This proffessor did not come here looking for a fight. He was really sincere and mostly under control until the very end when he was provoked. I cant understand the frustration of the hosts because they absolutely and whole-heartedly disagree - but this is now the second video in a row Ive seen of this Hannity and Colmes show (Im Australian so I don't know it) where Hannity just does a Bill O'Reilly and starts talking over them and being obtuse. Makes for good TV but its pretty crappy.
@gnossticc - yep something definitely went down in building 7, probably the control tower for the entire thing, but thats pure speculation. It was definitely 'destroyed' for purposes of getting rid of evidence. Who knows how or why, but thats not as important as who and when. It seems nobody even cares about 'what' unfortunately at this time.
@brainphreak I have thought a similar thing, [ 7 used as control tower], just recently I saw a video that implied that. A lot of people put Dr Judy Wood and John Hutchison down,but in some of his experiments he points a wand like thing at what he wants to get a reaction out of and then it reacts to the field effect.Who`s to say the govmnt has`nt perfected this,there could have been something pointing at the towers from 7,however that still leaves questions about 7 itself.
fox news is a big joke ...the anchormen are so corrupted.... !!!! most of them hate muslims because of thier ignorance and because they were brainwashed and that blinds them enough not to even try to seek the information/truth ..cheap lost souls
If using critical thinking and applying laws of physics to come to a reasonable and logical conclusion makes you a *nut* or a *nutcase*, then I am so goddamn insane it's not even funny. The world is flat, there's no way light can come out of a glass bulb, and humans will never fly, your all conspiracy nuts if you disagree with any of that. also, 1+1 = 3 and if you question that your obviously a conspiracy nut. These jokers are about as credible as a 12 legged horse spider stuttering its abc's
He's absolutely right, Fox News should be taken off the air. Some day, what Fox News has being doing for the past 12 years (and other media outlets) will be considered treason. They are lying to the American public, spewing fascist propaganda which would have made the Nazi's proud.
Your awesome Mr. Barrett! God Bless. You tell em like it is. I love when they feel they are trapped they call reasonably intelligent people nuts. wow.
This guy kicks Hannitys ass,BUT,I dont think it was a controlled demo.The towers came down in about 10 seconds,thats 11 floors a second,they were turned to dust.
As I understand it physics does not allow that to happen,the sheer fact that if you blow out some of the main columns and the top floor crashes into the lower one it must encounter at least some resistance therefore slowing down a little bit.
To turn the towers to dust requires about 67 tons of explosives.
@brainphreak I`m not sure,a new weapon perhaps,it`s just that in every other CCD I have seen on tv and the net I have never seen a building turn to dust like that,particularly as it was from the top down.I`ve done some reading/watching into this and something is just not right with me as far as explosives being used.How do explosives turn the building to dust,if they were to do that the power it would take would most certainly launch some chunks of concrete all the way to Florida.
@brainphreak HHMMMM where is my last reply to this comment,I posted one about DEW.
On this question about Controlled Demo,Please explain to the public just how a CONTROLLED Demo would bring the towers down in 10 seconds,yet in 1 of your latest sdtatements u now freely agree bldg 7 was prob a control tower,for what,fake planes,and demo crews
@brainphreak Just wondering,Do you or any viewers understand FREEFALL SPEED.Freefall is when something,say,falls,or gets DROPPED from a high place and it hits the Ground,thats Freefall,there is NOTHING in the WAY.Problem with towers was there was 110 of them,even if top 30 crash down the other 80 must resist therefore SLOWING the rest down,until NO MORE KINETIC ENERGY TO CONTINUE.
@2000tc88 Why do you think there were electric shut downs under Marvin Bush's ace elevator company, unusual power outages, they were laying the remote controlled RDX and nano-therm.
@RichardRowell1 There is NO evidence of RDX or Nano Thermite,besides Explosives and thermite can not possibly bring 11 storys down every second.Did you even read all of my comment,if you did please tell me just how and WHO carried over 60 tons of explosives up through all the floors,just how long do think that would take.To do a normal demo takes months of planing and setting up.These towers were turned to dust and blew away in the wind.WHAT DONE THAT.
@2000tc88 Visit Journal of 9/11 Studies (dot) com, it's a website from Professor Steven Jones. Let me address you point by point. First, the iron-aluminum-sulfur microspherules collected matched isolated metallurgic samples taken in a controlled environment with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Look it up. Second, the RDX and remote-detonated wireless explosives were rigged in core-columns, 47 of them, the downward trajectory matches "kink", and follows conservation of momentum.
@RichardRowell1 First Bullshit,Second,Are you talking about the same Steven Jones who had a hand in the cover up of cold fusion,the same that worked/s for Los Alamos, the government agency.
Once again government peoiple like YOU FAIL to answer REAL questions.
YOUR POINTS i DID NOT ASK.
I Asked you SPECIFIC questions and you did not answer them.
@2000tc88 There was plenty of time for Ace Elevator company to set up the explosives, the most recent double-blind peer reviewed journal as of late 2009, shows that a hypothesis that fits the data closely demonstrates that red/gray bilayered chips were likely painted on. So this ultrafine exotherm is explosives and detonates explosively at 4000 Celsius, see Jones, Ryan, Harret, et al an infintium be skeptical and logical. Thank you
@2000tc88 Have you visited journalof911studies(dot)com? Don't forget to read my previous two responses, you cant gloss over DATA. You must specifically refute each point, or show how data could support Dr. Wood' theory as I'm guessing you're getting an invisible phenomenon known as DEW support by Dr. Wood. She is a failure. Don't forget you need a source of the energy, it needs to be repeatable (i.e. WTC collapse are matched known observable controlled demolition), top-down.
@2000tc88 Don't forget not all of the 110 floors were turned to dust, not at all, the debris was transported away via trucks for many months, the rest was sitting in a molten pool as evidenced by DOD forward-looking-infrared-radar thermal images. For ex, in October 2001, the site at WTC 7 was still so hot it could melt alumimum...the nanothermite made the top-down affect appear to be generated by planes, pancakes, and hydrocarb fire, read all my posts and specifically refute them or you fail.
@RichardRowell1 Molten Pool,Bullshit Again,the following day it pissed down with rain,and also there was a broken mains water pipe on the same day,surley that would have flooded the BATHTUB but it did not,Surley that would have stopped the search for survivours on the DAY and day after but it did NOT.
Please explain all the TOASTED cars diagonally opposite the towers in the car park that had NO debris anywhere near them,EXPLAIN WTC 7.
@2000tc88 The TOASTED cars come from the pyroclastic flow of the largest controlled demolition in modern history. Thermal Survey of the WTC 9/16/2001 (NASA /US Geological Survey). Despite the fire department efforts to cool the rubble, molten metals would still be extremely hot (up to 1377 degrees F) in some sites 5 days after the incident. This data would fit a large combination of nanothermite which reaches 4000 celsius, and controlled demolition, if it was a nuke where are the alpha, betas?
@RichardRowell1 Pyroclastic Flow??,where do you get this RUBBISH from.If the dust toasted the cars,WHY did`nt all the PEOPLE that got covered in the same PYROCLASTIC FLOW get burned up.It was`nt a volcano.The cars were photographed Toasted BEFORE the towers came down.I have NEVER said they were Nuked.If you want to believe in the Molten metal MYTH and a pyro flow go ahead,you believe in Steven Jones.You are too full of rubbish for me to continue.
@RichardRowell1 Refute what I say with scientific PROOF or you FAIL,I have refuted you at every angle and people will see that,your drivell has FAILED.
You believe in a failed LIAR and the public will see that.
@RichardRowell1 Please explain only one camera from the Pentagon,OHH thats right we ca`nt see the rest because of NATIONAL SECURITY,I think it was BREACHED that day,all beit by Themselves.Explain NO plane debris at Shanksville,Explain why the 5 shots we see here on YT are OWNED by people who are involved with movies or some sort of DIGITAL imaging.
@RichardRowell1 It has everything to do with the thread.I answered your line about Steven Jones,Molten metal,etc:.I will check Nothing out as YOU can not answer or refute my previous comments,you come back with a CRAP answer like this.
That is Typical of people like you,I give you FACTS and you give this CRAP.
