Added: 2 years ago
From: WilliamShatner
Views: 44,394
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (348)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The movie sucked. No question. The story was awful. The acting of the "new kids on the Enterprise" was horrible. The only light in that dark tunnel were Karl Urban and of course Leonard. Thank you Karl for making ST XI a little more tolerable.

  • I did a stopmotion that centers on McCoy.

  • I've loved Karl Urban since Xena. I was so psyched to see him as McCoy in the new Trek. He's awesome!

  • I'd like to start off saying I love this movie, and Bones overall. But I found another difference between this Bones and the other. In The Original Series Bones couldn't do the Vulcan salute, but here, at the end, we clearly see him doing the Vulcan salute.

  • I still haven't stopped watching it!! I thought they were all excellent and I hope they do a series of new stories with the new crew. I know hundreds of Trekkies, Trekkers, whatever who feel the same way!!

  • In many ways, he probably had the toughest task in recreating a character. No disrespect to the rest of the fine cast, but McCoy was so specific in his HUMAN emotions and speech, that role could've tanked very hard.

  • I thought Mr. Urban was able to channel the energy of his counterpart, Deforest Kelley, the most out of the Kirk-Spock-McCoy triangle. He did a fantastic job, and I could hear Kelley's McCoy coming out through him the entire movie. He did a wonderful job :)

  • A fine actor in a fine performance in a TURD of a movie, a pure emotionless glassy action romp selling itself on a young-stud bromance angle, a sassy black chick angle, pure BS

  • lookd more mccoy than mccoy ~

  • He's fucking hot.

  • Karl Urban was a pleasant Curve Ball from Left Field in his Portrayal as Dr. Mc'Coy. His characterization was dramatic and dramatic. This demonstrates his range of acting skill. I saw him in Lord of the Rings on opening night and he was more than the part he played there.

    As Dr. Mc'Coy on future missions he expanded the depth character and showed Mc'Coy's undisplayed skills.

    Dr. Mc'Coy was like the kind uncle who would never yell at you when you were at his house. He will become # 1

  • @Roadracer987654321 all I remember was mccoy throwing little tantrums around kirk and spock in the original movies :)

  • Mmm.

    Anyone who can use ballistic in a sentence with THAT accent is already reeking of awesome.

    Star Trek was great-and so were you, Karl!

  • I completely agree =]

  • "ballistic and sexy" ay? I'll drink to that. I thought Karl Urban was amazing in it

  • Good choice for Bones but he could never replace Deforest he just can follow! R.I.P. Deforest, you´ve alway been and allways will be the best "highest illogical, red-blooded, old country doctor" from here to the Neutral Zone!

  • Sinese resembles Kelley more facially and in

    body type, and I like the guy as an actor, but he's older now (54) than Kelley was (49) when TOS ended. Abrams was going for a young cast, younger than the original; Urban is 17 yrs younger than Sinese. Wish Sinese had been younger, but I was very happy with Urban's portrayal of my favorite TOS character.

    Not that he can replace De . . . .

  • Amen.

    haha

  • Gosh, Karl's resemblance to Deforest is nearly uncanny.

  • I love this man. He is awesome in almost everything he's in. Can't say everything he's in is awesome *cough*Doom*cough* but he manages to be awesome even in crappy movies.

    Oh, and Star Trek rocked. :)

  • He really was 'McCoy' in this movie!!! He was a better actor than everyone else...I really thought I was watching Deforest Kelley in every scene....he stole the show!!!

  • @robdsires agreed. if u close your eyes he sounds and talks exactly like him

  • I thought that his performance as bones was dead on!  I loved it!

  • I love his voice! He sounds so calm and collected. Sigh, what a great Bones.

  • you know i watched star trek reboot, not knowing it was KArl urban at the time playing bones cause all I can think about is Damn Bones is hot and kept telling my friend in the seat next to me till she told me to shut up XD I love kiwi Karl just as much as I lvoe Johnny Depp and trust me that is a lot.

  • The new Mel Gibson.

