the fact is, if he did find life out of the jar he would have been like ******* im suing this company, what kind of food company allows life to generate from peanut butter jars?!?!!?
the fact is, if he did find life out of the jar he would have been like ******* god just generated another life!!! it's proof god exists!!!!!!!! your arguments are now invalid!!!
If the Discovery Institute gets it's way this is how smart a school children will be also. With or without life, that jar of peanut butter is far more intelligent than he is.
If the Discovery Institute gets it's way this is how smart a school children will be also. With or without life, that jar of peanut butter is far more intelligent than he is.
I guess the church that produced this video dont realize that the beginning of life didn't consist of vast amounts of preserved, air tight peanut butter. also didn't realize that it takes millions of years longer than the expiration date for the creation of life.
WOW. Let me just tell everybody that I am a theist for sure, Christian for sure, and I am not even certain I wouldn't claim creationism over evolution (though I certainly don't think its a stupid idea). And it is really a shame to think I share this with this guy. How stupid can somebody get? And just so u all know this is on a video tht is fairly widely known. What moron, what kind of mentally incapacitated moron, put this deranged imbecile on their video?
The fact is, if something had jumped out of that peanut butter jar, a creature never seen before, he would not have said "omg, God does not exist after all!"
He would have simply said.. "See? God just created a new, never seen before creature, put it in this jar only to prove his own existence. Now, was I right, or was i right?"
I saw another video with a fragment of the same fancy lady in the courtroom. Does anyone know which is the original video? I'd like to see that show xD
WATCH OUT THOSE EVIL SATANIST COMMUNIST ATHEISTS WORSHIP ADOLF DAWKINS AND ARE USING PEANUT-BUTTER-GENESIS TO BREED THEIR SUPERIOR RACE WHO WILL SIDE WITH THE MEXICANS AND STEAL ALL OUR JOBS THEN VOTE OBAMA YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED ALL CAPS AND NO PUNCTUATION MEANS IM RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
I like how they try to disprove evolution by saying that abiogenisis is not possible. Two completely different things. First of all one is a theory and the other is a hypothesis. So... suck it dumb ass creationists!
Why peanut butter, specifically? According to them, evolution says that life starts randomly, so why not look at every surface imaginable? They do not demonstrate how evolution would ever predict spontaneous new life in a peanut butter jar. New life would have a very tough time getting started at this point anyway, since the first strain of it has pretty much claimed the entire Earth, crowding out chances for a separate evolutionary path to suddenly take hold. What nonsense.
Its not like random matter was exposed to heat or lighting to suddenly create life. It took a long time for proteins to form into replicating amino acids and eventually into self replicating RNA. Scientists have created self replicating synthetic DNA. You lose.
that actualy made sense, wow evolution is definatly wrong, whoever thinks that there are really fossils out the like tetrapods and homo erectus and all that other stuff is really dumb
Listen Chuck, this isn't hard - Abiogenesis has nothing, I repeat NOTHING to do with evolutionary theory. It simply amazes me how often creationists mindlessly lump together completely seperate theories (big bang, abiogenesis, evolutionary theory, etc...) and label it all as "evolution" or "darwinism".
If you had a sea of peanut butter that covered almost the entire early earth, and might it the right chemical composition, and exposed it to lots of pressure/heat for several million up to a billion years, there's a fair chance that life would evolve.
1 star for completely not understanding abiogenesis, and -10 stars for calling abiogenesis "evolution." Evolution says NOTHING about the origin of life, that's abiogenesis.
@BrasNDrawers Hey is not a scientist, he is a rich businessman and bible teacher that got a masters degree in engineering (not a science) decades ago. They are misleading you by saying he is an engineer given that he does not or has not practiced the field of engineering since college. WIKIPEDIA!
Yes, because evolution(a scientific fact[that's basically what a theory is in science]) is a fairytale, but you Santa in the Sky is very real. BTW: If stuck in a jar the contents of early earth, and give it a spark and about a billion years, I bet you would find life.
Mat 7:6 "Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you." Sometimes, as sad as it is, it is better to let people think they have it all figured out.
Hmmm, do I give 1 star for the epic creationist stupidity illustrated in this video, or 5 stars for the darwin faced kangaroo.... its too hard to choose....
"The current screwing up of the world is over different groups of people with different versions of god."
And if we didn't have God or gods then the "screwing up of the world" would simply be because of different versions of shirts or top 40 hits. Humans are best at conflict.
Belief in an all-knowing, all-powerful supreme cosmic dictator who created the universe is not only very childish and illogical, it's simply ridiculous and highly embarrassing for any serious adult to admit.
The clear cognitive dissonance displayed by followers of organised religion is currently the world's most pressing mental health challenge.
For those ready to seek help, the book The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins may be a good place to start.
This video is deliberately deceptive and you can tell by their flow of (non)logic and words that they are strongly trying to idea the idea of abiogenesis (creation of life from nonliving matter) to the theory of evolution. Evolution has NOTHING to do with abiogenesis, and even though abiogenesis has hardly any evidence to back up how it might have happened, evolution is based upon MILLIONS and MILLIONS of rigorously scrutinized facts and contradicted by absolutely NO facts at all.
@VillainousOperative A more correct, yet stil flawed, equation for life would be "certain matter containing amino acids and various other chemicals + energy + time = life.
@VillainousOperative So what if people confuse evolution, with biogenesis ... that's not something bad ... just means that some of us still have the brain of an Australopithecus! :)
You proved the point of the original video. If matter plus energy does not equal life, then, from an evolutionary view, there really is no way that we can exist. You must recall what evolution is built upon: abiogenesis and the big bang. Supposedly, the universe began as a condensed point in space, with all matter zero-dimensional. That means no acids, no proteins, and no DNA sequences; nothing. So, why wouldn't life come from peanut butter if it came from nothing?
@7DragonTech7 Because immediately after the big bang, lots of energy condensed into quarks and gluons. These formed into protons and neutrons, which formed into hydrogen and helium atoms. These were attracted together by gravity, and formed stars. Inside the stars, nuclear fusion took place, producing all the different elements found in nature. When the stars ran out of useful fuel, they burnt out and spread the new elements all throughout space.
@VillainousOperative These new elements began reacting together, creating a huge range of molecules, including nucleic acids. Scientists currently believe the first self-replicating molecules took the form of RNA. From there, they evolved by natural selection and became bacteria, and then eventually those evolves into every living thing you see around you today. Meanwhile, a jar of peanut butter, though containing a range of organic molecules, cannot spontaneously form...
@VillainousOperative ..into life, because it does not have any of these self-replicating proteins to build on. Also, matter add 'energy' does not form life because the energy used in the example is just light. Hitting matter with this would simply heat the matter up. Abiogenesis does not say that life was created in a flash by matter being hit with energy, it merely says that the components life came from came into existence naturally, as explained above, without God's help.
The question still remains: how did any matter at all, not to mention order of said matter, originate from nothing? And by nothing, I mean /nothing/; nothing at all; zip; nada; zero; zilch; nix; rien; nil; null; aught; cipher; niente.
@7DragonTech7 It wasn't nothing. It was a singularity, an infinitely compressed point of spacetime. It had no physical or temporal dimensions at that time, true, but it still contained energy.
Where the original singularity came from, we still aren't sure. We could live in a cyclic universe maybe, or it could be repeated inflation or any number of things, the scientists are still trying to figure it out.
But at least that's better than giving up and saying God did it.
How can nothing contain energy? If it wasn't physical, then what contained and utilized the energy? And a singularity is unchanging; if it is zero-dimensional, there is no time, thus no change. It doesn't make sense.
If the universe was started by some other natural process, what started the process that started our universe? And what about the process that started that? It all has to lead back to something before everything; and that something must /be/ everything.
@7DragonTech7 Well, the singularity is not *strictly* zero-dimensional... look, it's really complicated. Go read the Wikipedia article on it or something.
