ATI hd 5000 series is fail on tessellation!!! so its fail in DX11 so fuck this 5000 series the 6000 series is good but the 500 series of nvidia is a lot better
Even a crappy looking RTS (Real Time Strategy) can kill your CPU & GPU even after 10 years.
All it has to do is to spam particles and units and misc. objects onto your screen.
I've got a lot of respect for Half-Life 2, because it was still good looking even after 4 years, even though it didn't require a killer-PC at launch (unlike Crysis)
@Nolonar thats an interesting comment. Can you give a name a 10 year old game (of any kind). That I can't play at full quality today on even an average pc?
Sure, your CPU will have trouble managing all those units, but if those units have lots of particles attached to them (like smoke), your GPU might run into troubles as well.
Also, the more units you have, the more taxing shadow casting will be.
The thing is: games nowadays try to skip rendering process (you don't need to render what you don't see), something that older games probably lack.
@XHighWarlordGigglesX But in the end, my point was to say: Just because an "old" game is ressource hungry, it doesn't mean it is any impressive.
For example, I've once written a program that draws a little landscape (with a mountain, trees and water). It looks like crap compared to Crysis, it doesn't have any animated objects nor particles and it barely runs with 50 FPS, even though my PC can run Crysis 1 maxed out in FullHD with no less than 40 FPS.
@LOLMAN22 Bad Company 2 takes less performance to run, both graphics cards would be capped at 60 FPS with vsync on so there wouldn't be any competition.
@JeemOfRunescape exactly i find it funny how all the amd fans compare their dual gpus to nvidia single gpu and they get 10fps more and they think its a victory. Now dont get me wrong if amd did make a single gpu card that was powerful enough to be the best single gpu then i would definitely pat them on the back cause thats something theyve never done or at least not done in a loooooong time
I think there was something wrong with this 480 because my 460 gets about 1-2 fps less in this test :\ 1080 res max settings. hmm well anyways i think the 480 (besides this test) does quite well as single gpu as no single gpu card (from ati) can beat it.
@mrshzzit1 dx10 has instanced tessellation and i have 2 460's which beat that 480 by quite a few frames since i have a mobo with extremely high bandwidth. and its not very respectful to call someone elses hardware shit. I think you need to spell check before you reply as well. My card was doing dx10 at the time. I realized later on that his specs overall were less than mine so that was another benefit to my card because my system only has 3% bottleneck(tests..) where a normal computer has 30-40%
Why is crysis still so hard to run!! Considering crysis is almost 5 years old now and a dual gpu card that costs like 800 dollars cannot run it at a constant 60 fps
@Therafaelcoleto WRONG! HD 5970 is only 300$ or so now. GTX 480 is basically the same price, who wins? HD 5970 of course, way better performance and still #1.
3D will be satisfying in about 3 years. Just like xFire/sli was shit when it first came out, now xfire's more efficient + powerful with the 6000 series.
Is This rig worth 1250Dollars? Corsair OBsidian 800D Corsair AAX 1200W Asus rampage 3 extreme intel core i7 950 corsair 12gb 1600mhz XMS3´ intel 80GB SSD 500GB samsung 500GB WESTERN 5970 Black edition 2GB with cooler Corsair G50 Nzxt sentry LX and a 26"monitor from ASus he has builded it from 28K
@houari2009 Don't you think if they can put another Gpu they have already did that?? When they figurate how to put then yes Nvidea will crush Ati... but intil then Ati is better... I don't understand why this fight with defenders of Nvidea and Ati, does not metter, what metter is in wich card is better in this time, will always comes better sometime Ati other Nvidea.
Ati Radeon HD 5970 actually, the fastest graphic card in the world: 4 GB DDR5, supports 6 displays (HDMI) until , proccesor speed 4.8 teraflops..... F***** Goooooooooood! Nvidia sucks!
@nikoeng4 lol then why did gtx 480 cost nearly same price as 5970? and clearly 5970 is about 30% faster then 480 in gaming, mabye not in tenssilation. i can still remember gtx 480 cost about £460 pounds and 5970 about £480-500. and from looking at price point of view gtx 480 was a fail compared to 5970. anyhow hardly any games currently uses tensilation, except metro 2033 name me any game which uses it. bet you wont have many in ur head lol if you dont use cuda cores then ati always the no1.
