You will get double punishment cause to drive people to hell by wasting all the time to let not to blive in god ,,,, do not tell me the we are created by nature mean if yo mix stell and copper and rubber and plastics and gasoline for billions years mean will end up by boing 747 what a joke you atheist read Quran and think better make people blasphemers
I am an athiests but most of the girls i have dated were either christian or catholic, it didn't matter( unless Iwas going to meet the girls parents lol)
Say, "O My servants who have transgressed against themselves [by sinning], do not despair of the mercy of Allah. Indeed, Allah forgives all sins. Indeed, it is He who is the Forgiving, the Merciful." (53) And return [in repentance] to your Lord and submit to Him before the punishment comes upon you; then you will not be helped. (54) And follow the best of what was revealed to you from your Lord before the punishment comes upon you suddenly while you do not perceive, (55) read the holy quran .
I loved this, the conservapedia person posting on this I checked out their page, couldn't leave a comment (was going to make a comment about the lack of a
black or Hispanic in that class). But as usual they can't take the heat. Great job Spontatheist.
You're concerned about the "lack of a black or Hispanic" in a conservapedia class (which is a privately owned company) but are cool with the fact that there are THOUSANDS of racist organisations exclusively for blacks, "Hispanics", and other non-whites, like NAACP, La Raza, etc.
@Prologicful Good lord you are dumb. The NAACP is not a racist organization, you reactionary tool, and it's membership includes those who skin is black and white. Said organizations seek to improve the living standards of colored individuals while pursuing equality of all people. Go back to uncritically swallowing conservative talk-radio.
The NAACP is the National Association for the Advancement of COLORED People. Not EVERYONE. Just COLORED people, specifically BLACK. Get it, moron??? It's a racist organisation. Is this sort of stupidity typical of all Americans or just you?
@Prologicful The NAACP was co-founded by a white socialist woman named Mary White Ovington. It focuses primarily on the plight of colored people, while working "to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons". It often cooperates with other organizations to work/advocate causes that often have nothing specifically to do with race. For example, most recently they "stood in solidarity" with the protesters at Wisconsin. You fail forever.
The NAACP may occasionally assist other groups that aren't exclusively black because such groups have black members (like your Wisconsin union). But most of its activities are aimed at advancing BLACKS. It's a RACIST group.
Who cares what BS they use as their slogan ("to ensure the rights...of all persons")?? Look at what they actually DO.
@Prologicful A quick Google search tells me that in the past couple year alone, the NAACP has worked toward and advocated for such causes as Cap and Trade, Prison reform, California's Prop 19 Marijuana legalization, Childhood obesity, Gay marriage, etc. None of these involve blacks specifically and would probably help all sorts of poor whites. So basically, you have backed your claims with zero evidence and you are nothing but a hysterical shrieky reactionary. Suck it.
@Keithed200 wrote "none of these (issues the NAACP concerns itself with) involve blacks specifically."
The NAACP were and still are an organisation whose primary purpose is to advance the cause of one race(blacks). What's so hard to understand about this??
But because they address and spend money on issues that have little or nothing to do with blacks that makes them OK?? You're an even bigger fucking idiot than I originally thought. Think some of their supporters want their money back?
@Prologicful Well yeah, when a group is focused on the betterment of a people within the scope of trying to achieve equality for all, I don't have a problem with it. If the NAACP was a black supremacy organization then I would have a problem with it but the NAACP is ideologically egalitarian, wants equality for all people and deals with all sorts of different non-colored issues.
@Prologicful Good lord, once again: you are dumb. You have no idea what the NAACP is or what it has done. You have done nothing but make claims and shriek and scream without doing anything to back what you say up. Moreover, you're wrong: I would probably support a white version of the NAACP if such an organization worked not only to just advance the well-being of impoverished whites but of all peoples. God knows there are some people in the South and Midwest who would need it.
If you're white and support the NAACP you're even dumber than I thought. There's nothing more incredibly stupid than someone working against their own interests. Qualified blacks are actively sought by universities and corporations. The NAACP worked to get "Affirmative Action" policies passed in hiring, promotions, scholarships etc, that place LESS qualified blacks ahead of more qualified whites (and often Asians). You're white, remember? How does that help you, shit-for-brains??
