man that car was going slow- the police moto escort bunched up and the ss guy ran up from the trail car and jumped up on the trunk. after the first shot or shots- kennedy is wounded in the neck, the driver actually turns around to see kennedy reacting and then boom -kennedy head is blown away -then the drive reflexes came back as he turns back around and hightails it to the er rooom. lbj and his backers all lucked out when that commie just happenned to get that job at the book depository .
the policemen on the motorcycles on the right from the saloon, already stop shortly before the shot in the head, and it looks as if they looked on the right over here to the killer! and stopped they are likely not to get in the field of fire!
This is balony because the shot "one or more" was already fired and the president was already injured by impact. Therefore this supposed shooter would not be pointing a weapon at the moment you freeze the frame. The shooter was already in motion to get out of the way of onlookers.
@seth917 ..i Have seen a couple interviews from witnesses, at the moment of the shootings a lot of people behind that pergola ( The street directly in front of the book depository that is ) didnt know what happenend, and if there was a shooter there or behind the picket fence it was not that hard to walk that direction, for example James Files said he walked that path. People running up the knol where stopped by fake Secret service people.
@seth917 The first police officer who got behind the fence encountered a man who produced secret service ID credentials so the officer left him and continued his search. There were no secret service agents assigned to the knoll area, all were accounted for in the motorcade party so clearly these credentials were fraudelent. It would seem likely this man was either a shooter or a spotter. The assassins were then able to walk away in the confusion.
This film clip is doctored. Experts from all over the world have analyzed this "badgeman" image, and have come to the conclusion that, at best, there is a slim possibility that it could've been a gunman. However, the most likely scenario, they all say, is that it is a combination of leaves, branches, shadow, and some back lighting.
those genuinely interested in sharing knowledge and ideas rarely speak down to those in need of direction.
in other words, making sure the world knows you've read a few books while speaking down to others (utter strangers, one may add) proves nothing...not to yourself or anyone else.
"know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy." -- a great man
yeah ok dumbass!! have you even seen the testimonials of eyewitnesses and FIRST HAND UP CLOSE MEDICAL TECH'S/AND COUNTLESS DOCTORS WHO GRAB THE BACK OF THE HEAD...IDK DUMBASS SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ASS BACKWARDS...BUT WHATEVER DON'T EVEN REPLY IT'LL BE DELETED B/C YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOUR TALKING ABOUT...
tippit evidence of bullets and shells etc if in court today the tippit balistic evidence would not stand scrutiny and would weaken the prosecution case if was used.
as far as foreign policy goes what i meant was LBJ was a different type of person etc and made probably different calls regarding entry into vietnam....
maybe jfk would have dealt with the carnage in a different way and viewed dialogue as away out
102blc.... tippit ....The ballistic evidence did not match Oswalds gun. The ballistic expert from the FBI concluded that it was not possible to determine whether or not the bullets had been fired from Oswalds weapon. No external physical evidence such as fingerprints or shirt fibers linking Oswald to the crime scene was established.
1,as a consequence of LBJ coming to power foreign policy was altered for the us goverment...
which may have been a factor.....
LBJ was texas favourite son and.....his phone call to the doctor dealing with oswald dying etc in the hospital was very strange in the way he ordered a confession to be got from oswald......b4 he died....
calling him the an assasin....this was later denied but proven from the switchboard lady
The ballistic evidence proved that Oswald was not the killer of Officer Tippit. Of the four bullets extracted from Tippits body, there were three Western Winchesters and one Remington Peters. Oswalds revolver (a .38)
the tough call is for people to really accept that internal usa government depts aids the killing of their own president and are complicit in the continuing cover up with the warren commission
one common comment from witnesses is the FBI omiited testiomy taken and some were not invited to the original warren report process...
