Added: 1 year ago
From: ancienthebreworg
Views: 3,889
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,965)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL! I'm rolling in my Eschatology.

  • Oh that's great!

    My all time favorite though is: The KJV, if it was good enough for the Apostle Paul, it's good enough for me.

  • Yea, some people teach that God is so stupid he cant speak English. Next they'll want God to present his green card.

  • It always seems like a WAR is caused over religion, that is WHY I don't study the bible because it has been changed and if you change on smAll word it can make it mean something different. NOW WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO STUDY AND BELIEVE In THAT WHICH IS NOT ACCURATE? By the way I am spiritual no specific religion

  • @shadyev992 The AV1611 is authoritative.

    As calciumboy wrote succinctly, "Obviously, Jesus knows ALL languages and can put His word in English if He wants to. And the fact that some words were first used the KJB doesn't mean you need Hebrew/Greek dictionaries to define them. The Bible is self-defining. Read Riplinger's books 'The Language of The King James Bible' and 'In Awe of Thy Word.'"

    Unlike the AV1611, the wretched "modern versions" derive from the great whore's corrupt Codex Vaticanus.

  • @alexmcginness Why don't you put up 2 or 3 then email me the large list of errors you have, please

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness You still miss the point, swine.

    While you don't understand semantics or the elementary principles of hermeneutics in any language, you theorize about errors in the King James Bible which were disproven in the XIX Century by Burgon, Scrivener, John Eadie, et alia., as Edward Hills demonstrated decades ago.

    As boggymark1 put it so succinctly, "You can't even read Greek OR HEBREW."

    When (if ever) did you come under the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?

  • @alexmcginness Can I get a list of these errors? thanks

  • @alexmcginness

    As wasnt4me put it so succinctly, "I am thankful [toward] King James for making the...English bible available to the common man. I am not thankful for the catholics evil actions towards not just the king, but people in general through the inquisition. These demons actually tried to make people be licensed first before reading god's word. They burned books and relied on suppressing the truth...They serve the doctrine of demons."

  • @alexmcginness

    Witless obscurantists like you are never amusing for very long. You can relax now, however, since I don't intend or desire to make sport of your lack of intellect and common sense, your deficiency in valid hermeneutic methodology, or your profound ignorance of sound Biblical doctrine and the English, Greek, and Hebrew languages. On the other hand, I have not been able to prevent you from exposing them along with your contempt for the preaching of the Gospel.

  • @alexmcginness

    "Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God" (John 3:3).

    "A good man obtaineth favour of the LORD: but a man of wicked devices will he condemn" (Proverbs 12:2).

    While I have one and only one YouTube account as an irrefutable matter of fact, it is painfully obvious that you are utterly incompetent ot prove an error anywhere in the King James Bible

  • @alexmess If you weren't so pathetic, you would almost be funny!!!

    Who in his right mind would ever try "to pry into the private lives" of any of you Pharisaical legalists headed for hell because you openly reject and deny the clear Scriptural text of the King James Bible in the lingua franca of the world today??

    The Lord Jesus Christ said, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life" (Joh 3:16).

  • @alexmcginness No. you are wrong again.

    While you lend new meaning to the term "slow learner," you are too pathetic to be funny in any language. You are a poor attempt at a joke even for a heretic.

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "Unregenerate Pharisees like you jesuitical denominationalists who push popish cultism as though it were the latest designer drug are as passe as they are lost. That is to say totally."

    Totally illiterate in Greek and Hebrew, you have NEVER proven an error in the AV1611.

  • @alexmcginess

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "it is axiomatically obvious that lost and blind men (e.g., you) never see anything."

    The Lord Jesus Christ said, "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God" (John 3:17ff).

    Lost and blind, the unregenerate are dead in their sins.

  • @alexmcginess You obscene obscurantists CANNOT EVEN READ GREEK AND HEBREW AT ALL!

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "You're as phony as a three-dollar bill (US).

    "A 'marginal note' is not, never was, and won't become the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD.

    "In English, they are commonly called the King James Bible."

    "How long wilt thou speak these things? and how long shall the words of thy mouth be like a strong wind? Doth God pervert judgment? or doth the Almighty pervert justice?" (Job 8:2ff).

