What a sad story. You could almost replace Hitler with George W.Bush, and Poland with Iraq and listen to a similar sad story. Unfortunately, people of Chamberlain's honesty and integrity no longer exist in politics. Instead, we got Blair to join in the worst act of international terrorism of the 21st century. The entire Bush administration and Tony Blair should have their own wing in Gitmo for as long as.....well as long as we want really.
But to the point of the vid, this is an era when the world went mad. America didnt know what side she wanted to back, France had sucomed to the Nazi's. The Italians backed the largest army on her borders. Those who sided with Germany got invaded, even as they were neuteral. But we stood up, and said No not on our watch. Every man women and child in this country paid dealy, but no price can be put on freedom.
i say this crankpitititi go get a job, blacks are not a problem. more likely black hatered is a problem. our forces fought long and hard to protect all. i find your comment disgusting as would Chamberlain and Churchill. your kind are the reason the english are considered racist and not allowed to celerbrate St Georges day. Screw you and the British Nazi Party!
MrFishman hats off to you, i served with blacks in the British army and proud to have done, darn good fellows!
@Shadeofnight51 i dont agree i think the king declared war officily by signing a document and this was the prime minister informing the people of the united kingdom that they were at war
@kingnick104 ate, the king would have signed the declaration of war before the final note was delivered, however it would have stated the note and the response needed to make the declaration valid.
@Elleryie you are correct most likely the king had already signed the document declaring war but this was the prime minister informing the people of the united kingdom and her empire but the king would normally sign a decleration of war a prime minister puts on his desk as a matter of course
pay back for the 6 million jews murdered? dresden what about coventry the blitz? starving the poles the jews the dutch people? give it a rest krauts live with it :)
The persecution of Jews of course is true. But the Germans in Czecho-Slovakia e.g. were treated the same like Jews, they had to wear a huge white "N" on their sleeves (Niemetz = "German" in czech language) and 2 Million Germans were brutally murdered by Czech-Polish bandits after the war was over. (Allied idea of "liberation"). Another hidden genocide.
The Allies made up a lot of lies, "lampshades made of human skin" etc. to besmirch and foul the Germans. Today we know it is a lie.
We should of joined Germany we wouldn't have all these immigrants Pakis niggas Muslims all these fuckers who made crime rate rise Britain would be 1 healthy country I didn't see no black fuckers help in the war so they should fuck off
@MrFishman113 actually 'pakis' and 'niggaz' fought in WW1 and WW2 upon our side. Go to any war mermorial, read the plate (assuming you can read) and you will see african and indian names on that plate. educate yourself govner
@Cinimod237 Africans and Asians fought on Hitler's side, too.
Hitler even had Jewish and half-Jewish soldiers in his army and in the Waffen-SS, so a lot of what you hear about Hitler being a "jew-eater" is not true.
His policy towards the Jews changed when the Jews declared war on Germany - 5 times.
It was actually the Zionist (British-American) Jews who betrayed the European Jews. Their goal was not to "save Jews", but to settle Palestine and created the Terror-State Israel.
@MrFishman113 For your information, there were actually black soldiers involved in WW2 infact there was a whole group of afro-american pilots in the U.S. airforce the 332nd fighter group of the U.S. airforce widely known as the Tuskegee airmen. And unlike their white counterparts they had to fight for their right to defend their country,and were constantly faced with condemnation from white soldiers. But they were as good as any other, infact they guarded bombers on their raids and ...(contd.)
@MrFishman113 (contd) despite heavy opposition and cassualties on their side they never lost a bomber to the enemy. There were also black fighters in the infantry and the Royal Canadian Airforce.
BTW 2.5 million Indian soldiers fought for Britain and her allies. As well as many African soldiers. And one of the most heroic deeds of the RAF the battle of Britian was fought not only by British but also by Cech,French and Polish fighters flying for the RAF.
@MrFishman113 (condt)Britain forming an alliance would at one point have involved Hitler wanting to cleanse it of ethnic foreigners. BTW that would have meant that many of our most popular people wouldn´t be known to us.such names as Sir Peter Ustinov, Stephen Fry Amy Winehouse,Peter Sellers,Sacha Baron Cohen,Boris Johnson the Milliband brothers Daniel Radcliffe,Mark Ronson,Sir Ben Kingsley,Salman Rushdie,Dev Patel,Prime Minister Disraeli ,Freddie Mercury etc.Just imagine football without blacks
@crankpitititi AMYTHINGS BETTER WITH OUT DIRTY BLACK FUCKERS INIT THIS COUNTRY HAS SEEN CRIME RATE RISE IN 75% SINCE WE LET ALL THESE BLACK BASTARDS IN LOOK AT THE FACTS THEY HAVE FUCKED THIS COUNTRY
I have created a music album which charts this same period of British history:
Britain At War - Darkest Hour by Rhesus Monkey. The album covers the Prelude to War, The King's Speech, The Battle of France, Dunkirk, The Battle of Britain, and of course The Blitz. I've also created a video to accompany Churchill's address to the United States in June 1941: 'The Old Lion'. You can view that video within my YouTube channel.
Probably Britain's biggest mistake. Sure we came out victorious, but our economy was in shatters and the empire crumbling. Just look at what Britain is today compared to what it used to be like. We should have made an alliance with Germany in 1939 to secure our empire's strength and possibly expand it. Hitler favoured the English greatly, and having the 1939 Wehrmacht and Royal Navy ruling the world together would have been tremendous. UK - the real losers of WW2
@Lintflas Exactly, i mean, throughout history England and Germany have rarely been enemies, and have usually been in alliances with each other (e.g Prussia when facing Napoleon). We have never been natural enemies, and in many respects we come from the same bloodline. WW1 was all just about imperial greed and arrogance. What a total waste of life
@TalonMercenary@Lintflas Boy am I sure glad that you people are fringe. Britain should have allied with Hitler? Wow. And Lint, impressive empires suck, because they are, ultimately, oppressive empires. I mean if you're the benefactor of the oppression of others, that's cool, as long as you can live with your head in the sand.
@incognito253 We went to war to defeat a supposed tyranny, and we did in the end.......with our economy in shatters and the empire, which had brought so much to the world, beginning to break apart. England today is a very different and very depressing country to what it was before the war. How can you say that losing hundreds of thousands of soldiers and civilians was justified when we could have remained a world superpower?
@TalonMercenary Spot on!!! and because of the wars every country on the EU is bankrupt and the bankers hold ALL the wealth then WHY are we bothered if we all default and start again, only the Bankers loose not he people
"Tyranny" is always a relative term. I suppose 400 Million in India would have called the British rulers "Tyrants", likewise, many Germans did NOT perceive Hitler a Tyrant, as he kicked the French Tyrants off German land and gave millions a job, hope and bread.
WW II was a huge fraud, behind all wars is MONEY and selfish politicians who do not care about their people.
E.g. Churchill did not care about 40 000 English civilians who lost their lives when Germany finally bombed England back.
@Elberiver11 "bombed England back"? You realise the bombing of Berlin in 1940 was an accident? It was the Germans who started this civilian bombing, and not just in ww2, they did it in ww1 with zeppelins, and battleships shelling unarmed towns. They got everything they deserved, and more at Dresden and Hamburg
@TalonMercenary here we go again: the British Empire, who murdered, enslaved and robbed half the world, is "innocent". And the Germans are "bad", right?
LOL, mate! In some of your comments i thought, at least one sane English person. But here we go again with your lies and hollywood-TV history.
Its funny how a Britihs of all people, whose ancestors murdered 1 Million children and women in Dresden, Duren, Hiroshima and other Axis cities with his American friends, dares pointing their finger to others about "killing civilians"?
Yes, the Allies bombed Berlin by accident, and Hiroshima and Dresden too. And they merely accidentally started war on us. Rule Britannia! :)
@TalonMercenary is right. The Zepellin was bad, The Germans are bad, the Allies are good, the children and women murdered by the British all deserved it.
Just to let you know, the British Empire started war on us - not we on you, you liar.
Maybe the Zepellin, who wiped London off the map, should have dropped leaflets over you , saying "thanks for murdering 1 Million German children and elderly with your British starvation blockade"?
@Elberiver11 Casualties happen that's the reality of war, you live in a fantasy world if you think we could of defeated the Germans without taking some civilians also. How about the millions of men women and children the Germans slaughtered on PURPOSE? Ever heard of the Blitz? Pretty sure Germans intended to kill innocent Londoners then.. And it was the US that nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki not the UK..
@TalonMercenary Excuse me? All these millions of children and women, murdered by your warcriminal Grandfathers, "deserved it"?
Ah OK, thanks for saving my time. I know now that i am talking to a typically British racist and hooligan. Go waste somebody else's time, i shall not waste my time on racists and liars. All the best,and keep watching these "hurray let's kill children" hollywood shows, they will give you education :)
@Elberiver11 This is the thing i don't understand about you people. You say nothing about the bombing of London by bombers, V1s and V2s, plus all of the bombing by zeppelins in ww1, but you're always the first to whine and scream "WAR CRIME!" when Dresden comes up. It happened. It's war. Deal with it
@TalonMercenary If the Germans had had her way, you'd still be a superpower. Hitler was anti-communistt and did want war on Stalin, but not on England. He wanted British and Italy as Allies against Communism. Hitler admired the British Empire.
Its amazing how the English firmly believe that Germany started war on them. In truth, Germany never started war on England in all of history. In both wars it was the British leadership who started war on Germany.
@Elberiver11 In both wars Germany was given a firm ultimatum. 1st - not to cross into Belgium, they did this. 2nd - not to invade Poland, they did this also. The British declared the war but it was the Germans who forced it upon themselves by breaking the peace
@incognito253 If England had allied with Germany , rather than with Dictator , rapist and genocidal killer Stalin (wow!!), Europe would have been free from tyranny.
