This video would be more effective if it wasn't wrong. Pounds ARE a unit of force or weight, not just mass. 1 pound of mass IS one pound of weight on earth, a scale using pounds measures weight, which IS correct usage. Newtons are NOT the only correct units. They are the correct SI or metric units.
Congratulations, you managed they imposible. You actually got me to pay atention and take in what was being said when the subject was physics. Unique lecture and very eloquently put.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Unfortunately the juvenile "protest" (wow , a T shirt , that'll get them at YouTube HQ quaking in their boots) rather overshadowed what might otherwise have been an interesting lecture. As for censorship , this isn't a public service , its run by a private company but you still get it for free. Ergo if you don't like their rules then go elsewhere or start up your own service.
centerfuge applies different forces (Centrifugal Force) that acctually causes your body to continue the circular motion, as the force is applied towards the center (which is why you feel like you're "flying" outwards when you swerve in a car, or ride a centrifuge). Weight doesn't have to do with SPEED, it has to do with gravity.
In one system the kilopond is the kilogramforce & the hyl is unit mass (=9.8kg). That is the so-called "gravitational" system. A similar thing w/ foot-pound units. There is one system where the pound is unit mass & the poundal is unit force (=c.1/32 poundforce). In another the pound is unit force & the slug is unit mass (c. 32lb). This slug-pound system is also "gravitational". In short it's a total mess. & then there's those engineers who use kg or lb as both unit mass and unit force :O
You would have to know what the gravity is, and calculate it with a scale. So you see the strength of the force of the "moon tomatoes" (by putting them on the scale) and since you know the gravity force, you calculate the mass from there. There are other ways but this could be the easiest one (if anyone has another idea, feel free to add).
i would never want my boobs that big, because someone wants to cut my nipples so i can become part of the 13 ghost, do you think i want that type of gravity?
lol wtf, i think ive just been sexually harassed over youtube ^^, maybe you should rethink your paedagogical concept if you want the viewer to remember anything later (other than tomatoes maybe)
as an american who was always taught feet and inches, i can visualize feet and inches easily, not so much with centimetres and....whats a metric foot called?
anyway as far as the chest....im gay...so i didnt care...shes right about the science, so cool...and censorship does indeedy suck.....mabey ill post videos on youtube if i ever get a camcorder that works on a computer
your gay!?! wtf you retarded! no one likes you fag! haha you have sword fights with guys what a queer!!! SO SUCK IT!!! oh wait nevermind you probably would.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKs
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKs
you distracted me ;-) Anyways somewhere I had read that the NASA on a mission in collaboration with ESA didnt convert the units in the metric system and the satellite or whatever was that they were doing was lost in space.
very brave video. I have been thinking about the idea that mass and velocity cannot be exchanged, for example in (momentum) p=mv, the mass is never converted into velocity and vice versa, but mass and velocity I think are conserved. I'm not sure velocity is conserved because velocity can be created just from gravitational attraction. How about number of photons as a base unit of matter? How aobut spiral galaxies eventually evolving into globular galaxies?
I think you completely missed the point of the video. If she had said what you said, how long would her breasts have been on the screen? Use your mind.
Absolutely, we should measure weight in Newtons. In 1921, Duncan McDougall preformed an experiment to detect the exit of the soul from the body by detecting the body's loss in weight before and after death. One patient's "delta-weight" was "43 grams."
43g x 9.8 N/g = 421.4N x .225N/lb = 94lbs lost upon death! I highly doubt it.
Yeah it was completely and utterly debunked. There is no such loss of neither mass nor weight after death.
The source of the confusion, i think, lies in the fact that on EARTH, Newtons are 9.8, which is often rounded up to 10, which is just an "added zero", and seems to be less important.
The problems would start (and do now, as we see with NASA's math problems :P ) when we go to other planets, or build stuff for space.
They don't really cheat us when we buy tomatoes. Since we are all on Earth, 1 kg of mass will allways have weight of 9.8 N (in metric units) or 2.2 lb. (in english units).
So are you saying that when we buy tomatoes at stores (mind you that I do recognize that, thats not the point you were making) they are in fact cheating us, in making us think that we are getting more if it weight more? Or am I missing a factor (variable)?
yes, I understand that (though, in english, it's a bit mixed up as well, only the other way around, 'pound' is used for mass sometimes) -- but i accept the correction, and added it a while ago to the comment tab at the right side :)
So basically; The same object will have a different weight on different planets, or in space. But the mass remins constant (Unless something happened to the object while being transported).
Precisely. Mass is the AMMOUNT of matter in an object. Weight is the result of the force activated on it (Gravitation).
On earth, gravity is ALMOST 10 (9.8) so instead of saying "1 kilo mass and 10 newton weight" we just say 1 kilo is both mass and weight. People make it easy, but it doesnt mean it's true :)
I got about 1:47 into the video and suddenly I went deaf. i don't understand it. My vision was still working fine, but I suddenly couldn't hear a damn thing.
Hahaha... I was tempted to show my crotch in a video response, but I figured after measuring my mass in kilos (or pounds), you might think I lived on the moon. When you said "Allow me to elaborate", I thought your top was coming off! lolol (nice job)
OMG <3 Not for the breasts or nothing, but i've yet to see a woman who actually takes a liking to astronomy not only that, your freaking lecturing it to people keep em coming you got a subby:)
Ever see Christians trying to use Einstein and time dilation to reconcile the disparity between 6000 years and 13.7 billion? Their astronomical pretzeling is even more entertaining than their efforts towards biology.
