Added: 1 year ago
From: autocar
Views: 47,441
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The fastest car Jaguar have ever made ? i think not its the XJ220 it was the fastest car in world for a few years ????????? 220Mph ???????????

  • which car will score 5 stars

  • 90 seconds of beatuty

  • the only basis it has to cover for them is that its british

  • that V8 sound gives me a instant boner

  • @ariell92

    you too?? I thought I had a medical issue!!

  • This guy is heartrending... He wanna be funny and cool - but he isn't . TopGear is brand motorshow - and this is for fans of VW :D

  • Why do they compare an XK Jag to a 911? Sometimes they compare an M3 to a 911. The slowest 911 will do 275-280 km/h, the M3 only does 250 limited, maybe a bit more unlimited. A 911 is a sport car, an M3 is sport coupe based on a sedan and the XK is GT or grand tourer. Compare apples to apples please. Also the 911 is designed for the driver so more money is spent on its chassis, steering, balance. The Jaguar spends more money on refinement, noise reduction, equipment.

  • this car looks sooooooooooooo beautiful **

  • @ipodgrey2 just like your Mun

  • @BaNgAs13 stfu

  • These people never ever give 5 stars to any car. He just railed on about how perfect the car is, and how hard it is to find fault in it, and how it covers all the bases and yet still no 5 stars.

  • @MachXX2 Agreed, they're very hard on the ratings. I was looking at one of these today. Thought I'd look at some reviews. 4.5 is the highest I've ever seen them rate a car.

  • @MachXX2 they will probably not give any car 5 stars because there isn't a brilliant/perfect car in every area. If a cheap McLaren F1 was made with 50mpg then that would probably get 5 stars.

  • @MachXX2 They gave 5 stars to an XFR

  • BEAUTIFUL JAGUAR

    SOUNDS GREAT+10

  • beautiful car+10

  • the stripes are ugly and the colour shouldn't have been gray. A sports car need yellow, red, blue or something like that.

  • here's some issues you might wanna consider:

    1) it's too freakin' heavy

    2) it's too freakin' slow 0-60, 1/4 mile and top speed

    3) it's hard to fix and expensive to fix

    4) not too overpriced but still overpriced a bit... this isn't the biggest complaint :)

    yeah, I like jag but 3 out of 5 stars is all i'd go with

  • @rtardbox It's lighter than all it's competitors including a DB9, Mazzer and 250kg lighter than a Merc SL Bi-Turbo.

    Any object this sort of money will be expensive to fix, whether it's a watch, car or furniture. It's all relative.

    The worlds motoring press, even an high-ranking Audi engineer admit it's the worlds best GT.

    Bloody bargin this machine

  • @rtardbox

    here's some factor you might wanna consider:

    1) it's way lighter than M6 & SL 63(400~600lb)

    2) It's faster than M6 & SL63 according to Car & Driver Mag(the only magazine did a real 0-60 test, not using the factory data)

    3) it's has 5 years 5000 miles warrantee with free maintenance

    4) cheaper than SL63 & M6(with the same options)

    Most of all, Jag just got 5 starts rating, top 3 on reliability on March 2011 by JD Power

  • @rtingdds Well bloody said, especially with the fat talentless Merc

  • Whoa!!!! The downright copied the sims from the 2011 Volvo S60!!!!!! Go on the Volvo website and they're the optional rims for the T6. EXACTLY the same rims!!!!

  • I want more than just 90 seconds...

  • If you died right now are you 100% sure you'd go to Heaven?

  • If you died right now are you 100% sure you'd go to Heaven?

  • They are still expensive even at a few years old (decent spec) ... well to me anyway it's alot!

  • I don't want to hear another Brit tell me that I incorrectly pronounce coupe as "coop" when it is supposed to be "coop-ay." You all pronounce Porsche as "Porsh." It's "Porsh-ah!"

  • Does any one agree if the front looks ugly? Please dont hate me 

  • @MaloEdu

    I think you are the odd ball here...

  • @rtingdds the front looks like a fish mouth. Anyway i love the car, i wish i have one :))

  • @MaloEdu

    now that you mentioned it, it did look like a cat fish. Man, you have to ruin it!!

