I've tried FSX yesterday for the first time. I bought it on a store, and I must say that it's very much better than FS2004. Better graphics, better aircrafts, airports etc...
@cityoftheunknowns No you don't. You play with the Intel Atom. Also a flight sim is not for ''Oh wait, I have to get that addon!'' and so on but for realistic experience, not addons.
FS2004 is for real pilots 100% Pilots use it instead of FSX. But i like FSX i got both but i kinda use FS2004 for Passenger airliners and FSX for military :) They both run fine Fs2004 i see well over 60fps fsx around 50fps :)
fs9 with a mouse guage mod, new replaced ground/water/ and building textures. Runs with FSX's look & similar feel but with lower load on your computer. Ofcourese its not the same, but its the best you can do if you dont have a higher spec'ed pc
HP Pavilion Elite HPE-398d Desktop PC is this good enough for FSX? Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium 64-bit Intel® Core™ i7 processor 860 2.80 GHz 8 GB DDR3 1 TB SATA 3G Hard Disk Drive (7200 rpm) BlueRay Disc Combo Player NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 260 Special Edition; up to 5374 MB total available graphics memory, with 1.8 GB dedicated.....is this good how many FPS will i get and do u think it will run smoothly even if i make my settings high and will i have a nice graphics like yours??
i have the fsx and i have the everthing in the settings on max settings and it is 10 times better then the vidio comparison so fsx has a little bit les scenery but that is only because there is more advanced features (CPU specs: 2G nvidia graphics,4g RAM, 1TB harddrive and core i4 processer)
you can get rex and gex and achieve to 40 fps just look for fsx settings for your computer i have very similar computer specs and i get 10-40 fps with payware addons!!
The FSX is don't better than FS2004. I playing with the FSX - long time, but when i tried a detailed aircraft, like: PMDG 747 , and fly over NYC my computer has "cooked". I tried the FS2004 with PMDG 737-900, all settings MAX , fly over new-york, and tadaaaa! I have 80% more fps than the GREATLY FSX! The scenery, i think max. 1-2% better in the FSX. I used the FS2004 with REX, and Ground Env. Pro, and the visual is very beautiful, and i flying! Not, seeing a 1fps movie.... like FSX
The FSX is don't better than FS2004. I playing with the FSX - long time, but when i tried a detailed aircraft, like: PMDG 747 , and fly over NYC my computer has "cooked". I tried the FS2004 with PMDG 737-900, all settings MAX , fly over new-york, and tadaaaa! I have 80% more fps than the GREATLY FSX! The scenery, i think max. 1-2% better in the FSX. I used the FS2004 with REX, and Ground Env. Pro, and the visual is very beautiful, and i flying! Not, seeing a 1fps movie.... like FSX
Na leírom magyarul amit gondolok aztán angolul... Lehet a végtelenségig fikázni az FS2004-et, mert kijött a mega-szuper FSX. - Viszont szinte lószar különbséget sem lehet találni közöttük. Én az FS2004-et használom REX , és Ground Environment PRO-val, de szinte semmi eltérés nincs közöttük... De! Bocsánat! Egy nagy eltérés van! Hogy a 2004-ben lehet repülni, és nem képregényt nézni mint az FSX-ben.... ;)
If you ask me, Cessna, NYC, either in FS9 or FSX, remains as a frame hog. I once ended up 2-7fps while flying over it. If you want NYC to run at its best, then I'd suggest Aerosoft's Manahattan X scenery.
hello , please can you anwser my question , in fs2004 , if i am in the air the ground looks not nice .its like the ground is moving/flickering, and lines are moving , and object are filled with moving stripes and lines , i see it also a lot on vids in youtube , but some ..like in this vid i do not see it , my pc is pretty o.k with fs9( 2x2,51ghz) nvidia geforce9800gt512mb and 2048ram) but still the ground looks like i am drunk .its something like blurry .at a litle distance the ground is
If compared on a 5000 dollar computer, then FSX would take the win. It does run kinda shitty on normal computers, but if you have the right video cards and CPU's then FSX is outstanding. I have FSX. im on one of those crappier computers. i have played 2004 and its alright. but i have seen FSX being played in DirectX 11 with HD graphics cards. and it looks like im actually in a real plane. Looks amazing!!!!