i agreed that gtx480 set at the bad price ,heat and slow than 5970
and that's why fail compare~idiot also will know that gtx480,470 fail product
but now days
The most important factor, beyond framerates, is the visual quality and experience returned by the product. The GeForce GTX 580 allows a more immersive, smoother, and consistent quality of gameplay
a evga nvidia gtx580 FTW hydro copper2 will knock the pants off anything out there
Ati= better performance, lower price. Nvidia = lower performance, higher price, better technology. I personally, i would buy the latest Nvidia cards, even though, the Ati is way cheaper.But we all know the Nvidia cards got better technology(cuda, physx, etc).just my opinion....dont try to eat my head guys!Cheers.
does anyone know if the ATI HD 5970 is still the best graphic card out there? i got one now, really consider buying one more and add the i7 980x to it
@SiIXEN037 yes it is still the fastest card out there...this is a list of all graphic cards if u want to chek it for yourself pc-erfahrung.de/grafikkarte/vga-grafikrangliste.html
i dont think ati is great,my ati hd mobil. 5470 runs 3dmark 06 at first graphic test only at 6 ~8 FPS but NVidia 8600 GT have 20~25 FPS at the graphic test. (I,m not Nvidia fanboy)
even though 5970 won, i still like nvidea fermi cause it has directx 11 and physx...till ati gets something better, then i will still love fermi (the ati multiple screen doesn't matter to me)
@NvideaMan808 Umm.. Dude you do know the HD 5000 series all support Directx11 right? And the only reason Physx isn't on Ati cards is because Nvidia bought it and got mad that all the ATi cards ran it better than the Nvidia cards so they blocked ATi.
Alienware M17x R2: 740QM Quad Core Standard SATA 250GB CrossfireX ATI Mobility 5870 1920 X 1200 display --Crysis max setting except no anti-aliasting. 1920 X 1200, avg 30fps --Metro 2033, max setting 1920 X 1200, avg 18 fps high setting 1620 X 1200, avg 28 fps --Just Cause 2 max, avg 40 fps --Call of Duty Black ops, max, 35 fps ?!?!? --Arma 2, high setting 1920 X 1200, avg 22 fps ?!?!?!
@weilwen nope Ati has finaly release 3D support and not only for 6000 series the 5000 ,4000 and 3000 series are also supported + only gtx 275 + support nvidia 3d vison and you need a special kit for this wich cost 250 $ ....why u should buy a 250 $ video card + another 250 $ for 3D when you can buy a decent 5000 ati series card with only 200 $ and you get 3D ( about the monitor ...well...xD)
@000CODE000 First and foremost, 3D is far from finished, even if it has support on both ATI and NVIDIA. Furthermore, 3D is very relative, and is a bit negligible on monitors nowadays, unless you can do it on a full HD tv. I tested it myself with the free Track Mania Nations, and really it isn't that great anyway. By the way, there are very, very less computers that can really turn 3D properly, even if you use Crossfire between 2 HD's 5970's.
@mugen1235 5970 does not crossfire well. When you add an extra gpu the scaling gets worse and two 5970's is 4 gpus. That fourth gpu is only worth about 4 or 5 frames I believe the third slightly more but insignificant
@mugen1237 you see a 5970 is already two crossfired GPUs in a single card which means two of them do not scale well while the 480 is a weaker card but it's only a single gpu so it scales considerably better. Basically if you have 1000 euro/dollars/pounds to blow 2 480's is a better investment than 2 5970s. You can also wait for the 6990 which will probably be better again
@jimjamgumbob Yeah, plus Nvidia has PhysX, Cuda, and 3D right? Also, how much do you think the 6990 will be? I know the 6870's are out but they're nothing compared to the 480's are they?
@mugen1237 If I had to guess...A little more than a 580. They're more powerful but like you said Nvidia has things like Cuda and PhysX which may or may not be useful depending on your needs
@WarBenifit156 it will run great, but i rkn u shud overlock ur cpu to about 3.6/3.6, i have almost the same set up, Just get a cpu cooler for abt 40 bucks and u shud be set
What the hell are Nvidia doing? AMD are penetrating Nvidia so hard it brings tears to my eyes just thinking about it. Ive seen reviews of thier 580GTX, it does run cooler than the 480 (thank god), but AMD do it so much easier. AMD are taking a massive steaming dump all over Nvidia.
Just give 4-6 months for the 6900 series, I expect alot from AMD. Nvidia's released stats of the GTX 580 are only about 15% better than a GTX 480. Considering a 5970 is about 25% better than a 480, that's pretty sad.
Lol, I like how Nvidia fanboys are all like "It's 2 gpu'svs one!" Well guess what, same price range, better temps, better performance, all this for what 100$ more? Go cry elsewhere.