Firstly, it is WAY more because string theory and imaginary time make mathematical sense, using (they don't use the theory, they just say the word relativity because they don't know how to use the theory) relativity to claim to claim a young earth does NOT make mathematical sense, it's BACKWARDS, and wrong. Plus scientists don't base their lives on thse things and rationalize them later, they are searching for truth, not trying to justify the fantasies of their forefthers.
Ever see the atheist trying to use imaginary time to reconcile the discrepency of the obvious fact that the universe had a beginning with their preconceived prejudices? Their astronomical pretzeling is even more entertaining than their efforts toward dismissing CSI (Complex Specification Information) or Intelligent Design;-)
You said " No more than string theory, or Hawkings imaginary time." which is nonsense because those things work out mathematically, while the creationist use of relativity is backwards. So you avoided that and just repeated what I said. So I'll just say this, it's the scientists who are making progress, not the theologians. And there is no incentive to be an atheist, unless you count the lack of fear from imaginary threats.
Many things that have "worked out mathematically" laterare not acccepted as the way things are. Einstein belived in a steady state universe. A steady stste universe can be expalined mathmatically it does not make it true. My only point is that the evidence points to a beginning but science is frantically trying to avoid the obvious.
Einstein had to insert a cosmological constant to make his model steady and he called it the biggest bluner of his career. Your point was that creationism misuse of relativity was on par with modern theoretical physics. NOBODY asserts string theory as fact anyway, it's just a BRILLIANT mathematical possibility as opposed to a completely unreasonable, insensible, abandonment of logic like saying relativity reconciles a young earth with the evidence.
Are you talking to me? I was talking about how some creationists use the malleability of time to reconcile 13 billion year old light with a 6000 year old universe. They claim when we see distant galaxies, we're looking into the future which is backwards. This guy kelark tried to compare that egregious misuse of the human mind with mathematical endeavors like string theory. After I fell out of my chair, I committed the cardinal sin, "thou shalt not discuss science with creationists".
Over the last 100 years "science" has claimed the universe to be 75,000 years old, 240 milion, 2.4 billion, 5 billion, 10, 12, 14 etecetra etcetera. I never said I wasw a creationist. I am only reacting to your certainty in the face of uncertainty
Bullshit, I made a simple comment that claiming the earth is young because of relativity was retarded and you show compare that special brand of idiocy with string theory. Now you appear to making what point? That because science actually LEARNS and refines itself that 6000 years is not a number beyond all reasonability?
I don't believe the 6000 years figure. However i did hear a briliant man Schroeder describe how using relativity that 6000 years and 13 billion could happen simultaneously. It was not stated as fact rahter it was a brilliant mathematical possibility as opposed to the completely unreasonable, insensible, abandomnet of logic like saying imaginary time reconciles a crated universe with an infinte one.
See what I mean, you're comparing creationism with Hawking. What a useless response, like your last few. Do you now completely back off your original assertion?
I think you miss point. Since when is using a theory(reletivity) to falsify or confirm another theory (6000 year universe) a misuse of science. I thought that was science. The only compariosion I am making are that both are making wild unsupported speculations based on very little demonstrable science. Hawking is a litlle more humble about his postulations than you are about his postulations.
"I think you miss point. Since when is using a theory(reletivity) to falsify or confirm another theory (6000 year universe) a misuse of science. I thought that was science." OMG, they don't UNDERSTAND the theory and they are MISusing the theory. They think it works BACKWARDS and OUT OF PROPORTION than it really does. You are so full of shit it's not funny. One is mathematical investigation, the other is clear example of someone not understanding what they are saying.
Falsify the claim rather than pretending to know something. If they are misusing it demonstrate it. You seem to like to avoid the issue, I don't know if you are dense or are afraid to face the facts. Whichever it is it is sad that your God is so weak. Relativity of simultaneity: two events that appear simultaneous to an observer A will not be simultaneous to an observer B if B is moving with respect to A. I suppose you have a problem with taht as well?
Time dilation — the time lapse between two events is not invariant from one observer to another, but is dependent on the relative speeds of the observers' reference frames (e.g., the twin paradox which concerns a twin who flies off in a spaceship travelling near the speed of light and returns to discover that his twin has aged much more).
"Falsify the claim rather than pretending to know something." You know what, I just heard a guy on youtube named VenomfangX say relativity reconciles it and I immediately thought "this guy has it backwards". For your benefit I looked up the official YEC position on it and I was blown away. The YEC claim is WAY crazier than I thought. It assumes the earth is in the center of the newlyy created universe resting at the bottom of a huge gravity well. LOL
This claim can be falsified in a number of ways. How many different ways do you want me to falsify this claim? All they did was say "gravity distorts time, lets pretend there's a gazillion times more gravity". If we sat in one of these silly gravity wells, distant galaxies would be BLUE shifted. Our sun is at least a second generation star, meaning entire stars would have had to have gone nova first, to account for all the heavy elements in the solar system. Want more?
Let me put it into simple terms you can understand. If someone believes the scriptures then it would be natural to try and determine if the observations in nature match the scripture. It is science to start with a hypothesis and try to confirm it or falsify it. Just because you have a preconception, that does not make the application of scientific methodolgy a "wrong misuse of science" it is science. Rather than dismiss them out of hand prove them wrong.