The real tyranny came after the war, when Stalin invaded half Europe, with England's help (wow!), and pushed millions under the iron boot of a Communist dictatorship.
Churchill called millions of raped, tortured and murdered civilians during times of peace "a liberation". Wow!
@Elberiver11 Churchill/ England did not support Stalin's communist invasion of Europe. To win a war, sometimes you have to ally yourself with the lesser of two evils, but at no point after the war did Churchill support Stalin's blockade of East Berlin and Eastern Europe. Two words for you - "Iron Curtain"
@TalonMercenary They have not rarely been enemies, but NEVER.
In fact, Germany and England were ruled by the same king in the 19th century, King Georgg of Hanover. (Hanover was a German Kingdom, today called "Neather-Saxony").
Hanover is where Queen Victoria stems from. The Germans always knew that the Angles and Saxons came from Germany, and because of the ties by Hanover and Saxe-Coburg & Gotha dynasty (today falsely named "Windsor") the Germans never regarded the English as "enemies".
@Elberiver11 The Allies certainly don't have clean hands this is true, but you can't deny, our young men died to bring back freedom for Europe, which today is being consumed once again by the EU.........what a surprise its led once again by the Germans. As they say, leopards never change their spots
@TalonMercenary dont have clean hands? Starting two world wars on Germany, with the aim of the destruction of a whole nation - just because she is an economic competitor?
Well, of course i deny that the Allies waged war to "bring freedom". Look further down (resp. further up) what i wrote about 3..0 Million German civilians being murdered by the Allies during time of "peace".
When you torture, rape, child-abuse, rob and murder millions its not "peace".
@Elberiver11 3 million? I hope you are not including Soviet rapes and killings in that. They were UK/USA allies sure, but they were separate from the ww2 term The Allies
@TalonMercenary I really wonder how you can call the British-Communist attack on Germany "bringing freedom"?
It is proven today that Stalin wanted war, Hitler was not stupid and attacked Stalin first. America and British had the same plans to attack Russia like Hitler did.
Stalin and his best friend Churchill subjugated half of Europe under Communist Dictatorship.
Dictator Stalin killed 39 Million in GULAG concentration camps and enslaved whole nations. Is this "freedom"?
In that case i wonder why the EURO was forced upon us against our will, and even more i wonder why the EU is in Brussels? I dont know about your maps, mate, but on my maps i dont see Brussels being the German capital.
I should know, because i happen to live in the German capital, but its not called "Brussels".
The majority of Germans never wanted the EURO, it was forced upon us. If you knew German law, then you'd know that Allies occupation law is valid and we are not a free nation. Its London and Washington dictating us until today.
Would a British Prime Minister go to France and get on his knees, apologizing for the wars between your countries? No? Our traitor-chancellor Merkel, a former communist and a tool of the Allies, does that. This woman should be jailed for high treason.
@TalonMercenary PS: but frankly i am not sure if your British politicians are any better than those traitors who rule us. I personally believe that nearly all leaders in the EU, be they British, French or German, are traitors and serve the interests of bankers and corporations, rather than caring about their own people.
If i was British, i would e.g. not accept a British Prime Minister allowing millions of Aliens flooding into your country. But that's up to the British.
Finally: I think the European nations will always have some differences, but basically there was no reason for two world wars.
Both were triggered by the Rothschild-Rockefeller Bankers, because war is best business. Not for the weapons-dealers, the real money is cashed in by those who enslave us all by DEBT - and that is the Banksters.
In any case, i think its time the English get this thing of "Germans wanting to take England" off their head. This was never the case.
In the Seven Years war Britain, Prussia and other German states were great allies against France and Russia. In the Napoleonic wars Britain and Prussia were great allies aganst Napoleon. Britain should never have turned its back on its old ally Germany, the real enemy to the British empire was the USA
@Lintflas Propoganda? How simple minded are you? People don't get taught one sided history... especially not about WWII due to the fact there is far too much to learn about it. If you wished to uncover the facts of WWII you have to look at a good 80 years of History at least, to study that you would have to study it for years at a University level.
What a loser for declaring War on Germany! Britain should have NEVER got involved in a border dispute between (the made up country of Poland via the League of Nations) and Germany. Britain as a country is finished as the losers there are committing suicide by allowing the Asians to steal their country. Down with Zionism!
A catastrophic decision on the part of Great Britain marking a major strategic mistake in getting involved in the quarrel between Germany and Poland and indeed trying to control and prevent Germany extending herself Eastwards which would have secured an early end to the Soviet Union and European Communism. Instead it resulted in a World War and the complete loss of the British Empire to the delight of both the USA and USSR,
You're an idiot, Hitler was murdering innocent people in occupied territories. He was killing Jews, ethnic Poles and many others. His plan was to invade Soviet Union and completly destroy it and enslave its people, he viewed the Russians as "Untermensch" "Sub-Human" Britain could not sit there and say "I'm neutral". Britain always wanted to be viewed as the good! so they had no choice but to fight against the Nazis
@MaskedTehGamer You are a 'Sun' reader it seems, maybe thats where you learned your History or never looked at the wider less discussed reasons for war. Firstly ethnic Germans were brutalised and treated as unwanted immigrants in Danzig and many parts of East Prussia after the brutal terms of the 1920 Versailles Treaty.(you should investigate this further) Also It is wideley known that the Soviet Union under Stalin had already made plans for a pre emptive attack on Nazi Germany prior to 1941.
You completely ignored what i said, i don't care about who invaded who it doesnt matter i do not like the Soviets or Nazis i hate them both. what i do care is the lives of innocent people, it is very well known that the Nazis murdered millions of innocent russians just because they were "Slavic" not Germanic. they also murdered millions of Jews but that has been mentioned many times so i wont bother. Soviets comitted crimes against the Germans to get revenge. i would do the same.
@MaskedTehGamer International Jews have been responsible for the indirect deaths of tens of millions in the third world through their ruthless greed and criminality, people like Lehman and Goldman Sachs group who caused yet another financial crisis as their forefathers did in 1929. They have nothing to answer for of course not. This was'nt an act of God or a routine 10 year event it was fraud on a massive scale .As for the Soviets, they killed raped and murdered their way across Germany.
Where is your proof that the Soviet raped and murdered their way across europe?if you have no proof then i suggest you to shut up and listen to me. Nazis murdered 20 million people in Russia alone im not including Ukraine and Belarus. there wasn't anyone in russia who didn't lose a family member.in Belarus 1/3 population was murdered by the end of the war. if you would like proof just ask ill provide it. I'm not denying that the soviets comited crimes but they did it to get revenge
@MaskedTehGamer It is common knowlege and mainstream History that the Soviet hordes raped over 2Million German women. The German Army did not do the same, yes mainly because they regarded the Soviet Slavonic race as inferior. The War against the Soviet Union was one against its Jewish Bolshevist regime and to gain living space for the German people. The victories of 1941 were staggering and if the German Army had continued on to Moscow without delay in August 41 the war would have been won.
@sidelock123 Firstly I am German, secondly I had a relative in the German Army taking part in operation Barbarossa as part of Army Croup Centre so don't lecture me on the 'British' Bombing of German cities. The English and the Germans are blood relatives unlike you American or whatever mix part Russian half breed you may be. Essentially if England had joined with her cousins the Germans(Anglo Saxon & Germans) we would now be running the world not USA and Russia would be an advanced German state
So wait a minite if you are fully aware that the Germans viewed the Soviets as inferior and commited crimes against them then why do u hate on them for raping 2 million german women? its like saying the germans had the right to do it but the soviets didn't. you should instead give them credit for getting revenge on them. wouldn't you do the same thing? if u were a soviet soldier ? if ur answer is NO then sorry something is wrong with u.
@MaskedTehGamer The Russians are inferior. The Germans would have colonized this bleak wasteland and turned its run down towns into thriving modern cities with roads and structure, rail and culture, just as the British had done in India and Southern Africa. No i would not have raped because I am a more cultured civilized human being than a Russian.
@MaskedTehGamer Have just checked out your page and you are a typical f...ked up American prick,. War lover rape lover! and general nut case. The USA I shit on your flag!
@MrLjKiD1998 If you are then you should realise they 'kindly' helped us out of our Empire and world position thanks to our stupid invilvement in an unneccessary Eastern European war. They are no closer related to the English and please note im saying the ENGLISH than the French. English-Anglo/Saxon=German, American-predominantly at that time mixed European and essentially Galic Irish decent.
@sidelock123 We proud British would never have joined Hitler´s stupid war.Apart from a few fascist twats.Would you please stop talking such nonsense. At least do a bit of research before making stupid remarks.There are far more German-Americans than Russian or even Irish-Americans so please stop it,I bet even you know that it´s bollocks.My maternal grandfather is German and he fought in WW2.But he told me how he and his men felt betrayed by Hitler and Germany.Think before you talk.
@crankpitititi For your information-My Great Uncle was a soldier in the Waffen SS Das Reich regiment they were fighting communism and the dark satanic forces of International Jewish finance which is even today still trying to destroy the world in favour of naked power and greed! You have been brainwashed and should be ashamed to call yourself a German!
@sidelock123 First of all I´ve never called myself German ......And secondly you´ve missed my point I said that it was wrong for you to say that Americans and Germans aren´t related because a LARGE NUMBER of Americans have got German ancestory.
@crankpitititi The Jews who fled Germany to the USA and Britain although the majority went to the USA , they and their sond and daughters say they have 'German ancestory', let me tell you they are no more German than you............
@sidelock123 Well then let me tell you that a large amount of Germans that went over to the new continent,did so before Hitler was even born . Most of whom weren´t Jewish .Germans have been going there since America´s discovery and not only under Nazi rule.Those are facts and if you fail to accept them ,you should consider going back to history lesson number 1.You don´t want to tell me that all the English and Irish that went to America were all Jews, because that would be bollocks.
