What a douche bag this clown congressman is...Barking out the same old ultra lame NRA horse shit...It's the crazy guy who's the problem...OK, then how did a crazy guy pass the initial FBI check? Oh. that's right...the fucking NRA "opposed" that...Now they want to stop the "gun haters" who want to enact the no 30 ct clips law...I have guns! I wouldn't do without them...EVER...This is just going to get REALLY ugly...
Anyone notice how AZ shooter is as Mr. OD posits: genuine lone nut - and thus absolutley unlike one Mr. Lee Oswald - as I make sure to call him, out of respect to his daughters. And unlike Charles (here, a middle name is needed)Whitman, whose 1966 Tex tall bldg sniper-ism confirmed notions of Mr Oswald as simliar & genuine. Still Trent, think: which has come farther since 66, gun control or mental illness treatment-control? Both help Whitmans, Loughners. But one job's easier. Next check in 2056
@newsmanbluesman Trent Franks brother Travis Franks just stalked me and my family. I shit you not. I am a Republican. Don't vote Trent Franks... his family will attempt to buy yours.
Once you encroach on the 1st amendment(god and religion is something bible thumping conservatives have no problem pushing), your 2nd amend can be encroached upon too.
^ that is what they are trying to do. We need those 'clips' to shoot at the tyranny. O'Donnell wants more gun controls is because he is probably a tyrant-wanna-be. Also, McCarthy is a tool who was trying to ban something that she didn't know what it was. She keeps saying she isn't trying to take away our gun rights and claiming hunters do not need 30rd 'clips.' I read the 2nd Amend so many times that I didn't even see the word 'hunters.' Am I missing something?
O'Donnell doesn't realize that this guy committed a CRIMINAL ACT. Even if there was a law on hi-cap mags, you don't think he would have gotten a 30 round clip illigally? He got the handgun illigally. Criminals don't follow laws, hence the reason they are called criminals. All those gang members in LA have illigal weapons. Maybe they don't know it's illigal, maybe O'Donnel should tell them.
Well Done, Lawrence! Kudos! This guy, like many, refuse to answer the tough questions because they get lobbyist money! Only police and military should be allowed to have such a gun clip. It's totally ridiculous, lazy gun owners don't want to reload smaller clips....booo hooo! Keep up the good work Lawrence, even if these idiots won't answer the questions!
@TheDaffy9 When a gunman follows the law to kill people with a 10rd mag, then do you want to ban 10rd mag? Do you see what's happening in the Middle East where the police and military have more firepower than the citizens? This is what the 2nd Amend is all about. Sure, the government can bomb/nuke us. Don't you at least want something to fight back when your government is corrupt. Now they want to ban 30rd, then 10rd. Once they take away the 2nd Amend, your 1st Amend can be taken away, too.
And O'Donnell is full of it too. Those 33 round magazines were still legal to own, use, sell and buy during the AWB. I bought a few, legally, from gun stores during that silly ban. Not this guy, or any other, can point to any evidence whatsoever that the AWB did anything to prevent crime in any way.
What a bullcrap question. That's no different that saying "Don't you wish he had a .22lr pistol instead of a 9mm pistol" That's where it will go next. Make it only 10 rounds, then the next proposed ban will be to limit magazines to 5 rounds after a shooting where a 10 round mag is used, then to non military calibers, like .380 or .22. O'Donnell is a fool and an admitted socialist.
What is an ammunition clip? None of my guns came with clips. They came with magazines. These idiots don't even know the terminology of what they are trying to ban. Taking away normal capacity magazines is just the beginning of more and more stringent anti-gun legislation. We have to stop it NOW!
criminals love when no one else at the scene has a gun. they can do as they please. o'donnell is seriously an idiot. he gets so emotional and throws logic and reasoning right out the window.
That filthy Franks is trying to protect the profits of bullet manufacturers. If you want progress from the right; just pay them money under the table.
He got owned. O'Donnell was not even proposing to take guns away from everyone, why would Trent even say that? He knew he'd been had, and tried to save whatever face he had left.
@skyzefawlun I think O'Donnell looked like a pushy fool. Those magazines were still legal throughout the AWB, including 2003. According to the FBI, these "hi-cap" magazines and the guns that use them are used far less often to murder than the average shotgun used for hunting or the .25ACP pocket pistol that only holds 7 or 8 rounds. A magazine ban will in no way prevent this from happening again. A total gun ban would not prevent it either. It will happen again, no matter what the law says.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I just watched a small piece of this on a Young Turks video where they are making this reporter out to be a saint for some reason. This reporter is clearly a moron and an arrogant jerk from what I can gather. He clearly has a problem with Franks and no matter what he says O'Donnell is going to twist it around and screw it up. Reckless? There was nothing reckless about what this man said, in fact, he is making a valued effort to not be. O'Donnell is being a class A prick.
