Added: 3 years ago
From: balancedaustralia
Views: 39,273
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (185)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @celtickiwi11 Fucking a married man whilst married herself is what makes her a whore! Shame they had to break up two families to be together, not to mention create a constitutional crisis. Use your brain man!

  • @celtickiwi11 No, it is not as simple as you've described at all. She's a whore because of the way she did it. Openly and without shame. She has no morals, no guilt for what she put her husband and children through, or for what she put Diana, Will & Harry through. It is not simply because "she couldn't marry Charles", it goes much deeper than that. Need a more in-depth or direct explanation? Please, ask away. Together they've created a constitutional crisis.

  • @celtickiwi11 A good example is Her Majesty's sister Margaret. She was deeply in love with a man who was considered a "commoner" whom she wanted desperately to marry. HM absolutely forbade it as he was also a divorcee. Margaret would have lost her titles and her place in line to the throne, it broke Margaret's heart. Now, why don't these ancient laws apply to HM's son who's also heir apparent? I'd love to hear your take on it. No malice intended by this post, just complete truth.

  • The Queen looks very embarrassed, 2:55.

  • @Ryanturna she does!! the poor thing, this had to me nothing less than horribly embarrassing. she didn't even attend the wedding, just the so called "blessing". that says soooooooooooo much about her real thoughts on this um, union.

  • Bloody marvelous.He looked the happiest he'd been in a long while.

  • What a farce!

  • @gx1gx That could be, but if Charles becomes King, I predict that Camila will become Queen. Excuse me, as I am going to be sick now, just thinking about it.

  • I think a deal has already been done and Charles has secretly relinquished his claim to the throne in exchange for being ‘married’ in a only Civil ceremony – It’s particularly relevant that HM the Queen did NOT attend the so called ‘marriage’ only the blessing which is worthless in law. HM the Queen puts duty above absolutely EVERYTHING else and it’s so plainly obvious that William is so much more suitable to eventually follow her rather than Charles with his whore and his mental health issues!

  • Camilla and Kate all both so elegant, they outshine Diana together.

    althought Kate is a million times prettier than Camilla.

  • Hopefully the HM the Queen will outlive this gross disappointment of a son. It’s tragically sad and plainly obvious Charles’s has genuine serious mental health problems. First we have him having regular conversations with plants; then he acquires the raddled old prostitute Camilla who’s known to have been whoring around anything available for decades. Charles (following his illegal marriage) has now very clearly demonstrated he is totally unsuitable to succeed his mother.

  • @1807H I am not bitter or nasty. If you are a woman though I am not sure you will go through the menopause. How could I be jealous of a dead woman? A woman who married a man who was unable to love her? A woman whose lovers were of such low calibre, James Hewitt wrote a book about their affair. She was loved but at the end of the day she was alone in Kensington Palace. Even her brother let her down. He was going to give her a cottage on the Althorp estate and at the last minute refused her.

  • @xda1807 Camilla family were related to the Duke of Westminister. She may hot have been titled herself. What exactly did the Earl Spencer do when he was off age. He went farming, nothing wrong with that. Stop banging on about Camilla's origins. I bet a good better grander than yours

  • Camila is absolutely marvelous

  • @summerbeach1980 Sorry your response is full of swearing and name calling, it's barely understandable. Also, I am not trying to take the world on.. you keep flooding my mail box with rubbish.I love the way everyone is to blame to you except Diana. Not being funny or anything, but with regards to Will Carling.. maybe Diana should have kept her knickers on.

  • @huwwilson651 With regard to James Hewitt.........ditto.

  • It’s all rather tragic–pitifully so! We are certainly not talking about love when it comes to either charles or the camilla whore, but simple LUST. Both have demonstrated they are highly promiscuous and camilla went with anything available and was known as ‘THE BUCKINGHAM PALACE BIKE’ to such an extent the father of her own children is questionable. Clearly, both have low morals, integrity and a total disregard for their spouses. Perhaps (hopefully) they will both die very soon!