  • I have an 07 XKR with 420bhp and I never find myself saying "I wish I had more power" but I wish I could afford one of these!

  • @tonyhilliarduk

    You must be rich?

  • @SuperLC1010

    Nope .. 2 years old for less than the price of a new Audi.

  • @tonyhilliarduk

    Really, what Audi though?

  • @SuperLC1010

    decent spec A5.

  • totaly crap from tata

  • the best bit of that car is, that it is in basic an aston martin, since aston uses almost everything from jaguar, except the bodywork and the interior. so you get a much cheaper, very similar looking and performing car.

  • That center console should looke a bit more MODERN!!!!

  • JAGAUR RULE!!! GOOD

  • the jaguar get so high rating because it is British , autocar is famous for not being fair

  • @Prostreetcrazy

    the Smoking Tires also give it top rating, they are Americans.

  • God, it sounds good!

  • There's one of these on my street.. has a huge '75' in a circle on the side too.. looks ugly.

  • this over the dbs? i think so

  • like the idiot who said the sls is faster than the slr this is another idiot, do your fucken research, i rather have the shittier xj220 WHICH IS FASTER, it will fully fuck this car sideways.

    the old xj220 smashes a pagani zonda, so your saying jaguar fastest car can beat not only the xj220 but the pagani zonda LMAO buddy, thank god TOP GEAR IS BACK!

  • let this crappy 90 sec verdict go !!

  • XJ220 is there fastest production car Jag even made

  • Amaizing car, but the interior materials look cheap

  • ill take it

  • He's so biased.

  • @MercSLRFan

    Every British douche-bag with a car program is biased. Just look at Clarkson...

  • @carmgn56 Hows he being biased?

  • In before jealous people say "Jaguar is not British, its Indian"...

    Jaguar XK Chief Designer - Ian Callum (Ian, classic Indian name)

    Jaguar Chief engineer - Mike Cross (his real name is Mihirkiran Chandra)

    Jaguar XKR built in Birmingham, England (only joking, its built in Bihar, India)

  • 0-60 4,4; top speed 174 and it costs 85k pounds.. what the fuck?!?! except look and sound - there is nothing good about this jag.

  • Fuck these 90 second reviews. There so lame. How about a regular review autocar?

  • Front looks like a GTR , rear like Audi A5 .

    Looks good!

  • so how much is it?

  • wow... how many stars did the 911 GT3 get?

  • I dont care how the stripes look on this car....i love the SOUND :)

  • Production cars are what is actually built otherwise it's a concept car no matter how many are built even a car like the XJ220 it is a production car because they made it...

  • Is that top speed limited? 523bhp should top 200mph, not 174mph.

  • Autocar - please look at the comments on the 90 seconds review! Its okay if you're going to release a full review as well, but you aren't! WE WANT THE FULL PACKAGE !

  • so why not 5 stars you twat, didnt mention any flaws...?

  • Not the fastest car jaguar has ever made...

  • this car appears to me very underwhelming...

  • 0:26 looks awfully scary

    i would have pooped myself if i was driving

  • only problem is a gt3 could run circles around the jag....silly comparison imho

  • The 90sec car reviews have to be the biggest load of crap I've ever seen. They never gives the cars the full justice it deserves

  • Why the hell is he comparing a Grand Tourer to a GT3?! The car weighs almost 1.8 tons for fuck's sake! Some times I really wonder what those guys from Autocar are smoking, 'cause it seems to be some really heavy shit.

  • @methaman1 was wondering the same shit? 911 turbo would be a better comparison.  But hey, im no automotive journalist

  • @methaman1 the whole idea of this car i believe is its a stripped out version of the xkr so more sporty with alot more performance but as he says its not actaully stripped out. the gt3 is a stripped out version of the regular carrera s aimed for harder drivers like this one. and the 911 turbo is way way to expensive to compare.

    this car in my opinion is perfect.. its weighs alot but it would grip like fuck and with 530hp i dont think it would be slow

  • The fastest car that Jaguar makes now, is what he was saying ;)

  • UM, KJ220!!

  • love these reviews, cant wait for top gear to do this one!

  • Who compares that to a gt3! theyre no were near the same sort of car!

