Evolved Atheist, you are a tool! Marriage (or wedlock) is a social union or legal contract between people that creates kinship. Never been called man and wife. Dumb ass!
To answer Russell's question, someone did make a formula to prove god. His name was Girdle, a friend of Einstein, and ended up starving himself to death. Just watch QI episode Greeks.
i love when uneducated people learn about logical fallacies, the ultra crash course, and then proceed to accuse people of them in all kinds of situations, often either mislabeling an argument as a fallacy at all, or assigning the wrong fallacy. the worst offender is the Ad Hominem, where anytime someone insults someone else there's always someone around talking about "Ad Hominems"
when i google - toilet paper ban - i get articles about banning the burqa in france. I'm not getting the right results. I assume these two aren't related?
the caller is a frickin' tool and a huge, big, liar. he got caught and he tried to lie through his teeth. he also tries to pass himself off as an atheist. no way I believe him.
The first caller's argument is probably the dumbest argument against gay marriage one could possibly make.
He shows a complete ignorance of etymology, how language works in general, as well as how it changes over time.
An equivalent argument would be me arguing the music known as rock cannot be called rock, because society has established over time that the word rock refers to a geological entity. The word rock has value to me so therefore referring to anything else as rock is wrong.
Through the methods that feminism used we know that words can be redefined. Actually, my mom is an atheist and she's against everything about gays. She says she's disgusted by them. I really don't understand why, because I never had this problem. I just don't see what is disgusting about it.
What kills me is that this guy self identifies as black in the next episode. So they can be "Shmarried" because it is equal to marriage, just "different."
What's this? Separate but equally? Plessy vs. Fergison?
Someone isn't aware of their black history and that separate but equal is INHERENTLY unequal.
i would want to get shmaried :D . its so ridiculous how word can get so much impact on thoughts. So hes ok with gays having same rights as straight people but he is so bothered by one word that he is ready to deny some rights just becouse of a word in the dictionary,how is it logical position?
And the funny thing is that he calls in yet again in the next episode with Matt, and he actually keeps this guy on about twice as long, even despite Jeff's request to just hang up on him as soon as he knew who it was. Unfortunately, this guy doesn't seem to learn and keeps spouting his same bullshit with his same methods. He simply wants to be known as the lone athiest opposed to gay marriage, but can never seem to defend his position outside a goddamn dictionary.
sigh... this is where Matt shines. He recognizes people like this within seconds, and doesn't let it progress this far (re: caller #1). This guy isn't saying anything, he's just running in circles repeating himself and avoiding the questions the hosts are asking.
You know what…If gay marriage is not called marriage, I cool with that. As long as Gays and Lesbians marriages are completely equal, in all rights. This definition games is pointless, why is it so important to define a word to mean X. Why not call it completeness.
Good ep. Charlie always amuses me. I get the feeling of a guy really wanting to cling to anything that may justify his issues with homosexuality. I could be wrong though.
As a litter observational note, could things have been anymore awkward between Russel and Martin at the end there?
Just a note. I live (and is) a Scandinavian (sweden even) , and here, religion (Theism) isnt that a big consern. Some are religious, most religious are secular, but in the resent years, Swedish politics have changed, and is heavily indoctrinated or bombarded by American Evangelist Valued Lobbies, and it have had an impact on some regions of my country, Sadly. And Theists have been more Loud the last 10 years, witch gives the impression that there is more "christians". US Exports these Ideas!
After thinking a bit ... i know that I spelled it Wrong ... its Marriage (sorry, english is not my native language). BUT ... this is just a thought. Shmarriage whould be what? Shit marriage? ... :) just kidding. Barriage should/could be "Bi-sexual marriage" or Garriage or Larriage (Gay-marriage or Lesbian-marriage)... Harriage could be "Homo-sexual marriage" ... Amarriage could be Animal-Man-Marriage ... and Rarriage could mean ... Robot Human Marriage ... (in the near future) ;)
I Could actually agree that "Marige" could mean "Man+ Woman" ... if its just Sementics ... and Smarige or Barige or Garige ... could mean that its a Marige with the same gender. Im not a Homo/bi-fobic ... just saying that ... if its Sementics ... then a word can be "descriptive" for gender (like Woman and Man, like IT is asexuall)
@Pompelipom33 "I wounder if the religious people would think it was okey if only white people could get married and not black people ... is that also okey ...?
Pompelipom33 1 month ago "
Well, before Loving v. Virginia in '67, many argued exactly that. As did the proponents of Apartheid. So yes, theists have an amazing ability to find a way to make their god agree with their views......
"In 1958, the Christian fundamentalist preacher Jerry Falwell, at the time a defender of segregation, in a sermon railed against integration, warning that it would lead to miscegenation, which would "destroy our [white] race eventually.".[26]"
In England we have 'civil partnerships' which are exactly the same as marriages in every way, including whether or not they can be legally refused a hotel room with a double bed.
It's mental to get hung up on the word marriage but if people care that much about the word then let them have it.
Let the baby have his dummy (that means pacifier btw for the non-English people)
i think that first caller was on crack or something,i mean when it came to the society deciding whats right and wrong part then he completely kind of forgot what he had just said
I don't understand why anyone would want to be an atheist. There is no 100% proof that God exist but there isn't 100% proof that he doesn't exist so why would you want to take the risk. If your a christian and God exist then you go to heaven, if he doesn't exist then nothing happens, but if your an atheist and God does exist then your going to hell so why risk it?
@lunchbox420wb First of all, belief has nothing to do with desire. Just because you want something to be true doesn't mean that it is true. Secondly, the person who makes the claim ALWAYS has the responsibility of providing proof. Since theists are the ones who claim that they believe in a God, it is not the atheists' responsibility to disprove that belief. It is the theists' responsibility to support their belief.
@lunchbox420wb Lastly, with regards to your "why risk it?" question: You are using an argument called pascal's wager. You're only considering 2 possibilities: (You are right and the atheists are wrong) OR (The atheists are right and you are wrong). However, those are NOT the only 2 possibilities. You fail to consider the possibility that you and the atheist are both wrong, and some other religion is right (in which case you and anyone who didn't follow the correct religion have... (continued)
@Periph1989 the same problems. ...Atheists are being honest about the situation, and realize that since the evidence for a God or Gods are not sufficient enough for them to believe , they don't believe.
By the way, in my own opinion, if the most likely possibility that there isn't a god or heaven is true, you DO lose something. You waste the only life that you have, and take it for granted. You work to get an afterlife that cheapens this life.
@Periph1989 I only need to use 2 possibilities because every religion other than christianity was created by illuminati/masons (lucifer worshipers) to purposely deceive people from the truth. In other words every religion is false. Talk to any TRUE christian and they will tell u christianity isnt a religion its a relationship with Jesus Christ. Do some research on the illuminati (powerful elite secret society) and u will see how they deceived many people about how true the Bible is.