@falcoperegrinus82 I don't generally agree with anything righ-wing either but I really don't see anything wrong with what he said in this one. Even if he would have said "Yes, I do wish the shooter would not have had a 30 round magazine" i don't see what point it would have made unless he fears the NRA for some reason. I think badgering him to say that was a waste of an interview. The entire thing seemed kinda pointless and the reporter was acting like Megyn Kelly in this one.
@123Larra What the congressman said was willfully ignorant dishonest nonsense; there's plenty wrong with it. Was the news guy being a bit pushy? Maybe, but Franks totally deserved it in my opinion because railing against banning 30 round clips is sickening and indefensible. I think the news guy totally knew he would not answer that question. Making him sweat and dance around the issue was exactly what he wanted him to do.
@falcoperegrinus82 Larry is clueless on this topic as he is with everything else. Let us pretend that another law limiting magazine capacity to 10 rounds passed. Let us also pretend that the millions of them that are in existance now, disappeared. With practice, anyone can do what the man in this youtube video entitled, "The fastest clip you'll probably ever see". NOW WHAT BITCHES? What will you ban next to combat that? There will be no magazine ban Larry. Deal with it.
I wonder how many of these gun loving nuts have young kids. I wonder if they have kids and lost one of them to a bullet fired from a gun obtained by a madman if their views towards gun control would change.
When I think of so many people on these News Interview programs - It is amazing how many just Will Not Answer an easy Yeh or Nay question. They have to, like Robots, spin their talking points. It pissed O'Donnell off a bit, which isn't hard to do. But Damn - just answer a Simple Question, Mr. Franks !! It has nothing to do with Rep & Dem.
What a joke Franks is. Lol. Not only is he the typical, dumb, anti-intellectual, corporate shill Republican, he's also a typical cowardly Republican. He can't stand up for his fuckin' votes 'cause he's a yellow chicken. Ergo, the Republican Party is a joke.
O'Donnell's logic is flawed. He was asking a loaded hypothetical question which doesn't address the root cause of the incident. You can't go back and change what happened. If it was Loughner's goal to get as many rounds off without reloading. He could have brought multiple guns already loaded. He could have used a submachine gun or assault rifle instead of a high capacity clip. O'Donnell was trying to get the congressman to admit the gun/ammo was the cause by repeated asking his loaded question.
JewsinUranus: Of course Lawrence asked a trap question. If Franks wanted to come out not looking like a fool he should have said "Yes I support citizens having extended clips, it's unfortunate people like Lafter who was allowed to make such a purchase." or "Yes I wish he didn't have an extended clip, but banning clips would not have made a difference." Those would have been acceptable answers, but he just refused to answer the question and bring God into equation or how dare you ask me that!
@mechredd Lol! Absurd. You have to go back 85 years to some insanely obscure event? Wow. You got good judgement. Well, I'll give you this: You sure know how to repeat your NRA, paranoid tea-bagger talking points. Do they hand out treats after you perform like a good drone?
I don't know if he's in the NRA, but when it comes to the NRA vs. Brady, ALL of the statistical data gathered by non biased groups including the government, support the NRA. You can deny that all you want, but once you do some of your own research, you'll find that it's true. But you're a zombie who can't think for himself, after all, a curd is rotten.
I used to be a liberal like you, but then a few things happened that changed my outlook on life. I came to realize among other things, that there is evil in this world, and no law will stop it from doing what it wants, and that much of it stems from the law makers. You can outlaw weapons, but criminals will still get them, after all, criminals by definition don't obey the law. Loughner was determined to kill people, he would have found a way.
@mechredd Lol! Sorry, your assertions don't make sense. That's why the grand dummy Franks, that folks like you voted for, could NOT answer the question. He looked like a pathetic, excoriated lil' sick puppy to everyone with a brain. These facts in combination with your unsolicited political background story, proves to me that you, like 99% of the Tea-Party, vote by fear and faith instead of facts.
First off, I'm not a tea-party member, secondly, I didn't vote for this guy,and thirdly, fear and faith have nothing to do with how I vote. I vote based upon fact, and usually end up voting democrat.