"If someone believes the scriptures then it would be natural to try and determine if the observations in nature match the scripture". Natural human behavior isn't always scientific. Do you believe the scriptures? Talking snakes, people living inside of whales, virgin births, resurrections? If one thinks these claims make sense, then evidence contradicting, universal gravity wells might not sound retarded. To bad cosmology almost (accept religious folk) universally rejects it as worthless.
"try and determine if the observations in nature match the scripture" But that's not even close to what they do. They don't check to see if they match, they reject anything that doesn't match and twist some select nonsense into neat little packages that predisposed religious folk will eat up. That's why they peddle their crap in red state public school boards and not in the free market of scientific scrutiny, where it fails miserably.
Who is the one rejecting? I personally have seen someone pronounced dead be resuscitated, virgin birth is clearly possible with in vitro fertilization, there have been modern instances of men being swallowed by sperm whales and surviving. I sure hope that not all scientists start out with your premise of
1) That's not even close to the resurrection I was talking about.
2) Nor is that the virgin birth.
3) If you believe those "modern" whale stories then you're even more gullible then I thought. The guy's wife admitted it was a lie.
So you do believe the magical nonsense in the bible as literal history? Do you back away from your earlier comparison of evidence contradicting, apologetic gravity wells and string theory?
If Hawking turns out to wrong about lets say Imaginary Time would it be fair to call his theory idiotic?
Another question would it be possible for an event lets say creation to be have a time a differnt duration based upon the location of those observing such an event?
"If Hawking turns out to wrong about lets say Imaginary Time would it be fair to call his theory idiotic?" No.
"Another question would it be possible for an event lets say creation to be have a time a differnt duration based upon the location of those observing such an event?" Not nearly that different.
"No but they are possible." Not through nature. Supernatural magic is required.
This has to be one of the strangest vids i've ever watched, I was listening to a lecture about mass and weight with giant tits in my face. If only science class was like this..
after watching this video the only thing i got outta it was "mooeypoo can fit a 10 word sentence across her chest" I'm not sure what the purpose of this was. Weather it was to educate or to distract with breast...I donno
Kind of ironic that the words on your shirt are actually censored in your protest against censorship...
If anyone doesn't understand the difference between mass and weight, I wonder how they managed to pass 4th grade science. I weep for the state of education.
I heard something about mass and weight at the beginning and about anangel13's removed video then it was just "*indiscernable* tomatoes.... *indiscernable*" It's probably youtube up to their censorship tricks, what an outrage.
Hmmm, great vid. I think if you use a bascule for measuring, you'll measure mass. 5 Kg of tomatoes over here will be 5 Kg of tomatoes on the moon. The problem began when whe started measuring with springs
Mass is constant, regardless of where you are, but weight is just a measuring system. If you're on the moon, you weigh less, but your mass is the same. Very nice T-Shirt, by the way.
Great video!! I have just one question: I was always taught that pounds were a unit of weight and slugs were the corresponding unit of mass. Have I been deceived?? :)
Okay, I am mainly talking about the metric system, but I will have to do more thorough research into it to answer about the American units.. I've seen conflicting sources, so I don't want to mislead you. I'll check it out. :)
The metric system is so much easier I just wish everyone would use it.
Is there a way to measure mass directly or are you always required to use force? For example you can measure the force of attraction between two objects (one know mass, the other unknown) and work Newton's equations backwards but I want to know if there is way to do it directly.
You always need to deduce it from other variables if it's unknown. Simple harmonic motion is another good way of finding mass, where you'd just have to measure the period of oscillation.
Pounds are a unit of weight indeed! I say weight, they're a unit of any force, just like newtons. A good way of seeing this is to consider the units of pressure. It is still common to measure pressure in psi, or pounds per square inch (blatent imperialism), whereas it's metric counterpart is the pascal, or newton per square metre.
Killograms, pounds, etc, are, scientifically, measures of mass. The two are only the same on Earth, because mass is based on how much that object weighs on Earth gravity. Scientinically, newtons are used as a measure of weight (If I'm not mistaken, a Newton = the weight on an apple)
I think censorship on youtube has reached ludicrous proportions. They're yanking videos of women with barefeet because the foot-fetish crowd was getting off on them. They yanked videos of women with hairy armpits (don't know what that was about). My video, "Why is Sex a Sin?" has been flagged, Gisbourne's video showing embarrassiing quotes from the Quran have been yanked.
Is there any other vid site that is more open to free speech? Maybe free-thinkers should do a mass exodus?
I don't know. It really pisses me off that youtube is caving into censorship. Why?!? I can see people threatening to leave over a video they abhor... but all they have to do is not click on it. Censorship limits everyone. Grrrr.
Those are massive! What do they weigh?
ConnecticutSavvy 11 months ago
wow, my two favorite things all in one video...
notcool2112 1 year ago
This video would be more effective if it wasn't wrong. Pounds ARE a unit of force or weight, not just mass. 1 pound of mass IS one pound of weight on earth, a scale using pounds measures weight, which IS correct usage. Newtons are NOT the only correct units. They are the correct SI or metric units.
HypnoGyrl 1 year ago
Comment removed
HypnoGyrl 1 year ago
Comment removed
HypnoGyrl 1 year ago
Great vid. Perfect mass, cute and SMART.
TheJflow008 1 year ago
titties say what....