So lets see.. You corrected my title.. found you were wrong. You claim Bush mispoke once, found you were wrong.. You quote the commission report which was discredited by its own authors, "I cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."" - You think the federal government had no idea about the hijacking until CNN aired it on tv... and you "really tried'. kinda sad... Try harder next time
@brainphreak The fact that I'm a bad speller doesn't change the fact that the title is missleading. A whistleblower is someone who was involved in the act and brings it to the public attention. The professor was not involved in 911 at all.
After 10 years not one person involved in the alleged conspiracy has come forward. There has been no whistleblowers.
I stand by my original badly spelled comment. The title is missleading.
@seonf - Im sorry but Im afraid you are mistaken about the definition of "whistle blower" even after I quoted it for you in my previous post. Are you here to troll? Just in case you made the honest mistake of not knowing the correct definition. I will again quote the definition of "whistle blower" to correct your mistake.
"A whistleblower is a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities"
No involvement necessary. This is how it is defined
@seonf - BTW Im not sure why you mention your spelling, I did not mention it at all. I only corrected your mistake concerning the definition of whistle blower. Showing you that you do not need to be 'involved' in the act to be a 'whistle blower' as is defined by the english language. Therefore in the 10 years since 9/11 there have been countless whistleblowers, some even involved in the investigation.
Be sure to double check your definitions before trying to correct others.
@brainphreak ok well no internal whistleblowers then. No one involved in planning the conspiracy has come forward. Just public servent's who weren't even there and have no way of knowing what really went on.
@seonf - You wouldnt consider Norman Mineta's testimony about Dick Cheney calling for a stand down, was internal? Norman was in the room with those who had the stand down order, he didnt think it was a good thing and testified to the 9/11 commission. The 9/11 commission was then edited with this testimony removed. It is still available online. I dont think you can get much closer than that? Or Bush talking about seeing the first plane hit the tower even while he was in a classroom.Many testified
If you are referring 2: "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
@brainphreak if you read the quote in the full context you will see
MR. HAMILTON: Let me see if I understand. The plane that was headed toward the Pentagon and was some miles away, there was an order to shoot that plane down.
But none of the kook videos have this part. I wonder why...
@seonf - I fail to understand your point. My point is that Norman was an insider, and he was a whistle blower. He came out mentioning that there was an order to stand down after planes were already scrambled (as is usual procedure). If you read further...
MR. MINETA: Well, I don't know that specifically, but I do know that the airplanes were scrambled from Langley or from Norfolk, the Norfolk area. But I did not know about the orders specifically other than listening to that other conversation
@seonf - So answer me this... If the order was to "shoot down" the plane, and then it was confirmed "does the order still stand?". Why did it not shoot down the plane? If the order stood, and the order was to do so, the plane would be shot down. So are we supposed to believe someone disobeyed orders instead?
As for Bush, do a google search on "President Bush has stated on two occasions that he saw a plane hit World Trade Center 1" - The first hit has info.
@brainphreak google MR. MINETA: And then later I heard of the fact that the airplanes had been scrambled from Langley to come up to DC, but those planes were still about 10 minutes away. That should answer your question
As for whatreallyhappened do you think maybe Bush missspoke and saw the damage from the first plane, but didn't actually see it hit the tower?
@seonf - You see, this is the irony... You come here calling me a conspiracy theorist. Yet you are the one coming up with the theories not based on fact? I would say Bush said exactly what he meant, both times... however you yourself have come up with some conspiracy theory that Bush MEANT something he didnt really say, both times, so it will match YOUR version of the events? When things don't add up you simply put in your own theories and words? Ill stick with facts not conspiracy theory :)
@brainphreak u probably won't believe this but this is from the 911 commission
When American 11 struck the World Trade Center at 8:46, no one in the White House or traveling with the President knew that it had been hijacked. While that information circulated within the FAA, we found no evidence that the hijacking was reported to any other agency in Washington before 8:46.179
Most federal agencies learned about the crash in New York from CNN.
Braces for u 2 say report is part of the conspiracy
@seonf - Well considering those who actually wrote the 9/11 commission report discredited their own report and said they were 'thwarted' from doing a proper investigation, I wouldnt say it is the most credible. Specially considering this is an important fact that would be used to show failures, aka heads would roll.
Do you honestly believe this? "Most federal agencies learned about the crash in New York from CNN."
I guess it could be true since "most" federal agencies do not deal with planes.
@seonf - So the question YOU should have is... Why does the words you heard out of the presidents mouth on more than one occasion differ from the official 9/11 report? and why do the people who wrote the official report, say that the report was not done correctly and is basically useless? These are things I am not making up, these are questions normal people have. "Why does the president say something other than what we observe?" or "why was the investigation discredited and never finished?"
"Former Sen. Max Cleland, who resigned from the commission last November with the words, "Bush is scamming America."
"we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before September 11 than it has ever admitted.... "
"I cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."
What if it was your murder investigation? Is this a report you would put your faith in?
@seonf - Sorry it was the commission itself which discredited its own report, I think you are stuck in 2005. Do you also still think it was a pancake collapse? Even thought this was discredited by NIST? Just checking to see if you have any updated info, or are sticking to those old outdated reports.
@seonf - So let me get this right, in your version of the events. Bush consistently mispoke twice, the discredited 9/11 commission report was accurate even though discredited by the authors, and the federal agencies had no clue of problems in the sky until CNN aired the crash on tv... The drills that took place the same day emulating the same scenario was merely coincidence. We had no idea this kind of attack could take place. The government known to lie, is completely honest this time RE: 9/11
@seonf - Hmm... Well as for advanced knowledge, do you honestly think there was none? they have come out publically mentioning there were warnings? the FBI was following several of the hijackers already? Do you honestly not know this public info? You can really say with an honest conscious that you think we had no idea an attack like that could happen? Also that drill was not carried out every year... your making false claims and are unable to back them. As expected.
Its funny that you think there can be a wargame emulating the exact same type of attacks, during the exact attacks, and that the government still had no idea this TYPE of attack could even occur... They KNEW it could occur, and have emulated the attacks and prepared for them many times. The government KNEW that planes could be used as weapons, do you think otherwise? Do you think that they were ignorant that this kind of thing could happen? and just made drills based off of impossible scenarios?
@seonf - Sounds like you have some conspiracy theories yourself. You are assuming Bush mis-spoke even though he does not say that himself. Why do you theorize these things without any evidence? He apparently 'mispoke' several times after that too... Even described what he saw. Do you think it was all a large series of coincidences? coincidentally all these major players mis-spoke, and it was a coincidence that the drills emulated the exact attack scenario? or people were warned ahead of time?
"Encourage people to look at the evidence and come to their own conclusions" ahahahah it is clear to anyone with an education to see that truthers have no evidence only a pile of bullshit stories and lies. It is easy for anyone with an education to conclude that truthers are fucking morons.
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
man i wish he was my teacher... fuck sean hannity and alan colmes and fox news for that matter. why do they think they speak for regular americans who believe everything their gov tells them? im surprised hannity doesnt come out and say its unpatriotic to think critically
But do you agree or not? It's been 10 years and there is no scientific evidence for the truthers and they are still out there yelling that everyone else is crazy. They sound like fundamentalist Christians.
@TheOtherView - Its a lot easier to prove something happened, than prove it didnt. The real question you should ask, why isnt there real proof of who did it? who funded it? why it happened? etc. Why was there so much of a cover up? The fact is that over half of the commission who investigated 9/11 have come out saying it was a farce, that they were prevented from collecting proper data, and obstructed from justice. So much so that at least one of them has wrote a book about his disgust.
@TheOtherView - There is solid proof on the "truther" side that things like "foreknowledge" was present all over. From warnings to people working in the towers, to warnings to people who were to fly on the flights, then there was exact drills on these scenarios but then the official statements from goverment that "they had no idea" this kind of attack could occur, that they could not have imagined. Yet the exact scenario was practiced? There is actually a lot of evidence and proof of a coverup
No, that's because i know what evidence is and is not. The fact that someone strings coincidences and strange events together doesn't tell us much about what really occured. The fact that this is the first building made of a certain material and structure to collapse due to fire does not necessrily mean anything. The fact that Bush responded oddly when he was notified does not support the veracity of your claim. There have not been any peer reviewed studes supporting your side.
also wanna add that its pretty obvious that the guy interviewing him is deliberately trying to make him look like an idiot. But he saw it coming and won the arguement. I dont have respect for people that ask you a question and then dont listen to an answer. Bad journalism.
you do not need to be a scientist to see that the buildings were brought down in a controlled demolition. I knew it when i saw it as we had tv programs on in the UK when i was a kid showing how its done. It taught me that buildings of that size do not just come down withouth having to have bombs on many of the levels. Now ive researched it i KNOW it was an inside job and so does the 2000 architects on a site i saw recently. Facts are facts.