When it comes to the 2nd amendment, the fact is that we have a right that the government has been trying to take away for years. You don't have to exercise that right, but you don't have the right to take it away from those who do lawfully exercise it.
@mechredd Franks didn't answer the question for he feared the pious wrath of the gun-nuts. He couldn't answer the question because he knew the facts were stacked against him. He also knew that if he gave a truthful response, all of the gun-worshiping nuts would come out in zealous, wild-eyed fear and burn him at the stake for offending the great Gun-God and his flock of lemmings.
How do my assertions not make sense? There is not a single documented case of a gun control law saving a life. There are however thousands of police reports of criminals using outlawed weapons to commit crime. You claim to make decisions based on facts, well the facts are there for everyone to see if they're willing to look, and they contradict the anti-gun argument. This is part of the reason that the BCEGV is losing members and influence, the facts don't support their claims.
@mechredd Lol! You're a birther? That proves you're delusional and your brain works on faith not facts. Don't bother me anymore, gun-worshiper. Can your glassy-eyed, delusional mind at least accomplish that easy, rudimentary task? Please & thank you. I have no interest in what you have to say. Arguing with a birther is about as constructive as trying to convince an insane asylum resident that a chair isn't a table. It's useless, 'cause their mind isn't rooted in reality.
It's just to show that gun or not, a killer will find a way to kill.
Another example of this was the failure of the assault weapons ban. It didn't affect violent crime rates. On the other hand the FBI reports that soon after it ended, there was a marked decrease in total violent crime overall, and gun related deaths. Reported home invasions and attempted robberies that were thwarted by gun owning citizens have increased, according to police and the FBI records.
What O'Donnell doesn't realize is that criminals don't obey the law. Most gun crimes in this country are committed by known criminals who can't legally obtain a firearm, but they get them anyway. Magazine laws won't reduce crime or body counts, especially when reloading is so easy. The main reason why Loughner wasn't able to reload was because of the extended magazine. It is easier and faster to reload the small ones. Most people can fire 6 10rd magazines faster than they can 2 30's.
Lawrence O'Donnell is a true creditable voice of reason and for the left wing. I just find this Congressman Trent Franks a joke when he refuses to answer his question several times, and still believes that all types of guns should be allowed into the hands of the average citizen. What makes matters worse, he tries to change the subject talking about God or claims because we questioned about why such a man had a gun, it has to be political. This guy is clearly an assclown to the 10th degree.
AWESOME! Home run Lawrence. This is exactly why you cant talk to these people. Guns are their vice and they protect them with.....religion? wow,what a backward mass of idiots the right are. Looove the last comment at franks.."dont be silly",lol. seems only the left really care about human life,shame really
o'donnell is a fucking idiot , do you think by banning certain guns or certain gun clips that somehow that will stop someone from getting their hands on them , if he believes that then he's fucking dumber than i thought he was
@cocobear33 Maybe it would? Why not play the safe side and possibly save lives that could be loss. Why do you need 31 bullets so bad??? If your not going to shoot people then why does it matter if you have to reload at 10 instead of 31?
A BULLET IS A BULLET! a 9 mm can PENETRATE 3 - 4 skulls. so if, let's just say, 3 people stood in a row, he would still have been able to kill the same amount of people with a 10 round mag, as he would with a 31 round mag. PLUS HE'D HAVE ONE MORE TO HIMSELF..
so, WHY DOES IT FUCKIN' MATTER?!
a gun, is a gun. and a psycho, is a psycho.
A GUN IS MERELY A TOOL (that CAN KILL OF CORSE, but other things, THAT AREN'T ILLEGAL, CAN JUST AS WELL...!!) :P
@CosmicApe2 I know right? They want stricter laws to make sure mentally ill people don't get their hands on guns, but don't support health care... how the hell are we suppose to pay for it then?
yup, rep. franks believes people should be looked upon as children of god when it fits his purposes or if they're gay, then they're to be looked upon as something else. franks is a damned hypocrite!
franks has always had respect for human life only when it comes to his kind of "christian" human life. if they don't meet his ideas, then they can be treated as 2nd class citizens, i.e. DADT & marriage equality.
give me a break, the man's just another a lying "christian"republican hypocrite!
He simply does not want to recognize the fact that if Laughner had smaller clips, fewer people would have died and been injured. He simply can not acknowledge it, because to acknowledge it is to admit he's wrong and he'll have the NRA and his conservative voters coming after him.