The only primary reason that Radeon came out with that dual gpu 5970 was because its best card prior to that which was the 5870 could not handle the Nvidia Gtx 480. IT was just like when Radeon came out with the dual gpu 4870 card because it was failing against beastly single gpu nvidia cards. Nvidia responded with the GTX 295 which was its BETTER Equivalent. When Nvidia comes out with a new dual gpu It will definitely blow the 5970 out of the sky. JUST look at how well a single gtx 480 does
The only primary reason that Radeon came out with that dual gpu 5970 was because its best card prior to that which was the 5870 could not handle the Nvidia Gtx 480. IT was just like when Radeon came out with the dual gpu 4870 card because it was failing against beastly single gpu nvidia cards. Nvidia responded with the GTX 295 which was its BETTER Equivalent. When Nvidia comes out with a new dual gpu It will definitely blow the 5970 out of the sky. JUST look at how well a single gtx 480 does.
What a weasel you are,comparing dual gpu 5970 vs single 480,well sure atis card is faster but nvidia automatically won this competition cause it's unfair from the very start,Im sure this was mentioned earlier but whats the point of this video then,to humiliate nvidia technology?!
I want this video on my L3100 unit.
ebastianlar718s 1 month ago
All what the "The nVidia Fanboys" say is crap.
Guys what are you talking about?
The 5970 is a dual GPU-Card and is better much better then a 580 GTX and a 6870x2.
Also 480 GTX is to hot and is to loud.
This Card is the basdest Card from the GTX serial.
RedPlanet82 3 months ago
Putsss ATI bateu na Gforce afffff
diegofoxlife 4 months ago
Comment removed
Arnoud1987000 4 months ago
ATI hd 5000 series is fail on tessellation!!! so its fail in DX11 so fuck this 5000 series the 6000 series is good but the 500 series of nvidia is a lot better
Arnoud1987000 4 months ago
Two things i want to see in future Graphics cards... one Better cooling for ATI and that there not upside down i WANA SEE THE PRITTY SIDE lol
ht448 4 months ago
Considering Crysis is made for nVidia cards and it seems to dislike crossfire/SLI... I'd say the 5970 did surprisingly well!
Edge0fPain 5 months ago
Okay, I wanna know why my 5970 black edition flickers while playing crysis and the benchmark..
MindSeeR666 5 months ago
nerdgasim.
Darbaz009 5 months ago
Why are you testing an overclocked Radeon against a standard clocked GeForce?
Nolonar 5 months ago
4 years later..... and graphic cards still can't play this game at 60 fps......!!!!!!
coolflame18 5 months ago
@coolflame18 Becouse of the Trees
ht448 5 months ago
@coolflame18 That's nothing, really.
Even a crappy looking RTS (Real Time Strategy) can kill your CPU & GPU even after 10 years.
All it has to do is to spam particles and units and misc. objects onto your screen.
I've got a lot of respect for Half-Life 2, because it was still good looking even after 4 years, even though it didn't require a killer-PC at launch (unlike Crysis)
Nolonar 5 months ago
@Nolonar thats an interesting comment. Can you give a name a 10 year old game (of any kind). That I can't play at full quality today on even an average pc?
coolflame18 5 months ago
@coolflame18
You may try Age of Mythology's map editor and create lots of Phoenixes on the same spot until your rig starts sweating.
You may also try Rise of Nations' map editor and spam any unit you want (preferably the ones that look like they're more taxing)
You may spend hours until your FPS rate drops below 30, but it is possible.
Alternatively you may play WoW, go somewhere with lots of high-lvl people and their high-lvl equips (although WoW isn't quite 10 yet)
Nolonar 5 months ago
@Nolonar thats a cpu bottleneck. not a gpu test.
XHighWarlordGigglesX 2 months ago
@XHighWarlordGigglesX You may be correct, but I think it depends on the game too.
Sure, your CPU will have trouble managing all those units, but if those units have lots of particles attached to them (like smoke), your GPU might run into troubles as well.
Also, the more units you have, the more taxing shadow casting will be.
The thing is: games nowadays try to skip rendering process (you don't need to render what you don't see), something that older games probably lack.
Nolonar 2 months ago
@XHighWarlordGigglesX But in the end, my point was to say: Just because an "old" game is ressource hungry, it doesn't mean it is any impressive.
For example, I've once written a program that draws a little landscape (with a mountain, trees and water). It looks like crap compared to Crysis, it doesn't have any animated objects nor particles and it barely runs with 50 FPS, even though my PC can run Crysis 1 maxed out in FullHD with no less than 40 FPS.
Nolonar 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@coolflame18
You may try Age of Mythology's map editor and create lots of Phoenixes on the same spot until your rig starts sweating.
