Added: 5 years ago
From: moni123s
Views: 149,462
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (323)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • in Russia, the tap water is not safe to drink......

  • Да, просто, не кому уже это не интересно...

    Россия уже угрозы не представляет. Лет 10 такого правления, и на нас нападут, как на Ливию.

  • In soviet Russia, plane fly you

  • Feature of the exercises was that the aircraft operated young pilots, who did not participate in such exercises. Nevertheless, pilots coped with the task.

  • Successful execution of combat missions is not only the success of the pilots. This success technicians. They will also be awarded. With the last plane landing exercises were completed. Was carried out 53 flight aircraft. Bombers climbed into the sky with a maximum combat load. The exercises were involved Su-27 and Mig-31 aircraft radar detection of early A-50 (AWACS), IL-22 command post and helicopters of the FSB.

  • These planes fly over long distances. While some crews conducted missile launches - back 4. aircraft from a base in Anadyr. Canadian and American fighters did not attempt to intercept the Russian planes with missiles. Russian pilots used to joke about it. Russian pilots carried out a training fire missiles. 4. aircraft flying in the north-west met shooting of missiles. According to A-50, which controlled the flight of missiles - all of them hitting the target.

  • Along with the airfield "White" and airfield Vozdvizhenka "climbed bombers Tu-22 M3 on board 250 kg and 500 kg bombs. The task of destroying targets on the ground in the Irkutsk Oblast and Primorsky Krai. On airfields, Engels and Anadyr rise Tu-95. 2. a pair of Tu-95, must pass along the Alaska deploy near the border of Canada and return to the airfield "Ukrainka. And from Engels 2. Tu-160 and 2. Tu-95 in the direction of Vorkuta. They will carry out a missile launch test site "North".

  • 2. part of the exercise this bombing flights on the route, as well as tactical missile launches. By location of the aircraft that stage the most ambitious. These 4. Tu-95 are in their compartments of these missiles. But the rockets will carry out only 2. crew, and led crews duplicate. Duplication is carried out if there are failures in the first crew.

  • American fighter jets intercepted them not to. May not be noticed, may not be able to fly because of bad weather - the speaker continues. Closed 1. stage of the exercises. The main thing is to come. After carrying out reconnaissance on enemy targets must be dealt a devastating air strikes. Headquarters on the basis of intelligence are developing plans for further action.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Also it is impossible to approach the Japanese border closer than 50 km in accordance with international agreements. Commander said that we did not expect such a complex air situation, but crews have coped with the task. Young pilots to complete the task as planned. After completing a task pilots did not look tired and discuss the flight.

  • According to the Russian meteorological service over Japan raging cyclone, but the pilots are not scary. Around the aircraft is very dark and very strong wind. As soon as Russian planes entered the neutral zone to them perched aircraft Japanese air force and was accompanied by over 2. hours. The lights behind a Japanese fighters. In this situation, the main thing for Russian pilots - calm. Pilots should not succumb to provocations.

  • Flag of the regiment on the airfield - continues to speaker. This is a mandatory ritual wire aircraft to perform combat missions. The first to take off 2. Tu-95. These aircraft have a job to make aerial reconnaissance. Aircraft to circumnavigate the Japanese islands from north, turn to the southern tip and back. The flight is designed for 11.5 hours. At the same time long-range bombers Tu-22 M3 to fly to the Far airfield Vozdvizenka and to conduct reconnaissance mission in the Japanese Sea.

  • Technicians ready to fly aircraft announcer says. In flight, the types of tasks can be very different. All aircraft operate flights with missiles. Some rockets are educational, but some aircraft flies with combat missiles. Requirements to preparation machines ostaetsya very strict for any mission.

  • Nice ....... ı LoOoVe ..

  • if you Dont like Russia, than dump at least half of your video games. without Russia there would be no script or themes for mission in games.

  • A russian bomber is in the air at all times, they are always on patrol.

  • We got the more than are fair share of defecting Migs, maybe we can get one of those TU-160's...I sense a new E-ride showing up at Disney World...Awesome air plane!

  • i gess it is a exercise in norway! fuck off my contry!! and fuck russia

  • dude, the flames of TU-160 at night when he is preparing to take-off is a such amazing thing, with huge sound, that isn't a word that can describe how amazing is!