@lunchbox420wb Wow. I can't tell if you're being serious, or just a poe. If you are serious, you are a pure example of how religions can poison minds. Christianity has polluted your brain, and has hindered your ability to think critically about what you believe, so you now accept crazy conspiracies. You need professional help.
@Periph1989 people that dont want to except the truth or hide the truth call it a conspiracy, people that know the truth call it facts. Have u ever looked at the back of the 1 dollar bill? it has illuminati/mason symbols all over it. Thats not a conspiracy u can look at it with ur own eyes but ur too scared to do some research because no atheist wants to get proved wrong. u say i need help but really its u that has been deceived to believe these lies
@lunchbox420wb LOLOLOL. You think pictures on a dollar is proof of an organization of people around the world who's goal is to control us?!?!.... Wow. You're worldview is so tainted that you'll probably believe anything. ...Sorry, but SANE people have standards with which we use to determine whether a claim is plausible or not. If you're going to make complete bat-sh*t crazy claims, like the ones you're spewing now, you're going to have to give extraordinary evidence. (continued)
@lunchbox420wb So you know that god exists, how do you know that as a fact? Obviously I don't believe in god myself, I have never seen any convincing evidence. And i don't know for 100% that god does not exist, but i reject the claims that he does, go ahead make your case, unless you are a scared theist.
Holy fuck dude... I've seen people on LSD whilst smoking w-pot that made more sense than you? DO you believe this stuff you are saying? You are taking this paracosm way to far, you need to get a PET-scan for brain damage.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I wouldnt be surprised if i have brain damage from taking hits of LSD and the pot i smoked but i know what im talking about and you-your just silly
You just said that you might have brain damage but you know what you are talking about. Perhaps you brain damage made you delusional. Thinking you are telling the truth doesn't mean you are actually telling the truth.
@lunchbox420wb - oh shucks. Guess what. If you don't believe in Odin and Thor, then you might not get to Valhalla. This is the oldest (and dumbest) arguments, most famously known as "Pascal's Wager" (google it). What if I don't believe in unicorns, and unicorns exist? You can make this same silly argument for any belief. Guess what? It doesn't hold water.
@47f0 then what does hold water? if you believe there is no God then tell me why. u must have some reasoning why u dont believe. is it because u cant see God? well thats a dumb reason for not believing. i cant see wind but i know its there. is it because u dont like being told what to do? maybe u had something bad happen to you and you cant understand why God would do that. there has to be a reason why u dont believe, dont just call something a lie because u dont want to believe it
@FlyByW1r3 What are u talking about? copy and paste? im simply having a conversation how am i claiming victory? Atheist have no brains and they think every non-atheist thinks the same. Silly atheist, tricks are for kids. haha
@lunchbox420wb "Atheist have no brains and they think every non-atheist thinks the same"
Well, there is one thing that all theists agree on(...non-atheist is a double negative btw), that: There is at least one God. That's what we disagree with, but not necessarily for the same reasons.
It seems more atheists are calling in just to chat in these past few episodes. It does not make for an interesting show, stop calling in and let the theists get their calls in, please.
@ClearlyJesus Actually, as one of the callers to the show(Alex from Muncy) I will tell you now that the call screeners do a good job of, if there is a lack of theists calling, informing you, "We would like to get more theist callers this episode, call back another time? Thanks. Bye."
Actually, I don't agree with the opinions of the first caller at all but I think he is making allot more sense than they are accrediting him with. A little bit of bias I'd say.
Yea, that guy should never be allowed to call in again. He seems insane. Like his mind can't handle being atheist- I bet he turns back to theism at some point.
@Jeffersonwazright I think he is a evangelical Christian pretending to be an atheist. When questioned he has no reason for his anti-gay views and "the bible says so" seems on the tip of his tongue to fill the gap. Without it he is just left hanging.
On the other hand he might just be an irrational dingbat who likes to think he has a rational basis for his opinions when he does not. Someone who confuses their subjective opinion with objective facts.
@Jeffersonwazright I watched shows 713 and 714 since that comment and the irrational dingbat hypothesis is making more and more sense. He seems to be trying to justify his prejudices with semantics and word-play but avoiding establishing a reason.
@ristinraccoon Exactly. Just the same, I'm not sure humans need a reason to be a homophobe. I don't know if he knows he needs a reason to be a homophobe. Homophobia is natural, not metaphysical. The rational "man" is starting to reason itself out of bigotry. This atheist is not rational but an animal who is trying to think.
@ciaochowbella I disagree. DNA is in control. DNA forces male humans to mate with superior DNA and it also knows the threat of homosexuality as a game ender.
Animals dont really hate in general. You cant point to animals and say "see". We are like gods compared to any other animals and not comparable.
@Jeffersonwazright Your ideas about DNA wrong, but it's completely irrelevant. Many species of animals DO engage in homosexual acts for the sheer pleasure of them. This has obviously not prevented them from reproducing.
In some cases, we can use animals to refute arguments, especially if the natural behavior of animals is held up as the example. We are not "like gods" compared to other animals. That's your skewed perspective holding humanity up as special saying that.
@ciaochowbella You can’t prove my ideas about DNA are wrong. You should check out Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene sometime- it’s pretty compelling. We ARE like gods compared to animals. No other animals is within 300,000 years of space travel-give or take. But many of us do act like animals so your argument has merit. I will close with this: I have observed homophobia outside of religion...ITS IS NATURAL. No matter how much you don't want it to be.
@Jeffersonwazright You misunderstand genetics. You said that DNA "knows". It doesn't. We are not "like gods" compared to animals except in our minds. I'm pretty sure most animals think we're destructive twats. Your holding up human intellect as some goal when it's just the niche we filled.
Just because you've observed homophobia outside religion doesn't make it natural. If other animals commit homosexual acts yet don't exhibit homophobia, you cannot conclude it's natural. It's social.
@ciaochowbella Search the video "racism is innate", watch the video, and then try and understand that homophobia is no different than racism. It is a fear of the unknown.
I'm pretty sure that most animals just think we are the most feared animal and can't think on a "destructive twat" level. I think you went a little Avatar there on me. Step away from the spiritual realm.
You also don't seem to understand that animals have been dealing with humans as a destructive species for so long that they DO instinctively avoid us for just that reason. However, they don't avoid homosexuals or homosexuality.
You're not very congnizant of how nature works, are you?
@ciaochowbella There was a story in Scientific American recently about how racism may be innate. One of them was a study on babies and they proved that babies took notice of other races and understood that the other race was different. Another study was one on adults and they proved that adults have less empathy for another race- some seemingly non racist people had no empathy whatsoever for another race but plenty for their own. I will admit that society makes this innate concern worse.