MegaJeremy07 1 year ago
BOOOOOBIESSS!!!!!!!!!!!
meone0 2 years ago
We owuld like to listen to your face not your chest -.-^
TaegenProductions 2 years ago
G33|{
TaegenProductions 2 years ago
this clearly shows the effect of the female form on the male mind.
draconiandevil01 2 years ago
Bozhe moi! you are hot. Teach me baby.
soyuz27 3 years ago
she was sexi
101savage 3 years ago
I'm sorry, I couldn't focus on what you were saying.
TomSFox 3 years ago
How much would you weigh on the Moon ?
hollow0rld 3 years ago
Which moon? On Luna I would weigh only eight pounds; however on Europa, a moon of Jupiter, I would weigh about only six pounds!
VenomFangXD 3 years ago
what?
CharlesRClayton 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
she bored me for 9:04 and didnt even flash her boobs at the end!
gavinwales06 3 years ago
wish my teacher could've done this instead.
IvoryAgent 4 years ago
LOL
TaegenProductions 2 years ago
I... Love... You.
oftignorant 4 years ago
Muy interesante y muy creativo el video
rius64 4 years ago
Brilliant... I watched the whole video!
phxariz85020 4 years ago
Congratulations, you managed they imposible. You actually got me to pay atention and take in what was being said when the subject was physics. Unique lecture and very eloquently put.
AmberNightwolf 4 years ago
that was one hot lecture
=]
rjohnson1984 4 years ago
This is how to do a physics lecture and hold your audience's attention.
We need more lady physics teachers.
I thought you had a vague resemblance to the actress America Ferrara. I know you do now:D
ChrisJMoor 4 years ago
I Surrender!
msginca 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Unfortunately the juvenile "protest" (wow , a T shirt , that'll get them at YouTube HQ quaking in their boots) rather overshadowed what might otherwise have been an interesting lecture. As for censorship , this isn't a public service , its run by a private company but you still get it for free. Ergo if you don't like their rules then go elsewhere or start up your own service.
boltar2003 4 years ago
Yeahm, that doesn't mean we can't make a statement about it.
and this lecture is about known subjects (relatively) so I didn't think it is THAT bad if people uhn... "spaced out" during it :P
mooeypoo 4 years ago
So when you ride a centerfuge on earth it can reduce your weight depending on how fast it spins?
atom2009 4 years ago
centerfuge applies different forces (Centrifugal Force) that acctually causes your body to continue the circular motion, as the force is applied towards the center (which is why you feel like you're "flying" outwards when you swerve in a car, or ride a centrifuge). Weight doesn't have to do with SPEED, it has to do with gravity.
mooeypoo 4 years ago
In one system the kilopond is the kilogramforce & the hyl is unit mass (=9.8kg). That is the so-called "gravitational" system. A similar thing w/ foot-pound units. There is one system where the pound is unit mass & the poundal is unit force (=c.1/32 poundforce). In another the pound is unit force & the slug is unit mass (c. 32lb). This slug-pound system is also "gravitational". In short it's a total mess. & then there's those engineers who use kg or lb as both unit mass and unit force :O
BryanAJParry 4 years ago
that was half the point though :P tribute against censorship with a censored shirt! :P hehe
mooeypoo 4 years ago
So if i found tomatoes on the moon how would i measure the mass!?
hohollyho 4 years ago
You would have to know what the gravity is, and calculate it with a scale. So you see the strength of the force of the "moon tomatoes" (by putting them on the scale) and since you know the gravity force, you calculate the mass from there. There are other ways but this could be the easiest one (if anyone has another idea, feel free to add).
mooeypoo 4 years ago
so if i found some tomatoes on the moon how would i measure the mass!?
hohollyho 4 years ago
Lovely tits.
RossPK81 4 years ago
i would never want my boobs that big, because someone wants to cut my nipples so i can become part of the 13 ghost, do you think i want that type of gravity?
scottygulik 4 years ago
No offense but it shouldn't take you 9 minutes to explain the difference between weight and mass.
Mass - A measurement of matter
Weight - A force on a mass due to gravity
That should save you some time.
tsnCosmos 4 years ago
lol wtf, i think ive just been sexually harassed over youtube ^^, maybe you should rethink your paedagogical concept if you want the viewer to remember anything later (other than tomatoes maybe)
random0815 4 years ago
OGTronn, shut up. Why the heck are you asking for her to show her brests to you? Get a life sicko...
Lordwhite24 4 years ago
as an american who was always taught feet and inches, i can visualize feet and inches easily, not so much with centimetres and....whats a metric foot called?
anyway as far as the chest....im gay...so i didnt care...shes right about the science, so cool...and censorship does indeedy suck.....mabey ill post videos on youtube if i ever get a camcorder that works on a computer
alejandrox3 4 years ago
your gay!?! WTF!! no one likes you! SO SUCK IT!!!!! oh wait nvm you actually might
lrdkazul 4 years ago
your gay!?! wtf you retarded! no one likes you fag! haha you have sword fights with guys what a queer!!! SO SUCK IT!!! oh wait nevermind you probably would.
lrdkazul 4 years ago
Hey, If you want to preach about censorship, show me your tits. Fatass.
OGTronn 4 years ago
Troll. Reported.
mooeypoo 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKs
lousith 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
put this on 4 video comments within 15 mins,if u do, sum one u love will surprise u sum how!! If u don't , u will lose ur love
eldari93 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKs
ladysman99 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1-say a boyor girls name want 2 be with 2 times
2-say ur best friends nasme 5 times
3-post this comment on 5 vids
4-press f8
5-u will see ur crushes name
Scaryh8su 4 years ago
haha i like weight and mass...or do I? yeah I definately do!