@sidelock123 Well I´ve never been to America so I suppose it wouldn´t be right to call it my country. My country is the United Kingdom of GREAT Britain and Northern Ireland. As well as the Republic of Ireland
@sidelock123 HAHAHA!!! Yes, the country who's had exactly one non-protestant president (and he was a Catholic), had a President who ran on a 'I hate everyone who isn't a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant' platform, and who refused to take literally tens of thousands of Jews during WWII is run by Jews. HAHAHA!!! That's a good one! You filthy, stupid Nazis are always so entertainingly stupid!
@sidelock123 It's most likely that the Red Army would have kept fighting even if Moscow had fallen, their arms industries would still be pretty much intact in the east and the Soviet industries outproduced the German industries.
@jimmyn89SWE That can be argued although it was the sheer speed and shock of the intial German attack on 22nd June and the pace of the advance that it may have been impossible for the re deployment of arms factories to the East and Siberia if Moscow had fallen in late September- mid October. Hitler made a decisive mistake in diverting South before the main attack on Moscow thereby losing the momentum of the attack and allowing not only the Soviet defences but the redeployment of their arms.
@sidelock123 Some of their industries were already located in the east and the Soviets were quite effective at moving their industries, they were rebuilt and resumed production pretty quickly. And if even if German forces manages to reach Moscow they would still need to actually capture it, if it were to turn into a Stalingrad style house to house fighting it could be a long and bloody affair and while the Red Army could afford high casualties the Wehrmacht could not.
@jimmyn89SWE I dont thin Moscow would have been a Stalingrad situation as the city would have been fallen on before time for preperation of any significant defences in Sep 41.
The Germans could have easily dropped paratroops into the city and used panzer armies to surround the city suburbs. I think Moscow would have collapsed and Stalin would have pushed for peace terms. The entire networks of rail and road cenered on Moscow. It is unlikeley the Soviets could ever have come back from its loss.
@sidelock123 Moscow would have been worse then Stalingrad. They couldn't have 'easily dropped paratroopers in', as that deep into Russia was uncontestedly red skies. Panzer armies would have been met by entire divisions of Tiger Tanks, and literally millions of infantry men. Stalin was a power-hungry lunatic. Peace was never considered. There was no situation, no matter how lucky Hitler was, where he got passed the Urals, and there were only a few where he could have come close.
@jimmyn89SWE It is recored that in early October Stalin enquired deicreetly about sueing for peace and considered leaving just before the onset of an early winter that year. When the weather changed he decided to sit it out.
@sidelock123 No. It isn't. Once Stalin came out of his multi-week seclusion, he came out raging against Germany and declaring that all of Russia would be in flames before they gave in. 14 time zones, the largest population, and the second largest wartime economy in the world. That's what the German Reich faced. No country in the world, not the United States, Great Britain, Germany or Japan, could overcome those first two alone. Germany lost the moment Stalin stood against them.
@jimmyn89SWE You are correct. Sidelock is wrong. Terribly wrong, and completely ignorant of the capabilities of the USSR. By the time the US entered the war, the Soviet chiefs of staff had already moved most war productions into the unassailable Ural mountains, and the capture of Moscow would be insignificant as it would have taken literally months to actually capture it, while it would have only taken days to get out what the Reds saw as important: Stalin and the Chiefs of Staff.
@Unilateralism Nonsense-The shambles of a country that the supreior German armies witnessed collapsed in the first few months after the start of Barbarossa. If Hitler has continued as planned to capture the then undefended Moscow the whole rotten state would have collapsed. PS I wont even embarass you by reminding you that the'Tiger' tank was German..................Please read some History instead of shitty communist propaganda from the time...PS Russia today is in no better shape politically.
@sidelock123 HAHAHA!!! Have you ever read anhything about WWII outside of a grade school textbook? Within months of the beginning of Barbarossa, the Soviet army was drafting nearly a MILLION people a month. And there was no such thing as 'undefended' Soviet territory. The Soviet people wer so united against the Germans the entire Moscovy population would have literally just absorbed bullets long enough for Stalin and the Chiefs to escape. PS. I'm talking about the T-34 you idiot.
@Unilateralism Idiot-My great Uncle served with 2nd SS Das Reich and we have his diaries from this period. You are obviously a Judeo Bolshevik and have no comprehension of truth. That shit hole- namely Russia would have been successfully colonized and the cities turned into modern ones with road and rail if the Germans had been victorious. The only reasons the Soviets had any success was the fact that the entire world were fighting against the German army and its economy !
@sidelock123 LOL!!! I'm a Puerto Rican Libertarian you dult!!! And the rest of the world didn't join the fight until Germany was on its last legs. Hell, the US didn't even truly join the fight until D-Day. The Germans were strong, I'm not denying that. Large army, strong economy, and good training. However, once they forced Russia to access the raw potential associated with the largest population in the world, Germany didn't stand a chance.
@Unilateralism Bullshit the German armies were superior in every way as was the equipment at that stage. The only thing that saved the Soviet Union in 41 was the weather and Hitlers failure to capture and occupy Moscow before its onset.
@sidelock123 No. They were not. At all. The German army outnumbered them 10-to-1, and the T-34 Tiger (not the German scrap heap you mentioned) was unmatched in armored warfare. And no, there was no '1 thing that saved the Soviet Union', there were around 20 million things that saved the Soviet Union, with about 19 million of them being Soviet soldiers, and the rest being the sum of Hitler's stupidity and Stalin's bland hatred.
@sidelock123 As for your ignorant accusations that I am a communist: Joseph Stalin directly ordered the massacre of approximately 18 million people, and was a God awful human being. The Soviet Union as a whole was an abhorrent amalgum of authoritarian corruption and socialistic mistakes, and communism is a terrible system. However, their political mistakes should not take away from the fact that they could not be conquered, even though ignorant people like you insist it does.
Also it's funny how you sit there and blame the Soviet for commiting crimes in Germany near the end of ww2. at least they had a reason to, i mean 28 million people lost their lives in Soviet Union. but why dont u mention about the British crimes? British bombed Hamburg and killed 300,000 innocent germans, they had no right to do that! Germans did not comit and crimes against the Brits! in fact they offered them friendship.. you should be blaming ur evil country! not the soviets!
@MaskedTehGamer You are talking gobshite. The Germans bombed London and dozens of other British towns killing our people. They started the bloody war so it´s their fucking problem if they get bombed in response. Do you think it´s friendship the Germans offered no it wasn´t, and luckily the brave politicians of this great country never accepted their offer.
ok so the germans bombed london and klilled civilians and british in response bombed hamburg and other german cities. but why is it that when Germans not only attacked but also "INVADED" russia! and killed millions of people no one wants to talk about that or care. all they talk about it how russians raped 2m german women.
@MaskedTehGamer Everyone committed war crimes, the Allies more than most, we should quite simply have accepted the Jews Germany just wanted to deport - which was the Germans right.
@angloengland The Allies committed more war crimes? Really... I could sit here all day listing Nazi atrocities perpetrated against allied pows and civilians of the occupied nations, which is pretty easy considering the crimes vastly outnumber anything the allies did. The Germans certainly did not have the right to deny Jews their rights, homes, property, livelihoods, then murder them by the train load.
@Anders2185 The NAZIs did have the right to deport Jewish people, the UK, USA and France did not have the moral right to deny entry to peoples whom could have been put at danger but they did. Their possessions I think is a separate issue, here in the UK for instance, most non-European immigrants came with nothing and brought no wealth into the country. Once war was declared after the NAZIs attempted to reunite their own country, the NAZIs could not feed or keep these people even if they wanted..
@Anders2185 ...effectively by refusing to accept people no longer welcome by their host nation, the UK, France and the USA condemned them to death because they knew Germany could not feed the entire populous given war and blockades. I too could sit here all day listed Allied crimes against humanity. The UK and Frances cowardice to honour protection for Poland and ignore the USSRs invasion sums the Allies up after Versailles created the conditions for WW2.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Winston Churchill himself admitting that Hitler was not the reason for the British Empire to starttwo world wars on Germany:
"For over 400 years, it has been the policy of England, to oppose the leading power on the continent - whoever it may be (....) We do not fight a French republic, or a French Emperor, or a German republic, or the Hitler regime - we simply fight the leading power on the continent".
~ Churchill in a non-public speechg in the house of commons March 1936
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Confront English, American or Polish people with their guilt for WW II, and they will immediately yell "poor Jews". As if the Jews had anything to do with WW II.
And by the way:
The over 3 Million German civilians, murdered by the "good" Allies after the war, apparantly are all "bad" people, and thus do not even deserve to be mentioned.
Some of them were put into barrels, nails pointing inside, then rolled downhill.
Americans and British have funny ideas of "liberation".....
@Elberiver11 I feel unmoved by what you say. I also feel unmoved when I see the piles of burnt rotting German corpses in the aftermath of the Dresden bombing.
As Bomber Harris himself said "They sowed the wind, and now they shall reap the whirlwind".
@angloengland By "Sowing the wind" Harris was referring to the razing to the ground by the Germans of cities such as Warsaw, Rotterdam and Coventry. Also to the blitz on London.
Some seem to incorrectly view the bombings of German cities late in the war as unprovoked.
The Germans started the brutal tactic of carpet bombing cities and it should not come as a surprise to anyone that the allies felt compelled to follow suit.
@wks1978 I understand what Harris inferred, however, NAZI Germany bombed Warsaw because it was a fortified city (which indeed it was), Rotterdam was bombed but no British or Allied city including Coventry had been bombed when the RAF resorted to bombing German cities. The Netherlands was a neutral nation and not an allied nation. The British used Rotterdam as an excuse to start this bombing and hugely exaggerated the victims of this bombing of Rotterdam (as usual) in order to justify this.
