Added: 3 years ago
From: Cessna154
Views: 58,537
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (313)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is the 2004 default?

  • gta 4 is better

  • @davidebolz1 hhaa

  • I've tried FSX yesterday for the first time. I bought it on a store, and I must say that it's very much better than FS2004. Better graphics, better aircrafts, airports etc...

    It's time to create some videos

    I have one video from FS2004

  • @94kricco my FSX is soo slow (ON 1 GB RAM)

  • make a video with the WTC in them DONT CRASH IN EM!

  • I believe you should do a video on fs98

  • i prefer to fsx

  • @cityoftheunknowns Also your computer might be able to handle FSX.

  • @cityoftheunknowns No you don't. You play with the Intel Atom. Also a flight sim is not for ''Oh wait, I have to get that addon!'' and so on but for realistic experience, not addons.

  • People say FS2004 is better because they have a shitty computer.

  • FS2004 is for real pilots 100% Pilots use it instead of FSX. But i like FSX i got both but i kinda use FS2004 for Passenger airliners and FSX for military :) They both run fine Fs2004 i see well over 60fps fsx around 50fps :)

  • FS2004 looks cartoonish lol

  • bad computer! :P

  • FSX is the better if you have the juice (hardware) to run it. FS2004 is still a great sim for less powerful machines.

  • You always sound tired...

  • @ThiefOfMovies I quote from the 747 vido: 'as I come to use this game daily...' The guy is FS addict, no wonder he sounds tired.

  • FS 2004 when you look at the ground the lay out of the map is good and looks like NYC but in FSx The streets are going sideways LOL.

  • fs9 with a mouse guage mod, new replaced ground/water/ and building textures. Runs with FSX's look & similar feel but with lower load on your computer. Ofcourese its not the same, but its the best you can do if you dont have a higher spec'ed pc

  • I finally upgraded to FSX. Hard to go back to FS9. FSX is really better.

  • at fs9 i land my heli at the rooftop of the building but it falls(glitch)

  • @4500intelx there are some you can land on and at some buildings you fall... :) hope it helped

  • I really hate fs9

  • i have the fsx and i have the everthing in the settings on max settings and it is 10 times better then the vidio comparison so fsx has a little bit les scenery but that is only because there is more advanced features (CPU specs: 2G nvidia graphics,4g RAM, 1TB harddrive and core i4 processer)

  • seria espectacular un FS con graficos de 2011.¿verdad? esos estan buenos, pero ya no va mas...

  • seria espectacular un foght simulator con graficos de 2011.¿verdad? esos estan buenos, pero ya no va mas...

  • what computer do you have?

  • The only reason people say FS9 is better than FSX is because they have a weak ass shit computer.

  • hey can u tell how it run FSX

    Intel Core i 3 .3 ghz. 4 gb of ram

    Video:Ati mobility radeaon HD5430

  • @IgnoskeLt777

    very well! put graphics on utlra high, scenery on high and the rest on medium high and you should run about 15-30 fps, different planes vary in fps.

  • @IgnoskeLt777 dont listen to him!

    you can get rex and gex and achieve to 40 fps just look for fsx settings for your computer i have very similar computer specs and i get 10-40 fps with payware addons!!

  • hey can you tell me how fsx would run on this specs?

    -AMD Phenom II X6-1055T@2,8 ghz hexa-core

    -8gb ram

    -gtx460 se graphic

    -win 7 hp

  • What exctly is the reason for fsx to have lower fps in NYC than fs2004?

    I mean there is'nt that much graphics difference :)

  • @flygame94 the game engine and the textures are i think .png in fs2004 causing it to load faster and fsx idk

  • Comment removed

  • Na leírom magyarul amit gondolok aztán angolul... Lehet a végtelenségig fikázni az FS2004-et, mert kijött a mega-szuper FSX. - Viszont szinte lószar különbséget sem lehet találni közöttük. Én az FS2004-et használom REX , és Ground Environment PRO-val, de szinte semmi eltérés nincs közöttük... De! Bocsánat! Egy nagy eltérés van! Hogy a 2004-ben lehet repülni, és nem képregényt nézni mint az FSX-ben.... ;)

  • If you ask me, Cessna, NYC, either in FS9 or FSX, remains as a frame hog. I once ended up 2-7fps while flying over it. If you want NYC to run at its best, then I'd suggest Aerosoft's Manahattan X scenery.