  • i could watch karl urban sleep...or work out...or shower...but he was also a scary great mccoy!

  • I don't care how awesome Urban is, DeForest Kelley IS Dr. McCoy, no one else can possible come close to his awesomeness. Plus, his eyebrow raise is classic, and Urban doesn;t have those odd U eyebrows.

  • I don't know, Urban did an amazing job. Captured the essence of Dr. McCoy beautifully, just as the other actors nailed their characters.

    But I must agree with you; there will never be another DeForest Kelly, and he IS Dr. McCoy.

  • Karl Urban did an amazing job. And it sucks how he, like Pegg, didn't have the original actors for their characters to turn to for advice.

  • Karl Urban did a great job as McCoy. But seeing this reminds me that I believe (without checking) Mr. Urban played the KGB agent trying to kill Jason Bourne in the Bourne Supremacy.

  • This was one awesome movie. In part because of his excellent portraying of the Doctor. A cynical, grouchy bastard.

  • Urban doesn't have McCoy's southern accent though. Did he have one in the new movie or what? I'm excited for the DVD to come out!

  • No, he spoke in his native New Zealand accent...D'OH!

    What do you think you idiot?

  • I didn't get to see the movie you fucktard. BACK OFF!

  • wow, grow the hell up you little brat.

  • I will the moment the rest of youtube (including you) does.

  • You are a pathetic brat, I was right. You are undeserving of anyone's respect or politeness ever in life.

    Change it or you will find that you will continue to fail hard.

  • You have no idea what your talking about. I don't even know why you are insulting me! (Probably because I don't take time to remember meaningless conversations on youtube.) However, yeah we are both failing hard for even arguing online. No one really wins.

  • On the contrary, I do. I'm insulting you because you deserve it. YOU are failing hard for being a stupid brat. I don't care about winning; I care about giving you the hard time you earned for yourself.

  • Wow, you have officially proven that you have no life. Goodbye.

  • LMAO, is that the best you have? Not only is it a brat, it's a stupid brat.

  • yes, it's called ACTING

  • Karl urban is awsome

  • Pine as "young" Kirk got the green chick. Urban as "young" Kirk would've got Ohura

    Shatner as "young Kirk" would've got them both with Spok holding the camera

    lol

  • LOL. Nice! However it's "Uhura" and "Spock"! ;-)

  • details

  • This actor did a great job as McCoy! Nicely done!

  • Good film and Karl played Bones brilliantly. Shame Simon Pegg ruined Scotty.

  • Simon just needed some space zombies to kill!

  • Oh he did not! He was an awesome Scotty, and I'd like to see you do better.

  • och aye the noo.

    See I did a better job already.

  • I'm sorry, I forgot I was talking to a dumbass. Thanks for reminding me, my bad.

  • He was the best at portraying his character (Bones) in the new movie, I thought.

  • I haven't seen this film yet, perhaps I'm one of the few. To comment...ST was never about hype, Gene Rodenberry's vision was not always fighting an enemy, more of an engagement of minds much to his credit. So wher is Gene in all of this?

  • Turner: I agree with you. The only problem is, since Berman & Co. drove the Post-Roddenberry Trek off the rails, it required a reboot. Think of the new movie as the opportunity to open the Star Trek door to generations of fans who never cared about Star Trek's vision of the future. Now that the "Intro" is over, hopefully in the next movie, they'll get back to what made Trek special. Gene's vision can be repackaged for kids who never knew what we Trekkers & Trekkies grew up with. Baby steps.

  • You have a point, but I think you'll like it anyway, if you see it. It's perhaps not the best new Star Trek movie that a new Star Trek movie could be, but I certainly felt that it was well above average for a recent hollywood movie.

  • Ok, yes I have taken that on board (scuse the pun) just have to get to the bloody cinema! which is harder than you think, might be box office statistics..ie which bus do you get?

  • It's not the best Trek but I agree it's way better then most of Hollywood's recent offerings.

