Can I just say that this video was made in jest? It was not a scientific debunking of Stan's evidence. There was clearly not enough information in his video to do a scientific debunking. This video was purely meant to make fun of a funny situation and point out that it wasn't remarkable evidence. If it hurts your sensibilities, move on.
alright. anywho, before this went into tangent land, all i was saying was i agree with you that stan romanek is laughable. i just find fault with your method of debunking him. that is less debunking, more making fun of. i just find that in poor taste. thats all. now really can we just leave it with that? it's so simple after all.
@th3k0w I hope my blanket comment that I just left cleared things up a bit. No debunking was actually being done. It was only a demonstration that nothing extraordinary or paranormal needs to take place to get the same result. Yes, my sense of humor can be crude. I have no intention of changing that. Sorry.
look, point is that i'm not your teacher. i'm not here to educate you case by case. i was simply stating that your method of "debunking" is less fact driven and more about looking better than the person who put forth the supposed evidence in the first place. i kinda find that to be in bad taste. especially when the feild of paranormal research isn't taken seriously because of these kinds of tactics. how you have equated it with all of this is beyond me.
@th3k0w Oh, you come onto my channel and start telling me how to do things and now you say you're not my teacher? Yes, you are a coward. If you don't like my methods, use your little mouse to navigate the fuck away from my channel. You are a short sighted know-it-all and I am not the least bit swayed by any of your arguments. Until you can stop hiding, act like a man, and meet me on equal ground where we can talk, I have no use for you.
o.0 but... he DID follow through with his theory. he DID create a device. did it work? no. is that a typical result using the scientific method. yes. seriously. i'm gonna start calling you glenn beck. listen. the scientific method begins with an unkown. a paranormal occurance. and with trial and reasoning, seaks to explain said occurance. thats 4th grade science right thar.
@th3k0w Wow, the Thomas Edison museum has no record of this follow through... Interesting.
You are arguing a completely different point than the one you started. Having a thought doesn't advance science until it is followed through, tested, and verified. That's third grade stuff right there... Grow a pair and come on my radio show to school me without you hiding behind a screen name and keyboard.
"If our personality survives, then it is strictly logical or scientific to assume it retains memory, intellect, other faculties and knowledge we acquire on Earth.Therefore...if we can evolve an instrument so delicate as to be affected by our personality as it survives in the next life, such an instrument, when made available, ought to record something."~Thomas Alva Edison
@th3k0w Oh, would you like me to quote completely contradictory things Edison said as well? This is your basis for saying that he "dabbled" in making a device to talk to the dead? Your research is incomplete.
@th3k0w May I also ask how this statement furthered science? He was waxing! Science never "assumes", it tests! Assuming or making a hypothesis is a very early step in the scientific method and only going to that step is NOT advancing anything.
oh and linticular aircraft design was brought about by intrest in ufo's. evp's have inspired research into radio interference. heck, even thomas edison felt strongly enough about an afterlife to dabble in making a device to talk to the dead with. but of course, what does he know about science. are you about done now? really i'd rather this not continue. i get tired of arguing with trolls...
@th3k0w Well, jackass, I guess that shows what you know about both "hate mongering" and paranormal researchers. You are accusing me of hate monger simply from a joke? From defending myself from your bitching and then you call me a troll? Fuck off with your double standard pal. On top of that, your info on Thomas Edison is completely off base. None of your examples talk about paranormal researchers. Why don't you stop hiding behind a screen name and come out for a real conversation?
oh i dunno. to site an example of your "hate mongering" i'd have to point out the video and pretty much every comment you have made to me. as for furthering science, well alot of science into electromagnetic fields has been a byproduct of research into paranormal phenomena. i'd also like to point out that this video is a PUBLIC attack, so you should have expected some criticsism. word homie.
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
@th3k0w Oh gee, did I say that the attacks were on this site? Surprise, but I also live in the real world as well.