102LBC ...you may have to rethink timeline of events
in these crimes etc...
officer tippet
Further the appearance of cartridge shells at the crime scene raises question for some because, according to Officer Hill, who took possession of Oswald's revolver at his arrest, the gun's six chambers were fully loaded with unspent cartridges and that Oswald had no ammunition on his person.
do you understand....in a court evidence presented has to be of a sound process of forensic science....from a scene of a crime without contamination...
Q,was the so called rifle contaminated with oswald print and fibres etc placed after its discovery...?
A, depends on the rifles timeline of posession by those who found it etc
you choose the words .flee?
officer who saw him in book dep said he was drinking coke?plce tippit was killed by another weapn as the bllets did not mtch
on the rear of the presidential limo there are 4 hand rails for 2 secret servicemen to hang onto and ride with the president to protect him from being attacked from the rear...notice there are absolutely no secret servicemen on the presidential limo at all! One secret serviceman jumps onto the back of the limo only after the fatal head shot!! why did they wait so long? they heard the first shot! they saw the president get shot in the throat! the answer...they were ordered to stand down!!!
HAHAHA your a complete moron and idiot close your mouth and you look at the evidence...since when the hell does a head move BACKWARDS if it shot from the BACK!?! it would move forward idiot!! Did it? no it went BACK AND TO THE LEFT...therefore front right...your an idiot i feel sorry for your family...
ur a complete idot, if u knew anything you would know it is possible......there's videos on ur precious youtube that will prove it...........anyways his head did go forward 1st and then he flung backwards, in slow motion and in closeup u can see this, also the limo started speeding causing him to go back....there's to much proof linking oswald to the murder,..........learn the facts before u talk
no the limo sped up after the head shot... he leaned forward with his hands by his neck cuz oswal shot him through the throat but the head shot came from the front
FACTS...OK HERE'S FACTS ASS WAD...have you even seen the testimonials of eyewitnesses and FIRST HAND UP CLOSE MEDICAL TECH'S/AND COUNTLESS DOCTORS WHO GRAB THE BACK OF THE HEAD...IDK DUMBASS SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ASS BACKWARDS...BUT WHATEVER DON'T EVEN REPLY IT'LL BE DELETED B/C YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOUR TALKING ABOUT...
No way. This photo is fabricated look in slow motion it changes shape at the last second. No more explanation as to where he was. Plus the video is focused more on the care than the grassy knoll so it couldnt have captured this photo.
notice how the limo slows down to let the head shot occur...the motorcycle police almost pass the limo!!!...AND THIS AFTER THE DRIVER HAS ALREADY HEARD AND SEEN THE FIRST SHOT!!!! HELLO OUT THERE..U DO NOT HAVE TO BE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO FIGURE CONSPIRACY!!!
If this is a sniper, why is he wearing a white shirt? Don't you think he would have worn something darker so he would blend into the dark background? Or maybe he was just a really dumb sniper.
i see this an open mind, it could be a shooter, it could be something else. This video represents one view, please can someone post the alternate view? (ie) proof it is not human?
@danouk75 If that shape is anything, its features are pretty well defined compared to the fuzziness of the wall right in front of it. Even so, it takes some imagination to render that image into a human figure, and the medical evidence doesn't support a shot from the front.
the medical evidence most certainly supports a shot from the front. the throat wound was described by doctors and nurses as an entry wound. tell-tale sign: a ring of inflamed tissue around the wound, the hallmark of a bullet entry.
2 shots in the back. 1 in the throat. 1 in the head. connally had 1 in the back and another bullet in the leg. 1 found on the gurney at parkland. 1 hole in the stemmons sign. 2 bullet holes in car. 1 bullet chipped curb under overpass. i count 10 total.
amazing, because when i watched the first half of this video i was focusing on the same spot and thought that really looks like as if somebody is aiming with a rifle (right arm lifted) and i was stunned when i saw the second half that the author had the same idea.
It really looks like a sniper in a white shirt.
What is he leaning on - this white large thing under him ? Is it a car ? Appears as if he is sitting on the hub of a white car and his right arm is leaning on the car roof.