Hannity is an asshole and fits perfectly with the bullshit that comes out of the foxes mouthes!!!!.....And as far as the interview goes, it's the epitome of "The truth hurts sometimes"
LOL, got to love delusional Sean Hannity a former bartender who attended two universities and graduated from neither claiming that the professor is not competent to teach a class. Got to love delusional Sean Hannity for calling someone else an extremist.
Only the brain dead would believe anyone from Fox News. Fox News caters to mob mentality like the Roman Circus where victims are fed to the lions. Fox News is Fear News, they tell you what to fear and you become so confused you don't realize they contradict themselves, constantly.
@terrymanning1 - Sorry, those were quotes. I was under the impression you read the book since you said "truthers are scum" implying "liars are great!" which is much like "war is peace" or "black is white" haha. There is a book you should read called "1984" then you will not be confused by the very popular quotes I posted. You may quickly look up the term "newspeak" on wikipedia also to understand what your form of speech is classified under :)
@terrymanning1 - Oh sorry, I should have known. You are one of those extremists who has a 9/11 truther fetish. Nice background on your page, it was kinda funny. I know your type, searching out truther videos all day like porn just so you can get your rocks off posting repetitive and meaningless comments on videos :) I will not feed the trolls :)
how come If you dont believe the Official 9/11 Comission Report, you are not American. You should be shot for questioning the government. You are a nut. this sounds like sudam hussein shit. i just dont get it.
The fact is.. A lot of people dont believe/understand the official 9/11 comission report and they have questions. Yet, when they ask these questions...they are called conspiracy theorist. Its our right to ask questions. We are not obligated to except everythin the gov or tv says as truth
I just don't understand how the "truthers" (on either side of the spectrum) can say that they are right and the other side is wrong. I have studied the 9/11 for a long time and have seen evidence on both sides, so the only conclusion I come to is "I don't know". However, I don't just easily accept information given to me by either side. Easily trusting 9/11 conspiracy theory videos, is just as bad as easily trusting government. Neither side has been able to convince me without doubt of the truth
KEvin Barrett is not a whistleblower. By definition a whistleblower needs to have first hand knowledge. Kevin Barrett has nothing but speculation, conjecture and fantasy.
It's an established Communist tactic to destroy a culture through perpetuating lies & propaganda that go against important facts of a nation in order to build waves of doubt, manufactured dissent, and disbelief in the established legit authority. This not only weakens the nation, but also causes the establishment to waste time & resources either fighting or trying to correct these falsehoods. It also weakens their authority, and thus breeds a lack of allegiance amongst the populace.
Hannity is a Jew shill. What about all the Jew and communist professors that have been holding college students captive for the last 5 decades forcing them to regurgitate their liberal sh*t which you claim to be opposed to?
Hannity is a Jew shill. What about all the Jew and communist professors that have been holding college students captive for the last 5 decades forcing them to regurgitate their liberal sh*t which you claim to be opposed to?
I hate that Sean Hannity motherfucker. He was very rude to Kevin Barret and interrupted him and belittled him like the right wing GOP cocksucker that he is. I would love to catch that prick coming out of a bar and kick the fucking shit out of his cocky ass.
Leave it to the Truthy cult to get their vital scientific and engineering info from a Muslim whackjob, whose degree is in ... are you ready? ... African history and folklore.
Still waiting for you clowns to find even one deranged engineer to publish an engineering paper proving your crackpot little theories.
Ten years, and this is the best you can do? How embarrassing.
@MsgtSpook it's really up to you believers to prove who did it and how beyond a shadow of a doubt as a court would require. A tape that looks like Morgan Freeman in a robe claiming responsibility wouldn't even be admissible in court because of the flaws and any lawyer would have pointed out several flaws to make a jury doubt it. There is no evidence to support the official US conspiracy in the 911 Report. I'm guessing you don't know enough about demolition to know a controlled one.
Kevin you are great! The way that you finish your thoughts and sentences although they want to cut you off is incredible and inspiring! I love to watch those clips where you verbally kick their asses by telling the truth! Good job.
It's not about being a kooky "conspiracy theorist;" it's about not automatically giving the benefit of the doubt to a government that has proven over and over, that they do not DESERVE the benefit of the doubt. Anyone who just automatically accepts what the powers-that-be tell us, ought to be ashamed of themselves. And watching this shit that passes for news, ought to make even the stupidest person aware of the fact that the media is complicit in governmental shenanigans.
Gulf Of Tonkin, Iraq War, Operation Northwoods, MK-ULTRA, Iran Contra, JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon, TWA 800, Pan-Am 103, and who knows what else? In ALL of those "incidents," the government LIED to it's people. WHY does ANYONE in this fucking country, trust one word that comes out of the government's pie hole?!
professor is 100% correct these bastards should not be on tv get air time, fukin bastard lying scum bags, sold out souls, notice how pig hanitty never looks @ camera when he says" you believe 911 was inside job" hahah you filthy scumbag hannity just like snake fag homles.
911 truth, They Murdered period, i dont care how many politicians, rich family names or high ranking military have to swing by the neck till dead for this, 911 truth is the single best thing NOW for this world, just Imagine worldwide if ALL the elite criminals are kicked out of the positions of power, how human kind would bond as we would suddenly be made aware of all the chess games we have been apart of , yet we were Never asked to play the GAME, they brought terror into our lifes.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Kevin Barrett is a pathetic nutjob, who has reverted to interrupting public speakers in an infantile display of attention mongering. Why? Because no one else will listen to him. Even his beloved left wing thought leaders such as Chomsky and Amy Goodman pay no heed. He has become the laughing stock of the academic, political, and social standard bearers he so admires. He has the nerve to cite Morgan Reynolds? Who has turned into a bigger laughing stock than he has. RIP Barrett's reputation, alas.
@bman342 Kevin Barrett is a hero who has spoken the truth about 9/11. He shows great courage and great intelligence...have you looked into any of the 9/11 information? Obviously you can't face the truth. But rest assured it will come out. Rest assured.
@jackiesglitter Barrett wouldn't know 'truth' if it smacked him right between the eyes. For someone who professes critical thinking skills to posit that he "KNOWS 9/11 was an inside job" based upon flimsy evidence is not only disingenuous, but moronic. To suggest that 100 million people in the US agree 9/11 was an IJ, from a complete (intentional) misread of a NYTime survey, is spreading vile propaganda. And to suggest that every NYC cop/fireman was counting down WTC7 collapse is pure idiocy.
@bman342 - And dont you find it sad that you are even more pathetic than him? you have resorted to logging into youtube and searching for all 9/11 'truther' videos so you can comment negatively about how you hate 'truthers'... I always wonder about people like you.. If you hate "truthers", does this mean you love "liars"? I really dont get the whole idea of lumping together all different types of people with questions and calling them 'truthers' to ignore speaking about topics relating to truth?
@brainphreak ROFL, because you call yourselves truthers, or adherants to the 9/11 Truth "movement", that means you automatically have a monopoly on the Truth?? So if I called myself a millionaire I would automatically be one? That is typical of the idiotic logic displayed by so many truthers. And, yes, I dislike truthers as they represent a belief set that is anathema to me. Similar to how I feel about nazis, skinheads, anti-Semites, white supremists, and a host of other bigots. Sorry.
@bman342 - I do not call myself a truther, that I have never done. In fact I do not know anyone who does call themselves a "truther". The name was created by people like you who wish to classify people. Its funny that you do not condone bigotry and yourself say "I dislike truthers". Just to be sure you are aware of what a bigot is, I will follow this comment with the true definition. Its not uncommon, but you yourself claiming to condemn bigotry can scientifically be defined as a bigot.
@brainphreak Did I NOT say "or adherants to the 9/11 truth movement"? (it's just quicker to say 'truther'). This is another typical truther tactic: taking words/comments out of context, or playing semantical games as you did in an earlier post by suggesting the official story is also a conspiracy. Just like people who say that Semites are everyone from the middle-east therefore anti-Semite applies to arabs as well. Wrong. It's the commonly accepted meaning NOT the "technical" meaning.