  • well, the B52 shot down at least 2 mig 21s in vietnam with its tail gun!

  • @hotlanta35 uhh yes

    and mig-21s shoot down hundreds of B-52s there too :D

    nice kill ratio, isn't it?

  • @Scoutrussp7 There were only 30 B-52's total shot down over Viet Nam from SAM fire, not Mig's. A shoot down rate of "hundreds", as you say, would mean there are no more B-52's left. Nope, I was there, I know better. 

  • Let´s not forget that most Americans have a Superiority Complex that will not go away in a good while; this means it is almost impossible to see Americans admitting that their weapons can be more than matched and even surpassed by the Russian hardware..and other than the referred American Superiority Complex i fail to see any sound arguments that prove the B-52 to be superior. Extremely closely matched planes.

  • se ponen nerviosos los gays gringos con estos videos jaja

  • Интересно, север Аляски прикрывают канадские Хорнеты, они для этого базируются на американской территории, и Ту-95 летали в их зоне ответственности, и тем не менее никто не перехватил

  • duche vache din din!?

  • The Tu-95 is a hell of an airplane. I am a pilot and I had a chance to talk with military pilots in Russia about this plane. It did what it was supposed to do, and that is, give us Americans a scare. Yes, the B-52 is a superior bomber, but I would say the 95 is one of the best planes ever made. It wasn't very comfortable for the pilots and crew who flew her. They were brave and dedicated men. Let's thank God we never had to fight.

  • In my view, interior lights to illuminate instruments should be green instead of red, because red light is more fatiguing than green one

  • @anisocoro Red adjusts your eyes to darkness so at night pilots have an easier time seeing whats not lit up, such as a log book, or a dial not illuminated

    Green and blue will dialate your pupils for hi light situations. thats why they use red, and same with pontiac

  • Русский военно-воздушные силы превосходит государстве не будет облагаться налогами жить Россия

  • Для 60х годов - круто. Сейчас - это куча металлолома, летает поглощая ресурсы страны и в случае войны - эффективности никакой. Как будто время с 50х замерло.

  • i saglacen

  • Все так круто, что не верится. Хотя видно, что ту-160 летают редко... То ли топлива мала, то ли просто они не готовы к бою.. Чувствуется что есть пропаганда. Хотя хоть бы ее не было и я ошибался.

  • That AWACS Ilyushin Il-76 "Candid" is a real monster.

  • These are long range strategic bombers - missile carriers. They don't need to come close to the enemy to fire cruise missiles. they have speeds over mach 5, the missiles. That's why 95 turboprop is still used. It can go very far, cheap and fire a long range missiles, and go back. It won't face anti-aicraft, so noone gives a shit. Tu 22m and tu 160 are faster and can fly far longer than interceptors. And that is the only threat when they fire missiles from out of reach of anti aircraft systems.

  • Cause those are not hard to hit or anything.....

  • yep...just like a b-52

  • indeed.

  • These planes must be the biggest sitting ducks in the skies !!!!!!!!!

  • Unlike ducks, these planes are meant to fire missiles and turn around long before they're detected by enemy defenses.

  • hahaha, your comment is awesome

  • Fuck!, without Russia, the World is a bit more boring!.

  • @melooncillo You're right about that. And we know now that the Ireal's attack us during 9/11. 911Truth.org

  • @melooncillo no shit :D

  • @melooncillo fuck no,the russian bother other countries by going in their airspace u motherfucking bitch

  • @melooncillo Wars of Russia since '45: -Afghanistan -Chechnya (against islam insurgents at own territory) -Georgia (protecting russian monirities&against Nato encirclement) Wars of US/Nato: -Korea -Vietnam -Niceragua -Golf war -against Serbia -Afghanistan -Golf war 2 -Lybia -Iran soon? The thing is, most of US/Nato wars were without reason and only for influence spheres, during Russia was defending mostly. Who is the real threat to the world?
  • 12 часов без туалета - на ТУ-95 летают действительно выносливые ребята ребята

  • Как без туалета? А бомболюк на что???!!!

  • а через бомболюк в Ту 95 они залезают и вылезают кстати ...

  • Через нишу передней стойки шасси.

  • На борту самолёта имеется камбуз с плитой и химический туалет.

