway. Thanks for your comment.
Do the Chinese Barbies have tiny tits?
pretorious700 3 years ago
tiny tits and tight pussy!
yjfoo81 2 years ago
works for me
pretorious700 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For everyone who keeps up with RON PAUL, JIM ROGERS, PETER SCHIFF and MARC FABER... I always go to financialtruth0.blogspot . com because they post all the latest videos there! Thanks for this video anyway!
Justbeatit999 3 years ago
The Fed was encouraging borrowing BECAUSE THE ECONOMY CAN NO LONGER GROW BY ANY OTHER MEANS: no new consumer markets (US jobs are overseas), no new labor markets (cheap labor already tapped into fully overseas), no new natural resources (we are depleting existing reserves). Thus the fed created a fake, debt-fueled consumer economy. Now we've tapped out that debt and we are in a depression caused by the destruction of the production-driven economy. Pax Americana is over, like it or not.
magariqartveli 3 years ago 3
PARASITES! THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THESE BANKS HAVE BECOME! SUCKING VITAL MONEY TO COVER THEIR LOSSES
bad ethics when these bankers come on talk shows and sell the audacity of hope nonsense
madhuradi 3 years ago
Maybe Bill knows there's nothing funny about the economy. I don't know the whole story, I like Bill and I listen to you so I don't know.
VirginiaTagz 3 years ago
the market is up today. You know what that means!!
False confidence.
Here's what you do.
1. Go out and get foodstamps.
2. Use foodstamps to qualify for ARM loan.
3. Take out equity loan to pay off student loans, your taxes, or anything that was sponsored to you by the governmetn.
4. Or you can charge your taxes on Citibank and not pay it off.
5. then sell the house right away.
Take the real estate exam to sell your own house, it's really easy.
if you can't beat them, be them.
therealcaptobvious 3 years ago
I was watching the Maher show last week or the week before and two out of three were economists and the other was a sitting congresswoman, so I find it funny the maher show told Peter they don't want an economic debate with economists on the show. Isn't that what most of Maher's show has been about anyways lately?
It was funny because he had Ron Paul on in the beginning by video and the economists called Ron's views extreme, which I found laughable. The crowd cheered for Paul though.
controlpopulation 3 years ago
Watching Maher and his bullshit the past 2 weeks, between Ron Paul and Maxine Waters and Erin Burnett and T Boone Pickens, I was thinking that Schiff was rolling over in his rented house...
Maher has turned away from being the truth seeker that he normally is...would love to see Peter on there making his argument...
GreenrushCapital 3 years ago
is there a part 2?
EdMan2012 3 years ago
Whaaaat?? I had no idea Bill Maher called himself a libertarian.
Obviously his head is too big to be pulled back out if he thinks Schiff is not "worthy" of his show.
MengersDisciple 3 years ago
Good point Peter Schiff! Curious mystery about Buffet...
Clear analysis about why Bill Maher won't have you on the show. I think your disagreement with Obama is the chief reason.
Enoch2 3 years ago
The problem with Bill Maher is his liberal/socialist bias. So much so, that I believe the reason he won't have schiff on his show is because of schiffs philosophy on small government and individual responsibility, something Bill Maher can't comprehend. 75% of Bill Mahers philosophy makes complete sense. It's the other 25% that doesn't, because he has to play into the liberal/democrat agenda instead of just saying what makes sense, whether it's considered conservative or liberal.
myhipsi 3 years ago
It is quite maddening how dead right on he can be, and how dead wrong he then can be 1 short minute later.
RobTzu 3 years ago
for example?
supersocco 3 years ago
For example, he blames the downfall of the economy on capitalism and greed and believes that the solution is big government. The truth of the matter is, it was government/fed intervention in the economy that contributed to the massive bubble that got us here in the first place. In a true free market economy, greed is always in balance with fear. That is the natural regulator of the free market. The government/fed essentially made money available for cheap and reduced fear by securitizing debt.
myhipsi 3 years ago
for anyone that keeps up with JIM ROGERS, PETER SCHIFF, MARC FABER and RON PAUL. I always go to financialtruth0.blogspot . com because they post all the latest videos there! Anyway thanks for uploading! Your friend in liberty.
Justbeatit999 3 years ago
If these corporations like AIG are too big to fail, too secret to fail and overwhelmingly global in structure and operations, why aren't you asking other governments to pitch in with their own rescue packages and tell you what they know? -Ralph Nader
moreaudan 3 years ago
Great stuff, tough to watch though- bad quality and lips off from words!
escapethecollapse 3 years ago
Maher is corporate mouth piece.
StoneWallD 3 years ago
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
RonRepublican 3 years ago 2
Hey, Peter. You have us. Feel free to skip those fools in MSM.
dlmaniac 3 years ago 2
Of the comedians, Letterman, Maher, Cobert, Stewart.
Only Cobert and Stewart been good, but recently, not sure if its me or him, Stewart seem alot more partisan and less fair
4rcane 3 years ago
stewart just lost a fan by attacking rick santelli
mattgeb84 3 years ago
The only difference between Stewart/Colbert and the MSM is that they are much more sly in their partisanship.
Stewart called Rick Santelli a "derivatives trader" and implied that Santelli was FOR the bank bailout but against the mortgage bailout.