But yes, that's a good question. What did cause the Big Bang? What was 'before' our universe? Maybe someday, through scientific enquiry, we'll find out.
Either way, evolution by natural selection definitely happens and abiogenesis is possible without the intervention of a God. These are things we HAVE found out! ;)
@7DragonTech7 And you can be certain, without a shadow of a doubt, that it was actually THE creator, the actual creator of the actual universe, that wrote to you?
@tomzjamz This is true. If peanut butter had been around for billions of years, it would most likely have developed sentience by now, or at least gone a bit off.
Actually, that doesn't make sense. Because, the theory of evolutionists says that life began being struck by lightning or some other source of energy all by itself and it just started. So, you saying it takes billions and billions years to ignite life is like saying that the more time we have, something is gonna happen. However, they already tried to strike goo with lightning, and nothing happened. 50s was it? Now, if I take a watch and take it a part. How long before it becomes a watch again?
Not true. Any evolutionist will tell you that a pri-mordial soup was the beginning of all life on earth. Read your science books. It's in there. Thanks for sharing.
"like saying that the more time we have, something is gonna happen"
So you don't agree that there's a limit how fast some things can happen? Have you ever seen a child grow to adulthood in 5 milliseconds? Of course not, but one shouldn't conclude there's no such thing as an adult.
"Now, if I take a watch and take it a part. How long before it becomes a watch again? "
That's one of the worst analogies going.
Failure to realize the difference between clockwork and biological molecules demonstrates a total lack of understanding of physics, chemistry, biology and watch design.
Do cogs have attractive forces between them "trying" to pull them into stable configurations?
Is there a sea with a trillion cogs in it continually stirred around?
I guess you have it all figured out. I'll leave you alone then. I can't make you believe in God. You have to come to Him yourself. It is only by faith. As for your science, I have two degrees. I heard all the stuff throughout college. I've seen a professor tremble under the light of my questioning and apologize to me the next day. But, like you, they simply didn't believe in God. They had no faith. It is sad when a man doubts God Almighty. All along, that same man's time on earth grows short.
It's not just "my" science. It's the science which gave the world antibiotics, computers, tv, phones, doubled life expectancy, tamed the biggest killers of previous centuries, put men on the moon, reduced infant mortality by a factor of five, created ways to make clean drinking water etc.
Religion has it's uses, such as controlling people's behavior, but predicting, explaining and manipulating physical reality are not among them.
I doubt anything which doesn't have physical evidence, or disagrees with irrefutable observations of the physical world, because all real things do have physical evidence.
There is a reason why religious indoctrination only works on children and the feeble minded.
That's because I am capable of rational thought. Maybe you should focus your efforts on the young and impressionable.
You'll have more luck there because they are vulnerable to arguments which manipulate the emotions but offer no proof.
If your arguments were as unassailable and perspicacious as you pretend, you wouldn't need the histrionics at all. You could present your evidence and appeal to reason.
I'd prefer it if you answered one of the points which utterly demolishes your argument, but since you can't do that I suppose you'd better just give up and protect your willful ignorance.
Yeah so much for this peanut butter thoery, all i have to do is look out my window and see grass , trees birds in the air, all manner of life which all came from evolution. Another can say i see all this too but it came from creation. Only there is more evidence to support evolution and what is standing in the way , a small mind and a jar of peanut butter hahahahaha. Makes a peanut butter sandwich, later that will evolve into shit when i take a dump
Saying to look into other religious texts? I have done this to a small degree. It seems to me that no other ancient religious text is as accurate historically or literally than the Bible. In fact, much of the Koran (Q'uran) is no where near aged as the Bible. 622 AD Forced To Flee Mecca -The town elders of Mecca initially opposed the teachings of Mohammed. They forced him to flee to Medina. His flight became known as the Hegira. Ask any Muslim. Now, Biblical archaeology dates to what? Hmmm.
Since when is there lightning and random chemicals and other shit that can make life packed in a peanut butter jar? It would taste reaaaally bad and look gross if it had everything needed to create life in every jar... I know I'd never eat that shit. Honestly, I'm 15. I can tell you this is bullshit. Yet some ADULTS think it's true. I feel so unsafe knowing these adults are controlling my freedoms and rights as of now.... ._.
What a Fucking dumb bastard. I feel sorry that he never read a high school biology book....or an elementary school biology book. You aren't even talking about evolution, your talking about creating peanut butter babies. Try jerking off in the peanut butter you douche bag!!!
There is no scientific evidence that dead inert matter can combine with generic energy and produce complex genetic information codes and structures. Evolutionists cannot explain this and so make the huge leap of faith of assuming it somehow did without any intelligent guidance.
Intelligent, conscious, complex information systems require intelligent creation, the belief they can happen by chance is fantasy. This is a much greater leap of faith for the atheist than the believer.
Yes, it is evidence, GoldenLight. At some point, evolution must prove itself. Only a dork would believe in evolutionary theory. There is no evidence for life being created from dead matter. None. Synthetic bacteria created in a lab? That's not proof. There's absolutely not proof for evolution. Aliens either did or God did it. That's up to the logician.
That's the point evolution HAS proven itself over and over again. From micro evolution (like resistance of bacteria, to breeding different types of dogs,or bananas :D) to macro evolution ( the almost fully separation between donkey's and horses) etc...
But I'm probably talking to the scripture 'cuz the brain ain't listening.
religioninsanity, evolution has never been proven, and your example of "a difference between donkeys and horses" is called adaptation. Not evolution! This is found in many species. I can't believe you're 37 (my age) and actually believe what you're saying. I'm awestruck! Evolution is a total lie, and I can prove it on several levels. However, evolutionists will continue to deny truth even when faced with solid evidence. Also, my brain works fine. I doubt you have my level of education. Good day!
Okay so your alternative is god...? Which one then? Because there are many gods throughout history and cultures. What proof do you have that god would have created life?
religioninsanity, donkeys and horses share similar genetic material, but they differ by two chromosomes. They are separate species. Just like there are humans and apes. We did not evolve for one another, and neither did the horse and donkey. In fact they are so similar that they can mate together to create offspring - the mule. But mules are almost always sterile, and cant produce offspring themselves. A genetic defect obviously for the mule. Donkeys and horses do not prove evolution.
religioninsanity. It's quite logical. Let me show you from a scientific perspective, okay? Not going to argue with you. I know you don't want to believe in God. Proof evolution does not exist: DNA genetic code with decoders to read the code and use the code. There is no junk DNA. This is a total lie. Computer programs do the same thing, and did anyone write this computer program? You're darn right they did. You can't sit there and honestly believe this intricate, complex code is done by chance.
religioninsanity, let me give you an example here. I have every letter in the alphabet and all the numbers of the universe. I take them all and throw them up in the air - wait billions and billions of years without any intelligent mind effecting these letters and numbers - and suddenly I get a complex DNA code with decoders, readers and writers? No matter how long you leave that garbage sitting there, someone has to put it together. Aliens or God? You pick. But, evolution? A total lie.
It seems quite hard for you to get the question? I don't ask you to disprove evolution. I'm just asking you to give one bit of evidence that God has created life in all it's diversity.
Evidence for God? Well, it's obvious that faith in the God comes by faith alone. It's with a humble heart and sincere mind that we come to God. We get caught up in the things of this world which are temporary, and we pass by many who's lives have been restored by Christ alone. Atheists have so many chances to see the love of Christ. It passes by them and walks towards them, but they walk away to seek the things of this world. Truly, a man must be Born Again, for without this renewal, he is dead.
So like I said in the beginning. It starts raining scripture from the moment you have to prove something. You know what? Other religions claim exactly the same. Why would you be right? There are far more people believing in something different. Or is it only north America that falls under the grace of god.
No, that's not true, religioninsanity. Other religions do have a Jesus. :) Muhammad did not die for the sins of the world. Krishna neither. Buddha either. Jah either. Horus either. Ra either. No one but Jesus died for the sins of the world. We are all sinners, and we all fall short the Glory of God. Under the law, we are dead in sin. Only through Christ alone is a man found worthy. Only through Lord Jesus Christ who nailed your sins and mine to a the cross though we rightly deserve death.
