In these older films, we have to speed up the playback rate by a factor of 3-5, since we did the manipulation manually. When we run it automatically (yes - the nanoassembly line is here :-)... its much faster, i think, even faster than the sped-up view you see here. Ill see if i can get Volkmar to cough up some of the recent films :)
But... there are some other, pretty cool stuff coming up, when i get the time to edit the film ...
That would be a bit difficult, but in principle - yes. Right now they can be mounted on small mobile robots (1 cm x 1 cm x 1 cm), which drive around on a surface... but making them much smaller is not very practical. Nanorobots are much easier (although not easy) by modifying bacteria and vira (which are nanobots), or making artificial cells with micelles, and give them functions by attaching molecules to them. In contrast, the microgripper here works best in vacuum :)
I was thinking maybe using something similar to Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software tech. for these little robots to recognized certain objects & assemble them together.
Could it be possible for nanobots to be powered from an external source (like electromagnetic induction)? Or even have their "brain" external but control remotely via radio waves from a computer to reduce its size?
I could see the technological hurdle if the microgripper works best in the vacuum.
nanotechnology is alien technology, alien-made, not man-made ! we need to seriously question this type of technology because there's alot of negative uses for this stuff, & they're keeping this type of technology out of public inquiry !
they can also latch on to your neurons & use frequencies to change your perceptions of your environment !
nice - molecular engineering is awesome. And if you *really* want to see something impressing then google salmonella or coli, together with flagellae - try to google "images". The propeller proteins of bacteria never cease to fascinate me.. molecular engineering at its best. (Im *not* creationist, nature just had a lot of time to perfect the job)
The long arms are about 200 mikrometers long. The fingers that grab the nanotubes are about 4 micrometers long. The gap between the fingers is then typically about 2 micrometer. We are now making them somewhat smaller - we hope soon to show you what they can do :)
Well - there is a danish group (iNANO at århus university) who has specialised in ultrafast STM (scanning tunneling microscopy) and they actually make the individual frames into totally mindblowing movies.... ill ask them if i can post some of them here...
Scanning electron. Scanning-tunneling and atomic force microscopes (this vid shows a tip being attached to an AFM) are sensitive enough to map out individual molecules, but can't produce a moving video.
These are absolutely amazing break throughs in technology. How can we make a gripper 50 times smaller then this? that's like 2-300 nanometers across. Although my math is probably off seeing as I have no true scale to measure. Could it be possible to perhaps manipulate a single partical with this method in the future?
well - we are trying to make them 25 times smaller using focused ion beam. We etch out the structures using a 1 nm large diameter beam of gallium ions. But we havent tested them, and dont know if they will be useful. Yet :)
It sort of shows in the beginning, but the scalebars dont appear very clear. The nanotube is a big fat multiwalled carbon nanotube of more than 100 nm in diameter, and the base is covered with amorphous carbon (i.e. not nicely crystalline like nanotubes), so it appears like a cone (a fat base) rather than cylindrical. The nanotubes are typically 10 micrometer long, i.e. 1/100 of a mm.
Thanks for the answer. One more thing. Is their some possibility that we can make spheres of same diameter in the micrometer range? The preferred material should be titanium oxide.
No i dont do the experiments anymore - these are done by my great group of researchers, students and of course collaborators. Actually the film is recorded by a german Ph.D. student, Volkmar Eichhorn, with my master student Kenneth Carlson.
Oopps i deleted a comment by mistake...the question was :can i pick up DNA? The answer is "no", because DNA cannot stand the heat. The gripper works by expansion caused by a temperature increase. It would kill the DNA. Also the DNA is too small... we are now making grippers that are 50 times smaller than these, and which can manipulate maybe even single walled nanotubes :)
Actually the grippers are too small... The genitialia of insects would be huge compared to the size of the grippers. But actually, that is a good question. I dont know the size of the penis of a housefly. Do you?
when we are breaking them it disconnects from the surface on which we have grown it......in that sense we are breaking a bond between carbon and some other material ..........not a carbon carbon bond so i suppose it may be the reason
well, first of all the nanotubes only have their phenomenal strength when they are made perfectly. The nanotubes you see here have many defects... i would rate the rigidity (how stiff they are) as akin to hardened steel, and their strength perhaps 10 times higher.
I would rather say just "nanoassembly" than "nanofactories"... :) its still really slow. We will need to speed the process up *a lot* to even make one-by-one assembly of AFM probes like this feasible.
This technology is too advanced for the mankind we DO NOT have the conscience to use it well and most of it is used to kill PPL at this hour!
flanchwerd 1 month ago
is this how you pluck nano-pubes?
bLackmarketRadio 7 months ago in playlist Archive of Weird Physics
@bLackmarketRadio how did you guess?