AandAProd 4 years ago
for some reason I couldn't follow you...
you distracted me ;-) Anyways somewhere I had read that the NASA on a mission in collaboration with ESA didnt convert the units in the metric system and the satellite or whatever was that they were doing was lost in space.
libertarian 4 years ago
It was the mars rover, and it was ALMOST destroyed, yes. And it wasn't the first time, either. Hubble got a similar stroke of bad conversion.
America should join the world and practice the metric system already. Geesh :P
mooeypoo 4 years ago
More videos. Less shirt.
TruthDevours 4 years ago
mmmm boobies! I don't get it, can hold the mass? Maybe that will help me understand!
blaster21996 4 years ago
very brave video. I have been thinking about the idea that mass and velocity cannot be exchanged, for example in (momentum) p=mv, the mass is never converted into velocity and vice versa, but mass and velocity I think are conserved. I'm not sure velocity is conserved because velocity can be created just from gravitational attraction. How about number of photons as a base unit of matter? How aobut spiral galaxies eventually evolving into globular galaxies?
tedhuntington 4 years ago
Even in the beginning while you're still sitting down, you look really good in this video. I don't know if it's the hair or the collar or what.
dechha1981 4 years ago
I like the effect of gravity on your objects! Sorry, just had to say it ;) Very interesting clip.
therealneurox 4 years ago
THIS IS EDUCATION!!! =D
kyodarkfire 4 years ago
silly me i thought mass was the density of an object within specific boundaries , where weight was the force of gravity placed on that object ,
STRESSED999 4 years ago
MMM this sounds way too simple STRESSED999, Mooo likes to go round and round in circles so she doesnt really explain anything.
kingsizecobber 4 years ago
i'm quit slow
STRESSED999 4 years ago
I think you completely missed the point of the video. If she had said what you said, how long would her breasts have been on the screen? Use your mind.
DickJohnson3434 4 years ago
i'll have another joint ,it will all seem like a bad dream
STRESSED999 4 years ago
I like your 1 kg of tomatoes :) .. Funny, that I looked up that exact same question of mass/weight yesterday LOL
thaevilpimp 4 years ago
Excellent explanation. Also nice pair of newtons. Would like to see more.
nothankyoumam 4 years ago
m = E/C^2
theMello99 4 years ago
You remind me of this great girlfriend I had in the 5th grade. She was a real science nerd, I loved her brain!
jungletekno 4 years ago
I figure that having boobs on the screen must have made the subject seem harder for non initiated to basic physics! :o) Good video though!
Mickeygallo 4 years ago
Absolutely, we should measure weight in Newtons. In 1921, Duncan McDougall preformed an experiment to detect the exit of the soul from the body by detecting the body's loss in weight before and after death. One patient's "delta-weight" was "43 grams."
43g x 9.8 N/g = 421.4N x .225N/lb = 94lbs lost upon death! I highly doubt it.
Retrovertigo26 4 years ago
Oops. I screwed up my units.
.043kg x 9.8 N/kg = .4214N
.4214N x .225N/lb = .094lbs lost upon death.
Eh, I still think it's a bunch of crud, because follow up experiments never replicated McDougall's findings.
Retrovertigo26 4 years ago
Yeah it was completely and utterly debunked. There is no such loss of neither mass nor weight after death.
The source of the confusion, i think, lies in the fact that on EARTH, Newtons are 9.8, which is often rounded up to 10, which is just an "added zero", and seems to be less important.
The problems would start (and do now, as we see with NASA's math problems :P ) when we go to other planets, or build stuff for space.
mooeypoo 4 years ago
Actually, that was proven to be bogus :)
Good point, though, nevertheless :)
mooeypoo 4 years ago
Wow! What a mass :D
Your sense of humor _must_ be appreciated! I wish i could hold 'em...
YaniMan 4 years ago
Nice Tomatoes jk :)
cjunk351 4 years ago
They don't really cheat us when we buy tomatoes. Since we are all on Earth, 1 kg of mass will allways have weight of 9.8 N (in metric units) or 2.2 lb. (in english units).
zagiyu 4 years ago
I didn't say they cheat, I said we don't use the right terminology.
mooeypoo 4 years ago
So are you saying that when we buy tomatoes at stores (mind you that I do recognize that, thats not the point you were making) they are in fact cheating us, in making us think that we are getting more if it weight more? Or am I missing a factor (variable)?
Quocorya 4 years ago
Pound is actually unit of force. English unit for mass is slug. :)
zagiyu 4 years ago
yes, I understand that (though, in english, it's a bit mixed up as well, only the other way around, 'pound' is used for mass sometimes) -- but i accept the correction, and added it a while ago to the comment tab at the right side :)
mooeypoo 4 years ago
pound is actually measure of weight. The english unit for mass is slug :)
zagiyu 4 years ago
BB -ountiful BB -eauty
May you always be your own master of the Law of Levity.
Atlantist 4 years ago
GREATESS COMMENT EVAR!!!
Quocorya 4 years ago
Nice... T-shirt :)
So basically; The same object will have a different weight on different planets, or in space. But the mass remins constant (Unless something happened to the object while being transported).
dechha1981 4 years ago
Precisely. Mass is the AMMOUNT of matter in an object. Weight is the result of the force activated on it (Gravitation).