Scripture again!!! But okay.. Now try to do the following. Try to disconnect for just a single moment from this bible thing. And read what you just have written. Jesus died for our sins ... we are all sinners. So god didn't do a good job on forgiving, didn't he? Even newborns are born in sin. It sound Jesus died a most horrible sadistic way in vain, and God let it all happen?? In my current understanding of the law, this is a serious case of neglect.
religioninsanity, ever lied? Ever stolen something? Ever committed a sexual act out of wedlock? Ever sinned? Just as criminals rightly deserve punishment by the laws of this world, so does the sinner deserve punishment. However, God gave us a get of jail free card. Jesus. He carried our sins on the cross and suffered the punishment for our sins. He died, descended into hell and preached to the Old Testament saints for three days and on the third day He arose. He did this, so we may be with Him.
So, you see? God is fair. God sacrificed His only son that we may have eternal life with the Lord. He gave us mercy, and by Christ's wounds we are healed. Christ carried our sins on the cross, so that we would not have to suffer the punishment for our own sins. However, if a person rejects Christ's free offering of grace (the get out of jail free card) his sins are upon his own head. 1 John Chapter 2 calls a man who reject Christ an anti-christ, for He denies Christ as the Son of God and Savior.
There is no other god than the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The Bible's histories are true. Its words will never pass away. Greater men than you and I have sought to destroy it, but have failed. There is no work of literature in the history of the earth that transcends the Bible. There are no words that match; no stories that parallel or equate with the stories of the Bible. There is no life like Jesus. What He has done could fill the planet in books. He loves us, and He died for our sins.
the bible is true, ok so i guess the earth is still flat and the sun and stars revolve around the earth. Wrong, I guess the earth is only 4000 years old too based of that bishop who used the bible to date how old the earth is, again wrong
No other book that transcends the bible? Maybe you should look at the Zohar or the Koran which are both religious text. I bet i was just put on earth as a test of your faith.
If God were to come down into full view of men, for one they would not survive. Two, if God forced us to believe in Him by flashy tricks and powerful signs, where would faith reside? "Jesus said to him, "Is it because you have seen me that you have believed? How blessed are those who have never seen me and yet have believed!" John 20:29. Many will never believe, because they were proud and put their faith in the science of men instead of God's Word. Not everyone will accept Christ.
Okay this argument really proves, you don't understand ANYTHING about evolution. first, DNA wasn't the start of life it came later into the picture. second matter can form itself into complex structures. Have you ever seen a snowflake? How many chances are there that if you have a cloud of random water vapor it can assemble to ice crystals, or is god assembling those all the time? Third, you are talking about abiogenesis now in case you didn't know.
religioninsa, snowflakes are not human life. This proves nothing. That's Physical Science. Amorphous solids? Solids? Liquids? Gases? Anyone who has taken Physical Science in high school knows that this is not evidence for evolution. Ice crystals are not life. There are no transitional fossils. People have offered loads of money for transitional fossils, and they never appear. If you have transitional fossils, I suggest you deliver them to this guy in Turkey. Heard 10 million Turkish lira.
there are transitional fossils, i have seen them in the natural history museum in London, Reptiles that have feathers and wings with claws on them , plus not all of them are fossils, There are living creatures out there that aint dead that are transitions between the same species, For example a bat is a rodent and a walrus is desended from an elephant
The transitional fossils you believe are transitional are not truly transitional. Don't you think that more of these would be dug up over time if they existed? I am just curious as to your reasoning. There would have to be a transitional fossil linking everything, and surely they would be found in a the billions, millions or however many did exist tying everything together. It just makes no sense. Evolution is a total lie and deception. At least, please say aliens.
Zoe, you don't know it's true. Put it this way. Evolutionists believe in books written by men and inspired by men. Christians believe in one book written by God, inspired by God and written down by men. Now, evolutionists put their faith in theories, which are not entirely provable. Christians put their faith in God, who isn't entirely provable either. However, I would rather put my faith in a Holy God than a man any day. Look how much men have already screwed up the world.
Also, Zoe? Carbon dating and many other theories of men (scientists?) are merely based on assumptions, theories and gray areas. In truth, no one knows if the world has been here for 10,000 years or 10 billion years. They only make assumptions and use scientific theories to formulate their conclusions. We don't even know if gravity exists. We only call it gravity, because Newton did. We make educated guesses. However, these days, it's about dark matter. Nothing is for sure. God is.
Zoe, there are no transitional fossils. Please wakeup. A man offer an awful amount of money to any scientist who could bring a real transitional fossil before him. You know what happened? No one showed. They don't exist. If you have a bunch in your closet, you should turn them over to your local library immediately. I'm sure they can put them on display for all the kids.
You are wrong about the Bible saying the earth is flat. I heard one of my professors in college say that same thing. Isaiah 40:22. Read it. Long before Columbus, Isaiah said the "circle of the earth." Now, some will say it's not a sphere, because he says circle. Well, that's not true either. Circle in Hebrew is "chewg" meaning spherical (circle of expanse) or dancing in a procession much like the planets do. Look it up! The Bible is true. Don't just believe something without study and reading.
As for you saying the earth is only 4,000 years old, that's not true either by Biblical insight. In fact, the Bible even says that a day to God can be a thousand years. Scripture: 2 Peter 3:8. Now, this means that God's time scale is not necessarily our time scale. In fact, Jesus is often referred to as the Ancient of Days.
Did you also know that 5,000,000 year old Lucy the corpse was a total lie? Even the guy who found it admitted this. Even the transitional stages from apes to humans is flawed. It's been found riddled with holes. There's no missing link. It's all lies. You need to read this book: The Case for the Creator by Lee Strobel. Look up about Lucy, the transitional stages of ape to man and other lies with which they've riddled our textbooks in high schools nationwide. Some scientists have admitted this.
Tiktaalik, Archeopteryx, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus Africanis, Homo Erectus, Homo Habilus, Homo Neanderthalis, Microraptor, Marsupials and Monotremes, Nautilus, and several thousand other animals, both living and extinct, mark clear transitions in evolution. Lucy was not a fake, it is still on display in the natural history museum, besides that one fossil is just a tiny fraction of hominids that show the transition of ape to man.
As well all know, carbon atoms consist primarily of Jiff Brand peanut butter flavored quarks. Bah, you use the logic of a 2 year old, please, suits do not automatically make you seem smarter, but logic and basic reasoning skills do. learn things before you try and teach them.
dumass, thats why there an experation date. because "LIFE" will form. the peanut butter itself doesnt turn into life. it just produces it. look at the ingreedients. water, protein, ect...building blocks for life.
I was so sure she was going to say "But despite that obvious truth the evolutionists continue building an arsenal of 'facts' and 'logical view points' to combat our Heavenly Father".
Wow i never knew early Earth was a jar of peanut butter. F2ggot Christians life was created with lighting not a fucking jar of peanut butter without the gasses of the early Earth. Idiots they already created life in Cornell University few years ago with the atmosphere of early Earth. They compare peanut butter with lightning. Im pretty sure 100,000,000,000,000 jars of peanut butter would not create enough energy compared to 1 strike of lightning.
what friggin joke. So then I guess that since i put my keys into my igniton in my car my car starts, but when i put my finger into the ignition it doesn't start, therefor only god can start car. That makes just about as munch sense as this bullshit!
wtf? this makes no sense whatsoever!!! First of all, HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THERE IS NO NEW CELLULAR LIFE INSIDE??? YOU HAVE TO DO MORE THAN LOOK AT IT WITH YOUR EYES!!! WHAT ABOUT THINGS LIKE PRESERVATIVES!!! This video also does not acknowledge that MOST OF EVOLUTION IS NOT ABOUT HOW THINGS WERE CREATED, BUT HOW THEY EVOLVED!!! these people are retards
Peanut butter is the atheist's nightmare now? Ray Comfort said it was the banana.....their logic sucks but I'm getting a craving for a peanut butter and banana sandwhich at the very least...
im considering abandoning my agnosticism and becoming an atheist evolutionist. evolution is false because theres no life in PEANUT BUTTER??? Thats what they came up with??? did they even consider preservatives and all the crap that gets put in peanut butter to STOP bacteria growing in it???
