The Japanese response to the Fukushima nuclear crisis: Forgetting the history of Hiroshima

[EndNuclearAgenda21]

I heard they were having problems with radiation being released before the earthquake and so it is relevant to explore this theory as if this is true then we need to know what they were doing wrong before the accident, I talked to an Areva representative and he denied knowing that the fuel that they sell these companies is contaminated and is causing more reactions like this one,, we have had several incidents since fukushima all over the world,, Areva is selling tainted fuel

[NuclearExitNow]

Before the nuclear material contaminated by a nuclear power plant, the environment, this is already happened through the reduction in the uranium mines.

In the vicinity of uranium mines always there is a large-scale contamination of whole areas and rivers! look yt "Uranium Mines" and google "List of uranium mines"

[NuclearExitNow]

two nights ago I had a bad dream

... of a criminal organization that has conspired against mankind and future generations....!

[firebombclipper]

Great video. Big Secret #1 The nuclear mafia {Areva, Tepco, IAEA, NRC, GE, Westinghouse, Toshiba, etc.} have never been able to design a plan to deal with more than one meltdown. There is no triple meltdown with double china syndrome plan. Never was. Google it. Reactors should have been built 20 miles apart, everywhere. What if everybody finds this one fact out ? That governments had no right to build them in the first place ?

[seanlookalike]

Keep up the good analysis William

[u12kno]

Yes ,forgetting the history of Hiroshima is going to be real easy after FUKthe WorldoverASHIMA

[JucheeTV]

There is no lower limit of radiation where you are save !

Radiation exposure affects your DNA.

It is the cumulative sum of all radiation exposure absorbed by the body that determines  the probability of leukemia later.

[bojacobs]

William, I am a nuclear historian in Hiroshima. I applaud your efforts and your clear voice. Thank you.

[AluminumStudios]

@bojacobs Dr. Jacobs, I'm familiar with you! I've seen several interviews with you since the crisis began. I respect your opinions and the way you speak, so I'm very happy to hear your comment. Thank you very much.

[TheWilfred007]

Then why the FUCK did the Japanese BUILD FUCKING nuclear Plants FUCK me i would not have built Nuclear plants in a spot like That.

[GoddardsJournal]

Exactly, I grew up with the understanding that after the bombs, the Japanese had a special appreciation of the necessarily unethical nature of inflicting harm through nuclear means. Now the Japanese government spearheads a movement to normalize mass radioactive contamination of all people and especially children.

But polls show that most Japanese now oppose nuclear energy. What we're seeing is a small but powerful pro-nuclear cabal attempting to protect the health of the nuclear industry.

[HyperIndividualist]

How can 3 cores - all of them larger than the puny one at Chernobyl - meltdown & release LESS than the one did at Chernobyl? Logic informs us that they're lying. Why they're lying gets into the inherent pathology of government & the unique geography and size of Japan. Japan is a thin archipelago, as you know. There's not enough room to adequately absorb all the evacuees they'd have if they admitted the full truth, & so the decision has been made at the highest levels to just let the people die.

[HyperIndividualist]

@HyperIndividualist Incidentally, that's the rationalization I've logically concluded they're using to sleep at night. I think there's plenty of room-if they're willing to spend the money & tell the truth, which they obviously aren't. It doesn't help matters when money junkie psychos and their sociopathic sycophants are running the show, especially when it comes to the Nuclear Mafia. Children with dosimeters tells us that mentally ill people are in charge. They only care about money & power.

[AluminumStudios]

@HyperIndividualist Thanks for the comments. Chernobyl exploded and literally blew the reactor core contents up and out into the environment. There was no concrete containment structure in that design. The Fukushima reactors melted and have holes, but most of the fuel has stayed as a mass inside. Now they are leaking like a sieve and melting through, so in the end it may release more. It's like a Chernobyl in slow motion.

[woodgate50]

@AluminumStudios good info . Have you seen watch?v=4iWPEUp3olU&feature=ch­annel_video_title , and w w w. radio4all . net/index.php/program/50681

[HyperIndividualist]

@AluminumStudios It's true that much of Unit 4's core did blow out into the environment at Chernobyl, but much of it also melted down into blobs of corium, photos of which are available online. How much blew out and how much melted down into rather large blobs of corium is up for debate. The condition of the fuel at the three admittedly melted down reactors at Fukushima is a mystery until they can get cameras in there to verify it. Unfortunately they're all flooded, so that's a long way off.

[edpotkay1]

@AluminumStudios William. I have to disagree. If you saw the video of reactor 3 when it exploded you will see that it blew the roof twice as high as the towers in front of it. Those towers are 2000 feet tall. So the roof was blown almost a mile in the air. We have seen pictures here and there is no containment or reactor left on #3.Unfortunately that was the plutonium reactor. Also, the spent fuel pool was on top oh the reactor, So 40 years of spent MOX fuel rods were thrown everywhere.

[AluminumStudios]

@edpotkay1 The best analysis of the vertical nature of the explosion (which can not be denied), I have seen comes from Arnold Gunderson: fairewinds com /content/gundersen-postulates-­unit-3-explosion-may-have-been­-prompt-criticality-fuel-pool I haven't heard any of the prominent, analytical, or critical voices mention the reactor core actually blowing up. I don't think not seeing it under the rubble means that it's not there, but I can't say for certain.

