this cunts says Africans have had no great civilisations. maybe he should take a look at the egyptian pyramids and how we can not even recreate the precision with modern technology. He clearly has a degree in sucking cock the stupid fucking inbred.
@camboy9 i agree with you in that Africa has had some pretty fabulous civilizations and crucial architectural and otherwise historical accomplishments. but by insulting you do exactly what he does, which helps nothing.
@5W909 I just dont have time for people like that, they claim to be educated and yet cant even see past racial or ethnic barriers. its just stupid. and there is no other way to go about it than insult him.
@camboy9 because insulting them as they insult many other people makes us seem like baseless, illogical, un-philosophical hypocrites which is exactly what we want because this clearly helps the issue at hand. gotcha.
(continued) based on the facts deems whether you are racist or not. As I said, it seems highly probably to me, and evidence would certainly suggest it, that each race has evolved under separate conditions, climates etc which leads to different characteristics - how can they be absolutely identical? As a white person I could admit that averagely, East Asian IQ (that is, for example, of Japan) is slightly higher than that of whites. This could simply be due to genetics. Am I racist now?
I don't think he is racist. Race is now a hugely sensitive topic, but how can we automatically assume there are no differences, no characteristics that make each race separate, unique? Any study of this is deemed racist, but facts are facts - and who really knows the facts if racial studies are prohibited if the results do not meet politically correct requirements?
I personally believe there are differences between races - if there are, stating it is not racist - how you choose to act ...
@johnbr59 I'm afraid he is racist when he believes money shouldn't be spent on poor black families. Sorry but that's a brute fact. Of course he's not racist when he states scientifically proven facts and of course you are not racist for doing that either. Unfortunately to suggest that somebodies skin color makes them a danger to a country is, by logical necessity racist. end of. sorry you don't agree.
i am a muslim british bangladeshi, and what this person so called proffesor said has offendded even me!!i am not black i am asian but what this person is saying can hurt the feelings of so many people its unbeleivable!!!
For the rest of regular Englishmen: You're welcomed in Czech..We have freedom, democracy ..We're that's to say still normal..And there's enough of brooms for you here to get a job.
NO. Racism can be casual and not incite racial hatred, which is what he's doing.
Inciting racial hatred is burning down a persons home because he's black, or hanging them because they have melanin in their skin. Tow differing things.
Analogy = sexim and inciting sexual hatred
Women can't drive = sexiam
I hate women they are stupid idiots that must die = inciting sexual hatred.
Clearly different, apply the concept to racism and you'll see :)
Well, racism originally used to mean understanding different values about different races and about putting your own race first but unfortunately, racism now means hating a race. Sexism used to mean exactly the same but now it means bigotry to the opposite gender and the same applies with ageism. All thanks to political correct cultural Marxism.
YOU SEE those are the things I just can't do! Put my race first, put my sex first, put my age first! WHY? So you were randomly born black/white/asian, BIG WOOP! Let's put ALL races first, in harmony. Let's all celebrate and become active in cultural and religious diversity! Why put my race first and another persons below mine! WHY RANK AND PUT THINGS IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE! EQUALITY = all things on an equal level! Hitler put the Aryan race first...
Rubbish! You do not see races all mongrelised together, you see them amongst their own kind in their own land. By putting people first, that does not mean one is superior than the other, it means that you are part of that race and your race is different to the other. And to put your race first means to stop immigration, multiculturalism is a myth and it is used to dilute national unity.
@5W909 I pose a question to you; why should a people and culture not be allowed to put their own interests and goals first? Your position assumes all people and cultures have the same goals and interests. In some ways yes, but other ways no. All cultures and people are unique and different; you talk about 'celebrating' them all above. But for such cultures to remain intact they must strive to remain intact against external pressures. Multiculturalism is the enemy of true multiculturalism.