@fungstupid It may but, FSX on most computers runs like a donkey going up a mountain with a fat Indian on it's back. After turning down the graphics for FSX, it looks even more crap that FS2004 but now it runs the same. My vote is for FS2004..bigger community better aircraft\scenery and better running.
Hey everyone, i have a question about landing. Could someone tell me how high my aircraft should be at certain distances from the runway during approach? Or could you provide a site that gives specific details about it? I recently learned ILS, but I dont look at the needle (or even know where it is), I just really need to know approach heights from x miles out. Thanks
How I learned was you need a 3 degree downward angle. You should also pick a spot around 50 feet from the end of the runway and aim for that point, when you get closer obviously pull up and glide into the landing, flare just a little right before you land.
when it comes out (i think next year if not by christmas) microsoft flight, which is the next in the flight simulator series. compared to fs2004 and fsx
i think that fsx is better, but fs2004 is better if you have addon scenery - it deals with the renderin and stuff better. also on fs2004 i have my traffic set to about 100%
I will know in about an hour, but I should be able to run FS2004 on my new system, right? Here are my specs:
Intel Core 2 Quad CPU @ 2.5 GHz
8 GB of RAM
Intel G33/G31 Video Card w/256 MB memory
Windows 7 Home - 64 bit
Directx 11
I tried FSX, and I can run at about medium settings. So I should be able to run FS2004 at full settings, right? Again, I will know in about an hour, as that's how long it will take for it to finish downloading.
Really good! I am running at medium-high settings. There are two problems though.
1. My video card SUCKS! If I had a better video card, my computer would be the "godly" computer. This is something I will probably not fix anytime soon.
2. Every so often, in flight simulator (only FS, no other games), the screen flashes. The flash is only for one or two milliseconds, but it flashes about every 5 - 30 seconds. This may be because of my wide screen monitor. I am running a resolution of 1600X900.
You wouldn't happen to know how to fix it though, right? It's annoying, especially because it only happens with FS (both FS2004 and FSX). And it's the kind of flash that would happen if some scenery takes a little too long to load.
great and unfortunate..lol...mine is not too bad either. I got a new system today and my specs are identical except i have 6 gigs of ram and no video card...when i do get one I'm gana get the best out their cuz i want fsx soooo badly
Does HP make your computer? If so, then you have the step down from mine. There are two HP computers, one is mine and one is a slightly worse version. Also, did yours come with a mouse, keyboard, and monitor. Mine came with an HP mouse, HP keyboard, and an HP 22" monitor. Pretty good deal for only $800. I think the other HP is about $600.
Ok, I'll try going down to DirectX 9. But it's kind of hard to tell which version I have. Performance tests and whatnot say I have DirectX 10, but the "dxdiag" menu says I have DirectX 11. And Windows 7 comes with DirectX 11 (supposedly). But I will install version 9 and see what happens.
if the cars and jetways and ground systems would be on fs2004 that is all i will be needing, but because microsoft didnt think of that before and decided fsx to be a fps sucker is annoying lol.
well i don't use fsx for free flight..FPS WIll drop my graphic card is nvdia 9500GT 1GB DDR10 nah jk DDR2..so i use fsx for online and fs2004 for free flight..with addons to make the same like fsx
Hey I don't want to see those kind of videos, FSX doesn't work on my computer... I just try to imagine that FS2004 is the best simulator available on earth and stay quiet...
It always seems like the software is about 4 years behind the hardware for games and flight sim because FS 2004 runs awesome pretty much on any machine now, and you would have to drop a couple grande on a machien to run the new stuff.
there should be an addon fsx to fix the way it loads scenery like 2004 dont no why there isnt i like fsx better looks sharper and better addons but i get double fps in fs9
If microsoft r gonna make a new FS they have to rebuild the entire game engine. To be honest the buildings in google Earth give me better graphcs than in FSX!!
wtf ? you think Jews put bombs in the buildings and crashed the planes?! why the hell do people like you blame the Jews for EVERYTHING! the truth is that it was muslims who flew the planes into the buildings and used some bombs but I don't look at this and think that all muslims are bad and you should not think that all Jews are bad either!