@bman342 - Definition of Bigot: A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
This defines you. One who lumps every person with a differing belief into a category as "truthers" simply because they ask questions related to 911. You then find related videos on youtube , to condemn differing beliefs and show intolerance and animosity. You are defined a bigot.
@brainphreak Yadda yadda, you missed the point, again. Reread. In my post, I wasn't claiming to condemn bigotry, I was giving examples of the contempt I hold for people whose beliefs and tactics I find contemptible. I don't condemn those with different beliefs just those I find repugnant, and I mentioned some above. The "asking questions" thing is another myth of the truthers. Sheen says to the public he has questions, yet when addressing a truther conference was very clear in his accusations.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?
@nicenonya3 Interesting that in your twisted pathetic world that's how truth is determined. The only thing being shoved is your head into your ass. Impressive that you can still type.
@defragen1 Putzbrain, do you have anything to say besides schoolyard insults? Though not surprising coming from a truthtard, c'mon you're making it way too easy for me, and too boring. Yawn.
@quinsedlethorpid Am going to take a stab and assume that you think 65% of Americans believe in the "inside job" nonsense. If so, you're a certified idiot. Another truthrard bites the dust, LMFAO.
@bman342 well yea you moron I read the statistics, not to mention im reading these comments and you're obviously a minority here. can you please explain to me how WTC 7 collapsed? please? or why they wont release the pentagon footage?...
@quinsedlethorpid I'm a minority here? I'd also be a minority if I walked into an insane asylum. Don't mean to tax your brain, but see where I'm going with this? No. you tell ME what possible purpose was achieved by "demolishing" building 7? The world got the message with the destruction of the towers. What idiot planning this would think it makes sense to "demolish" another building 7-8 hrs after, and in so doing make it appear as CD? Read NIST report to understand the collapse of blg 7.
@bman342 I've read the "official" report and you still cant explain to me how WTC7 fell. go for it! have you ever heard of collecting insurance money?? because that's exactly what happened right after. the point is.. yes.. you are a minority here and your media brainwashed small mind is fortunately also a minority. look at the polls. I shouldn't have to argue FACTS
@quinsedlethorpid Oh lordy, so you actually believe that Larry Silverstein got on national TV and admitted that he demolished Blg 7. And I'M brainwashed? And you read all 10.000 of the NIST Report? That's beyond laughable. For the record, please cite ANY poll that has the majority of Americans believing that 9/11 was an Inside Job. Or that it was done for insurance. Won't hold my breath.
@quinsedlethorpid Hey misanthropid, that is the problem. All you guys do is use your eyes and not your brains. You'll condemn governments, both municipal, state, and federal, based upon "well it Looked like controlled demolition". Using "it looked like..." as proof, is why NO ONE (ie, worldwide legitimate media) believe you putzes. Buh-bye.
Hannity is an asshole. I bet he hasn't even looked at the WTC 7 footage. He hasn't even asked why the pentagon won't release any of the 86 videos of a plane hitting the pentagon. There isn't one video showing a plane. What the hell is wrong with the "media". They are going out of business because they tell stories instead of actual news.
This has been flagged as spam show
Follow the rabbit hole
I
I
I
v
DocumentaryArchive 1 week ago
This proffessor did not come here looking for a fight. He was really sincere and mostly under control until the very end when he was provoked. I cant understand the frustration of the hosts because they absolutely and whole-heartedly disagree - but this is now the second video in a row Ive seen of this Hannity and Colmes show (Im Australian so I don't know it) where Hannity just does a Bill O'Reilly and starts talking over them and being obtuse. Makes for good TV but its pretty crappy.
Lochsabre 1 week ago
I'm pretty sure our shapechanging lizard overlords were behind 9/11.
weejockpoopongmcplop 2 weeks ago
Minority is a term for a group not in control. The numbers do not matter
impalher1982 3 weeks ago
@impalher1982 Funny...I've always heard Syria described as being ruled by the MINORITY Alawite sect.
weejockpoopongmcplop 2 weeks ago
Another conspiracy theory nutjob. He should be sent to Afghanistan with the kuran shoved up his but hole.
jimahr 2 months ago
Another nut job activist/conspiracy theorist jackwod.
jimahr 2 months ago
@gnossticc - yep something definitely went down in building 7, probably the control tower for the entire thing, but thats pure speculation. It was definitely 'destroyed' for purposes of getting rid of evidence. Who knows how or why, but thats not as important as who and when. It seems nobody even cares about 'what' unfortunately at this time.
brainphreak 2 months ago
@brainphreak I have thought a similar thing, [ 7 used as control tower], just recently I saw a video that implied that. A lot of people put Dr Judy Wood and John Hutchison down,but in some of his experiments he points a wand like thing at what he wants to get a reaction out of and then it reacts to the field effect.Who`s to say the govmnt has`nt perfected this,there could have been something pointing at the towers from 7,however that still leaves questions about 7 itself.
2000tc88 2 months ago
Hannity's words just reek of corporate Mafia propaganda!
LuvBugLuvver 2 months ago
So much neuro-linguistic programming in this interview; I think I might start watching Fox News just for the entertainment XD
Moshikashitenai 2 months ago
I live in england and i have never seen anyone as rude as hannity ever, why do intelligent people take his bullshit!!
muslimah871 2 months ago
@muslimah871 , intelligent people in the US is a dying breed.
PungiFungi 2 months ago
fox news is a big joke ...the anchormen are so corrupted.... !!!! most of them hate muslims because of thier ignorance and because they were brainwashed and that blinds them enough not to even try to seek the information/truth ..cheap lost souls
Adagio930 3 months ago in playlist More videos from brainphreak
Comment removed
Adagio930 3 months ago in playlist More videos from brainphreak
If using critical thinking and applying laws of physics to come to a reasonable and logical conclusion makes you a *nut* or a *nutcase*, then I am so goddamn insane it's not even funny. The world is flat, there's no way light can come out of a glass bulb, and humans will never fly, your all conspiracy nuts if you disagree with any of that. also, 1+1 = 3 and if you question that your obviously a conspiracy nut. These jokers are about as credible as a 12 legged horse spider stuttering its abc's
ciocod 4 months ago 2
@ciocod Righteous
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
He's absolutely right, Fox News should be taken off the air. Some day, what Fox News has being doing for the past 12 years (and other media outlets) will be considered treason. They are lying to the American public, spewing fascist propaganda which would have made the Nazi's proud.
Bawbster1 4 months ago
Your awesome Mr. Barrett! God Bless. You tell em like it is. I love when they feel they are trapped they call reasonably intelligent people nuts. wow.
vilmoroth 5 months ago
Hannity is an inside Job!
TLKTXUSA1 5 months ago
This guy kicks Hannitys ass,BUT,I dont think it was a controlled demo.The towers came down in about 10 seconds,thats 11 floors a second,they were turned to dust.
As I understand it physics does not allow that to happen,the sheer fact that if you blow out some of the main columns and the top floor crashes into the lower one it must encounter at least some resistance therefore slowing down a little bit.
To turn the towers to dust requires about 67 tons of explosives.
Who carried that up there.
2000tc88 5 months ago
@2000tc88 - I am curious, if not controlled demolition, but still freefall speed. What do you think happened?
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak I`m not sure,a new weapon perhaps,it`s just that in every other CCD I have seen on tv and the net I have never seen a building turn to dust like that,particularly as it was from the top down.I`ve done some reading/watching into this and something is just not right with me as far as explosives being used.How do explosives turn the building to dust,if they were to do that the power it would take would most certainly launch some chunks of concrete all the way to Florida.
2000tc88 5 months ago
@brainphreak HHMMMM where is my last reply to this comment,I posted one about DEW.
On this question about Controlled Demo,Please explain to the public just how a CONTROLLED Demo would bring the towers down in 10 seconds,yet in 1 of your latest sdtatements u now freely agree bldg 7 was prob a control tower,for what,fake planes,and demo crews
2000tc88 2 months ago
@brainphreak Just wondering,Do you or any viewers understand FREEFALL SPEED.Freefall is when something,say,falls,or gets DROPPED from a high place and it hits the Ground,thats Freefall,there is NOTHING in the WAY.Problem with towers was there was 110 of them,even if top 30 crash down the other 80 must resist therefore SLOWING the rest down,until NO MORE KINETIC ENERGY TO CONTINUE.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 So if you don't think it was a controlled demolition does that mean you believe 19 muslims did it?
jabe55 4 months ago
@jabe55 no
2000tc88 4 months ago
@2000tc88 Why do you think there were electric shut downs under Marvin Bush's ace elevator company, unusual power outages, they were laying the remote controlled RDX and nano-therm.
