After Review I have Determane that the puck never stopped its foward motion and never came to a complete stop. The puck had FULLY Crossed the line therefor it is a GOAL
Anyone else notice that the announcer said "He was watching the fuck, he had his eye beaded right on the puck. There is no doubt about it." LOL! Good clit, errr, I mean clip. :)
he was making a reference as to how the announcers in golf watch the ball 100% until it sinks into the hole or stop ( watching the puck until it crosses the goal line or stops )
The puck didn't cease to be moving and the player didn't touch the puck after the first shot, stop the video at 0:11 sec mark and right before the goaltenders pad hits the puck you can see white on the left side of the puck, from THIS angle its a goal
i don't understand to this day how this goal is controversial. it's simple physics. watch him, the goalie moves backward. since the puck is continually moving afterward, and no forward force was exerted on the puck, there's no force that has stopped the object. it's constantly moving. as for if it crosses the line, pause at the latest moment before he touches it, full screen the video, and there is without a doubt white space between the puck and the line. no dispute. GOAL.
@Fundamenski You can't say that for sure, though. It's reasonable to assume the goalie stopped the puck, then that the forward motion was triggered by him pulling his glove backwards (which fully covered the puck) rather than the goalie never actually making contact with the puck.
@Fundamenski Clearly not. Explain using vector theory why the puck magically accelerated off the guys stick, traveled at a high velocity, then came to a near screeching halt right before the goal line, but continued to go in.
You said "No force that has stopped the object"....Have you met our dear friend Newton? "Objects in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by another force." Sure theres friction, but not nearly enough to slow the puck that much. SO tell me, what slowed it down?
@x30xSabresFan Thats exactly the point I am trying to illustrate for the half wit who thinks otherwise. Thank you for reminding me though, your input is invaluable
@Fundamenski yes from this angle it appears that there is space, but i am quite sure that it is controversial because of this angle, when they reviewed it, they used the overhead cam and it didn't completely cross the line
@OGEwoke naw, there is a NHL director who gets to watch the video and judge if it's a goal or not, he has q whole bunch of different screen and cameras to review it
@MrGanon00 wow calm down man. the puck did go all the way across the line right before the goalie hit's it with his foot. it's extremely close though so don't act like your side of the argument should be completly obvious unless someones an idiot.
Good goal in my opinion. The goalie didn't actually stop the puck because the puck still went into the net and crossed the line. Funny how that works?
@13thforswarn Lol, are you stupid? I'm a goalie. He stopped the puck, and it somehow still glided and made its way into the net. He did STOP the puck.Idiot.
@w33man2009 To be a goal, the puck MUST no longer touch the goal line, and as he quicked it out, it was still in contact with the red line. It was a good call.
@w33man2009 To be a goal, the puck MUST no longer touch the goal line, and as he quicked it out, it was still in contact with the red line. It was a good call
an over head angle would help, from this angle your eyes play tricks on u the puck could be over the line but the angle makes it look like its not, from this angle just as the goalie is about to kick it u can see a little wight inbetween the puck and the line
Unlike in American football, where a touchdown is scored if any part of the football crosses any part of the goal line, in ice hockey the entire puck must completely cross the goal line (within the goal frame) for a goal to be awarded (wikipedia). It was close but if we had HD zoom or a different camera angle, it would have been clearer. The blurry -ness makes it look like a no goal.
in soccer the ball must be entirely over the line to count as a goal. in hockey majority of the puck has to be over the line ot count. => if more than half the puck crosses the line, which it did, then its a goal.
@spidey1228 No, that's not true. In hockey, it must also completely cross the line. Case in point, the no goal that was reviewed during one of the blackhawks stanley cup losses this year. It was the overtime one.
@spidey1228 No, that's not true. In hockey, it must also completely cross the line. Case in point, the no goal that was reviewed during one of the blackhawks stanley cup losses this year. It was the overtime one.
@mariotitto no your a little fucktard you know that. the whole puck must cross the whole line for it to light the lamp. go play a sport where you know the rules you fucking queer.
@AquaGiant Listen here you no good pissy ingrate many goals count even if a bit of it is over the line get your facts straight before coming like a big shot fucking dumbass on Youtube calling me names
@mariotitto Oh im sorry 5 year olds are totally looking up these videos and reading these comments. anyways go find me a hockey rule book that doesn't say every bit of the puck must cross over the goal line to be a goal.
@jodady71 Are you crazy? The whole puck has to cross the line for it to be called a goal.
