Added: 1 year ago
From: MuslimoftheMonth
Views: 15,048
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,097)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • mong :)

  • lamest thing i've seen today. and i've watched ann coulter videos today.

  • nice

    

  • Wooah! This guy is realy lame.

  • Dumb

  • i do hope he is trollin for the sake of the children

  • You are an idiot and all of these random rants are silly and gross misunderstandings of the concepts. You're actually not helping your cause here buddy....

  • having a little trouble holding that touch of gay back, not that i have a problem with that, but the other muslims...

  • I just got dumber! Cause the guy looks like an ape! That should be evidence enough!

  • Holy s**t! I think I just got stupider for watching this idiot!

  • Lol is this guy for real? A theory is not a guess. A guess is a guess, a theory is the best possible explanation at the time ala the theory of gravity or the theory of relativity or the theory of evolution. All testable falsifiable facts. And clearly you don't understand how evolution works. If a human had givin birth to a monkey or elephant or giraffe then it would disprove evolution..dumbass

  • you dumb homo. try this next time, read a book

  • That was not one sentence.

  • This is the second video I've seen of this guy's stuff, and surely this has to be satire, like Edward Current.

  • I think you had a stroke or else you aren't trying hard enough to open the left side of your mouth.

  • The chimp in this video is every bit as stupid and ridiculous as he looks......

  • Why is it so that people ceep "misinterpreting" evolution ?

  • @xXsakkelaoXx Because they prefer to read fiction - Educating themselves within the context of grounded reality is just too scary.

  • @Infinitpossibilities How come there are so many creationists with Ph.D's and other respectable "educationmarks"?

  • @xXsakkelaoXx Because often they're issued by scientifically unreputable institutions? Besides, qualifications are poor defence of authority in argument. It's how arguments hold up to scrutiny; That's where authority is earned. If you can ignore theory based out of tangible, vigorously tested evidence in favour of one that only appears reasonable as it compliments a "sacred" story, you clearly misunderstood something profoundly fundamental to science and should stick to philosophy.

  • @Infinitpossibilities So if big bang believers follow the scientific method more than christians? why did they make up a hypothetical oort cloud then?

    Why is it so that natural selection was noticed before darwin by creationists and used as proof for variation within the kinds as we observe and not the countless transitional fossils we should observe if evolution occured?

  • qwertyfshag is a tard. 

  • Pretender for the Nobel Prize, are you? What a breakthorugh...

  • Sucks that we wasted all that time using science to invent transgenic mice for research. We could have just set some mouse traps out back by the barn, since we're, like, totally identical genetically.

  • Isn't a theory anymore. It is a Law (Hypothesis [where religion still stands], to Theory [hypothesis with lots of evidence supporting it], to Law [Theory that has been proven true]). I assume when you talk to atheists you talk to generally ones who do not know too much about the scientific laws and theories. Evolution has been proven true NOT by genetics but by other things I cannot fit into these 500 characters. Brief summary, lots of fossils and seeing happen before our eyes (over 20 years)

  • @philliphamilton2 It is a theory, which is the highest level an idea can get in science. A theory is a predictive model that takes into account all verified facts. The facts are the what, and the theory is the explanation of the why. Just like gravity is a fact, and the theory of gravity explains why it functions the way it does. Everything in science is falsifiable, because the method takes into account that we're just human, and there's more to know that might contradict our current models

  • @dlunas81 Actually laws are the highest an idea can get. Science is falsifiable it is also EMPIRICAL.

    Unfortunately there is no empirical, (and falsifiable) evidence of evolution. Just inference based assumptions, (like archeology) hence evolution fails to even meet the scientific method and thus is not scientific

  • @Gilbertus1986 Scientific laws are factual observations usually derived from mathematical modeling; they merely distill empirical results into concise verbal or mathematical statements that express a fundamental principle of science - for example, gravity attracts, force equals mass times acceleration and so on. Theories are the causal explanations behind what creates these laws and observations of nature. Theories also combine laws into a framework that is greater than the sum of its parts.