  • Я в домашней обстановке хожу 2 раза в день. В путешествие или нерновной обстановке - с нормальным питание спокойно по 2-3 суток не хожу в туалет. Даже не хочется.

  • Great planes! Go Russia + EX CCCP countries + China and all their allies! Fuck USAMA, NATO and all their fucking slaves that help them do their murders around the Globe.

    Much love for Russia, from Romania!

  • THX

  • Vă mulţumesc, prieteni!

  • Russia si Romania sunt prieteni vechi, de cand ne-ati eliberat de Turci. Too bad my leaders are kissing US ass and they get bought with suitcases full of dolarsky, just like in Greece, Bulgaria and Latvia. The tide will turn.

    Бог в православной безопасности. Здоровье!

  • ce prieteni buni... de-aia face Putin caterinca grava de Basel....

  • Tu nu ai face caterinca de un tradator care se vinde pe dolari?

  • evident. Dar nu poti sa zici ca altfel suntem amici la catarma cu rusii... carora nu prea le pasa de noi, pentru ca nu au de ce sa le pese.

  • meanie I'm from Canada lol jk, but seriously I'm from Canada.

  • Canada is still cool. USA is not so cool anymoe.

  • watch out for over loading the tu95

    it might break in half trying to take off

    :)

  • is that upgraded b-29 bomber? ^

  • oh got there before me

    good joke man

  • Yes. Such piece will inform the nuclear weapon up to any point of globe.

  • Well, men, Tu-160 and tu-95 are not so old as you think. Their equipment is a crap ofcourse, but it will be changed in a few years.

  • Not true. The equipment is being always updated so it is up-to-date.

  • i wonder what would happen if two communist countries such as Russia and China had a mass fall out and war was the fate. who would win ??

  • FYI Russia is not a communist country.

  • FYI denial

  • These Tu-95s "bears" with turboprop engine actually are more modern than american b-52

  • Not really... both are very old airframes that have been updated continuously, but I do think the newest T-95s are much newer than the newest B-52's.

  • @Primorsky ROFLMAO!!! Yeah ok! What are you smoking?? I'll bet you think the Mig-15 is more advanced than the F-22 hahaha

  • @joshua81em

    They are more veratile than the B52 and can operate in far more difficult conditions, can stay airborne longer and easier to maintain. Fitted out with modern electronics and counter measures and used as launch platforms for cruise missiles they are a dealy threat that can hit targets thousands of miles ahead. Don't under estimate them, they are a real threat.

  • @tpsossff Wrong, sounds like the typical made-up BS I hear from Soviet fanboys. The Cold War is over and you LOST. Deal with it.

  • @joshua81em

    I have l lived the last twenty years just thirty miles from Edwards air base. I did not think we lost the cold war but I bow to your better knowledge. Like it or not the 95s can still pack a nasty punch as launch platforms. Don't be fooled by the fifties technology, like the B52 they have evolved. Unlike the B52 they can be dispersed to small airstrips and be maintained with minimum equipment and ground crew.

  • @joshua81em

    Re the cold war, to a certain extent it is still going on. We 'won' for political and economics reasons. Make no mistake, the Russians were every bit as capable of destroying our country several times over as we were theirs. In history manys wars and battles have been lost because people allowed national pride to fog the truth about the strength of the enemy. Do not underestimate the Russians, militarily they are stronger than many imagine.

  • @tpsossff The "reasons" the USA won do not matter and the post-Cold War Russian military is still mired in many problems that even the Russians admit. The B-52 is still a more capable platform than the Tu-95 which is unlikely to change.

  • @joshua81em

    I on;y mentioned the reasons because another poster made the connection. You are quite right about the problems .... when the USSR collapsed they could not even account for all nuclear weapons and still can't. That is frightening. But while they are capable of some wonderful aircraft they are held back by lack of good old fashioned capitalist management skills.

  • @joshua81em

    But I stick by my sentiments about the plane. A good analogy would be their space program. Based on hardware developped by Sergei Korelev in the 50s the relatively cheap and very reliable kit has been invaluable in supplying the ISS for years. The point I am making is that high-tech is not necessarily better and, as the shuttle so tragicly demonstrated, can bring its own set of problems.

