@wassoncrane right after asking that question I found them. Yes, I also prefer the chemistry. The dissections are interesting but disconcerting to say the least. Thanks for the response.
In my opinion chemistry is much easier to understand once you understand physics. For instance, if you have no idea what voltage actually means or what a potential difference is, this lecture and this material will leave you scratching your head on a few points.
Coulomb's law refers to a force, which indeed is an inverse square law. But the electrostatic potential is inversely proportional to simply the distance. The equation he used was the energy equation, which involves the electristatic potential and thus what he wrote is correct.
One of the best professors I have ever been 'taught' by...between him and Dr. Diamond at Berkeley, and Dr. Lewin, there are some seriously good teachers out there, and I am all the more grateful for YouTube for having taken the initiative to help the Open Course Ware movement :)
One of the best professors I have ever been 'taught' by...between him and Dr. Diamond at Berkeley, and Dr. Lewin, there are some seriously good teachers out there, and I am all the more grateful for YouTube for having taken the initiative to help the Open Course Ware movement.
this is identical to my a-level quantum physics course!! How is this chemistry? Or is the fact that it is called solid state chemistry make it quantum physics?
@AlucardVonVilinus these are the basics of chemistry. you can't understand modern chemistry without proper understanding of certain models of the atom. This is actually fairly similar to a first semester chemistry course.
Around 40min the professor said some very funny thing, the accelaration of electron on a screen was actually the principle of how television works and when he said"I could watch science documentary"he looked at the students, but no one seemed to catch the humour, he shook his head helplessly and it was really cute!!!
It's incredible what this professor wrote, that the sum of the forces (coulomb and dynamic) for the planetary model is zero! Like to say that the sum of all forces on the Earth is zero! The Earth would move along a straight path!
I have a question, sometimes the teacher is doing equations that are for me quite exotic (for example 5:15, im on the last year in high school though) Do the students understand all of these equations, and if so which classes should you have read?
NICE. In 4 days I watched for lectures and learned so much more than I expected. I'm gonna have to review them again to catch what I didn't understand the first time through.
Some guy left a comment saying this stuff is elementary, all I have to say to that is that I have to start somewhere. I mean all I knew before this was the meaning of the letters of E=mc squared.
I knew that I knew some physics and chemistry but this put letters and figures to some stuff I already knew.
Brilliant. I am a high-school-teacher-to-be teaching Chemistry in Sweden, and his knowledge and rethorics are a true inspiration. Very good professor.
I've lectured before. It's easy to make a mistake or forget a step when you're on a time schedule. Try it sometime. It also serves as an archive and point of reference to continue from next lecture.
Comment removed
bababerry100 4 months ago
I learnt this in A-level Physics...
It's strange how these things overlap. Interesting though.
NinjatookmySOE 5 months ago
Watched a human dissection right before this. I MUCH prefer chemistry lectures.
wassoncrane 5 months ago
@wassoncrane where did you watch the human dissection at??
kritikalmass7 2 months ago
@kritikalmass7 Youtube, surprisingly. Just search for it
wassoncrane 2 months ago
@wassoncrane right after asking that question I found them. Yes, I also prefer the chemistry. The dissections are interesting but disconcerting to say the least. Thanks for the response.
kritikalmass7 2 months ago
@kritikalmass7 Of course! :)
wassoncrane 2 months ago
In my opinion chemistry is much easier to understand once you understand physics. For instance, if you have no idea what voltage actually means or what a potential difference is, this lecture and this material will leave you scratching your head on a few points.
tony225 6 months ago
Sorry, I thought he forgot it, I'm just so used to seeing it in r squared form.
jembishop 6 months ago
Oh dear. He forgot coulombs law! It is an inverse r SQUARED relationship. He just said it was proportional to r. Still a very good teacher.
jembishop 7 months ago
@jembishop inverse square is for coulombic force, he is referring to electrostatic potential energy which is r
flagman09 6 months ago
@jembishop
Coulomb's law refers to a force, which indeed is an inverse square law. But the electrostatic potential is inversely proportional to simply the distance. The equation he used was the energy equation, which involves the electristatic potential and thus what he wrote is correct.
Diemedes 4 months ago
Oh dear. He forgot coulombs law! It is an inverse r SQUARED relationship. He just said it was proportional to r.
jembishop 7 months ago
Comment removed
ephipi 9 months ago
did u hear a lol?
Rookycastle22 10 months ago
This teacher is really good !
brunoojusto 11 months ago
I am doing this in grade 9, and my teacher cant explain it for shit! this man is my only chance at a passing grade. Thank you for uploading!
Mathclassisevil 11 months ago
Thanks for uploading^_<)))))))) Let's get started!!!
flowewritharoma 11 months ago
Ohh... I just love CHEMISTRY... :D
MrChem303 1 year ago
One of the best professors I have ever been 'taught' by...between him and Dr. Diamond at Berkeley, and Dr. Lewin, there are some seriously good teachers out there, and I am all the more grateful for YouTube for having taken the initiative to help the Open Course Ware movement :)
recyclingismylife 1 year ago
One of the best professors I have ever been 'taught' by...between him and Dr. Diamond at Berkeley, and Dr. Lewin, there are some seriously good teachers out there, and I am all the more grateful for YouTube for having taken the initiative to help the Open Course Ware movement.
recyclingismylife 1 year ago
Clear and straight to the point! i wish all professors taught like this.
dude488 1 year ago
What year would one learn this at MIT? I don't understand their numbers.
