I think your wrong. On one episode of The Simpsons Lisa had a rock that keeps Tigers away. Homer made the observation that there were no Tigers around, therefore the rock worked. You should do more research before you post a video.
Oh I hear this one all the time in just average conversations with people. "I was at a house with a cat, later that day I had trouble breathing therefore it was the cat." or one from a friend recently that bugs me to no end involves something called the Jesus door that a guy takes around on tours cause a pattern in the wood looks like the image of Jesus. He says "A woman touched that door and later that week she won a few thousdand dollars from the lotto." I don't know where to begin with him.
The cat example is a good example of an ambiguity. For instance, if the woman is allergic and picked up cat dander on her clothing, there's a causal mechanism that might validate her claim.
However, if there's no proposed mechanism, the fallacy stands!
I liked your video. I think it's very important to emphasize the massive and yet sometimes subtle difference between valid logical induction/deduction and invalid logical induction/deduction or 'Post hoc Ergo Propter hoc' which I think you did OK. For example, the KCA makes a great case for why logically deducting that material reality probably and likely MUST have come from immaterial reality is valid. It has withstood even the most brutal scrutiny.
i'm learning more on youtube. highschool should offer classes on how to think critically and use proper arguments, not emotional ones. sadly, i had to go to college just to learn what critical thinking was. the education system here has failed us :/
I think your wrong. On one episode of The Simpsons Lisa had a rock that keeps Tigers away. Homer made the observation that there were no Tigers around, therefore the rock worked. You should do more research before you post a video.
scottintulsa 3 years ago
Sun rises because the rooster sings
dariowortiz 3 years ago
Oh I hear this one all the time in just average conversations with people. "I was at a house with a cat, later that day I had trouble breathing therefore it was the cat." or one from a friend recently that bugs me to no end involves something called the Jesus door that a guy takes around on tours cause a pattern in the wood looks like the image of Jesus. He says "A woman touched that door and later that week she won a few thousdand dollars from the lotto." I don't know where to begin with him.
fractal420 3 years ago
Exactly!
The cat example is a good example of an ambiguity. For instance, if the woman is allergic and picked up cat dander on her clothing, there's a causal mechanism that might validate her claim.
However, if there's no proposed mechanism, the fallacy stands!
Thanks for the comment!
DrixDZanth 3 years ago
Subbed by recommendation. Good stuff, keep it up.
Skavar4000 3 years ago
Hi Jordan. Liked the vid, but I already subscribe. Good work.
RichardRoy2 3 years ago
I liked your video. I think it's very important to emphasize the massive and yet sometimes subtle difference between valid logical induction/deduction and invalid logical induction/deduction or 'Post hoc Ergo Propter hoc' which I think you did OK. For example, the KCA makes a great case for why logically deducting that material reality probably and likely MUST have come from immaterial reality is valid. It has withstood even the most brutal scrutiny.
friendlydiplomat 3 years ago
i'm learning more on youtube. highschool should offer classes on how to think critically and use proper arguments, not emotional ones. sadly, i had to go to college just to learn what critical thinking was. the education system here has failed us :/
LogicalSanity 3 years ago
Ignore the education system. It's bullshit. YouTube is the teacher, and the method is conversation.
SomethingSeaVlog 3 years ago