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Women generally don't like 3 things: spiders, snakes and atheism. Please see shockofgod's video entitled: Study shows atheist males may have trouble finding a wife
@conservapediavideos Oh, SHIT! I work with spiders, own a snake, and am pretty obviously an atheist. Guess that gives me pick of the litter, doesn't it?
@conservapediavideos I worked with spiders and snakes for five years and I'm an atheist. Guess Spontatheist and I get to choose from many a spider-snake-lovin' atheist man. Oh, and all my female atheist friends who love spiders and snakes. Don't forget them. We could have a party!
I Almost didn't even get to the end of the video though. Only reason I ended up seeing the end is I eventually tuned out and started reading the comments, in particular what MyGrammarRules said.
You see, this all made perfect sense, but then you kind of lost it towards the end, possibly due to confusion in your mind from pink and ponies overload - remember, because women's brains are proportionately smaller than men's means they are not as complicated meaning women have difficulties in holding on to a train of logical train of thought for too long.
You also forgot to mention babies. All women's lives will come to revolve around babies at some point and thus babies will pull them in.
Oh... please forgive my rudeness, well done for making the effort to produce a video, very impressive for a woman to perform such a technical task - and may I say you are looking very pretty today, but it does look as if you may have neglected tidying up the couch, one of your babies has left their toys there. Best run along and get the housework done before your man gets home.
I wish they had this in NYC. Has anyone seen the atheist groups around here? yuck. it's all old homless looking men and women...i mean cmon! You good looking atheists in NYC let's represent!
lol...nice satire... I was laughing the whole time thinking this can't be serious. Its always amusing when people try to use stereotypes to try to appeal to a certain group.
I was so horrified at this video, until I realized this was an elaborate prank XD God, you're good. How do you keep a straight face and a serious voice during this?
Unless of course this isn't a joke...in which case, I think I must then be a man. That explains a lot....
So, now that we have the snark out of the way, what, in your opinion, is the reason for the large differential enrollment numbers when they're sliced down gender lines?
@Fordi - Definitely a good question. My educated guess: it's partially due to social constraints (women generally being expected to be the primary child caregivers and/or housekeepers in their households, even if they hold part- or full-time jobs - which leaves less free time, especially for activities without childcare available), and partially due to the fact that the well-known media darlings of the atheist movement are almost exclusively white males.
@Fordi - It's also important to remember that most forms of Christianity grant more autonomy and authority to males, which I'm willing to bed correlates with a higher level of self-respect and a greater perceived ability to be correct in questioning one's own beliefs.
Since all time (and space and matter) were compressed into a single point at the Singularity, whatever created the Singularity, by definition, had to exist outside time and space.
Existing outside of time means there's no start date, and renders all "Who created the creator?" questions pointless.
Please send me that evidence you have of the universe creating itself, when you have a moment.
@Prologicful So if existing outside of time means there is no start date and renders all "Who created who" questions pointless, why can't we apply this same logic to a universe without some mystical intelligent/divine/supernatural cause? You can't have it both ways dumbass.
Focus like a laser beam, knob. The universe is not infinite, remember? The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says heat flows from hot areas to cold. If the universe was infinite, it would've had forever to cool to absolute zero, but hasn't. It's 2.7 degrees Kelvin.
The universe has a start date called The Big Bang by most. Since it's not infinite and didn't create itself, it was created. Since time, space etc started with the BB, it was created by something OUTSIDE time and space
@Prologicful I never said the universe was infinite. Moreover, the universe does not have a "start date" known to human science. The Big Bang is considered the beginning of the universal expansion, not the universe itself. Before the Big Bang, the universe is proposed to have existed in a state of gravitational singularity, which, by your own admission, precludes time and thus the need for a creator. You literally supplied me with the justification for a universe without god in this argument.
There's NO evidence this is only the latest iteration of an expanding/contracting universe. All indications are that time, space and matter began with the Singularity's expansion (the Big Bang). Therefore, whatever created the Singularity, by necessity, exists outside time and space
Some atheists say an "eternal energy" caused the universe. But for it to exist before the BB, it was nowhere (there's no space), made of nothing (no matter), never (no time)
@Prologicful It sort of astounds me that you're willing to mock atheists for proposing some mystical "eternal energy" existing outside of space, matter, and time and yet do not hold that same standard to your idea of God, for whom these rigorous standards magically do not apply. Moreover, I was not talking about an oscillating universe but merely making the point that actual start date of the universe is so far unknowable because we do not yet objectively know what came before the Big Bang.