  • @Gilbertus1986 As for evolution, scientists have observed over 70 instances of speciation, found thousands of transitional fossils, and every time different fields of study, such as genetics, geology, and radiometric dating test the relevant pieces of the puzzle, the finding all converge on the same answer. A theory, like evolution, has to make a predictive model based on all the evidence, and if it's contradicted by new findings, the theory has to be retooled.

  • @Gilbertus1986 A scientific law and theory are not even the same type of thing. One cannot ever become the other. It's not what they are. Saying laws are higher than theories is about as ridiculous as saying the theory of evolution has to explain how life began on Earth or why the big bang happened.

  • Oh dang I wish god wasn't just a theory either damn you are wrong if our belief is wrong then how can you prove yours?

  • About 99 percent of genes in humans have counterparts in the mouse," said Eric Lander, Director of the Whitehead Institute Center for Genomic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "Eighty percent have identical, one-to-one counterparts."

    So that means that mice and men have 80% in common while chimps and men have obviously more genes in fact 98% in common!! which makes sense since they are closer related!

  • this video makes more atheist than every other video lol

  • Seriously dude...if I were as ignorant of 9th grade biology as you are I wouldn't be advertising it on YouTube. Get thee to a library and catch up on 150+ years of converging evidence from many fields affirming the reality of evolution, you self-righteous ignorant primate. Also stop believing primitive barbaric nonsense from stone-age books about magical chariots and shit. Math and science aren't your enemy dude. Sure they're hard but it's worth learning so you don't sound like a fucking moron.

  • This guy's a white Anglo Saxon Muslim. Clearly he has issues.

  • Go stone someone fuckface!

  • @dudeavon You almost made me piss myself with that one! Love it! ...Anyway, I miss Hitchens already...and I hope Dawkins doesn't end up bitter and angry like Hitchens did dealing with all these religious fanatics.

  • I call Poe's Law on this one

  • This is what would happen if a bronze age man had access to technology, like a computer and a camera.

  • Hey, whats up Darth Vader? Nice red lightsaber, you should think about coming over to the good side where the Force is strong and strawmen don't exist!

  • Religious people like to use science when it suits them, but turn a blind eye when it doesn't. Also, usually they make up scientific lies or take things out of context. Human and mice have have a lot of identical DNA, although most of the DNA humans share with mice (like the DNA of a tail) is switched off. Only a person who is uncertain of his beliefs, will twist the facts.

  • but god doesn't exist, has ZERO facts. mad?

  • its funny that evolution was declared fact... in the 1900s

  • Just, wow... must be a troll. I can't believe anyone would be this ignorant.

  • This guy is obviously trolling XD or just way to stupid.

  • LOOL...What do i expected from a person who can't count up to "ONE" and is randomly mixing scientific numbers. Nice example for MuslimoftheMonth :)

  • Prat.

  • allah can barely have its existence proven as it is with the help of idiots like you, lest help you become less ignorant. rather circular i think this vicious cycle is. idiots tries prove allah and fails- idiots ask allah to make them less ignorant and fails- and idiots uncured tries again to prove allah's existence and fails expectedly- idiots again asks for something that cannot be proven to existence for enlightenment - FAIL

  • If evolution is true then why don't monkeys have another human today? I have never seen a baby human born out of a monkey. ...... maybe couse they are monkeys and canot impregnate each other since they are not the same species ? O_o and btw for science "theory" means its been proven else its not called a theory .....

  • @lala45531 Learn something before you open your mouth.

    /watch?v=EdByuGCKCG4&feature=c­hannel_video_title

  • @LastNineBreaker no i refuse to

  • All this video proves is that theists don't know what evolution is, which is why they don't realise why it's true. They also don't know what theory means in the realms of science.

  • go rename the title "dumbass proved by ONE sentence"

  • You F*CKING Moron. You actually think we evole from apes to mice ? This is the exact reason why evolution should be taught in fucking america. And what do you think about rudimental organs and the equalities in atanomy ? Not to mention the evidence in the field of embrylogy and fucking biochemy

  • Trying to grasp long stretches of time and space can be quite mind boggling, espcially when one starts to discuss things like light years and eons. Just how long millions of years is seems to escape the thinking capacity of most religious people. I don't think he is a troll, if he is, its just as sad as being as dumb as he pretends because he seems to spend all his time watching, liking and commenting and making Islamic videos.