To strengthen its scientific credentials, the Vatican is organising a conference next year to mark the 200th anniversary of the birth of the author of the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin.
should I like or dislike this
darkilustrisimus 4 months ago
0:42 - 0:44: "If we examine a jar of Peanut Butter, it contains matter."
The sad thing is this isn't even the stupidest statement in this video...
I brand them Masters of the Obvious.
Talic3 8 months ago
the fact is, if he did find life out of the jar he would have been like ******* im suing this company, what kind of food company allows life to generate from peanut butter jars?!?!!?
the fact is, if he did find life out of the jar he would have been like ******* god just generated another life!!! it's proof god exists!!!!!!!! your arguments are now invalid!!!
MrBigEnchilada 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If the Discovery Institute gets it's way this is how smart a school children will be also. With or without life, that jar of peanut butter is far more intelligent than he is.
dfoosdc 9 months ago
If the Discovery Institute gets it's way this is how smart a school children will be also. With or without life, that jar of peanut butter is far more intelligent than he is.
dfoosdc 9 months ago
thanks for the edits, they kind of ruined it
ketite 10 months ago
LOL, the primordial ooze must have been peanut butter, it all makes sense now.
fogdelune 10 months ago 2
@fogdelune Holy Shit, I just observed my Peanut Butter under the microscope performing Meiosis!! It all makes sense now!
Talic3 8 months ago
This guy is an engineer???????? HAH AH AHA HAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH!
SCPF 10 months ago
I guess the church that produced this video dont realize that the beginning of life didn't consist of vast amounts of preserved, air tight peanut butter. also didn't realize that it takes millions of years longer than the expiration date for the creation of life.
imalwaysdrunk 11 months ago
WOW. Let me just tell everybody that I am a theist for sure, Christian for sure, and I am not even certain I wouldn't claim creationism over evolution (though I certainly don't think its a stupid idea). And it is really a shame to think I share this with this guy. How stupid can somebody get? And just so u all know this is on a video tht is fairly widely known. What moron, what kind of mentally incapacitated moron, put this deranged imbecile on their video?
evlemprorjoe 1 year ago
Do these theist types not realize how fucking stupid they sound or are they just trying to get more money from the REALLY stupid believers?
AtheistApe5 1 year ago
Um, evolution does not purport to explain the ORIGINS of life - only how it developed afterwards.
QuakerJT 1 year ago
The fact is, if something had jumped out of that peanut butter jar, a creature never seen before, he would not have said "omg, God does not exist after all!"
He would have simply said.. "See? God just created a new, never seen before creature, put it in this jar only to prove his own existence. Now, was I right, or was i right?"
cbbatista 1 year ago
WHAT level does penut butter evolve???
baahhhFATALITY11 1 year ago
@baahhhFATALITY11 You'd have to ask someone at Bob's Padlocks, they'll know the answer.
silencesoloud12 1 year ago
I saw another video with a fragment of the same fancy lady in the courtroom. Does anyone know which is the original video? I'd like to see that show xD
Shynoh 1 year ago
MY FUCKING PEANUT BUTTER EVOLVED!!!!
baahhhFATALITY11 1 year ago
@baahhhFATALITY11 .
Congratulations, Peanut Butter just evolved into Chocolate paste!
:D
Shynoh 1 year ago
@Shynoh NO! My peanut butter evolved into NUTELLA!!! :D
baahhhFATALITY11 1 year ago
@baahhhFATALITY11
Nutella IS chocolate paste :p But it's the best kind, no doubt :D
Shynoh 1 year ago
@Shynoh Oh...I didnt know that Nutella was chocolate paste, its fucking delicious! :D
baahhhFATALITY11 1 year ago
@baahhhFATALITY11 It's chocolate and hazelnuts. YUMMY!
DuffleMuffins 11 months ago
Again they fail. This time confusing origin of life with evolution.
304Stephen 1 year ago
WATCH OUT THOSE EVIL SATANIST COMMUNIST ATHEISTS WORSHIP ADOLF DAWKINS AND ARE USING PEANUT-BUTTER-GENESIS TO BREED THEIR SUPERIOR RACE WHO WILL SIDE WITH THE MEXICANS AND STEAL ALL OUR JOBS THEN VOTE OBAMA YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED ALL CAPS AND NO PUNCTUATION MEANS IM RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
GrandSupremeDaddyo 1 year ago
I like how they try to disprove evolution by saying that abiogenisis is not possible. Two completely different things. First of all one is a theory and the other is a hypothesis. So... suck it dumb ass creationists!
Ye4hBuddy 1 year ago
Why peanut butter, specifically? According to them, evolution says that life starts randomly, so why not look at every surface imaginable? They do not demonstrate how evolution would ever predict spontaneous new life in a peanut butter jar. New life would have a very tough time getting started at this point anyway, since the first strain of it has pretty much claimed the entire Earth, crowding out chances for a separate evolutionary path to suddenly take hold. What nonsense.
Jesus = FAIL
empbac 1 year ago
THERE IS BACTERIA, EVERYWHERE!
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
Its not like random matter was exposed to heat or lighting to suddenly create life. It took a long time for proteins to form into replicating amino acids and eventually into self replicating RNA. Scientists have created self replicating synthetic DNA. You lose.
Cenamark2 1 year ago
that actualy made sense, wow evolution is definatly wrong, whoever thinks that there are really fossils out the like tetrapods and homo erectus and all that other stuff is really dumb
144mtl441 1 year ago
1:35 I'd hit that. But first, I'd knock some sense into that idiot's head. XP
CalicoVall 1 year ago
haha every fith grader could outwit those idiots.
DaveTheSpy 1 year ago
hahaha this is sooo retarded
robin1506 1 year ago
get down get down,..get down get down
puffadderbite 1 year ago
These videos don't bother me... what bothers are the people who believe it. It would be laughable if not for that fact.
Roper122 1 year ago
Listen Chuck, this isn't hard - Abiogenesis has nothing, I repeat NOTHING to do with evolutionary theory. It simply amazes me how often creationists mindlessly lump together completely seperate theories (big bang, abiogenesis, evolutionary theory, etc...) and label it all as "evolution" or "darwinism".
OsteologicalsRock 1 year ago
Did that really just happen?? Seriously?? How could anyone with even half a brain think that that is true?
Just shows the shoddy standard of biology taught in most of america
merp141 1 year ago
If you had a sea of peanut butter that covered almost the entire early earth, and might it the right chemical composition, and exposed it to lots of pressure/heat for several million up to a billion years, there's a fair chance that life would evolve.
1 star for completely not understanding abiogenesis, and -10 stars for calling abiogenesis "evolution." Evolution says NOTHING about the origin of life, that's abiogenesis.
chadachada123 1 year ago
What the fuck did I just watch? A scientist try and disprove evolution by using a jar of peanut butter? Why was he ever awarded a degree?
BrasNDrawers 1 year ago 4
@BrasNDrawers Hey is not a scientist, he is a rich businessman and bible teacher that got a masters degree in engineering (not a science) decades ago. They are misleading you by saying he is an engineer given that he does not or has not practiced the field of engineering since college. WIKIPEDIA!