@johnbr59 My position is that multiculturalism can exist and can be beneficial. In what way, therefore does this suggest I believe that all cultures have the 'same goals and interests'. OF COURSE THEY DON'T - but why can't these goals and interests all be achieved on one strip of land (providing that they are not radical goals such as some Muslim's desire to turn the west into the east).
Multiculturalism doesn't threaten but enriches, innovates and enhances.
I am in the BNP, of course no-one knows, but still we are a democratic party, we are not controlled by political correctness so we are allowed to say what we feel. However, I disagree with this man but I think that you need to refer to the context in which he is speaking about and that is welfare dependancy, surrogate parents and gang culture in London. The problem with him is that he said "all blacks" when he should really have said "some blacks".
He shouldn't have said 'some blacks' he should have said 'some of every race'. The fact of the matter is there are rapists, murderers, terrorists, geniuses, inventors and prodigies in every race. There is no need whatsoever to single out one group of people (immigrants or Muslims since you're BNP) and bash them THEN call it free speech. With rights come responsibilities and I think the whole 'responsibility' thing is something forgotten by A LOT of people BNP or not.
He seemed to have been referring to black Londoners who were brought up with surrogate parents with more than one sibling and there has been a lot of gang culture amongst black people in London such as Yardie culture and Peckham boys, I am not denying that it happens with other races but somehow what he was saying seems to show that blacks are the majority. Even Richard Barnbrook pointed this out in the GLA. But yes, it was stupid to say that "all blacks".
The problem with this video is that he was having a private conversation and when you have private conversations you are about to say somethings of which everyone would not expect. We slag our friends off and we closetly dislike some people but we say that privately and use the words which we really wish not to use and would not use if we are in public, it is a normal thing.
The thing in when we are in those private conversations we are honest. We say what we REALLY mean in private conversations. Ask him his opinions on black people in public and he will never be as honest as that. Catch him being himself in a normal conversation and you are able to see the real person. It is normal to put on fronts in public and be more like yourself in private. We want politicians as themselves not as their TV front. Exposing people like this is always a good thing.
He did not say hateful things about black people, he made a few over statements. When we speak privately, we are not always honest either because we might just be critical about something but go a bit the wrong way. I have said in private that I hate all the students simply because I was critical about a few students, and not really with all the students at all. Exposing people like this is totalitarian, you might as well tap into everyone's telephone line to make sure that there is no slander.
'a danger to the peace and stability of the indigenous culture of Britain, and we think they are'
'the black kids are going to grow up dysfunctional, low iq, low achievers that drain our welfare system'
NOT RACIST!? Come on... THIS is the problem with the BNP and their followers. You dudes don't feel what others feel when people make comments like those above, just to name a FEW.
Since he comes from a party that is only for Indigenous Britons which is perceived to be racist and since you ask yourself "why not white dysfunctionals?" well I ask, "why not Asian dysfunctionals?" He did not say Asians since they are in the similar category as black Britons because the two are non-indigenous. This is because he was referring to the majority of black Londoners on welfare dependancy which a great many are. Knife crime has thrived a lot amongst black Britons in London.
And also, being honest in a private conversation is normal. Being racist and offensive like that may also be a normal thing for him or people like him to be. However, that is not an excuse, and is the FANTASTIC thing about this video. It exposed the REAL Phil Edwards, which is why he was chopped off of the BNP just like Mark Collett :D
How were the two chopped off the BNP? They are still here. He was being as honest as he was just like he was in public but sometimes we may say things that we may not have meant.
I am not his spokesperson, but I am saying that he made an overstatement and I think that we know that we say mistakes in our private conversation whenever we have one. What do you mean that Mark Collett was chopped off the BNP? He is now Director of Publicity for them.
Oh dear! I didn't know that he was Director of Publicity - I retract my previous comment about him then.
ANYWAY, I'm racially, religiously and culturally neutral. Which means I have a natural problem with organisations like the National Black Police officers association and the BNP who take pride in putting their culture/race/heritage above others in order to importance.