  • It was a very good movie, and captured the spirit of the show very nicely. Everyone played their roles just about perfectly and I hope to see another movie to follow it; while The Voyage Home will always be my favorite Trek movie, this one was right up there, imo.

  • This movie was really good in my opinion because they used original lines from the show. The lines we all remember and love. People who see this movie and never saw the Original series will get what's going on ad people who like me have been watching since we were sitting on our father's lap will appreciate how well it was made. The characters were really good, the story was great, and it was all around enjoyable. GET OVER YOUR SELF CENTERED EGOS AND KEEP YOUR CRAP TO YOURSELVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • For my part in any self-centered egotistic crap-ness... I truly, humbly, apologize.

    -Yoda

  • Okay. I have been reading the comments on this video and I have to say that your all going WAY too far with this. This Star Trek movie was meant to be set in an alternate reality. MEANING that DUH! of course it is going to be different from the original Star Trek show because it is set DIFFERENTLY. People who didn't like this movie are entitled to their opinion, I may not think they're right but IT IS THEY'RE OPINION!!!!

  • bones was the only good character there he really was bones the others suck they were too stiff especially Spock he is way too violent

  • you forget the first episode, and some others - Spock yelled alot and had an attitude.....he was finding his earth/volcan mind.

  • i think hwse awesome.. he acts nuts when he first entered the soace shuttle but then he eventually goes past his fears. also he says some funny stuff

  • He was brilliant as McCoy. My favorite in the new movie! Now I see why he was such a perfect McCoy, haha.

  • So sad he couldn't meet Mr. Kelly.

  • That guy is so spot-on as Dr McCoy, it's Scary!

  • Totally! He is cute...Karl Urban that is..

  • Okay, kiddies. 40-YEAR STAR TREK FAN HERE. The new movie ROCKS. Yeah, there are new actors in the old roles. This is bad how, exactly? The only roles in drama that get recast with new actors are the SUCCESSFUL ones. If you'd rather see the old cast, all the old stuff is still there!

    The movie is a brilliant re-imagining. It's fun, sexy, and NOT BORING. (I gave up after TNG, and I didn't even like that much.) I hope there are more, because...DAMN.

  • I admit it, I'm too young to be a genuine Trekkie. I can't speak Klingon and when I stepped into the theater, the only character I really recognized was Spock. That said, I love this movie, Bones is my favorite character, and I've spent the past few days trying to catch up with the original series. Without this movie, I never would have cared to watch the classics, so I owe it that much. In any case, it beats the new Star Wars and X-men movies, so I don't know why people are complaining.

  • Amen sista (sista?)!!! I'm right there with you. I've heard some of the more popular lines (i.e. Live long and prosper. He's dead Jim. etc...) and only knew Spock but I never could get into this. Thanks to the movie I've started watching TOS and actually love the characters of that one as much, if not more, than the ones of the movie. You get to see more of what makes them tick. And now I know Star Wars was ripped off...and am a tad disappointed... :(

  • A great deal of people here agree that Carl did a great job of McCoy. Kudos to you people for acknowledging a job well done. McCoy lives!

  • TheRentschmeister: yes i understand that all trekkies/trekkers didnt bitch about it. but i was reffereing to those who did. and yes i am with you....you are absolutely correct.

  • this movie was awesome and ive been a trekkie since i can remember.....im 15 and i wanted all my other friends to be able to enjoy star trek...and all you "trekkies" who are bitching about it: GET A DAMN LIFE. YOU PEOPLE ARE THE REASON EVERYONE ELSE AUTOMATICALLY ASSUMES TREKKIES ARE 45 YEAR OLD VIRGIN NERDS WHO LIVE IN A BASEMENT. IN OTHER WORDS, GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS.

  • Comment removed

  • Striker: Not all Trekkies (or in my case Trekkers) bitch about the new movie. There are many of us who understand that Berman & Co. KILLED Star Trek and that it needed to be resurrected. They hate the fact that the movie needed a generic reboot to get Trek back on track. They hate the fact that this movie has been the most SUCCESSFUL Star Trek Movie EVER this fast in the cinemas. These pukes hate the fact the movie's success shows people LOVE IT.

