Added: 1 year ago
From: KeepItTrillBlog
Views: 6,743
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How is this "burning the waste" done. The science behind this.

  • Imagine oil is running out fast and shit countries are rich thanks to it, democracy is in trouble.

    This kind of reactor (cheap, safe yet powerful) would be a revolutionary move (for democracy, humanity, development, environment) in recent years!

  • There is a technology that is already proven that can burn this waste without reinventing the wheel. LFTR Thorium reactors.

  • @aloisgault LFTR is interesting, but it requires continuous reprocessing and it can't burn our stocks of trans-uranic waste unless it's a fast reactor

  • It has been a while now. Any updates?

  • @friendofyou

    news @

    terrapower(.)com

  • There is no such a thing as a "Molecule of Coal"... But ok Gates is no Chemistry engineer, he is a business man :D

    Go go Gates save the world with this.

  • He did word it poorly, but I think it was clear enough what he meant. He's clearly talking about an equal volume of nuclear fuel vs. coal.

  • @T0B0KKE

    Or a molecule of Uranium for that matter...but I thought bucky balls could be taken as molecules of carbon? :D

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more