LordEnder88 1 year ago
@BrasNDrawers probably wasnt
144mtl441 1 year ago
Yes, because evolution(a scientific fact[that's basically what a theory is in science]) is a fairytale, but you Santa in the Sky is very real. BTW: If stuck in a jar the contents of early earth, and give it a spark and about a billion years, I bet you would find life.
imanerd36 1 year ago
Mat 7:6 "Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you." Sometimes, as sad as it is, it is better to let people think they have it all figured out.
smiley47223 2 years ago
Typical scientifically-illiterate creationist bimbos. Fucking morons, all of them.
rddaos 2 years ago 23
Hmmm, do I give 1 star for the epic creationist stupidity illustrated in this video, or 5 stars for the darwin faced kangaroo.... its too hard to choose....
saxosaregay 2 years ago
God is Peanut Butter?! o_0"
FinalFanatic1984 2 years ago
"The current screwing up of the world is over different groups of people with different versions of god."
And if we didn't have God or gods then the "screwing up of the world" would simply be because of different versions of shirts or top 40 hits. Humans are best at conflict.
admiralbob02 2 years ago
I think the best thing for creationism would be that they stop using food as examples....
admiralbob02 2 years ago 2
I think it's funny how creationists actually attack their own theory while attacking Evolution.
TheFortressMaximus 2 years ago 3
eh... i didnt know that evolutution had something to do with the origin of life
Darusdei 2 years ago
So EPIC FAIL ! ! Evolution has nothing to do with how life spawned in the first place, but how it EVOLVED!
SternMann93 2 years ago
Peanut butter doesn't have enough water for new life to live on. FAIL
Beastphilosophy 2 years ago
What makes it fail is that evolution has nothing to do with where life comes from.
deRoyLight 2 years ago 3
Belief in an all-knowing, all-powerful supreme cosmic dictator who created the universe is not only very childish and illogical, it's simply ridiculous and highly embarrassing for any serious adult to admit.
The clear cognitive dissonance displayed by followers of organised religion is currently the world's most pressing mental health challenge.
For those ready to seek help, the book The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins may be a good place to start.
HumanistWikitopian 2 years ago
This video is deliberately deceptive and you can tell by their flow of (non)logic and words that they are strongly trying to idea the idea of abiogenesis (creation of life from nonliving matter) to the theory of evolution. Evolution has NOTHING to do with abiogenesis, and even though abiogenesis has hardly any evidence to back up how it might have happened, evolution is based upon MILLIONS and MILLIONS of rigorously scrutinized facts and contradicted by absolutely NO facts at all.
EcrossH 2 years ago 2
Thank you! You can tell they know nothing about evolution, or even elementary biology, by the fact that they're using peanut butter as an example.
Hmm. Peanut butter.
Does it contain amino acids?
Does it have complex protein strands just floating about?
Is it full of lovely adenosine triphosphate?
No?
Then DNA based (i.e. all known forms of) life cannot possibly suddenly start existing for no reason.
And no. Evolution does not teach that "Matter + Energy = Life". Thats just dumb.
VillainousOperative 2 years ago 26
@VillainousOperative A more correct, yet stil flawed, equation for life would be "certain matter containing amino acids and various other chemicals + energy + time = life.
silencesoloud12 1 year ago
@VillainousOperative So what if people confuse evolution, with biogenesis ... that's not something bad ... just means that some of us still have the brain of an Australopithecus! :)
SCPF 10 months ago 3
Sorry abiogenesis*
SCPF 10 months ago
@VillainousOperative Well you can't expect them to actually argue against facts, they have to set up a strawman first
icantfindanamex86 10 months ago
@VillainousOperative
You proved the point of the original video. If matter plus energy does not equal life, then, from an evolutionary view, there really is no way that we can exist. You must recall what evolution is built upon: abiogenesis and the big bang. Supposedly, the universe began as a condensed point in space, with all matter zero-dimensional. That means no acids, no proteins, and no DNA sequences; nothing. So, why wouldn't life come from peanut butter if it came from nothing?
7DragonTech7 1 week ago
@7DragonTech7 Because immediately after the big bang, lots of energy condensed into quarks and gluons. These formed into protons and neutrons, which formed into hydrogen and helium atoms. These were attracted together by gravity, and formed stars. Inside the stars, nuclear fusion took place, producing all the different elements found in nature. When the stars ran out of useful fuel, they burnt out and spread the new elements all throughout space.
VillainousOperative 1 week ago
@VillainousOperative These new elements began reacting together, creating a huge range of molecules, including nucleic acids. Scientists currently believe the first self-replicating molecules took the form of RNA. From there, they evolved by natural selection and became bacteria, and then eventually those evolves into every living thing you see around you today. Meanwhile, a jar of peanut butter, though containing a range of organic molecules, cannot spontaneously form...
VillainousOperative 1 week ago
@VillainousOperative ..into life, because it does not have any of these self-replicating proteins to build on. Also, matter add 'energy' does not form life because the energy used in the example is just light. Hitting matter with this would simply heat the matter up. Abiogenesis does not say that life was created in a flash by matter being hit with energy, it merely says that the components life came from came into existence naturally, as explained above, without God's help.
VillainousOperative 1 week ago
@VillainousOperative
The question still remains: how did any matter at all, not to mention order of said matter, originate from nothing? And by nothing, I mean /nothing/; nothing at all; zip; nada; zero; zilch; nix; rien; nil; null; aught; cipher; niente.
7DragonTech7 1 week ago
@7DragonTech7 It wasn't nothing. It was a singularity, an infinitely compressed point of spacetime. It had no physical or temporal dimensions at that time, true, but it still contained energy.
Where the original singularity came from, we still aren't sure. We could live in a cyclic universe maybe, or it could be repeated inflation or any number of things, the scientists are still trying to figure it out.
But at least that's better than giving up and saying God did it.
VillainousOperative 1 week ago
@VillainousOperative
How can nothing contain energy? If it wasn't physical, then what contained and utilized the energy? And a singularity is unchanging; if it is zero-dimensional, there is no time, thus no change. It doesn't make sense.
If the universe was started by some other natural process, what started the process that started our universe? And what about the process that started that? It all has to lead back to something before everything; and that something must /be/ everything.
7DragonTech7 1 week ago
@7DragonTech7 Well, the singularity is not *strictly* zero-dimensional... look, it's really complicated. Go read the Wikipedia article on it or something.
But yes, that's a good question. What did cause the Big Bang? What was 'before' our universe? Maybe someday, through scientific enquiry, we'll find out.
Either way, evolution by natural selection definitely happens and abiogenesis is possible without the intervention of a God. These are things we HAVE found out! ;)
VillainousOperative 2 days ago
@VillainousOperative
"Foolishness in God is wiser than human knowledge."
7DragonTech7 1 day ago
@7DragonTech7 Says who?
VillainousOperative 1 day ago
@VillainousOperative
Says the creator of the universe.
7DragonTech7 1 day ago
@7DragonTech7 And did this creator speak to you in person?
VillainousOperative 8 hours ago
@VillainousOperative
No. He wrote it to me.
7DragonTech7 8 hours ago
@7DragonTech7 And you can be certain, without a shadow of a doubt, that it was actually THE creator, the actual creator of the actual universe, that wrote to you?
Did you... see them write it?
VillainousOperative 7 hours ago
@VillainousOperative Also, if I may, I would like to add peanut butter has not been around for billions of years, so has not had that time to evolve.
tomzjamz 2 days ago
@tomzjamz This is true. If peanut butter had been around for billions of years, it would most likely have developed sentience by now, or at least gone a bit off.
VillainousOperative 2 days ago
It's a mistake to assume that I'm arguing against god. That's not it at all.
I'm arguing against taking the creation stories in the bible literally when they don't match the observed evidence.
Most christians don't do this, only a minority of them reject science because they are afraid it casts doubt on theism.
It does not, because science can't prove or disprove god.
Science only gives theories about the physical world, and it's only those theories where it contradicts the bible.
m3141592 2 years ago 3
Actually one time I opened up a can of tuna and Jesus came out. I guess that is proof that both evolution and creationism are true.
stinky472 2 years ago
"if I open a jar of peanut butter I should occasionally find new life inside"
The jar of peanut butter you're using doesn't weigh 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 tonnes, and it isn't 4,500,000,000 years old.