You may also try Rise of Nations' map editor and spam any unit you want (preferably the ones that look like they're more taxing)
You may spend hours until your FPS rate drops below 30, but it is possible.
Alternatively you may play WoW, go somewhere with lots of high-lvl people and their high-lvl equips (although WoW isn't quite 10 yet)
Nolonar 5 months ago
no pueden comparar una placa de un solo nucleo con una de doble nucleo, hay que ser pelotudo,.
Por que no la comparan con la Geforce GTX 295? apuesto a que le pasa el trapo como un pedazo de sorete
seba0021Taringa 7 months ago
@seba0021Taringa sorry... none of us speak Burrito.
gooby90 5 months ago
@gooby90 CHUPAME LA PIJA, PELOTUDO
"SUCK MY COCK, FUCKING ASSHOLE"
seba0021Taringa 2 months ago
Comment removed
Allgameszogger429 7 months ago
this game is unoptimized as shit!! why not test another newer game like Bad company 2?
LOLMAN22 9 months ago
@LOLMAN22 Bad Company 2 takes less performance to run, both graphics cards would be capped at 60 FPS with vsync on so there wouldn't be any competition.
finthallon 8 months ago
you are comparing a duel gpu card agenst a single gpu card you sicken me
MrComputereviews 9 months ago
your intro is so cool! With wich programm you make it?
pfisti1981 9 months ago
What happens? in this video GTX480 consume ~620W, but in your video
(GTX 580 vs GTX 480 Crysis Benchmark)
GTX480 consumes already ~470W. Miracles of progress or how?
Zotac91 10 months ago
HD 5970 is DUAL GPU compare it vs 2 GTX 480's then its fair
JeemOfRunescape 10 months ago
@JeemOfRunescape stop crying like a stupid bitch.. single card is single card. GTFO with your excuses.
mrshzzit1 10 months ago
@JeemOfRunescape exactly i find it funny how all the amd fans compare their dual gpus to nvidia single gpu and they get 10fps more and they think its a victory. Now dont get me wrong if amd did make a single gpu card that was powerful enough to be the best single gpu then i would definitely pat them on the back cause thats something theyve never done or at least not done in a loooooong time
decimat777 10 months ago
and why all you vids the HD5970 is best?
GTX 295 taking 30-45 fps and here the GTX 480 taking 30 - 40 -.-
capatais777 10 months ago
@capatais777 : its called " immature Drivers"...
trubritar 10 months ago 10
@trubritar :D
capatais777 10 months ago
@capatais777
GTX295 is also multi GPU while GTX480 is single.
gamewizard 10 months ago
@capatais777 ati radeon cards always running without physicengine like nvidia cards.
you can change nvidia settings so that the physics are off and on so if you would turn it off then it would be a fair battle! ;)
rockmasl123 5 months ago
ati broken fast idiot card
capatais777 10 months ago
And all soo nvidia cards consume more power, people love them just because they got physx.
KEEVVY 11 months ago
I think there was something wrong with this 480 because my 460 gets about 1-2 fps less in this test :\ 1080 res max settings. hmm well anyways i think the 480 (besides this test) does quite well as single gpu as no single gpu card (from ati) can beat it.
decimat777 11 months ago
@decimat777 youe peace of shit 460 is probly doing dx 9 and the 480 doing dx 10 with tessalation. and yes dx10 has tes.
mrshzzit1 10 months ago
@mrshzzit1 no its doing dx10 and actually the gtx 460 is very good bang for buck card, i got my second one a few months ago and its even better.
decimat777 10 months ago
@mrshzzit1 dx10 has instanced tessellation and i have 2 460's which beat that 480 by quite a few frames since i have a mobo with extremely high bandwidth. and its not very respectful to call someone elses hardware shit. I think you need to spell check before you reply as well. My card was doing dx10 at the time. I realized later on that his specs overall were less than mine so that was another benefit to my card because my system only has 3% bottleneck(tests..) where a normal computer has 30-40%
decimat777 9 months ago
LOL!! this is FAKE, The GTX 480 is #2 and HD 5970 is on #14 in the list of high end graphics card benchmark..
By the way GTX 580 is the number one on the list..This video is fail
Mr2pacLegend 11 months ago
dude^^ you can't compare this two graphic cards :P
5970 is a dual-core gpu.... gtx 580 is a single-core
you should make gtx 580 sli vs HD 5970 ;)
lorin1996 11 months ago
@lorin1996 Don't believe him,The GTX 480 is #2 and HD 5970 is on #14 in the list of high end graphics card benchmark..