If you want to give someone constructive criticism without starting a war, try sending an email. All you have done is get on your high horse while remaining anonymous. Don't bitch at me on a public forum and then criticize my attitude. Oh, and can you show me where I "hate mongered?" Can you also show me where someone in the paranormal community has furthered science?
i saw the original video before yours. i saw no attack on you or the community. was it kinda laughable? well, yes. his hand moves everytime it goes off. but i think the community of paranormal researchers as a whole tend to not attack people in a slanderous way. thats not furthering the science of the matter. thats childish. debunk him with facts. maybe you'll get a few more views that way. otherwise you're just posting to trolls.
@th3k0w I have endured far more attacks from the "community of paranormal researchers" than I ever levied. Fuck off with your holier than thou attitude. If you can't take a joke, move the fuck on and get out of my face.
while i like the fact that you "sort of present" another side to this instance, it really lacks professionalism. i would rather you show how it was done, what to look for, and present your arguments, rather than just mock people unprovoked. seems kinda petty to me. not so much a fan of you as a person now. still thanks for the counterpoint to stans video.
@th3k0w Can't say that we care if you think it was professional or not. It was done in jest and no money was made so the word "professional", to me, doesn't apply. If you saw the original video that was being mocked, I don't think you could say that it was unprovoked. One of the main points here is that they want to be taken seriously and shit like this begs to be mocked. We are in a paranormal community that has no real basis in reality and you are worried about what again?
I have never imagined that you held any affection for Stan, and was very surprised to know that you knew Lisa, she never mentioned it to me, I haven't talked to her in awhile. interesting development. Who am I going to be mean to now? Oh never mind, now that I am on Youtube, I have found a lot of idiots that like to fight.
Hey, what is going on, Lisa wont talk to me right now, something about not being able to trust anyone. Do you know what happened to make her so upset? I don't think I did anything, but she is not talking to me right now. I left her a message yesterday, but she has not gotten back to me yet. I apologized for whatever I may have done, I think she is worried that you and I are becoming friends and that I have betrayed her trust somehow. I hope she is not upset by our previous conversations.
Unfortunately, the threats were anonymous but meant to defend Stan. They were against our and our loved ones lives. We didn't take them too seriously...
We don't hate Stan. I think Stan is a pretty nice guy, actually.
I have never heard about ab=ny thing like that, and I am sure Stan and Lisa would have said something if they were aware of it as well. I apologize for the hatefulness that some people are capable of, and as I am sure you are aware, now that Stan's name is out there and yours as well, the nuts tend to come out and do crazy things.I will ask Lisa if she has knowledge of such threats being made against you and your families. She hates liars more than anything. I will ask her is she knows about it.
What's idiotic is that Stan and Rick put out crap like this to "prove" that there are aliens that think Stan is important enough to torment with no purpose...
When we show how "not-magical" it is, it suddenly becomes our fault?
Just so you know I laughed my ass off, I can't say it was not entertaining. I never said it was your fault, I was simply having fun at your expense as you were at Rick and Stan's.
It is like being in grade school again, the bullies against the already shunned kid. You can dish it out but you can't take it, that is what is the funniest part of this.
What camp would that be, the beleievers camp? Who has threatened you, or do you refer to my willingness to pay for a lawyer last year if the Romanek's chose to sue you? Hillarious, seems to me that threat was not such a threat. I am glad however to see that the obsession has lessened, and your site, looks a bit more restrained now.
If you want to discredit Romaneck, don't get an Alien to hold the EMF
NewWaysMusic 2 months ago
LOL!!!! Thhhhank you. Wonderful.
idris09 4 months ago
Can I just say that this video was made in jest? It was not a scientific debunking of Stan's evidence. There was clearly not enough information in his video to do a scientific debunking. This video was purely meant to make fun of a funny situation and point out that it wasn't remarkable evidence. If it hurts your sensibilities, move on.
Warningradio 1 year ago
alright. anywho, before this went into tangent land, all i was saying was i agree with you that stan romanek is laughable. i just find fault with your method of debunking him. that is less debunking, more making fun of. i just find that in poor taste. thats all. now really can we just leave it with that? it's so simple after all.
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w I hope my blanket comment that I just left cleared things up a bit. No debunking was actually being done. It was only a demonstration that nothing extraordinary or paranormal needs to take place to get the same result. Yes, my sense of humor can be crude. I have no intention of changing that. Sorry.