@Keithed200 said "we don't know what came before the Big Bang." There's no evidence of ANYTHING before the Big Bang.
I understand atheists who say there's no evidence of a god. But as there's no evidence the universe is infinite nor created itself, something outside the universe did.
I'm a deist. I subscribe to no organised religion because I don't pretend to know the character of a creator. But at least the religous aren't so thick as to think the universe caused itself to happen
@Prologicful I neither subscribe to the idea that universe is infinite or that it created itself. I do not pretend to know what, if anything, preceded the Big Bang and I do not care to speculate mindlessly about it. That said it does bother me when people assert that a "universe that caused itself to happen" is "thick" or ridiculous and then go on to speculate about a Creator that didn't need one of it's own or created itself.
Science holds the universe is between 13.7 billion and 15 billion years old (has a START date). Again, there's no evidence this is only the latest expansion of a chronically expanding/contracting universe. None, naught nothing
The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics also predicts the heat death (entropy) of the universe. So all indications are that we live in a finite universe
Life, intelligence & consciousness from a dead, dumb universe without consciousness is a neat trick, no?
@Prologicful Science holds that it has been 13.75 billion years since the Big Bang, not that the universe is wholly 13.75 billion years old, since it is not known if anything existed before the Big Bang singularity. And while the idea of intelligent life and consciousness springing up is indeed a neat trick, it's not really anymore fantastic than you proposing than your all-powerful creator who just appeared out of thin air and in fact there's more evidence for it.
@AngeloScandal believes in a magical cartoon universe that created itself. Since you don't believe in a creator and there's no evidence the universe is infinite, this is what atheists are left with.
The "Drawing Hands" lithograph by M.C. Escher, (two hands drawing each other) depicts what atheists, by default, say when they say there's no creator.
You, like most logic-challenged atheists, are too stupid to understand that. Then again, if you could comprehend it you wouldn't be an atheist.
@Prologicful Oh really, I am too stupid to understand that as an atheist? Then maybe you with your ignorance, fear of death and indoctrination should teach me a little bit of your wisdom. You fucking idiot.
@Prologicful I have a fear of death in the sense that I treasure my life very much and don't want to die. But beyond that I'm not obsessed that I will be tortured for eternity by some demented god.
@Prologicful And then again your religion doesn't require logic and reasoning, it only requires blind faith and yes.....BELIEF...........I BELIEVE the magic god watches over me and I can fell the holy spirit inside me .....hahahahahahahahha
You can read my mind over the web and tell what my religious beliefs are? You're in the wrong business Brainiac! You're clairvoyant. Why waste time on youtube? Start your own Lisa Williams -style TV show!
I'm a deist. I subscribe to no organised religion so save your "holy spirit" talk. But at least the religious don't think the universe created itself.
Go stand by a church and harangue old ladies about their beliefs. That will make you feel superior!
@Prologicful Oh wow? So now you're telling me that I'm trying to read your mind over the internet. After you sent me a message ASSUMING what my beliefs are as an atheist and responding to claims that YOU, not ME made about the universe?Hahhaha. Well if one of us will do a show about supernatural nonsense, that's gonna be you, not me. Again in the second comment you assume that ALL atheist believe in an an infinite universe which is not true and then you assume we claim superiority,
@Prologicful If you want to debate, go do it with other religious people, especially christians. They might accept your ideas of debate and 'proof' of gods (they accept a lot of nonsense anyways so a little bit more won't matter for them) but we here probably do not. So I'm gonna stop wasting my time with you now.
This is brilliant, I love it! I'm the VP of an atheist group in CT. We don't have much of a problem getting women to our group, but then again, it never hurts to go pinker. Thanks for the tip!
@KaiserTota - women love gay guys, as they provide non-threatening and interested shopping partners. The more of teh ghey your meetup has, the more women you will get!