  • I'm not playing FSX :S

    I'm playing FS2004 :)

    Use Real Environment Xtreme to make FS2004 real :)

  • wheres ground zero

  • @soldier2975 Good Question :)

  • San Fierro(San Francisco) looks better in Gta San Andreas

  • hello , please can you anwser my question , in fs2004 , if i am in the air the ground looks not nice .its like the ground is moving/flickering, and lines are moving , and object are filled with moving stripes and lines , i see it also a lot on vids in youtube , but some ..like in this vid i do not see it , my pc is pretty o.k with fs9( 2x2,51ghz) nvidia geforce9800gt512mb and 2048ram) but still the ground looks like i am drunk .its something like blurry .at a litle distance the ground is

  • GET SOME NUTS GET FSX XD

  • Hey can someone tell me on how to make the distant scenery not flicker or and be fuzzy??

  • If compared on a 5000 dollar computer, then FSX would take the win. It does run kinda shitty on normal computers, but if you have the right video cards and CPU's then FSX is outstanding. I have FSX. im on one of those crappier computers. i have played 2004 and its alright. but i have seen FSX being played in DirectX 11 with HD graphics cards. and it looks like im actually in a real plane. Looks amazing!!!!

  • Fsx is way better than that crappy looking fs2004

  • @Flyman930 And FSX runs like shit.

  • 2004 no better graphics but better gameplay

  • FS2004 look like shit

  • @fungstupid It may but, FSX on most computers runs like a donkey going up a mountain with a fat Indian on it's back. After turning down the graphics for FSX, it looks even more crap that FS2004 but now it runs the same. My vote is for FS2004..bigger community better aircraft\scenery and better running.

  • xD for my much better is fs2004

  • 3D graphics on this game would make it incredibly immersive.

  • I also heard somewhere that fsx was concentrated on the planes and not on the ground textures.

  • @MrVinney96 Other way round, FSX concentrates on "eye candy" and x-plane on the plane =)

  • The reason FSX graphics load slower is because of the higher quality textures and meshes.

  • my flight simulator is in german right now. Is there anyway I can change it to English? (flight simulator 2004)

  • Hey everyone, i have a question about landing. Could someone tell me how high my aircraft should be at certain distances from the runway during approach? Or could you provide a site that gives specific details about it? I recently learned ILS, but I dont look at the needle (or even know where it is), I just really need to know approach heights from x miles out. Thanks

  • @pierceceltics34

    How I learned was you need a 3 degree downward angle. You should also pick a spot around 50 feet from the end of the runway and aim for that point, when you get closer obviously pull up and glide into the landing, flare just a little right before you land.

  • when it comes out (i think next year if not by christmas) microsoft flight, which is the next in the flight simulator series. compared to fs2004 and fsx

  • fs9 uses less graphics yes?

  • FSX has alittle too many grey buildings.

  • fsx is better

  • Am i the only one who thinks FSX is a little too bright and gamey?

  • @krshin21 nope,,

  • @krshin21 turn down the brightness then

  • FSX FTW ?

  • The FSX version looks far better but I wouldn't vote for either of them, I'd go with the ones with the likes of Aerosoft.

  • I have both I have to say the graphics, aircrafts, and airports look so much better at FSX!

  • but i got fsx i never had a fs 2004 or any

  • fs2004 is beter

  • fsx looks better but 2004 is for the lower end computers

  • @dxskatepwns ya fs 2004 is for the general user but if you want to play fsx you must have bill gates come to your house and tell you what you need

  • @HelloWorld492 true, but i have a horrible Emachine everyday computer but i can run on medium-high

  • @FSXFS2004 thank you sooooooo much :)

  • @theenigmajeffhardy1 no problemc :)

  • Wat should I get fs2004 or fsx

  • @theenigmajeffhardy1 FS2004. Its the best Flight Simulator game on the market. ;)

  • FS2004 runs graphics much better than FSX,but the roads and ground are way better than FS9. So, I'd say FSX!

  • The difference? I'd say about 60 fps :P

  • no offense but fs2004 looks better

  • fsx looks better

  • Wheres the WTC?

  • @RomerJon16

    this game came after 2001 in the shops

  • @RomerJon16 what do you mean wheres the wtc?