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 There is NO evidence of RDX or Nano Thermite,besides Explosives and thermite can not possibly bring 11 storys down every second.Did you even read all of my comment,if you did please tell me just how and WHO carried over 60 tons of explosives up through all the floors,just how long do think that would take.To do a normal demo takes months of planing and setting up.These towers were turned to dust and blew away in the wind.WHAT DONE THAT.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 Visit Journal of 9/11 Studies (dot) com, it's a website from Professor Steven Jones. Let me address you point by point. First, the iron-aluminum-sulfur microspherules collected matched isolated metallurgic samples taken in a controlled environment with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Look it up. Second, the RDX and remote-detonated wireless explosives were rigged in core-columns, 47 of them, the downward trajectory matches "kink", and follows conservation of momentum.
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 First Bullshit,Second,Are you talking about the same Steven Jones who had a hand in the cover up of cold fusion,the same that worked/s for Los Alamos, the government agency.
Once again government peoiple like YOU FAIL to answer REAL questions.
YOUR POINTS i DID NOT ASK.
I Asked you SPECIFIC questions and you did not answer them.
TYPICAL
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 There was plenty of time for Ace Elevator company to set up the explosives, the most recent double-blind peer reviewed journal as of late 2009, shows that a hypothesis that fits the data closely demonstrates that red/gray bilayered chips were likely painted on. So this ultrafine exotherm is explosives and detonates explosively at 4000 Celsius, see Jones, Ryan, Harret, et al an infintium be skeptical and logical. Thank you
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 Bullshit,Paint shit on that takes a 110 story tower down symetricaly,no, you people are over the top,
9/11 studies,Professor Steven Jones,Haha,You believe him,he that was involved in the coverup of cold fusion and is proven.
Even the Wanker FETZER dis-owned Jones.
Do`nt believe in Jones,do some more research.
Your going down the wrong path
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 Have you visited journalof911studies(dot)com? Don't forget to read my previous two responses, you cant gloss over DATA. You must specifically refute each point, or show how data could support Dr. Wood' theory as I'm guessing you're getting an invisible phenomenon known as DEW support by Dr. Wood. She is a failure. Don't forget you need a source of the energy, it needs to be repeatable (i.e. WTC collapse are matched known observable controlled demolition), top-down.
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
@2000tc88 Don't forget not all of the 110 floors were turned to dust, not at all, the debris was transported away via trucks for many months, the rest was sitting in a molten pool as evidenced by DOD forward-looking-infrared-radar thermal images. For ex, in October 2001, the site at WTC 7 was still so hot it could melt alumimum...the nanothermite made the top-down affect appear to be generated by planes, pancakes, and hydrocarb fire, read all my posts and specifically refute them or you fail.
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 Molten Pool,Bullshit Again,the following day it pissed down with rain,and also there was a broken mains water pipe on the same day,surley that would have flooded the BATHTUB but it did not,Surley that would have stopped the search for survivours on the DAY and day after but it did NOT.
Please explain all the TOASTED cars diagonally opposite the towers in the car park that had NO debris anywhere near them,EXPLAIN WTC 7.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 The TOASTED cars come from the pyroclastic flow of the largest controlled demolition in modern history. Thermal Survey of the WTC 9/16/2001 (NASA /US Geological Survey). Despite the fire department efforts to cool the rubble, molten metals would still be extremely hot (up to 1377 degrees F) in some sites 5 days after the incident. This data would fit a large combination of nanothermite which reaches 4000 celsius, and controlled demolition, if it was a nuke where are the alpha, betas?
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 Pyroclastic Flow??,where do you get this RUBBISH from.If the dust toasted the cars,WHY did`nt all the PEOPLE that got covered in the same PYROCLASTIC FLOW get burned up.It was`nt a volcano.The cars were photographed Toasted BEFORE the towers came down.I have NEVER said they were Nuked.If you want to believe in the Molten metal MYTH and a pyro flow go ahead,you believe in Steven Jones.You are too full of rubbish for me to continue.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 Refute what I say with scientific PROOF or you FAIL,I have refuted you at every angle and people will see that,your drivell has FAILED.
You believe in a failed LIAR and the public will see that.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 Please explain only one camera from the Pentagon,OHH thats right we ca`nt see the rest because of NATIONAL SECURITY,I think it was BREACHED that day,all beit by Themselves.Explain NO plane debris at Shanksville,Explain why the 5 shots we see here on YT are OWNED by people who are involved with movies or some sort of DIGITAL imaging.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 That's a non-sequitur digression, check out the sounds of the airplane coming into the WTC's on my channel from ground level amateur video.
RichardRowell1 2 months ago
@RichardRowell1 It has everything to do with the thread.I answered your line about Steven Jones,Molten metal,etc:.I will check Nothing out as YOU can not answer or refute my previous comments,you come back with a CRAP answer like this.
That is Typical of people like you,I give you FACTS and you give this CRAP.
Non-Sequitur Shit
2000tc88 2 months ago
Hannity's already made up his mind
he is in no way represenitive of all conservitves !
Librals & some conservitives alike stick tto what they are 1st told sometimes
In fact, that part shouldnt even be an issue,
What does suck,ids hannity not allowing this guy to finish answering a question
& letting anyone see exactly what he be,ieves & why, very poor reporting,
if he would listen & then ask tough questions if he sees a theory flaw, FINE
but this is censorship, Susan Lindauer has info
ncwdane 5 months ago
So lets see.. You corrected my title.. found you were wrong. You claim Bush mispoke once, found you were wrong.. You quote the commission report which was discredited by its own authors, "I cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."" - You think the federal government had no idea about the hijacking until CNN aired it on tv... and you "really tried'. kinda sad... Try harder next time
brainphreak 5 months ago
What? A professor is not a whistleblower! Whoever made that subject title is an idiot.
seonf 6 months ago
@seonf - And you are no English teacher... try opening a book next time before commenting.
Definition of whistleblower - A whistleblower is a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities
At least learn to use a dictionary before trying to 'correct' others, you just end up looking stupid and like you are crying out for attention.
Now you know what an actual whistle-blower is making the "subject title" as accurate as can be.
brainphreak 6 months ago
@brainphreak The fact that I'm a bad speller doesn't change the fact that the title is missleading. A whistleblower is someone who was involved in the act and brings it to the public attention. The professor was not involved in 911 at all.
After 10 years not one person involved in the alleged conspiracy has come forward. There has been no whistleblowers.
I stand by my original badly spelled comment. The title is missleading.
seonf 6 months ago
@seonf - Im sorry but Im afraid you are mistaken about the definition of "whistle blower" even after I quoted it for you in my previous post. Are you here to troll? Just in case you made the honest mistake of not knowing the correct definition. I will again quote the definition of "whistle blower" to correct your mistake.
"A whistleblower is a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities"
No involvement necessary. This is how it is defined
brainphreak 6 months ago
@seonf - BTW Im not sure why you mention your spelling, I did not mention it at all. I only corrected your mistake concerning the definition of whistle blower. Showing you that you do not need to be 'involved' in the act to be a 'whistle blower' as is defined by the english language. Therefore in the 10 years since 9/11 there have been countless whistleblowers, some even involved in the investigation.
Be sure to double check your definitions before trying to correct others.
brainphreak 6 months ago
@brainphreak ok well no internal whistleblowers then. No one involved in planning the conspiracy has come forward. Just public servent's who weren't even there and have no way of knowing what really went on.
seonf 6 months ago
@seonf - You wouldnt consider Norman Mineta's testimony about Dick Cheney calling for a stand down, was internal? Norman was in the room with those who had the stand down order, he didnt think it was a good thing and testified to the 9/11 commission. The 9/11 commission was then edited with this testimony removed. It is still available online. I dont think you can get much closer than that? Or Bush talking about seeing the first plane hit the tower even while he was in a classroom.Many testified
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak
If you are referring 2: "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
seonf 5 months ago
@brainphreak if you read the quote in the full context you will see
MR. HAMILTON: Let me see if I understand. The plane that was headed toward the Pentagon and was some miles away, there was an order to shoot that plane down.