You will get double punishment cause to drive people to hell by wasting all the time to let not to blive in god ,,,, do not tell me the we are created by nature mean if yo mix stell and copper and rubber and plastics and gasoline for billions years mean will end up by boing 747 what a joke you atheist read Quran and think better make people blasphemers
mazzroa 2 days ago
I am an athiests but most of the girls i have dated were either christian or catholic, it didn't matter( unless Iwas going to meet the girls parents lol)
mandrillx 3 weeks ago
Is this a Joke or what??
We are Atheist , no man atheist or woman atheist , there are not restriccions or discrimination , what is your problem?
EdyMar77 4 weeks ago
Being a staunch atheist is no different from being religious, I'll stick to jerking off and drugs
jlassh 1 month ago 3
I like ponies...am I a woman now?
dragonforce525 1 month ago
"Memories" is what I am officially titling all of my notes from now on...the ladies must come aflocking
ledhotzepper 2 months ago
PONIES!!!!
GreatG0dOm 3 months ago
Say, "O My servants who have transgressed against themselves [by sinning], do not despair of the mercy of Allah. Indeed, Allah forgives all sins. Indeed, it is He who is the Forgiving, the Merciful." (53) And return [in repentance] to your Lord and submit to Him before the punishment comes upon you; then you will not be helped. (54) And follow the best of what was revealed to you from your Lord before the punishment comes upon you suddenly while you do not perceive, (55) read the holy quran .
mazzroa 5 months ago
@mazzroa oh, go away...
moralreef 6 days ago
My speakers aren't even working, and I'm still laughing! Great video!
pchamney 5 months ago
Sooooo pink it is ;p
marsita77 5 months ago
Too funny!
Subscribed.
SabreKitteh 6 months ago
OMG, PONIES! Let's throw a party and get some Pinkie Pie randomness in here!
gruffiki 6 months ago
I want to be your friend.
sevandyk 6 months ago
I can't tell if this video is a satire or not. Half the video is talking about the color pink.
I do agree that we need more ponies, though. Atheist ponies. And every atheist group also needs at least one Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Draginvry2 7 months ago
i hope this is a joke
pupston 7 months ago
I'm an Atheist female, and I -abhor- the colour pink. Absolutely despise it. But, this is funny none-the-less.
DeusadeAgua 7 months ago
What a great fucking video.
DickJohnson3434 8 months ago
pink ponies and pads. are you fucking kidding me?
Adamrsweet 8 months ago
LOVEEE LOVE LOVE!
glitterbypink 8 months ago
Hahaha! A female atheist, that's rich. Nice CGI bro.
sagenev 9 months ago
You'll be there. Find God. <3
DraikzTake 10 months ago
man, I was about to leave until you said ponies, then I was just all "ha, she's such a joker, everyone loves ponies"
ChromeCrash 10 months ago
Bravo!!!
atlasspike 11 months ago
You're making female atheists look too girly :\
unshakenpeace 1 year ago
What about pink and mauve?
MisterEvil1 1 year ago
I loved this, the conservapedia person posting on this I checked out their page, couldn't leave a comment (was going to make a comment about the lack of a
black or Hispanic in that class). But as usual they can't take the heat. Great job Spontatheist.
chomskyfan 1 year ago
@chomskyfan
You're concerned about the "lack of a black or Hispanic" in a conservapedia class (which is a privately owned company) but are cool with the fact that there are THOUSANDS of racist organisations exclusively for blacks, "Hispanics", and other non-whites, like NAACP, La Raza, etc.
That's really smart!
Prologicful 9 months ago
@Prologicful Good lord you are dumb. The NAACP is not a racist organization, you reactionary tool, and it's membership includes those who skin is black and white. Said organizations seek to improve the living standards of colored individuals while pursuing equality of all people. Go back to uncritically swallowing conservative talk-radio.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200
The NAACP is the National Association for the Advancement of COLORED People. Not EVERYONE. Just COLORED people, specifically BLACK. Get it, moron??? It's a racist organisation. Is this sort of stupidity typical of all Americans or just you?
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful The NAACP was co-founded by a white socialist woman named Mary White Ovington. It focuses primarily on the plight of colored people, while working "to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons". It often cooperates with other organizations to work/advocate causes that often have nothing specifically to do with race. For example, most recently they "stood in solidarity" with the protesters at Wisconsin. You fail forever.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200
What planet do you live on?