Directly from the NHL rulebook:
78.4 Scoring a Goal - A goal shall be scored when the puck shall have been put between the goal posts by the stick of a player of the attacking side, from in front and below the crossbar, and entirely across a red line the width of the diameter of the goal posts drawn on the ice from one goal post to the other with the goal frame in its proper position.
I don't think it's a goal. I'm no expert or anything, but I wouldn't allow that as a goal, because it seems to me that the puck crossed the goal line after the initial play, making the puck dead.
Hard to see from that angle if he made the save or not. He did alter the puck's direction but did not have the puck in control. On the flip side, there are no rebounds allowed in shootouts or penalty shots. Tough call.
ru dumb its still a goal have u ever seen the one on lundquvist how he gets hit in glove and tries to swat it out after it pops out but stil goes in same hting
He thought it went all the way in and all the way out, he kicked it out...hehe he said on a podcast that he was screaming at himself to get the puck when he was watching the replay. (said by himself manny fernandez) on hockey unplugged
You can subscribe to Minnesota Wild podcasts at i tunes thats where I listened to it...Hockey unplugged #8 with brent burns and manny...
I watched this a couple times. At first I thought It was a goal but then It looks like the puck stopped and as the goalie was getting up he hit it with his glove in which would make it no goal. dead play
did you hear that the commentator sayed golfball? thumbs up if ya did!
kuuston 1 month ago
@kuuston He meant to say it. Some sort of odd analogy but listen along to the rest of the sentance. Golf stuff
NHLfan96 1 week ago
who cares anymore
JiiHate 1 month ago
@socc3rchamp no it didnt, the puck has to be completely over, and the smallest portion was still on the line.
ScarFace9797 1 month ago
didnt cross the line
ScarFace9797 1 month ago
@ScarFace9797 it fully crossed stop at 0:11
socc3rchamp 1 month ago
No goal, didnt cross line.
MikiCutoo 2 months ago
lol caddyshack
MattMarier 2 months ago
After Review I have Determane that the puck never stopped its foward motion and never came to a complete stop. The puck had FULLY Crossed the line therefor it is a GOAL
JamesC666 2 months ago
@coolman17701 to suggest that its moving at a golf balls pace
artymowycz 2 months ago
At 0:11 the puck can be seen clearly across the line when he kicks it back out.
aboerstra 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people want young white females to mix with non-white males.
I made a one-minute video highlighting a very tiny sample of race-mixing advertisements.
I love white people, and I am opposed to race-mixing. But I do not hate non-whites.
If you click on my name “autumntree2011” highlighted in blue below this comment, you can watch my video.
(I'm not a fan of Hitler or KKK.)
autumntree2011 3 months ago
this is a real bad mistakes from the goaler
CharlesA24 4 months ago
Comment removed
K1NGofCRAZY 4 months ago
Thumbs up if the ad blocked the puck once it was on the goal line?
XxHxTxIxDxX 4 months ago
@XxHxTxIxDxX nope....
BalticFin 3 months ago
wasn't a goal the puck had a few milometers
theedit123 4 months ago
@theedit123 sorry but if you actually watched the game... it was a goal. Get your fact right buddy.
hockeyplayer264 4 months ago
Denis Arkhipov was the 1 who disliked this
theedit123 4 months ago
@coolman17701 its a reference to caddyshack the movie
Ducks314 4 months ago 6
Can't wait for hockey season..
David8343 5 months ago 8
haha their talking caddyshack lol
MattMarier 5 months ago 3
Goal.
QtommyQ 5 months ago
Anyone else notice that the announcer said "He was watching the fuck, he had his eye beaded right on the puck. There is no doubt about it." LOL! Good clit, errr, I mean clip. :)
kosmicwizard 5 months ago
puck never fully crosses the line
MadMacanian 6 months ago
Goal.
ghbutler 6 months ago
That really blows if your the goalie lmaooo
Lindylax821 7 months ago
@Lindylax821 why are you laughing your ass off off off?
charlie12345610 6 months ago
@coolman17701
he was making a reference as to how the announcers in golf watch the ball 100% until it sinks into the hole or stop ( watching the puck until it crosses the goal line or stops )
antiNeedleFreak 7 months ago
The puck didn't cease to be moving and the player didn't touch the puck after the first shot, stop the video at 0:11 sec mark and right before the goaltenders pad hits the puck you can see white on the left side of the puck, from THIS angle its a goal
x30xSabresFan 7 months ago
Nice to see the goalie keeping his poker face.
eAtte 7 months ago
the puck never stopped motion but didnt cross the line completley
hfunk327 8 months ago
the goolie stopped the puck, held it then dropped it to the ground as he was getting up
PBPsexMACHINE 8 months ago
The puck wasn't even in....