Hey, if you're going to bust on someone and call into question their intelligence, you lose credibility when your own message is fraught with misspellings and grammatical errors. Of course, this is YouTube and not exactly a forum for reasonable or respectable discussion.
is the 2004 default?
MrMonkeythegreat 1 month ago
gta 4 is better
davidebolz1 1 month ago
@davidebolz1 hhaa
xxdreamsxx100 1 month ago
I've tried FSX yesterday for the first time. I bought it on a store, and I must say that it's very much better than FS2004. Better graphics, better aircrafts, airports etc...
It's time to create some videos
I have one video from FS2004
94kricco 2 months ago
@94kricco my FSX is soo slow (ON 1 GB RAM)
aryoseno11 2 months ago
make a video with the WTC in them DONT CRASH IN EM!
nathanfishing3000 3 months ago in playlist More videos from Cessna154
I believe you should do a video on fs98
mannymarotta 3 months ago
i prefer to fsx
aryoseno11 4 months ago
@cityoftheunknowns Also your computer might be able to handle FSX.
Aviation2001 4 months ago
@cityoftheunknowns No you don't. You play with the Intel Atom. Also a flight sim is not for ''Oh wait, I have to get that addon!'' and so on but for realistic experience, not addons.
Aviation2001 4 months ago
People say FS2004 is better because they have a shitty computer.
Aviation2001 4 months ago
FS2004 is for real pilots 100% Pilots use it instead of FSX. But i like FSX i got both but i kinda use FS2004 for Passenger airliners and FSX for military :) They both run fine Fs2004 i see well over 60fps fsx around 50fps :)
BlackWidowZ93 5 months ago
FS2004 looks cartoonish lol
aljaca98 5 months ago
bad computer! :P
Akon12399 5 months ago
FSX is the better if you have the juice (hardware) to run it. FS2004 is still a great sim for less powerful machines.
Minalover100 6 months ago
You always sound tired...
ThiefOfMovies 6 months ago
@ThiefOfMovies I quote from the 747 vido: 'as I come to use this game daily...' The guy is FS addict, no wonder he sounds tired.
sanchises 6 months ago
FS 2004 when you look at the ground the lay out of the map is good and looks like NYC but in FSx The streets are going sideways LOL.
67tr876 7 months ago
fs9 with a mouse guage mod, new replaced ground/water/ and building textures. Runs with FSX's look & similar feel but with lower load on your computer. Ofcourese its not the same, but its the best you can do if you dont have a higher spec'ed pc
r4microds 8 months ago
I finally upgraded to FSX. Hard to go back to FS9. FSX is really better.
g7b7a7 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HP Pavilion Elite HPE-398d Desktop PC is this good enough for FSX? Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium 64-bit Intel® Core™ i7 processor 860 2.80 GHz 8 GB DDR3 1 TB SATA 3G Hard Disk Drive (7200 rpm) BlueRay Disc Combo Player NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 260 Special Edition; up to 5374 MB total available graphics memory, with 1.8 GB dedicated.....is this good how many FPS will i get and do u think it will run smoothly even if i make my settings high and will i have a nice graphics like yours??
jr4460 8 months ago
at fs9 i land my heli at the rooftop of the building but it falls(glitch)
4500intelx 8 months ago
@4500intelx there are some you can land on and at some buildings you fall... :) hope it helped
22cibe 8 months ago
I really hate fs9
Beech165 9 months ago
i have the fsx and i have the everthing in the settings on max settings and it is 10 times better then the vidio comparison so fsx has a little bit les scenery but that is only because there is more advanced features (CPU specs: 2G nvidia graphics,4g RAM, 1TB harddrive and core i4 processer)
MAF152SEB 9 months ago
seria espectacular un FS con graficos de 2011.¿verdad? esos estan buenos, pero ya no va mas...
ellicantropos 10 months ago
seria espectacular un foght simulator con graficos de 2011.¿verdad? esos estan buenos, pero ya no va mas...
ellicantropos 10 months ago
what computer do you have?