  • This is rather short-sighted, dontcha think? Trekkies hate this movie because it was successful? Please, I like to think the general Trek fandom is a little more open-minded than that. If they hate it, it's because they genuinely did not like it for itself, not because of the circumstances surrounding its creation and success.

  • Human nature is human nature. The typical Human abhors change. Throughout the years I've spent watching Trek, Who, etc. it is always the same song and dance. "This guy isn't as good as that guy" or "that storyline is too soapy". To take your "insight" into perspective,if someone simply "hates" the new Trek because from their perch on Mt. Olympus it isn't "up to snuff" where are they cheering the fact that the VISION of Roddenberry's view of humanity's future CONTINUES i.e. not killed by Berman?

  • whoa, you guys need to chill. after all, it is just a movie, and people are entitled to their own opinions. even you.

  • The "Darkness and Silence" line is one of the coolest movie lines I've ever heard. Too bad it was one jewel, in a sea of sewage.

  • I am a die hard original Star Trek fan. I didn't like the movie - it was a bit too much to accept what they have done with the "Star Trek universe" - but however, I have to say Carl did a wonderful job as McCoy - he really pulled it off. His was the best effort. I cringed at Simon Pegg's Scotty - was it all a big joke or something? Total flunk JJ on that one! The rest were "ok" but Carl's McCoy was a work of art. Brilliant, mate!

  • I actually really enjoyed Scotty, and all the characters except for Kirk. He was really annoying, particularly in the Kobayashi Maru scenario. And I don't think Spock would've been that easy to goad.

    What I didn't like were some of the major plot points, and the complete lack of respect for science killed any credibility the movie had.

    It was still a fun ride if I turned my brain off.

  • "and I don't think Spock would've been that easy to goad" Really??? Yet again, as Trek has done COUNTLESS TIMES when the PAST IS CHANGED -----ALL------ events that are related in the future are CHANGED (Temporal Prime Directive anyone?) Nero on his Borg/Romulan hybrid ship changed the Federations FUTURE by changing it's past, thereby affecting COUNTLESS lives. "Complete lack of respect for science" Yes, it was better to leave Trek murdered by Berman & Co. No need to reboot when you have reruns?

  • Yeah, I see your point. The one other thing that annoyed me was that the Enterprise engine room was very cartoonish - a never ending vista of PIPES - WTF? And the bridge was too overboard with lights and LEDs How could anybody on that ship get any work done - not very work freindly, unlike the TV series bridge.

  • When did this new Star Trak movie come out? Is Capt. Picardo in it or Capt. Jameways? I will go check at the dvd store. Thaks for the heds up!

  • Have you been living under a rock? It's still in theatres I think, wont be on DVD yet. It's a remake of the original, so no janeways or picards.

  • Theaters! Ok. Thanks. does. Carl Urban play Deforesta Kellie's son in this movie?

  • I am an old trekker, but i must admit that Karl made a fantastic job and he is telling the truth. New Star Trek is not only for old funs but for new too....

  • I'd hit karl like a bus, hes so hot.

  • scotty was played well by shawn of the dead .

  • *Cough* Simon Pegg. *cough*

  • yea him lol

  • Karl Urban did a great job in the new movie, they all did, and I can't wait for the next one.

  • Who was doing the interview?

  • Yes! It's back!

    I couldn't agree more with Karl Urban.

    But we ( the fans) always knew that Star Trek was phenomenal and sexy !

    yeahhhh!

  • Loved Urban as McCoy - he really filled Bones' shoes nicely....

    it's a great film...

  • McCoy: "...I like this video! It's hilarious!"

  • Star Trek XI was Great! :)

    Karl Urban Rules! =D

  • best actor in the film. he was the truest to the original character, probably because he was already a trek fan.

  • I agree. To me, he felt the closest to the original cast. He did a great job.

  • He did do a great job. Him, Nimoy and the ILM FX crew are what saved the film from being crap.