@Jeffersonwazright Idiotic argument. Of COURSE a white baby will notice a black baby as "different", because he's BLACK! And of COUSE the adult will be less "empathic", speccially in America where people is raised to be racist. Such stupidity.
@LesPaul2006 Nope. You are one of those dumbass arrogant people who speak before doing the research and/or think about it. Seemingly non racist people had little to no empathy for another race. People who were completely rational and liberal had less respect for a black person. America as in North, Central or South? Or all? Which America are you talking about?
@ciaochowbella I just realized I was talking to a woman. Now I understand the debate. You telling me homophobia is not innate is like me telling you that a monthly period is nothing to get emotional about. We simply will not see eye to eye on this subject.
Also, I rode my bicycle past dogs, ducks, geese, cats, birds, cows, and a llama this week and they did not seem to think I was too terrible. I think my cognition is ok. We avoid wild animals just like they avoid us. Its natural to avoid.
Do not drag my gender into this. It has nothing to do with it.
It's obvious from your comments that you do not understand DNA or how natural selection works. It is also glaringly apparent that you're unable to differentiate socially imposed behavior from natural inclination. You just want to claim that homophobia is natural to justify your own feelings.
If homophobia is natural, why is homosexual behavior condoned in many societies?
Yes it does. Men and women are almost a different species when it comes to the way they "feel" about things.
OK, sure, why not. I feel homophobia towards gay men. Whats the problem. I am an atheist, I understand that gay men probably cannot harm me in any way, I support gay marriage, I wish gay men no ill will, yet there is a feeling of contempt that I have that I can't explain- other than it being natural.
Because humans are rational. See comments above for more on this.
@Jeffersonwazright No, my gender has nothing to do with this subject. The fact you believe it does only illustrates your misogyny further. I'm not "feeling" about this subject. I'm drawing from fact.
The contempt you feel for gay men is directly related to the contempt you feel for women. Misogyny and homophobia are directly related and are BOTH social teachings and not natural inclinations.
If we look at your comments for rationality, we'd be on barren ground.
@Jeffersonwazright "Men and women are almost a different species when it comes to the way they "feel" about things."
Maybe you should consult a dictionary on the commonly understood definitions of words like 'species', because you seem to be coming up with your own as you go along.....
another one i like regarding big numbers, if you take a glass of water, and calculate the odds that a single hydrogen atom is there in front of you, you'll find its almost impossible that there is a glass of water in front of you. yet there it is.
If this "gay basher" is reading, let me tell you to put your questions very logically and precisely, otherwise please go to school and learn to speak plainly and wisely, Mr. Confused-Mind
marriage is a social institution, and a necessary one, so as to keep parents united, reduce infidelities, and raise children, the future pioneers of civilization in a stable and institutionalized environment.
@AyeSkyeTech "marriage is a social institution, and a necessary one, so as to keep parents united, reduce infidelities, and raise children, the future pioneers of civilization in a stable and institutionalized environment"
How's that workin' so far?
I've been with my wife for 35 years and have raised 3 children. We didn't get married until child # 3 10 years ago. Marriage is not required to do any of the things you posted.
To them,''they say''we came from apes...The atheists are irrational creatures, animals, the brain makes more sense than even the atheist's brain.
Fuck all unbelievers: Christianity - Judaism - atheists - satanists - sexual deviant people - buddhism.Fuck all atheists! An Atheist is the brain of a monkey's brain.Now it was full.
@whanethewhip Her mother had not been a bitch, now you'd be a believer.You come from the descendants of adultery.Their mothers and fathers before marriage and got married, you are coming to the world.Your regard to the latter a complete disappointment.But you do not have the brain to understand it.You have no honor.You will experience the world as a bastard.Do you know that you are now.
@SuperGeniusLife I have no honor? You have no brain. You are the one on YT making up shit about people you don't know. I wish you had the balls to say this shit to my face... just you and me. :) But you are a coward hiding behind your keyboard talking shit. Hello keyboard warrior, I'm sorry you are a pussy and YT is all you have. Don't you have a pig to fuck or something?
Good point about why wouldn't an atheist leave such a strongly religious country. I've thought about leaving myself, trust me. And France sounds like a great place to go to considering majority of the social norms there sound better compared to those of USA.
When it comes to languages, word definitions can change over time. Look at the word gay. It once meant happy, but slowly switched over to mean homosexual. That was a cultural change. Then you have scientific definition changes like what happened with the term "planet" recently. Words, whether they be cultural, scientific, or legal, can change and do change over time. This may very well happen with the word "marriage".
@OPE08 so i say john won the lottery yesterday.. you believe him, i don't.
so your statement how can you disbelieve in something that doesn't exist. you simply don't. your trying to change the definition of atheism, not gonna work.
@OPE08 as a small child we dont believe in the supernatural.. correct. as a small child i don't believe in electricity either.. until evidence is presented to me and thus i believe. some people choose to believe in things without evidence. god religon, believin that a person is telling the truth about something with god. i just choose not to believe in god. the other person does believe in god. so i lack a belief in god. as opposed to other person.
@OPE08 your being ridiculous.. belief and existence are two different things.. sorry flyingspaghettimoner is right. i can BELIEVE anything. i can believe im going to fly if i jump off a bridge. i can believe in fairies.. belief has nothing to do with existence.. it doesnt have to be prove to exist 1st to disbelieve. how can you disbelieve something doesnt exist. easy . you just dont beleive.
ive watched some of your shows & its funny to see that though youve made good points disproving the religious view of a personified, rule based God..they havent disproved God. im not of religion, just spiritual but since their all about facts & science..heres some..energy can neither be created nor destroyed, its eternal, everything is made of energy, including intellegent thoughts, so it has been intellegent way before we were able to utilize it, God is potential energy, the world is kenitic
Please don't take calls from that EvolvedAtheist guy anymore. It's such a waste of time. All he does is spew out the same arguments in the same call over and over. It might be fun to debate him but probably bores your viewers, or at least it does this one. Still, great show.
@paradigm71 -- I know, eh?... it's a pity that his call was taken for episode #713 as well. I think by now that we are all familiar with the narrow-minded, homophobic one-track bigotry this asshat brings to the table.
To paraphrase his own copy-and-paste manifesto (which you receive if he selects you during his trolls of individuals commenting on his nonsense in these channels), science will eventually prove he is harmful as it does for all things we find disgusting, ie. the opinions of EA.
I disagree that the word "Marriage" would imply a commitment between man and a woman. However, I realize why the church won't/can't bless gay marriages as it goes against their dogma. So could I demand that the church would bless gay marriages...well, not really. Regardless even I think the idea of god and religions is utter bullshit...