But none of the kook videos have this part. I wonder why...
seonf 5 months ago
@seonf - I fail to understand your point. My point is that Norman was an insider, and he was a whistle blower. He came out mentioning that there was an order to stand down after planes were already scrambled (as is usual procedure). If you read further...
MR. MINETA: Well, I don't know that specifically, but I do know that the airplanes were scrambled from Langley or from Norfolk, the Norfolk area. But I did not know about the orders specifically other than listening to that other conversation
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak mr Hamilton revealed it was a SHOOT DOWN order!
What other times did Bush say he saw the first plane hit?
seonf 5 months ago
@seonf - So answer me this... If the order was to "shoot down" the plane, and then it was confirmed "does the order still stand?". Why did it not shoot down the plane? If the order stood, and the order was to do so, the plane would be shot down. So are we supposed to believe someone disobeyed orders instead?
As for Bush, do a google search on "President Bush has stated on two occasions that he saw a plane hit World Trade Center 1" - The first hit has info.
Is your theory, someone disobeyed?
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak google MR. MINETA: And then later I heard of the fact that the airplanes had been scrambled from Langley to come up to DC, but those planes were still about 10 minutes away. That should answer your question
As for whatreallyhappened do you think maybe Bush missspoke and saw the damage from the first plane, but didn't actually see it hit the tower?
seonf 5 months ago
@seonf - You see, this is the irony... You come here calling me a conspiracy theorist. Yet you are the one coming up with the theories not based on fact? I would say Bush said exactly what he meant, both times... however you yourself have come up with some conspiracy theory that Bush MEANT something he didnt really say, both times, so it will match YOUR version of the events? When things don't add up you simply put in your own theories and words? Ill stick with facts not conspiracy theory :)
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak u probably won't believe this but this is from the 911 commission
When American 11 struck the World Trade Center at 8:46, no one in the White House or traveling with the President knew that it had been hijacked. While that information circulated within the FAA, we found no evidence that the hijacking was reported to any other agency in Washington before 8:46.179
Most federal agencies learned about the crash in New York from CNN.
Braces for u 2 say report is part of the conspiracy
seonf 5 months ago
@seonf - Well considering those who actually wrote the 9/11 commission report discredited their own report and said they were 'thwarted' from doing a proper investigation, I wouldnt say it is the most credible. Specially considering this is an important fact that would be used to show failures, aka heads would roll.
Do you honestly believe this? "Most federal agencies learned about the crash in New York from CNN."
I guess it could be true since "most" federal agencies do not deal with planes.
brainphreak 5 months ago
@seonf - So the question YOU should have is... Why does the words you heard out of the presidents mouth on more than one occasion differ from the official 9/11 report? and why do the people who wrote the official report, say that the report was not done correctly and is basically useless? These are things I am not making up, these are questions normal people have. "Why does the president say something other than what we observe?" or "why was the investigation discredited and never finished?"
brainphreak 5 months ago
"Former Sen. Max Cleland, who resigned from the commission last November with the words, "Bush is scamming America."
"we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before September 11 than it has ever admitted.... "
"I cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."
What if it was your murder investigation? Is this a report you would put your faith in?
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak *sigh* I knew you'd try and discredit the 911 commission report, you kooks are so predictable. I tried, I really did...
seonf 5 months ago
@seonf - Sorry it was the commission itself which discredited its own report, I think you are stuck in 2005. Do you also still think it was a pancake collapse? Even thought this was discredited by NIST? Just checking to see if you have any updated info, or are sticking to those old outdated reports.
brainphreak 5 months ago
@seonf - So let me get this right, in your version of the events. Bush consistently mispoke twice, the discredited 9/11 commission report was accurate even though discredited by the authors, and the federal agencies had no clue of problems in the sky until CNN aired the crash on tv... The drills that took place the same day emulating the same scenario was merely coincidence. We had no idea this kind of attack could take place. The government known to lie, is completely honest this time RE: 9/11
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak You think a war game that was carried out from year to year is proof of advanced knowledge?
seonf 5 months ago
@seonf - Hmm... Well as for advanced knowledge, do you honestly think there was none? they have come out publically mentioning there were warnings? the FBI was following several of the hijackers already? Do you honestly not know this public info? You can really say with an honest conscious that you think we had no idea an attack like that could happen? Also that drill was not carried out every year... your making false claims and are unable to back them. As expected.
brainphreak 5 months ago
Its funny that you think there can be a wargame emulating the exact same type of attacks, during the exact attacks, and that the government still had no idea this TYPE of attack could even occur... They KNEW it could occur, and have emulated the attacks and prepared for them many times. The government KNEW that planes could be used as weapons, do you think otherwise? Do you think that they were ignorant that this kind of thing could happen? and just made drills based off of impossible scenarios?
brainphreak 5 months ago
@brainphreak And Bush miss speaking is just proof he is a moron, what else is new?
seonf 5 months ago
@seonf - Sounds like you have some conspiracy theories yourself. You are assuming Bush mis-spoke even though he does not say that himself. Why do you theorize these things without any evidence? He apparently 'mispoke' several times after that too... Even described what he saw. Do you think it was all a large series of coincidences? coincidentally all these major players mis-spoke, and it was a coincidence that the drills emulated the exact attack scenario? or people were warned ahead of time?
brainphreak 5 months ago
"Encourage people to look at the evidence and come to their own conclusions" ahahahah it is clear to anyone with an education to see that truthers have no evidence only a pile of bullshit stories and lies. It is easy for anyone with an education to conclude that truthers are fucking morons.
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 6 months ago
man i wish he was my teacher... fuck sean hannity and alan colmes and fox news for that matter. why do they think they speak for regular americans who believe everything their gov tells them? im surprised hannity doesnt come out and say its unpatriotic to think critically
pat442389 6 months ago
The length that people will go to draw attention. There is still no evidence that 9-11 was an inside job and it's 10 years later.
TheOtherView 7 months ago
RE: "@TheOtherView - The length that people will go to draw attention."
Can someone say "irony"? hehe
brainphreak 7 months ago
@brainphreak
Cute line. I'll give you that.
But do you agree or not? It's been 10 years and there is no scientific evidence for the truthers and they are still out there yelling that everyone else is crazy. They sound like fundamentalist Christians.
TheOtherView 7 months ago
@TheOtherView - Its a lot easier to prove something happened, than prove it didnt. The real question you should ask, why isnt there real proof of who did it? who funded it? why it happened? etc. Why was there so much of a cover up? The fact is that over half of the commission who investigated 9/11 have come out saying it was a farce, that they were prevented from collecting proper data, and obstructed from justice. So much so that at least one of them has wrote a book about his disgust.
brainphreak 7 months ago
@TheOtherView - There is solid proof on the "truther" side that things like "foreknowledge" was present all over. From warnings to people working in the towers, to warnings to people who were to fly on the flights, then there was exact drills on these scenarios but then the official statements from goverment that "they had no idea" this kind of attack could occur, that they could not have imagined. Yet the exact scenario was practiced? There is actually a lot of evidence and proof of a coverup
brainphreak 7 months ago
@TheOtherView thats because you're a stupid, simple minded person
fillyferz 6 months ago
@fillyferz
No, that's because i know what evidence is and is not. The fact that someone strings coincidences and strange events together doesn't tell us much about what really occured. The fact that this is the first building made of a certain material and structure to collapse due to fire does not necessrily mean anything. The fact that Bush responded oddly when he was notified does not support the veracity of your claim. There have not been any peer reviewed studes supporting your side.
TheOtherView 6 months ago
my god, i cant believe how stupid truthers can look and they do it with a smile....
Zero2Legend 7 months ago
@Zero2Legend gagaga so you think sean hannity looked more intelligent??
designcliche 7 months ago
I remember this well from back then and love to watch it over and over on shutting the mouthpeice mouths of H & C as they spew their venom.