The NAACP may occasionally assist other groups that aren't exclusively black because such groups have black members (like your Wisconsin union). But most of its activities are aimed at advancing BLACKS. It's a RACIST group.
Who cares what BS they use as their slogan ("to ensure the rights...of all persons")?? Look at what they actually DO.
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful A quick Google search tells me that in the past couple year alone, the NAACP has worked toward and advocated for such causes as Cap and Trade, Prison reform, California's Prop 19 Marijuana legalization, Childhood obesity, Gay marriage, etc. None of these involve blacks specifically and would probably help all sorts of poor whites. So basically, you have backed your claims with zero evidence and you are nothing but a hysterical shrieky reactionary. Suck it.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200 wrote "none of these (issues the NAACP concerns itself with) involve blacks specifically."
The NAACP were and still are an organisation whose primary purpose is to advance the cause of one race(blacks). What's so hard to understand about this??
But because they address and spend money on issues that have little or nothing to do with blacks that makes them OK?? You're an even bigger fucking idiot than I originally thought. Think some of their supporters want their money back?
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful Well yeah, when a group is focused on the betterment of a people within the scope of trying to achieve equality for all, I don't have a problem with it. If the NAACP was a black supremacy organization then I would have a problem with it but the NAACP is ideologically egalitarian, wants equality for all people and deals with all sorts of different non-colored issues.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200
If NAACP truly wanted to help those who need it, it would work to help POOR people, no matter what their race.
But they don't work to help poor people, per say. They only work for BLACKS, as if there's no such thing as a poor white or wealthy black.
You'd never tolerate a group advancing the interests of whites, yet you support a racist group, even though you're not a member of their race.
They saw you coming from a mile away. Here's 2p, try to buy a clue, Einstein
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful Good lord, once again: you are dumb. You have no idea what the NAACP is or what it has done. You have done nothing but make claims and shriek and scream without doing anything to back what you say up. Moreover, you're wrong: I would probably support a white version of the NAACP if such an organization worked not only to just advance the well-being of impoverished whites but of all peoples. God knows there are some people in the South and Midwest who would need it.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200
If you're white and support the NAACP you're even dumber than I thought. There's nothing more incredibly stupid than someone working against their own interests. Qualified blacks are actively sought by universities and corporations. The NAACP worked to get "Affirmative Action" policies passed in hiring, promotions, scholarships etc, that place LESS qualified blacks ahead of more qualified whites (and often Asians). You're white, remember? How does that help you, shit-for-brains??
Prologicful 8 months ago
What if your a carnie atheist?
Would blindfolded ponies with pink saddles work as dodgems and attract ladies?
Thoughtland 1 year ago
we just love the shit out of ponies...lol
popceed 1 year ago
"We will stop the car!"- lol!
lenkel 1 year ago
I thought you were serious until the last line. Silly me.
alexkram 1 year ago
I gave this video a thumbs up because I "love the shit out of ponies"!
Grimwyrd 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Women generally don't like 3 things: spiders, snakes and atheism. Please see shockofgod's video entitled: Study shows atheist males may have trouble finding a wife
conservapediavideos 1 year ago
@conservapediavideos Oh, SHIT! I work with spiders, own a snake, and am pretty obviously an atheist. Guess that gives me pick of the litter, doesn't it?
Spontatheist 1 year ago 18
@Spontatheist are you a virgin?
romans52345 2 months ago
@conservapediavideos your full of shit
MrEnlightenup 6 months ago
@conservapediavideos yes christian males have no problem, just look at the divorce rate!
jubjubmh316 6 months ago
@conservapediavideos I worked with spiders and snakes for five years and I'm an atheist. Guess Spontatheist and I get to choose from many a spider-snake-lovin' atheist man. Oh, and all my female atheist friends who love spiders and snakes. Don't forget them. We could have a party!
sitakaliism 3 months ago
@conservapediavideos actually, I do have trouble finding a smart, intelligent and atheist girlfriend cause they are so rare...