You may, but I don't see the point. I love and take pride in ALL the history and cultures I have experience/know about.
The Black Police officers association stands up for black people in the police force as the BNP stands up for Indigenous Britons against mass immigration and the EU. That is diversity for you, you might as well blame nature for creating diversity of races, ethnic groups, the opposite genders or different cultures because they are all part of life.
@5W909 But wouldn't you agree a culture should hold more importance than others in the place that it originated and developed over thousands of years? Do you think Japan should push over for Western culture, or Pakistan push over for Christianity? You can respect all cultures equally but that doesn't mean multiculturalism is functional in one nation.
@johnbr59 First of all multiculturalism can exist without destroying the fabric of the natives culture: to deny this would be to submit to severe ignorance.
You may think why should I fear them as a fellow white, well maybe because I think they will turn on everyone else once they sorted out the other races.
It's not about our nature that makes us intelligent or otherwise but how we are nurtured.
If I was left in Africa as a baby I would be in the same boat as the black africans, I would face the same hardships as any other african. To think your race somehow makes you more intelligent is just stupid. He calls himself a scientist, what a cunt
I beg to disagree. A black child has as much potential as any other human being - our only differences are amounts of pigmentation. The problems lies in the fact that because black people are essentially of immigrant descent they have not been able to climb to the same heights, in Britain, as whites. This is because the whites are established whereas the blacks are 'new'; as the saying goes rome wasn't built in a day. I'm black and i am the total contrary to Mr. Edwards description of my race.
I'm black and i'm also the exact oposite of what he described, this hurts to honest.
There were many great civilisation in africa, dose phil edwards know that whites didn't even used to wash themselves until they went to Egypt and and were taught about baths? What an idiot.
I can't stand this low IQ crap. We're intelligent, it just that these people can't seem to look past our dark skin for some strange reason.
Well I'm a BNP supporter and Phil Edwards views do not reflect mine. The non raciest anti immigration members of the BNP outnumber these oddball characters.
Thank you for the comment. But I really do have an issue with the 'non racist' members and supporters of the BNP. It's an oxymoronic statement you just made as well 'non racist anit immigration members'. Racism is the discrimination of a group of people due to their racial heritage. Sending some foreigners out of the country, by force, is just that: discrimination by race. So i am unable to comprehend how this is not racist in anyway?
only people here illegally will be removed. Nobody here legally will be forced to move. Those who wish to return back to their country of origin will be given a cash incentive; and that already exists now anyway. But it is true that our borders will be closed to a large percentage of new migrants.
Oh and the reason why I think we should close shop is based on my views of economics and not race. I agree with about 70% of what the BNP stand for. Trying to solve the looming pension crisis by having 3.5 to 7 workers per retired person is not a solution, its a path to hell.
Also immigrants who commit crimes will be removed. But my thoughts are, how much of a safe society will be left for people like me - i'm already the victim of much hate, so why will this change just because borders are closed, or illegal immigrants are gone? I think you'll find the problems with BNP immigration policies lies with the discrimination people like myself will have to face when I'm older, in a BNP Britain. I will never find a job with the notion, 'British jobs for British People'
I see really dark days ahead. The country is on the verge of an economic collapse. Oil is at or near peak flow so there will be no recovery. The next 20 years are going to be very different to the last 20. We need a government with the balls to make the hard choices.
My logic was flawless till you said that. I don't have an answer and its obvious I'm going to have to think this through more.
May I ask where you live or grew up. I am not a racist I hate nobody, but I can tell you growing up in greater london with a wide variety of friends, if your looking for bad apples you will on average find more in black populations. 3 quaters of the drug dealers, thieves, unemployed benefit leeches and school failing knife carriers are from a non white back ground, mostly black subsaharan africa or carribean. I am a chemistry student I like to look at things analytically, there is an IQ deficit.