NanoClips 3 months ago
What´s the name of the song? :)
bommobiel 8 months ago
The music would have been better if it kept more of a pattern.
WhiteDragon103 1 year ago
In these older films, we have to speed up the playback rate by a factor of 3-5, since we did the manipulation manually. When we run it automatically (yes - the nanoassembly line is here :-)... its much faster, i think, even faster than the sped-up view you see here. Ill see if i can get Volkmar to cough up some of the recent films :)
But... there are some other, pretty cool stuff coming up, when i get the time to edit the film ...
NanoClips 1 year ago
Is it realtime?
Elvarks 1 year ago
This was awesome thanks for sharing it!
kdomn37 1 year ago
i love the song whatever it is
ace3esp 1 year ago
awesome music
fnorgen 1 year ago
...nanobots ..nice . ...
native707 1 year ago
WOW!
Nice video NanClips!
Now if they had thousands of these nano hands operated by computers they could theorectically start assembling small items.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
That would be a bit difficult, but in principle - yes. Right now they can be mounted on small mobile robots (1 cm x 1 cm x 1 cm), which drive around on a surface... but making them much smaller is not very practical. Nanorobots are much easier (although not easy) by modifying bacteria and vira (which are nanobots), or making artificial cells with micelles, and give them functions by attaching molecules to them. In contrast, the microgripper here works best in vacuum :)
NanoClips 2 years ago
I was thinking maybe using something similar to Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software tech. for these little robots to recognized certain objects & assemble them together.
Could it be possible for nanobots to be powered from an external source (like electromagnetic induction)? Or even have their "brain" external but control remotely via radio waves from a computer to reduce its size?
I could see the technological hurdle if the microgripper works best in the vacuum.
Jenfucius 2 years ago
@NanoClips How do they even make the little grabber device that small lol?
DPat6590 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nanotechnology is alien technology, alien-made, not man-made ! we need to seriously question this type of technology because there's alot of negative uses for this stuff, & they're keeping this type of technology out of public inquiry !
they can also latch on to your neurons & use frequencies to change your perceptions of your environment !
folly4444 2 years ago
i am just a little jealous of your job, by about a nonometer
goldmosaic 2 years ago
the song in this is freaking amazing. Anyone know who it is?
padrescout 2 years ago
check out "battlesnack" at myspace. Its my oneman electronic music project - much easier to use my own or friends music than to get permissions :)
The track is called "denialistic" and has vocals - some people like it better without.
NanoClips 2 years ago
you know in Singapore on 6 15, 2009 they created a controllable gear thats about 1.2nm!
rimpick 2 years ago
nice - molecular engineering is awesome. And if you *really* want to see something impressing then google salmonella or coli, together with flagellae - try to google "images". The propeller proteins of bacteria never cease to fascinate me.. molecular engineering at its best. (Im *not* creationist, nature just had a lot of time to perfect the job)
NanoClips 2 years ago
nice!
rimpick 2 years ago
@rimpick Is that like the same thing in this video or is it even smaller?
DPat6590 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice try. Keep it up check out esteembpo + com for social media marketing. jtrtvdfh
SadeTabitha 2 years ago
how long are the pinchers that grab the little stick (in nanometers)?
Andreas958 2 years ago
The long arms are about 200 mikrometers long. The fingers that grab the nanotubes are about 4 micrometers long. The gap between the fingers is then typically about 2 micrometer. We are now making them somewhat smaller - we hope soon to show you what they can do :)
NanoClips 2 years ago
song?
UntoldSecrets1 3 years ago
Well - there is a danish group (iNANO at århus university) who has specialised in ultrafast STM (scanning tunneling microscopy) and they actually make the individual frames into totally mindblowing movies.... ill ask them if i can post some of them here...
NanoClips 3 years ago
Okay, just one thing. WTF type of camera is that small?
Xxero0 3 years ago
Scanning electron. Scanning-tunneling and atomic force microscopes (this vid shows a tip being attached to an AFM) are sensitive enough to map out individual molecules, but can't produce a moving video.
DeltaWound 3 years ago
These are absolutely amazing break throughs in technology. How can we make a gripper 50 times smaller then this? that's like 2-300 nanometers across. Although my math is probably off seeing as I have no true scale to measure. Could it be possible to perhaps manipulate a single partical with this method in the future?
LinkBlink 3 years ago
well - we are trying to make them 25 times smaller using focused ion beam. We etch out the structures using a 1 nm large diameter beam of gallium ions. But we havent tested them, and dont know if they will be useful. Yet :)
NanoClips 3 years ago
excellent work
simbu423 3 years ago
The gripper stuff is brilliant. Don't the EM forces start to screw you about on such a tiddly scale?
Neophlegm 3 years ago 2
what scale is this?