@MrStig691 Your simplistic view, like I said, hopefully won't be shared by modern victims and the wider Arab world of 'our aggression abroad' and the millions of dead we caused in Iraq through 'bombing them first'. Looks like with our Israeli allies fueling the fire that the US and Israel at least will be bombing Iran 'first' soon too.
@MrStig691 Plenty needs be be said, we bombed German cities before they bombed ours. Thats it, simple. It was purely a political decision, just as ignoring the Soviet bombing of Helsinki and the Soviet invasion of Poland.
@crankpitititi The Germans wouldnt have started the war if the treaty of versailles din't bankrupt, humiliate and steal from them. So I suppose the blame lies with Britain and France following WWI - WWII was inevitable and really WWI part 2.
@angloengland Well but we clearly know that Hitler´s aim was to secure or rather steal space for the Germans in eastern Europe. I don´t think that that was taking what we owed them not speaking of the murder of millions of jews, which had nothing to do with the unfair treatment of Germany, but rather Hitler´s sick phobia of jews. France´s invasion of the Rheinland wasn´t rectified but even more so Hitler´s handling of the situation.
@crankpitititi I think its best if we start from a position of what we all agree. I think we agree that Versailles stole large part of Prussia from the Germans. I think we agree that the NAZIs would have preferred all the Jews to have left Germany and created a problem for the UK, France and the USA instead. I think its clear that the UK, France and the USA did not want these people, maybe they thought it would have been an effective economic drain on Germany, maybe they just didn't want the...
@crankpitititi ...Jews either. I think we agree that Germany at war could not feed its populous (many nations in this situation today) much as the UK couldn't, however the UK had effective control of the seas. I don't believe Hitler was scared of the Jews at all, ergo I am not scared of non-European immigrants, I know they are here un-democratically and hence illegally and I do not want so many, but I do not fear them at all. I do agree on Hitlers view of Eastern Europe. However unethical...
@angloengland He was not scared of the Jews, he developed a hate for them cos his Jews mother died, and he thought it was unfair. and USA only joined as retaliation for purl harbor. And France was quickly occupied by Hitler. also USSR was not actively involved in the war till Hitler decided to invade them. If not for that mistake on his part the Nazis could have won the war, after all, USSR got to Berlin before us.
@crankpitititi ...gassing the Jews was, it resolved the issue of food production/ consumption in wartime Germany. I do believe that the number of Jews eliminated has been exaggerated however, the plague at Auschwitz itself being replaced illustrating a reduction of 2.5 million deaths at the camp. its also important to note that Jews only made up half the victims although you wouldnt know it from the propaganda.
@angloengland Even though we are arguing here I don´t want our little conversation to end in insults and stupid commenting like they so often do on youtube. SO let´s keep the comments clean. BTW wish you a happy christmas who ever and where ever you are.
@crankpitititi Thats probably enough for us to start with, I do apologize for my delay in getting back here, I hope you had a great Christmas and a Happy New Year.
@angloengland Yes indeed , hope that the same goes for you.
Well yes,but gassing gays and members of the political opposition is just as bad as gassing Jews. And in addition to that I think i´ts quite an extreme way of solving the food crysis. I think that the whole war was pointless and by the end of it Germany was in a worse state than ever.
@crankpitititi aye they were, a lofe of bread cost 1000000marks, under Hitler Germany had a very week currency. Also closing to the end of the war, many areas of Germany were being bombed.
@crankpitititi I will state outright, no war is point less. It lowers the population, of an over crowded planet, brings large steps in science and tech. A major point of world war 2 was to stop an aggressive group taking control and committing genocide. Granted, there was the English empire at the time which is the biggest in history, however it had a democratic government, and was not out to eliminate a specific group.
@Messenger375 Totally agree with you it was a brave and important deed to stand in the way of Hitler and his allies.And take up arms. I should have stated my point more clearly, what I meant was Hitler starting the war was pointless and stupid at least to every non- Nazi (symphatiser)
@wks1978 Trying to justify this because it was against 'Evil NAZIs' is outdated, the NAZIs were nothing of the sort. To blame NAZI supporters for the millions of dead is like blaming the Labour supporters for the millions of Iraqi and Afghan dead. Lets hope in years to come that they don't take Harris' view.
@TheMossadShark You're pathetic. Grow up for god sake trawling the internet pretending to be a NAZI! All I stated is that war isn't so simple as to say these were bombed first. The treaty of Versailles was unfair and caused WW2 and the invasion of the Low Countries and France through the declaration of war. Human losses are also hugely exaggerated, I'm sure you're aware that the first plague at Auschwitz stated 4m victims, this has been replaced with a plague stating 1.5m died. Another example
Limeys declared a war against Germany and lost their empire because of a bunch of polish toilet plumbers. Churchill was a fool anyway. Fatboy Winston used to show up some meetings naked.
I don't mean to be rude man. But your looking foolish with this comment. ON behalf of the Netherlands and several western European countries that are free today I thank them for the effort. They may have lost their empire but they tried to defend an important principle. The right for sovereign nations to self determination and freedom from racist tyranny.
Do you know that Christianity is correct? The world around us reveals that G-d DOES exist, and the historical evidence reveals that Jesus Christ really did come to this earth and there is overwhelming evidence that Jesus Christ really did physically rise from the dead. Jesus is coming again and the signs of the end times that were foretold in the Bible are coming to pass.
What a sad story. You could almost replace Hitler with George W.Bush, and Poland with Iraq and listen to a similar sad story. Unfortunately, people of Chamberlain's honesty and integrity no longer exist in politics. Instead, we got Blair to join in the worst act of international terrorism of the 21st century. The entire Bush administration and Tony Blair should have their own wing in Gitmo for as long as.....well as long as we want really.
widebody123 21 hours ago
There'll always be an England and England shall be free...
If England means as much to you, as England means to me!
TheEnglishBoney 1 day ago
But to the point of the vid, this is an era when the world went mad. America didnt know what side she wanted to back, France had sucomed to the Nazi's. The Italians backed the largest army on her borders. Those who sided with Germany got invaded, even as they were neuteral. But we stood up, and said No not on our watch. Every man women and child in this country paid dealy, but no price can be put on freedom.
TheEnglishBoney 1 day ago
i say this crankpitititi go get a job, blacks are not a problem. more likely black hatered is a problem. our forces fought long and hard to protect all. i find your comment disgusting as would Chamberlain and Churchill. your kind are the reason the english are considered racist and not allowed to celerbrate St Georges day. Screw you and the British Nazi Party!
MrFishman hats off to you, i served with blacks in the British army and proud to have done, darn good fellows!
TheEnglishBoney 1 day ago
Fuck Germany
dmax631 4 days ago
This is not a declaration of war. Only the monarch can declare war in the UK.
Elleryie 1 week ago
@Elleryie The Prime Minister can exercise the Royal Prerogative allowing him to declare war, this is very much a declaration of war.
Shadeofnight51 3 days ago
@Shadeofnight51 i dont agree i think the king declared war officily by signing a document and this was the prime minister informing the people of the united kingdom that they were at war
kingnick104 3 days ago
@kingnick104 ate, the king would have signed the declaration of war before the final note was delivered, however it would have stated the note and the response needed to make the declaration valid.
Messenger375 2 days ago
@Elleryie you are correct most likely the king had already signed the document declaring war but this was the prime minister informing the people of the united kingdom and her empire but the king would normally sign a decleration of war a prime minister puts on his desk as a matter of course
kingnick104 3 days ago
I Laugh When He Says Im Speaking To You
XXQTRRAPPERXX 1 week ago
pay back for the 6 million jews murdered? dresden what about coventry the blitz? starving the poles the jews the dutch people? give it a rest krauts live with it :)
ForestSuper 1 week ago
The persecution of Jews of course is true. But the Germans in Czecho-Slovakia e.g. were treated the same like Jews, they had to wear a huge white "N" on their sleeves (Niemetz = "German" in czech language) and 2 Million Germans were brutally murdered by Czech-Polish bandits after the war was over. (Allied idea of "liberation"). Another hidden genocide.
The Allies made up a lot of lies, "lampshades made of human skin" etc. to besmirch and foul the Germans. Today we know it is a lie.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
Chamberlain did not want war on Germany -. but he gave in to Zionist pressure.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
We should of joined Germany we wouldn't have all these immigrants Pakis niggas Muslims all these fuckers who made crime rate rise Britain would be 1 healthy country I didn't see no black fuckers help in the war so they should fuck off
MrFishman113 2 weeks ago
@MrFishman113 actually 'pakis' and 'niggaz' fought in WW1 and WW2 upon our side. Go to any war mermorial, read the plate (assuming you can read) and you will see african and indian names on that plate. educate yourself govner
Cinimod237 2 weeks ago
@Cinimod237 Africans and Asians fought on Hitler's side, too.
Hitler even had Jewish and half-Jewish soldiers in his army and in the Waffen-SS, so a lot of what you hear about Hitler being a "jew-eater" is not true.
His policy towards the Jews changed when the Jews declared war on Germany - 5 times.
It was actually the Zionist (British-American) Jews who betrayed the European Jews. Their goal was not to "save Jews", but to settle Palestine and created the Terror-State Israel.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@MrFishman113 I am afraid your insight comes too late. Did you know that the British Empire would still exist, if the Germans had had her way?
The Germans never started war on England in all of history., both wars were started by the British on the Germans.
Hitler made over 20 peace offers to British Empire , Churchill refused all of them and the war became a world war.