  • @1807H You are one sick saddo. You may like to include all of the Diana-men that shared her bed in Highrove and Kensington Palace. After her panorama programme, William had a terrbible row with her and banner her and his father from coming to Founder's Day in Eton. He invited Tiggy Legge-Bourke instead. After every man crisis she ended up crying on William's shoulder, a tall order for any 10 year old boy. Stop pointing your fingers at Charles and Camilla. Grow up.

  • Look at HM's face when she's leaving..as if to say...get over it and shut the fuck up already..they're married and lets move on. Life goes on. Camilla and Charles are together and that's that.

  • @summerbeach1980 Yes it matters, and there's no need to name call. You state fiction as fact. If you can't get a simple thing like a title correct, then you obviously don't know enough to comment. Did you know that after Diana had an affair with Will Carling and he was married at the time? The Carlings divorced because of this and Julia Carling was devastated. Diana was the other woman in that marriage. Is Diana a whorish twat because of this?You don't call Diana names for what she did to Julia.

  • @huwwilson651 Yes Julia Carling did say that...

  • @irishxxkelt You really are a very sad and quite pathetic cunt. Clearly, from the rambling inaccurate nonsense you write you have only received a rudimentary education and have abysmal English skills – everything you ramble on about just demonstrates what a disgusting vile guttersnipe you are that’s why you regard the disgusting filthy poxed camilla whore as normal! Promiscuity is the signature trait of Camilla's lineage. Dirty, COMMON infested prostitutes! HM must be ever so proud of her son!

  • @xclivia Well, seeing that you use the language of the gutter you are showing that you are a low-class ignoramus. You use so many names here and post the same vile remarks to many people all over Charles-Camilla-Diana videos. We ALL REALISE THAT YOU ARE BASICALLY A NUTTER!

  • @irishxxkelt You should rename yourself irishxxTRASH - get back to thay gypo caravan you inbred filth.

  • Members of the Royal family are excepted from the provisions of the Marriage Act 1949, and their marriages in England and Wales MUST be performed by Anglican clergy. There would be no obstacle to The Prince of Wales remarrying in Scotland as did his sister The Princess Royal where the Royal Family are not excepted from the provisions of the Scottish Marriage legislation. CHARLES ‘MARRIAGE’ IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE HE REMARRIED IN ENGLAND AND HE WAS AWARE OF IT WHEN HE ‘MARRIED’ THE VILE CAMILLA WHORE

  • What a tragic embarrassment Charles must be for his parents by cavorting with the despicable Camilla. Various depraved telephone calls are published where Charles states he wants to be whore Camillas TAMPAX as he was too stupid to use a secure line. Then the legality of his 'marriage' is questionable as this was not undertaken by Anglican clergy as required under English law for members of the Royal family. The sooner these two wanton parasites are removed from the face of the earth the better

  • @irishxxkelt

    Most people know Camilla was considered to be an abomination due to her wanton promiscuous ways when a younger woman - unfortunately Charles is too stupid to comprehend that fact.

  • @xda1807 xda1807 gutter whore hasn't sucked her dog daddy's cock for 2 days and is suffering immensely now!!!!! THIS xda1807 sad pathetic CUNT will suck any cock, If her dog dad isn't available for the next 30 mins, This dog cunt will JUST DIE!!!!!!! so tell me xda1807, isn't my dung, urine, and vomit wasn't enough for you? Just sex is all you want? Just wait for your dog daddy's return. If your male prostitute dog daddy hasn't had his neck broken, he may return soon. LOLLOL

  • What a lot of nonsense. Do any of you know these people in person? No I didn't think so. So how can you talk about them as if you know them?

  • HA HA HA.....This is too funny. The Queen did not look too happy. Did anybody else know that in Camilla's family tree one of her close relatives was a MISTRESS to a High Royal? I think her grandmother or great grandmother. LMAO

  • I personally am rather happy that Prince Charles has found happiness. There is so little happiness in the world today. And living in a fish bowl as he does can not be easy. It wouldn’t surprise me that, after the Queen’s funeral (which hopefully is many years away) and a suitable period of mourning he abdicates in favor of William. Remember, he MUST become King and can only abdicate after he becomes King, although he can abdicate before his coronation.