It doesn't contain lightening, weather systems, oceans, volcanoes, meteorites, hundreds of elements in millions of compounds.
So that's not a very good comparison, is it?
Tool.
m3141592 3 years ago
Actually, that doesn't make sense. Because, the theory of evolutionists says that life began being struck by lightning or some other source of energy all by itself and it just started. So, you saying it takes billions and billions years to ignite life is like saying that the more time we have, something is gonna happen. However, they already tried to strike goo with lightning, and nothing happened. 50s was it? Now, if I take a watch and take it a part. How long before it becomes a watch again?
blicksflicks 2 years ago
"Because, the theory of evolutionists says that life began"
No it doesn't. The theory of evolution deals with what happened after life began, not how it began.
Why do you think you can disprove something when you don't even know what it is?
m3141592 2 years ago
Not true. Any evolutionist will tell you that a pri-mordial soup was the beginning of all life on earth. Read your science books. It's in there. Thanks for sharing.
blicksflicks 2 years ago
"Any evolutionist will tell you that a pri-mordial soup was the beginning of all life on earth."
Firstly, there's no such thing as an evolutionist. They're called evolutionary biologists.
Secondly, it's abiogenesis (biochemistry) which deals with that, not evolution.
You speak out of ignorance.
m3141592 2 years ago
"like saying that the more time we have, something is gonna happen"
So you don't agree that there's a limit how fast some things can happen? Have you ever seen a child grow to adulthood in 5 milliseconds? Of course not, but one shouldn't conclude there's no such thing as an adult.
m3141592 2 years ago
"However, they already tried to strike goo with lightning, and nothing happened. "
"nothing" is not what happened.
Molecules were produced with physical properties which allow them to self-organize into increasingly complex configurations.
A hundred-fold increase in complexity in a pint or so of liquid in a short time is quite significant.
How much more complex could it get if it had a trillion times more liquid and a million million times longer?
You don't know (or care).
m3141592 2 years ago
"Now, if I take a watch and take it a part. How long before it becomes a watch again? "
That's one of the worst analogies going.
Failure to realize the difference between clockwork and biological molecules demonstrates a total lack of understanding of physics, chemistry, biology and watch design.
Do cogs have attractive forces between them "trying" to pull them into stable configurations?
Is there a sea with a trillion cogs in it continually stirred around?
m3141592 2 years ago
"Now, if I take a watch and take it a part. How long before it becomes a watch again? "
Imagine a watch where all the pieces have magnetic joints which only fit and stick in the "right" place. (like bio-molecules)
Imagine a system which constantly tries every piece with every other piece until they stick. (like the sea)
Imagine this happening a trillion times per minute, every minute for a billion years.
You'd end up with plenty of watches.
m3141592 2 years ago
I guess you have it all figured out. I'll leave you alone then. I can't make you believe in God. You have to come to Him yourself. It is only by faith. As for your science, I have two degrees. I heard all the stuff throughout college. I've seen a professor tremble under the light of my questioning and apologize to me the next day. But, like you, they simply didn't believe in God. They had no faith. It is sad when a man doubts God Almighty. All along, that same man's time on earth grows short.
blicksflicks 2 years ago
"As for your science, I have two degrees."
It's not just "my" science. It's the science which gave the world antibiotics, computers, tv, phones, doubled life expectancy, tamed the biggest killers of previous centuries, put men on the moon, reduced infant mortality by a factor of five, created ways to make clean drinking water etc.
Religion has it's uses, such as controlling people's behavior, but predicting, explaining and manipulating physical reality are not among them.
m3141592 2 years ago
"As for your science, I have two degrees."
Two degrees? Really? What are they in and where did you study?
m3141592 2 years ago
"I've seen a professor tremble under the light of my questioning"
You must have been asking more insightful questions than you have here then.
Or they were trembling with the effort of not laughing in your face.
m3141592 2 years ago
"It is sad when a man doubts God Almighty."
Why is it?
I doubt anything which doesn't have physical evidence, or disagrees with irrefutable observations of the physical world, because all real things do have physical evidence.
There is a reason why religious indoctrination only works on children and the feeble minded.
m3141592 2 years ago
"I can't make you believe in God."
That's because I am capable of rational thought. Maybe you should focus your efforts on the young and impressionable.
You'll have more luck there because they are vulnerable to arguments which manipulate the emotions but offer no proof.
If your arguments were as unassailable and perspicacious as you pretend, you wouldn't need the histrionics at all. You could present your evidence and appeal to reason.
m3141592 2 years ago 2
"I'll leave you alone then."
I'd prefer it if you answered one of the points which utterly demolishes your argument, but since you can't do that I suppose you'd better just give up and protect your willful ignorance.
m3141592 2 years ago
You have two degrees:
- English literature
- Bachelor of Science in Education
WOW!!!! So in other words you are NOT qualified to comment on evolution.
The only way a professor would tremble under your questioning is due to your bad breath.
You make it sound like not believing in God is a bad thing - at least it demonstrates a mind uncluttered by superstition.
zzytrewq 2 years ago 4
Evolutions do not say how life began. You have read too many creationist lies.
The study of abiogenesis is the about how life came into being.
You don't know the difference between evolution and abiogenesis and you wonder why you across as such a gormless twat.
ZoeMarks 2 years ago 4
Yeah so much for this peanut butter thoery, all i have to do is look out my window and see grass , trees birds in the air, all manner of life which all came from evolution. Another can say i see all this too but it came from creation. Only there is more evidence to support evolution and what is standing in the way , a small mind and a jar of peanut butter hahahahaha. Makes a peanut butter sandwich, later that will evolve into shit when i take a dump
TinkToll 3 years ago
Saying to look into other religious texts? I have done this to a small degree. It seems to me that no other ancient religious text is as accurate historically or literally than the Bible. In fact, much of the Koran (Q'uran) is no where near aged as the Bible. 622 AD Forced To Flee Mecca -The town elders of Mecca initially opposed the teachings of Mohammed. They forced him to flee to Medina. His flight became known as the Hegira. Ask any Muslim. Now, Biblical archaeology dates to what? Hmmm.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
Since when is there lightning and random chemicals and other shit that can make life packed in a peanut butter jar? It would taste reaaaally bad and look gross if it had everything needed to create life in every jar... I know I'd never eat that shit. Honestly, I'm 15. I can tell you this is bullshit. Yet some ADULTS think it's true. I feel so unsafe knowing these adults are controlling my freedoms and rights as of now.... ._.
dragonofthedarknight 3 years ago
LOL. Get down.
Wow. There's quite a few of these.
Check mine out: watch?v=dNw6zO6OvqY
TheStrangeRanger 3 years ago
What a Fucking dumb bastard. I feel sorry that he never read a high school biology book....or an elementary school biology book. You aren't even talking about evolution, your talking about creating peanut butter babies. Try jerking off in the peanut butter you douche bag!!!
TomBlom0 3 years ago
That is Chuck Missler, the prodigy of teller the father of the hydrogen bomb
worm102 3 years ago
Not true, Tom. Even if you put the exact cell in that jar, nothing will ever turn it into new life. Get a life.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
There is no scientific evidence that dead inert matter can combine with generic energy and produce complex genetic information codes and structures. Evolutionists cannot explain this and so make the huge leap of faith of assuming it somehow did without any intelligent guidance.
Intelligent, conscious, complex information systems require intelligent creation, the belief they can happen by chance is fantasy. This is a much greater leap of faith for the atheist than the believer.
GoldenLightD 3 years ago
Yes, it is evidence, GoldenLight. At some point, evolution must prove itself. Only a dork would believe in evolutionary theory. There is no evidence for life being created from dead matter. None. Synthetic bacteria created in a lab? That's not proof. There's absolutely not proof for evolution. Aliens either did or God did it. That's up to the logician.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
That's the point evolution HAS proven itself over and over again. From micro evolution (like resistance of bacteria, to breeding different types of dogs,or bananas :D) to macro evolution ( the almost fully separation between donkey's and horses) etc...