The English will find out one day, how Churchill betrayed them and sold them to alien powers.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@MrFishman113 For your information, there were actually black soldiers involved in WW2 infact there was a whole group of afro-american pilots in the U.S. airforce the 332nd fighter group of the U.S. airforce widely known as the Tuskegee airmen. And unlike their white counterparts they had to fight for their right to defend their country,and were constantly faced with condemnation from white soldiers. But they were as good as any other, infact they guarded bombers on their raids and ...(contd.)
crankpitititi 1 day ago
@MrFishman113 (contd) despite heavy opposition and cassualties on their side they never lost a bomber to the enemy. There were also black fighters in the infantry and the Royal Canadian Airforce.
BTW 2.5 million Indian soldiers fought for Britain and her allies. As well as many African soldiers. And one of the most heroic deeds of the RAF the battle of Britian was fought not only by British but also by Cech,French and Polish fighters flying for the RAF.
crankpitititi 1 day ago
@MrFishman113 (condt)Britain forming an alliance would at one point have involved Hitler wanting to cleanse it of ethnic foreigners. BTW that would have meant that many of our most popular people wouldn´t be known to us.such names as Sir Peter Ustinov, Stephen Fry Amy Winehouse,Peter Sellers,Sacha Baron Cohen,Boris Johnson the Milliband brothers Daniel Radcliffe,Mark Ronson,Sir Ben Kingsley,Salman Rushdie,Dev Patel,Prime Minister Disraeli ,Freddie Mercury etc.Just imagine football without blacks
crankpitititi 1 day ago
@crankpitititi AMYTHINGS BETTER WITH OUT DIRTY BLACK FUCKERS INIT THIS COUNTRY HAS SEEN CRIME RATE RISE IN 75% SINCE WE LET ALL THESE BLACK BASTARDS IN LOOK AT THE FACTS THEY HAVE FUCKED THIS COUNTRY
MrFishman113 1 day ago
@MrFishman113 Are you saying then that all blacks are criminals?
crankpitititi 1 day ago
The UK the real losers of WW2 i don't think so.
rbriggs160 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ANGLO- BARBARIANS SONS OF WHORE, UR TIME IS COMING
unfukkkmee 3 weeks ago
Well said talon , ill type more though when i get on my pc
GoldBloded 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have created a music album which charts this same period of British history:
Britain At War - Darkest Hour by Rhesus Monkey. The album covers the Prelude to War, The King's Speech, The Battle of France, Dunkirk, The Battle of Britain, and of course The Blitz. I've also created a video to accompany Churchill's address to the United States in June 1941: 'The Old Lion'. You can view that video within my YouTube channel.
rhesusmonkey2012 4 weeks ago
Probably Britain's biggest mistake. Sure we came out victorious, but our economy was in shatters and the empire crumbling. Just look at what Britain is today compared to what it used to be like. We should have made an alliance with Germany in 1939 to secure our empire's strength and possibly expand it. Hitler favoured the English greatly, and having the 1939 Wehrmacht and Royal Navy ruling the world together would have been tremendous. UK - the real losers of WW2
TalonMercenary 1 month ago
@TalonMercenary
I think Britain and Germany should have made a deal long before WW1. The world would be a much better place today.
You would still have your impressive empire, we would still have ours, not to mention that the German Kaiser also favoured the English greatly.
Some of the results could have been:
NO WW1, NO Hitler and NO WW2, NO cold war and NO US/Russian dominance, and last but not least NO EU.
Lintflas 1 month ago
@Lintflas Exactly, i mean, throughout history England and Germany have rarely been enemies, and have usually been in alliances with each other (e.g Prussia when facing Napoleon). We have never been natural enemies, and in many respects we come from the same bloodline. WW1 was all just about imperial greed and arrogance. What a total waste of life
TalonMercenary 1 month ago
@TalonMercenary @Lintflas Boy am I sure glad that you people are fringe. Britain should have allied with Hitler? Wow. And Lint, impressive empires suck, because they are, ultimately, oppressive empires. I mean if you're the benefactor of the oppression of others, that's cool, as long as you can live with your head in the sand.
incognito253 4 weeks ago
@incognito253 We went to war to defeat a supposed tyranny, and we did in the end.......with our economy in shatters and the empire, which had brought so much to the world, beginning to break apart. England today is a very different and very depressing country to what it was before the war. How can you say that losing hundreds of thousands of soldiers and civilians was justified when we could have remained a world superpower?
TalonMercenary 4 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary Spot on!!! and because of the wars every country on the EU is bankrupt and the bankers hold ALL the wealth then WHY are we bothered if we all default and start again, only the Bankers loose not he people
UKBLIVE 4 weeks ago
@UKBLIVE You are absolutely right, mate. The Bankers are those who trigger all wars for the last 200 years, you know why?
Because in war, Governmen needs money and gets if from where? From the BANKERS. This is enslavement,because we all get deeper and deeper into debt.
But the more debt we have, the more wealth THEY have!
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
"Tyranny" is always a relative term. I suppose 400 Million in India would have called the British rulers "Tyrants", likewise, many Germans did NOT perceive Hitler a Tyrant, as he kicked the French Tyrants off German land and gave millions a job, hope and bread.
WW II was a huge fraud, behind all wars is MONEY and selfish politicians who do not care about their people.
E.g. Churchill did not care about 40 000 English civilians who lost their lives when Germany finally bombed England back.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 "bombed England back"? You realise the bombing of Berlin in 1940 was an accident? It was the Germans who started this civilian bombing, and not just in ww2, they did it in ww1 with zeppelins, and battleships shelling unarmed towns. They got everything they deserved, and more at Dresden and Hamburg
TalonMercenary 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary here we go again: the British Empire, who murdered, enslaved and robbed half the world, is "innocent". And the Germans are "bad", right?
LOL, mate! In some of your comments i thought, at least one sane English person. But here we go again with your lies and hollywood-TV history.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
Its funny how a Britihs of all people, whose ancestors murdered 1 Million children and women in Dresden, Duren, Hiroshima and other Axis cities with his American friends, dares pointing their finger to others about "killing civilians"?
Yes, the Allies bombed Berlin by accident, and Hiroshima and Dresden too. And they merely accidentally started war on us. Rule Britannia! :)
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary is right. The Zepellin was bad, The Germans are bad, the Allies are good, the children and women murdered by the British all deserved it.
Just to let you know, the British Empire started war on us - not we on you, you liar.
Maybe the Zepellin, who wiped London off the map, should have dropped leaflets over you , saying "thanks for murdering 1 Million German children and elderly with your British starvation blockade"?
What a fool you are.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 Casualties happen that's the reality of war, you live in a fantasy world if you think we could of defeated the Germans without taking some civilians also. How about the millions of men women and children the Germans slaughtered on PURPOSE? Ever heard of the Blitz? Pretty sure Germans intended to kill innocent Londoners then.. And it was the US that nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki not the UK..
TheSaintAza 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary Excuse me? All these millions of children and women, murdered by your warcriminal Grandfathers, "deserved it"?
Ah OK, thanks for saving my time. I know now that i am talking to a typically British racist and hooligan. Go waste somebody else's time, i shall not waste my time on racists and liars. All the best,and keep watching these "hurray let's kill children" hollywood shows, they will give you education :)
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 This is the thing i don't understand about you people. You say nothing about the bombing of London by bombers, V1s and V2s, plus all of the bombing by zeppelins in ww1, but you're always the first to whine and scream "WAR CRIME!" when Dresden comes up. It happened. It's war. Deal with it
TalonMercenary 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 I guess Nazi propaganda hasn't completely died out just yet.
MGOStealth 1 week ago
@TalonMercenary If the Germans had had her way, you'd still be a superpower. Hitler was anti-communistt and did want war on Stalin, but not on England. He wanted British and Italy as Allies against Communism. Hitler admired the British Empire.
Its amazing how the English firmly believe that Germany started war on them. In truth, Germany never started war on England in all of history. In both wars it was the British leadership who started war on Germany.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 In both wars Germany was given a firm ultimatum. 1st - not to cross into Belgium, they did this. 2nd - not to invade Poland, they did this also. The British declared the war but it was the Germans who forced it upon themselves by breaking the peace
TalonMercenary 2 weeks ago
@incognito253 If England had allied with Germany , rather than with Dictator , rapist and genocidal killer Stalin (wow!!), Europe would have been free from tyranny.
The real tyranny came after the war, when Stalin invaded half Europe, with England's help (wow!), and pushed millions under the iron boot of a Communist dictatorship.
Churchill called millions of raped, tortured and murdered civilians during times of peace "a liberation". Wow!
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 Churchill/ England did not support Stalin's communist invasion of Europe. To win a war, sometimes you have to ally yourself with the lesser of two evils, but at no point after the war did Churchill support Stalin's blockade of East Berlin and Eastern Europe. Two words for you - "Iron Curtain"
TalonMercenary 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary They have not rarely been enemies, but NEVER.
In fact, Germany and England were ruled by the same king in the 19th century, King Georgg of Hanover. (Hanover was a German Kingdom, today called "Neather-Saxony").
Hanover is where Queen Victoria stems from. The Germans always knew that the Angles and Saxons came from Germany, and because of the ties by Hanover and Saxe-Coburg & Gotha dynasty (today falsely named "Windsor") the Germans never regarded the English as "enemies".
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary Yes, what you say about WW I is true. But we have not arrived yet in saying the same about WW II.
I have learned at school that Hitler wanted war, exterminated Jews and the Allies were "good".If you really search history, this is not true.
Hitler did not want war on England or America, it was both countries who started war on him.
The Polish-German conflic was deliberately created in Versailles 1919, to create a powder-keg to triggger a world war.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 The Allies certainly don't have clean hands this is true, but you can't deny, our young men died to bring back freedom for Europe, which today is being consumed once again by the EU.........what a surprise its led once again by the Germans. As they say, leopards never change their spots
TalonMercenary 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary dont have clean hands? Starting two world wars on Germany, with the aim of the destruction of a whole nation - just because she is an economic competitor?