GTX 580 is the number one on the list
Mr2pacLegend 11 months ago
it's obvious that 5970 gonna win this, crossfire is enabled so they're using 2 radeon cards vs 1 of gtx 480.. no fair
asauman23 11 months ago
what were the game settings?
asillynoob 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This run it Good ya think?
Intel® Core™ i7-860 Processor
- 2.80 GHz
6 GB installed DDR3 RAM
ATI Radeon™ HD 5850 Graphics
- 1GB GDDR5 dedicated memory
MrSookmaRook 1 year ago
Why is crysis still so hard to run!! Considering crysis is almost 5 years old now and a dual gpu card that costs like 800 dollars cannot run it at a constant 60 fps
Gigamonkey2 1 year ago
gtx 480 350€
HD 5970 600€
hm....lol of course i take the 480...600€ for a new card -.- STUPID
waterfisk39 1 year ago
HAHA!! take that nvidia!!
joshodst 1 year ago
I like the ATI because its more performance by lower price.
Therafaelcoleto 1 year ago
@Therafaelcoleto But 5970 is 800bux
dammpe2 1 year ago
@dammpe2 yeah, that's right. :/
Therafaelcoleto 1 year ago
@Therafaelcoleto WRONG! HD 5970 is only 300$ or so now. GTX 480 is basically the same price, who wins? HD 5970 of course, way better performance and still #1.
Zemadclover 11 months ago
@dammpe2 and full of shitty driver problems. I use to own one and im glad I moved to 2 580s because not only can I run benchmarks, I can play games!
HardwareHank02 1 year ago
My benchmark is 39FPS on everything max except detail, which is set on high.
FourSidedPiston 1 year ago
3D will be satisfying in about 3 years. Just like xFire/sli was shit when it first came out, now xfire's more efficient + powerful with the 6000 series.
FourSidedPiston 1 year ago
cpunge001 1 year ago
@cpunge001 Yes. Probably more if that's all included.
AsianPerson3 1 year ago
ATI IS ALWAYS THE BEST WHEN IT COME TO GAMIING THUMBS UP!!!
CHECH THIS OUT>>>> msi GX640 MAXED SETTINGS 70FPS:)
pogi2st 1 year ago 14
@pogi2st haha never go have a card taking 70 fps on crysis maxed limit
capatais777 10 months ago
Nvidia for life on every single GPU card from Nvidia comes 1 dual GPu card from AMD :D AMD sucks!!!!
Schadenmaster 1 year ago
Well, its true that the 5970 is the fastest graphic card in the planet right now, but its has 2 GPUs (bi-GPU) , so ....
The GTX 580 has only 1 GPU, its mono-GPU, and there is no single mono-GPU ATI card can beat her, so Nvidia WINs ...
houari2009 1 year ago
@houari2009 Don't you think if they can put another Gpu they have already did that?? When they figurate how to put then yes Nvidea will crush Ati... but intil then Ati is better... I don't understand why this fight with defenders of Nvidea and Ati, does not metter, what metter is in wich card is better in this time, will always comes better sometime Ati other Nvidea.
Egonkiller 1 year ago
cpu 4.4 ghz? thats great!
hikmaet 1 year ago
Ati Radeon HD 5970 actually, the fastest graphic card in the world: 4 GB DDR5, supports 6 displays (HDMI) until , proccesor speed 4.8 teraflops..... F***** Goooooooooood! Nvidia sucks!
odracir1986 1 year ago
Why don't u try comparing the GTX 480Sc vs ATI Radeon 4GB HD5970 OC from sapphire.
moeschizlac 1 year ago
Ati RULZ!!!
Noxx1984 1 year ago
This is stupid, gtx 480 is a single gpu card, 5970 is a dual gpu card.
OCE4500 1 year ago
@OCE4500
You're right, and this really isn't fair,
But look at the temps
the dual GPU 5970 is still running cooler than the 480- wtf?