A bunch of blinded hypocrites living with unrealistic, antiquated rules of law, not fit for modern society.
As far as I know, not one of these mass murdering psychopaths has been stopped by another citizen with a gun. Not one. So what is the point of allowing even more guns to be made available in more places ?
Granted, it has been politicized. Granted, this guy's motive was not likely Sarah Palin, etc... He was clearly acutely mentally ill - not your garden variety "a little off" - but genuinely psychotic and from his symptoms, likely a paranoid schizophrenic. The issue is NOT his lack of respect for "children of god" - this issue is crazy ass people having access to weaponry and extended clips.
The NRA is among Franks' campaign contributors. Who could have predicted that?
AKSBSU 1 month ago
What a douche bag this clown congressman is...Barking out the same old ultra lame NRA horse shit...It's the crazy guy who's the problem...OK, then how did a crazy guy pass the initial FBI check? Oh. that's right...the fucking NRA "opposed" that...Now they want to stop the "gun haters" who want to enact the no 30 ct clips law...I have guns! I wouldn't do without them...EVER...This is just going to get REALLY ugly...
deetjay1 1 month ago
Republicans are fucking children...children of god?..what a fucking arsehole
pieter292 1 month ago
it takes less then 3 seconds to change a magazine you idiot!!!!
punkrockford 3 months ago
Anyone notice how AZ shooter is as Mr. OD posits: genuine lone nut - and thus absolutley unlike one Mr. Lee Oswald - as I make sure to call him, out of respect to his daughters. And unlike Charles (here, a middle name is needed)Whitman, whose 1966 Tex tall bldg sniper-ism confirmed notions of Mr Oswald as simliar & genuine. Still Trent, think: which has come farther since 66, gun control or mental illness treatment-control? Both help Whitmans, Loughners. But one job's easier. Next check in 2056
newsmanbluesman 9 months ago
@newsmanbluesman Trent Franks brother Travis Franks just stalked me and my family. I shit you not. I am a Republican. Don't vote Trent Franks... his family will attempt to buy yours.
insightllc 7 months ago
I just found out this guy is in my voting district. Sorry, I'll try to spread this video and help turn my state blue!
guitarded459 10 months ago
Once you encroach on the 1st amendment(god and religion is something bible thumping conservatives have no problem pushing), your 2nd amend can be encroached upon too.
uFlubber 11 months ago
30rd ---> 10rd ---> 1rd ---> 0rd
^ that is what they are trying to do. We need those 'clips' to shoot at the tyranny. O'Donnell wants more gun controls is because he is probably a tyrant-wanna-be. Also, McCarthy is a tool who was trying to ban something that she didn't know what it was. She keeps saying she isn't trying to take away our gun rights and claiming hunters do not need 30rd 'clips.' I read the 2nd Amend so many times that I didn't even see the word 'hunters.' Am I missing something?
ustfu 1 year ago
@ustfu slippery slope fallacy.
cardnals100 11 months ago
@ustfu Yeah you are missing an IQ
pieter292 1 month ago
O'Donnell doesn't realize that this guy committed a CRIMINAL ACT. Even if there was a law on hi-cap mags, you don't think he would have gotten a 30 round clip illigally? He got the handgun illigally. Criminals don't follow laws, hence the reason they are called criminals. All those gang members in LA have illigal weapons. Maybe they don't know it's illigal, maybe O'Donnel should tell them.
ernestdecker789 1 year ago
Where did personal responsibility go? I've never seen so many people play the blame game in my entire life.
Roxas3310 1 year ago
MY 30 ROUND MAGAZINE HAS NEVER KILLED ANYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cbassfishin 1 year ago
Ohh, I see MSNBC havefound their new Olbermann... he takes no prisoners..loving it.
Avenue72nd 1 year ago
Well Done, Lawrence! Kudos! This guy, like many, refuse to answer the tough questions because they get lobbyist money! Only police and military should be allowed to have such a gun clip. It's totally ridiculous, lazy gun owners don't want to reload smaller clips....booo hooo! Keep up the good work Lawrence, even if these idiots won't answer the questions!