ITIATT 8 months ago
i don't understand to this day how this goal is controversial. it's simple physics. watch him, the goalie moves backward. since the puck is continually moving afterward, and no forward force was exerted on the puck, there's no force that has stopped the object. it's constantly moving. as for if it crosses the line, pause at the latest moment before he touches it, full screen the video, and there is without a doubt white space between the puck and the line. no dispute. GOAL.
Fundamenski 8 months ago
@Fundamenski You can't say that for sure, though. It's reasonable to assume the goalie stopped the puck, then that the forward motion was triggered by him pulling his glove backwards (which fully covered the puck) rather than the goalie never actually making contact with the puck.
mtgowns1 8 months ago
@Fundamenski Youre an idiot. Dont talk about physics like you know something.
vvbn7890 7 months ago
@vvbn7890 more than you, friend.
Fundamenski 7 months ago
@Fundamenski Clearly not. Explain using vector theory why the puck magically accelerated off the guys stick, traveled at a high velocity, then came to a near screeching halt right before the goal line, but continued to go in.
You said "No force that has stopped the object"....Have you met our dear friend Newton? "Objects in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by another force." Sure theres friction, but not nearly enough to slow the puck that much. SO tell me, what slowed it down?
vvbn7890 7 months ago
@vvbn7890 Theres a 170-200 pound goaltender standing in the crease . . .
x30xSabresFan 7 months ago
@x30xSabresFan Thats exactly the point I am trying to illustrate for the half wit who thinks otherwise. Thank you for reminding me though, your input is invaluable
vvbn7890 7 months ago
@x30xSabresFan no dip sherlock
TheFourFingers11 7 months ago
@TheFourFingers11 No one was talking to you douche so go play in traffic
x30xSabresFan 7 months ago
@x30xSabresFan Care to join me fellow asshole
TheFourFingers11 7 months ago
@Fundamenski yes from this angle it appears that there is space, but i am quite sure that it is controversial because of this angle, when they reviewed it, they used the overhead cam and it didn't completely cross the line
SARGER5 7 months ago
YES FIRST DISLIKE!
Corncrops 8 months ago
nobody knows that the puck fully stopped so cant say anything.. referees decision.
OGEwoke 9 months ago
@OGEwoke naw, there is a NHL director who gets to watch the video and judge if it's a goal or not, he has q whole bunch of different screen and cameras to review it
SARGER5 7 months ago
I'm a goalie.. If that puck did fully cross the line, it's a good goal. Puck wasn't dead yet.
hockeygoalie21 9 months ago
oh you're chicago fans, makes sense now.
MrGanon00 10 months ago
Is everybody blind? That doesn't cross the line you fucking idiots, how is it a goal?
MrGanon00 10 months ago
@MrGanon00 wow calm down man. the puck did go all the way across the line right before the goalie hit's it with his foot. it's extremely close though so don't act like your side of the argument should be completly obvious unless someones an idiot.
danhabsfan9 10 months ago
@danhabsfan9 only from this angle it appears to cross the line, it actually doesn't tho
SARGER5 7 months ago
Good goal in my opinion. The goalie didn't actually stop the puck because the puck still went into the net and crossed the line. Funny how that works?
13thforswarn 10 months ago
@13thforswarn Lol, are you stupid? I'm a goalie. He stopped the puck, and it somehow still glided and made its way into the net. He did STOP the puck.Idiot.
DehJahVuh 9 months ago
NO GOAL. puck is dead after shot and it is obtained by the goalie there is no rebounds in a shootout.
NERFPICTURES 10 months ago
@NERFPICTURES It ain't a rebound.. How can you call it a dead puck, if the dead puck went, without any action with the player, in the net?