I have a feeling this guy is very insecure about his sexuality: his whole argument of the word marraige is between hetros. Presumably he is an hetro. But marraige is a personal thing between 2 people, so if he was married himself what has anyone else got to do with it? The success or failure of the marraige depends on him. But he is afraid of his responsibility for the strength of his relationshiip. So makes him try to contrive an outside cause. He really is homophobic.
@jofx1992 He's black therefore he's ignorant. Considering that im a darker complexion means im less intelligent that you is your sense of logic. Sorry my friend but that is an ignorant comparison. He is a dumb ass though lol
...what the hell is wrong with this guy?! It's been a while since I've heard a theist caller this bad.
IoEstasCedonta 1 day ago
Evolved Atheist, you are a tool! Marriage (or wedlock) is a social union or legal contract between people that creates kinship. Never been called man and wife. Dumb ass!
latebuslewy 2 weeks ago
To answer Russell's question, someone did make a formula to prove god. His name was Girdle, a friend of Einstein, and ended up starving himself to death. Just watch QI episode Greeks.
Russell192Talks 1 month ago
@Russell192Talks Because Telly always tells the truth.
RamoneHoffman 1 month ago
Red herring strawman fallacy. Your argument is invalid.
42underscored 2 months ago
i love when uneducated people learn about logical fallacies, the ultra crash course, and then proceed to accuse people of them in all kinds of situations, often either mislabeling an argument as a fallacy at all, or assigning the wrong fallacy. the worst offender is the Ad Hominem, where anytime someone insults someone else there's always someone around talking about "Ad Hominems"
BillKiernan 2 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
@BillKiernan The first caller was throwing out buzz words he's heard withing actual debates.
MonTag666 1 month ago
Yayy vienna, austria.
ArsonistInUrFirewall 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAtheistExperience
this 1st caller is getting on my nerves
me25422 3 months ago
I love how Russell always has his smirk on.
OOOPwnedOOO 3 months ago 8
If we do invent Schmarriage, will straight couples be able to get Schmarried?
tph2010 3 months ago
Comment removed
tph2010 3 months ago
lol i love the black "atheist"
tph2010 3 months ago
first caller argument got destroyed in like a minute after he stopped talking the first time, the rest was just stupid gum flapping
symnzXx 3 months ago
when i google - toilet paper ban - i get articles about banning the burqa in france. I'm not getting the right results. I assume these two aren't related?
theVIIStar 3 months ago
"Schmarriage, garrage or parriage..."
The most anal-retentive guy in Compton with internet access.
ofSaturday 3 months ago 4
the caller is a frickin' tool and a huge, big, liar. he got caught and he tried to lie through his teeth. he also tries to pass himself off as an atheist. no way I believe him.
freeurmind2 3 months ago in playlist Gnu Atheists
He's going to 'root ' for gays lolz
gillyssquashball 4 months ago
this guy needs his tongue cut out...
itzahazylife 4 months ago
Schmarriage lmao!!!
MrStearley87 4 months ago
the first caller what was his screen name the UN-Evovled Atheist
silverhike11 4 months ago in playlist Gnu Atheists
Yay @ the Emo Philips reference!
PirateOfTheInternet 4 months ago
The first caller's argument is probably the dumbest argument against gay marriage one could possibly make.
He shows a complete ignorance of etymology, how language works in general, as well as how it changes over time.
An equivalent argument would be me arguing the music known as rock cannot be called rock, because society has established over time that the word rock refers to a geological entity. The word rock has value to me so therefore referring to anything else as rock is wrong.
corbitwilson 4 months ago
Comment removed
corbitwilson 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
laws of physics dont prove god u fools if anything it disproves the all powerful god
FIGHTFANNERD3 4 months ago
31;39 the religious guy gets owned but stil tries to comeback back with his crap logic and fails
FIGHTFANNERD3 4 months ago
Comment removed
FIGHTFANNERD3 4 months ago
Comment removed
FIGHTFANNERD3 4 months ago
Through the methods that feminism used we know that words can be redefined. Actually, my mom is an atheist and she's against everything about gays. She says she's disgusted by them. I really don't understand why, because I never had this problem. I just don't see what is disgusting about it.
zeldaofarel 4 months ago in playlist More videos from TheAtheistExperience
@zeldaofarel feminism is stupid fact
FIGHTFANNERD3 4 months ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 You have no clue what feminism actually is.
zeldaofarel 4 months ago
Also, Leo's intelligence and accent are hot as hell. I'd shmarry him. I'd even shmate with him preshmaritally.
EmilyDNelson 4 months ago
What kills me is that this guy self identifies as black in the next episode. So they can be "Shmarried" because it is equal to marriage, just "different."
What's this? Separate but equally? Plessy vs. Fergison?
Someone isn't aware of their black history and that separate but equal is INHERENTLY unequal.
I really hate that fucker.
EmilyDNelson 4 months ago
i would want to get shmaried :D . its so ridiculous how word can get so much impact on thoughts. So hes ok with gays having same rights as straight people but he is so bothered by one word that he is ready to deny some rights just becouse of a word in the dictionary,how is it logical position?
TheGenesisarcanum 5 months ago in playlist Daugiau TheAtheistExperience vaizdo įrašų
20:30 What a deductive argument...
Premise 1 : It's either A, B or C.
Premise 2 : It's not A nor B.
Conclusion : Therefore, it's C.
LOL
Quartrez 5 months ago
Comment removed
Quartrez 5 months ago
Comment removed
Quartrez 5 months ago
What a fucking idiot! Gahhh! I can't stand it!
Dedrea89 5 months ago
FALLACY!
mornmeril 6 months ago
That 1st guy, he's showing so much hate for gays, it almost screams in our faces, "I'm gay and I hate that"...
Acrimonator 6 months ago
And the funny thing is that he calls in yet again in the next episode with Matt, and he actually keeps this guy on about twice as long, even despite Jeff's request to just hang up on him as soon as he knew who it was. Unfortunately, this guy doesn't seem to learn and keeps spouting his same bullshit with his same methods. He simply wants to be known as the lone athiest opposed to gay marriage, but can never seem to defend his position outside a goddamn dictionary.
multitudeofidols 6 months ago
sigh... this is where Matt shines. He recognizes people like this within seconds, and doesn't let it progress this far (re: caller #1). This guy isn't saying anything, he's just running in circles repeating himself and avoiding the questions the hosts are asking.
