Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i feal sry to tell you something guys, first i use windows and linux so i work with both systems.. i play on windows and work on linux linux is so much fucking faster if i have to do sth like install some DNS server or apache.... i won't play any fucking game on linux therefore, windows is way better to play... and what i love most on windows = "BLUESCREEN"..... so i think why not try MAC OS X????

  • @Deltaxify Mac OS X running natively on my PC:

    watch?v=lQYduvxiBTk

  • Yes, windows is excellent for rendering games. I have it installed on my gaming comp. But for work I only use linux. I can't have my spice simulations going to hell everytime windows has a hiccup. Especially when I run a TCL script that takes all night to only have it crashed by the next day. So I'll let the gamers game on windows and the professionals use Linux (like most web servers and engineering firms). I've been using Debian (Lenny to Squeeze) for 2 years and it has never crashed.

  • @Nothing48919 What part of HTML5 do you not understand? It's hardly about gaming anymore.

  • @BattlePikeQueerLucy Probably the part were HTML5 is more than just a rendering benchmark. If a full suit of tests is ever done on HTML5 via Phoronix or some other legitimate benchmarking site then I'd completly agree with you.

  • @Nothing48919 Rendering? What are you smoking, dumbass?

    HTML5 and its features are designed to make it easy to include and handle multimedia and graphical content on the web without having to resort to proprietary plugins and APIs such as Adobe's Flash, etc.

    As you just saw in this video, Windows performs much better while handling HMTL5, but I understand: you're a mad Lunix fanboy who cried himself to sleep last night. LOL.

    And just for the record: Tomshardware uses this test regularly.

  • @Nothing48919 I used Debian, crashed more than a dozen times; just a bug ridden piece of garbage.

  • hmm..i wonder how my machine will perform on this test :D

    link me to it!

  • @313hummer Why would you wanna compare different machines? A more meaningful comparison would be testing different OS on your hardware.

    Link has been added in the description.

  • @lienucksfails2 well because i love to overclock my machine..and i would like a new benchmark

  • @313hummer Nice.

    By the way, a certain idiot ran this benchmark on the same hardware and pretended that Windows 7 scored 6 FPS.

    LMAO, the funny thing: the retard had no clue. Gotta feel sorry for these dumbasses.

  • @lienucksfails2 lmfao..i know..at first i was like HAHA! it finally won! then i realized he disabled hardware acceleration and i facepalmed so hard i broke my fucking nose LMFAO

  • @313hummer LOL, I know. The worst thing: he still hasn't figured it out nor those idiots that hang around his channel.

    Basically, all of them have been exposed as a bunch of morons.

  • @lienucksfails2 oh yea and btw linux mint 12 FUCKING SUCKS! ..it crashed almost as fast as 7 crashed for me..WTF ..recording doesnt work right..the codecs fucking broke..it was terrible

  • @313hummer All of the retarded 30 year old moron's videos are glitched too on Mint 11, even more proof that this guy is a maniac and a dumb troll. He still hasn't figured out that Mozilla has his GPU black-listed by default.

    The guy is beyond retarded.

  • 66TheRetard already confirmed the authenticity of this video by getting 24 FPS on Lunix on the same hardware while screencasting (actual score is 35 FPS).

    Self ownage.

    Thanks for proving that Windows 7 blows your garbage OS on your own PC.

    LOL.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more