  • @tpsossff Still the B-52 is clearly superior and that is what this video is about. Nice try changing the subject.

  • @joshua81em

    Not changing subject, just explaining why it is not necessarily superior. It fits its modern day role in a cruise missile platform varient it is well capable of striking targets across the US and Europe. As an AWAC can detect missile launches. In maritime roll search for subs. B52 could do these things and they are equally as deadly which makes the question of which of these icons to our ability to destroy each other somewhat irrelevant. :)

  • @Primorsky LOLOLOL....your a funny guy Ivan. ,The b-52 is the finest bomber in the world, you are outside of your mind its a fuckin TURBOPROP LMAO!!!!

  • @BeLikeWater1000 Lool, the Tu-95 is really more modern than B-52. Turboprops are evolved from jet engines ;) ... simply it's a jet engine powering also a prop creating a air flow over the engines.

  • @teknobug It is cheaper, but fighting properties of the Tu-95 is very high.

  • Can you imagine if the russian make their cockpits in the state of art installing Active Matrix Color Multi-Function Liquid Cristal Displays ? The old Bear wouldn't be the perfect blend of past with the future ?

  • @LeoAndRas Russian modernize these aircraft. They will fly up to 2020.

  • Russians sold Alaska to US for roughly

    14 million dollars back in the day; BUT imagine how much further RUssia would stretch

  • i want his hat :)

  • Zzz, someone's been watching too much Borat.

  • I think that Bush don't know where to find Russia on the map at all. USA allready trembeled when Russian war machine was rolling so you better stop thinking like your president, or better, START thinking.

  • ya lets be honest here usa is not trembling in fear niether is russia. both sides use the other to get new toys. if they go to war we all die if not from the bombing then the fallout gets us. and as much as I love the USA Bush is a first class idiot.

  • I was saying for back then. And i know that if the war brakes out there will be probblems for whole world.

    But what i hate the most are short sited americans posting idiotic coments. They still critisize Russia but they are too stupid to see that they are going the same way as former CCCP.

  • ya but you go to the f22 videos and you people posting anti american stuff. unfortunatly my friend stupidity is everywhere. think of the whole thing as a pedulum. a country goes to one extreme and then another. hopefully things will start back the other way. for all paries involved.

  • @coldshot357 Looks whos king of the usa now!! LOL A KENYAN!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAHAHAHAHAHA oh man has that usa ever went down the tubes, fuck me man!

    And nobody said a word while the country was travelling through the tubes into the sewer... oh well!

  • WOW, I see the guy with a map, is he in the 80's?

  • Russia and USA should unite vs f***ing China!

  • Russia and USA should unite vs f***ing China!

  • Russians still drink wodka:)

  • This thing makes so much noise,that even American submarine crews pick up their noise.Talk about element of surprise,chuckle chuckle.

  • they are turboprops...

  • wow that is one old tu-95 I'm surprised it's still in the air

  • not that old. All 95s still in service were built in the 80s or 90s.

  • If everythin is ok in US, as this movie try to show, then why was required to make this movie?

  • Sorry, i place comment in wrog place.

  • cus russia should not fly bombers in the air space of other nations unless permitted to do so or unles war is declared. that is shear commonsence!

  • They don't normally. In this case, they came within a close 50km, but didn't penetrate.

  • @draculapw Really? Why can the USA do it then? That doesnt make sense to me. It actually looks to me like the USA set a prescendant and now its legitimate for ANY country on earth to fly bombers next to other peoples borders! And if they got nukes, slap a few in its belly for the ride!

    In the modern world, "Do as i say, not as i do" no longer applies, its outdated, hypocritical, and just a plain old laughing matter

    “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" seems to make mroe sense

  • @mattmatt115 The United States hasn't flown nuclear-armed strategic bomber patrols since the round-the-clock deterrent flights were ordered to stand down after the dissolusion of the Soviet Union in 1991. We're STILL intercepting Tu-95s off the Alaskan coast to this day. The USAF even made a big deal about it when an F-22A Raptor intercepted a Bear for the first time.

  • @JonnyCrash Really? What about your P3 Orions? What about the E3 Sentry? What about your Fighters? As far as i know, China and Russia still intercept USAF planes to this day, penetrating their airspaces? What sort of propaganda your trying to perpetuate here? Your sending it to the wrong guy, i'll tell ya that much!