Alex2gamezZ 10 months ago
The only reason people say FS9 is better than FSX is because they have a weak ass shit computer.
volcom1722 10 months ago
hey can u tell how it run FSX
Intel Core i 3 .3 ghz. 4 gb of ram
Video:Ati mobility radeaon HD5430
IgnoskeLt777 11 months ago
@IgnoskeLt777
very well! put graphics on utlra high, scenery on high and the rest on medium high and you should run about 15-30 fps, different planes vary in fps.
reesy1251 11 months ago
@IgnoskeLt777 dont listen to him!
you can get rex and gex and achieve to 40 fps just look for fsx settings for your computer i have very similar computer specs and i get 10-40 fps with payware addons!!
MrDvirHamadbir 10 months ago
hey can you tell me how fsx would run on this specs?
-AMD Phenom II X6-1055T@2,8 ghz hexa-core
-8gb ram
-gtx460 se graphic
-win 7 hp
xX321Michi123Xx 1 year ago
What exctly is the reason for fsx to have lower fps in NYC than fs2004?
I mean there is'nt that much graphics difference :)
flygame94 1 year ago
@flygame94 the game engine and the textures are i think .png in fs2004 causing it to load faster and fsx idk
101MineCraft101 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The FSX is don't better than FS2004. I playing with the FSX - long time, but when i tried a detailed aircraft, like: PMDG 747 , and fly over NYC my computer has "cooked". I tried the FS2004 with PMDG 737-900, all settings MAX , fly over new-york, and tadaaaa! I have 80% more fps than the GREATLY FSX! The scenery, i think max. 1-2% better in the FSX. I used the FS2004 with REX, and Ground Env. Pro, and the visual is very beautiful, and i flying! Not, seeing a 1fps movie.... like FSX
Lifer092 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The FSX is don't better than FS2004. I playing with the FSX - long time, but when i tried a detailed aircraft, like: PMDG 747 , and fly over NYC my computer has "cooked". I tried the FS2004 with PMDG 737-900, all settings MAX , fly over new-york, and tadaaaa! I have 80% more fps than the GREATLY FSX! The scenery, i think max. 1-2% better in the FSX. I used the FS2004 with REX, and Ground Env. Pro, and the visual is very beautiful, and i flying! Not, seeing a 1fps movie.... like FSX
Lifer092 1 year ago
Comment removed
Lifer092 1 year ago
Na leírom magyarul amit gondolok aztán angolul... Lehet a végtelenségig fikázni az FS2004-et, mert kijött a mega-szuper FSX. - Viszont szinte lószar különbséget sem lehet találni közöttük. Én az FS2004-et használom REX , és Ground Environment PRO-val, de szinte semmi eltérés nincs közöttük... De! Bocsánat! Egy nagy eltérés van! Hogy a 2004-ben lehet repülni, és nem képregényt nézni mint az FSX-ben.... ;)
Lifer092 1 year ago
If you ask me, Cessna, NYC, either in FS9 or FSX, remains as a frame hog. I once ended up 2-7fps while flying over it. If you want NYC to run at its best, then I'd suggest Aerosoft's Manahattan X scenery.
ThreeSevenSpeedway 1 year ago
I'm not playing FSX :S
I'm playing FS2004 :)
Use Real Environment Xtreme to make FS2004 real :)
Romerjon17 1 year ago
wheres ground zero
soldier2975 1 year ago
@soldier2975 Good Question :)
Romerjon17 1 year ago
San Fierro(San Francisco) looks better in Gta San Andreas
Srchito1095 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Windows 7
HP Elite Desktop HPE-398d w/
Intel® Core™ i7 processor 860
• 2.80 GHz, DMI 2.5GT/s , 8GB DDR3,
1 TB SATA 3G Hard Disk Drive (7200 rpm) NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 260 Special Edition
up to 5374 MB total available graphics memory, with 1.8 GB dedicated
is this good for FSX?
can i max the settings?
jr4460 1 year ago
hello , please can you anwser my question , in fs2004 , if i am in the air the ground looks not nice .its like the ground is moving/flickering, and lines are moving , and object are filled with moving stripes and lines , i see it also a lot on vids in youtube , but some ..like in this vid i do not see it , my pc is pretty o.k with fs9( 2x2,51ghz) nvidia geforce9800gt512mb and 2048ram) but still the ground looks like i am drunk .its something like blurry .at a litle distance the ground is
euphoritch 1 year ago
GET SOME NUTS GET FSX XD
LFCshadyLFC123 1 year ago
Hey can someone tell me on how to make the distant scenery not flicker or and be fuzzy??