  • Comment removed

  • she looked very nice and ceremony was tastefully done but I will still not forgive them for what they put Diana through . . .

  • I have always felt that Camilla came as part of a deal - he can have his woman so long as he abdicates in favor of William on the Queen's death.

  • @mrlopez2681 I agree with you 100%. It should be part and parcel for getting what he wanted. I can't understand why he doesn't have to relinquish his right to ascend the throne, when his great uncle had no choice but to do so for marrying the woman he loved. All due to her being a divorcee. Well Charles and Camilla are both divorcee's, has the queen made special allowances for Charles? I've always wanted to know the answer to this, can anyone help me on it?? Thanks!

  • I think it's disgusting that she is the Duchess of Cornwall. To me, she will always be the Princess of Wales. Charles and Diana divorced! Why shouldn't she be the Princess of Wales?

  • @huwwilson651 And in that same breath, you need to add that DIVORCEE'S must abdicate in order to marry a divorcee. WHY is Charles getting a special exemption from this rule eh?

  • @huwwilson651 What makes you think anyone GIVES A DAMN about what you think is disgusting. The Queen made the decision for her to go by the title of Duchess. So SHUT YOUR MOUTH about Diana. Yeah they were divorced so what...after everything they did to Diana she deserves the title of PRINCESS OF WALES.

  • It's a well known fact that camilla was promiscuous and pox raddled prior to her marriage to Parker-Bowles and consequently that rendered her unsuitable for the wife of a future sovereign. Camilla's family were of no consequence; her mother was from a family of notorious whores and her father was only an army major. The Lady Diana Spencer was a protestant VIRGIN and her father was an Earl from one of England's finest family- Her Majesty correctly rejected the REPULSIVE EVIL CAMILLA WHORE!

  • It’s not at all surprising The Queen ‘snubbed’ the wretched camilla prostitute. No one in their right mind would want that disgusting filth to kiss you knowing where its mouth had been. The manipulative and devious camilla whore then curtsied in an unsuccessful attempt to mask the rejection. The Queen has my genuine sympathy particularly as charles is such a pathetic and tragic disappointment having associated with this malicious whore. Hopefully The Queen will live longer than her mother.

  • @JuJuMJFan4life There's one flaw in your response. Camilla IS the Princess of Wales as confirmed by the Lord Chancellor in 2005. So i'm sorry you feel your triumph is incomplete!!

  • @huwwilson651 There's a flaw in your response. When William and Catherine got married they had an article saying what their new names were and in Catherine's title she Princess of Wales not Camilla. If you don't believe that go look it up.

  • @JuJuMJFan4life I have looked it up. YOU are wrong! Camilla is by virtue of her marriage to the Prince of Wales HRH The Princess Charles, Princess of Wales, Duchess of Cornwall, Duchess of Rothesay, Countess of Chester, Countess of Carrick, Baroness of Renfrew and Lady of the Isle. Please do some research before you post comments.

  • Members of the Royal family are excepted from the provisions of the Marriage Act 1949, and their marriages in England and Wales MUST be performed by Anglican clergy. There would be no obstacle to The Prince of Wales remarrying in Scotland as did his sister The Princess Royal where the Royal Family are not excepted from the provisions of the Scottish Marriage legislation. CHARLES ‘MARRIAGE’ IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE HE REMARRIED IN ENGLAND AND HE WAS AWARE OF IT WHEN HE ‘MARRIED’ THE VILE CAMILLA WHORE

  • @JuJuMJFan4life Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge. She is not a pirncess. Her princess title would be Princess William of Wales. When William and Catherine married the Queen granted William a Dukedom hence his wife is Duchess of Cambridge

  • Why he used Diana, then? Not nice.

  • and the queen wore white ummmmmmmmmmm the whole thing is hideous and yes the queen has been friends with her for many years before diana

  • Does Queen like Camilla?

  • The queen certainly does not look happy. Well, what should she expect anyway? Just look at the example Charles' parents and royal ancestors gave him. As head of the Anglican church, the queen and her husband should have done a better job at "training up their children in the way they should go." 