Dethblight 6 months ago
7:16 Facepalm LOL
zweiosterei 6 months ago
fuck that first guy i dont even understand why you would keep him on the phone
m0jeezy13 6 months ago
this show makes me a better atheist
nickthegrizzly2 7 months ago 18
@nickthegrizzly2 this show makes me a better HUMAN.
xipheonj 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheAtheistExperience
@xipheonj lol do some acid and you will go down the rabbit hole.
nickthegrizzly2 1 month ago
You know what…If gay marriage is not called marriage, I cool with that. As long as Gays and Lesbians marriages are completely equal, in all rights. This definition games is pointless, why is it so important to define a word to mean X. Why not call it completeness.
TehraniTX 7 months ago
Good ep. Charlie always amuses me. I get the feeling of a guy really wanting to cling to anything that may justify his issues with homosexuality. I could be wrong though.
As a litter observational note, could things have been anymore awkward between Russel and Martin at the end there?
naejeilie 7 months ago
"marriage" equals fucking" marriage" period!...... fucking homofobs!
stress4rmbk 7 months ago
Just a note. I live (and is) a Scandinavian (sweden even) , and here, religion (Theism) isnt that a big consern. Some are religious, most religious are secular, but in the resent years, Swedish politics have changed, and is heavily indoctrinated or bombarded by American Evangelist Valued Lobbies, and it have had an impact on some regions of my country, Sadly. And Theists have been more Loud the last 10 years, witch gives the impression that there is more "christians". US Exports these Ideas!
jadeLoTuZ 7 months ago
After thinking a bit ... i know that I spelled it Wrong ... its Marriage (sorry, english is not my native language). BUT ... this is just a thought. Shmarriage whould be what? Shit marriage? ... :) just kidding. Barriage should/could be "Bi-sexual marriage" or Garriage or Larriage (Gay-marriage or Lesbian-marriage)... Harriage could be "Homo-sexual marriage" ... Amarriage could be Animal-Man-Marriage ... and Rarriage could mean ... Robot Human Marriage ... (in the near future) ;)
Just a thought
jadeLoTuZ 7 months ago
I Could actually agree that "Marige" could mean "Man+ Woman" ... if its just Sementics ... and Smarige or Barige or Garige ... could mean that its a Marige with the same gender. Im not a Homo/bi-fobic ... just saying that ... if its Sementics ... then a word can be "descriptive" for gender (like Woman and Man, like IT is asexuall)
jadeLoTuZ 7 months ago
Im pro Polyamore (Poligamy) also ... If all is informed about it though.
jadeLoTuZ 7 months ago
Shmarried. LOL. What a knob. Like dude, if you don't care that they can get a union, why does it matter what it's called. LOL.
fifimsp 7 months ago
So this guy hates gays.. why can't he just admit that and stop bugging everyone?
aegisgfx 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pompelipom33 "I wounder if the religious people would think it was okey if only white people could get married and not black people ... is that also okey ...?
Pompelipom33 1 month ago "
Well, before Loving v. Virginia in '67, many argued exactly that. As did the proponents of Apartheid. So yes, theists have an amazing ability to find a way to make their god agree with their views......
moopism 7 months ago
@moopism Here ya go- from wikipedia:
"In 1958, the Christian fundamentalist preacher Jerry Falwell, at the time a defender of segregation, in a sermon railed against integration, warning that it would lead to miscegenation, which would "destroy our [white] race eventually.".[26]"
moopism 7 months ago
In England we have 'civil partnerships' which are exactly the same as marriages in every way, including whether or not they can be legally refused a hotel room with a double bed.
It's mental to get hung up on the word marriage but if people care that much about the word then let them have it.
Let the baby have his dummy (that means pacifier btw for the non-English people)
TheOmegajuice 7 months ago
Poor guy just doesn't know what to do with the word "fallacy".
ThirdRAILKink 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who would have thought a little public access show in Texas would have a worldwide audience? It's fucking fantastic!! *says an English atheist!!*
19822andy 7 months ago
Wow. Evolved atheist really needs his phone line cut... Maybe without the phone, he'll get so bored he'll PICK UP A FUCKING BOOK
JokerzKard 7 months ago
Blithering idiot.
Wallyrus 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I dont want to be blocked from this channel
witch26071 7 months ago
i think that first caller was on crack or something,i mean when it came to the society deciding whats right and wrong part then he completely kind of forgot what he had just said
ILoveRavenc 7 months ago
Does that first tool even know what a strawman is?
drpeppa2357 7 months ago
Is the first caller an Idiot? Or just so arrogant that he can't see how much of idiot he is?
angryshoes1986 7 months ago 10
@angryshoes1986 .... probably both, an arrogant idiot
KamasutraButterfly 7 months ago
@angryshoes1986
The two arent mutually exclusive, he can be both an idiot and too arrogant to realize it at the same time.
matszz 5 months ago
I don't understand why anyone would want to be an atheist. There is no 100% proof that God exist but there isn't 100% proof that he doesn't exist so why would you want to take the risk. If your a christian and God exist then you go to heaven, if he doesn't exist then nothing happens, but if your an atheist and God does exist then your going to hell so why risk it?
lunchbox420wb 8 months ago
@lunchbox420wb
Because we're not gullible and scared
oneznzeroz 8 months ago
@oneznzeroz u will be scared when u feel Gods wrath upon ur ass
lunchbox420wb 8 months ago
@lunchbox420wb
I didn't know god was kinky like that. I don't roll like that though I like ladies.
oneznzeroz 8 months ago
@oneznzeroz u must not know what a metaphor is. no wonder why ur prolly an atheist because of how ignorant u are
lunchbox420wb 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb First of all, belief has nothing to do with desire. Just because you want something to be true doesn't mean that it is true. Secondly, the person who makes the claim ALWAYS has the responsibility of providing proof. Since theists are the ones who claim that they believe in a God, it is not the atheists' responsibility to disprove that belief. It is the theists' responsibility to support their belief.
(continued).
Periph1989 8 months ago
@lunchbox420wb Lastly, with regards to your "why risk it?" question: You are using an argument called pascal's wager. You're only considering 2 possibilities: (You are right and the atheists are wrong) OR (The atheists are right and you are wrong). However, those are NOT the only 2 possibilities. You fail to consider the possibility that you and the atheist are both wrong, and some other religion is right (in which case you and anyone who didn't follow the correct religion have... (continued)
Periph1989 8 months ago
@Periph1989 the same problems. ...Atheists are being honest about the situation, and realize that since the evidence for a God or Gods are not sufficient enough for them to believe , they don't believe.
By the way, in my own opinion, if the most likely possibility that there isn't a god or heaven is true, you DO lose something. You waste the only life that you have, and take it for granted. You work to get an afterlife that cheapens this life.