TheDaffy9 1 year ago
@TheDaffy9 When a gunman follows the law to kill people with a 10rd mag, then do you want to ban 10rd mag? Do you see what's happening in the Middle East where the police and military have more firepower than the citizens? This is what the 2nd Amend is all about. Sure, the government can bomb/nuke us. Don't you at least want something to fight back when your government is corrupt. Now they want to ban 30rd, then 10rd. Once they take away the 2nd Amend, your 1st Amend can be taken away, too.
ustfu 1 year ago
@ustfu Oh do fuck off retard
pieter292 1 month ago
Larry just proved he knows as little about guns as he does about everything else. What a moron.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
And O'Donnell is full of it too. Those 33 round magazines were still legal to own, use, sell and buy during the AWB. I bought a few, legally, from gun stores during that silly ban. Not this guy, or any other, can point to any evidence whatsoever that the AWB did anything to prevent crime in any way.
CarbonGrips 1 year ago
What a bullcrap question. That's no different that saying "Don't you wish he had a .22lr pistol instead of a 9mm pistol" That's where it will go next. Make it only 10 rounds, then the next proposed ban will be to limit magazines to 5 rounds after a shooting where a 10 round mag is used, then to non military calibers, like .380 or .22. O'Donnell is a fool and an admitted socialist.
CarbonGrips 1 year ago
What is an ammunition clip? None of my guns came with clips. They came with magazines. These idiots don't even know the terminology of what they are trying to ban. Taking away normal capacity magazines is just the beginning of more and more stringent anti-gun legislation. We have to stop it NOW!
Glasgow1270 1 year ago
criminals love when no one else at the scene has a gun. they can do as they please. o'donnell is seriously an idiot. he gets so emotional and throws logic and reasoning right out the window.
jgiblin3 1 year ago
I don't think that respect for human life would have made
him any less crazy.
GlassAgate 1 year ago
A chimpanzee body guard armed with a bazooka would be nice.
jarhewes1 1 year ago
according to odonnell the idiot, pencils must mispell words not the writer
Hardliner1269 1 year ago
I loved when Trent said 'so let's just take away guns from all cops?' or 'what if he had brought a bomb?'
awesome takedown of stupid aXX odonnell
Hardliner1269 1 year ago
@Hardliner1269 A chimpanzee body guard armed with a bazooka would be nice.
jarhewes1 1 year ago
Trent Franks for 2012
Way to go...I guess Trent had the last word with liberal troll lawrence odonnell
Hardliner1269 1 year ago
Trent is a child of God?
cheddyrod 1 year ago
That filthy Franks is trying to protect the profits of bullet manufacturers. If you want progress from the right; just pay them money under the table.
newmac 1 year ago
This guy is concerned on what is right or left and not what is right or wrong. This is just pathetic!
likeroby 1 year ago
how'd this guy ever get a vote?
dudeeful1 1 year ago
hahaha children of go`d? in theUS`? fuck no, nothing there but children of the devil
nela04 1 year ago
O'Donnell is such a badass. Franks is a moron and got destroyed here.
Cerberus5159 1 year ago
"Don't be silly."
He got owned. O'Donnell was not even proposing to take guns away from everyone, why would Trent even say that? He knew he'd been had, and tried to save whatever face he had left.
k0d14k1 1 year ago
Yeah Trent... I'm sure if we had all had a big group hug that morning, nobody would have died.
Fuck this guy, seriously. O'Donnell just absolutely humiliated him on public television. If I was his son I'd change my name.
skyzefawlun 1 year ago 6
@skyzefawlun I think O'Donnell looked like a pushy fool. Those magazines were still legal throughout the AWB, including 2003. According to the FBI, these "hi-cap" magazines and the guns that use them are used far less often to murder than the average shotgun used for hunting or the .25ACP pocket pistol that only holds 7 or 8 rounds. A magazine ban will in no way prevent this from happening again. A total gun ban would not prevent it either. It will happen again, no matter what the law says.
CarbonGrips 1 year ago
omg and he praises sarah palin what a fuckin joke
montroclq 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I just watched a small piece of this on a Young Turks video where they are making this reporter out to be a saint for some reason. This reporter is clearly a moron and an arrogant jerk from what I can gather. He clearly has a problem with Franks and no matter what he says O'Donnell is going to twist it around and screw it up. Reckless? There was nothing reckless about what this man said, in fact, he is making a valued effort to not be. O'Donnell is being a class A prick.
123Larra 1 year ago
@123Larra No way man, Frank's areguments were typical right wing, meritless drivel.
falcoperegrinus82 1 year ago
@falcoperegrinus82 *arguments
falcoperegrinus82 1 year ago
@falcoperegrinus82 I don't generally agree with anything righ-wing either but I really don't see anything wrong with what he said in this one. Even if he would have said "Yes, I do wish the shooter would not have had a 30 round magazine" i don't see what point it would have made unless he fears the NRA for some reason. I think badgering him to say that was a waste of an interview. The entire thing seemed kinda pointless and the reporter was acting like Megyn Kelly in this one.