SuperHardshell 7 months ago
also wanna add that its pretty obvious that the guy interviewing him is deliberately trying to make him look like an idiot. But he saw it coming and won the arguement. I dont have respect for people that ask you a question and then dont listen to an answer. Bad journalism.
luchiadance 7 months ago
you do not need to be a scientist to see that the buildings were brought down in a controlled demolition. I knew it when i saw it as we had tv programs on in the UK when i was a kid showing how its done. It taught me that buildings of that size do not just come down withouth having to have bombs on many of the levels. Now ive researched it i KNOW it was an inside job and so does the 2000 architects on a site i saw recently. Facts are facts.
luchiadance 7 months ago
Hannity is an asshole and fits perfectly with the bullshit that comes out of the foxes mouthes!!!!.....And as far as the interview goes, it's the epitome of "The truth hurts sometimes"
zimbobway54 7 months ago
Fuck you Sean Hannity.
tooniverse 7 months ago 5
hannity......ur a waste of skin and should be ashamed.....bow to ur masters...ur day will come =)
lilmissheidi 8 months ago
YEAH, THE PROF. ATE 'EM UP
balancedeath 8 months ago
LOL, got to love delusional Sean Hannity a former bartender who attended two universities and graduated from neither claiming that the professor is not competent to teach a class. Got to love delusional Sean Hannity for calling someone else an extremist.
....
Is this guy for real or is it brain damage?
MACKATTACK1970 8 months ago
Only the brain dead would believe anyone from Fox News. Fox News caters to mob mentality like the Roman Circus where victims are fed to the lions. Fox News is Fear News, they tell you what to fear and you become so confused you don't realize they contradict themselves, constantly.
Busmonks 8 months ago
@Busmonks AMEN!
MACKATTACK1970 8 months ago
We serve Israel without question
Coat & tie makes you more impressive on TV.
freetubester 8 months ago
We serve Israel without question
freetubester 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kevin Barrett is a total lying moron. Truthers are scum.
terrymanning1 8 months ago
@terrymanning1 - war is peace, ignorance is strength!
brainphreak 8 months ago
@brainphreak meaningless drivel mate. talk in english if you can
terrymanning1 8 months ago
@terrymanning1 - Sorry, those were quotes. I was under the impression you read the book since you said "truthers are scum" implying "liars are great!" which is much like "war is peace" or "black is white" haha. There is a book you should read called "1984" then you will not be confused by the very popular quotes I posted. You may quickly look up the term "newspeak" on wikipedia also to understand what your form of speech is classified under :)
brainphreak 8 months ago
@terrymanning1 - Oh sorry, I should have known. You are one of those extremists who has a 9/11 truther fetish. Nice background on your page, it was kinda funny. I know your type, searching out truther videos all day like porn just so you can get your rocks off posting repetitive and meaningless comments on videos :) I will not feed the trolls :)
brainphreak 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@terrymanning1 Only drivel mate for those who are too stupid to read a book.
MACKATTACK1970 8 months ago
Hannity is a douchebag and Colmes is just plain disgusting.
MACKATTACK1970 8 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@terrymanning1 And you're brain dead!
Busmonks 8 months ago
@terrymanning1
yea we are.. :-).
that is why you shouldn't of blown up, the twin towers,
we are going to get YOU.
charleskafka 7 months ago
Hannity getting completely owned as usual.
beedotgeedot 8 months ago
Hannity and colmes got owned. Fuck them and Bill orielly never a fair forum with them !!!!!puppets of the government they are!
peppperz91 9 months ago
how come If you dont believe the Official 9/11 Comission Report, you are not American. You should be shot for questioning the government. You are a nut. this sounds like sudam hussein shit. i just dont get it.
The fact is.. A lot of people dont believe/understand the official 9/11 comission report and they have questions. Yet, when they ask these questions...they are called conspiracy theorist. Its our right to ask questions. We are not obligated to except everythin the gov or tv says as truth
mickymacky02 9 months ago
I just don't understand how the "truthers" (on either side of the spectrum) can say that they are right and the other side is wrong. I have studied the 9/11 for a long time and have seen evidence on both sides, so the only conclusion I come to is "I don't know". However, I don't just easily accept information given to me by either side. Easily trusting 9/11 conspiracy theory videos, is just as bad as easily trusting government. Neither side has been able to convince me without doubt of the truth
follownicholas 9 months ago
KEvin Barrett is not a whistleblower. By definition a whistleblower needs to have first hand knowledge. Kevin Barrett has nothing but speculation, conjecture and fantasy.
Oz1976 9 months ago
WHY DO THEY CALL EVERYBODY CONSPIRACY NUTS THEY ARE NUTS IF THEY CHOOSE TO BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENTS STORY!!!!!!!
1mrslapzilla 9 months ago
No matter what you may think of the professor Kevin, he's right, 100% nailed it.
More and more americans are starting to see for themselves, we were conned, and Rumsfield, Chaney, and Wolfowitz, should be brought to justice.
paskettle 10 months ago
It's an established Communist tactic to destroy a culture through perpetuating lies & propaganda that go against important facts of a nation in order to build waves of doubt, manufactured dissent, and disbelief in the established legit authority. This not only weakens the nation, but also causes the establishment to waste time & resources either fighting or trying to correct these falsehoods. It also weakens their authority, and thus breeds a lack of allegiance amongst the populace.
NoGuff 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hannity is a Jew shill. What about all the Jew and communist professors that have been holding college students captive for the last 5 decades forcing them to regurgitate their liberal sh*t which you claim to be opposed to?
Kiss their a88es Hannity. Money. Money. Money.
DonDKitty 10 months ago
Hannity is a Jew shill. What about all the Jew and communist professors that have been holding college students captive for the last 5 decades forcing them to regurgitate their liberal sh*t which you claim to be opposed to?
Kiss their a88es Hannity. Money. Money. Money.
DonDKitty 10 months ago
Sean Hannity is the republicans bitch. He'll take it up the a**, deep throat it, swallow, you name it he'll do it.
uzi2004 11 months ago
I hate that Sean Hannity motherfucker. He was very rude to Kevin Barret and interrupted him and belittled him like the right wing GOP cocksucker that he is. I would love to catch that prick coming out of a bar and kick the fucking shit out of his cocky ass.
tittyj2020 11 months ago
911 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7
shackle5 11 months ago
Leave it to the Truthy cult to get their vital scientific and engineering info from a Muslim whackjob, whose degree is in ... are you ready? ... African history and folklore.
Still waiting for you clowns to find even one deranged engineer to publish an engineering paper proving your crackpot little theories.
Ten years, and this is the best you can do? How embarrassing.
MsgtSpook 11 months ago
@MsgtSpook it's really up to you believers to prove who did it and how beyond a shadow of a doubt as a court would require. A tape that looks like Morgan Freeman in a robe claiming responsibility wouldn't even be admissible in court because of the flaws and any lawyer would have pointed out several flaws to make a jury doubt it. There is no evidence to support the official US conspiracy in the 911 Report. I'm guessing you don't know enough about demolition to know a controlled one.
jw12yrsctch 11 months ago
this gentlemen is well spoken. thank you for saying "fox are the extremist" that made my day.
dase4321 11 months ago
Kevin you are great! The way that you finish your thoughts and sentences although they want to cut you off is incredible and inspiring! I love to watch those clips where you verbally kick their asses by telling the truth! Good job.
RummelsdorfLabs 1 year ago 5
It's not about being a kooky "conspiracy theorist;" it's about not automatically giving the benefit of the doubt to a government that has proven over and over, that they do not DESERVE the benefit of the doubt. Anyone who just automatically accepts what the powers-that-be tell us, ought to be ashamed of themselves. And watching this shit that passes for news, ought to make even the stupidest person aware of the fact that the media is complicit in governmental shenanigans.
LongLiveOx 1 year ago
Gulf Of Tonkin, Iraq War, Operation Northwoods, MK-ULTRA, Iran Contra, JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon, TWA 800, Pan-Am 103, and who knows what else? In ALL of those "incidents," the government LIED to it's people. WHY does ANYONE in this fucking country, trust one word that comes out of the government's pie hole?!