Periph1989 8 months ago
@Periph1989 I only need to use 2 possibilities because every religion other than christianity was created by illuminati/masons (lucifer worshipers) to purposely deceive people from the truth. In other words every religion is false. Talk to any TRUE christian and they will tell u christianity isnt a religion its a relationship with Jesus Christ. Do some research on the illuminati (powerful elite secret society) and u will see how they deceived many people about how true the Bible is.
lunchbox420wb 8 months ago
@lunchbox420wb Wow. I can't tell if you're being serious, or just a poe. If you are serious, you are a pure example of how religions can poison minds. Christianity has polluted your brain, and has hindered your ability to think critically about what you believe, so you now accept crazy conspiracies. You need professional help.
Periph1989 7 months ago
@Periph1989 people that dont want to except the truth or hide the truth call it a conspiracy, people that know the truth call it facts. Have u ever looked at the back of the 1 dollar bill? it has illuminati/mason symbols all over it. Thats not a conspiracy u can look at it with ur own eyes but ur too scared to do some research because no atheist wants to get proved wrong. u say i need help but really its u that has been deceived to believe these lies
lunchbox420wb 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb LOLOLOL. You think pictures on a dollar is proof of an organization of people around the world who's goal is to control us?!?!.... Wow. You're worldview is so tainted that you'll probably believe anything. ...Sorry, but SANE people have standards with which we use to determine whether a claim is plausible or not. If you're going to make complete bat-sh*t crazy claims, like the ones you're spewing now, you're going to have to give extraordinary evidence. (continued)
Periph1989 7 months ago
@Periph1989 If you are willing to believe all this illuminati stuff, then your standards are incredibly low, and I feel sorry for you, lunchbox420wb.
Periph1989 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb So you know that god exists, how do you know that as a fact? Obviously I don't believe in god myself, I have never seen any convincing evidence. And i don't know for 100% that god does not exist, but i reject the claims that he does, go ahead make your case, unless you are a scared theist.
sandcut1 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb
Holy fuck dude... I've seen people on LSD whilst smoking w-pot that made more sense than you? DO you believe this stuff you are saying? You are taking this paracosm way to far, you need to get a PET-scan for brain damage.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 7 months ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH I wouldnt be surprised if i have brain damage from taking hits of LSD and the pot i smoked but i know what im talking about and you-your just silly
lunchbox420wb 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb
You just said that you might have brain damage but you know what you are talking about. Perhaps you brain damage made you delusional. Thinking you are telling the truth doesn't mean you are actually telling the truth.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb What if you're wrong about Krishna? What if you're wrong about Allah? What if you're wrong about Buddha, Zeus, or Thor?
goldenthroat86 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb - oh shucks. Guess what. If you don't believe in Odin and Thor, then you might not get to Valhalla. This is the oldest (and dumbest) arguments, most famously known as "Pascal's Wager" (google it). What if I don't believe in unicorns, and unicorns exist? You can make this same silly argument for any belief. Guess what? It doesn't hold water.
47f0 7 months ago
@47f0 then what does hold water? if you believe there is no God then tell me why. u must have some reasoning why u dont believe. is it because u cant see God? well thats a dumb reason for not believing. i cant see wind but i know its there. is it because u dont like being told what to do? maybe u had something bad happen to you and you cant understand why God would do that. there has to be a reason why u dont believe, dont just call something a lie because u dont want to believe it
lunchbox420wb 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb
There really is no new argument for you guys, huh?
Just keep copying and pasting from one forum or thread to the next and claiming victory in them all as you inevitably will.
FlyByW1r3 7 months ago
@FlyByW1r3 What are u talking about? copy and paste? im simply having a conversation how am i claiming victory? Atheist have no brains and they think every non-atheist thinks the same. Silly atheist, tricks are for kids. haha
lunchbox420wb 7 months ago
@lunchbox420wb "Atheist have no brains and they think every non-atheist thinks the same"
Well, there is one thing that all theists agree on(...non-atheist is a double negative btw), that: There is at least one God. That's what we disagree with, but not necessarily for the same reasons.
TheOmegajuice 7 months ago
That guy is so hilarious
ELEMENT1111100 8 months ago
It seems more atheists are calling in just to chat in these past few episodes. It does not make for an interesting show, stop calling in and let the theists get their calls in, please.
ClearlyJesus 8 months ago
@ClearlyJesus Actually, as one of the callers to the show(Alex from Muncy) I will tell you now that the call screeners do a good job of, if there is a lack of theists calling, informing you, "We would like to get more theist callers this episode, call back another time? Thanks. Bye."
BigLundi 8 months ago
The guy that goes by the name Evolved Atheist sort of comes off as a christian to me. I wouldn't give him the luxury of labeling him an atheist.
Wordlaw12 8 months ago
Actually, I don't agree with the opinions of the first caller at all but I think he is making allot more sense than they are accrediting him with. A little bit of bias I'd say.
faarsight 8 months ago
Keep doing what you guys do, you are awesome
Sarteka 8 months ago
"evolved atheist"
his name is a lie.
every time that guy calls i just facepalm
Mikeybetts 8 months ago
It Lookis like Martin is holding a bong!
SageTheAtheist 8 months ago
Yea, that guy should never be allowed to call in again. He seems insane. Like his mind can't handle being atheist- I bet he turns back to theism at some point.
Jeffersonwazright 8 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright I think he is a evangelical Christian pretending to be an atheist. When questioned he has no reason for his anti-gay views and "the bible says so" seems on the tip of his tongue to fill the gap. Without it he is just left hanging.
On the other hand he might just be an irrational dingbat who likes to think he has a rational basis for his opinions when he does not. Someone who confuses their subjective opinion with objective facts.
ristinraccoon 8 months ago
@ristinraccoon I would lean towards the irrational dingbat. I have known many non-theists who are homophobes.
Jeffersonwazright 8 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright I watched shows 713 and 714 since that comment and the irrational dingbat hypothesis is making more and more sense. He seems to be trying to justify his prejudices with semantics and word-play but avoiding establishing a reason.
ristinraccoon 8 months ago
@ristinraccoon Exactly. Just the same, I'm not sure humans need a reason to be a homophobe. I don't know if he knows he needs a reason to be a homophobe. Homophobia is natural, not metaphysical. The rational "man" is starting to reason itself out of bigotry. This atheist is not rational but an animal who is trying to think.
Jeffersonwazright 8 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright Many different species of animals, including humans, engage in consensual homosexual acts.
Humans are the only speciess that exhibit homophobia or hatred toward these individuals.
Homophobia isn't natural behavior. It's learned behavior.
ciaochowbella 8 months ago
@ciaochowbella I disagree. DNA is in control. DNA forces male humans to mate with superior DNA and it also knows the threat of homosexuality as a game ender.
Animals dont really hate in general. You cant point to animals and say "see". We are like gods compared to any other animals and not comparable.
