The dishonorable steven is more like it.A radical that stuck down laws that protected rights to citizens while finding things that stole rights from the states to create things not in the constitution.For almost 35 years,injustice toward the founders and the american people have been violated by this sorry excuse for a justice.
@namtesyalp Well-respected figures with backgrounds in law on both sides of the spectrum consider his opinions, at the very least even when in disagreement, to be rooted in sound & consistent legal rationale. That's just about all you can ask from a justice. The complex decisions that the court renders cannot be properly understood by tuning in to Fox News or Rush Limbaugh. Using a sound bite from a pundit or "analysis" from bloggers with no legal background is an insult to the institution.
The dishonorable steven is more like it.A radical that stuck down laws that protected rights to citizens while finding things that stole rights from the states to create things not in the constitution.For almost 35 years,injustice toward the founders and the american people have been violated by this sorry excuse for a justice.
namtesyalp 1 year ago
@namtesyalp But he's probably so much better than his soon-to-be-named Replacement....
bmf1706 1 year ago
@namtesyalp Well-respected figures with backgrounds in law on both sides of the spectrum consider his opinions, at the very least even when in disagreement, to be rooted in sound & consistent legal rationale. That's just about all you can ask from a justice. The complex decisions that the court renders cannot be properly understood by tuning in to Fox News or Rush Limbaugh. Using a sound bite from a pundit or "analysis" from bloggers with no legal background is an insult to the institution.
JC7383 1 year ago 4
No sound bite,its my words.He would have sided with the conservatives on a major decision at least once if he had a mind of his own
namtesyalp 1 year ago
boooooring, lol.
lasagnajohn 2 years ago
@lasagnajohn idiot.
MrWsad 1 year ago