Well, of course i deny that the Allies waged war to "bring freedom". Look further down (resp. further up) what i wrote about 3..0 Million German civilians being murdered by the Allies during time of "peace".
When you torture, rape, child-abuse, rob and murder millions its not "peace".
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@Elberiver11 3 million? I hope you are not including Soviet rapes and killings in that. They were UK/USA allies sure, but they were separate from the ww2 term The Allies
TalonMercenary 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary I really wonder how you can call the British-Communist attack on Germany "bringing freedom"?
It is proven today that Stalin wanted war, Hitler was not stupid and attacked Stalin first. America and British had the same plans to attack Russia like Hitler did.
Stalin and his best friend Churchill subjugated half of Europe under Communist Dictatorship.
Dictator Stalin killed 39 Million in GULAG concentration camps and enslaved whole nations. Is this "freedom"?
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary what? The EU is lead by Germans? LOL
In that case i wonder why the EURO was forced upon us against our will, and even more i wonder why the EU is in Brussels? I dont know about your maps, mate, but on my maps i dont see Brussels being the German capital.
I should know, because i happen to live in the German capital, but its not called "Brussels".
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
The majority of Germans never wanted the EURO, it was forced upon us. If you knew German law, then you'd know that Allies occupation law is valid and we are not a free nation. Its London and Washington dictating us until today.
Would a British Prime Minister go to France and get on his knees, apologizing for the wars between your countries? No? Our traitor-chancellor Merkel, a former communist and a tool of the Allies, does that. This woman should be jailed for high treason.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
@TalonMercenary PS: but frankly i am not sure if your British politicians are any better than those traitors who rule us. I personally believe that nearly all leaders in the EU, be they British, French or German, are traitors and serve the interests of bankers and corporations, rather than caring about their own people.
If i was British, i would e.g. not accept a British Prime Minister allowing millions of Aliens flooding into your country. But that's up to the British.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
Finally: I think the European nations will always have some differences, but basically there was no reason for two world wars.
Both were triggered by the Rothschild-Rockefeller Bankers, because war is best business. Not for the weapons-dealers, the real money is cashed in by those who enslave us all by DEBT - and that is the Banksters.
In any case, i think its time the English get this thing of "Germans wanting to take England" off their head. This was never the case.
Elberiver11 2 weeks ago
Probably the defining moment of the 20th Century .
vashna3799 1 month ago
In the Seven Years war Britain, Prussia and other German states were great allies against France and Russia. In the Napoleonic wars Britain and Prussia were great allies aganst Napoleon. Britain should never have turned its back on its old ally Germany, the real enemy to the British empire was the USA
engliscwarrior 1 month ago
What about a declaration of love on Germany?
Come on, Britain! Let's work it out! ;-)
Lintflas 1 month ago 2
@Lintflas What has Germany ever done for the UK?
rbriggs160 1 month ago
@rbriggs160
The question should be, what has Britain ever done for Germany?
But Iet me guess, you're just one those British who learned a one-sided propaganda version of history that puts 100% of the blame on the Germans?
You could start by declaring Winston Churchill one of the greatest war criminals in history.
He rejected about 20 German peace offers which were supported by many European leaders.
What you and me learned at school is only 50% of the truth.
Lintflas 1 month ago
@Lintflas Propoganda? How simple minded are you? People don't get taught one sided history... especially not about WWII due to the fact there is far too much to learn about it. If you wished to uncover the facts of WWII you have to look at a good 80 years of History at least, to study that you would have to study it for years at a University level.
InjuringThunder 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i feel sorry to him
i hope that he lived till war ended to see his country win.
i do not know but i feel that he was wise and smart.
(((sorry but my english is not so good)))
mohdzh00 1 month ago
Comment removed
mohdzh00 1 month ago
Comment removed
mohdzh00 1 month ago
Mistake number one, Chamberlain tied to negotiate in good faith is a mad man. Duh Always know your enemy
xpandergt 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a loser for declaring War on Germany! Britain should have NEVER got involved in a border dispute between (the made up country of Poland via the League of Nations) and Germany. Britain as a country is finished as the losers there are committing suicide by allowing the Asians to steal their country. Down with Zionism!
WesternVoices3 2 months ago
Comment removed
WesternVoices3 2 months ago
@efelinfo Fyi, Hitler had actually hoped that the UK would ally with Germany and only when they declared war did he turn anti-British.
TheAchilles252 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he shound' really sad ... hitler was very happy to declare the war that fucckin scum!!!!
efelinfo 2 months ago
he shound' really sad ... hitler was really happy to declare the war that fucckin scum!!!!
efelinfo 2 months ago
A catastrophic decision on the part of Great Britain marking a major strategic mistake in getting involved in the quarrel between Germany and Poland and indeed trying to control and prevent Germany extending herself Eastwards which would have secured an early end to the Soviet Union and European Communism. Instead it resulted in a World War and the complete loss of the British Empire to the delight of both the USA and USSR,
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123
You're an idiot, Hitler was murdering innocent people in occupied territories. He was killing Jews, ethnic Poles and many others. His plan was to invade Soviet Union and completly destroy it and enslave its people, he viewed the Russians as "Untermensch" "Sub-Human" Britain could not sit there and say "I'm neutral". Britain always wanted to be viewed as the good! so they had no choice but to fight against the Nazis
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer You are a 'Sun' reader it seems, maybe thats where you learned your History or never looked at the wider less discussed reasons for war. Firstly ethnic Germans were brutalised and treated as unwanted immigrants in Danzig and many parts of East Prussia after the brutal terms of the 1920 Versailles Treaty.(you should investigate this further) Also It is wideley known that the Soviet Union under Stalin had already made plans for a pre emptive attack on Nazi Germany prior to 1941.
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123
You completely ignored what i said, i don't care about who invaded who it doesnt matter i do not like the Soviets or Nazis i hate them both. what i do care is the lives of innocent people, it is very well known that the Nazis murdered millions of innocent russians just because they were "Slavic" not Germanic. they also murdered millions of Jews but that has been mentioned many times so i wont bother. Soviets comitted crimes against the Germans to get revenge. i would do the same.
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer International Jews have been responsible for the indirect deaths of tens of millions in the third world through their ruthless greed and criminality, people like Lehman and Goldman Sachs group who caused yet another financial crisis as their forefathers did in 1929. They have nothing to answer for of course not. This was'nt an act of God or a routine 10 year event it was fraud on a massive scale .As for the Soviets, they killed raped and murdered their way across Germany.
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123
Where is your proof that the Soviet raped and murdered their way across europe?if you have no proof then i suggest you to shut up and listen to me. Nazis murdered 20 million people in Russia alone im not including Ukraine and Belarus. there wasn't anyone in russia who didn't lose a family member.in Belarus 1/3 population was murdered by the end of the war. if you would like proof just ask ill provide it. I'm not denying that the soviets comited crimes but they did it to get revenge
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer It is common knowlege and mainstream History that the Soviet hordes raped over 2Million German women. The German Army did not do the same, yes mainly because they regarded the Soviet Slavonic race as inferior. The War against the Soviet Union was one against its Jewish Bolshevist regime and to gain living space for the German people. The victories of 1941 were staggering and if the German Army had continued on to Moscow without delay in August 41 the war would have been won.
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123 Firstly I am German, secondly I had a relative in the German Army taking part in operation Barbarossa as part of Army Croup Centre so don't lecture me on the 'British' Bombing of German cities. The English and the Germans are blood relatives unlike you American or whatever mix part Russian half breed you may be. Essentially if England had joined with her cousins the Germans(Anglo Saxon & Germans) we would now be running the world not USA and Russia would be an advanced German state
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123
So wait a minite if you are fully aware that the Germans viewed the Soviets as inferior and commited crimes against them then why do u hate on them for raping 2 million german women? its like saying the germans had the right to do it but the soviets didn't. you should instead give them credit for getting revenge on them. wouldn't you do the same thing? if u were a soviet soldier ? if ur answer is NO then sorry something is wrong with u.
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer The Russians are inferior. The Germans would have colonized this bleak wasteland and turned its run down towns into thriving modern cities with roads and structure, rail and culture, just as the British had done in India and Southern Africa. No i would not have raped because I am a more cultured civilized human being than a Russian.
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123
So you/re a racist , you wasted my time i thought i was talking to an idiot, turns out hes an idiot and a racist.
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer What a complete cop out and excuse for not having a strong enough argument.......Loser!
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123
You have a mind of a Nazi. I dont negotiate with Nazi wannabes.
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer Have just checked out your page and you are a typical f...ked up American prick,. War lover rape lover! and general nut case. The USA I shit on your flag!
sidelock123 2 months ago
@sidelock123 hey im british, and what you just said was offensive. what did the usa do to you?
MrLjKiD1998 1 month ago
@MrLjKiD1998 If you are then you should realise they 'kindly' helped us out of our Empire and world position thanks to our stupid invilvement in an unneccessary Eastern European war. They are no closer related to the English and please note im saying the ENGLISH than the French. English-Anglo/Saxon=German, American-predominantly at that time mixed European and essentially Galic Irish decent.
sidelock123 1 month ago
@MaskedTehGamer You have little mind at all, you are a simple-man with little or no knowledge of life.
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
@sidelock123 We proud British would never have joined Hitler´s stupid war.Apart from a few fascist twats.Would you please stop talking such nonsense. At least do a bit of research before making stupid remarks.There are far more German-Americans than Russian or even Irish-Americans so please stop it,I bet even you know that it´s bollocks.My maternal grandfather is German and he fought in WW2.But he told me how he and his men felt betrayed by Hitler and Germany.Think before you talk.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi For your information-My Great Uncle was a soldier in the Waffen SS Das Reich regiment they were fighting communism and the dark satanic forces of International Jewish finance which is even today still trying to destroy the world in favour of naked power and greed! You have been brainwashed and should be ashamed to call yourself a German!