  • ese es tu sombrero, o son los cachos que ya te puso carlitos vieja fea, viva la princesa del pueblo viva la pricesa de corazones viva lady Diana, forever

  • This should have happened thirty years before this date.

  • @huwwilson651 If "this" would have happened "30 years before this date", it would have been a polygamous marriage now wouldn't it? She ran off and married Andrew Parker-Bowles while Charles went in the military. Seems she's never been faithful does it?

  • Sweet

  • Um video de Sonho porque o Casamento foi de Sonho e os Noivos SÃO DE SONHO, DE ENCANTAR. PERFEITO.

  • O segundo Casamento do Principe Carlos foi um verdadeiro Sonho, a Igreja de S. Jorge é algo de muito belo e tudo estava na perfeição. Para mim a casa Real Inglesa é sem dúvida a Casa Real que sabe fazer as coisas com muito SABER E CATEGORIA. A MAIOR CASA REAL DA MONARQUIA. Tem tudo os Ingleses e não precisam dos outros porque eles são um Povo SUBLIME e ÚNICO. Adorei.

  • Disappointed that they only sing one verse of 'Gode Save the Queen'. For such an occasion I thought they would sing both.

  • get the message?

    royals can do whatever that please, without being hindered by the public in any way, hahaha

    therefore you will have a camilla queen, then a kate queen

  • Quote from a British national tabloid Sunday April 4th 2010.

    " Like the Queen Mother before her, Camilla has managed to endear herself to the nation"

  • @Britanica76 You have got to be Joking ! Almost everyone in the world hates that Ugly adultress !! She is the reason that Diane was so used and abused !! Her and Charles are both a bunch of Back-stabbers . She will NEVER EVER Replace Diana in the hearts of the people !! You are in total denial of Reality !!

  • @nicktesla45 you're wrong,I'm from China and a lot of friends of mine think the love between Prince Charles and Camilla is great and respectable.Diana was not good enough for a prince because when her husband drink from the fountain of knowledge, but she just gargled ,meanwhile Camilla has the good quality to be a queen in the future.

  • @xiaobai5 That is a LIE! Prince Charles cheated on Diana and he kills little animals for sport , he is one Ugly Bastard and so is Camilla . They are no good and they deserve each other only for that reason . He is one creepy and ugly bastard with the ears of an elephant ha ha ha ha ! besides your are just a stupid Chinese and you forget what the British did to your country 100 ago ? That was by order of the Royal Crown moron !!

  • @xiaobai5 Yea and if you believe that I have a bridge in San Fransisco I would love to sell you ! People like you believe any kind of propaganda put out by those filthy Blue Bloods ! You obiously have the IQ of a goddam eggplant you dumb chink . Diana was a virgin and Camilla was a goddam adultress just like Charles and that is why God Punished them by making them as ugly as Wart Hoggs !! Most of England hates those Creeps and so does America !!

  • @xiaobai5 You're an idiot!

  • Camilla parker bowles is a disgusting gutter whore; she is like poison with everything she comes in contact with including her own children. This will all end in tears and hopefully someone will eradicate this vile cancer as soon as possible. The most pleasing aspect of this all is she cannot control HM The Queen who clearly knows how to deal with this repulsive filth and has every intention of remaining Queen regnant for her lifetime that will probably be far longer than the late Queen Mothers!

  • @xclivia

    Just you watch it ; you can be prosecuted for making rude comments about the royal family.

    The royal family's lawyer has an office in your country.

    If you go on vacation, don't pick the uk, because you won't be let in.

    Stay in South Africa.

    .

    .

    Cheers.

    from,

    del-boy

  • @MarulanChristianDior You're about the stupidest wanker ever! OMG LOL What a knob!

  • @playfulcinda They'll be coming around the mountain for you, soon.

  • These are charles NUMEROUS sex partners that was posted earlier- these are KNOWN sex partners of charles. MOST of these affairs took place during his marriage to Princess Diana! Camilla ParkerBowles Tiggy LeggeBourke Michael Fawcett(MALE) George Smith(MALE) Janet Jenkins Anna Wallace Lucia Santa Cruz Davina Sheffield Eva O'Neill Jane Wellesly Suzan George Sabrina Guiness Jane Ward Helga Wagner CLEARLY IDIOT CHARLES IS TOTALLY UNSUITABLE TO BE KING AND PROBABLY NOW RIDDLED WITH STD’S HIMSELF!