  • @mattmatt115 Pay attention when you reply. I said that the United States hasn't flown nuclear armed flights over Russian air space since the end of the Cold War in 1991. There's a huge difference between a B-52 carrying nukes (or a Tu-95) and an E-3, buddy. Any country with capable aircraft is going to fly reconaissance on it's neighbors. It's called intelligence gathering. We'd be hearing about it from the U.N. and the Commonwealth of Independent States were it contrary to international laws.

  • @JonnyCrash So your suggesting that you have insider knowledge, perhaps you fly abord the Tu-95 and have seen them armed with nuclear missiles recently? Hmm i find that hard to believe.

    So, then, considering the Tu-95 is equipped with long range search radomes, and can be kitted for photo recce, ELINT recce, sounds to me almost like they are taking notes on us. Sounds alot like what WE DO TOO! So in all reality, this entire conversation is a NONE ISSUE!!!

  • hehe..STOP building ur USA bases in europe and ur bloody radar systems...and Russia will stop flying bombers over the world...easy as that...thats a simple russian response..

    peace

  • Indeed. The US and EU seem to think it is fine to keep creeping all of this junk up on Russia, and they should just sit back and do nothing. What if things were turned around? What if Russia wanted to put bases and radar and everythingelse in Cuba?  Oh wait...the US wasn't cool with that one.

  • NELHAOTEC..nice one mate..i agree with u!

  • If the situation were EXACTLY reversed, I doubt the US would be as self-controlled as Russia has been about encroachment and threatening overtures. I feel the US would be making an ever bigger fuss. NELHAOTEC is spot on in his asessment. Who can blame a antion for protecting its interests? Bravo NELHAOTEC!

  • The Russians have lost the technological war against China.USA is way ahead of them both, i mean she's the only one with stealth tech.

    USA has the tech, China the men and Russia has the old tanks, planes and weapons produced in lage numbers.

  • There r stealth detecting radar now.. But not all countries possess them.

  • ha good one, the American army lost pride in its planes because a Russian air defences shot them down (those planes were the most stealthiest they had), Russia has the strongest bombs, oh yeah and nuclear missiles cant hit Russia because of their ballistic system, USA has none of that

  • China is weak-ass and would be defeated by both USA and Russia. China didn't beat Russia in Tech. We have Mig-31s and Su-30s, Tu-160s and Tu-22M3s. The Chinese still produce crappy versions of Tu-16 and Mig-19.

  • can you imagine- Mig 31 has a radar range of 400 km! 400 !! talk about F-22s...

  • Whats cool about Mig-31 is its like a mini-AWACS. The newest versions of ZASLON radar can track 20-30 targets and fire on like 10 or 15 simultaneously. Often, the Mig doesn't have enough missiles of its own or other fighters like SU-27 are in a better attack position, so the Mig's WSO can actually use the Mig-31's electronic systems to fire the other planes' missiles at targets it locates and designates itself. That way, 4 fighters working together are as effective as 7-9 working as normal.

  • Say what you will, but Russia is back...with a vengeance. Whether you view that as a good thing or not, they are not a force to be taken lightly. All the rhetoric and name calling in the world will not change that.

  • true i hope hillary clinton is not elected we need another REAGAN and i would do everything in my power to make india a strategic partner because those dudes can fly a plane

  • Very much agreed with you there. Clinton is a disaster of epic proportions just waiting and poised to happen on every level and in every catergory.

  • Hillary really sucks. But so does reagan. He was one of the worst presidents this country ever had. I don't like either of them. India is important, but i think they may be closer to russia at this point. Not sure though

  • well, it will be them vs NATO... and yes, they have stealth, but seriously... NATO! the RAF, USAF, the SAS, Marines, Navy, the british ships... and thats just 2 countries... it would not be wise of them to start ww3. Tho, they would be strong, but against Germany, britain and the us, i would doubt they would win. Remember wwII, germany fighting a 2 front war against the us and britain, and then russia. they pushed russia back into there own country. its almost a 3rd world country now. O well :D

  • That is a typical Russian tactic. There were not pushed back so much as they fell back to weaken German forces, and to my recolection...it worked.