Rayder4Life 1 month ago
@conservapediavideos nice general observations. where did you study such reasoning, the University of Making Shit Up On The Spot?
oh wait its Conservapedia. same thing.
moralreef 6 days ago
Comment removed
conservapediavideos 1 year ago
Question: Why are athiest women so ugly? Answer: God made them that way. =)
happyninslave 1 year ago
@happyninslave You and dane cook would make great friends.
batmanpronz 1 year ago
I Almost didn't even get to the end of the video though. Only reason I ended up seeing the end is I eventually tuned out and started reading the comments, in particular what MyGrammarRules said.
MsHojat 1 year ago
I thought i needed a kitchen to attract them :(
If i only saw this video before i realized that woman are individuals and not a giant mass under a swarm mind thing!
TheVoices297 1 year ago
You see, this all made perfect sense, but then you kind of lost it towards the end, possibly due to confusion in your mind from pink and ponies overload - remember, because women's brains are proportionately smaller than men's means they are not as complicated meaning women have difficulties in holding on to a train of logical train of thought for too long.
You also forgot to mention babies. All women's lives will come to revolve around babies at some point and thus babies will pull them in.
AnonEyeMouse 1 year ago
@AnonEyeMouse
Oh... please forgive my rudeness, well done for making the effort to produce a video, very impressive for a woman to perform such a technical task - and may I say you are looking very pretty today, but it does look as if you may have neglected tidying up the couch, one of your babies has left their toys there. Best run along and get the housework done before your man gets home.
There's a sweet little thing.
AnonEyeMouse 1 year ago
Through the whole thing I was thinking, "WTF?" but then you killed it! I love it!
MyGrammarRules 1 year ago
say what?
porridgeeveryday 1 year ago
Many females join my Atheist group. I make it clear that like any true Humanist, I'm also a Feminist. The fact that I'm hot probably helps too.
manoric82 1 year ago
Or maybe providing cooking supplies...I hear ladies like to bake.
dave28lax 1 year ago
You're amazing! Subscribed.
luckystrke 1 year ago
I'm not homophobic but Pink is quite a gay color for most men.
Neueregel 1 year ago
lol
issuesmattertome 1 year ago
All the time I thought; Is she serious?
But the last point made the sarcasm clear.
Who would treat women as individuals.
And now you better get me a sandwich.
HiltownJoe 1 year ago
I wish they had this in NYC. Has anyone seen the atheist groups around here? yuck. it's all old homless looking men and women...i mean cmon! You good looking atheists in NYC let's represent!
maddtappin 1 year ago
I think by this we will end up with a bunch of Five Year old Female Atheists XD
Bloodster8 1 year ago
EPIC!
healthyaddict 1 year ago
Oh, the last line ruined it.
jericsynergy 1 year ago
Fantastic first video with a great message at the end, though respecting women sounds hard, I'll think I will stick with the pink stuff :P hehe
rabbitpirate 1 year ago
lol...nice satire... I was laughing the whole time thinking this can't be serious. Its always amusing when people try to use stereotypes to try to appeal to a certain group.
catsgotmytongue 1 year ago
your straight face: HOW?? i was dying
undertehlaw 1 year ago
MAKE. MORE. VIDEOS.
you're fucking awesome.
SoFlyCee 1 year ago 13
PWNies
ljonesvc 1 year ago
LMAO!!!! I see what you did there! you forgot to mention unicornsand pegasii, or unipegasii.
seriously though great way to make your point.
darthmalys 1 year ago
I was so horrified at this video, until I realized this was an elaborate prank XD God, you're good. How do you keep a straight face and a serious voice during this?
Unless of course this isn't a joke...in which case, I think I must then be a man. That explains a lot....
DancingInTheRain73 1 year ago
Great video!
unsorted1138 1 year ago
So, now that we have the snark out of the way, what, in your opinion, is the reason for the large differential enrollment numbers when they're sliced down gender lines?
Fordi 1 year ago
@Fordi - Definitely a good question. My educated guess: it's partially due to social constraints (women generally being expected to be the primary child caregivers and/or housekeepers in their households, even if they hold part- or full-time jobs - which leaves less free time, especially for activities without childcare available), and partially due to the fact that the well-known media darlings of the atheist movement are almost exclusively white males.
Spontatheist 1 year ago
@Spontatheist Almost exclusively white males, you're right, but what about Eugenie Scott? God I love that lady.