I saw this somewhere else and it is useless.
hybridmcgee 5 days ago
man that car was going slow- the police moto escort bunched up and the ss guy ran up from the trail car and jumped up on the trunk. after the first shot or shots- kennedy is wounded in the neck, the driver actually turns around to see kennedy reacting and then boom -kennedy head is blown away -then the drive reflexes came back as he turns back around and hightails it to the er rooom. lbj and his backers all lucked out when that commie just happenned to get that job at the book depository .
larrywheels 1 week ago
@oleostrut
Bugliosi is perhaps the most arrogant individual ever to walk the planet.
His frequent failings are the result of ego triumphing over IQ.
LiquorWreckedEmGood 2 months ago
!!sorry,google translate!!
the policemen on the motorcycles on the right from the saloon, already stop shortly before the shot in the head, and it looks as if they looked on the right over here to the killer! and stopped they are likely not to get in the field of fire!
quame53 3 months ago
Why has this film not been shown before? I thought only the Zapruder film was evidence of that day
Tricksterize 3 months ago
This is balony because the shot "one or more" was already fired and the president was already injured by impact. Therefore this supposed shooter would not be pointing a weapon at the moment you freeze the frame. The shooter was already in motion to get out of the way of onlookers.
eblair12 3 months ago
@oleostrut nah, the one that made it clear how dishonest this conspiracy shit has been and how the followers are generally obsessive losers.
andrelebaron 4 months ago
Odd, man on the steps is running towards the gunman?
bobsherrick 2 years ago
Interesting point...
The question I see is which direction did the gunman leave to..? Or was there a getaway car..?
An arial view of the grassy knoll and surrounding area indicate not much room to escape..?
seth917 1 year ago
@seth917 ..i Have seen a couple interviews from witnesses, at the moment of the shootings a lot of people behind that pergola ( The street directly in front of the book depository that is ) didnt know what happenend, and if there was a shooter there or behind the picket fence it was not that hard to walk that direction, for example James Files said he walked that path. People running up the knol where stopped by fake Secret service people.
ricotermonen 1 year ago
@seth917 The first police officer who got behind the fence encountered a man who produced secret service ID credentials so the officer left him and continued his search. There were no secret service agents assigned to the knoll area, all were accounted for in the motorcade party so clearly these credentials were fraudelent. It would seem likely this man was either a shooter or a spotter. The assassins were then able to walk away in the confusion.
TonyBananas101 1 year ago 2
This film clip is doctored. Experts from all over the world have analyzed this "badgeman" image, and have come to the conclusion that, at best, there is a slim possibility that it could've been a gunman. However, the most likely scenario, they all say, is that it is a combination of leaves, branches, shadow, and some back lighting.
dipalma07 2 years ago
those genuinely interested in sharing knowledge and ideas rarely speak down to those in need of direction.
in other words, making sure the world knows you've read a few books while speaking down to others (utter strangers, one may add) proves nothing...not to yourself or anyone else.
"know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy." -- a great man
alexp9999 2 years ago
yeah ok dumbass!! have you even seen the testimonials of eyewitnesses and FIRST HAND UP CLOSE MEDICAL TECH'S/AND COUNTLESS DOCTORS WHO GRAB THE BACK OF THE HEAD...IDK DUMBASS SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ASS BACKWARDS...BUT WHATEVER DON'T EVEN REPLY IT'LL BE DELETED B/C YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOUR TALKING ABOUT...