Jeffersonwazright 8 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright Your ideas about DNA wrong, but it's completely irrelevant. Many species of animals DO engage in homosexual acts for the sheer pleasure of them. This has obviously not prevented them from reproducing.
In some cases, we can use animals to refute arguments, especially if the natural behavior of animals is held up as the example. We are not "like gods" compared to other animals. That's your skewed perspective holding humanity up as special saying that.
ciaochowbella 8 months ago
@ciaochowbella You can’t prove my ideas about DNA are wrong. You should check out Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene sometime- it’s pretty compelling. We ARE like gods compared to animals. No other animals is within 300,000 years of space travel-give or take. But many of us do act like animals so your argument has merit. I will close with this: I have observed homophobia outside of religion...ITS IS NATURAL. No matter how much you don't want it to be.
Jeffersonwazright 8 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright You misunderstand genetics. You said that DNA "knows". It doesn't. We are not "like gods" compared to animals except in our minds. I'm pretty sure most animals think we're destructive twats. Your holding up human intellect as some goal when it's just the niche we filled.
Just because you've observed homophobia outside religion doesn't make it natural. If other animals commit homosexual acts yet don't exhibit homophobia, you cannot conclude it's natural. It's social.
ciaochowbella 7 months ago
@ciaochowbella Search the video "racism is innate", watch the video, and then try and understand that homophobia is no different than racism. It is a fear of the unknown.
I'm pretty sure that most animals just think we are the most feared animal and can't think on a "destructive twat" level. I think you went a little Avatar there on me. Step away from the spiritual realm.
Jeffersonwazright 7 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright Racism isn't innate and neither is homophobia.
You also don't seem to understand that animals have been dealing with humans as a destructive species for so long that they DO instinctively avoid us for just that reason. However, they don't avoid homosexuals or homosexuality.
You're not very congnizant of how nature works, are you?
ciaochowbella 7 months ago
@ciaochowbella There was a story in Scientific American recently about how racism may be innate. One of them was a study on babies and they proved that babies took notice of other races and understood that the other race was different. Another study was one on adults and they proved that adults have less empathy for another race- some seemingly non racist people had no empathy whatsoever for another race but plenty for their own. I will admit that society makes this innate concern worse.
Jeffersonwazright 7 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright Idiotic argument. Of COURSE a white baby will notice a black baby as "different", because he's BLACK! And of COUSE the adult will be less "empathic", speccially in America where people is raised to be racist. Such stupidity.
LesPaul2006 7 months ago
@LesPaul2006 Nope. You are one of those dumbass arrogant people who speak before doing the research and/or think about it. Seemingly non racist people had little to no empathy for another race. People who were completely rational and liberal had less respect for a black person. America as in North, Central or South? Or all? Which America are you talking about?
Jeffersonwazright 7 months ago
@ciaochowbella I just realized I was talking to a woman. Now I understand the debate. You telling me homophobia is not innate is like me telling you that a monthly period is nothing to get emotional about. We simply will not see eye to eye on this subject.
Also, I rode my bicycle past dogs, ducks, geese, cats, birds, cows, and a llama this week and they did not seem to think I was too terrible. I think my cognition is ok. We avoid wild animals just like they avoid us. Its natural to avoid.
Jeffersonwazright 7 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright What a misogynistic ass you are.
Do not drag my gender into this. It has nothing to do with it.
It's obvious from your comments that you do not understand DNA or how natural selection works. It is also glaringly apparent that you're unable to differentiate socially imposed behavior from natural inclination. You just want to claim that homophobia is natural to justify your own feelings.
If homophobia is natural, why is homosexual behavior condoned in many societies?
ciaochowbella 7 months ago
@ciaochowbella OK
Yes it does. Men and women are almost a different species when it comes to the way they "feel" about things.
OK, sure, why not. I feel homophobia towards gay men. Whats the problem. I am an atheist, I understand that gay men probably cannot harm me in any way, I support gay marriage, I wish gay men no ill will, yet there is a feeling of contempt that I have that I can't explain- other than it being natural.
Because humans are rational. See comments above for more on this.
Jeffersonwazright 7 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright No, my gender has nothing to do with this subject. The fact you believe it does only illustrates your misogyny further. I'm not "feeling" about this subject. I'm drawing from fact.
The contempt you feel for gay men is directly related to the contempt you feel for women. Misogyny and homophobia are directly related and are BOTH social teachings and not natural inclinations.
If we look at your comments for rationality, we'd be on barren ground.
ciaochowbella 7 months ago
@Jeffersonwazright "Men and women are almost a different species when it comes to the way they "feel" about things."
Maybe you should consult a dictionary on the commonly understood definitions of words like 'species', because you seem to be coming up with your own as you go along.....
moopism 7 months ago
I do not think this guy is really an atheist, he is a christian calling in to make throw a wrench in the works. The Man is a brain dead word nazi.
OKCBigBear1 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RED HERRING FALLACY, RED HERRING FALLACY !!!
lmao XD
turtle5181 8 months ago
Why don't you screen these calls before accepting any of them.....This man who calls frequently is the kind of NUT you don't need !
ftjax 8 months ago
shmarrige rocks! :-)
dvnarxx 8 months ago
Why do you keep on letting this guy come on and waste time. There are a lot more nutters who what to have their first chance to be on the show.
chrisdicki 8 months ago
Research the experiences of:
Howard Storm
Ian McCormack
Mickey Robinson
christianTubeVids 8 months ago
another one i like regarding big numbers, if you take a glass of water, and calculate the odds that a single hydrogen atom is there in front of you, you'll find its almost impossible that there is a glass of water in front of you. yet there it is.
roont 8 months ago
If this "gay basher" is reading, let me tell you to put your questions very logically and precisely, otherwise please go to school and learn to speak plainly and wisely, Mr. Confused-Mind
symmetry08 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Christians, Jews, atheists and people of all faith communities crooked shall they give accountable to Allah Subhanallah ve Taâla for a one day!
SuperGeniusLife 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
chapter 112 Quran.com
112:1 Say, "He is Allah , [who is] One,
112:2 Allah , the Eternal Refuge.
112:3 He neither begets nor is born,
112:4 Nor is there to Him any equivalent."
Holy Quran the last revelation and the best description of our creator.
omerkha 8 months ago
I signed the American Family Association up for porn sites and gay sites. They will be sooo pissed at all of the X rated spam the get. Payback^^
SexyArcanine666 8 months ago
In Californian legal documents it is called a "Domestic Patnership". I guess to distinguish it from traditional marrige.
holio84 8 months ago
marriage is a social institution, and a necessary one, so as to keep parents united, reduce infidelities, and raise children, the future pioneers of civilization in a stable and institutionalized environment.