  • How ironic....

    Pfft!

  • Dude, this is brilliant!!! How has nobody ever thought of this before?!? You would think that the scientific community, which has spent well over a century tirelessly researching evolution, would have thought of this by now, but you nailed it! You could get a Nobel Prize for disproving evolution, hurry before someone steals your idea!

  • wow, the dumbest upload award goes to....... this moron

  • I'm betting this guy's an atheist trolling us. His use of classic creationist rhetoric in crystalized, even exaggerated form with a straight face is too perfect.

  • You're an ugly douche and hearing your voice makes me want to punch you

  • "ONE" sentence ;D

    God created us 10k years ago, and he planted dinosaurs just to mess with our head... that makes perfect sense

  • It's hard to be interesting, and this guy knows it.

    That's why he went to a lot of trouble editing his video so that different hats would appear magically on his head. Mad as a hatter.

    Interesting.

    He probably thought it would be a fun cool thing to do.

    Or maybe he thought it would stop me from falling asleep.

    Which it did.

    Maybe he's a closet comedian. Get a better gag writer and hatter and you might get paid for being a goof.

  • monkeys, to mice, to humans.... wow, if you're going to attempt to disprove a theory, at least understand the theory first....

  • I'm going to assume this guy is just trollin', but for the people who agree with him: a theory in science is something much different than the every day use of the word. Gravity is just a theory, as is the earth rotating around the sun. These things are not disputed, and the word "theory" carries a lot of weight in science.

  • oh man, so dumb

    its not the theory of evolution, its the FACT of evolution by means of the theory of natural selection.

    we can go on and talk about the evolutionary traits your brain warping religion has to ensure it survives and breeds too, hopefully religions die and and get buried into a distinct rock layer.

  • dont even smarter than ALI G.

  • is this guy like the biggest troll on the internet? Are you an archeologist? Are you a biologist? Are you a scholor? Try and get an education about what you're talking about rather than making a shit stain of a video like this.

  • bot

  • ahahahah, thanks for the laugh... actually, wait a second, that wasn't funny, just plain ignorant, read something.

  • 1. you are not smarter than darwin

    2. you cannot prove that there is a god.

    are you kidding me?

  • The quotation at the end is priceless.

  • This video is so fucking good. I love the hopeless ignorance.

  • 1. We share common genes with mice and chimps. That 1% is enough to completely define us from the other two.

    2. I ROFL'd so hard when you said that: monkey->mice->humans, the fact that you think THIS is evolution is what makes people think you're stupid (rightfully so).

    3. The layers of rock ARE distinct (what you said is a flat out lie).

    4. ALL fossils are transitional fossils, as they ALL document small changes throughout time.

    Please thumbs up so this retard can learn something.

  • @Sasoun1234 what about that 50s shoe(with the foot petrified inside) found in a Rock that was supposedly 220,000 years old?

  • @Sasoun1234 Trust me, it'll take more time than its worth to try and educate this monumentally ignorant individual. Its theistic imbeciles like this one that haunt my darkest nightmares; can you imagine how awful society would be if there were no enlightened atheists to provide reason?!

  • religion is for faggots...

  • Its called carbon dating my friend. If you don't believe in evolution it goes to say you believe creationism right? Then how do you explain the Galapagos iguanas that we have, in OUR generation, seen go through a physical evolution to adapt to sea life? All in which has taken place within 40 or so years?

  • You are a moron, dude.

  • To peer into the midnight sky with the poor vision of the human eye, to ponder wether the devine or chance was our creater. could it be that the cosmos was created by a simple mind or was it created by chance and time. The proof is simple only 5% of creatures still exist and 95% have gone extinct. To think that an all loving god would treat woman like slaves and stone a child if he disobeyed, sounds like the rantings of a lunatic in the desert. We are stardust indeed, maybe the gods are we.

  • Hmm, you can't say something isn't true because it's a theory and not a fact.

    Evolution is a theory because everyone is welcome to disprove it. Gravitational attraction is a theory. Now one day someone might come up with a better explanation of why things go splat than gravitational attraction, and that would become the new theory. That wouldn't change the fact that if you drop an orange from a height of more than three metres onto hard ground, it goes splat.

