Added: 2 years ago
From: ShwaNerd
Views: 1,153
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Pat condell is a more respectable person than the junkie known as coughlan

  • Splinter Cell Conviction Cracked by Razor1911

    Proof Here

    /watch?v=O3OZEF3rwHc

  • gather your thoughts before you record yourself dude

  • 3:51 - So... No superheroes in Canada?

  • In recent years, Saudi Arabia has faced many terrorist issues. Yet (as far as I know) no move to ban the burka in that country. Why you might ask?

    Perhaps because they employ more female security staff to check the burka wearers. Therefore more earned income for women and no major burka security problem for the Saudis.

  • I've seen a few in the last year or so, I think it's on the rise.

  • Is it permissible in Canada for anyione at all, man or woman, to enter a public building wearing a ski-mask or a hockey-goalie mask ... or a Ronald Reagan mask. Anything that conceals identity? I don't think so.

    I believe that in UK at least, motorcycle delivery guys MUST remove their helmets before entering. Why should religion have special privileges?

  • You know, I say we get working X-Ray spectacles and this can stop being a problem, plus comic book sales will no doubt shoot through the roof.

  • Cool; that pretty much sums up my view as well.

  • music and end of vid bit exceissive. not bad tho.

    which band?

  • The Band is Testament, the song is True Believer from the album The Gathering.

  • Mostly agree with you.

    On Turban, equivalent protective gear should be required I think. Their heads can still be covered without ... It is their safety but cost money to state. (Its silly to let people needlessly die.)

    I never heard of a Canadian disguise law? Which level of government? Obviously for driving, work and such, as your said, its impractical. the Kadr's do this tho.

    You won't irradicate islam in your life time or even christianity. ;).

  • Good video. Sounded like you hit all the key points.

  • Swa, go to Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge for the latest in summer burka wear. Yes, the burka is as much a Canadian experience as Britain.

  • Well, you can say I'm a pretty much crazy Condell fan(I think you got this idea from my messages to Spinkwotzer who made a parody of Pat), but don't worry, I haven't unsubbed from you. You made lots of good points in your video response to Pat which I agree with.

    However, Islam still sucks and deserves every bit of shit that is coming towards it, whether it is from Pat or anyone else, especially after over 13000 deadly terrorist attacks since 9/11all over the world.

  • Well said, Shwanerd. I made a 2 part video response on the subject to BoundlessEyes(Who quite frankly spewed lots of relativistic tripe in her video) as well, please check it out.

  • I used to like PC's rants because they felt refreshingly direct and to the point. But after a while refreshing directness turns into more of the same and a disturbing lack of nuance.

    Burka. Still have not made up my mind but I do know that forbidding it is more likely to stimulate people to stick/hide in their religious groups than it is to liberate individuals.

  • Agreed, If we ban the burks, the only result it will have is that we will see a lot fewer muslim women with a strong religions persuasion, or with husbonds with a strong religions persuasion, out in society. It doesn't mean they are not there, but they will remain indoor.

  • *burka. (i cant hit my keys it's so hot.)

  • You're response is sort of a misnomer, as coughlan's vid was way more rambling.

  • I could care less about patcondell, but he is 100% right. Second, i think coughlan is a homo. I cant stand him at all. He is also not funny.

  • and your a theist. Doesnt get much worse.

  • Well, that's 30 crazy ones. I'm a Pat Condell fan. But I disagree with him on this. I agree with you, and thought your response was entirely in bounds.

  • Well that's just stupid. Well, you lost 30 fickle people who arbitrarily leave, so good riddance. I wouldn't want them as subs anyway.

  • A question and a comment. Question: If a bank were to use iris recognition technology to identify patrons should patrons still have to show their entire faces?

    Comment: As far as safety goes, I have a winter coat under which I could hide all the appliances in my kitchen. I could easily wear a bomb under it. I don't think anyone considers my wearing that coat a safety matter when I go into a public place like a bank.

  • Well, your winter jacket doesn't hide your face, right? And if for example the police asked to search you, you'd have no problem unzipping your jacket etc. right?

    They obviously won't remove their burka for any reason. I guess the iris technology would be a good alternative, HOWEVER it will take quite some time before that becomes cost-effective. It's just too expensive to employ for a small portion of the population.

  • Actually, the coat has a hood, with a flap that covers the lower part of the face. Although, I do take that off when I go inside.

    Female suicide bombers could just as well wear other garments.

    Of course, the question about iris technology is hypothetical for the time being. I do agree that Muslim women should be required to show their faces in situations where everyone else is expected to do the same for identification purposes. But that could be enforced without banning the burqa.

  • As for unzipping for the police . . . well, if I were in a public space I would strenuously object, and then comply like the pussy I am, to being searched in the absence of probable cause. However, a bank, e.g., would actually be somebody's private property, so presumably they could require a look under the coat on the basis of lesser suspicion or as a matter of routine security.

  • Well I don't know about your laws in the states, but up here police are absolutely forbidden from forcing you to comply to a search without either a warrant, or at the very least reasonable and probable grounds. In a place like a bank, signs would be posted outside that state you MUST comply to a search to be allowed entry. If you don't want to be searched, then you don't enter. Simple as that.

  • Sounds like Canadian law is similar to US law in that respect. Although, some cops seem to have been absent from class the day they discussed unlawful searches.

  • ...and if I might add, it really doesn't matter what the specific laws are necessarily when it comes to police, if they're having a bad day and they're not on camera cops can get away with whatever they feel like and when it comes down to it, it's your word against theirs.

  • I like what you said at 4:40. I'm so tired of reading or hearing things along the line of "but they wear burkas because they want too, it's their own free will and freedom"... Yeah, it's just a fashion trend, my sister so wants one that matches her shoes (the tip of the toes at least).

  • kewl ^.^

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more