AyeSkyeTech 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AyeSkyeTech "marriage is a social institution, and a necessary one, so as to keep parents united, reduce infidelities, and raise children, the future pioneers of civilization in a stable and institutionalized environment"
How's that workin' so far?
I've been with my wife for 35 years and have raised 3 children. We didn't get married until child # 3 10 years ago. Marriage is not required to do any of the things you posted.
hawklord2001 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To them,''they say''we came from apes...The atheists are irrational creatures, animals, the brain makes more sense than even the atheist's brain.
Fuck all unbelievers: Christianity - Judaism - atheists - satanists - sexual deviant people - buddhism.Fuck all atheists! An Atheist is the brain of a monkey's brain.Now it was full.
SuperGeniusLife 8 months ago
It's like these people have never heard about the established unconstitutional practice of "separate but equal".
x0AuG0x 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 8 months ago
All atheists are son of bitch!
SuperGeniusLife 8 months ago
@SuperGeniusLife I told you before, that's not true! Some of us are pricks and dickheads!
gspendlove 8 months ago
@SuperGeniusLife You might as well say "DEATH TO ALL INFADELS"!
PlatinumGlitchMint4 8 months ago
@SuperGeniusLife How do you know my mother is a Bitch? Is it because your mother is a cunt?
whanethewhip 8 months ago
@whanethewhip Her mother had not been a bitch, now you'd be a believer.You come from the descendants of adultery.Their mothers and fathers before marriage and got married, you are coming to the world.Your regard to the latter a complete disappointment.But you do not have the brain to understand it.You have no honor.You will experience the world as a bastard.Do you know that you are now.
SuperGeniusLife 8 months ago
@SuperGeniusLife I have no honor? You have no brain. You are the one on YT making up shit about people you don't know. I wish you had the balls to say this shit to my face... just you and me. :) But you are a coward hiding behind your keyboard talking shit. Hello keyboard warrior, I'm sorry you are a pussy and YT is all you have. Don't you have a pig to fuck or something?
whanethewhip 8 months ago
3:00 to 13:00 the most wasted 10 minutes ever...
nightvidcole 8 months ago
Good point about why wouldn't an atheist leave such a strongly religious country. I've thought about leaving myself, trust me. And France sounds like a great place to go to considering majority of the social norms there sound better compared to those of USA.
willquestion 8 months ago
When it comes to languages, word definitions can change over time. Look at the word gay. It once meant happy, but slowly switched over to mean homosexual. That was a cultural change. Then you have scientific definition changes like what happened with the term "planet" recently. Words, whether they be cultural, scientific, or legal, can change and do change over time. This may very well happen with the word "marriage".
willquestion 8 months ago
Comment removed
willquestion 8 months ago
there are so many things that are so wrong about this call its not even funny
spawn10317 8 months ago
Comment removed
brwneyes66 8 months ago
@brwneyes66 are you on drugs?
ShroomFuu86 8 months ago
@brwneyes66 proof of god and proof that god created marriage? please..
ozdcderek 8 months ago
@OPE08 so i say john won the lottery yesterday.. you believe him, i don't.
so your statement how can you disbelieve in something that doesn't exist. you simply don't. your trying to change the definition of atheism, not gonna work.
ozdcderek 8 months ago
@OPE08 as a small child we dont believe in the supernatural.. correct. as a small child i don't believe in electricity either.. until evidence is presented to me and thus i believe. some people choose to believe in things without evidence. god religon, believin that a person is telling the truth about something with god. i just choose not to believe in god. the other person does believe in god. so i lack a belief in god. as opposed to other person.
ozdcderek 8 months ago
@OPE08 your being ridiculous.. belief and existence are two different things.. sorry flyingspaghettimoner is right. i can BELIEVE anything. i can believe im going to fly if i jump off a bridge. i can believe in fairies.. belief has nothing to do with existence.. it doesnt have to be prove to exist 1st to disbelieve. how can you disbelieve something doesnt exist. easy . you just dont beleive.
ozdcderek 8 months ago
The guy on the right reminds me of Nostalgia critic.
Benchiladas 8 months ago
this is guy is a moron lol
ozdcderek 8 months ago
ive watched some of your shows & its funny to see that though youve made good points disproving the religious view of a personified, rule based God..they havent disproved God. im not of religion, just spiritual but since their all about facts & science..heres some..energy can neither be created nor destroyed, its eternal, everything is made of energy, including intellegent thoughts, so it has been intellegent way before we were able to utilize it, God is potential energy, the world is kenitic
carljsociety 8 months ago
@carljsociety
I'll answer for them.
P.S. no youtube channel is owned by this show.
What reason do you have to say that God is potential energy, or even that the world is kinetic?
I see no reason to think of potential energy as anything other than potential energy. It is very well described and understood.
The word god is very ill described, and is even less understood.
Why take something that is known, and make it a mystical unknown. That is a step in the wrong direction.
christoph2005 8 months ago
Comment removed
carljsociety 8 months ago
Please don't take calls from that EvolvedAtheist guy anymore. It's such a waste of time. All he does is spew out the same arguments in the same call over and over. It might be fun to debate him but probably bores your viewers, or at least it does this one. Still, great show.
paradigm71 8 months ago
@paradigm71 -- I know, eh?... it's a pity that his call was taken for episode #713 as well. I think by now that we are all familiar with the narrow-minded, homophobic one-track bigotry this asshat brings to the table.
To paraphrase his own copy-and-paste manifesto (which you receive if he selects you during his trolls of individuals commenting on his nonsense in these channels), science will eventually prove he is harmful as it does for all things we find disgusting, ie. the opinions of EA.
P0weredByPie 8 months ago
I disagree that the word "Marriage" would imply a commitment between man and a woman. However, I realize why the church won't/can't bless gay marriages as it goes against their dogma. So could I demand that the church would bless gay marriages...well, not really. Regardless even I think the idea of god and religions is utter bullshit...
juuonse 8 months ago
I have a feeling this guy is very insecure about his sexuality: his whole argument of the word marraige is between hetros. Presumably he is an hetro. But marraige is a personal thing between 2 people, so if he was married himself what has anyone else got to do with it? The success or failure of the marraige depends on him. But he is afraid of his responsibility for the strength of his relationshiip. So makes him try to contrive an outside cause. He really is homophobic.
intermender 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jofx1992 He's black therefore he's ignorant. Considering that im a darker complexion means im less intelligent that you is your sense of logic. Sorry my friend but that is an ignorant comparison. He is a dumb ass though lol
terrellmac100 8 months ago
Comment removed
terrellmac100 8 months ago
Comment removed
terrellmac100 8 months ago
he doesnt know any better, hes black
jofx1992 8 months ago