On both counts, Stewart was a pathetic hack. Santelli is indeed a derivatives trader -- in commodities/currencies/CDs/treasuries, not the "innovative" financial derivatives behind the current crisis.
And Santelli was never for ANY bailout. Period.
MengersDisciple 3 years ago
I agree, Stewart was wrong in going after Santelli. He was against ALL bailouts corporate and personal.
controlpopulation 3 years ago 2
Warren Buffet is a hack. A shill. During the Campaign, he was in love with Obama and telling us all that he can handle the economy.
Then recently, he spoke about buying mattresses. After Bill Gates dumped his Berkshire stocks, Buffet went on about how our "economy went off a cliff".
Buffett should donate to the people living in Bushville Sacremento.
therealcaptobvious 3 years ago
Bill Maher is a socialist
4rcane 3 years ago 5
It doesn't surprise me that Bill Maher doesn't want Peter on. Maher was a hardcore cheerleader for the Clintons up till Barack became the fashion with the Hollywood left and Hillary went out of favor. Yes, Maher a socialist. He is also an avid supporter of Israel and had nothing to say about Israel's recent attack on the Palestineans, though Bill fancies himself a human rights advocate. But watch, he will stop cheerleading for Israel when that also become highly out of style. He's that shallow.
LisaJ4Liberty 3 years ago
I wouldn't go that far. Maher had Ron Paul on a couple of times.
nibelungensohn 3 years ago
ONLY because Paul is so popular with much of Bill's target audience -- ie. those under 40 who are internet savvy. He does not share Paul's views on foreign policy or economics.
Also, last time Paul was on his show Maher was rather disrespectful to him, especially with his unfunny pot jokes.
I think Maher is afraid to have Schiff on, because Schiff would put him in his place and Maher knows it.
LisaJ4Liberty 3 years ago
again people, fucking understand that it's NOT maher's decision who's on the show and who isnt, it's his fucked up writers and producers of the show! ! !
not to mention HBO is probably ran by another fucking libral piece of shit
dudebud007 3 years ago
Is Peter Schiff going to be one of the guest on CNN's Money Summit hosted by Ali Velshi soon? He would be an intresting guest.
1tubedout 3 years ago 2
I agree with peter, I also noticed Buffet talking the complete opposite of what I know he does not believe. 6-months ago he was even cheering for the fed which we all know are the real problem. True colors always show in tough economic times. Maybe buffet's true colors are now showing. Maybe he's trying to save face.
controlpopulation 3 years ago
Buffet's turned into a snake oil salesman.
Didn't he invest a lot of money into that hedge-fund-masquerading-as-a-corporation called GE? Those are Peter's words, by the way.
You know what's making Buffet say the things he is saying recently? It sure as hell is not his integrity.
MengersDisciple 3 years ago
Hello Peter:
You need to add some lights to your videos and to focus the camera lense to the shooting length and light. Several of your videos are out of focus. Bill from LA
itillbeme 3 years ago 3
LOL, I thought it was just my eyes, thanks.
motonegros 3 years ago
Peter is all of a sudden BULL on the dollar for the next 20-30 yrs, are u fucking kidding me!??? Peter told us stock prices are still high and that's true so why put your money in now!??? What bullshit.
For the first time, I hearing some flip/flopping from Peter. ....
vinny1010 3 years ago
good point BUT, i mean, of all the advice he's given, he's been a hell of a lot closer to the overall truth than most others....
jusblaze99 3 years ago
I definitely agree with you
vinny1010 3 years ago
Eh... I listened to the whole thing and didn't here him talk about being bullish on the dollar.
burnowan 3 years ago 4
3/9 on Kudlow ... Check it out. It's on YouTube. Others as well as myself were SPEECHLESS!!
vinny1010 3 years ago
Well i watched that too and he was not bullish on the dollar. He was bullish on the market over the next 30 YEARS. He essentially said we are nearing the bottom and that more than likely something will cause the market to turn around eventually.
So yah he is in no way changed any of his positions for the short term, or even the next decade.
burnowan 3 years ago
I was stunned too... but to be fair to Peter, Kudlow cornered him, kept interrupting a descriptive reply by Peter, and was shouting at him:
"long term... one word... yes or no? Yes or no?"
And you can see Peter's hesitation before he said "yes".
This sort of a sound byte can be taken out of context easily... come one now, we have all been through the last few elections.
MengersDisciple 3 years ago
exactly, people need to fucking pay closer attention to what is said! !
dudebud007 3 years ago
Peter understand the fundementals of the economy really well. If you're jumping off a cliff, just because it took 20-30 years for you to reach the bottom, does not invalidate the law of gravity. Look at how long Madoff was able to pull off his ponzi scheme. Doesn't mean madoff critics were wrong. It just took a long term for it to be exposed
4rcane 3 years ago 2
That's cold...taking vids from his very own channel to pad your channel.
eurohim 3 years ago
I knew that this comment would come up, that is why I asked Peter for permission prior to posting, he said it was fine since others are already posting his Blog videos anyway. Thanks for your comment.
PhilDeCarolis 3 years ago
Oh, yay!
eurohim 3 years ago
awesome post Phil, keep them coming!
danbowski40 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1st
nexus411 3 years ago