Warningradio 1 year ago
look, point is that i'm not your teacher. i'm not here to educate you case by case. i was simply stating that your method of "debunking" is less fact driven and more about looking better than the person who put forth the supposed evidence in the first place. i kinda find that to be in bad taste. especially when the feild of paranormal research isn't taken seriously because of these kinds of tactics. how you have equated it with all of this is beyond me.
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w Oh, you come onto my channel and start telling me how to do things and now you say you're not my teacher? Yes, you are a coward. If you don't like my methods, use your little mouse to navigate the fuck away from my channel. You are a short sighted know-it-all and I am not the least bit swayed by any of your arguments. Until you can stop hiding, act like a man, and meet me on equal ground where we can talk, I have no use for you.
Warningradio 1 year ago
o.0 but... he DID follow through with his theory. he DID create a device. did it work? no. is that a typical result using the scientific method. yes. seriously. i'm gonna start calling you glenn beck. listen. the scientific method begins with an unkown. a paranormal occurance. and with trial and reasoning, seaks to explain said occurance. thats 4th grade science right thar.
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w Wow, the Thomas Edison museum has no record of this follow through... Interesting.
You are arguing a completely different point than the one you started. Having a thought doesn't advance science until it is followed through, tested, and verified. That's third grade stuff right there... Grow a pair and come on my radio show to school me without you hiding behind a screen name and keyboard.
Warningradio 1 year ago
"If our personality survives, then it is strictly logical or scientific to assume it retains memory, intellect, other faculties and knowledge we acquire on Earth.Therefore...if we can evolve an instrument so delicate as to be affected by our personality as it survives in the next life, such an instrument, when made available, ought to record something."~Thomas Alva Edison
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w Oh, would you like me to quote completely contradictory things Edison said as well? This is your basis for saying that he "dabbled" in making a device to talk to the dead? Your research is incomplete.
Warningradio 1 year ago
@th3k0w May I also ask how this statement furthered science? He was waxing! Science never "assumes", it tests! Assuming or making a hypothesis is a very early step in the scientific method and only going to that step is NOT advancing anything.
Warningradio 1 year ago
oh and linticular aircraft design was brought about by intrest in ufo's. evp's have inspired research into radio interference. heck, even thomas edison felt strongly enough about an afterlife to dabble in making a device to talk to the dead with. but of course, what does he know about science. are you about done now? really i'd rather this not continue. i get tired of arguing with trolls...
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w Well, jackass, I guess that shows what you know about both "hate mongering" and paranormal researchers. You are accusing me of hate monger simply from a joke? From defending myself from your bitching and then you call me a troll? Fuck off with your double standard pal. On top of that, your info on Thomas Edison is completely off base. None of your examples talk about paranormal researchers. Why don't you stop hiding behind a screen name and come out for a real conversation?
Warningradio 1 year ago
oh i dunno. to site an example of your "hate mongering" i'd have to point out the video and pretty much every comment you have made to me. as for furthering science, well alot of science into electromagnetic fields has been a byproduct of research into paranormal phenomena. i'd also like to point out that this video is a PUBLIC attack, so you should have expected some criticsism. word homie.
th3k0w 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
th3k0w 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
th3k0w 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
th3k0w 1 year ago
well with an attitude like that i can somewhat see why. sorry you feel "under attack" on a video hosting site. wasn't my intention to seem to add to it. just posting constructive critiscism... i'll let you go back to your hate mongering.
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w Oh gee, did I say that the attacks were on this site? Surprise, but I also live in the real world as well.
If you want to give someone constructive criticism without starting a war, try sending an email. All you have done is get on your high horse while remaining anonymous. Don't bitch at me on a public forum and then criticize my attitude. Oh, and can you show me where I "hate mongered?" Can you also show me where someone in the paranormal community has furthered science?
Warningradio 1 year ago
i saw the original video before yours. i saw no attack on you or the community. was it kinda laughable? well, yes. his hand moves everytime it goes off. but i think the community of paranormal researchers as a whole tend to not attack people in a slanderous way. thats not furthering the science of the matter. thats childish. debunk him with facts. maybe you'll get a few more views that way. otherwise you're just posting to trolls.