I agree with the title, it's controversial, but I'd personally call it a goal (if the puck fully passed the line)
thedoum18 9 months ago
Have everyone hate on the hawks like usuall
zombiez13 10 months ago
didn't see the puck crossing the goal line the first time cuz the fuckin ad popped up -.-
sebbobroffa 10 months ago 4
fail
summerprince2010 10 months ago
go to like :11 and keep hitting play and pause. at one point you can see some white in front of the puck
hockey90 11 months ago
@hockey90 snow is white, and there's alot of snow especially around the crease and goaline from the goalie. Makes it even harder to discriminate.
skydome29 10 months ago
@skydome29 definetely a good goal but still..
stardustie 10 months ago
@stardustie My thinking is the nhl should have a camera (pinhole) on the bottom of the crossbar that pans down across the entire goaline.
skydome29 10 months ago
@skydome29 that shit would be wrecked after two games.
hockeyyismylife 10 months ago
@hockeyyismylife What are you even saying
skydome29 10 months ago
@hockeyforever89
True, but too bad the whole puck didn't cross the line.
NO GOAL.
msingh96 11 months ago
i didn't see it the first time cause the ad was in the way
krzie18 11 months ago
@krzie18 me too
monkeyomg 10 months ago
No goal, the puck was alive but it never fully crossed the line.
Evnted 11 months ago 2
You gotta understand, the line is big in real life, and sometimes video can't capture miraculous, physics defying events
DrKanada 1 year ago
I dunno if it ENTIRELY crossed the line. Which is important minutae
DrKanada 1 year ago
i think the puck was stopped under the goalie... but as the goalie sat up and stood up it moved the puck, it has happened to me twice before.
TheButterRidesAlone 1 year ago
The Puck did NOT cross the line and go into the net,therefore,it is NOT a goal,plain and simple!!!
Foolishpleazure 1 year ago
@Foolishpleazure That would be a fine argument except for one thing... it DID cross the line, so it WAS a goal
w33man2009 1 year ago
@w33man2009 No because it was disallowed
Foolishpleazure 11 months ago
@w33man2009 To be a goal, the puck MUST no longer touch the goal line, and as he quicked it out, it was still in contact with the red line. It was a good call.
greg2m 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@w33man2009 To be a goal, the puck MUST no longer touch the goal line, and as he quicked it out, it was still in contact with the red line. It was a good call
greg2m 11 months ago
an over head angle would help, from this angle your eyes play tricks on u the puck could be over the line but the angle makes it look like its not, from this angle just as the goalie is about to kick it u can see a little wight inbetween the puck and the line
MartinBrodeurFan30 1 year ago
Unlike in American football, where a touchdown is scored if any part of the football crosses any part of the goal line, in ice hockey the entire puck must completely cross the goal line (within the goal frame) for a goal to be awarded (wikipedia). It was close but if we had HD zoom or a different camera angle, it would have been clearer. The blurry -ness makes it look like a no goal.
insrtnameplz 1 year ago
in soccer the ball must be entirely over the line to count as a goal. in hockey majority of the puck has to be over the line ot count. => if more than half the puck crosses the line, which it did, then its a goal.
spidey1228 1 year ago
@spidey1228 No, that's not true. In hockey, it must also completely cross the line. Case in point, the no goal that was reviewed during one of the blackhawks stanley cup losses this year. It was the overtime one.
cheifaut0parts 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@spidey1228 No, that's not true. In hockey, it must also completely cross the line. Case in point, the no goal that was reviewed during one of the blackhawks stanley cup losses this year. It was the overtime one.
cheifaut0parts 1 year ago
@spidey1228 no it's not...the whole puck must cross
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@spidey1228 fail...i think u need to read the rule again :)
bigguyrobbie 1 year ago
@spidey1228 ahhh ha hah ah ha ha ha ha ha ha thats funny maybe you should be a ref or a replay official
00ReLLiK 1 year ago
@spidey1228
LOL ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
The whole puck has to cross the line, just like in your beloved soccer.
Learn the rules dummy.
msingh96 11 months ago
@spidey1228 wow man. you are just plain retarded if you think that. jesus christ.
hockeyyismylife 10 months ago
Puck must be completely across the line = u must be able to see white space between the puck and the line. Can't see that in this video.
gman1868 1 year ago
@gman1868 yes u can
penguinlord992 1 year ago
@gman1868 well hd would help this video is shit
10bruinsfan10 1 year ago
the whole puck has to cross the line to be good i remember this was called a no goal
1219sharks 1 year ago 74
@1219sharks No not the whole puck a bit of it has to cross to be a goal
mariotitto 1 year ago
@mariotitto no your a little fucktard you know that. the whole puck must cross the whole line for it to light the lamp. go play a sport where you know the rules you fucking queer.