ZeronoreZ 1 year ago
@OCE4500
Well, ATI has most powerful graphics card anyway. Deal with it
Miqimus 1 year ago
Comment removed
nerbne 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
trubritar was using a dual-gpu card compare to a single-gpu card..
don't say that you were using 1 card compare to 1 card~haha..what a ridiculous excuse~2 gpu are inside hd5970.Ati faster~i agreed but
nvidia card will have more powerful of Tessellation,pure realistic and perfect in gaming quality
physX one of the technology prepare for realistic 3d gaming
let's take hd5970/6950 or 6970 in 4way cross compare to evga nvidia gtx580 FTW hydro copper2 in 4way sli
Son of BITCH!Crank Your SH#! Up
nikoeng4 1 year ago
@nikoeng4 lol then why did gtx 480 cost nearly same price as 5970? and clearly 5970 is about 30% faster then 480 in gaming, mabye not in tenssilation. i can still remember gtx 480 cost about £460 pounds and 5970 about £480-500. and from looking at price point of view gtx 480 was a fail compared to 5970. anyhow hardly any games currently uses tensilation, except metro 2033 name me any game which uses it. bet you wont have many in ur head lol if you dont use cuda cores then ati always the no1.
helloshayan 1 year ago
@helloshayan
i agreed that gtx480 set at the bad price ,heat and slow than 5970
and that's why fail compare~idiot also will know that gtx480,470 fail product
but now days
The most important factor, beyond framerates, is the visual quality and experience returned by the product. The GeForce GTX 580 allows a more immersive, smoother, and consistent quality of gameplay
a evga nvidia gtx580 FTW hydro copper2 will knock the pants off anything out there
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
NVIDIA should stop working on "exclusive features" (like physX) and work more on their GPU
aStupidTroll 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
If nvidia releases a fermi graphics card including two cores, it'll definently beat a 5970 in any modern dx 11 game if my facts are right.
george3dmax 1 year ago
@george3dmax yes but it will cost twice as much:P
you do know 5970 is only $20 more then gtx 580.
helloshayan 1 year ago
@george3dmax yes but it will cost twice as much,
you do know hd 5970 only cost $20 more then gtx 480 :P and gives about 30% more perfomance.
helloshayan 1 year ago
Comment removed
nikoeng4 1 year ago
watch?v=1SH61p1r50Y
LuGiank 1 year ago
Ati= better performance, lower price. Nvidia = lower performance, higher price, better technology. I personally, i would buy the latest Nvidia cards, even though, the Ati is way cheaper.But we all know the Nvidia cards got better technology(cuda, physx, etc).just my opinion....dont try to eat my head guys!Cheers.
endre1989 1 year ago
outstanding review bro with custom music good job buddyz ...............
kalimantans 1 year ago
does anyone know if the ATI HD 5970 is still the best graphic card out there? i got one now, really consider buying one more and add the i7 980x to it
SiIXEN037 1 year ago
@SiIXEN037 im pretty sure the 6990 will beat it
mannbearpig21 1 year ago
@SiIXEN037 yes it is still the fastest card out there...this is a list of all graphic cards if u want to chek it for yourself pc-erfahrung.de/grafikkarte/vga-grafikrangliste.html
anuz5 1 year ago
I saw the 5970 In action it's the best graphic card I have ever seen used in front of my eye's no lag super fast turns with incredable smoothness.
I will buy one when the price comes down.
Dorisequador 1 year ago
@Dorisequador Price is down.
Zemadclover 11 months ago
@Zemadclover Ya and now dicontinued wow man I was so upset I want the XFX version with the GPU's far apart for less heat issues.
Dorisequador 11 months ago
still the hd 5970 is the if the best
when hd 6970 come's out still the hd 5970 then it in some part's
kensuu1995 1 year ago
i dont think ati is great,my ati hd mobil. 5470 runs 3dmark 06 at first graphic test only at 6 ~8 FPS but NVidia 8600 GT have 20~25 FPS at the graphic test. (I,m not Nvidia fanboy)
SkulLzSouL 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 you ate realy asking this ?
8luisfs8 1 year ago
my card got spanked :(
Xazpiration 1 year ago
even though 5970 won, i still like nvidea fermi cause it has directx 11 and physx...till ati gets something better, then i will still love fermi (the ati multiple screen doesn't matter to me)
NvideaMan808 1 year ago
@NvideaMan808 Umm.. Dude you do know the HD 5000 series all support Directx11 right? And the only reason Physx isn't on Ati cards is because Nvidia bought it and got mad that all the ATi cards ran it better than the Nvidia cards so they blocked ATi.
Zemadclover 11 months ago
@Zemadclover ya i already knew that it ati had Dx11
NvideaMan808 11 months ago
dual gpu hd 5970 has min. fps: 18
single gpu gtx 460 1gb has min. fps: 22
with the same settings
Cyberqpunk 1 year ago
nvidia just got owned
rooopppi 1 year ago
5970 is huge
diegofg10 1 year ago
I need a card for my FSX witch one it's better??? I got i7 920 3.8, 12GB RAM
juanga251 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi bro, how do you think Crysis will run on my pc with this specs:
CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition (overclock 4.2Ghz)
CPU Cooler: Thermaltake Frio CLP0564
Memory: Kingston HyperX Blu 2 x 2GB DDR3 1600MHz
Graphic Card: Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6870 1GB DDR5
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64bit
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 1TB - 7200RPM, SATA 3.0Gb/s, 32MB Cache
Please Reply =P
iviru 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 gay hd 6850 kills the gtx 460
skimowhite586 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 sounds great but go with ati next time
AngelFlames1 1 year ago
How abot my spece?? How do you think Crysis will run on my pc? Here's the
specs.