On earth, gravity is ALMOST 10 (9.8) so instead of saying "1 kilo mass and 10 newton weight" we just say 1 kilo is both mass and weight. People make it easy, but it doesnt mean it's true :)
mooeypoo 4 years ago
I got about 1:47 into the video and suddenly I went deaf. i don't understand it. My vision was still working fine, but I suddenly couldn't hear a damn thing.
bryantulsa 4 years ago
That's the most pleasant physics lesson I've ever had. You're brilliant. :)
jergsden 4 years ago
...i thought u were a dude (up until i saw this video) BARRRRF
teodor1010 4 years ago
My two favorite things, astronomy and breasts, I just had to subscribe!
DickJohnson3434 4 years ago
This video was a serious exercise in multitasking.
HopefullyUnexpected 4 years ago
Hahaha... I was tempted to show my crotch in a video response, but I figured after measuring my mass in kilos (or pounds), you might think I lived on the moon. When you said "Allow me to elaborate", I thought your top was coming off! lolol (nice job)
VimisiDigitalMedia 4 years ago
Brainy chicks are sexy. 5 stars...subscribed.
supernova8370 4 years ago
You are my new hero.
OshunAvani 4 years ago
Ok I've watch until the end... What was the difference again?
wolfganglui 4 years ago
NICE SHIRT
dankwilliams 4 years ago
Good vid, just next time coulod just wear a bra? please. lol
peace
cjunk351 4 years ago
OMG <3 Not for the breasts or nothing, but i've yet to see a woman who actually takes a liking to astronomy not only that, your freaking lecturing it to people keep em coming you got a subby:)
bankeh 4 years ago
I must say your distinctions between mass and weight were a bright ray of sun on an otherwise cloudy day ;)
Astrosteed 4 years ago
Yes! You should do every video like this. Except with less clothing. Dancing. Wildly.
galviancrush 5 years ago
I noticed that your other videos don't have as many views as this effort. You may want to crack out that t-shirt again ;-)
kelark 5 years ago
yeah I just noticed that too.. How wonderful, people ACTUALLY like physics!
:P
mooeypoo 5 years ago
Ever see Christians trying to use Einstein and time dilation to reconcile the disparity between 6000 years and 13.7 billion? Their astronomical pretzeling is even more entertaining than their efforts towards biology.
Savagery34 5 years ago
No more than string theory, or Hawkings imaginary time.
kelark 4 years ago
Firstly, it is WAY more because string theory and imaginary time make mathematical sense, using (they don't use the theory, they just say the word relativity because they don't know how to use the theory) relativity to claim to claim a young earth does NOT make mathematical sense, it's BACKWARDS, and wrong. Plus scientists don't base their lives on thse things and rationalize them later, they are searching for truth, not trying to justify the fantasies of their forefthers.
Savagery34 4 years ago
Ever see the atheist trying to use imaginary time to reconcile the discrepency of the obvious fact that the universe had a beginning with their preconceived prejudices? Their astronomical pretzeling is even more entertaining than their efforts toward dismissing CSI (Complex Specification Information) or Intelligent Design;-)
kelark 4 years ago
You said " No more than string theory, or Hawkings imaginary time." which is nonsense because those things work out mathematically, while the creationist use of relativity is backwards. So you avoided that and just repeated what I said. So I'll just say this, it's the scientists who are making progress, not the theologians. And there is no incentive to be an atheist, unless you count the lack of fear from imaginary threats.
Savagery34 4 years ago
Many things that have "worked out mathematically" laterare not acccepted as the way things are. Einstein belived in a steady state universe. A steady stste universe can be expalined mathmatically it does not make it true. My only point is that the evidence points to a beginning but science is frantically trying to avoid the obvious.
kelark 4 years ago
Einstein had to insert a cosmological constant to make his model steady and he called it the biggest bluner of his career. Your point was that creationism misuse of relativity was on par with modern theoretical physics. NOBODY asserts string theory as fact anyway, it's just a BRILLIANT mathematical possibility as opposed to a completely unreasonable, insensible, abandonment of logic like saying relativity reconciles a young earth with the evidence.
Savagery34 4 years ago
...this made no sense. What?
mooeypoo 4 years ago
Are you talking to me? I was talking about how some creationists use the malleability of time to reconcile 13 billion year old light with a 6000 year old universe. They claim when we see distant galaxies, we're looking into the future which is backwards. This guy kelark tried to compare that egregious misuse of the human mind with mathematical endeavors like string theory. After I fell out of my chair, I committed the cardinal sin, "thou shalt not discuss science with creationists".
Savagery34 4 years ago
Over the last 100 years "science" has claimed the universe to be 75,000 years old, 240 milion, 2.4 billion, 5 billion, 10, 12, 14 etecetra etcetera. I never said I wasw a creationist. I am only reacting to your certainty in the face of uncertainty
kelark 4 years ago
Bullshit, I made a simple comment that claiming the earth is young because of relativity was retarded and you show compare that special brand of idiocy with string theory. Now you appear to making what point? That because science actually LEARNS and refines itself that 6000 years is not a number beyond all reasonability?