    And becomes a lot less annoying ;)

  • Comment removed

  • Unreasoning jibberish.. Hasn't studied biology at all, apparently. BTW it didn't work. I'm still an atheist!

  • LoL, Atheists are so easily trolled

  • @JesusisLord685 if with trolled you mean criticized by mentally handicaps, I agree

  • dude.. you are a wicked troll.

  • Just say what you have to say and take your lumps.  That hat-switching thing is really distracting.

  • ...first of all, not one sentence, second of all, only proves that mice, apes and humans have a common ancestor. Third of all, seriously? You are still trying to pretend like evolution isn't a proven fact?

  • What an allahdamn idiot this clown is.

  • Even as the way you put it, we still have more believable evidence than you will ever have ;) "I heard a voice in my head so I wrote down what it was telling me" umm..

  • I feel sorry for your parents... Although if you were an orphan it might explain your developmental disability.

  • The fact that man used to be shorter then we are today, that is an example of evolution, simple.

  • It's not just the percentage that accounts for our common ancestry with the other primates, you fool.

    You want to see transitional fossils? Look it up. Google exists now. Fucking use it.

  • A "theory" in biology is not a guess. It's a hypothesis that has been proven again and again. It's not called a law, like in physics or chemistry, because biology deals with organisms that are in a constant state of change and flux (i.e. EVOLUTION). Oh and there are lots of "transitional fossils". Try doing a google search.

  • You missed the fact that we did NOT evolve from monkeys but that monkeys and humans evolved from the same antecessor. Oh and mice and men and monkeys and rabbits have also same antecessors because primates originate from antecessors of rabbits and mice. Thats why the similarities in the DNA exist. The solution for the difference in the percentage is convergent evolution.

  • You can do a scienctific test to prove the existence of god matey. Go to the top of a very tall building, then pray to god that when you jump off, he or she will put out their giant hand and save you. Go on, I bet you don't have that much faith..

  • funniest part is in the description - "I have never seen a baby human born out of a Monkey".

  • This guy is so much help for the evolution lobby....

  • Damn you need god in your life.... Keep telling urself stupid shit.

  • You should pray to Allah more, because you're still an ignorant fool.

  • That's not how evolution works dude. What a complete dumbass.

  • The fact is bacon tastes delicious and you can't have any. Athiests 1 Muslims 0

  • Wow - talk about not understanding evolution at all - what a complete idiot!

  • Congratulations for looking as dumb as you sound. Well done.

  • God! you are an Idiot...Close your mouth and try reading.

  • We share 97.5% of our DNA with mice, silly.

  • @ponynomial actually if you do a quick google search you will find that scientists now believe we do share 99 percent of our genes with mice.according to the dec 4th 2002 article of cnntech.

  • @cassidy99ful And if you actually read the article, you find it says 99% of the mouse genome has counterparts in the human genome. Only 80% is identical, even less than I claimed from the more reputable source of New Scientist.

  • @ponynomial right it just depends which ones are turned on and which ones are turned off.so what determines which genome gets activated and which ones stay dormant?

  • Comment removed

  • Well, i guess "Allah" has not save him from being a fool :D

  • butt

  • @muslimpfthemonth terrorist!

  • Yet another creationist moron who doesn't understand anything about transitional fossils. How can you criticise Evolution when you don't actually understand how it works?

  • Evolution HAS been declared as fact since it has been proven. There is the whole fossil record to back this up. Maybe actually doing some research may help you get your head out of the sand.

  • Please be troll. Please, I fucking beg of you.

  • Excuse me Mr. Muslim, do you actually have any proof that creationism is the truth? i would like to see them

  • drink poison

    mark 16:18

  • idiot

  • Chimps and humans share 99.9% of DNA :)

  • This is a comedy act guys.. although not very serious but it's obvious he's taking the piss here.

  • @YTRonaldMcDonald Unfortunately i don't think so.

  • Ugh the stupid emanating from this video hurt my head.

  • your critical thinking skills and understanding of logic are something to be desired. :-/

  • @jblock2490 you may have gotten trolled fuck head

  • @jblock2490 wow u are a sad schizophrenic fuck

  • Wait, ear him out guys. Virgin births and a boat containing a pair of the worlds animals makes much more sense. I mean really… what could we have possibly learned since the bronze age.