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 First of all I´ve never called myself German ......And secondly you´ve missed my point I said that it was wrong for you to say that Americans and Germans aren´t related because a LARGE NUMBER of Americans have got German ancestory.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi The Jews who fled Germany to the USA and Britain although the majority went to the USA , they and their sond and daughters say they have 'German ancestory', let me tell you they are no more German than you............
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 Well then let me tell you that a large amount of Germans that went over to the new continent,did so before Hitler was even born . Most of whom weren´t Jewish .Germans have been going there since America´s discovery and not only under Nazi rule.Those are facts and if you fail to accept them ,you should consider going back to history lesson number 1.You don´t want to tell me that all the English and Irish that went to America were all Jews, because that would be bollocks.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi No they just run your shit hole of a country.
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 Well I´ve never been to America so I suppose it wouldn´t be right to call it my country. My country is the United Kingdom of GREAT Britain and Northern Ireland. As well as the Republic of Ireland
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@sidelock123 HAHAHA!!! Yes, the country who's had exactly one non-protestant president (and he was a Catholic), had a President who ran on a 'I hate everyone who isn't a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant' platform, and who refused to take literally tens of thousands of Jews during WWII is run by Jews. HAHAHA!!! That's a good one! You filthy, stupid Nazis are always so entertainingly stupid!
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@sidelock123 Hmm your a nazi so get out of this english/usa made website
MyPearcy 1 month ago
@MyPearcy What an idiotic response. Mr no brains.......
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 It's most likely that the Red Army would have kept fighting even if Moscow had fallen, their arms industries would still be pretty much intact in the east and the Soviet industries outproduced the German industries.
jimmyn89SWE 1 month ago
@jimmyn89SWE That can be argued although it was the sheer speed and shock of the intial German attack on 22nd June and the pace of the advance that it may have been impossible for the re deployment of arms factories to the East and Siberia if Moscow had fallen in late September- mid October. Hitler made a decisive mistake in diverting South before the main attack on Moscow thereby losing the momentum of the attack and allowing not only the Soviet defences but the redeployment of their arms.
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 Some of their industries were already located in the east and the Soviets were quite effective at moving their industries, they were rebuilt and resumed production pretty quickly. And if even if German forces manages to reach Moscow they would still need to actually capture it, if it were to turn into a Stalingrad style house to house fighting it could be a long and bloody affair and while the Red Army could afford high casualties the Wehrmacht could not.
jimmyn89SWE 1 month ago
@jimmyn89SWE I dont thin Moscow would have been a Stalingrad situation as the city would have been fallen on before time for preperation of any significant defences in Sep 41.
The Germans could have easily dropped paratroops into the city and used panzer armies to surround the city suburbs. I think Moscow would have collapsed and Stalin would have pushed for peace terms. The entire networks of rail and road cenered on Moscow. It is unlikeley the Soviets could ever have come back from its loss.
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 Moscow would have been worse then Stalingrad. They couldn't have 'easily dropped paratroopers in', as that deep into Russia was uncontestedly red skies. Panzer armies would have been met by entire divisions of Tiger Tanks, and literally millions of infantry men. Stalin was a power-hungry lunatic. Peace was never considered. There was no situation, no matter how lucky Hitler was, where he got passed the Urals, and there were only a few where he could have come close.
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@jimmyn89SWE It is recored that in early October Stalin enquired deicreetly about sueing for peace and considered leaving just before the onset of an early winter that year. When the weather changed he decided to sit it out.
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 No. It isn't. Once Stalin came out of his multi-week seclusion, he came out raging against Germany and declaring that all of Russia would be in flames before they gave in. 14 time zones, the largest population, and the second largest wartime economy in the world. That's what the German Reich faced. No country in the world, not the United States, Great Britain, Germany or Japan, could overcome those first two alone. Germany lost the moment Stalin stood against them.
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@jimmyn89SWE You are correct. Sidelock is wrong. Terribly wrong, and completely ignorant of the capabilities of the USSR. By the time the US entered the war, the Soviet chiefs of staff had already moved most war productions into the unassailable Ural mountains, and the capture of Moscow would be insignificant as it would have taken literally months to actually capture it, while it would have only taken days to get out what the Reds saw as important: Stalin and the Chiefs of Staff.
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@Unilateralism Nonsense-The shambles of a country that the supreior German armies witnessed collapsed in the first few months after the start of Barbarossa. If Hitler has continued as planned to capture the then undefended Moscow the whole rotten state would have collapsed. PS I wont even embarass you by reminding you that the'Tiger' tank was German..................Please read some History instead of shitty communist propaganda from the time...PS Russia today is in no better shape politically.
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 HAHAHA!!! Have you ever read anhything about WWII outside of a grade school textbook? Within months of the beginning of Barbarossa, the Soviet army was drafting nearly a MILLION people a month. And there was no such thing as 'undefended' Soviet territory. The Soviet people wer so united against the Germans the entire Moscovy population would have literally just absorbed bullets long enough for Stalin and the Chiefs to escape. PS. I'm talking about the T-34 you idiot.
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@Unilateralism Idiot-My great Uncle served with 2nd SS Das Reich and we have his diaries from this period. You are obviously a Judeo Bolshevik and have no comprehension of truth. That shit hole- namely Russia would have been successfully colonized and the cities turned into modern ones with road and rail if the Germans had been victorious. The only reasons the Soviets had any success was the fact that the entire world were fighting against the German army and its economy !
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 LOL!!! I'm a Puerto Rican Libertarian you dult!!! And the rest of the world didn't join the fight until Germany was on its last legs. Hell, the US didn't even truly join the fight until D-Day. The Germans were strong, I'm not denying that. Large army, strong economy, and good training. However, once they forced Russia to access the raw potential associated with the largest population in the world, Germany didn't stand a chance.
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@Unilateralism Bullshit the German armies were superior in every way as was the equipment at that stage. The only thing that saved the Soviet Union in 41 was the weather and Hitlers failure to capture and occupy Moscow before its onset.
sidelock123 1 month ago
@sidelock123 No. They were not. At all. The German army outnumbered them 10-to-1, and the T-34 Tiger (not the German scrap heap you mentioned) was unmatched in armored warfare. And no, there was no '1 thing that saved the Soviet Union', there were around 20 million things that saved the Soviet Union, with about 19 million of them being Soviet soldiers, and the rest being the sum of Hitler's stupidity and Stalin's bland hatred.
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@sidelock123 As for your ignorant accusations that I am a communist: Joseph Stalin directly ordered the massacre of approximately 18 million people, and was a God awful human being. The Soviet Union as a whole was an abhorrent amalgum of authoritarian corruption and socialistic mistakes, and communism is a terrible system. However, their political mistakes should not take away from the fact that they could not be conquered, even though ignorant people like you insist it does.
Unilateralism 1 month ago
@sidelock123
Also it's funny how you sit there and blame the Soviet for commiting crimes in Germany near the end of ww2. at least they had a reason to, i mean 28 million people lost their lives in Soviet Union. but why dont u mention about the British crimes? British bombed Hamburg and killed 300,000 innocent germans, they had no right to do that! Germans did not comit and crimes against the Brits! in fact they offered them friendship.. you should be blaming ur evil country! not the soviets!
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer You are talking gobshite. The Germans bombed London and dozens of other British towns killing our people. They started the bloody war so it´s their fucking problem if they get bombed in response. Do you think it´s friendship the Germans offered no it wasn´t, and luckily the brave politicians of this great country never accepted their offer.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi
ok so the germans bombed london and klilled civilians and british in response bombed hamburg and other german cities. but why is it that when Germans not only attacked but also "INVADED" russia! and killed millions of people no one wants to talk about that or care. all they talk about it how russians raped 2m german women.
MaskedTehGamer 1 month ago
@MaskedTehGamer How can you say the Germans didn´t comit crimes during WW2 .That´s one of the must stupid things that I have ever heard.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi
Germany did commit crimes in the East. i don't know what you're smoking.
MaskedTehGamer 1 month ago
@MaskedTehGamer Everyone committed war crimes, the Allies more than most, we should quite simply have accepted the Jews Germany just wanted to deport - which was the Germans right.
angloengland 1 month ago
@angloengland The Allies committed more war crimes? Really... I could sit here all day listing Nazi atrocities perpetrated against allied pows and civilians of the occupied nations, which is pretty easy considering the crimes vastly outnumber anything the allies did. The Germans certainly did not have the right to deny Jews their rights, homes, property, livelihoods, then murder them by the train load.
Anders2185 1 month ago
@Anders2185 The NAZIs did have the right to deport Jewish people, the UK, USA and France did not have the moral right to deny entry to peoples whom could have been put at danger but they did. Their possessions I think is a separate issue, here in the UK for instance, most non-European immigrants came with nothing and brought no wealth into the country. Once war was declared after the NAZIs attempted to reunite their own country, the NAZIs could not feed or keep these people even if they wanted..
angloengland 1 week ago
@Anders2185 ...effectively by refusing to accept people no longer welcome by their host nation, the UK, France and the USA condemned them to death because they knew Germany could not feed the entire populous given war and blockades. I too could sit here all day listed Allied crimes against humanity. The UK and Frances cowardice to honour protection for Poland and ignore the USSRs invasion sums the Allies up after Versailles created the conditions for WW2.
angloengland 1 week ago
@angloengland haaha allies did not commit more war crimes than the axis.
NGC773 1 month ago
@MaskedTehGamer PS Have you been to Russia lateley, any reasons to say he was wrong............
sidelock123 2 months ago
Chamberlain... old bastard.