  • Fantastic job done by Karl Urban as McCoy for sure

  • Urban is one fine actor. The best two scenes, which he recaptured the original McCoy were the first encounter with Kirk, and the short conversation with Spock, 'Are you our of your Vulcan mind!?"

    Urban did capture the expressions of De Forest very nicely. Before they had the casting of the new film, I always envisage Gary Sinise as McCoy. But seems like Karl Urban did a very very good job.

  • You know .. i always thought Gary Sinise would have made a great McCoy..You are the only other on the planet that agrees with me.. thank you

  • it took me awhile but the new film has really grown on me. It's now my third favorite. Right behind Star Trek 2 and 4. :)

  • I respect that. However I'd rank 3 and 6 ahead of this one as well as 2 and 4. Ditto for "First Contact". So I'd say maybe the fifth best Trek film? 5 out of 11 ain't bad.

  • Mr. Shatner is all class to post things like this on his channel. I loved the new movie, but nothing beats Wrath of Kahn in my books!

  • Amen. "Wrath of Khan" is the true High Point of the Star Trek franchise. "Nemesis" tried to clone it. This film's weak spot is they needed a villain as memorable as Khan but Nero was flat. Not only was he no Khan he was no Chang, Kluge or Q. That and Pine's weak Kirk where the films weak spots. Still an enjoyable movie however and a decent start for Trek 2.0.

  • Who should play Khan if they remake The Space Seed storyline? In reality they should get a real Indian. (Bollywood would have many prime candidates) However lets go for stunt casting! Either Antonio Banderas or Wilmer Valderrama!

  • I think Tim Allen would make a great Khan !!! but it would not work since Kirk and Khan had about the same age so they would have to go with a younger actor.

  • Tim Allen did a absolutely BRILLIANT rift on Shatner in "Galaxy Quest" (the best Trek film since "Undiscovered Country" even if it's not really a Trek film!) but how the hell do you see him as Khan? Even in a comedy skit? Although Dana Carvey did a hilarious Khan on SNL. P. S. I want Galaxy Quest 2!!!

  • Urban is my favorite part of the movie.

  • I think the new Star Trek movie was a brilliant move from the writers! To take us down a path that parallels what we've known for 43 years and create an open door for a future with characters we've loved and developed expected reactions from while still maintaining the true trek experience... Brilliant! I expect to see many more movies from this "new" crew and their untold future...

  • He's bang on the money with his "Bones"..I was mesmerized..

  • I loved the new movie! but i hope they give Bones some more air time.. he wasn't in it long enough!

  • I agree - he stole the show. Practically CHANNELED DeForest Kelley!

  • "Star Trek is ballistic, it's sexy and it's BACK."

    Absolutely the best thing about the new movie is that it's brought the sexy style of The Original Series back after an absence of nearly 40 years. This is what has re-ignited the franchise and I think if JJ can embrace this while also concentrating on the cerebral aspects of the franchise, we'll be onto a winner.

  • I just knew he was a lifelong Trekkie- he seemed to really get the Bones character on an elemental level. I LOVED Karl Urban in the new movie! DeForrest Kelley can be proud to have such a successor to his role.

  • Can I get peanut butter here?

  • He was really great as McCoy, the best of the cast imo.

  • He did an awesome job honestly I'm looking forward to a revitalised franchise with this group, REALLY kickass and a great premise for a new TV show even.

    I loved the scenes where he was going : "I can fix this, I can fix this!" lollll

  • As a die-hard TOS fan, I was not expecting to like this movie at all. How they presented it was brilliant. Now I don't have to care that the bridge isn't the same or the uniforms aren't the same and all that. As much as I appreciated to the extremes they went to recreate the TOS bridge in TNG and ENT, I enjoyed the newness of this movie.

    By far Karl's McCoy was the best character in the movie. It was like Deforest himself was channeling McCoy right into him. Karl is the star of this movie.

  • Thank you, EddieAngstrom! Karl Urban was the best thing about this "Spit at Gene Roddenberry's vision!"