I live and have grown up in Birmingham. For 5 years I attended a comprehensive school in which 95% were of an ethnic background (90% Asian ethnicity). For my points sake I will tell you 4 of us, including myself, are moving on to study for our A levels at the 3rd ranked co-ed grammar school in all of England. We did not get their by being, quote, 'low IQ, dysfunctional people, draining prison systems and welfare'. This is one of many reason I can hastily argue with the words of Phil Edwards.
You must understand every race has a group of people who make it seem an incompetent race. Your statistics are possibly true, though i've never seen them myself. However i could argue there or more white priests who are pedophiles. I could also argue there are far more white people in our history who have acted with behaviors of a genocidal nature. Not even Hitler or Stalin, but take a look at the 80% of Native Indians that were wiped out by the white people who now call themselves Americans.
Concluding, a group of peoples criticizable characteristics is not an invitation of racism, segregation and disintegration between these people and their criticizers . It is horrid to think that I am wanted out of the country I, as a youth, have tried to contribute so much to. Intolerance is what kills, it killed millions of Jews, and Native Indians. It enslaved thousands of Blacks and Asians and continues to give birth to hostilities like the BNP. I think that is now enough from me.
I agree with you on that one BNPfail. The BNP are wishing to throw away all great assets of contemporary, Britain: namely multiculturalism. And again, calling you a traitor is mindless, having an opinion doesn't make you or any right-minded (or should i say left-minded :P) person a traitor.
multiculturalism is a jokes, an illusion I see a culture as the medium in which our children are brought up in, people coming to this country rarely integrate in a sense that people in the 50's did. If someone from pakistan moved onto my road he could go all day speaking hardly no english, they dominate this area rarely mixing with whites, they set up there shops and name them after citys in the east and only care about money and not the people of this country. national socialism all the way.
This has been flagged as spam show
"Fascists are human dust." - Leon Trotsky.
TerrySleeper 2 months ago
How deluded is this old man. Everyone knows old people don't know what they are talking about.
basebeatsuk 2 months ago
this cunts says Africans have had no great civilisations. maybe he should take a look at the egyptian pyramids and how we can not even recreate the precision with modern technology. He clearly has a degree in sucking cock the stupid fucking inbred.
camboy9 1 year ago
@camboy9 i agree with you in that Africa has had some pretty fabulous civilizations and crucial architectural and otherwise historical accomplishments. but by insulting you do exactly what he does, which helps nothing.
5W909 1 year ago
@5W909 I just dont have time for people like that, they claim to be educated and yet cant even see past racial or ethnic barriers. its just stupid. and there is no other way to go about it than insult him.
camboy9 1 year ago
@camboy9 because insulting them as they insult many other people makes us seem like baseless, illogical, un-philosophical hypocrites which is exactly what we want because this clearly helps the issue at hand. gotcha.
ExoticFury1 1 year ago
(continued) based on the facts deems whether you are racist or not. As I said, it seems highly probably to me, and evidence would certainly suggest it, that each race has evolved under separate conditions, climates etc which leads to different characteristics - how can they be absolutely identical? As a white person I could admit that averagely, East Asian IQ (that is, for example, of Japan) is slightly higher than that of whites. This could simply be due to genetics. Am I racist now?
johnbr59 1 year ago
I don't think he is racist. Race is now a hugely sensitive topic, but how can we automatically assume there are no differences, no characteristics that make each race separate, unique? Any study of this is deemed racist, but facts are facts - and who really knows the facts if racial studies are prohibited if the results do not meet politically correct requirements?
I personally believe there are differences between races - if there are, stating it is not racist - how you choose to act ...
johnbr59 1 year ago
@johnbr59 I'm afraid he is racist when he believes money shouldn't be spent on poor black families. Sorry but that's a brute fact. Of course he's not racist when he states scientifically proven facts and of course you are not racist for doing that either. Unfortunately to suggest that somebodies skin color makes them a danger to a country is, by logical necessity racist. end of. sorry you don't agree.
5W909 1 year ago
Phil Edwards is correct.