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz 2.80 GTz
Memory: 2GBX3 Kingston HyperX ddr3 1600mhz
GPU: Asus Nvidia 260GTX 896MB GDDR3
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit English
Hard Drive: WD Caviar Black 1TB 64MB
Please Reply!!!
alan5ive5133 1 year ago
@alan5ive5133 everybody with these questions should check out reviews of their graphics card and see how it performs in games...
DeltaX999 1 year ago
@alan5ive5133 you should definitely buy more Ram...
lorin1996 1 year ago
i want them both...crossfired in SLI :D
FREEMANkjuk 1 year ago
do they give the same graphics?
mclock5 1 year ago
why nvidia cards eat so much energy? its because of cuda, PhysX and those things?
Mario0Dante 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 you can have grenades going off all at once and it will run fine
MegatonKick 1 year ago
IYellowDudeI 1 year ago
From my knowledge gtx 480 supports 3D while 5970 doesn't. Am I right?
weilwen 1 year ago 12
@weilwen And? nVidia = selfish shit...
kohy1990 1 year ago
@weilwen nope Ati has finaly release 3D support and not only for 6000 series the 5000 ,4000 and 3000 series are also supported + only gtx 275 + support nvidia 3d vison and you need a special kit for this wich cost 250 $ ....why u should buy a 250 $ video card + another 250 $ for 3D when you can buy a decent 5000 ati series card with only 200 $ and you get 3D ( about the monitor ...well...xD)
TheGrandTheftshit 1 year ago 31
@TheGrandTheftshit lol who says u cant do normal 3d on nvidia ? lol first infororm ur self it has liek 10 modes all difrent 3D red-blue example
000CODE000 1 year ago
@000CODE000 First and foremost, 3D is far from finished, even if it has support on both ATI and NVIDIA. Furthermore, 3D is very relative, and is a bit negligible on monitors nowadays, unless you can do it on a full HD tv. I tested it myself with the free Track Mania Nations, and really it isn't that great anyway. By the way, there are very, very less computers that can really turn 3D properly, even if you use Crossfire between 2 HD's 5970's.
JorisCeoen 1 year ago
@TheGrandTheftshit fuck, i wanna try watching porn in HD and 3D
worldofurin 1 year ago
@weilwen no
tarikat966 1 year ago
@weilwen who the fuck cares about 3d, personally i dont fucking care, im not a nerd and sheesh, who needs 3d with a big ass monitor?
Nikk500 1 year ago
@Nikk500 kool story bro
weilwen 1 year ago
@weilwen yeah dont try to say that i am not right
Nikk500 1 year ago
@weilwen 3d sucks
Nikk500 8 months ago
@weilwen no radeon HD 4000+ supports 3D
soildsnakefoxhound 1 year ago
@weilwen
Yep. What's your point?
I think ATi cards are branching into 3D soon too.
1337RussianCoDPlay3r 1 year ago
@weilwen who fuck does game with 3d anywhay? ive buyed Nvidia 3d vision about 1 week ago! im so fucking disapointed.
cpunge001 1 year ago
@weilwen Who gives a shit about 3D, it just hurts your eyes and gives you headaches -.-
PhantomGamer100 11 months ago
should i get the Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition or wait fir the i7 990x?
TheProjectrgx 1 year ago
@TheProjectrgx i7-980x
thunderkiss641 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 VERY VERY smoothley , I have same videocard and processor :D
OrRkaz 1 year ago
GTX 480 SLI or 5970 XFIRE?
mugen1235 1 year ago
@mugen1235 5970 does not crossfire well. When you add an extra gpu the scaling gets worse and two 5970's is 4 gpus. That fourth gpu is only worth about 4 or 5 frames I believe the third slightly more but insignificant
jimjamgumbob 1 year ago
@jimjamgumbob So not even 480 SLI is worth it?