    This film is NOT for fans of the original "Star Trek!"

    It's "Dawson's Enterprise!"

    Or is it, "Beverly Hills: NCC-1701."

    No! It's "Star Trek: Abrams' Folly!"

  • So I take it you didn't like the movie? Or have you even watched it?

    All kidding aside, I thought it was a good movie. I enjoyed it and I'm a big fan of the original series. The film had a different feel to it I admit, But the way I see it, if I can accept all the other incarnations of Star Trek, I see no reason not to accept this one.

  • My sentiments exactly. The very nature of Star Trek encourages the embracing of change. It's almost difficult to fully enjoy Star Trek without keeping an open mind.

  • Finally, someone understands.

  • What are you bitchin about? It's not like J.J. can go back in time, and hijack the original cast, bring them to the future and star them in this film.

    This was a good start to reigniting the franchise! Which is WHAT WAS NEEDED after the shit that was known as the "Generations" films, and that sad crap that was "ENTERPRISE".

    Take it at face value, enjoy it, and stop over-ANAL-izing it. enjoy it for what it is, a story that stands on it's own regardless if you have seen a Star Trek film before.

  • I was not over analyzing this film. I have been watching "Star Trek" since September 8, 1966. "Face value?" It was a science fiction film that contained elements of "Star Trek." That's where the similarity ends. Besides there were WAY too many plot holes. A cadet fresh out of the academy is made captain of the flagship? This Kirk might have been honored with a medal and a parade for his daring do, but never his own ship.

    Can you tell that I did not like this film?

  • Dude, even according to Trek History, BEFORE this film, James Tyberius Kirk was the Youngest Man in starfleet to be promoted to Captain. Thats cannon. They showed you the Kobyashi Maru and how he beat it. thats cannon. There was TONS of story referencing throughout, but keep in mind there's only so much story you can tell in about 2 hours. My only complaint was it wasn't long enough. I'm sorry you didn't have a good time and enjoy it. Everyone i know did, and i'm taking my mom to see it!

  • Well, the issue is moot anyway, because Nero's time travel created the parallel universe in which the events of the movie take place. The universe in which the original Star Trek exists still exist, this universe i parallel, with some differences. So this one can stand alone and they can change things, and retain some canon items. But it's also a new sandbox to play in.

  • Fail; it's been the best movie of 2009 thus far

  • Technically Yes, but if you remember Doctor Browns Explaination of Time travel from back to the future, time has been altered from a particular point in space, so if you go forward, it will be the future of that fracture. The only way to repair the timeline is to travel back to the instant that Nero showed up, and erase his interference with history.

    Besides, where the hell was Daniels at? Why didnt Star Fleet send him back to fix it like he did in Enterprise (Snicker Snicker).

  • Oh yeah that's right, he's still fighting that whole Temporal-Cold war by His self.... HAHAHA

    Now THAT was the biggest Star Trek joke in History! Temporal Cold War indeed...

    What i cant explain... is that regardless of what series, the whole Mirror Universe eps are considered to be the very best of Trek anyway, why hasn't some hollywood moron capitolized on that and made a "mirror, mirror" series?! Inquiring minds want to know...

  • I agree. That 2 hours went by fast. Can't wait for the bluray to see what all they cut out.

  • What?! Enterprise was a hell of a lot better than this crap...

  • enterprise was terrible. there's a reason it was cancelled.

  • The first two seasons of Enterprise had only a few jewels in its run. I particularly liked "Cogenitor" and was surprised at how much I liked "Regeneration." The third season was excellent, and really captures what Star Trek is all about. The fourth topped that with so many homages to the rest of the Trek universe. I thank them so much for adding Trek novelists to the writing staff. But it was too little too late, so it was canceled.

  • Yeah right, dude! Enterprise was a Lumbering Dinosaur. It was too "family" and cutesy oriented, with shows like "Lost", "Law and Order", and "CSI" playing to the more adult crowd. Face it, you make a show only kids will watch and thats all you get as viewers Especially when Dad has the remote.