Iron1023 1 year ago
i am a muslim british bangladeshi, and what this person so called proffesor said has offendded even me!!i am not black i am asian but what this person is saying can hurt the feelings of so many people its unbeleivable!!!
khaadim1 1 year ago
@khaadim1 Who cares if it offends people, the truth must be put out.
Iron1023 1 year ago
@Iron1023 shove dat iron wer da sun dont shine mate
khaadim1 1 year ago
For the rest of regular Englishmen: You're welcomed in Czech..We have freedom, democracy ..We're that's to say still normal..And there's enough of brooms for you here to get a job.
vejsiska 2 years ago
Plus, I would not say that that was racist because he was not inciting racial hatred but just a dumb overstatement which he really needs to revise.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
INCITING racial hatred and RACISM are two slightly differing concepts.
BNP = racist and very discriminative
Nazi + KKK = racist + inciting racial hatred
by using those examples I'm sure you'll be able to spot the difference between the 2 concepts :)
5W909 2 years ago
Racism is normally defined as inciting racial hatred or hating someone because of their race and that is not what he was doing.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
NO. Racism can be casual and not incite racial hatred, which is what he's doing.
Inciting racial hatred is burning down a persons home because he's black, or hanging them because they have melanin in their skin. Tow differing things.
Analogy = sexim and inciting sexual hatred
Women can't drive = sexiam
I hate women they are stupid idiots that must die = inciting sexual hatred.
Clearly different, apply the concept to racism and you'll see :)
5W909 2 years ago
Well, racism originally used to mean understanding different values about different races and about putting your own race first but unfortunately, racism now means hating a race. Sexism used to mean exactly the same but now it means bigotry to the opposite gender and the same applies with ageism. All thanks to political correct cultural Marxism.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
YOU SEE those are the things I just can't do! Put my race first, put my sex first, put my age first! WHY? So you were randomly born black/white/asian, BIG WOOP! Let's put ALL races first, in harmony. Let's all celebrate and become active in cultural and religious diversity! Why put my race first and another persons below mine! WHY RANK AND PUT THINGS IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE! EQUALITY = all things on an equal level! Hitler put the Aryan race first...
5W909 2 years ago
Rubbish! You do not see races all mongrelised together, you see them amongst their own kind in their own land. By putting people first, that does not mean one is superior than the other, it means that you are part of that race and your race is different to the other. And to put your race first means to stop immigration, multiculturalism is a myth and it is used to dilute national unity.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
@5W909 I pose a question to you; why should a people and culture not be allowed to put their own interests and goals first? Your position assumes all people and cultures have the same goals and interests. In some ways yes, but other ways no. All cultures and people are unique and different; you talk about 'celebrating' them all above. But for such cultures to remain intact they must strive to remain intact against external pressures. Multiculturalism is the enemy of true multiculturalism.
johnbr59 1 year ago
@johnbr59 My position is that multiculturalism can exist and can be beneficial. In what way, therefore does this suggest I believe that all cultures have the 'same goals and interests'. OF COURSE THEY DON'T - but why can't these goals and interests all be achieved on one strip of land (providing that they are not radical goals such as some Muslim's desire to turn the west into the east).
Multiculturalism doesn't threaten but enriches, innovates and enhances.
5W909 1 year ago
I am in the BNP, of course no-one knows, but still we are a democratic party, we are not controlled by political correctness so we are allowed to say what we feel. However, I disagree with this man but I think that you need to refer to the context in which he is speaking about and that is welfare dependancy, surrogate parents and gang culture in London. The problem with him is that he said "all blacks" when he should really have said "some blacks".
NatDemUK 2 years ago
He shouldn't have said 'some blacks' he should have said 'some of every race'. The fact of the matter is there are rapists, murderers, terrorists, geniuses, inventors and prodigies in every race. There is no need whatsoever to single out one group of people (immigrants or Muslims since you're BNP) and bash them THEN call it free speech. With rights come responsibilities and I think the whole 'responsibility' thing is something forgotten by A LOT of people BNP or not.