Savagery34 4 years ago
I don't believe the 6000 years figure. However i did hear a briliant man Schroeder describe how using relativity that 6000 years and 13 billion could happen simultaneously. It was not stated as fact rahter it was a brilliant mathematical possibility as opposed to the completely unreasonable, insensible, abandomnet of logic like saying imaginary time reconciles a crated universe with an infinte one.
kelark 4 years ago
See what I mean, you're comparing creationism with Hawking. What a useless response, like your last few. Do you now completely back off your original assertion?
Savagery34 4 years ago
I think you miss point. Since when is using a theory(reletivity) to falsify or confirm another theory (6000 year universe) a misuse of science. I thought that was science. The only compariosion I am making are that both are making wild unsupported speculations based on very little demonstrable science. Hawking is a litlle more humble about his postulations than you are about his postulations.
kelark 4 years ago
"I think you miss point. Since when is using a theory(reletivity) to falsify or confirm another theory (6000 year universe) a misuse of science. I thought that was science." OMG, they don't UNDERSTAND the theory and they are MISusing the theory. They think it works BACKWARDS and OUT OF PROPORTION than it really does. You are so full of shit it's not funny. One is mathematical investigation, the other is clear example of someone not understanding what they are saying.
Savagery34 4 years ago
Falsify the claim rather than pretending to know something. If they are misusing it demonstrate it. You seem to like to avoid the issue, I don't know if you are dense or are afraid to face the facts. Whichever it is it is sad that your God is so weak. Relativity of simultaneity: two events that appear simultaneous to an observer A will not be simultaneous to an observer B if B is moving with respect to A. I suppose you have a problem with taht as well?
kelark 4 years ago
Time dilation — the time lapse between two events is not invariant from one observer to another, but is dependent on the relative speeds of the observers' reference frames (e.g., the twin paradox which concerns a twin who flies off in a spaceship travelling near the speed of light and returns to discover that his twin has aged much more).
kelark 4 years ago
"Falsify the claim rather than pretending to know something." You know what, I just heard a guy on youtube named VenomfangX say relativity reconciles it and I immediately thought "this guy has it backwards". For your benefit I looked up the official YEC position on it and I was blown away. The YEC claim is WAY crazier than I thought. It assumes the earth is in the center of the newlyy created universe resting at the bottom of a huge gravity well. LOL
Savagery34 4 years ago
This claim can be falsified in a number of ways. How many different ways do you want me to falsify this claim? All they did was say "gravity distorts time, lets pretend there's a gazillion times more gravity". If we sat in one of these silly gravity wells, distant galaxies would be BLUE shifted. Our sun is at least a second generation star, meaning entire stars would have had to have gone nova first, to account for all the heavy elements in the solar system. Want more?
Savagery34 4 years ago
Let me put it into simple terms you can understand. If someone believes the scriptures then it would be natural to try and determine if the observations in nature match the scripture. It is science to start with a hypothesis and try to confirm it or falsify it. Just because you have a preconception, that does not make the application of scientific methodolgy a "wrong misuse of science" it is science. Rather than dismiss them out of hand prove them wrong.
kelark 4 years ago
"If someone believes the scriptures then it would be natural to try and determine if the observations in nature match the scripture". Natural human behavior isn't always scientific. Do you believe the scriptures? Talking snakes, people living inside of whales, virgin births, resurrections? If one thinks these claims make sense, then evidence contradicting, universal gravity wells might not sound retarded. To bad cosmology almost (accept religious folk) universally rejects it as worthless.
Savagery34 4 years ago
"try and determine if the observations in nature match the scripture" But that's not even close to what they do. They don't check to see if they match, they reject anything that doesn't match and twist some select nonsense into neat little packages that predisposed religious folk will eat up. That's why they peddle their crap in red state public school boards and not in the free market of scientific scrutiny, where it fails miserably.
Savagery34 4 years ago
Who is the one rejecting? I personally have seen someone pronounced dead be resuscitated, virgin birth is clearly possible with in vitro fertilization, there have been modern instances of men being swallowed by sperm whales and surviving. I sure hope that not all scientists start out with your premise of
"impossible"!
kelark 4 years ago
1) That's not even close to the resurrection I was talking about.
2) Nor is that the virgin birth.
3) If you believe those "modern" whale stories then you're even more gullible then I thought. The guy's wife admitted it was a lie.
So you do believe the magical nonsense in the bible as literal history? Do you back away from your earlier comparison of evidence contradicting, apologetic gravity wells and string theory?
Savagery34 4 years ago
No but they are possible.
kelark 4 years ago
oh how I love this claim.. yeah.. kelark.. how 'bout you stop believing the traitorous science.
We'll see what THEOLOGY gives you in terms of *progress* if you do. Deal?
mooeypoo 4 years ago
If Hawking turns out to wrong about lets say Imaginary Time would it be fair to call his theory idiotic?
Another question would it be possible for an event lets say creation to be have a time a differnt duration based upon the location of those observing such an event?
kelark 4 years ago
"If Hawking turns out to wrong about lets say Imaginary Time would it be fair to call his theory idiotic?" No.
"Another question would it be possible for an event lets say creation to be have a time a differnt duration based upon the location of those observing such an event?" Not nearly that different.
"No but they are possible." Not through nature. Supernatural magic is required.
Savagery34 4 years ago
I love visual aids. What a perfect example of weight and mass.
kelark 4 years ago
Now this is the first thing you said that made any sense.