    FARSCAPE was a much better show than Enterprise ever thought about being. Or Stargate SG-1/Atlantis for that matter.

  • the best eps of Enterprise was "In a mirror Darkly" 2 part ep. The rest of it may as well be a shit stain in your underwear.

  • Dude, you need to get laid soooooooo bad.

  • Dude, if you think appreciating a beautiful females body means that someone "needs to get laid".........that illustrates that you actually don't get laid very often.

  • If you were "getting laid often" you wouldn't need to surf commercial TV for T&A. Besides it was a joke. Get a sense a humor for Pete's sake.

  • Joke away. Oh and we all know how much tail dressing in your Star Trek jammies... I mean "uniform" can get you! Besides I've never wore an "outfit" except for Halloween or a movie.

  • Unless you mean a genuine military uniform then I can say more power to ya. My grandfathers where WWII Heroes and my Dad served in 'Nam so I have respect for Our Troops. I would have served but bad shit happened. (If you saw my channel you'll know what I mean.) Boy this got serious all of a sudden..lol

  • "Shits N Giggles" is what YouTube is about And while I respect that you serve, (I honestly do) WTF does that have to do with anything? And how is saying "you need to get laid" a "HOSTILE ACT"? Are you THAT insecure about your manhood? Has showering with naked men made you so confused you can't take a little joke so that's why you need to play the BIG HERO FIREMAN card? BTW REAL HEROES don't have to beat their chest and shout it out, although it's obvious why you feel the need to...

  • Your the one who played the Hero card with this "I'm a Hero fireman so how dare you make fun of me" I come from a family of war vets. None of them ever bragged about it. I didn't even know about my grandfather's medals for heroism until he passed . - If you need to be told when someone is joking your an idiot. And for going all nuts over a little joke, how insecure are you? Only the insecure need to brag about supposed heroic and sexual exploits. It's called posturing, look it up.

  • So saying you need to get laid (and what guy doesn't?) is a "Hostile Attack" but it's kosher for you to call me Douch, Felcher and Bruno? Gee you're the one who seems to be obsessed with homosexuality while claiming you *love* the ladies. Your right about one thing (semantically), you didn't use the WORD "Hero", you just started bragging about supposedly being a fireman/ex-service man "with medals" - which in no way pertained to the conversation. -You bore me. Have fun in fantasy land.

  • You the one who keeps bringing up homosexuality. I made one allusion it mentioning you shower with men (which if you are a fireman, you do.) and no more. Sounds like your projecting your own fantasies.( I didn't even know what a "felcher" is until I looked it up. It's telling that you know.) Your really quite childish, it's comical. Unlike you I I don't care what some wanker says about me, I just love getting under the skin of a self-obsessed assholes like you.

  • As for my grandfather's service. I mentioned it to illustrate how a TRUE decorated Hero doesn't go around bragging about it. While he told me stories about the war he never mentioned his heroism or his medals. Just like how my dad doesn't go around telling everyone he was in 'Nam when it doesn't pertain to the conversation. I can safely say your a fraud. no one with your supposed background would be so pathetic. Your an insult to our real Heroes and I've known quite a few.

  • You're the one that has the fixation on homosexuality. Quite the charade, the only way you've ever risked your life is to post all this repetitive crap pass your bedtime. However I will be the bigger man. I'm sorry that in my OP I insinuated you would want to have sex with a real woman, you much prefer to vocalize how hot plastic chicks are and then project your gay tendencies on others. Your nonsense is getting terribly repetitive and I've exposed you for the fraud you are so I'm done. Adios.

  • You actually think calling me names and repetitively making assertions that I'm a homosexual is going to bother me? What are you, twelve? (If not physically then emotionally and psychologically.) In fact I'll give you a thrill. I'M GAY! I LOVE THE C*** And since I'm gay I have Gaydar and it's clear your a closet case! Since your so obsessed with my sexuality I'll let you toss my salad and fulfill those burning desires you have for me. Mess your pants yet little guy? (Apologies to any real gays)