  • This is why people are still talking about the "theory" of evolution and not the "FACT" of evolution. People like this don't understand how it works and don't bother to educate themselves on how things actually happen. Religion will continue to be the crutch of the ignorant because people are too damned lazy to actually learn something.

  • Theory in science doesn't mean guessing. Fool. And second, what does religion have to prove itself anything more than a 'theory'?

  • This was hard to watch

  • 1st thing, we don't share 99% with mice, where the fuck did you get this information?

  • @TrollingDayAndNight how bout 2nd and 3rd ? :P

  • @xXsakkelaoXx by "1st" i meant the primary point is"

  • @xXsakkelaoXx and if you want 2nd: it isn't one sentence

    

  • DISORGANIZED IGNORANCE

  • This guy is a fucking retard. What he's trying to disprove is actually Abiogenesis, not evolution. Do your fucking homework. By the way, why the fuck is the story of the spacedaddy who put two naked teenagers on earth with a talking snake any less ridiculous. Bitch.

  • Oh yeah evolution is SUCH a theory. Just like what is it?.. Oh yes gravity. Gravity is still just a theory.

  • Idiot of the month...

  • I urge any creationist reading this. Please read "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkings.

    It sums up the whole Atheist argument. That is, if you can give yourself the freedom of picking up and reading a book? After all, isnt there freedom in Christ or Allah?....

    HAHAHAH

    But seriously. READ IT.

  • Your constant uneducated ramblings about DNA likeness percentages make you look like an idiot. Biologists or anyone understanding DNA structure will tell you that 1% of total genes or possible segments is enormous and can result in whole physiological changes on a species.

    The fossils and dating are used to compound evidence that species that once occurred with similar bone structures have changed over time. Bone and DNA structures prove they are of similar or same.

    Like this to spread truth

  • I know this guy is a retard and all, but how was this one sentence?

  • the real order of evolution was: Dust, apple, monkey, mouse, T-Rex ninja, bacon, pig, egg, chicken, monkey, mouse, human. Shit read a god damn wiki link already and gain some knowledge.

  • Thanks for posting this, Evolution-Creationism 1-0 :D

    Somehow this guy missed the evolution train LOL

  • Yea, evolution is false, and we came from dust turned into Adam and his rib turned into Eve and everlasting incest party of their children..

    Creationists, perfectly sane...

  • most useless video on youtube. even the shortest video on youtube has more uses than this thing

  • You are indeed muslim of the month, heck yo're muslim of the effing century that is if muslims equate to ignorant twits.

  • I think I just physicly felt my IQ drop for 1:23 mins...

  • These ppl think earth is like 6k years old, how can u argue with them? A simple wall is more responsive than that.

  • @nlpow these ppl think they come from a rock 4.5 billion years ago, how can one argue against such a thing?

  • @xXsakkelaoXx 4,5 of bilion freaking years. A rock would turn into air and then again form a rock and you still have 4,49999 bilion years to go. In that time, a single cell of protein can form a living being. Or 50 000 era's of different living beings shaping and forming other different living beings and by natural selection you are left with the most adaptable living being type - human, though I think it's only a start, there will be much smarter beings 5 milion years from now.

  • @nlpow are you saing that a rock turns to air and back in 10 million years? "in that time a single cell of protein can form a living being," this has never been observed or proven, actually it is highly unlikely to happen. I dont think you have understood the complexity of proteins, check out the ATP synthesis enzyme on youtube. living beings shaping other living beings? is this by mutation or natural selection?

  • @nlpow And natural selection happens, yes, but always within the species, and there is always a LOSS of information, not a gain, a wolf can be breed into a chiauaua but a chiauaua can NEVER EVER be breed into a wolf again, the original information in the wolf is gone. And there is absolutely no observable scientific evidence of a beneficial mutation that increases the information in the genome, evolution ( in the common ancestor becoming all the species sense) is pretty much refuted right there.

  • @xXsakkelaoXx Actually, Creationists believe we came from a rock (clay?). The difference is that you think there was a magical incantation involved. I don't believe in magic.