mugen1237 1 year ago
@mugen1237 you see a 5970 is already two crossfired GPUs in a single card which means two of them do not scale well while the 480 is a weaker card but it's only a single gpu so it scales considerably better. Basically if you have 1000 euro/dollars/pounds to blow 2 480's is a better investment than 2 5970s. You can also wait for the 6990 which will probably be better again
jimjamgumbob 1 year ago
@jimjamgumbob Yeah, plus Nvidia has PhysX, Cuda, and 3D right? Also, how much do you think the 6990 will be? I know the 6870's are out but they're nothing compared to the 480's are they?
mugen1237 1 year ago
@mugen1237 If I had to guess...A little more than a 580. They're more powerful but like you said Nvidia has things like Cuda and PhysX which may or may not be useful depending on your needs
jimjamgumbob 1 year ago
@mugen1235 wait for the amd 6990 it faster then the 5970 in crossfirex
TheProjectrgx 1 year ago
@TheProjectrgx It's probably going to be $1,000 I bet. Just like the Asus Ares.
mugen1237 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 yeh man just buy tyhte game give it a try. cost wat like £5
versionintegrale 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 it will run great, but i rkn u shud overlock ur cpu to about 3.6/3.6, i have almost the same set up, Just get a cpu cooler for abt 40 bucks and u shud be set
bungmuffin 1 year ago
Comment removed
eltiernit0 1 year ago
@eltiernit0 nah, no 1 cares about ur crying. just give it up... 2 year old hd 5970 still owns all. dont cry.
mrshzzit1 1 year ago
How would this handle Crysis?:
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition
Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H, Socket-AM3
Kingston ValueR. DDR3 1333MHz 8GB, CL9
WD Caviar® Blue™ 1TB 3,5", SATA 3 Gb/s
Western Digital Caviar SE16 500GB SATA2
EVGA GeForce GTX 470 1280MB PhysX CUDA
Windows Ultimate 7
mymichellegunsnroses 1 year ago
@mymichellegunsnroses pretty good
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
I'm not a fanboy but i think i will always prefer ATI.
Japsenliebhaber 1 year ago
They came out with the 9970 already?
randomuseronthenet 1 year ago
What the hell are Nvidia doing? AMD are penetrating Nvidia so hard it brings tears to my eyes just thinking about it. Ive seen reviews of thier 580GTX, it does run cooler than the 480 (thank god), but AMD do it so much easier. AMD are taking a massive steaming dump all over Nvidia.
TheGusto69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i heard that if chuck norris touch any pc...the pc run any game at 1000fps..
thats what i heard..
TheProjectrgx 1 year ago
Just give 4-6 months for the 6900 series, I expect alot from AMD. Nvidia's released stats of the GTX 580 are only about 15% better than a GTX 480. Considering a 5970 is about 25% better than a 480, that's pretty sad.
rsman169 1 year ago
Lol, I like how Nvidia fanboys are all like "It's 2 gpu'svs one!" Well guess what, same price range, better temps, better performance, all this for what 100$ more? Go cry elsewhere.
rsman169 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only primary reason that Radeon came out with that dual gpu 5970 was because its best card prior to that which was the 5870 could not handle the Nvidia Gtx 480. IT was just like when Radeon came out with the dual gpu 4870 card because it was failing against beastly single gpu nvidia cards. Nvidia responded with the GTX 295 which was its BETTER Equivalent. When Nvidia comes out with a new dual gpu It will definitely blow the 5970 out of the sky. JUST look at how well a single gtx 480 does
eltiernit0 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only primary reason that Radeon came out with that dual gpu 5970 was because its best card prior to that which was the 5870 could not handle the Nvidia Gtx 480. IT was just like when Radeon came out with the dual gpu 4870 card because it was failing against beastly single gpu nvidia cards. Nvidia responded with the GTX 295 which was its BETTER Equivalent. When Nvidia comes out with a new dual gpu It will definitely blow the 5970 out of the sky. JUST look at how well a single gtx 480 does.
eltiernit0 1 year ago
Radeon is better
Blazik02 1 year ago
25 Nvidia fans got mad
Voikanaa 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 in high settings not very high
naughtynishant 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 yes it will run on your PC
PCKoter 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 depends on your display resolution and game settings.
Aslapacrosstheface 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheProjectrgx 1 year ago
@WarBenifit156 : It will run crysis extremely well
trubritar 1 year ago
What a weasel you are,comparing dual gpu 5970 vs single 480,well sure atis card is faster but nvidia automatically won this competition cause it's unfair from the very start,Im sure this was mentioned earlier but whats the point of this video then,to humiliate nvidia technology?!
H00dedFigure 1 year ago
@H00dedFigure watch his other video: 5870 vs 480GTX
the 5870 still wipes out the NVIDIA-card
GEGMastachief121 1 year ago