PilotBoy2020 1 year ago
If compared on a 5000 dollar computer, then FSX would take the win. It does run kinda shitty on normal computers, but if you have the right video cards and CPU's then FSX is outstanding. I have FSX. im on one of those crappier computers. i have played 2004 and its alright. but i have seen FSX being played in DirectX 11 with HD graphics cards. and it looks like im actually in a real plane. Looks amazing!!!!
16hypen3sp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FSX looks better than that crappy old fs2004
Flyman930 1 year ago
Fsx is way better than that crappy looking fs2004
Flyman930 1 year ago
@Flyman930 And FSX runs like shit.
Nassault630 1 year ago
2004 no better graphics but better gameplay
KikoSchling 1 year ago
FS2004 look like shit
fungstupid 1 year ago
@fungstupid It may but, FSX on most computers runs like a donkey going up a mountain with a fat Indian on it's back. After turning down the graphics for FSX, it looks even more crap that FS2004 but now it runs the same. My vote is for FS2004..bigger community better aircraft\scenery and better running.
shadddey5 1 year ago
xD for my much better is fs2004
pilot757ify 1 year ago
3D graphics on this game would make it incredibly immersive.
funnygames1 1 year ago
I also heard somewhere that fsx was concentrated on the planes and not on the ground textures.
MrVinney96 1 year ago
@MrVinney96 Other way round, FSX concentrates on "eye candy" and x-plane on the plane =)
LastShotprods 1 year ago
The reason FSX graphics load slower is because of the higher quality textures and meshes.
rbneville 1 year ago
my flight simulator is in german right now. Is there anyway I can change it to English? (flight simulator 2004)
Cantfindusername100 1 year ago
Hey everyone, i have a question about landing. Could someone tell me how high my aircraft should be at certain distances from the runway during approach? Or could you provide a site that gives specific details about it? I recently learned ILS, but I dont look at the needle (or even know where it is), I just really need to know approach heights from x miles out. Thanks
pierceceltics34 1 year ago
@pierceceltics34
How I learned was you need a 3 degree downward angle. You should also pick a spot around 50 feet from the end of the runway and aim for that point, when you get closer obviously pull up and glide into the landing, flare just a little right before you land.
Sting3733 1 year ago
when it comes out (i think next year if not by christmas) microsoft flight, which is the next in the flight simulator series. compared to fs2004 and fsx
ChRIs23696 1 year ago
fs9 uses less graphics yes?
TheFS10show 1 year ago
FSX has alittle too many grey buildings.
InvaderZim871 1 year ago
fsx is better
leonardoairify 1 year ago
Am i the only one who thinks FSX is a little too bright and gamey?
krshin21 1 year ago
@krshin21 nope,,
joboikickme 1 year ago
@krshin21 turn down the brightness then
bbvproductions 1 year ago
@bbvproductions
krshin21 1 year ago
FSX FTW ?
kennmmanproductions 1 year ago
The FSX version looks far better but I wouldn't vote for either of them, I'd go with the ones with the likes of Aerosoft.
ThreeSevenSpeedway 1 year ago
I have both I have to say the graphics, aircrafts, and airports look so much better at FSX!
shoykhetm 1 year ago
but i got fsx i never had a fs 2004 or any
nathanfishing3000 1 year ago
fs2004 is beter
nathanfishing3000 1 year ago
fsx looks better but 2004 is for the lower end computers
dxskatepwns 1 year ago
@dxskatepwns ya fs 2004 is for the general user but if you want to play fsx you must have bill gates come to your house and tell you what you need
HelloWorld492 1 year ago
@HelloWorld492 true, but i have a horrible Emachine everyday computer but i can run on medium-high
bbvproductions 1 year ago
@FSXFS2004 thank you sooooooo much :)
theenigmajeffhardy1 1 year ago
@theenigmajeffhardy1 no problemc :)
FSXFS2OO4 1 year ago
Wat should I get fs2004 or fsx
theenigmajeffhardy1 1 year ago
@theenigmajeffhardy1 FS2004. Its the best Flight Simulator game on the market. ;)
FSXFS2OO4 1 year ago
FS2004 runs graphics much better than FSX,but the roads and ground are way better than FS9. So, I'd say FSX!