5W909 2 years ago
He seemed to have been referring to black Londoners who were brought up with surrogate parents with more than one sibling and there has been a lot of gang culture amongst black people in London such as Yardie culture and Peckham boys, I am not denying that it happens with other races but somehow what he was saying seems to show that blacks are the majority. Even Richard Barnbrook pointed this out in the GLA. But yes, it was stupid to say that "all blacks".
NatDemUK 2 years ago
AND IF PEOPLE WHO SAY THINGS LIKE THAT ARE THE PEOPLE YOU WISH TO POLITICALLY WORSHIP THEN THAT'S FINE :D
"Every man to his own taste" - Jostein Gaarder in Sophie's World
5W909 2 years ago
The problem with this video is that he was having a private conversation and when you have private conversations you are about to say somethings of which everyone would not expect. We slag our friends off and we closetly dislike some people but we say that privately and use the words which we really wish not to use and would not use if we are in public, it is a normal thing.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
The thing in when we are in those private conversations we are honest. We say what we REALLY mean in private conversations. Ask him his opinions on black people in public and he will never be as honest as that. Catch him being himself in a normal conversation and you are able to see the real person. It is normal to put on fronts in public and be more like yourself in private. We want politicians as themselves not as their TV front. Exposing people like this is always a good thing.
5W909 2 years ago
He did not say hateful things about black people, he made a few over statements. When we speak privately, we are not always honest either because we might just be critical about something but go a bit the wrong way. I have said in private that I hate all the students simply because I was critical about a few students, and not really with all the students at all. Exposing people like this is totalitarian, you might as well tap into everyone's telephone line to make sure that there is no slander.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
'a danger to the peace and stability of the indigenous culture of Britain, and we think they are'
'the black kids are going to grow up dysfunctional, low iq, low achievers that drain our welfare system'
NOT RACIST!? Come on... THIS is the problem with the BNP and their followers. You dudes don't feel what others feel when people make comments like those above, just to name a FEW.
5W909 2 years ago
Since he comes from a party that is only for Indigenous Britons which is perceived to be racist and since you ask yourself "why not white dysfunctionals?" well I ask, "why not Asian dysfunctionals?" He did not say Asians since they are in the similar category as black Britons because the two are non-indigenous. This is because he was referring to the majority of black Londoners on welfare dependancy which a great many are. Knife crime has thrived a lot amongst black Britons in London.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
And also, being honest in a private conversation is normal. Being racist and offensive like that may also be a normal thing for him or people like him to be. However, that is not an excuse, and is the FANTASTIC thing about this video. It exposed the REAL Phil Edwards, which is why he was chopped off of the BNP just like Mark Collett :D
5W909 2 years ago
How were the two chopped off the BNP? They are still here. He was being as honest as he was just like he was in public but sometimes we may say things that we may not have meant.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
'sometimes we may say things that we may not have meant.'
Question: when did you become his spokesperson! Of course he meant it! :)
And Mark Collett was chopped off the BNP for his naughty Nazi comment exposed in his home by the BBC - infiltrations like these show you the light :)
5W909 2 years ago
I am not his spokesperson, but I am saying that he made an overstatement and I think that we know that we say mistakes in our private conversation whenever we have one. What do you mean that Mark Collett was chopped off the BNP? He is now Director of Publicity for them.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
Oh dear! I didn't know that he was Director of Publicity - I retract my previous comment about him then.
ANYWAY, I'm racially, religiously and culturally neutral. Which means I have a natural problem with organisations like the National Black Police officers association and the BNP who take pride in putting their culture/race/heritage above others in order to importance.
You may, but I don't see the point. I love and take pride in ALL the history and cultures I have experience/know about.
5W909 2 years ago
The Black Police officers association stands up for black people in the police force as the BNP stands up for Indigenous Britons against mass immigration and the EU. That is diversity for you, you might as well blame nature for creating diversity of races, ethnic groups, the opposite genders or different cultures because they are all part of life.