Rocky183 1 year ago
@Spontatheist Well said!!!
eMomoko 1 year ago
@Fordi - It's also important to remember that most forms of Christianity grant more autonomy and authority to males, which I'm willing to bed correlates with a higher level of self-respect and a greater perceived ability to be correct in questioning one's own beliefs.
Spontatheist 1 year ago 2
@Spontatheist Even more well said!!!
eMomoko 1 year ago
@Spontatheist Even more well said!!! Not just Christianity, most religions today.
eMomoko 1 year ago
@Spontatheist
Since you don't believe the universe was created, by logical necessity, you are saying it created itself.
That's really intelligent!
Prologicful 9 months ago
@Prologicful Though clearly not as intelligent as a designer who designed herself.
Spontatheist 9 months ago 6
@Spontatheist
I never said a "designer designed herself."
Since all time (and space and matter) were compressed into a single point at the Singularity, whatever created the Singularity, by definition, had to exist outside time and space.
Existing outside of time means there's no start date, and renders all "Who created the creator?" questions pointless.
Please send me that evidence you have of the universe creating itself, when you have a moment.
Prologicful 9 months ago
@Prologicful Please post the evidence of a being existing outside of time that creates universes, cheers.
brono25 9 months ago
@Prologicful So if existing outside of time means there is no start date and renders all "Who created who" questions pointless, why can't we apply this same logic to a universe without some mystical intelligent/divine/supernatural cause? You can't have it both ways dumbass.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200
Focus like a laser beam, knob. The universe is not infinite, remember? The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says heat flows from hot areas to cold. If the universe was infinite, it would've had forever to cool to absolute zero, but hasn't. It's 2.7 degrees Kelvin.
The universe has a start date called The Big Bang by most. Since it's not infinite and didn't create itself, it was created. Since time, space etc started with the BB, it was created by something OUTSIDE time and space
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful I never said the universe was infinite. Moreover, the universe does not have a "start date" known to human science. The Big Bang is considered the beginning of the universal expansion, not the universe itself. Before the Big Bang, the universe is proposed to have existed in a state of gravitational singularity, which, by your own admission, precludes time and thus the need for a creator. You literally supplied me with the justification for a universe without god in this argument.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200
There's NO evidence this is only the latest iteration of an expanding/contracting universe. All indications are that time, space and matter began with the Singularity's expansion (the Big Bang). Therefore, whatever created the Singularity, by necessity, exists outside time and space
Some atheists say an "eternal energy" caused the universe. But for it to exist before the BB, it was nowhere (there's no space), made of nothing (no matter), never (no time)
Good luck proving that.
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful It sort of astounds me that you're willing to mock atheists for proposing some mystical "eternal energy" existing outside of space, matter, and time and yet do not hold that same standard to your idea of God, for whom these rigorous standards magically do not apply. Moreover, I was not talking about an oscillating universe but merely making the point that actual start date of the universe is so far unknowable because we do not yet objectively know what came before the Big Bang.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200 said "we don't know what came before the Big Bang." There's no evidence of ANYTHING before the Big Bang.
I understand atheists who say there's no evidence of a god. But as there's no evidence the universe is infinite nor created itself, something outside the universe did.
I'm a deist. I subscribe to no organised religion because I don't pretend to know the character of a creator. But at least the religous aren't so thick as to think the universe caused itself to happen
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful I neither subscribe to the idea that universe is infinite or that it created itself. I do not pretend to know what, if anything, preceded the Big Bang and I do not care to speculate mindlessly about it. That said it does bother me when people assert that a "universe that caused itself to happen" is "thick" or ridiculous and then go on to speculate about a Creator that didn't need one of it's own or created itself.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Keithed200
Science holds the universe is between 13.7 billion and 15 billion years old (has a START date). Again, there's no evidence this is only the latest expansion of a chronically expanding/contracting universe. None, naught nothing
The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics also predicts the heat death (entropy) of the universe. So all indications are that we live in a finite universe
Life, intelligence & consciousness from a dead, dumb universe without consciousness is a neat trick, no?