TheGreatFlyer 1 year ago
The difference? I'd say about 60 fps :P
aceairgt3 1 year ago
no offense but fs2004 looks better
FlightMissions 1 year ago
fsx looks better
OoExTeCiiOo 1 year ago
Wheres the WTC?
RomerJon16 1 year ago
@RomerJon16
this game came after 2001 in the shops
TheUndertakerfan95 1 year ago
@RomerJon16 what do you mean wheres the wtc?
Actually that was harsh after 9/11 they orded that the towers be removed from fs.
WarmUwithMyFeet 1 year ago
how can i download this game in a fast way please help me>> thanks
slim0000fadi 1 year ago
@slim0000fadi Go to simmarket or any other shop online. You can pay and download if you have a high speed connetcion ;)
Gerardius 1 year ago
His computer must be powered by a Magneto Plasma turbine engine or something
INFORISISY 1 year ago
fsx
joninordhus 1 year ago
FSX with maximum configurations is something indescribable
jachoposs 1 year ago
I Like Fs2004 Bettr Coze It's an AWesome game and Fsx Yust Kills The Fraps YOu need an Custom Gaming PC To Play Fsx and For Fs2005 U don't =D xD
nikthepilot 1 year ago
the graphics engine in FSX is crap but i still prefer FSX over FS 2004 for the looks and the wiews
THproductions1000 1 year ago
fsx
michaelace11 1 year ago
u have to have a bloody nuclear powerstaion to play fsx
unusedteabag 1 year ago
lol yeah
leekimlanuza 1 year ago
i use FSX it s all maxed out no lagg but i still play FS 2004 but yeah the Graphics engine are slower then FS 2004 nice vid
FSXHD92 1 year ago
i think that fsx is better, but fs2004 is better if you have addon scenery - it deals with the renderin and stuff better. also on fs2004 i have my traffic set to about 100%
AirbusA380rox 2 years ago
fsx graphics are great, but fps sucks tailpipe
TurbofanDude 2 years ago
fsx have better graphics but fs2004 is more realistic
guidodeukuzeta1234 2 years ago
yeah, with real environment pro and a bit of bloom on fs2004 it is awesome, it feels that ur actually flying in fs2004 cus of good fps
Lvieru96 2 years ago
what are your computer specs?
ChRIs23696 2 years ago
fs2004 has got a better performance.
it doesnt lag if you play with add-ons are sth like that.
you need a really good computer to play with high grafics
Kai8593 2 years ago
FSX Has better graphics,but one questions:is the flight dynamic of FS2004 better than FSX flight dynamic???
gaspeli 2 years ago
When does FS10 come out!!!
dingdongditch1000 2 years ago
its been out 4 a VERY long time. over a year ago. where have you been?
Mexicano27mexicaN 2 years ago
FS10 came out in 2006 stupide
FsimulatorX 2 years ago
its out since over 3 <ears xD
michaely94 2 years ago
@dingdongditch1000 you retard it came out in 2006
freestylefilmsinc 2 years ago
fsx is fs10 lol.
fs11 wont come out
Lvieru96 2 years ago
probably not...
kbtrumpeteer 2 years ago
Aerosoft is working on it now.
TubeYourProductions 2 years ago
I will know in about an hour, but I should be able to run FS2004 on my new system, right? Here are my specs:
Intel Core 2 Quad CPU @ 2.5 GHz
8 GB of RAM
Intel G33/G31 Video Card w/256 MB memory
Windows 7 Home - 64 bit
Directx 11
I tried FSX, and I can run at about medium settings. So I should be able to run FS2004 at full settings, right? Again, I will know in about an hour, as that's how long it will take for it to finish downloading.
airbusandmustang 2 years ago
how is fs2004 on your system?