But I'm probably talking to the scripture 'cuz the brain ain't listening.
religionInsanity 3 years ago
religioninsanity, evolution has never been proven, and your example of "a difference between donkeys and horses" is called adaptation. Not evolution! This is found in many species. I can't believe you're 37 (my age) and actually believe what you're saying. I'm awestruck! Evolution is a total lie, and I can prove it on several levels. However, evolutionists will continue to deny truth even when faced with solid evidence. Also, my brain works fine. I doubt you have my level of education. Good day!
blicksflicks 3 years ago
Okay so your alternative is god...? Which one then? Because there are many gods throughout history and cultures. What proof do you have that god would have created life?
religionInsanity 3 years ago
religioninsanity, donkeys and horses share similar genetic material, but they differ by two chromosomes. They are separate species. Just like there are humans and apes. We did not evolve for one another, and neither did the horse and donkey. In fact they are so similar that they can mate together to create offspring - the mule. But mules are almost always sterile, and cant produce offspring themselves. A genetic defect obviously for the mule. Donkeys and horses do not prove evolution.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
You did not answer the question. What's your alternative and give just ONE tiny bit of proof.
religionInsanity 3 years ago
religioninsanity. It's quite logical. Let me show you from a scientific perspective, okay? Not going to argue with you. I know you don't want to believe in God. Proof evolution does not exist: DNA genetic code with decoders to read the code and use the code. There is no junk DNA. This is a total lie. Computer programs do the same thing, and did anyone write this computer program? You're darn right they did. You can't sit there and honestly believe this intricate, complex code is done by chance.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
religioninsanity, let me give you an example here. I have every letter in the alphabet and all the numbers of the universe. I take them all and throw them up in the air - wait billions and billions of years without any intelligent mind effecting these letters and numbers - and suddenly I get a complex DNA code with decoders, readers and writers? No matter how long you leave that garbage sitting there, someone has to put it together. Aliens or God? You pick. But, evolution? A total lie.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
It seems quite hard for you to get the question? I don't ask you to disprove evolution. I'm just asking you to give one bit of evidence that God has created life in all it's diversity.
religionInsanity 3 years ago
Evidence for God? Well, it's obvious that faith in the God comes by faith alone. It's with a humble heart and sincere mind that we come to God. We get caught up in the things of this world which are temporary, and we pass by many who's lives have been restored by Christ alone. Atheists have so many chances to see the love of Christ. It passes by them and walks towards them, but they walk away to seek the things of this world. Truly, a man must be Born Again, for without this renewal, he is dead.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
So like I said in the beginning. It starts raining scripture from the moment you have to prove something. You know what? Other religions claim exactly the same. Why would you be right? There are far more people believing in something different. Or is it only north America that falls under the grace of god.
religionInsanity 3 years ago
No, that's not true, religioninsanity. Other religions do have a Jesus. :) Muhammad did not die for the sins of the world. Krishna neither. Buddha either. Jah either. Horus either. Ra either. No one but Jesus died for the sins of the world. We are all sinners, and we all fall short the Glory of God. Under the law, we are dead in sin. Only through Christ alone is a man found worthy. Only through Lord Jesus Christ who nailed your sins and mine to a the cross though we rightly deserve death.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
Scripture again!!! But okay.. Now try to do the following. Try to disconnect for just a single moment from this bible thing. And read what you just have written. Jesus died for our sins ... we are all sinners. So god didn't do a good job on forgiving, didn't he? Even newborns are born in sin. It sound Jesus died a most horrible sadistic way in vain, and God let it all happen?? In my current understanding of the law, this is a serious case of neglect.
religionInsanity 3 years ago
religioninsanity, ever lied? Ever stolen something? Ever committed a sexual act out of wedlock? Ever sinned? Just as criminals rightly deserve punishment by the laws of this world, so does the sinner deserve punishment. However, God gave us a get of jail free card. Jesus. He carried our sins on the cross and suffered the punishment for our sins. He died, descended into hell and preached to the Old Testament saints for three days and on the third day He arose. He did this, so we may be with Him.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
So, you see? God is fair. God sacrificed His only son that we may have eternal life with the Lord. He gave us mercy, and by Christ's wounds we are healed. Christ carried our sins on the cross, so that we would not have to suffer the punishment for our own sins. However, if a person rejects Christ's free offering of grace (the get out of jail free card) his sins are upon his own head. 1 John Chapter 2 calls a man who reject Christ an anti-christ, for He denies Christ as the Son of God and Savior.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
Well check this video as an answer to this.
watch?v=B9xTTx1yrx0
religionInsanity 3 years ago
There is no other god than the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The Bible's histories are true. Its words will never pass away. Greater men than you and I have sought to destroy it, but have failed. There is no work of literature in the history of the earth that transcends the Bible. There are no words that match; no stories that parallel or equate with the stories of the Bible. There is no life like Jesus. What He has done could fill the planet in books. He loves us, and He died for our sins.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
that's a highly opinionated view that proves exactly nothing.
wakeangel2001 3 years ago 2
the bible is true, ok so i guess the earth is still flat and the sun and stars revolve around the earth. Wrong, I guess the earth is only 4000 years old too based of that bishop who used the bible to date how old the earth is, again wrong
No other book that transcends the bible? Maybe you should look at the Zohar or the Koran which are both religious text. I bet i was just put on earth as a test of your faith.
TinkToll 3 years ago
If God were to come down into full view of men, for one they would not survive. Two, if God forced us to believe in Him by flashy tricks and powerful signs, where would faith reside? "Jesus said to him, "Is it because you have seen me that you have believed? How blessed are those who have never seen me and yet have believed!" John 20:29. Many will never believe, because they were proud and put their faith in the science of men instead of God's Word. Not everyone will accept Christ.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
Comment removed
dra9onf1re 2 years ago
Okay this argument really proves, you don't understand ANYTHING about evolution. first, DNA wasn't the start of life it came later into the picture. second matter can form itself into complex structures. Have you ever seen a snowflake? How many chances are there that if you have a cloud of random water vapor it can assemble to ice crystals, or is god assembling those all the time? Third, you are talking about abiogenesis now in case you didn't know.
religionInsanity 3 years ago
religioninsa, snowflakes are not human life. This proves nothing. That's Physical Science. Amorphous solids? Solids? Liquids? Gases? Anyone who has taken Physical Science in high school knows that this is not evidence for evolution. Ice crystals are not life. There are no transitional fossils. People have offered loads of money for transitional fossils, and they never appear. If you have transitional fossils, I suggest you deliver them to this guy in Turkey. Heard 10 million Turkish lira.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
there are transitional fossils, i have seen them in the natural history museum in London, Reptiles that have feathers and wings with claws on them , plus not all of them are fossils, There are living creatures out there that aint dead that are transitions between the same species, For example a bat is a rodent and a walrus is desended from an elephant
TinkToll 3 years ago
The transitional fossils you believe are transitional are not truly transitional. Don't you think that more of these would be dug up over time if they existed? I am just curious as to your reasoning. There would have to be a transitional fossil linking everything, and surely they would be found in a the billions, millions or however many did exist tying everything together. It just makes no sense. Evolution is a total lie and deception. At least, please say aliens.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
You miss the point entirely like all creationists. ALL FOSSILS are transitional!
Not all bones etc are preserved, we are lucky to have found as many as have been found.
Just because you have never studied the subject doesn't make it less than factual.
You have been raised by creationists to believe everything happened due to the magic man in the sky. The rest of us believe in the truth.
ZoeMarks 2 years ago
Zoe, you don't know it's true. Put it this way. Evolutionists believe in books written by men and inspired by men. Christians believe in one book written by God, inspired by God and written down by men. Now, evolutionists put their faith in theories, which are not entirely provable. Christians put their faith in God, who isn't entirely provable either. However, I would rather put my faith in a Holy God than a man any day. Look how much men have already screwed up the world.
blicksflicks 2 years ago
I agree with Zoe.