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w I have endured far more attacks from the "community of paranormal researchers" than I ever levied. Fuck off with your holier than thou attitude. If you can't take a joke, move the fuck on and get out of my face.
Warningradio 1 year ago
while i like the fact that you "sort of present" another side to this instance, it really lacks professionalism. i would rather you show how it was done, what to look for, and present your arguments, rather than just mock people unprovoked. seems kinda petty to me. not so much a fan of you as a person now. still thanks for the counterpoint to stans video.
th3k0w 1 year ago
@th3k0w Can't say that we care if you think it was professional or not. It was done in jest and no money was made so the word "professional", to me, doesn't apply. If you saw the original video that was being mocked, I don't think you could say that it was unprovoked. One of the main points here is that they want to be taken seriously and shit like this begs to be mocked. We are in a paranormal community that has no real basis in reality and you are worried about what again?
Warningradio 1 year ago
hahaha that was pretty funny, so is the real video.. real or not, i don't know!
justanotherusername8 2 years ago
Okay that was funny !!!!!!!!
4thdensityreality 2 years ago
I have never imagined that you held any affection for Stan, and was very surprised to know that you knew Lisa, she never mentioned it to me, I haven't talked to her in awhile. interesting development. Who am I going to be mean to now? Oh never mind, now that I am on Youtube, I have found a lot of idiots that like to fight.
BethBelding 2 years ago
My relationship with Lisa is strictly via chatting on the web. Bryan has had dinner with her and Stan though. I honestly like them both.
Don't worry Beth, you can still be mean to me. Makes me feel like I have a girlfriend!
Warningradio 2 years ago
Hey, what is going on, Lisa wont talk to me right now, something about not being able to trust anyone. Do you know what happened to make her so upset? I don't think I did anything, but she is not talking to me right now. I left her a message yesterday, but she has not gotten back to me yet. I apologized for whatever I may have done, I think she is worried that you and I are becoming friends and that I have betrayed her trust somehow. I hope she is not upset by our previous conversations.
BethBelding 2 years ago
Unfortunately, the threats were anonymous but meant to defend Stan. They were against our and our loved ones lives. We didn't take them too seriously...
We don't hate Stan. I think Stan is a pretty nice guy, actually.
Warningradio 2 years ago
I have never heard about ab=ny thing like that, and I am sure Stan and Lisa would have said something if they were aware of it as well. I apologize for the hatefulness that some people are capable of, and as I am sure you are aware, now that Stan's name is out there and yours as well, the nuts tend to come out and do crazy things.I will ask Lisa if she has knowledge of such threats being made against you and your families. She hates liars more than anything. I will ask her is she knows about it.
BethBelding 2 years ago
Thanks, Beth.
Warningradio 2 years ago
Comment removed
BethBelding 2 years ago
Baxter and Bonner share panties...and say thank you... good lord you two. No wonder no one takes you seriously....IDIOTS!!
BethBelding 2 years ago
What's idiotic is that Stan and Rick put out crap like this to "prove" that there are aliens that think Stan is important enough to torment with no purpose...
When we show how "not-magical" it is, it suddenly becomes our fault?
Warningradio 2 years ago
Just so you know I laughed my ass off, I can't say it was not entertaining. I never said it was your fault, I was simply having fun at your expense as you were at Rick and Stan's.
It is like being in grade school again, the bullies against the already shunned kid. You can dish it out but you can't take it, that is what is the funniest part of this.
BethBelding 2 years ago
Yeah, we can't take it! We are also such bullies! I've never had so many threats come from your camp in my life! Hah! Those are hilarious too!
Warningradio 2 years ago
What camp would that be, the beleievers camp? Who has threatened you, or do you refer to my willingness to pay for a lawyer last year if the Romanek's chose to sue you? Hillarious, seems to me that threat was not such a threat. I am glad however to see that the obsession has lessened, and your site, looks a bit more restrained now.
BethBelding 2 years ago
Hahahahahaha,
typeanoise 3 years ago
grampa stole my panties!!! thank you
johnnieherb48 3 years ago
This is hilarious. thank you
mevdev 3 years ago
That was really funny.
soniquefus 3 years ago
HA! Anybody can do this trick, can't they? Let's get out the Ouija board!
binkle1 3 years ago