AquaGiant 1 year ago
@AquaGiant Listen here you no good pissy ingrate many goals count even if a bit of it is over the line get your facts straight before coming like a big shot fucking dumbass on Youtube calling me names
mariotitto 1 year ago
@mariotitto Oh im sorry 5 year olds are totally looking up these videos and reading these comments. anyways go find me a hockey rule book that doesn't say every bit of the puck must cross over the goal line to be a goal.
AquaGiant 1 year ago
@1219sharks dumb refs
nickdawg13 1 year ago
@1219sharks it did cross the line completely..LOL! but oh wells..im not a fan of either of the teams so whatever :P
Rey123Duncan 11 months ago
@1219sharks The whole puck is across the line.
Sunderlanding 8 months ago
@1219sharks no just a square centimeter can cross
jodady71 3 months ago
@jodady71 Are you crazy? The whole puck has to cross the line for it to be called a goal.
Directly from the NHL rulebook:
78.4 Scoring a Goal - A goal shall be scored when the puck shall have been put between the goal posts by the stick of a player of the attacking side, from in front and below the crossbar, and entirely across a red line the width of the diameter of the goal posts drawn on the ice from one goal post to the other with the goal frame in its proper position.
FreakyShinnizle 2 months ago
well over half the puck crossed that line, obvious goal
Denis543 1 year ago
Tough to tell from the angle if it was in or not. Angles can always be misleading. If there was an overhead view we would have known 100%.
sTyLnK 1 year ago
NO GOAL the puck is a sphere so if you see a white space it doesnt mean that it's a fucking goal bitch
NO GOAL FUCK GO HABS GO
MsImdoingyourmom 1 year ago
a sphere is a ball. the puck is not a ball. habs will be swept in the first round again this year.
richy2k0 1 year ago
@MsImdoingyourmom lol habs
striker265 1 year ago
This is definitely a goal. If it hits the goalie anywhere and it bounces in, it counts, and this is no different.
Aceofbucketandspades 1 year ago
the whole puck did not cross
broggi230 2 years ago
Yeah, the puck crosses the line due to its initial momentum, with no influence from Arkhipov. That def. should be a goal.
jimih64 2 years ago
goal
puckhog00 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In a shootout rebounds don't matter. Once the initial save is made, it's dead. There are no whistles on shootouts.
ApachePiL0T 2 years ago
It wasn't a rebound, they player never touched it again after the initial shot. The play is dead when the puck stops.
GOAL.
hockeyforever89 2 years ago 63
@hockeyforever89 the only issue is did the puck completely cross? kinda tough to tell from there
83Oil88ers89 1 year ago
@hockeyforever89 No goal, no matter how they stopped it, the goalie stopped it. Right before ALL of it went over.
mounsteres 9 months ago
@hockeyforever89 no the play is dead when the refs blow it dead
KingsFanSince95 8 months ago
@hockeyforever89 but the ref probably blew the whistle, we didnt get any audio of the game
xkillingxtime 7 months ago
its a goal
u are pretty much saying that the puck cannot hit the goalie for it to be a goal
if the goalie were to catch and fall into the net its a goal. so this is the same its just that the puck was on the ice
gsjonny 2 years ago
goal
Unstoppablegoalie 2 years ago 2
isnt that roloson in net?
coolkid673 2 years ago
its manny fernandez
Loompa7 2 years ago
When was the whistle blown? In the end, that's what counts the most.
AtariMeanStreak 2 years ago
Not really because its when the ref intended to blow the whistle
DCShoesSkater 2 years ago
the problem was a review wasn't even given
DragonSniper7 2 years ago
yes there was
plunky93 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's a goal morons start pausing and playing non stop at 0:09 untill 0:11 you will see
soccer3188 2 years ago
geez. that sucks.
mickiew4 2 years ago
goal you can see white all around the puck
capitals4life1 2 years ago
No Goal imo but wish there was a overhead
jimmyobi 2 years ago
No goal, it didn't completely cross. It was still just barely on the line.
MrStarfisho 2 years ago
You could see white.
Freecell82 2 years ago
I remember watching this live the puck was off of the ground.
Flawless0straint 2 years ago
didnt even go all the way accross?
Snakeman7720 2 years ago
NOPE no goal
drewedeniscool 2 years ago
GOAL!!!!!!
Jay333 2 years ago
no goal
DustyDinkleman26 2 years ago
I don't think it's a goal. I'm no expert or anything, but I wouldn't allow that as a goal, because it seems to me that the puck crossed the goal line after the initial play, making the puck dead.
sdude55 2 years ago
pause at 0:13 it's in the net fully.