  • @alexmcginness

    God has preserved the Holy Bible in its entirety, but the appeals to the absent "original autographs" are nothing more than a semantic boondoggle favored by popish Romanists and their toadies. Those manuscripts are irrelevant today because the text of the Tanakh and New Testament has already been preserved.

    Moreover, the Biblical text of the King James Bible, verbally inerrant in English today, is the same as it was in 1611 as a matter of historical fact.

  • @alexmcginness

    As NewVinland wrote, "You're just like the Catholics who used to have the priests lock up the Bible all for themselves to interpret for people. The same thing is going on today with people telling us that they know the original languages and we need them to interpret it for us. Then they introduce false doctrines. Even the Jehovah's Witnesses use the 'read the Greek' argument. It just doesn't work. ."

    When--if ever--were you convinced that you are a lost sinner bound for hell?

  • It is axiomatically obvious, however, that lost and blind men (e.g., you) never see anything.

    The Lord Jesus Christ said, "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God" (John 3:17ff).

    When were you ever convinced that you are a lost sinner bound for hell?

  • @LibertyLuvr1969

    Neither the Hegelian Dialectic, nor cheap wine and thin round crackers, nor religion, nor debate ever saved anyone.

    Believe the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ today, and be saved by grace through faith in Him, the Son of God, alone.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmess No.

    As boggymark1 wrote, "Your worldly, carnal, and devilish inability to perceive and interpret the Holy Scriptures in every language known to man is the direct result of rejecting the free gift of salvation by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone as the King James Bible accurately instructs."

    "For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God" (Romans 10:3).

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness Try learning how to write something truthful in English even if that requires extensive remedial education.

    While your ilk of unregenerate toadies and atheists just like White-heads tend to prefer the "hit-and-run" tactics of drunk drivers, heretical fools, and gutless apostates, none of them can manage to mount a cogent argument Sola Scriptura for their irrational MMM-onlyism (Multiple Modern Mistranslations-onlyism) which would blasphemously make God the author of confusion.

  • @alexmcginness

    As boggymark1 put it so succinctly, "...foolish heretics like you ought to keep their vile, ignorant mouths shut especially when they are so intellectually deficient that they cannot even count to (2) two..."

    When--if ever--did you come under the conviction that you are lost sinner on your way to hell?

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness The great whore is Rome.

    As edwardpf123 wrote, "The baptism spoken of in Mark 16:15 is referring to spiritual baptism (1Cor.12:13) not water baptism. Note that in the second part of that verse it simply refers to not believing, not baptism.

    "Yes, there was a different Gospel preached while Christ was on earth, the Gospel of the Kingdom. But it was always by faith one was saved. Now, it is faith in the risen saviour. Faith in what God said, was always the critera for salvation."

  • @LibertyLuvr1969 Again, I could hardly care less about the "private life" of a bore like you.

    Unlike me, you haven't even professed salvation by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone here so that there is no point in your posing as Christian anywhere, particularly around someone who can expose your trivial popish poppycock in a New York minute or less, so to speak.

    Believe the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ today, and be saved by grace through faith in Him. the Son of God, alone.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmess No, you can't count past one.

    As jmblair24 wrote “Are you kidding me, Greek manuscripts? There are Greek manuscripts galore, including the corrupted manuscripts that the Roman Catholic religion uses. I do not buy the line that the inerrant word of God is found only in the originals--which nobody has. The Authorized King James text has faithfully served the body of Christ for...400 years."

    When--if ever--did you come under the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?

  • @LibertyLuvr1969 I could hardly care less about your "private life" which I do presume is as boring as your posts.

    On the other hand, the Lord Jesus Chist said, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved" (John 3:16ff).

    Rome is still the Mother of Harlots and Abominations, however.

  • @LibertyLuvr1969

    While Grammar in any language and elementary logic routinely espape Alexandrian cultists who don't know what the inerrant Holy Scriptures are today in any language as well as your ilk of unregenerate historical ignoramuses who like to oppose the King James Bible, when--if ever--did you come under the the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?

  • @LibertyLuvr1969

    As RainhadoCanto4 wrote succinctly, "Praise God William Tyndale's prayer while being martyred by the Roman Catholic Church was answered!"

    Rome is the great whore according to Revelation 17 and 18.

    "And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration" (Rev.17:6).

    "And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth" (Rev. 17:18).

  • Comment removed

  • @LibertyLuvr1969 I know...I just have fun with them and I warn others as to their incessant Bullshit. Its funny to watch.