Savagery34 4 years ago
LOL
kelark 4 years ago
This has to be one of the strangest vids i've ever watched, I was listening to a lecture about mass and weight with giant tits in my face. If only science class was like this..
cbisram 5 years ago
Specificity is so necessary and yet such a pain.
koalman 5 years ago
after watching this video the only thing i got outta it was "mooeypoo can fit a 10 word sentence across her chest" I'm not sure what the purpose of this was. Weather it was to educate or to distract with breast...I donno
onlyberg 5 years ago
Kind of ironic that the words on your shirt are actually censored in your protest against censorship...
If anyone doesn't understand the difference between mass and weight, I wonder how they managed to pass 4th grade science. I weep for the state of education.
ProudAnselmo 5 years ago
What'd she say?
xplosive58 5 years ago
She was talking?
Savagery34 5 years ago
I heard something about mass and weight at the beginning and about anangel13's removed video then it was just "*indiscernable* tomatoes.... *indiscernable*" It's probably youtube up to their censorship tricks, what an outrage.
xplosive58 5 years ago
Fuck, and all we've got in the fridge is SOY milk!
anarchyclayman 5 years ago
Nice tits.
Savagery34 5 years ago
hahahaha nice.. well done!
toastm4n 5 years ago
May I just say, thanks for the mammaries!
shanedk 5 years ago
Hmmm, great vid. I think if you use a bascule for measuring, you'll measure mass. 5 Kg of tomatoes over here will be 5 Kg of tomatoes on the moon. The problem began when whe started measuring with springs
imnama 5 years ago
now i understand why they call you moo (;
AntaresInScorpius 5 years ago
lmao. Me likes.
AntaresInScorpius 5 years ago
Mmm... mass... (droool...)
fragalot 5 years ago
Mass is constant, regardless of where you are, but weight is just a measuring system. If you're on the moon, you weigh less, but your mass is the same. Very nice T-Shirt, by the way.
Caurendur 5 years ago
Thankyou :D Very nice Clarification.
mooeypoo 5 years ago
i want privet lessons 101
majoha2020 5 years ago
Great video!! I have just one question: I was always taught that pounds were a unit of weight and slugs were the corresponding unit of mass. Have I been deceived?? :)
ClosetedAtheist 5 years ago
Okay, I am mainly talking about the metric system, but I will have to do more thorough research into it to answer about the American units.. I've seen conflicting sources, so I don't want to mislead you. I'll check it out. :)
mooeypoo 5 years ago
The metric system is so much easier I just wish everyone would use it.
Is there a way to measure mass directly or are you always required to use force? For example you can measure the force of attraction between two objects (one know mass, the other unknown) and work Newton's equations backwards but I want to know if there is way to do it directly.
ClosetedAtheist 5 years ago
You always need to deduce it from other variables if it's unknown. Simple harmonic motion is another good way of finding mass, where you'd just have to measure the period of oscillation.
yessingno 5 years ago
Pounds are a unit of weight indeed! I say weight, they're a unit of any force, just like newtons. A good way of seeing this is to consider the units of pressure. It is still common to measure pressure in psi, or pounds per square inch (blatent imperialism), whereas it's metric counterpart is the pascal, or newton per square metre.
yessingno 5 years ago
Killograms, pounds, etc, are, scientifically, measures of mass. The two are only the same on Earth, because mass is based on how much that object weighs on Earth gravity. Scientinically, newtons are used as a measure of weight (If I'm not mistaken, a Newton = the weight on an apple)
dechha1981 4 years ago
There must be something thing wrong with my connection I cant hear anymore talking after 1:40. ;)
TheLoadedQuestion 5 years ago
I have never confused the two(weight verses mass), and no, that was not a Freudian slip. ;o) The video was nicely done!
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 5 years ago
talk nerdly to me
999bob666 5 years ago
Well done!
xild 5 years ago
mmmmm b(.v.)bs
DarkRekoning 5 years ago
This must be downloaded to every American high school science class. But I get stuck on the conversion of tomatoes to honeydew melons.
likenfreude 5 years ago
Damn! Only nine minutes? That was too short! I didn't want it to end. Very informative! You have really sweet brains!
Aprilshowersss 5 years ago
hey nice tomatoes
shoejar 5 years ago
I paid attention through the entire lecture. Funny that.
Magnus27 5 years ago
Odd, I kind of always knew this, but still always thought of grams and ounces measurements of weight.
I own you a beer!
weeeezzll 5 years ago
I didn't hear a word, but that was a great video!! Kidding. Experiment on censorship, got it!!
Brainmold 5 years ago
Awesome!
I think censorship on youtube has reached ludicrous proportions. They're yanking videos of women with barefeet because the foot-fetish crowd was getting off on them. They yanked videos of women with hairy armpits (don't know what that was about). My video, "Why is Sex a Sin?" has been flagged, Gisbourne's video showing embarrassiing quotes from the Quran have been yanked.
Is there any other vid site that is more open to free speech? Maybe free-thinkers should do a mass exodus?
imrational 5 years ago
Is there an alternative? LiveVideo seems cool, but the community is weak there. And not many other websites like that have video communities.
mooeypoo 5 years ago
I don't know. It really pisses me off that youtube is caving into censorship. Why?!? I can see people threatening to leave over a video they abhor... but all they have to do is not click on it. Censorship limits everyone. Grrrr.
imrational 5 years ago
Nice, this is when the body and the brain team up, there you have it,smarter turned on males.
Strunz21LEON 5 years ago
great stuff
siener 5 years ago