    Actually that was harsh after 9/11 they orded that the towers be removed from fs.

  • how can i download this game in a fast way please help me>> thanks

  • @slim0000fadi Go to simmarket or any other shop online. You can pay and download if you have a high speed connetcion ;)

  • His computer must be powered by a Magneto Plasma turbine engine or something

  • fsx

  • FSX with maximum configurations is something indescribable

  • I Like Fs2004 Bettr Coze It's an AWesome game and Fsx Yust Kills The Fraps YOu need an Custom Gaming PC To Play Fsx and For Fs2005 U don't =D xD

  • the graphics engine in FSX is crap but i still prefer FSX over FS 2004 for the looks and the wiews

  • fsx

  • u have to have a bloody nuclear powerstaion to play fsx

  • lol yeah

  • i use FSX it s all maxed out no lagg but i still play FS 2004 but yeah the Graphics engine are slower then FS 2004 nice vid

  • i think that fsx is better, but fs2004 is better if you have addon scenery - it deals with the renderin and stuff better. also on fs2004 i have my traffic set to about 100%

  • fsx graphics are great, but fps sucks tailpipe

  • fsx have better graphics but fs2004 is more realistic

  • yeah, with real environment pro and a bit of bloom on fs2004 it is awesome, it feels that ur actually flying in fs2004 cus of good fps

  • what are your computer specs?

  • fs2004 has got a better performance.

    it doesnt lag if you play with add-ons are sth like that.

    you need a really good computer to play with high grafics

  • FSX Has better graphics,but one questions:is the flight dynamic of FS2004 better than FSX flight dynamic???

  • When does FS10 come out!!!

  • its been out 4 a VERY long time. over a year ago. where have you been?

  • FS10 came out in 2006 stupide

  • its out since over 3 <ears xD

  • @dingdongditch1000 you retard it came out in 2006

  • fsx is fs10 lol.

    fs11 wont come out

  • probably not...

  • Aerosoft is working on it now.

  • I will know in about an hour, but I should be able to run FS2004 on my new system, right? Here are my specs:

    Intel Core 2 Quad CPU @ 2.5 GHz

    8 GB of RAM

    Intel G33/G31 Video Card w/256 MB memory

    Windows 7 Home - 64 bit

    Directx 11

    I tried FSX, and I can run at about medium settings. So I should be able to run FS2004 at full settings, right? Again, I will know in about an hour, as that's how long it will take for it to finish downloading.

  • how is fs2004 on your system?

  • Really good! I am running at medium-high settings. There are two problems though.

    1. My video card SUCKS! If I had a better video card, my computer would be the "godly" computer. This is something I will probably not fix anytime soon.

    2. Every so often, in flight simulator (only FS, no other games), the screen flashes. The flash is only for one or two milliseconds, but it flashes about every 5 - 30 seconds. This may be because of my wide screen monitor. I am running a resolution of 1600X900.

  • You wouldn't happen to know how to fix it though, right? It's annoying, especially because it only happens with FS (both FS2004 and FSX). And it's the kind of flash that would happen if some scenery takes a little too long to load.

  • great and unfortunate..lol...mine is not too bad either. I got a new system today and my specs are identical except i have 6 gigs of ram and no video card...when i do get one I'm gana get the best out their cuz i want fsx soooo badly

  • Does HP make your computer? If so, then you have the step down from mine. There are two HP computers, one is mine and one is a slightly worse version. Also, did yours come with a mouse, keyboard, and monitor. Mine came with an HP mouse, HP keyboard, and an HP 22" monitor. Pretty good deal for only $800. I think the other HP is about $600.

  • nah. mine is not hp. the manufacturer is ASUS. and im using my old monitor. it only came with mouse and keyboard. 450bucks

  • @airbusandmustang

    maybe its direct x 10

    people have been comlpaining whgo run with direct x 10

  • Ok, I'll try going down to DirectX 9. But it's kind of hard to tell which version I have. Performance tests and whatnot say I have DirectX 10, but the "dxdiag" menu says I have DirectX 11. And Windows 7 comes with DirectX 11 (supposedly). But I will install version 9 and see what happens.

  • if the cars and jetways and ground systems would be on fs2004 that is all i will be needing, but because microsoft didnt think of that before and decided fsx to be a fps sucker is annoying lol.