  • Comment removed

  • @jjpetkusiii just more copy and paste BLA BLA BLA....Satan get behind us.

  • @alexmess You still miss the point, klutz.

    As Providential1611 wrote, "Catholicism...LITERALLY cut off [men's] heads, limbs, tongues, babies out of pregnant women, etc. Rome hates the King James Bible because it is OF GOD and exposes Rome for the cult it is. The Bible teaches us not to walk with heretics anyway, but to expose, mark, note and shun them. What you view as cultic and sectarian is simply Biblical obedience to be separate from idolaters, greedy people and peddlers of another Gospel."

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness

    Try learn how to write cogent English someday in the event that you are ever able to find someone who teaches you to read and count past one.

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "At some future date if you ever happen to have a sincere question about sound Biblical doctrine or valid hermeneutic methodology, feel free to send a Personal Message to my one and only YouTube account."

  • Comment removed

  • CORRECTION: Your depraved inability to perceive and interpret the Holy Scriptures is the direct result of denying and rejecting salvation by grace through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone as the King James Bible instructs.

    "For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ" (Jude 1:4).

    Learn to read English in context.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexcess LOL!

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "By the way, try learning how to spell since it might make your heretical claptrap somewhat less offensive on its face, but don't flatter yourself since I repeatedly urged you to believe the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ today, and be saved by grace through faith in Him, the Son of God, alone. Your blood won't be on my hands at the judgement seat of Christ in any case...you failed again to prove any error, omission or addition in the King James Bible."

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness Since you don't know what the inerrant Holy Scriptures are in any language, I'm not surprised that you are an unregenerate Campbellite heretic who can't read any Koine Greek or Biblical Hebrew.

    Neither is boggymark1 by the way, and as he put it so succinctly, "Hey, moron, you don't even know my name--let alone who I am by God's grace..."

    Seek extensive remedial education promptly from a team of tutors who are expert in reading comprension for retardates who can't count past one.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "Those Alexandrian cultists like you who like your tedious links may in fact prefer the works of Madame Helena Blavatsky, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, Dean Koontz, Inigo de Loyola, Mao Tse Tung, and Josef Ratzinger, a. k. a. Pontifex Maximus Benedictus XVI.

    "For the English-speaking peoples, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD. .as an irrefutable matter of historical fact."

    Learn how to read English in context.

  • Comment removed

  • @ancienthebreworg Once again, your inability to perceive and interpret does not constitute a error in any translation.

    Your assertions merely recapitulate the bias of Wescott, Hort, and some of the more-offbeat White-heads (devotees of James White) who maintain that no perfect translation is possible. I tell you without fear of contradiction that such a view is utter nonsence, and it contradicts both logic and common sense. Personally, I was translating accurately before I was four-years-old. 

  • @jjpetkusiii Yes, I reject Sola Scriptura and so do you. No translator could ever translate the Bible without the assistance of the Jews and their dictionaries and lexicons as a language cannot be learned by the source text alone. Other resources are required to learn the language. Therefore, anyone who reads an English Bible is by extension relying on extra-Biblical sources.

  • @ancienthebreworg

    Feel free to speak erroneously for yourself because I do not in any way share a clearly heretical rejection of the sound Biblical doctine of Scriptural preservation in its entiretly by the LORD.

    "And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God" (Luke 4:4).

    The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away" (Mark 13:31).

    The AV1611 is the Holy Scriptures in English.

  • "Poichè tutti hanno peccato, e son privi della gloria di Dio" (Romani 3:23).

    "Perciocchè Iddio ha tanto amato il mondo, ch’egli ha dato il suo unigenito Figliuolo, acciocchè chiunque crede in lui non perisca, ma abbia vita eterna" (Giovanni 3:16). ).

    "Perciocchè voi siete salvati per la grazia, mediante la fede, e ciò non è da voi, è il dono di Dio. Non per opere, acciocchè niuno si glorii" (Efesini 2:8-9).

    If you knew English, you could read this in the King James Bible at John 3:16 et al.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness Of course, you can't even read Koine Greek or Biblical Hebrew at all while you openly deny and mock Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide in English.

    "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8).

    Learn to read English, pazzo.

    When--if ever--did you come under the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness

    Since you are still unregenerate by your own admission, one may conclude, of course, that you will never enter the "kingdom" at any date.