Subspace4d 3 years ago
It sort of shows in the beginning, but the scalebars dont appear very clear. The nanotube is a big fat multiwalled carbon nanotube of more than 100 nm in diameter, and the base is covered with amorphous carbon (i.e. not nicely crystalline like nanotubes), so it appears like a cone (a fat base) rather than cylindrical. The nanotubes are typically 10 micrometer long, i.e. 1/100 of a mm.
NanoClips 3 years ago
Thanks for the answer. One more thing. Is their some possibility that we can make spheres of same diameter in the micrometer range? The preferred material should be titanium oxide.
Subspace4d 3 years ago
I dont know, but if you google titanium dioxide microsphere you get a supplier from which you can buy very nice, regular spheres in all sizes :)
NanoClips 3 years ago
This is great help thanks.
Are you doing this experiments by yourself? If yes then I have an idea of micro maschine you can build with spheres and nanowire.
I can also speak german
Subspace4d 3 years ago
No i dont do the experiments anymore - these are done by my great group of researchers, students and of course collaborators. Actually the film is recorded by a german Ph.D. student, Volkmar Eichhorn, with my master student Kenneth Carlson.
NanoClips 3 years ago
Oopps i deleted a comment by mistake...the question was :can i pick up DNA? The answer is "no", because DNA cannot stand the heat. The gripper works by expansion caused by a temperature increase. It would kill the DNA. Also the DNA is too small... we are now making grippers that are 50 times smaller than these, and which can manipulate maybe even single walled nanotubes :)
NanoClips 3 years ago
I'm more interested in what the hell kind of camera they used to capture that.
groznij 3 years ago
Great work, how complex are the nano-machines you build with the nanotubes, like how many moving parts ?
r8farm 3 years ago
Actually the grippers are too small... The genitialia of insects would be huge compared to the size of the grippers. But actually, that is a good question. I dont know the size of the penis of a housefly. Do you?
NanoClips 3 years ago
Best. Comment. Ever. XD
DeltaWound 3 years ago
can we use these as birth-control for insects?
CHIsassin 3 years ago
nanotubes have never seemed so badass
bluebishi 3 years ago
Nice music, what is it?
UWROTCIV 3 years ago
battlesnack... check myspace :)... the track is called "denialistic"
NanoClips 3 years ago
Incredible work!
nanogirl 3 years ago
awesome video.....this is the first of its kind that i have seen.....really amazed me in the sense that we can actually handpick nanotubes...
prashantyours 3 years ago
this is the first moving video footage from an electron microscope i have ever seen.
roidroid 3 years ago 2
What is the song? I must know!!
DeltaWound 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yet, nano tubes have no use at the moment. A technology that has been way ahead of its time with no use unfortunatly always dies a death.
cutterschoicenotmine 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have a use for them
captcaveman4201 4 years ago
Fascinating, thanks for sharing. Anyone know the background score?
excellr 4 years ago 2
These clips by NanoClips all have great background musics. mp3s somewhere?
Max11551 4 years ago
I did a little bit of research.
taiis d0t mymusic d0t dk
I think it's this chappy. He was credited at the end of another Nanoclip video.
plarkmoby 3 years ago
its "denialistic", check the band battlesnack on myspace
NanoClips 3 years ago
Guys. why if the nanotubes are so strong, you can break them so easy?, and secon how di you film it? SNOM? or .. how?
RavnoUK 4 years ago
possibly strong when en mass. Not as strong when it's just one fibre. As is the case with most fibres.
plarkmoby 3 years ago
when we are breaking them it disconnects from the surface on which we have grown it......in that sense we are breaking a bond between carbon and some other material ..........not a carbon carbon bond so i suppose it may be the reason
prashantyours 3 years ago
well, first of all the nanotubes only have their phenomenal strength when they are made perfectly. The nanotubes you see here have many defects... i would rate the rigidity (how stiff they are) as akin to hardened steel, and their strength perhaps 10 times higher.
NanoClips 3 years ago
someone explain to me what nanotubes and nanofibers are and what they are used in/for...
:/
MotoX88294 4 years ago
dude... better google it.. is quite complex to say in 500 caracters.
RavnoUK 4 years ago
Stop the sensless slaughter of baby nanotubes!
t4kne 4 years ago 2
yes, any time know the committee for protection of nanorobots could come and close our research facility ;-)
NanoClips 3 years ago
wow great job that looks really cool
nanotechworld 4 years ago
I would rather say just "nanoassembly" than "nanofactories"... :) its still really slow. We will need to speed the process up *a lot* to even make one-by-one assembly of AFM probes like this feasible.
NanoClips 4 years ago
This is great! I can just see nanofactories becoming reality in a few years.
jlm2525 4 years ago