123Larra 1 year ago
@123Larra What the congressman said was willfully ignorant dishonest nonsense; there's plenty wrong with it. Was the news guy being a bit pushy? Maybe, but Franks totally deserved it in my opinion because railing against banning 30 round clips is sickening and indefensible. I think the news guy totally knew he would not answer that question. Making him sweat and dance around the issue was exactly what he wanted him to do.
falcoperegrinus82 1 year ago 3
@falcoperegrinus82 Larry is clueless on this topic as he is with everything else. Let us pretend that another law limiting magazine capacity to 10 rounds passed. Let us also pretend that the millions of them that are in existance now, disappeared. With practice, anyone can do what the man in this youtube video entitled, "The fastest clip you'll probably ever see". NOW WHAT BITCHES? What will you ban next to combat that? There will be no magazine ban Larry. Deal with it.
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
@Maxwedge12000 retarded much?
falcoperegrinus82 1 year ago
Why can't more politicians follow the logic Lawrence follows.
Arkayem 1 year ago
deputy dog sounding republican had 2 reboot his brain 4 a second
WolfLantern1 1 year ago
I wonder how many of these gun loving nuts have young kids. I wonder if they have kids and lost one of them to a bullet fired from a gun obtained by a madman if their views towards gun control would change.
Extreme719Ballin 1 year ago
When I think of so many people on these News Interview programs - It is amazing how many just Will Not Answer an easy Yeh or Nay question. They have to, like Robots, spin their talking points. It pissed O'Donnell off a bit, which isn't hard to do. But Damn - just answer a Simple Question, Mr. Franks !! It has nothing to do with Rep & Dem.
resculptit 1 year ago
Answer the question Representative!
cmiller928 1 year ago
What a joke Franks is. Lol. Not only is he the typical, dumb, anti-intellectual, corporate shill Republican, he's also a typical cowardly Republican. He can't stand up for his fuckin' votes 'cause he's a yellow chicken. Ergo, the Republican Party is a joke.
kurd55 1 year ago
O'Donnell's logic is flawed. He was asking a loaded hypothetical question which doesn't address the root cause of the incident. You can't go back and change what happened. If it was Loughner's goal to get as many rounds off without reloading. He could have brought multiple guns already loaded. He could have used a submachine gun or assault rifle instead of a high capacity clip. O'Donnell was trying to get the congressman to admit the gun/ammo was the cause by repeated asking his loaded question.
tjlegow 1 year ago
JewsinUranus: Of course Lawrence asked a trap question. If Franks wanted to come out not looking like a fool he should have said "Yes I support citizens having extended clips, it's unfortunate people like Lafter who was allowed to make such a purchase." or "Yes I wish he didn't have an extended clip, but banning clips would not have made a difference." Those would have been acceptable answers, but he just refused to answer the question and bring God into equation or how dare you ask me that!
Midnightguy1171 1 year ago
@Midnightguy1171
That's what he should have done, but as a politician, he only knows how to avoid giving a strait answer.
mechredd 1 year ago
To quote a friend of mine.
"Too bad Trent didn't tell him about the worst school killing in U.S. history: 45 dead on May 18, 1927 in Bath, Michigan.
No 30 round magazine, no assault weapon, no gun at all. The crazies will always find a way."
Also, google Kennesaw Georgia.
mechredd 1 year ago
@mechredd Lol! Absurd. You have to go back 85 years to some insanely obscure event? Wow. You got good judgement. Well, I'll give you this: You sure know how to repeat your NRA, paranoid tea-bagger talking points. Do they hand out treats after you perform like a good drone?
kurd55 1 year ago
@kurd55
I don't know if he's in the NRA, but when it comes to the NRA vs. Brady, ALL of the statistical data gathered by non biased groups including the government, support the NRA. You can deny that all you want, but once you do some of your own research, you'll find that it's true. But you're a zombie who can't think for himself, after all, a curd is rotten.
Did you look up Kennesaw Georgia?
mechredd 1 year ago
@mechredd You've done your duty for the NRA, now sit up and beg for a treat like a good lil' drone.
kurd55 1 year ago
@kurd55
Who ever said that I was an NRA member?