Oreganoseasoner 1 year ago
this is identical to my a-level quantum physics course!! How is this chemistry? Or is the fact that it is called solid state chemistry make it quantum physics?
AlucardVonVilinus 1 year ago
@AlucardVonVilinus these are the basics of chemistry. you can't understand modern chemistry without proper understanding of certain models of the atom. This is actually fairly similar to a first semester chemistry course.
Oreganoseasoner 1 year ago
@Oreganoseasoner I did not know, I should have realised that as a physical science chemistry is closely related to physics and maths.
AlucardVonVilinus 1 year ago
is solid state chemistry same as solid state physics ?
0warrior4life 1 year ago
This a more awesome Indepth Recap of my HSC Physics Course, Awesome Lecture + Lecturer
rohannesburg 1 year ago
Around 40min the professor said some very funny thing, the accelaration of electron on a screen was actually the principle of how television works and when he said"I could watch science documentary"he looked at the students, but no one seemed to catch the humour, he shook his head helplessly and it was really cute!!!
Liebetraurig 1 year ago
and we are harvard so we know hahahahahahahahahahaha LMAO!!!!!!!!
yoyaya007 1 year ago
"This is very hot"
hahahaha
Reqrezentin 1 year ago
It's incredible what this professor wrote, that the sum of the forces (coulomb and dynamic) for the planetary model is zero! Like to say that the sum of all forces on the Earth is zero! The Earth would move along a straight path!
andaquesi63 1 year ago
@andaquesi63
Yeah, and Earth is a subatomic particle?? Last time I checked, the Earth doesn't have Coulombic forces.
Yoyocita2 1 year ago
love this professor. he talks fast, but very clear
samuel91222 1 year ago
I have a question, sometimes the teacher is doing equations that are for me quite exotic (for example 5:15, im on the last year in high school though) Do the students understand all of these equations, and if so which classes should you have read?
zaphr89 1 year ago
there is a sublime moment of deus en machina 40:40
recyclingismylife 1 year ago
NICE. In 4 days I watched for lectures and learned so much more than I expected. I'm gonna have to review them again to catch what I didn't understand the first time through.
Some guy left a comment saying this stuff is elementary, all I have to say to that is that I have to start somewhere. I mean all I knew before this was the meaning of the letters of E=mc squared.
I knew that I knew some physics and chemistry but this put letters and figures to some stuff I already knew.
Kraized 1 year ago 2
Verry haat. LOL I love it.
gayglue 1 year ago
is this from the '60's... this is very very elementary!
ramsesrccl 1 year ago
I still can't get over this stuff, the secrets of matter and chemistry for free on the internet. What an age to be alive!
discordandruin 1 year ago 2
@discordandruin I am amazed by how easily information is accessed. And, at the same time, I can't believe there's still so much ignorance.
Oreganoseasoner 1 year ago
wow i watched 10 minutes of this i didnt understand a single thing but i felt like i learned something new :]
SunDaygoPinoy 1 year ago
molecular nuclear fusion will save the world!
JonThm 1 year ago
can someone please make a animation for the elections jumping up and down getting excited.
puretroubleman 1 year ago
see lecture notes for details
puretroubleman 1 year ago
Brilliant. I am a high-school-teacher-to-be teaching Chemistry in Sweden, and his knowledge and rethorics are a true inspiration. Very good professor.
metallmattias 1 year ago
I like how physics is used in this lecture.
polos505 1 year ago
this guy is a great teacher.
MP15aug 2 years ago 2
Calculus, Physics and Chemistry all in one. Beautiful.
Mattprole 2 years ago 4
Excellent lectures. Thank you.
izadk 2 years ago 4
Joseph Fraunhofer - doesn't he deserve to be mentioned?
imac50000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mit sucks. I know as much as the teacher, if not even more and i study at FEUP in Porto-Portugal.
The best Engineer' University in Europe
lusomanada 2 years ago
Comment removed
zaphr89 1 year ago
Comment removed
DarthPaullly 2 years ago
Wow...this IS beautiful! I wish I had learned chemistry like this!
mattsphagetti 2 years ago 22
@mattsphagetti now you can:) welcome to 21st centu rion...
JADEKINGsRULE 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow... These are the kind of profs. at MIT... WOW
He uses Notes WTF.. Horrible Prof
XxCrazyn3ssxX 2 years ago
I've lectured before. It's easy to make a mistake or forget a step when you're on a time schedule. Try it sometime. It also serves as an archive and point of reference to continue from next lecture.
ucdohboy 2 years ago 7
I don't care if a professor uses notes, as long as he presents the material in a clear and organized manner like this one does.
SpamAreI 2 years ago 23
This is very helpful, thankyou
daraooo 2 years ago 5
He rights so quick, it's nice.
Mattprole 3 years ago 5
he is a fukin awsome teaccher, ahhaa have you seen how fast he gets to the point...
rharris2727 3 years ago 2
cewl...osm
zathura7 3 years ago
thankyou
nhojmabon 3 years ago
3.091, 3.091, 3.091, 3.091!!!
maxdelbruck 3 years ago 4
I wish I had this professor for MY university chemistry lectures :O
daous2 3 years ago 4