NatDemUK 2 years ago
@5W909 But wouldn't you agree a culture should hold more importance than others in the place that it originated and developed over thousands of years? Do you think Japan should push over for Western culture, or Pakistan push over for Christianity? You can respect all cultures equally but that doesn't mean multiculturalism is functional in one nation.
johnbr59 1 year ago
@johnbr59 First of all multiculturalism can exist without destroying the fabric of the natives culture: to deny this would be to submit to severe ignorance.
5W909 1 year ago
Difference in ways of thinking... that's all this is!
5W909 2 years ago
scum utter scum they should grow up so childish scum
leatherfisherman 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
Longsword24 2 years ago
there is plenty of black mozarts and plenty of black dickens lol hes a fuckin half wit jesus christ
ubmilitant 2 years ago
any1 who beleives what he sez are spastics he is wrong
ubmilitant 2 years ago
He is without a doubt the biggest cunt on youtube
bigcritic101 2 years ago 4
Have these people moved forward?
kokumoabeng 2 years ago
You may think why should I fear them as a fellow white, well maybe because I think they will turn on everyone else once they sorted out the other races.
It's not about our nature that makes us intelligent or otherwise but how we are nurtured.
If I was left in Africa as a baby I would be in the same boat as the black africans, I would face the same hardships as any other african. To think your race somehow makes you more intelligent is just stupid. He calls himself a scientist, what a cunt
FreakinSweet86 2 years ago
"there's no black mozart"
WELL THERE'S NO BLACK YORKSHIRE RIPPER.
hamsterenforcer 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Phil Edwards has the courage to see reality.
merrimac291 2 years ago
I beg to disagree. A black child has as much potential as any other human being - our only differences are amounts of pigmentation. The problems lies in the fact that because black people are essentially of immigrant descent they have not been able to climb to the same heights, in Britain, as whites. This is because the whites are established whereas the blacks are 'new'; as the saying goes rome wasn't built in a day. I'm black and i am the total contrary to Mr. Edwards description of my race.
5W909 2 years ago
I'm black and i'm also the exact oposite of what he described, this hurts to honest.
There were many great civilisation in africa, dose phil edwards know that whites didn't even used to wash themselves until they went to Egypt and and were taught about baths? What an idiot.
I can't stand this low IQ crap. We're intelligent, it just that these people can't seem to look past our dark skin for some strange reason.
Machspeed4 2 years ago
Yeah and I know there are mistakes in my post lol it's cus I type really fast and don't ever bother to check ¬_¬
Machspeed4 2 years ago
Well I'm a BNP supporter and Phil Edwards views do not reflect mine. The non raciest anti immigration members of the BNP outnumber these oddball characters.
Bl0odguard 2 years ago
Thank you for the comment. But I really do have an issue with the 'non racist' members and supporters of the BNP. It's an oxymoronic statement you just made as well 'non racist anit immigration members'. Racism is the discrimination of a group of people due to their racial heritage. Sending some foreigners out of the country, by force, is just that: discrimination by race. So i am unable to comprehend how this is not racist in anyway?
5W909 2 years ago
only people here illegally will be removed. Nobody here legally will be forced to move. Those who wish to return back to their country of origin will be given a cash incentive; and that already exists now anyway. But it is true that our borders will be closed to a large percentage of new migrants.
Bl0odguard 2 years ago
Oh and the reason why I think we should close shop is based on my views of economics and not race. I agree with about 70% of what the BNP stand for. Trying to solve the looming pension crisis by having 3.5 to 7 workers per retired person is not a solution, its a path to hell.
Bl0odguard 2 years ago
Also immigrants who commit crimes will be removed. But my thoughts are, how much of a safe society will be left for people like me - i'm already the victim of much hate, so why will this change just because borders are closed, or illegal immigrants are gone? I think you'll find the problems with BNP immigration policies lies with the discrimination people like myself will have to face when I'm older, in a BNP Britain. I will never find a job with the notion, 'British jobs for British People'
5W909 2 years ago
Excellent point.