I used to be a liberal like you, but then a few things happened that changed my outlook on life. I came to realize among other things, that there is evil in this world, and no law will stop it from doing what it wants, and that much of it stems from the law makers. You can outlaw weapons, but criminals will still get them, after all, criminals by definition don't obey the law. Loughner was determined to kill people, he would have found a way.
mechredd 1 year ago
@mechredd Lol! Sorry, your assertions don't make sense. That's why the grand dummy Franks, that folks like you voted for, could NOT answer the question. He looked like a pathetic, excoriated lil' sick puppy to everyone with a brain. These facts in combination with your unsolicited political background story, proves to me that you, like 99% of the Tea-Party, vote by fear and faith instead of facts.
kurd55 1 year ago
@kurd55
First off, I'm not a tea-party member, secondly, I didn't vote for this guy,and thirdly, fear and faith have nothing to do with how I vote. I vote based upon fact, and usually end up voting democrat.
When it comes to the 2nd amendment, the fact is that we have a right that the government has been trying to take away for years. You don't have to exercise that right, but you don't have the right to take it away from those who do lawfully exercise it.
mechredd 1 year ago
@mechredd Franks didn't answer the question for he feared the pious wrath of the gun-nuts. He couldn't answer the question because he knew the facts were stacked against him. He also knew that if he gave a truthful response, all of the gun-worshiping nuts would come out in zealous, wild-eyed fear and burn him at the stake for offending the great Gun-God and his flock of lemmings.
kurd55 1 year ago
@kurd55
How do my assertions not make sense? There is not a single documented case of a gun control law saving a life. There are however thousands of police reports of criminals using outlawed weapons to commit crime. You claim to make decisions based on facts, well the facts are there for everyone to see if they're willing to look, and they contradict the anti-gun argument. This is part of the reason that the BCEGV is losing members and influence, the facts don't support their claims.
mechredd 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mechredd Franks did NOT answer the question.
kurd55 1 year ago
@mechredd Lol! You're a birther? That proves you're delusional and your brain works on faith not facts. Don't bother me anymore, gun-worshiper. Can your glassy-eyed, delusional mind at least accomplish that easy, rudimentary task? Please & thank you. I have no interest in what you have to say. Arguing with a birther is about as constructive as trying to convince an insane asylum resident that a chair isn't a table. It's useless, 'cause their mind isn't rooted in reality.
kurd55 1 year ago
@mechredd What does this have to do with a discussion about gun violence? This is a bombing of a school using dynamite.
peter70chgo 1 year ago
@peter70chgo
It's just to show that gun or not, a killer will find a way to kill.
Another example of this was the failure of the assault weapons ban. It didn't affect violent crime rates. On the other hand the FBI reports that soon after it ended, there was a marked decrease in total violent crime overall, and gun related deaths. Reported home invasions and attempted robberies that were thwarted by gun owning citizens have increased, according to police and the FBI records.
mechredd 1 year ago
What O'Donnell doesn't realize is that criminals don't obey the law. Most gun crimes in this country are committed by known criminals who can't legally obtain a firearm, but they get them anyway. Magazine laws won't reduce crime or body counts, especially when reloading is so easy. The main reason why Loughner wasn't able to reload was because of the extended magazine. It is easier and faster to reload the small ones. Most people can fire 6 10rd magazines faster than they can 2 30's.
mechredd 1 year ago
"Don't be silly!" Yet another dumb-ass republican...
manteacher329 1 year ago 2
Lawrence O'Donnell is a true creditable voice of reason and for the left wing. I just find this Congressman Trent Franks a joke when he refuses to answer his question several times, and still believes that all types of guns should be allowed into the hands of the average citizen. What makes matters worse, he tries to change the subject talking about God or claims because we questioned about why such a man had a gun, it has to be political. This guy is clearly an assclown to the 10th degree.
Midnightguy1171 1 year ago
I think this is what Chris Rock meant, bullet control, not gun control. If clips can only hold 10 bullets, I would simply just take 3 guns with me.
ccheng21 1 year ago
Typical republican idiot.
armstrongpaul1964 1 year ago
AWESOME! Home run Lawrence. This is exactly why you cant talk to these people. Guns are their vice and they protect them with.....religion? wow,what a backward mass of idiots the right are. Looove the last comment at franks.."dont be silly",lol. seems only the left really care about human life,shame really
waters970 1 year ago
@waters970 what is it that "Shall not be infringed" you dont understand
fireking9934 1 year ago
o'donnell is a fucking idiot , do you think by banning certain guns or certain gun clips that somehow that will stop someone from getting their hands on them , if he believes that then he's fucking dumber than i thought he was
cocobear33 1 year ago
@cocobear33 Maybe it would? Why not play the safe side and possibly save lives that could be loss. Why do you need 31 bullets so bad??? If your not going to shoot people then why does it matter if you have to reload at 10 instead of 31?