    You, of course, are illiterate in Koine Greek and Biblical Hebrew--which is par for the course among lost and blind Campbellites--and you are therefore incompetent to prove any assertion of errors in the King James Bible.

    Salvation is of the LORD by grace through faith in the Son of God alone according to the Holy Scriptures in any language.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • As boggymark1 wrote, "Not only couldn’t a lost and blind Pharisee like you tell a New Testament church from a Hare Krishna Ashram, but you are also accursed..."

    "For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ" (Jude 1:4).

    "For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ" (John 1:17).

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmess

    Your constant whining coupled to your prolix jesuitical poppycock repeatedly indicated the false sense of nostalgia that Lot's wife had for Sodom as she turned into a pillar of salt.

    Jesus answered and said unto him, "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God" (John 3:3).

    "A good man obtaineth favour of the LORD: but a man of wicked devices will he condemn" (Proverbs 12:2).

    None of your ilk ever proved an error in the AV1611.

  • @alexmcginness No, pazzo, ma tu sei una mangia cake che sa meno di niente. "Poichè tutti hanno peccato, e son privi della gloria di Dio" (Romani 3:23).

    "Perciocchè Iddio ha tanto amato il mondo, ch’egli ha dato il suo unigenito Figliuolo, acciocchè chiunque crede in lui non perisca, ma abbia vita eterna" (Giovanni 3:16). ).

    "Perciocchè voi siete salvati per la grazia, mediante la fede, e ciò non è da voi, è il dono di Dio. Non per opere, acciocchè niuno si glorii" (Efesini 2:8-9).

  • @alexmcginness ROFLOL!

    Not only couldn’t a lost and blind Pharisee like you tell a New Testament church from a Hare Krishna Ashram, but you are also accursed according to the Holy Scriptures.

    The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it" (John 8:44).

  • Comment removed

  • Once again, you and your slanderous post are a disgrace while you have NEVER proven any of your totally bogus premises of 'errors' in the King James Bible.

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "Seek extensive remedial education promptly..."

    You should learn to read English in context like a rational adult.

  • Circa 350 AD, the Holy Scriptures were transated into Gothic by Ulfilas, and in the regions around Constantinople the translation of Jerome was never used by the speakers of Koine Greek. In the IX Century, the first rendering of the Holy Bible into the Slavic languages was the result of the efforts of Cyril and Methodios whose labors have had a wider and more lasting impact than Jerome's.

    The King James Bible is the perfect translation of the Holy Scriptures into English.

  • Just as the Textus Receptus is the authoritative New Testament in Koine Greek while the Masoretic Text is the correct Tanakh in the Hebrew language, so the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD in the lingua franca of our contemporary world.

    No book in any language has been more widely read than the AV1611 in all of human history to this day.

    "The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times" (Psalm 12:6).

  • @alexmcginness

    Unlike you, I never claimed that the King James Bible was not the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, nor am I a Pharisaical legalist who openly mocks and denies Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura as you do.

    The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."

    When – if ever – did you come under the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness

    Yes, Rome is the Mother of Harlots and Abominations according to Revelation 17, but obviously that is no problem for you.

    The Lord Jesus Christ also said, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life" (John 3:16).

    When did you ever write a valid premise in English--or in any language?

    "For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth" (Romans 10:4).

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness

    Most Vatican shills are not as idiosyncatic as you (or as blatantly insincere) although boggymark1 already gave you the answer to your inquiry about the Gospel.

    When--if ever-did you come under the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?

  • @alexmcginness ROFLOL!

    First of all, a lost and blind Pharisee like you couldn't tell a New Testament church from a Hare Krishna Ashram.

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "Of course, you can't even read Koine Greek or Biblical Hebrew at all while you openly deny and mock Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide in English."

    "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8).

    Learn to read English, pazzo.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness Are you kidding me--or are you still trying to delude yourself into following along your Pharisaical cul-de-sac into its ultimate bottomless pit??

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "Learn to read.

    "At some future date if you ever happen to have a sincere question about sound Biblical doctrine or valid hermeneutic methodology, feel free to send a Personal Message to my one and only YouTube account."

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness Unlike you, boggymark1 was right.

    When--if ever--did you come under the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?

    As RainhadoCanto4 put it so succinctly, "This is hilarious!! I guess you have run out of 'legitimate' reasons for bashing the King James Bible!! Now you go after those who believe in it for the manner in which they express themselves!

