Added: 3 years ago
From: BongHitBrian
Views: 18,959
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Here is a Great Idea....for more find me and be the Certified Brother in the U.S of A ; to make sure Student Engineer spies don't learn how to leave a Geometrical-and Aerodynamical finger-print behind. Yet, it all comes down to THE ELEGANCE OF THE F-16. WHAT THE F-14 MEANS. ....and some Men are born to fly !!!!!!!!

    REQUIRE A HEART'S MEDALLION TEST OF COURAGE, TENDERNESS, INWARDS CONTROL OF THE EXPRESSION OF ANY EMOTION- ON THE SPECTRUM BY SELF EXAMPLE.  THEN AN ACCELORATOR GEAR OR BRAKE?

  • yeah true. but this aircraft comes from the early 80's. It competed against the F-15 super eagle. We know who took the contract

  • @my85svo1 OOOOOHHHHH! got'em

  • At this point, other than for an export version, there is no point in upgrading the F-16. The F-35 is going to take over for it.

  • I would say that the F-16XL would be less maneuverable than the normal F-16. There's a reason why pure deltas (ie without canards) aren't used much anymore in spite of being faster and more efficient.

  • I agree. It would need canards in order to be more maneuverable than the original F-16, but it would increase drag, which would probably lower its max speed. It doesn't matter though, because as a strike fighter it focuses more on air-to-ground capability than air-to-air, making agility less relevant. More important would be the speed to get in and get out quick!

    Pity the F-15E was chosen. This is a much more interesting aircraft. What would it have been called? I like 'Blast Falcon'.

  • Not to mention that the XL would have had a smaller RCS.That is also a fact to consider

  • Yes, it was in competition to become the new Enhanced Tactical Fighter (ETF), a kind of Ground Attack Strike Fighter for the Air Force. Unfortunately, the AF choose the F-15E Strike Eagle instead.

    It's too bad, the F-16XL looks very futuristic and maneuverable.

  • Unfortunately?

    Did you know the F-15E can carry more payload than a B-17?

    And @ 2.5 Mach, AND MUCH more maneuverable than the XL.

    Not only that, the F-15 survivability is IMMENSELY higher.

    F-16, slightly more maneuverable.

    F-15 beats it in every other category.

  • Anybody know the reason, why the US did not stick to this new design? It looks promising.

  • the disighn ment the aircraft was way to stable it couldent monuver well

  • F-16 XL is now offered to india as F-16IN with supercuise capability and AESA radar for the ongoing MCRA 126 jet tender.

  • this plane was the xl that the americans proposed but the us military when for the f15-e instead

  • the design can be seen in LCA tejas, an Indian fighter plane, which is currently is undergoing testing.

  • I know, DUH!

    I'm just saying that's what the French Rafale F1 looks like.

  • That's basically what the French Rafale F1 looks like.

  • Are you blind? It's a delta wing F-16.

  • not really the rafale is a single delta wing not a double deta like the xl

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more