  • @xclivia don't miss use caps lock.

  • @MarulanChristianDior ummmm, "del-boy", that is about as likely as a pig with wings! omg rofl i'm so sure that the royals are going to sue anyone. slander laws don't apply to youtube, even for those in the UK. get real would you. at least you've supplied me with a good laugh, i suppose that counts for something.

  • She may not be beautiful, but she has nice hair.

  • @roses4HRHdiana And you are a work of art are you roses?

  • Long live our Prince and the new Princess of Wales.

  • @roses4HRHdiana A whore? Why do you call her that?

  • @ElledieWildAndFree Now why would goats be under a bridge? Goats live on farms don't you know?

  • @irishxxkelt Are you stupid or something??

  • She looks like she's wearing her dressing gown.

  • @ElledieWildAndFree Ellie you obviously do not know a one-off designer outfit.

  • que alquien la ponga entera por favor!

  • i thought royals are not allowed to marry a commoner like Camilla?

  • You are so out of date aren't you? Talking about things that happened over 20 years ago? The freak Diana Spencer died over 10 years ago. Everyone, including her two sons, have moved on. Why the hell can't you? Or you could do us all a favor and commit suicide. You would go to hell and meet up with Saint Diana and her homosexual pals.

  • Being English and residing in England as opposed somewhere from the backside of a liverpool gutter like your inbred self. I can state categorically I do NOT have any connection with the USA. Obviously tampax charles & the disgusting camilla whore need to be eradicated as they are detrimental to the monarchy as a whole. Charles has spent a fortune on spin but the public despise the vile syphilitic whore camilla. I notice the vile male transvestite nasilemak2008 has vanished why dont you too!

  • i too hate this wedding. anyway , is Camilla a commoner? i thought royals are not allowed to marry a commoner? please enlighten me my friend...

  • I think Diana was a commonder too. You see, according to UK Law, a commoner is anyone who is not the Sovereign or a Peer. Even some members of the Royal family are commoners. So yes, she was a commoner, but so was Princess Diana before her marriage- the lady part was a courtesy title. Hope I have helped.

  • thanks for the info...so in England royals are allowed to marry a commoner then...

  • A commoner from a suitable family. As i have said, according to English Common law, anyone who is not a peer or the Sovereign is a commonder. So not any old commoner, only a commoner from a suitable family.

  • Comment removed

  • LOL What a nutcase! We should take pity on those worthless, useless scum. Let them bow down to spencer grave and wail. Perhaps they'll want to end their misery by following Di to hell.

  • queen looks better than camilla...in dress...i really like that brooch she's wearing...never really liked that bird on camilla's head...dress is fine though

  • pacogirl12 , As a 42 year old you are a bit long in the tooth to be considered a girl !!

    Re- Selfish.

    You show your complete lack of knowledge about their royal highness's with that comment. What sort of rubbish are you reading?

    Her Royal Highness Camilla Camilla Duchess of Cornwall is a real blessing after that nutter of a first wife.

    Look to your own third world country before attacking the royal family of Australia, Canada, Gt Britain and New Zealand.

  • Why??

  • I'm heart and soul for Diana.. but I have to admit their love is strong.

  • I have the full blessing/service from St Georges Chapel: It was quite an eye opener for me.

    When I saw the Prince and Princess kneel and ask God for forgiveness for falling in love over 30 years ago, my attitude towards this lovely couple changed completely: Who am I to judge?

    She will never be a fairy Princess (quite fake and a work of fiction), but she is a Princess of the Celtic, Anglo-Saxon and allied peoples.

    Well done balancedaustralia.

  • @pedrcymro29 Oh Peter! All one of your Cowmilla fans left you a comment...Britianica76...or is that actually YOU as well? My oh my, you're hard pressed to get positive and enthusiastic comments about your ol' broad Cami, aren't you? Why is that do you think? Is it because that divorcee deceitfully worked her way into the royal family via her back? Eeeeeeew....so nasty.