    "Paranoia setting in? I have no doubt they also speak more intelligibly!!"

  • @ancienthebreworg

    Look directly in a well-lit mirror, mein sehr dummes Spatzenhirn, and you will see such a deceptive cultist unless your eyes like your defiled conscience have already failed you.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexcess

    No, you are wrong again, but in the process today, please don't forget to take notice of the fact that you are a lost and blind Pharisee according the Holy Bible who doesn't even know what the Holy Scriptures are in his native language while you are on your way to hell without Christ, and without hope.

    [Galatians 1:8] "As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed."

  • @boggymark1 Great...What is the true Gospel then?

  • @alexmcguiness Of course, you and your ilk of legalistic infidels cannot tell a New Testament church from a Hare Krishna Ashram, and salvation is of the LORD by grace through faith in the Son of God alone according to the Holy Scriptures in any language.

    In English for your information, the Holy Scriptures are commonly called the King James Bible (Authorized Version).

    Thanks for asking.

  • @alexmcginness Obviously, you miss the point, pazzo.

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "A solipsistic infidel like you wouldn't know the truth about anything in any language including straightforward English if it bit your faithless lips as they were poised to kiss the pope's foot.

    "For the English-speaking peoples, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact."

  • You can't even read Greek or Hebrew, but to put it precisely you are asserting that there are mistranslations in the AV1611 because of objections raised by revisionists who assume a-priori that no translation is ever perfect.

    That is not a tenable position as far as I am concerned, and many bilingual and multilingual men and women over the years have reject the presumption that the King James Bible has errors because of their own studies. I am one of them. and Rome is still the great whore.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness No, unlike you, I am not a popish Romanist, who doesn't even know the difference between Rome, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations according to Revelation 17, and the church for which the Lord Jesus Christ, the Rock of my Salvation, gave His very life.

    You don't even know what the inerrant Holy Scriptures are in any language; neither does any popish toady and Vatican kvetch like you.

    In English, by the way, the King James Bible is the Holy Scirptures, preserved by the LORD.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness You still miss the point.

    Since popish Romanism is polytheistic, the fictitious Mary Co-Mediatrix , her Caesar-Pope Idol Shepherd Pontifex Maximus Benedictus XVI, the other Gesu Bambino, Fatima, et alia, are all objects of worship to the lost heathens deluded by Rome, the great whore

    What you want to speculate about is your business, but do yourself a favor and try to distinguish between a guess, i.e. yours when you fantasize about me, and a sound Biblical doctrine.

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness

    As jjpetkusiii put it, "...you got nothing but Biblical illiteracy, denial of Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide, and Rome, the great whore, whose unregenerate shill you are. Your twisted eisegeses and wicked miscontstruction of 1John 5 have already been refuted here and elsewhere by edwardpf123, boggymark1, KingJamesBible and me. Other popery of yours has been debunked by a number of regenerated believers in the Lord Jesus Christ."

  • @alexmcginness

    As boggymark1 wrote, "Wescott and Hort were occultists with marked popish Romanist leanings, and many contemporary MMM-onlies (adherents of Multiple Modern Mistranslations-onlyism) have severe psychological problems stemming from long-standing ritual abuse and doping. Sometimes their manifest apostate folly and blatant heresies are just the tip of the iceberg of almost unspeakable corruption. It is hardly surprising that such wretches would be attracted to Alexandrian cultism."

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @alexmcginness

    As boggymark1 wrote, "some scribblers like you are just stupid enough that they are altogether unaware of their own inveterate hypocrisy according to the Holy Scriptures in any language, but since you don't know any Hebrew or Greek at all, any claim on your part that they are not perfectly translated from the Old Testament or the New Testament from the 'original languages' in the King James Bible is just as preposterous as the rest of the rubbish that you posted on...this video."

  • @alexmcginness

    As RainhadoCanto4 put it "This is hilarious!! I guess you have run out of 'legitimate' reasons for bashing the King James Bible!! Now you go after those who believe in it for the manner in which they express themselves!

    "Paranoia setting in? I have no doubt they also speak more intelligibly!!

    "A good man obtaineth favour of the LORD: but a man of wicked devices will he condemn.

    [Proverbs 12:2].

    When did you ever write a valid premise in English--or any other language?

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more