  • well i don't use fsx for free flight..FPS WIll drop my graphic card is nvdia 9500GT 1GB DDR10 nah jk DDR2..so i use fsx for online and fs2004 for free flight..with addons to make the same like fsx

  • FSX rules the only reason i wood want fs04 is to use meigs field =(

  • which is better i wonder

  • whats better fs2004 or fsx? i have 2004 now but is fsx worth getting?

  • Yes. There is a little more detail in fsx (not to noticable though), but the main reason is online play. Its pretty awesome.

  • Yeah, but gamespy ruins the online play - i can deal with it though lol

  • I totally agree... it is TERRIBLE! :)

  • żal

  • where can i download FSX?

  • You actually have to buy it! If you want to try, you can download the trial version for free. But to play this easily, you must have a joystick.

  • Hey I don't want to see those kind of videos, FSX doesn't work on my computer... I just try to imagine that FS2004 is the best simulator available on earth and stay quiet...

  • Hey, nice video and can you compare the water between 2004 and X?

  • It always seems like the software is about 4 years behind the hardware for games and flight sim because FS 2004 runs awesome pretty much on any machine now, and you would have to drop a couple grande on a machien to run the new stuff.

  • did you have all your graphix on ulta high

  • Can you add the twin towers?

  • lol

  • i know theres a scenery patch for 2004, as for x, i'm not sure

  • how did you get this water effects in FS2004, is it an Add-On? 0:00 - 0:20

  • the best is fsx

  • dude. this vid is good. but next time. make it side my side! and talk a little differently because you sound creepy lol

    good vid

  • Nah! I think Cessna154 was relaxed with his girl.

  • hahha lol exactly!

  • there should be an addon fsx to fix the way it loads scenery like 2004 dont no why there isnt i like fsx better looks sharper and better addons but i get double fps in fs9

  • it does not have better add ons for fs2004...only good add on FSX has is REX, loser

  • in 04 wat camera view is this

  • Spot view.

  • glad i kept 2004 :D

  • i've seen some incredible video of fs2004 that absolutely blow me away. flyinfinn74, aymanus, and karakab post incredible fs2004 videos.

  • what about greatbrita

  • FS9 BITCH!!!!

  • Can you try to crash a plane for a video?

  • is there an add on where u can put the twin towers back in?

  • Search in FlightSim,com (Membership Required), or Simviation or AVSIM. That's where I got those beautiful ladies back.

  • If microsoft r gonna make a new FS they have to rebuild the entire game engine. To be honest the buildings in google Earth give me better graphcs than in FSX!!

  • u know it not easy to built a simulator of the whole world....i think microsft did a gud job!

  • of course google earth will have better graphics then fsx cause google earth is in actual picture of it unlike fsx where they have to build it

  • fs2004 is better it runs much smoother.

  • HEC YEAAAAAAAAAA FS2004 TIL THE END.....wellll unless a new fs comes out with detailed buildings and stuff that do NOT decrease FPS!

  • and it has more (way more) addons

  • yh i know i have fsx it has terible ffp yet i have the recommended stuff 4 it i hopefully am getting fs2004

  • wtf ? you think Jews put bombs in the buildings and crashed the planes?! why the hell do people like you blame the Jews for EVERYTHING! the truth is that it was muslims who flew the planes into the buildings and used some bombs but I don't look at this and think that all muslims are bad and you should not think that all Jews are bad either!

  • I did, and what does being a Jew have to do with that?

  • what makes you think pianorenamon is Jewish? (to KamZ94)

  • whats really stupid about the new fs is that the plane doesnt interact with a building. it just disappears right in. like the fake plane on 9/11

  • good can you make a comparaison between some cities in South America anybody flies there please !!!

  • Hey, if you're going to bust on someone and call into question their intelligence, you lose credibility when your own message is fraught with misspellings and grammatical errors. Of course, this is YouTube and not exactly a forum for reasonable or respectable discussion.

  • yo son fsx vs fs2004 hell no fsx win because fsx has more feather and better shit get your shit strate dick face

  • try a comparison of london or hong kong.

    :)

  • FSX Wins if u have FS9 go to wal-mart and get fsx ok u got it

  • what pc are u running on??

  • a pretty freaking sweet one duh

  • no point of doing that, you will fly through, or you will restart at the airport

  • wow you are retarded. it happened on 9/11 it wasn't flight 911 dumbass.