03supto 2 years ago
fibres etc at the tippit crime scene were not found is what i was refering to
ebillyboi 2 years ago
well ive read many aspects and views......
as i said the tippet case indicates the manner at which oswald was treated had major errors of process
which in hindsight like any other major crime raise more questions as eg whether he really was the only individual involved etc
no one can read all the books etc ...
but it is clear that mistakes and errors and sources of info etc make this interesting ......
ebillyboi 2 years ago
tippit evidence of bullets and shells etc if in court today the tippit balistic evidence would not stand scrutiny and would weaken the prosecution case if was used.
as far as foreign policy goes what i meant was LBJ was a different type of person etc and made probably different calls regarding entry into vietnam....
maybe jfk would have dealt with the carnage in a different way and viewed dialogue as away out
LBJ admitted using assasination squads
ebillyboi 2 years ago
102blc.... tippit ....The ballistic evidence did not match Oswalds gun. The ballistic expert from the FBI concluded that it was not possible to determine whether or not the bullets had been fired from Oswalds weapon. No external physical evidence such as fingerprints or shirt fibers linking Oswald to the crime scene was established.
ebillyboi 2 years ago
1,as a consequence of LBJ coming to power foreign policy was altered for the us goverment...
which may have been a factor.....
LBJ was texas favourite son and.....his phone call to the doctor dealing with oswald dying etc in the hospital was very strange in the way he ordered a confession to be got from oswald......b4 he died....
calling him the an assasin....this was later denied but proven from the switchboard lady
could you imagine Obama doing such a thing?
no
ebillyboi 2 years ago
it is not ludicrous to say a conspiracy occurred
it may be a whole catalogue of errors in detective work
if a conspiracy occured it would probably be a key group or high power people pulling the strings...
is it possible ?
of course it is
ebillyboi 2 years ago 19
102LBC consider
The ballistic evidence proved that Oswald was not the killer of Officer Tippit. Of the four bullets extracted from Tippits body, there were three Western Winchesters and one Remington Peters. Oswalds revolver (a .38)
ebillyboi 2 years ago
102LBC
if two gunmen are proven from various sources
you have a conspiracy........
the tough call is for people to really accept that internal usa government depts aids the killing of their own president and are complicit in the continuing cover up with the warren commission
one common comment from witnesses is the FBI omiited testiomy taken and some were not invited to the original warren report process...
doctors,people who were there in both crimes?
ebillyboi 2 years ago
102LBC ...you may have to rethink timeline of events
in these crimes etc...
officer tippet
Further the appearance of cartridge shells at the crime scene raises question for some because, according to Officer Hill, who took possession of Oswald's revolver at his arrest, the gun's six chambers were fully loaded with unspent cartridges and that Oswald had no ammunition on his person.
so what were the shells found at the crime scene?
ebillyboi 2 years ago
also if fibres and detail as important as this is used in evidence why was really key forensic evidence which
was counter to to the warren Commision report omitted?
as you start to to see many witnesses statements
taken by FBI not used u see their are glaring mistakes in the report ....
it is not dramatic to say that this case has serious flaws in conclusion....on the contrary.....
court of today ?
tippet case for murder would be appealed for lack of evidence from balistic report on oswald
ebillyboi 2 years ago
102LBC.....
do you understand....in a court evidence presented has to be of a sound process of forensic science....from a scene of a crime without contamination...
Q,was the so called rifle contaminated with oswald print and fibres etc placed after its discovery...?
A, depends on the rifles timeline of posession by those who found it etc
you choose the words .flee?
officer who saw him in book dep said he was drinking coke?plce tippit was killed by another weapn as the bllets did not mtch
ebillyboi 2 years ago
on the rear of the presidential limo there are 4 hand rails for 2 secret servicemen to hang onto and ride with the president to protect him from being attacked from the rear...notice there are absolutely no secret servicemen on the presidential limo at all! One secret serviceman jumps onto the back of the limo only after the fatal head shot!! why did they wait so long? they heard the first shot! they saw the president get shot in the throat! the answer...they were ordered to stand down!!!
ZAPDUNGAA 2 years ago
abraham zapruder shot him
ZAPDUNGAA 2 years ago
lol
sdavistew 2 years ago
the gunman is in the depository building
the shots came from behind......if u actually take the time to study all the evidence it's very obvious Oswald was the shooter
thebody1220 2 years ago
HAHAHA your a complete moron and idiot close your mouth and you look at the evidence...since when the hell does a head move BACKWARDS if it shot from the BACK!?! it would move forward idiot!! Did it? no it went BACK AND TO THE LEFT...therefore front right...your an idiot i feel sorry for your family...