[GoddardsJournal]

@edpotkay1, the towers are not 2000 ft tall, they're 120 m (394 ft), and the Unit-3 roof was blown upwards 210 m (687 ft) : watch?v=l3CJLNJpUVo#t=1m5s

The spent fuel was stored beside, not above, the reactor. And the reactor is still there, but its containment was breached and has thereby been off gassing : watch?v=bNC7aMc1MP4#t=0m22s

[ubuibme24]

@AluminumStudios That is what they say but I believe that the plutonium found is FROM the reactor cores and blew out in the Reactor 3 explosion. They knew all of this to begin with ... we are basically fuked.... that is the new word for fubar these days...thanks for your videos...you so a really good job!

[SHARKREEF2011]

@AluminumStudios its ALREADY released HUNDREDS of times more than chernoybl

[donnyab]

problem is they don't KNOW what to do...they are completely at a loss.

its beside the ocean which is a huge problem and there is an enormous mass of the material to be moved and the age old problem where the hell do you move it to ?

this stuff should be buried hundreds of feet under the ground like the Fins are planning to do but that takes long term planning, they have been ignoring the storage problem as has every other country but unfortunately time has caught up with us

[MsUsernameification]

@AluminumStudios. Excellent video. Very measured, thoughtful and much-needed. There are only two others that I know of who are posting youtube videos about Fukushima from Japan - playbacklapompe and aristoman. Your entrance is therefore much-welcomed, and I'll subscribe to your videos.

[u12kno]

Sorry, i ran out of room..... you may not agree with my idea , about Nuking Fukushima ,... it may be the only way. . .

Last words" Aluminum Studio', GOOD VIDEO. , GOOD WORK,, SHOW YOUR VIDEO TO YOUR STUDENTS...

...BAB ....

[AluminumStudios]

@u12kno Thanks for your comment. I'm afraid physics isn't such that nuking Fukushima is an option. It will just spread a million times more contamination. It is not possible to "burn up" nuclear fuel, as the radioactive atoms that are the problem can't be destroyed. The byproducts such as cesium which are poisoning and the world and Japan aren't fissionable either, so entombment after it cools down enough to stop boiling water is the only option.

[u12kno]

@AluminumStudios Your welcome. You think its is not possible to burn up nuclear fuel...

i disagree , Russia had one call the ZAR ,that would do the job just fine. And as far as spreading a million times more contaminations... ITS BEEN GOING ON FOR 4 MONTHS. ...come on! Dam...am i stuck in a world full of sissies?

[Dreadnaughtos]

@u12kno The "zar Bomba" had its mega ton yield reduced because the Russians had grave concerns about radioactive fallout, making the objective a mute point if fallout poisoned its own citizens. Even then there was still huge amounts of radiation that was injected into the Jets streams, which then circled the globe. Aluminium is right, containment is the only option. At least until new technologies become available. Get annoyed that they are not containing it. Rather than being so eager to die.

[u12kno]

@Dreadnaughtos EAGER TO DIE? Is that your goal in life? I think my idea is to stop the contamination of the entire world.. I would like to remind you, September 16, 2007

Israelis ‘blew apart Syrian nuclear cache’, intelligence sources said it was a highly successful Israeli raid on nuclear material supplied by North Korea. LOOK IT UP !

[Dreadnaughtos]

@u12kno Sorry but, whats your point? Why would it be MY goal in life.. when you would opt for an explosion so big it would annihilate much of North Japan and fully Irradiate the planet. I'm glad you mentioned the 'Zar bomba' because when you do the maths, you realise a nuke strike on a NUKE plant such as Fukushima would be several orders of magnitude to the 'Zar'. Now, figure in the Russians original reduction from 100MT to 50MT, due to OBVIOUS over fallout. Perhaps YOU should 'look it up'. :)

[u12kno]

@Dreadnaughtos

I have no point. all you want to do is wait and see, here is some thing to look up... MR. mexican Battleship. USS Arizona and Japan , yes they even saw it coming! NUKE IT

[Dreadnaughtos]

@u12kno Yes I know about the attack on the nuclear cache. Ask yourself, "what information in regards to contamination have I seen or researched in connection with this event?" The travesty is not that they are making nuclear material, it is that someone allowed them to just be blown up. Then after that, realise that blowing up a non fissioning alleged 'cache' is clearly not the same as blowing up SIX nuclear reactor's that is undergoing fission, with raw fuel equivalent to 20 Chernobyl's... O_o

[Dreadnaughtos]

@u12kno Also, I respectfully suggest you perhaps look into or research:

'Radiological Consequences of an Attack on the Dimona Reactor',

for a minimal example, to put into context your idea of a Nuke Strike on six nuclear reactors with the equivalent fuel contamination potential of 20 Chernobyl. That's not even including the other nuclear plant a couple of miles down the coast from Daiichi that would be affected by the blast.. also with its own set of reactors and fuel surplus... THINK.

[Dreadnaughtos]

@AluminumStudios THANK YOU! I have been trying to tell people that every time I hear that crazy idea. lol You cant use Nuclear weapons to get rid of Nuclear radiation. Its physics 101! :D

[u12kno]

Seems like the most peolpe think it wont effect them, and it will just go away. Its been 4 months now, "WELL" it time to try something else.

Over the years, there have been many Nuclear Bombs Tested. We need to test another one in FUKUSHIMA . (My thoughts are =) That the fuel rods will burn up, therefore ending the CONTINUING CONTAMINATION OF THE ENTIRE WORLD. (WE were all told 'Bad people have dirty-nuke suitcase bombs and would kill us all.) FUKUSHIMA is a dirty - nuke