  • ya... your right, but they wouldnt of done it by themself, the british and the americans pushed them out of france, and all the way back to berlin... another thing was i heard since they were short on weapons, they had one guy hold the gun, and another one hold the clip... is this actually true cause it sounds ironic when SOME... not all... some russians talk about there powerfull nation. again... some of them, not all

  • Some of the bloodiest battles were fought in Russia. I'm not sure ANYONE could have done it themselves, without support via manpower and/or equipment. That is why it was a World War. The reason America could offer such things is that it the mainland was far away from the main theatres of war and with the exception of Pearl Harbour, was unscathed and so the military-industrial complex and civilian infrastructure could pump out the needed supplies and manpower. All of the allies deserve thanks.

  • i agree, but still, we deserved pearl harbour, regardless of the fact that it was wrong. Our country was in japan "taking control" of them (we really were not) it anoyes me that MOST americans beleive that we should solve all of the worlds problems... i believe their are good AND bad reasons for any wars. If iraq asked us to help them, then i would say okay, but since they didnt ask, thats where i wonder and ponder the reasons for entering there country. (haha, sorry about spelling)

  • The Soviet Union also pushed the Nazis back to Germany and Berlin, remember? Germany was divided after that.

  • The United States also had help. The allies helped each other, no one went at it totally alone.

  • I seriously doubt there is any interest at all in starting WWIII by Russia. I meant they are back closer to their former status in the world as compared to the dark days of the post-Soviet collapse of the 90s. Yes, that means militarily also, so they may be preparing for the worst, but certainly not looking for it.

  • so what is russia saying with all of these flights "we sold a bunch of oil" so look out we are gonna knock the dust off of these bombers i know the U.S.NAVY intercepted one on2-11-08 it's getting serious now!!!

  • 1z1q

    They are just carring out out exercises. Thats all.

  • the b-2 spirit is the baddest in town!

  • believe or not the bear is back

  • > We defeated them once.

    You and your friends, yeah?

  • "Dont you know you fool, you never can win Use your mentality, wake up to reality"

  • bwahahahahahahah u can only win those araps in flip-flops, and even they make u big troubles :D

  • old is gold...

  • The airplanes are lovely and nice but why do you guys go close to Japanese and Canadian airspaces? ..and after that one of the Russian pilots says "They (Japanese) jets tried to provoke us" -YOU provoked them!

    Anyways, I have respect for russian airplanes, but when they are not attached to politicans and generals.

  • Guys are just having some fun :D

  • nice vid but is better if you put on it enlish or spanish Subtitles

  • US and Nato is far behind Russia in missile technology though. USA has bought russian weapons before like SS-N-22 Sunburn and SAM system called S-300s so they can improve and upgrade on their own weapons and defence systems. Russia also helped NASA for their rocket booster parts which are found to be much stronger than the ones they got. Also US tried to steal designs and plans of the Shkval supercavitating torpedo developed by the Russian Navy.

  • wow looks like russiansand amricans hate each other...theres only one way tosettle this...WAR!!!!!

  • noooo, lol im American but my mothers side of the family is Russian, that would suck :)

  • yepp,that WOULD SUCK!!!

  • and I think u have pubes

  • How many here knew that Russian strategic bomber fleet is larger and more modern than that of USA? That's right. check out numbers for yourself if you do not believe me. and WAY faster, and more bombload.

  • i dont get it russian bomber look loke transport aircraft but americans look like UFO's

  • wisdom is like a feather without a cow, do not forget to bring your book, but grass is on our way without the mayonaise.

  • Russian Strategic Bombers: The '78 Camaro of military aviation. It's funny to think that they'd get shot down before even picking up our planes on radar.

  • Everyone who has brain easily gets it. Older recon plane has better radar than any perspective fighter. Bear also has a speed of commercial jet airliner and global range. Any US interceptor has shorter range than Bears' cruise missiles it is intended to launch stand-off.

  • I love cheese

  • random...

  • I <3 You...

  • cheese is good

  • bring it on asshole. let your USA do the first shot!

  • USA Have the sexual capabilities and ambitions of a bisexual hamster :)

  • xo4ew mira gotovjsja k vojne spi spokojno ote4estvo

  • Very stupid. Please stop war...

  • I'm gay.

  • omg i love you