LongLiveOx 1 year ago 2
I FUCKING LOVE THIS PROFESSOR! Stuffing Hannity's blind propaganda! NICE!
awolf007 1 year ago
professor is 100% correct these bastards should not be on tv get air time, fukin bastard lying scum bags, sold out souls, notice how pig hanitty never looks @ camera when he says" you believe 911 was inside job" hahah you filthy scumbag hannity just like snake fag homles.
cetnik03 1 year ago
building 7.
xTheJeffShowx 1 year ago
911 truth, They Murdered period, i dont care how many politicians, rich family names or high ranking military have to swing by the neck till dead for this, 911 truth is the single best thing NOW for this world, just Imagine worldwide if ALL the elite criminals are kicked out of the positions of power, how human kind would bond as we would suddenly be made aware of all the chess games we have been apart of , yet we were Never asked to play the GAME, they brought terror into our lifes.
billsawakened 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 Was an inside job.
bmw200000 1 year ago
regurgitate is what these fox info-tainers ... tho not entertaining at all
regurgitate lol ..conspiracy ?? or the elephant in the room??
teddymarvelle 1 year ago
wow... lol fox's employment requisites must include a lower than room temp I.Q.
those poor prisoner students omfg fox ..crazy like a rupert murdoch lol
teddymarvelle 1 year ago
All I have to say is, look how scared Sean and Alan's faces become when truth is thrown right in their face.
Thycid 1 year ago
All I have to say is, look how scared Sean and Alan's faces become when truth is thrown right in their face.
Thycid 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kevin Barrett is a pathetic nutjob, who has reverted to interrupting public speakers in an infantile display of attention mongering. Why? Because no one else will listen to him. Even his beloved left wing thought leaders such as Chomsky and Amy Goodman pay no heed. He has become the laughing stock of the academic, political, and social standard bearers he so admires. He has the nerve to cite Morgan Reynolds? Who has turned into a bigger laughing stock than he has. RIP Barrett's reputation, alas.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 Kevin Barrett is a hero who has spoken the truth about 9/11. He shows great courage and great intelligence...have you looked into any of the 9/11 information? Obviously you can't face the truth. But rest assured it will come out. Rest assured.
jackiesglitter 1 year ago
Comment removed
bman342 1 year ago
@jackiesglitter Barrett wouldn't know 'truth' if it smacked him right between the eyes. For someone who professes critical thinking skills to posit that he "KNOWS 9/11 was an inside job" based upon flimsy evidence is not only disingenuous, but moronic. To suggest that 100 million people in the US agree 9/11 was an IJ, from a complete (intentional) misread of a NYTime survey, is spreading vile propaganda. And to suggest that every NYC cop/fireman was counting down WTC7 collapse is pure idiocy.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 - And dont you find it sad that you are even more pathetic than him? you have resorted to logging into youtube and searching for all 9/11 'truther' videos so you can comment negatively about how you hate 'truthers'... I always wonder about people like you.. If you hate "truthers", does this mean you love "liars"? I really dont get the whole idea of lumping together all different types of people with questions and calling them 'truthers' to ignore speaking about topics relating to truth?
brainphreak 1 year ago 18
@brainphreak ROFL, because you call yourselves truthers, or adherants to the 9/11 Truth "movement", that means you automatically have a monopoly on the Truth?? So if I called myself a millionaire I would automatically be one? That is typical of the idiotic logic displayed by so many truthers. And, yes, I dislike truthers as they represent a belief set that is anathema to me. Similar to how I feel about nazis, skinheads, anti-Semites, white supremists, and a host of other bigots. Sorry.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 - I do not call myself a truther, that I have never done. In fact I do not know anyone who does call themselves a "truther". The name was created by people like you who wish to classify people. Its funny that you do not condone bigotry and yourself say "I dislike truthers". Just to be sure you are aware of what a bigot is, I will follow this comment with the true definition. Its not uncommon, but you yourself claiming to condemn bigotry can scientifically be defined as a bigot.
brainphreak 1 year ago 5
@brainphreak Did I NOT say "or adherants to the 9/11 truth movement"? (it's just quicker to say 'truther'). This is another typical truther tactic: taking words/comments out of context, or playing semantical games as you did in an earlier post by suggesting the official story is also a conspiracy. Just like people who say that Semites are everyone from the middle-east therefore anti-Semite applies to arabs as well. Wrong. It's the commonly accepted meaning NOT the "technical" meaning.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 - Definition of Bigot: A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
This defines you. One who lumps every person with a differing belief into a category as "truthers" simply because they ask questions related to 911. You then find related videos on youtube , to condemn differing beliefs and show intolerance and animosity. You are defined a bigot.
brainphreak 1 year ago 3
@brainphreak Yadda yadda, you missed the point, again. Reread. In my post, I wasn't claiming to condemn bigotry, I was giving examples of the contempt I hold for people whose beliefs and tactics I find contemptible. I don't condemn those with different beliefs just those I find repugnant, and I mentioned some above. The "asking questions" thing is another myth of the truthers. Sheen says to the public he has questions, yet when addressing a truther conference was very clear in his accusations.
bman342 1 year ago
@brainphreak you tell him!
aiiiunluckykid 1 year ago
@bman342 you're just a troll
everyone can see thru you
defragen1 1 year ago
@defragen1 yes he is! ...and a stupid troll at that!
nicenonya3 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?
ctcole77 1 year ago
@bman342 you wouldn't know the truth if somebody shoved it up your ass,and probably can't rub two nickels together either!
nicenonya3 11 months ago
@nicenonya3 Interesting that in your twisted pathetic world that's how truth is determined. The only thing being shoved is your head into your ass. Impressive that you can still type.
bman342 11 months ago
@bman342 shut the fuck up, you are clearly an idiot
defragen1 1 year ago
@defragen1 No, dipshit, seems like you got the idiot crown all for yourself. Hail to the king.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 must be cry time?
faggot
defragen1 1 year ago
@defragen1 Putzbrain, do you have anything to say besides schoolyard insults? Though not surprising coming from a truthtard, c'mon you're making it way too easy for me, and too boring. Yawn.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 its funny how you attack mr. barrett instead of his claims...your pathetic
tha3immortals 1 year ago
@tha3immortals How about this? "Mr." Barrett's claims are more pathetic and idiotic than he is.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 65% of americans feel sorry for you
quinsedlethorpid 1 year ago
@quinsedlethorpid Am going to take a stab and assume that you think 65% of Americans believe in the "inside job" nonsense. If so, you're a certified idiot. Another truthrard bites the dust, LMFAO.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 well yea you moron I read the statistics, not to mention im reading these comments and you're obviously a minority here. can you please explain to me how WTC 7 collapsed? please? or why they wont release the pentagon footage?...
quinsedlethorpid 1 year ago
@quinsedlethorpid I'm a minority here? I'd also be a minority if I walked into an insane asylum. Don't mean to tax your brain, but see where I'm going with this? No. you tell ME what possible purpose was achieved by "demolishing" building 7? The world got the message with the destruction of the towers. What idiot planning this would think it makes sense to "demolish" another building 7-8 hrs after, and in so doing make it appear as CD? Read NIST report to understand the collapse of blg 7.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 I've read the "official" report and you still cant explain to me how WTC7 fell. go for it! have you ever heard of collecting insurance money?? because that's exactly what happened right after. the point is.. yes.. you are a minority here and your media brainwashed small mind is fortunately also a minority. look at the polls. I shouldn't have to argue FACTS
quinsedlethorpid 1 year ago
@quinsedlethorpid Oh lordy, so you actually believe that Larry Silverstein got on national TV and admitted that he demolished Blg 7. And I'M brainwashed? And you read all 10.000 of the NIST Report? That's beyond laughable. For the record, please cite ANY poll that has the majority of Americans believing that 9/11 was an Inside Job. Or that it was done for insurance. Won't hold my breath.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 DEMOLISHED use your eyes you can do this b a man
quinsedlethorpid 1 year ago
@quinsedlethorpid Hey misanthropid, that is the problem. All you guys do is use your eyes and not your brains. You'll condemn governments, both municipal, state, and federal, based upon "well it Looked like controlled demolition". Using "it looked like..." as proof, is why NO ONE (ie, worldwide legitimate media) believe you putzes. Buh-bye.
bman342 1 year ago
@bman342 How did bldg 7 fall?
jackiesglitter 11 months ago
@jackiesglitter In a downward motion.
bman342 11 months ago
Hannity is an asshole. I bet he hasn't even looked at the WTC 7 footage. He hasn't even asked why the pentagon won't release any of the 86 videos of a plane hitting the pentagon. There isn't one video showing a plane. What the hell is wrong with the "media". They are going out of business because they tell stories instead of actual news.
iamopinionated123 1 year ago