  • @pedrcymro29

    Only a mardy eejit like Charles wid shag a munter like Cowmilla - the salt wid a rot mott and saggy milkers. What a moo! She's a pure minger that one! Yud have to be stoatin to shag that toerag who swills her leg openers and puffs her snouts - the lazy whore! That bam Tampon Charlie married a dirty hingoot! Oh - and I ain't no merkin neither...I'm a Scot like yew Peter!

  • Members of the Royal family are excepted from the provisions of the Marriage Act 1949, and their marriages in England and Wales MUST be performed by Anglican clergy. There would, however, be no obstacle to The Prince of Wales re-marrying in Scotland (as did his sister The Princess Royal) where the Royal Family are not excepted from the provisions of the Scottish Marriage legislation. CHARLES MARRIAGE IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE HE REMARRIED IN ENGLAND AND HE WAS AWARE OF IT WHEN HE MARRIED WHORE CAMILLA

  • @ebberlyx

    You have left that same message with the names Audrey, Clarrissa and 4 other user names.

    Is there nothing in your North American republic that can amuse you.

    As far as you writing to me to tell me that people in USA hate HRH Camilla Duchess of Rothesay......... Not according to the personal messages I get from there!!!!!

  • Its particularly sad that we have these PARASITES around. FIRSTLY WE HAVE CHARLES WHOS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED HE HAS MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND HOW TOTALLY UNSUITABLE HE WOULD BE TO SUCCEED HIS MOTHER. Then worst of all we have a vile ugly repulsive Syphilis/STD raddled old whore camilla freeloading on the country serving no useful purpose This pair both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy. Clearly only William as Princess Diana’s son is suitable to continue.

  • Members of the Royal family are excepted from the provisions of the Marriage Act 1949, and their marriages in England and Wales must be performed by Anglican clergy. There would, however, be no obstacle to The Prince of Wales re-marrying in Scotland (as did his sister The Princess Royal) where the Royal Family are not excepted from the provisions of the Scottish Marriage legislation. CHARLES MARRIAGE IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE HE REMARRIED IN ENGLAND AND HE WAS AWARE OF IT WHEN HE MARRIED WHORE CAMILLA

  • @fitzalexandra Hopefully, Her Majesty (who we understand is fortunately in exceptionally good health) will probably now live longer than her mother, by which time William will have clearly demonstrated his suitability as the next monarch. Over the next decade Charles and the wretched camilla both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy – perhaps a nasty fatal accident or some third world terrorist bomb?

  • @fitzalexandra

    It was so refreshing to read such an honest and truthful comment regarding the disgusting syphilitic camilla whore being totally unsuitable – unless of course it’s the TAMPAX queen or queen of the bordello! Clearly, Her Majesty is only too aware of the simple fact a majority of the public dislike camilla. Unfortunately for Charles his pathetic attempt to ‘spin’ the public into accepting this totally unsuitable repulsive common whore, have been largely unsuccessful.

  • What happens in your brain to post such a nasty, vindictive message?

  • A wonderful joyous day.

    Nice to see that in 2 public opinion polls, conducted throughout the United Kingdom in 2008, it was found (much to the dismay of the republicans who make up 10% of the UK population) that the Duke of Rothesay is now more popular than he has ever been.

    No disagreeable comment will change that, or change the will of the majority of Queens people - both here in Scotland and abroad.

  • @fitzalexandra joyous? for whom?

  • @mc0558 N America.... Re 'joyous? for whom?'

    Joyous for those who have a monarch as Head of State.......

    ....... I don't think you fall in to that category hun, sorry.

    Please try to be happy with your Muslim born Kenyan and leave those people who are 'Joyously' happy in a monarchy in peace you crude ill-mannered mongrel.

  • @fitzalexandra First of all, I don't know what you're talking about. Secondly, who is this Muslim born Kenyan you're talking about? The only person of my acquaintance like that was my driver in Riyadh two weeks ago, and I haven't mentioned him to anyone on this board! Secondly, why do you call me "hun"? I am neither German nor Hungarian. This message is a rampage of irrelevancies!

  • @mc0558 Spot on!