Prologicful 8 months ago
@Prologicful Science holds that it has been 13.75 billion years since the Big Bang, not that the universe is wholly 13.75 billion years old, since it is not known if anything existed before the Big Bang singularity. And while the idea of intelligent life and consciousness springing up is indeed a neat trick, it's not really anymore fantastic than you proposing than your all-powerful creator who just appeared out of thin air and in fact there's more evidence for it.
Keithed200 8 months ago
@Prologicful HO! so it's REEEALLY inteligent from your part that some guy create himself? thats really logic ¬¬
kanek999 8 months ago
@Prologicful Man, that girl just destroyed you. Run and cry to your imaginary god :)))
AngeloScandal 7 months ago
@AngeloScandal believes in a magical cartoon universe that created itself. Since you don't believe in a creator and there's no evidence the universe is infinite, this is what atheists are left with.
The "Drawing Hands" lithograph by M.C. Escher, (two hands drawing each other) depicts what atheists, by default, say when they say there's no creator.
You, like most logic-challenged atheists, are too stupid to understand that. Then again, if you could comprehend it you wouldn't be an atheist.
Prologicful 7 months ago
@Prologicful Oh really, I am too stupid to understand that as an atheist? Then maybe you with your ignorance, fear of death and indoctrination should teach me a little bit of your wisdom. You fucking idiot.
AngeloScandal 7 months ago
@AngeloScandal
Sure, here's some wisdom for you: since you have no fear of death, go kill yourself. After all, you're not afraid of it.
Prologicful 7 months ago
@Prologicful I have a fear of death in the sense that I treasure my life very much and don't want to die. But beyond that I'm not obsessed that I will be tortured for eternity by some demented god.
AngeloScandal 7 months ago 2
@Prologicful And then again your religion doesn't require logic and reasoning, it only requires blind faith and yes.....BELIEF...........I BELIEVE the magic god watches over me and I can fell the holy spirit inside me .....hahahahahahahahha
AngeloScandal 7 months ago
@AngeloScandal
You can read my mind over the web and tell what my religious beliefs are? You're in the wrong business Brainiac! You're clairvoyant. Why waste time on youtube? Start your own Lisa Williams -style TV show!
I'm a deist. I subscribe to no organised religion so save your "holy spirit" talk. But at least the religious don't think the universe created itself.
Go stand by a church and harangue old ladies about their beliefs. That will make you feel superior!
Prologicful 7 months ago
@Prologicful Oh wow? So now you're telling me that I'm trying to read your mind over the internet. After you sent me a message ASSUMING what my beliefs are as an atheist and responding to claims that YOU, not ME made about the universe?Hahhaha. Well if one of us will do a show about supernatural nonsense, that's gonna be you, not me. Again in the second comment you assume that ALL atheist believe in an an infinite universe which is not true and then you assume we claim superiority,
AngeloScandal 7 months ago
@Prologicful If you want to debate, go do it with other religious people, especially christians. They might accept your ideas of debate and 'proof' of gods (they accept a lot of nonsense anyways so a little bit more won't matter for them) but we here probably do not. So I'm gonna stop wasting my time with you now.
AngeloScandal 7 months ago
Scrapbooking photos of pink ponies FTW? That whole treat women with respect angle appears sound on the surface, but I am still dubious.
linuxfiend 1 year ago
hysterical! My meetups have been accused of being sausagefests; I think we should have more ponies.
vegansato 1 year ago
You've got nice tits.
dookdawg214 1 year ago
Sage advice.
...well.. technically pink advice, but you know what I mean.
TETSUno1 1 year ago
Lol i love it
gifferqqq 1 year ago
The last 10 seconds of this video is golden.
endthedisease 1 year ago 4
@endthedisease No, tried that - doesn't work
garethb1961 9 months ago
Hello Katy, so why did you make this video?
sonofagunM357 1 year ago
So dye some ponies pink and set up pony rides at your atheist meeting?
NemoUtopian 1 year ago
This is brilliant, I love it! I'm the VP of an atheist group in CT. We don't have much of a problem getting women to our group, but then again, it never hurts to go pinker. Thanks for the tip!
danxenatro 1 year ago
What if all that pink ends up attracting teh ghey?
KaiserTota 1 year ago
@KaiserTota - women love gay guys, as they provide non-threatening and interested shopping partners. The more of teh ghey your meetup has, the more women you will get!
It's science...
Crommunist 1 year ago