@Terryisfriendly - There is no question this transformative work falls under the fair use doctrine of US copyright law (section 107) which deals with exceptions for commentary, criticism and parody.
@rebelliouspixels - "E-Trade. You can't take it back." I notice that network television cut that line. I'm curious if the networks got permission from you to broadcast your work or if you think permission was even necessary?
Well at least his life savings can't have been that much
Muffinman071 1 week ago
Awesome!! ***** Haha I can see why E-Trade filed a bogus copyright claim. God forbid, the baby tells it like it really is!
coSMia2010 2 weeks ago
hahaha
riotguy92 3 weeks ago
Funniest fuckin' thing I've ever seen!
gjf6748 3 months ago in playlist Etrade babies
Who cares It's funny
steercat32 6 months ago
@steercat32 i agree
MrJzieger 5 months ago
Comment removed
CarbonSource 6 months ago
This would definetly fall under the fair use in a paradoy exception to copyrighted works.
bapef 6 months ago
Very cute, but the original copyright holder might disagree with you!
See copyright.gov/fls/fl102.
Terryisfriendly 6 months ago
@Terryisfriendly - There is no question this transformative work falls under the fair use doctrine of US copyright law (section 107) which deals with exceptions for commentary, criticism and parody.
rebelliouspixels 6 months ago
@rebelliouspixels - "E-Trade. You can't take it back." I notice that network television cut that line. I'm curious if the networks got permission from you to broadcast your work or if you think permission was even necessary?
Terryisfriendly 6 months ago