I see really dark days ahead. The country is on the verge of an economic collapse. Oil is at or near peak flow so there will be no recovery. The next 20 years are going to be very different to the last 20. We need a government with the balls to make the hard choices.
My logic was flawless till you said that. I don't have an answer and its obvious I'm going to have to think this through more.
Bl0odguard 2 years ago
I see you BNPfail everywhere on issues of the BNP are you indigenous white british may I ask?
jackle5000 2 years ago
no that it matters, im 5th generation scottish, heterosexual, white and married.
So i'm "pure" in blood. If thats what you mean.
BNPfail 2 years ago
Deport this individual.
Id rather have ANYONE else in the country than the likes of this.
Trying to make out he's a scientist ffs. A disgrace.
BNPfail 2 years ago
He speaks the truth. you should be deported traitor.
jackle5000 2 years ago
What truth does he speak exactly? As from personal experience everything he has said is far, far from what is true?
5W909 2 years ago
May I ask where you live or grew up. I am not a racist I hate nobody, but I can tell you growing up in greater london with a wide variety of friends, if your looking for bad apples you will on average find more in black populations. 3 quaters of the drug dealers, thieves, unemployed benefit leeches and school failing knife carriers are from a non white back ground, mostly black subsaharan africa or carribean. I am a chemistry student I like to look at things analytically, there is an IQ deficit.
jackle5000 2 years ago
Glasgow, where dogmatic white on white violence is the order of the day.
BNPfail 2 years ago
I live and have grown up in Birmingham. For 5 years I attended a comprehensive school in which 95% were of an ethnic background (90% Asian ethnicity). For my points sake I will tell you 4 of us, including myself, are moving on to study for our A levels at the 3rd ranked co-ed grammar school in all of England. We did not get their by being, quote, 'low IQ, dysfunctional people, draining prison systems and welfare'. This is one of many reason I can hastily argue with the words of Phil Edwards.
5W909 2 years ago
You must understand every race has a group of people who make it seem an incompetent race. Your statistics are possibly true, though i've never seen them myself. However i could argue there or more white priests who are pedophiles. I could also argue there are far more white people in our history who have acted with behaviors of a genocidal nature. Not even Hitler or Stalin, but take a look at the 80% of Native Indians that were wiped out by the white people who now call themselves Americans.
5W909 2 years ago
Concluding, a group of peoples criticizable characteristics is not an invitation of racism, segregation and disintegration between these people and their criticizers . It is horrid to think that I am wanted out of the country I, as a youth, have tried to contribute so much to. Intolerance is what kills, it killed millions of Jews, and Native Indians. It enslaved thousands of Blacks and Asians and continues to give birth to hostilities like the BNP. I think that is now enough from me.
5W909 2 years ago
traitor to what?
i've sworn no allegiance to anyone.
Stop using feudal tems to describe things.
The BNP are anti-british, don't take it out on me when i point it out.
ps this mans "scientific" credentials are a joke. Just like the vicar, sikh and jewish bnp members. ALL FAKE.
BNPfail 2 years ago
I agree with you on that one BNPfail. The BNP are wishing to throw away all great assets of contemporary, Britain: namely multiculturalism. And again, calling you a traitor is mindless, having an opinion doesn't make you or any right-minded (or should i say left-minded :P) person a traitor.
5W909 2 years ago
multiculturalism is a jokes, an illusion I see a culture as the medium in which our children are brought up in, people coming to this country rarely integrate in a sense that people in the 50's did. If someone from pakistan moved onto my road he could go all day speaking hardly no english, they dominate this area rarely mixing with whites, they set up there shops and name them after citys in the east and only care about money and not the people of this country. national socialism all the way.
jackle5000 2 years ago