03supto 2 years ago
ur a complete idot, if u knew anything you would know it is possible......there's videos on ur precious youtube that will prove it...........anyways his head did go forward 1st and then he flung backwards, in slow motion and in closeup u can see this, also the limo started speeding causing him to go back....there's to much proof linking oswald to the murder,..........learn the facts before u talk
thebody1220 2 years ago
no the limo sped up after the head shot... he leaned forward with his hands by his neck cuz oswal shot him through the throat but the head shot came from the front
Nukemasta88 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FACTS...OK HERE'S FACTS ASS WAD...have you even seen the testimonials of eyewitnesses and FIRST HAND UP CLOSE MEDICAL TECH'S/AND COUNTLESS DOCTORS WHO GRAB THE BACK OF THE HEAD...IDK DUMBASS SOUNDS LIKE YOUR ASS BACKWARDS...BUT WHATEVER DON'T EVEN REPLY IT'LL BE DELETED B/C YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOUR TALKING ABOUT...
03supto 2 years ago
o ok then, so i that means u did that urself then right? studyd????
so u most know about all the witnesses who heard the shots from the grassy knoll??
sdavistew 2 years ago
at .:07 he gets shot in the head anywhere within that view do you see anything no one would see?
1uneek 2 years ago
No way. This photo is fabricated look in slow motion it changes shape at the last second. No more explanation as to where he was. Plus the video is focused more on the care than the grassy knoll so it couldnt have captured this photo.
1uneek 2 years ago
notice how the limo slows down to let the head shot occur...the motorcycle police almost pass the limo!!!...AND THIS AFTER THE DRIVER HAS ALREADY HEARD AND SEEN THE FIRST SHOT!!!! HELLO OUT THERE..U DO NOT HAVE TO BE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO FIGURE CONSPIRACY!!!
ZAPDUNGAA 2 years ago
i dont think conspirorist could have gotten so far as to the driver.. i mean its possible but not very likely
Nukemasta88 2 years ago
amazing, ive never seen this video before after years of jfk research
MachinaSapien 2 years ago
If this is a sniper, why is he wearing a white shirt? Don't you think he would have worn something darker so he would blend into the dark background? Or maybe he was just a really dumb sniper.
MILISA99 2 years ago
i see this an open mind, it could be a shooter, it could be something else. This video represents one view, please can someone post the alternate view? (ie) proof it is not human?
danouk75 2 years ago
@danouk75 If that shape is anything, its features are pretty well defined compared to the fuzziness of the wall right in front of it. Even so, it takes some imagination to render that image into a human figure, and the medical evidence doesn't support a shot from the front.
cengime 1 year ago
@cengime
the medical evidence most certainly supports a shot from the front. the throat wound was described by doctors and nurses as an entry wound. tell-tale sign: a ring of inflamed tissue around the wound, the hallmark of a bullet entry.
2 shots in the back. 1 in the throat. 1 in the head. connally had 1 in the back and another bullet in the leg. 1 found on the gurney at parkland. 1 hole in the stemmons sign. 2 bullet holes in car. 1 bullet chipped curb under overpass. i count 10 total.
LiquorWreckedEmGood 6 months ago
@LiquorWreckedEmGood See those two kids on the bench at 0:31. As far as I know they have never been identified. What a story they could tell.
conspiracydog11 2 months ago
It has already been proven that this was not a human.
IwshIcldstrtover 2 years ago
amazing, because when i watched the first half of this video i was focusing on the same spot and thought that really looks like as if somebody is aiming with a rifle (right arm lifted) and i was stunned when i saw the second half that the author had the same idea.
It really looks like a sniper in a white shirt.
What is he leaning on - this white large thing under him ? Is it a car ? Appears as if he is sitting on the hub of a white car and his right arm is leaning on the car roof.
DoubleR666 2 years ago