  • @stoicsquirrel oh, yeah, thats what we believe, get a grip m8, we believe a supernatural GOD is the only thing that can explain, the origin of life, and the extreme complexity and vast amounts of information in the DNA that evolution and abiogenesis can NOT account for.

  • @xXsakkelaoXx Right. According to the Bible God molded the first man from clay, spoke a little magical incantation and brought that clay to life. So, yeah, that IS - if you accept the story of creation in Genesis - is exactly what you believe. Yet Creationists laugh at atheists for not believing in the magic part of the story.

  • @stoicsquirrel Let me be more presice:

    You believe that an explosion from NOTHING created EVERYTHING

    I believe, that a supernatural GOD, created the whole universe from nothing (time, space and matter was created too) and he makes laws and upholds those laws (like the laws of gravity)

    question: in a random explosion, why would there be order in the universe?

    and btw: it says dust, how is that a rock?

  • @xXsakkelaoXx

    Yeah, but if we find the higgs particles or find what constitutes elementary particles you will all just look like a load of loony idiots. More than you already do. Compounding your list of shortcomings. You're already;

    Hypocrites

    Murderers

    Paedophiles

    Racists

    Homophobes

    The list goes on...

  • @headphones222

    Two scientists:

    The LHC is being promoted as setting out to prove the Big Bang by the discovery of the Higgs Boson. If from a Creation stand point the Big Bang is a myth, what will the discovery of this particle show?

    Dr Stephen B, England

  • @headphones222 Dear Dr B

    Thanks for your interest in this topic. I think discovery of the Higgs boson would help with a unified field theory, and shed new light on the mystery of matter. But as you implied, it is only accelerator-financing hype that the Higgs would take the Big Bang out of the realm of science fiction. Lots of other cosmologies are possible, with or without a Higgs boson.

  • @xXsakkelaoXx

    Religion is based on no evidence.You still cannot refute that in the history of mankind no reference of evidence has ever been created to support the existence of a supernatural being.

  • @headphones222 Actually in the bible danial predicts the future accuratly, also the bible says that the earth should be around 6000 years old, something we can measure by looking at leackage of helium in rocks beneath the earths surface and C-14 still in rocks that should of dissapeared long ago, also the earths magnetic field that continuously decreases in value predicts a young earth, and DIRECTLY condradicts the billion year veiw.

  • @xXsakkelaoXx

    Carbon dating has proved the approximate age of the universe to be around 14 billions years. In addition to that carbon dating of bones and the depth of fossils shows that dinosaurs and other mammals were alive 65 millions years Ago. The bible does not predict anything accurately...

  • @headphones222 hahahahah!! You do know that C-14's half age is 5730 years right? well, if the earth is billions of years old, why do we find C-14 still in abundancy in rocks beneath the earths surface??? please explain that to me. You see if the earth is billions of years old, it wouldn't of been. The bible gets everything right. The depth of fossils? How does that prove that they were 65 million years old?

  • @xXsakkelaoXx

    What? You do realise the earth hasnt always been that shape? The whole idea of carbon dating is to know the half life of c-14 and then based on the mass of what you have and the % c-14 still active approximate the age.

    I wont argue with you any more because in the words of Dawkins: You're and idiot.

  • @headphones222 rocks in closed systems beneath the earth system isn't earths beneath the earths system? when did I say that? lol, why don't you change your theory according to observations: that is my question ;)

    Ok, piss off then, don't argue me, to be honest people like you are lost from the start, most probably out of ignorance

  • @xXsakkelaoXx

    You do not understand what you are talking about. Carbon dating in bones has proved age and so has dating of ice cores etc... Theoretical physics has also compounded this evidence. You are open to disagree and believe in your religious fairy tale if you want.

    But havent you ever wondered why maybe just maybe the rest of the world just wants all you guys to fall into a small hole and die?

  • @headphones222 Most probably because you know we are right and you don't want to acknowledge it, Helium diffusion in rocks and the moons ressesion are evolutionary timescale impossibilities, also io's heat, spiral galaxies and the earths and other planets strong magnetic fields, your strawman arguments don't hold up to real science. And those ice core age measurments are proven fallacies as they found a plane not that old burried deap in supposed old ice. Also where are the monopoles?why logic?