The bible was not written by God. It was written by men who believe there was a God.
A theory is not something you have faith in. Repeated tests support the veracity of the claim for something to be described as a theory.
The current screwing up of the world is over different groups of people with different versions of god.
zzytrewq 2 years ago 3
Also, Zoe? Carbon dating and many other theories of men (scientists?) are merely based on assumptions, theories and gray areas. In truth, no one knows if the world has been here for 10,000 years or 10 billion years. They only make assumptions and use scientific theories to formulate their conclusions. We don't even know if gravity exists. We only call it gravity, because Newton did. We make educated guesses. However, these days, it's about dark matter. Nothing is for sure. God is.
blicksflicks 2 years ago
"theories of men (scientists?) are merely based on assumptions, theories and gray areas. "
Incorrect. Observations, physical evidence and experiment play a larger role in the development of theories than anything you mentioned.
So that's a straw man argument, and not a very convincing one.
"We don't even know if gravity exists."
Gravity is a word which refers to a phenomenon.
The phenomenon is things falling downwards if there's nothing holding them up. Does that happen or not?
m3141592 2 years ago
Zoe, there are no transitional fossils. Please wakeup. A man offer an awful amount of money to any scientist who could bring a real transitional fossil before him. You know what happened? No one showed. They don't exist. If you have a bunch in your closet, you should turn them over to your local library immediately. I'm sure they can put them on display for all the kids.
blicksflicks 2 years ago
"are no transitional fossils."
That must be some definition of transitional with which I was previously unfamiliar.
"A man offer an awful amount of money to any scientist who could bring a real transitional fossil before him. "
Who was he and what was his definition of transitional?
m3141592 2 years ago
You are wrong about the Bible saying the earth is flat. I heard one of my professors in college say that same thing. Isaiah 40:22. Read it. Long before Columbus, Isaiah said the "circle of the earth." Now, some will say it's not a sphere, because he says circle. Well, that's not true either. Circle in Hebrew is "chewg" meaning spherical (circle of expanse) or dancing in a procession much like the planets do. Look it up! The Bible is true. Don't just believe something without study and reading.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
As for you saying the earth is only 4,000 years old, that's not true either by Biblical insight. In fact, the Bible even says that a day to God can be a thousand years. Scripture: 2 Peter 3:8. Now, this means that God's time scale is not necessarily our time scale. In fact, Jesus is often referred to as the Ancient of Days.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
Did you also know that 5,000,000 year old Lucy the corpse was a total lie? Even the guy who found it admitted this. Even the transitional stages from apes to humans is flawed. It's been found riddled with holes. There's no missing link. It's all lies. You need to read this book: The Case for the Creator by Lee Strobel. Look up about Lucy, the transitional stages of ape to man and other lies with which they've riddled our textbooks in high schools nationwide. Some scientists have admitted this.
blicksflicks 3 years ago
Tiktaalik, Archeopteryx, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus Africanis, Homo Erectus, Homo Habilus, Homo Neanderthalis, Microraptor, Marsupials and Monotremes, Nautilus, and several thousand other animals, both living and extinct, mark clear transitions in evolution. Lucy was not a fake, it is still on display in the natural history museum, besides that one fossil is just a tiny fraction of hominids that show the transition of ape to man.
Of course you probably aren't even listening.
wakeangel2001 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
dra9onf1re 2 years ago
A fairy tale? Science is a fairy tale and the bible is the truth. DUH.
I really hope that there is an afterlife so these people don't seem so fucking dumb.
ICreamsodAI 3 years ago
As well all know, carbon atoms consist primarily of Jiff Brand peanut butter flavored quarks. Bah, you use the logic of a 2 year old, please, suits do not automatically make you seem smarter, but logic and basic reasoning skills do. learn things before you try and teach them.
stoopidname4me 3 years ago
dumass, thats why there an experation date. because "LIFE" will form. the peanut butter itself doesnt turn into life. it just produces it. look at the ingreedients. water, protein, ect...building blocks for life.
iLoveJesus369 3 years ago
I was so sure she was going to say "But despite that obvious truth the evolutionists continue building an arsenal of 'facts' and 'logical view points' to combat our Heavenly Father".
Turns out I was wrong.
meric2 3 years ago
On a side note, I'm still waiting to see what food they fight evolution with next. I hope it's a dairy product. I like dairy.
meric2 3 years ago
"Milk prooves the existance of God: By Kirk Camron"
bdpickett 3 years ago
Comment removed
dra9onf1re 2 years ago
Wow i never knew early Earth was a jar of peanut butter. F2ggot Christians life was created with lighting not a fucking jar of peanut butter without the gasses of the early Earth. Idiots they already created life in Cornell University few years ago with the atmosphere of early Earth. They compare peanut butter with lightning. Im pretty sure 100,000,000,000,000 jars of peanut butter would not create enough energy compared to 1 strike of lightning.
WePoopHere 3 years ago
Comment removed
dra9onf1re 2 years ago
It's called preservatives. Evolutionists 1 / Creationists 0
aosdjoifjoie 3 years ago 2
what friggin joke. So then I guess that since i put my keys into my igniton in my car my car starts, but when i put my finger into the ignition it doesn't start, therefor only god can start car. That makes just about as munch sense as this bullshit!
pankow93 3 years ago
wtf? this makes no sense whatsoever!!! First of all, HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THERE IS NO NEW CELLULAR LIFE INSIDE??? YOU HAVE TO DO MORE THAN LOOK AT IT WITH YOUR EYES!!! WHAT ABOUT THINGS LIKE PRESERVATIVES!!! This video also does not acknowledge that MOST OF EVOLUTION IS NOT ABOUT HOW THINGS WERE CREATED, BUT HOW THEY EVOLVED!!! these people are retards
Bitterberry9 3 years ago
Peanut butter is the atheist's nightmare now? Ray Comfort said it was the banana.....their logic sucks but I'm getting a craving for a peanut butter and banana sandwhich at the very least...
JesusIsMyBitch777 3 years ago
i feel today peple that god hasd spoken to me and now i no that evolotion is no real. love our lord
Gart117 3 years ago
please tell me your joking!
pankow93 3 years ago
im considering abandoning my agnosticism and becoming an atheist evolutionist. evolution is false because theres no life in PEANUT BUTTER??? Thats what they came up with??? did they even consider preservatives and all the crap that gets put in peanut butter to STOP bacteria growing in it???
AlmightyFRACTA 3 years ago
That's the worst logic ever, I hold a Christian view point and this is embarrassing
merrytyme4all 3 years ago 3
It's embarrassing for me too. And some Atheists put us in the same category as these dumbasses.
reggiefive0 3 years ago
i had the same creature growing in my peanut butter. if you take him and put him in your sandwich he makes a tasty snake.
godscuttingyoudown 3 years ago
WTF was that inside the jar?
reggiefive0 3 years ago
OMG I NEVER THOUGHT OF IT THAT WAY
makes perfect sense
slightlymentholated 3 years ago
I gave this video four stars because I'm categorizing this in humor.
dalekDan 3 years ago 3
I'd seen 'argument from banana' before, but not this.
How do these people remember to breath?
monoape 3 years ago 2
hehehehehe
fonna 3 years ago
To strengthen its scientific credentials, the Vatican is organising a conference next year to mark the 200th anniversary of the birth of the author of the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin.
BBC. Today.
Religion is man made.
LiononoiL 3 years ago 4
More life from PB @ 4E7iQNv6JxQ
MrFacet 3 years ago
If you like this one, try 4E7iQNv6JxQ !
MrFacet 3 years ago
Right on!
RobertlewisIR 3 years ago
blar lol
deathbyabug 3 years ago
blar lol
deathbyabug 3 years ago
i lol'd
Sandbag209 3 years ago
Thanks everyone for all the great comments.
Hope I made you smile.
:D
19659