Idealist2011 2 months ago
My mom heard this radio address live. She was 12 years old and lived in Southampton England.
She did'nt know what aerial bombing was by but by the time she was 13 she sure as hell knew.
She said it was just bad luck she lived in a city that was a major target.
Ca1861 2 months ago
france declared war on germany aswell in was not just britain.
wilkinson8707 3 months ago
This is definately the greatest mistake by any politician ever. Neville was undoubly fighting for international jewry.
graddlar 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@graddlar Did you come to this opinion because you are homosexual ?
TheMossadShark 2 months ago
betrayed Poland
GrabarzLewicy 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Winston Churchill himself admitting that Hitler was not the reason for the British Empire to starttwo world wars on Germany:
"For over 400 years, it has been the policy of England, to oppose the leading power on the continent - whoever it may be (....) We do not fight a French republic, or a French Emperor, or a German republic, or the Hitler regime - we simply fight the leading power on the continent".
~ Churchill in a non-public speechg in the house of commons March 1936
Elberiver11 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Confront English, American or Polish people with their guilt for WW II, and they will immediately yell "poor Jews". As if the Jews had anything to do with WW II.
And by the way:
The over 3 Million German civilians, murdered by the "good" Allies after the war, apparantly are all "bad" people, and thus do not even deserve to be mentioned.
Some of them were put into barrels, nails pointing inside, then rolled downhill.
Americans and British have funny ideas of "liberation".....
Elberiver11 3 months ago
@Elberiver11 I feel unmoved by what you say. I also feel unmoved when I see the piles of burnt rotting German corpses in the aftermath of the Dresden bombing.
As Bomber Harris himself said "They sowed the wind, and now they shall reap the whirlwind".
wks1978 2 months ago
@wks1978 I feel similar about the victims of Germany, for Germany did not sow the wind - we did.
angloengland 2 months ago
@angloengland By "Sowing the wind" Harris was referring to the razing to the ground by the Germans of cities such as Warsaw, Rotterdam and Coventry. Also to the blitz on London.
Some seem to incorrectly view the bombings of German cities late in the war as unprovoked.
The Germans started the brutal tactic of carpet bombing cities and it should not come as a surprise to anyone that the allies felt compelled to follow suit.
wks1978 2 months ago
@wks1978 I understand what Harris inferred, however, NAZI Germany bombed Warsaw because it was a fortified city (which indeed it was), Rotterdam was bombed but no British or Allied city including Coventry had been bombed when the RAF resorted to bombing German cities. The Netherlands was a neutral nation and not an allied nation. The British used Rotterdam as an excuse to start this bombing and hugely exaggerated the victims of this bombing of Rotterdam (as usual) in order to justify this.
angloengland 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@angloengland Are you a homosexual ?
TheMossadShark 2 months ago
@angloengland They the RAF, started bombing cities because the Germans did it first, to Rotterdam. Nothing more needs to be said.
MrStig691 2 months ago 2
@MrStig691 Your simplistic view, like I said, hopefully won't be shared by modern victims and the wider Arab world of 'our aggression abroad' and the millions of dead we caused in Iraq through 'bombing them first'. Looks like with our Israeli allies fueling the fire that the US and Israel at least will be bombing Iran 'first' soon too.
angloengland 2 months ago
@MrStig691 Plenty needs be be said, we bombed German cities before they bombed ours. Thats it, simple. It was purely a political decision, just as ignoring the Soviet bombing of Helsinki and the Soviet invasion of Poland.
angloengland 2 months ago
@angloengland There wouldn´t have been any bombing If the Germans hadn´t started the war.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi The Germans wouldnt have started the war if the treaty of versailles din't bankrupt, humiliate and steal from them. So I suppose the blame lies with Britain and France following WWI - WWII was inevitable and really WWI part 2.
angloengland 1 month ago
@angloengland Well but we clearly know that Hitler´s aim was to secure or rather steal space for the Germans in eastern Europe. I don´t think that that was taking what we owed them not speaking of the murder of millions of jews, which had nothing to do with the unfair treatment of Germany, but rather Hitler´s sick phobia of jews. France´s invasion of the Rheinland wasn´t rectified but even more so Hitler´s handling of the situation.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi I think its best if we start from a position of what we all agree. I think we agree that Versailles stole large part of Prussia from the Germans. I think we agree that the NAZIs would have preferred all the Jews to have left Germany and created a problem for the UK, France and the USA instead. I think its clear that the UK, France and the USA did not want these people, maybe they thought it would have been an effective economic drain on Germany, maybe they just didn't want the...
angloengland 1 week ago
@crankpitititi ...Jews either. I think we agree that Germany at war could not feed its populous (many nations in this situation today) much as the UK couldn't, however the UK had effective control of the seas. I don't believe Hitler was scared of the Jews at all, ergo I am not scared of non-European immigrants, I know they are here un-democratically and hence illegally and I do not want so many, but I do not fear them at all. I do agree on Hitlers view of Eastern Europe. However unethical...
angloengland 1 week ago
@angloengland He was not scared of the Jews, he developed a hate for them cos his Jews mother died, and he thought it was unfair. and USA only joined as retaliation for purl harbor. And France was quickly occupied by Hitler. also USSR was not actively involved in the war till Hitler decided to invade them. If not for that mistake on his part the Nazis could have won the war, after all, USSR got to Berlin before us.
Messenger375 2 days ago
@crankpitititi ...gassing the Jews was, it resolved the issue of food production/ consumption in wartime Germany. I do believe that the number of Jews eliminated has been exaggerated however, the plague at Auschwitz itself being replaced illustrating a reduction of 2.5 million deaths at the camp. its also important to note that Jews only made up half the victims although you wouldnt know it from the propaganda.
angloengland 1 week ago
@angloengland true, Black, disabled and non natives were also gassed.
Messenger375 2 days ago
@angloengland Even though we are arguing here I don´t want our little conversation to end in insults and stupid commenting like they so often do on youtube. SO let´s keep the comments clean. BTW wish you a happy christmas who ever and where ever you are.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@crankpitititi Thats probably enough for us to start with, I do apologize for my delay in getting back here, I hope you had a great Christmas and a Happy New Year.
angloengland 1 week ago
@angloengland Yes indeed , hope that the same goes for you.
Well yes,but gassing gays and members of the political opposition is just as bad as gassing Jews. And in addition to that I think i´ts quite an extreme way of solving the food crysis. I think that the whole war was pointless and by the end of it Germany was in a worse state than ever.
crankpitititi 5 days ago
@crankpitititi aye they were, a lofe of bread cost 1000000marks, under Hitler Germany had a very week currency. Also closing to the end of the war, many areas of Germany were being bombed.
Messenger375 2 days ago
@crankpitititi I will state outright, no war is point less. It lowers the population, of an over crowded planet, brings large steps in science and tech. A major point of world war 2 was to stop an aggressive group taking control and committing genocide. Granted, there was the English empire at the time which is the biggest in history, however it had a democratic government, and was not out to eliminate a specific group.
Messenger375 2 days ago
@Messenger375 Totally agree with you it was a brave and important deed to stand in the way of Hitler and his allies.And take up arms. I should have stated my point more clearly, what I meant was Hitler starting the war was pointless and stupid at least to every non- Nazi (symphatiser)
crankpitititi 1 day ago
@MrStig691 So right my friend . Infact Germany wouldn´t have been bombed if they didn´t start the bloody war in the first place.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
@wks1978 Trying to justify this because it was against 'Evil NAZIs' is outdated, the NAZIs were nothing of the sort. To blame NAZI supporters for the millions of dead is like blaming the Labour supporters for the millions of Iraqi and Afghan dead. Lets hope in years to come that they don't take Harris' view.
angloengland 2 months ago
@angloengland Can you tell me if you find anal sex painful ?
TheMossadShark 2 months ago
@TheMossadShark You're pathetic. Grow up for god sake trawling the internet pretending to be a NAZI! All I stated is that war isn't so simple as to say these were bombed first. The treaty of Versailles was unfair and caused WW2 and the invasion of the Low Countries and France through the declaration of war. Human losses are also hugely exaggerated, I'm sure you're aware that the first plague at Auschwitz stated 4m victims, this has been replaced with a plague stating 1.5m died. Another example
angloengland 2 months ago
@angloengland 1.5 or 4 where´s the difference it´s just as stupid and horrible.
crankpitititi 1 month ago
Limeys declared a war against Germany and lost their empire because of a bunch of polish toilet plumbers. Churchill was a fool anyway. Fatboy Winston used to show up some meetings naked.
hijacker050 3 months ago
@hijacker050
I don't mean to be rude man. But your looking foolish with this comment. ON behalf of the Netherlands and several western European countries that are free today I thank them for the effort. They may have lost their empire but they tried to defend an important principle. The right for sovereign nations to self determination and freedom from racist tyranny.
summer20105707 3 months ago
I feel so sorry for him. He made such a fool of himself when he came back with the peace letter from Germany
J4K31 3 months ago
Poor bastard...he sounds so crushed.
hotelmario510 3 months ago
rw
2008Sameoldfitup 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you know that Christianity is correct? The world around us reveals that G-d DOES exist, and the historical evidence reveals that Jesus Christ really did come to this earth and there is overwhelming evidence that Jesus Christ really did physically rise from the dead. Jesus is coming again and the signs of the end times that were foretold in the Bible are coming to pass.
marionetemanJ 3 months ago
Whilst aiming for peace also Chamberlain was rearming - much like Hitler. If anything Chamberlain's delay potentially saved Britain
TheMizark89 3 months ago 2
@TheMizark89 i'd be interested if you have any facts on this... it's a nice idea but i think realistically, chamberlain really believed hitler