91BROWNIE91 2 years ago
Really good! I am running at medium-high settings. There are two problems though.
1. My video card SUCKS! If I had a better video card, my computer would be the "godly" computer. This is something I will probably not fix anytime soon.
2. Every so often, in flight simulator (only FS, no other games), the screen flashes. The flash is only for one or two milliseconds, but it flashes about every 5 - 30 seconds. This may be because of my wide screen monitor. I am running a resolution of 1600X900.
airbusandmustang 2 years ago
You wouldn't happen to know how to fix it though, right? It's annoying, especially because it only happens with FS (both FS2004 and FSX). And it's the kind of flash that would happen if some scenery takes a little too long to load.
airbusandmustang 2 years ago
great and unfortunate..lol...mine is not too bad either. I got a new system today and my specs are identical except i have 6 gigs of ram and no video card...when i do get one I'm gana get the best out their cuz i want fsx soooo badly
91BROWNIE91 2 years ago
Does HP make your computer? If so, then you have the step down from mine. There are two HP computers, one is mine and one is a slightly worse version. Also, did yours come with a mouse, keyboard, and monitor. Mine came with an HP mouse, HP keyboard, and an HP 22" monitor. Pretty good deal for only $800. I think the other HP is about $600.
airbusandmustang 2 years ago
nah. mine is not hp. the manufacturer is ASUS. and im using my old monitor. it only came with mouse and keyboard. 450bucks
91BROWNIE91 2 years ago
@airbusandmustang
maybe its direct x 10
people have been comlpaining whgo run with direct x 10
Lvieru96 2 years ago
Ok, I'll try going down to DirectX 9. But it's kind of hard to tell which version I have. Performance tests and whatnot say I have DirectX 10, but the "dxdiag" menu says I have DirectX 11. And Windows 7 comes with DirectX 11 (supposedly). But I will install version 9 and see what happens.
airbusandmustang 2 years ago
if the cars and jetways and ground systems would be on fs2004 that is all i will be needing, but because microsoft didnt think of that before and decided fsx to be a fps sucker is annoying lol.
Lvieru96 2 years ago
well i don't use fsx for free flight..FPS WIll drop my graphic card is nvdia 9500GT 1GB DDR10 nah jk DDR2..so i use fsx for online and fs2004 for free flight..with addons to make the same like fsx
syafiqpilot 2 years ago
FSX rules the only reason i wood want fs04 is to use meigs field =(
KartKing4ever 2 years ago
which is better i wonder
thenicksterful 2 years ago
whats better fs2004 or fsx? i have 2004 now but is fsx worth getting?
Lvieru96 2 years ago
Yes. There is a little more detail in fsx (not to noticable though), but the main reason is online play. Its pretty awesome.
fsgenious 2 years ago
Yeah, but gamespy ruins the online play - i can deal with it though lol
Captainbritishair 2 years ago
I totally agree... it is TERRIBLE! :)
fsgenious 2 years ago
żal
metin219 2 years ago
where can i download FSX?
numberonetheden 2 years ago
You actually have to buy it! If you want to try, you can download the trial version for free. But to play this easily, you must have a joystick.
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
Hey I don't want to see those kind of videos, FSX doesn't work on my computer... I just try to imagine that FS2004 is the best simulator available on earth and stay quiet...
MrVielanda 2 years ago
Hey, nice video and can you compare the water between 2004 and X?
rbjplay13 2 years ago
It always seems like the software is about 4 years behind the hardware for games and flight sim because FS 2004 runs awesome pretty much on any machine now, and you would have to drop a couple grande on a machien to run the new stuff.
homecockpitguy 2 years ago
did you have all your graphix on ulta high
KYLEAKAFLYBOIK 2 years ago
Can you add the twin towers?
EP1997 2 years ago
lol
snipski0894 2 years ago
i know theres a scenery patch for 2004, as for x, i'm not sure
CurlyBlakey 2 years ago
how did you get this water effects in FS2004, is it an Add-On? 0:00 - 0:20
LuftfahrtFan 2 years ago
the best is fsx
luisfsx 2 years ago
dude. this vid is good. but next time. make it side my side! and talk a little differently because you sound creepy lol
good vid
gumberly 2 years ago
Nah! I think Cessna154 was relaxed with his girl.