PolytheisticDeities 1 year ago
@cocobear33
really the issue is simple this right wing dumb asses live in the world of the tv show "24"
were the rule is 1 shot 1 kill crap this man fired 31 shots using 1 clip probably in less that 10 seconds
if the clip held only 10 bullets he would have had to reload 3 times im ex military and even we do not use
a 31 bullet clip on a hand gun you twit neither do police officers this political prostitute is too busy kissing the nra`s ass to answer the question
rich24h 1 year ago
A BULLET IS A BULLET! a 9 mm can PENETRATE 3 - 4 skulls. so if, let's just say, 3 people stood in a row, he would still have been able to kill the same amount of people with a 10 round mag, as he would with a 31 round mag. PLUS HE'D HAVE ONE MORE TO HIMSELF..
so, WHY DOES IT FUCKIN' MATTER?!
a gun, is a gun. and a psycho, is a psycho.
A GUN IS MERELY A TOOL (that CAN KILL OF CORSE, but other things, THAT AREN'T ILLEGAL, CAN JUST AS WELL...!!) :P
"GUNS DON'T HURT PEOPLE. PEOPLE HURT PEOPLE!"
TimmyCabot 1 year ago
@TimmyCabot really the issue is simple this right wing dumb asses live in the world of the tv show "24"
were the rule is 1 shot 1 kill crap this man fired 31 shots using 1 clip probably in less that 10 seconds
if the clip held only 10 bullets he would have had to reload 3 times im ex military and even we do not use
a 31 bullet clip on a hand gun you twit neither do police officers this political prostitute is too busy kissing the nra`s ass to answer the question
restlys 1 year ago
10 bucks says he supports his fellow children of God going without any health care.
CosmicApe2 1 year ago
@CosmicApe2 I know right? They want stricter laws to make sure mentally ill people don't get their hands on guns, but don't support health care... how the hell are we suppose to pay for it then?
PolytheisticDeities 1 year ago
@PolytheisticDeities Make sure that the mentally ill get the care they need so they don't get their hands on it also...
PolytheisticDeities 1 year ago
I guess this congressman can answer a simple question, so i am goint to aswer the question for him
Yes I wish he had only had the oportunity to shoot 10 times not 31 bullets
see how easy congressman the problem is that you nor any of your family got kill or injure
saprissa40 1 year ago
Is this what we have for 2 years now, Republicans shoving their religion down peoples throats and refusing to admit the obvious? Oh that's new.
nullibist 1 year ago
yup, rep. franks believes people should be looked upon as children of god when it fits his purposes or if they're gay, then they're to be looked upon as something else. franks is a damned hypocrite!
franks has always had respect for human life only when it comes to his kind of "christian" human life. if they don't meet his ideas, then they can be treated as 2nd class citizens, i.e. DADT & marriage equality.
give me a break, the man's just another a lying "christian"republican hypocrite!
wntoply6 1 year ago
He simply does not want to recognize the fact that if Laughner had smaller clips, fewer people would have died and been injured. He simply can not acknowledge it, because to acknowledge it is to admit he's wrong and he'll have the NRA and his conservative voters coming after him.
A bunch of blinded hypocrites living with unrealistic, antiquated rules of law, not fit for modern society.
MintDentalFloss 1 year ago
As far as I know, not one of these mass murdering psychopaths has been stopped by another citizen with a gun. Not one. So what is the point of allowing even more guns to be made available in more places ?
homerth1555 1 year ago
Rep. Trent Franks, you're a fucking moron, & a dangerous one at that.
drunkenbluto 1 year ago 2
Evasive or what? "Children of god". Wtf was that about?
stephenwalls1 1 year ago 2
Destroyed!
BluJugganaut 1 year ago 2
Granted, it has been politicized. Granted, this guy's motive was not likely Sarah Palin, etc... He was clearly acutely mentally ill - not your garden variety "a little off" - but genuinely psychotic and from his symptoms, likely a paranoid schizophrenic. The issue is NOT his lack of respect for "children of god" - this issue is crazy ass people having access to weaponry and extended clips.
NurseMods 1 year ago