  • I think the XKR is very pale. I liked its predecessor a lot more.

  • Comment removed

  • This deserves alot more than 90 seconds

  • If there's no fault with it why doesn't it get 5 stars? Motoring journalists are never happy I guess.

  • @Energonorama nothing is perfect so, this is nearly there no?

  • @Rik1pk Lot's of things are perfect, it's all relative.

    If they love the car in every aspect and don't have a bad point to say about it then they must give it 5 stars, otherwise the whole review is pointless.

  • @Energonorama but perfection don't get exist :S

    all the thing must jave a ballance in life, none is perfect

  • reviewing a jag while wearing shorts: priceless :D

  • I could do without those stripes down the side, other than that, beautiful car!

  • This car deserves more than 90 seconds!

  • Looks and sounds bloody awesome!

  • Jaguars fastest ever production car?? Hmmm, what about the XJ220? :\

  • @nickcook85 certainly tata's fastest car, love the xk series...but good point because like the xj220, this car is also a limited edition

  • @nickcook85 To be fair it's not far off....

  • @nickcook85

    I think 500 units have to be built to be considered a production car. Not sure how many XJ220's were built. maybe 300?

  • @nickcook85 lmao nice one i never thought of that

  • @nickcook85 XJ220 was a Jaguar Special vehicle and was a build to order so not strictly a production car. :o)

  • @nickcook85 just what I thought..

  • @nickcook85 i was JUST thinking that...

  • @nickcook85 XJ220 wasn't a full production car.

  • @nickcook85 The XJ220 was limited in production numbers(200+ something was it?) , while this one is non-limited, continous production, they'll sell it until interest in the car fades out.

    Cheers!

  • @nickcook85

    this guy knows nothing ,, just look at his face and you will get the story!!

  • @nickcook85 it wasnt production car only 220 made

  • @nickcook85 u do have a point but maybe they're talkin bout current Jaguars

  • @nickcook85 The XJ220 cannot be thought as a normal production car, but any XK is though.

  • @nickcook85

    I think he means production as in like "currently building" or maybe he forgot about the XJ220.

  • @nickcook85 XJ220 was a limited run car so not a production car as such!

  • @nickcook85

    I think he said that because the XJ220 was a limited production sport car....

  • @Pacione620 Isn't the xkr 75 also limited to 75 cars?

  • @chocolademan5ET

    Yes it is, but in my opinion the XKR is consider the fastest production one because it comes from a normal production model with many other versions...but it's a personal idea.. ;-)

  • @chocolademan5ET

    Not really... It seems those numbers are for each region or country. For example in the U.S. it's called the XKR 175 because it will be limited to 175 U.S. models, while in Europe it's the XKR 75 because 75 will be sold there. At the same time Japan will get the XKR 75 because 75 will be sold there as well. So yes it'll be limited, but not near as much as Jaguar would like you to believe.

  • @alfistii1

    I simply stated my opinion on two videos which you obviously don't agree with, then you come around TROLLING with one finger stuck on cap lock and the other stuck up your butt. Anyway you're the one that got banned, so who got the last laugh? haha 

  • @jamesjr934 Lol!!!!! What a resonse to alfistii1!!!! ;)

  • Comment removed

  • @nickcook85 i was just thinking the same thing, but i don't know if that was real "production" car as it may have just been a low volume specialty machine

  • @nickcook85 But the Xj220 was not legal for the streets.

  • @vika01 the xj220 was a road car,i think initialy it was supposed to have some huge engine but cost cutting had it reduced to a twin turbo v6.

  • @nickcook85 that was limited production I believe.

  • Who put the stripes on that car? they look horrible!

  • not quite sure if its a gt3 match in terms of track speed it weighs half a ton more but i love this jag and that v8 sound is just amazing

  • 50L surcharged v8 needs the buyer to own a gas station

  • looks good. Like how he drove it hard during the video

  • It looks absolutely stunning. I doubt it's a match for Porsche on the track, but how many buyers actually go on track days anyway? You won't notice the difference in day-to-day use.

    I love it. I'd have it over the Porsche any day. And this is the first time I've ever said that.

  • very nice

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more