FS2004ACoF 2 years ago
hahha lol exactly!
gumberly 2 years ago
there should be an addon fsx to fix the way it loads scenery like 2004 dont no why there isnt i like fsx better looks sharper and better addons but i get double fps in fs9
jkachur777 2 years ago
it does not have better add ons for fs2004...only good add on FSX has is REX, loser
FSHighDefinition 2 years ago
in 04 wat camera view is this
zzzchaosxxx 2 years ago
Spot view.
pilot7893 2 years ago
glad i kept 2004 :D
spaceman022 2 years ago
i've seen some incredible video of fs2004 that absolutely blow me away. flyinfinn74, aymanus, and karakab post incredible fs2004 videos.
longlivethe80s 2 years ago
what about greatbrita
FSHighDefinition 2 years ago
FS9 BITCH!!!!
yke90 2 years ago
Can you try to crash a plane for a video?
ned987 2 years ago
is there an add on where u can put the twin towers back in?
checkerblob 2 years ago
Search in FlightSim,com (Membership Required), or Simviation or AVSIM. That's where I got those beautiful ladies back.
FS2004ACoF 2 years ago
If microsoft r gonna make a new FS they have to rebuild the entire game engine. To be honest the buildings in google Earth give me better graphcs than in FSX!!
KMbatia1 2 years ago
u know it not easy to built a simulator of the whole world....i think microsft did a gud job!
Eirwan95 2 years ago
of course google earth will have better graphics then fsx cause google earth is in actual picture of it unlike fsx where they have to build it
cancunpilot1 2 years ago
fs2004 is better it runs much smoother.
MyVideoHubOnDell 2 years ago
HEC YEAAAAAAAAAA FS2004 TIL THE END.....wellll unless a new fs comes out with detailed buildings and stuff that do NOT decrease FPS!
futurepilot2394 2 years ago
and it has more (way more) addons
kazim786 2 years ago
yh i know i have fsx it has terible ffp yet i have the recommended stuff 4 it i hopefully am getting fs2004
arun1pilot 2 years ago
wtf ? you think Jews put bombs in the buildings and crashed the planes?! why the hell do people like you blame the Jews for EVERYTHING! the truth is that it was muslims who flew the planes into the buildings and used some bombs but I don't look at this and think that all muslims are bad and you should not think that all Jews are bad either!
jetstorm747 2 years ago
I did, and what does being a Jew have to do with that?
jetstorm747 2 years ago
what makes you think pianorenamon is Jewish? (to KamZ94)
jetstorm747 2 years ago
whats really stupid about the new fs is that the plane doesnt interact with a building. it just disappears right in. like the fake plane on 9/11
chibangin007 2 years ago
good can you make a comparaison between some cities in South America anybody flies there please !!!
cuboperu 2 years ago
Hey, if you're going to bust on someone and call into question their intelligence, you lose credibility when your own message is fraught with misspellings and grammatical errors. Of course, this is YouTube and not exactly a forum for reasonable or respectable discussion.
azimuth361 2 years ago
yo son fsx vs fs2004 hell no fsx win because fsx has more feather and better shit get your shit strate dick face
meshachjackson18 2 years ago
try a comparison of london or hong kong.
:)
DeanCoretso 2 years ago
FSX Wins if u have FS9 go to wal-mart and get fsx ok u got it
SamSpam43 2 years ago
what pc are u running on??
Ryan44402 2 years ago
a pretty freaking sweet one duh
jvandervalk 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No twin towers OMG
i want to crash it T_T
like Flight 911
pianorenamon 2 years ago
no point of doing that, you will fly through, or you will restart at the airport
russiapwnage 2 years ago
wow you are retarded. it happened on 9/11 it wasn't flight 911 dumbass.
jmclaren77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
. copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds
4. press refresh twice
3. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY
henrico2008 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds
4. press refresh twice
3. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND IT WILL BE FREAKY
paperboy62528 2 years ago