Boehm92 2 years ago
didn't cross the line
turreu 2 years ago
0:11 it looks like it got all the way across the line before he kicked it out.
ShadowNHL 2 years ago
goal
kmfkt 2 years ago
hes so chill when he kicks it away
lahnaclannb 2 years ago
never crossed teh line...sorry pal
whiteandproud52 2 years ago
it did. I may be wrong though. I think half of it crossed the line, which wouldn't count as a goal.
gerbilplay4 2 years ago
Can go in either way
Intercity101 3 years ago
ooo thats a goal
bmac63095 3 years ago
it was just 3/4 over the line
no goal
but regardless, goalie pulled a bacon lol
alexanderthegreat100 3 years ago
GOAL. the puck went over the line. P.S. you can argue both ways
sportyedge101 3 years ago
0:11 clearly a goal
raidershockey14 3 years ago
no doubt that was a goal
Kartracer6 3 years ago
it wasn't over the line watch carefuly
turreu 3 years ago
HAAH. what a terd
evanl6 3 years ago
no goal
DustyDinkleman26 3 years ago
it was not given a goal as the play had been blown dead.
springbokk4life 3 years ago
i dont think it went over the whole line
noobdestroyer1223 3 years ago
When the wistle blows, the play is over. This is why deaf people aren't allowed to play sports. The game would never end...ha!
alerokilla419 3 years ago 2
it was no goal. i saw it! plus the wild won
yeah!!!!!!!!!
BeastyBeastking 3 years ago 2
Hard to see from that angle if he made the save or not. He did alter the puck's direction but did not have the puck in control. On the flip side, there are no rebounds allowed in shootouts or penalty shots. Tough call.
negativity 3 years ago
and the rebound shot is...where?
VancouverCanucksRock 3 years ago
it was a penalty shot
muskoka5 2 years ago
the puck is still moving backwards...goalie never stops it...goal!
Xp1e8o 3 years ago
how was that no goal?
SIMIHIGH2008 3 years ago
so what did the zebras rule it? goal or no goal?
GavinKing66 3 years ago
It went in, but he saved it first.
No goal.
03Crazy 3 years ago
it doesn't matter if he saved it first it's still a goal if he accetendly put it in the net it is ruled as a goal
oilersrock10and32 3 years ago
ru dumb its still a goal have u ever seen the one on lundquvist how he gets hit in glove and tries to swat it out after it pops out but stil goes in same hting
kewlnsimpguy 3 years ago
no goal... he made the save
RANGERSRULE13 3 years ago
idiot it is a goal no problem u make a save and it goes in in a real game its in in a shoot out 2
kewlnsimpguy 3 years ago
what are you talking about he made the goal didn't you see the puck go in.
Kartracer6 3 years ago
he should have got that but it was *NO* goal
wildfan109 3 years ago
Hahaha acting like the shootout was over..
haroonaftab 3 years ago
HaHa...GO BLACKHAWKS!
MasterOfPuppets1140 3 years ago
it obvisly went in'
ilovehardball23 3 years ago
It's hard to see from that angle, mainly because the puck disappears.
youvebeenthunderstru 3 years ago
He thought it went all the way in and all the way out, he kicked it out...hehe he said on a podcast that he was screaming at himself to get the puck when he was watching the replay. (said by himself manny fernandez) on hockey unplugged
You can subscribe to Minnesota Wild podcasts at i tunes thats where I listened to it...Hockey unplugged #8 with brent burns and manny...
go wild!!!
MNWild1012 3 years ago
I watched this a couple times. At first I thought It was a goal but then It looks like the puck stopped and as the goalie was getting up he hit it with his glove in which would make it no goal. dead play
SmarkFishynsky 3 years ago
its a goal, he cant put in his own rebound, but the puck is live until the ref blows his whistle
KingOfTheCrease1 3 years ago
NO GOAL...
sabres076 3 years ago
No Goal the Goalie Made The Save And Stood Up And The Puck slide For 3 Seconds Into the Net it Couldnt Of Been Helped
SabresFan120 3 years ago
Puck was never in the goalies control, the puck was still live, it's a goal.
Virauge 3 years ago
he thought it went then he was like oh shit!
lol
it looked in to me
FSAS15 4 years ago
definetly no goal
wildfan353 4 years ago
he must of thot he was already beat, and thot the puck slid back from the netting. i