Famous nobel winning Physicist John Wheeler had this to say "The quantum process has nothing to do with counciousness." When physicists use the word "OBSERVER" they are refering to a non counsciess "MEASURING DEVICE" that collides photons against electrons. The collision destroys the exterior waves leaving only the stronger interior waves intact a particle is just the inside uncollapsble strong wave. Way to manipulate/batardize terminology to mean something else completly for your agenda.
@darkstar1987lx what? that is rubbish. Stuff like that isn't alive that has a process of thought. That would mean we have found 'life' in outer space. a single electron doesnt have any processes for it to "see" and visualise and change it's actions. Absolute rubbish.
lol at the black kid pretending to be smart and having a hint of nervousness in his memorised recital.
TBH how can an observing microscope placed next to the double slit experiment effect the result? ie , if you take the observing device away how does that change it? HOW can an electron be 'self-aware' and change it's behavior ??? like it is trolling? i dont get it?
@jeremyrules7 Electron is energy, you are energy, your whole body is energy at a high rate of vibration, and if you (wich is energy) can think, then the electron (wich is energy as well) can most possibly think too!
Don't think humans are the only things in the universe with a mind to make decisions and choices, pretty much EVERYTHING is alive...
so we make realities when we are not observing one.when we do we cant percieve the others.Why is that?Could it be that in every choise we have to make,we create different paralele realities,that we have chosen other reallities?
@ED4action Dunnno, it depends on whether or not the tree made any sound when it fell, and the pope would be a Jew either way. WELCOME TO QUANTUM PHYSICS
They have it wrong, things don't just "snap" into place when we see them, our BRAIN is just collecting the information, formulating it, and then relaying to our eyes which then goes back into the brain.
This isn't a PHYSICAL thing, it's just how vision works really.
@cupwnd I agree that this movie skews facts for an agenda (the rhetoric is pretty transparent). What i do like is that they present the facts clear enough for most people to understand. Therefore, if the viewer is versed well in rhetoric and picking apart fact from fiction, this is a pretty informative work on the basic workings of some theories of quantum physics. The next step that the viewer must take is go beyond this movie and do their own research to better understand these concepts.
@cupwnd I just watched it. You're pretty much saying what I was thinking as I watched it. Certain experiments they used out of context and I hate the whole metaphysical spin on it (and I'm a practitioner of witchcraft, figure that one out). I had an English lit class in high school that was nothing but teaching how rhetoric and bias works so that we could pick apart things like that. They're using true facets of quantum physics (I confirmed them first) to support that agenda and that's wrong
This video is what gave me a gestalt (revelation) of the Trinity. The three in One. The Godhead. Totally believable in Particle theory. I saw this two years ago and cried.
@XXDJxJ03XX Well you can't really feel an electron. Remember, superposition applies to sub-atomic particles, and, for example, a basketball is already made up of definite, single location particles. Furthermore, I don't like the idea that the observer in fact collapses the wave function. I prefer that instead the reaction required to observe (a photon bounces off of something and carries its information into your eye) collapses it.
@TehAl3X Why would the particle give a shit you are observing it. IT doesn't make sense that we would see anything at all. If its existence is in many places, it makes sense that we either see that or we are unable to perceive it. Why would it be recorded that it clicks into one place for our observation?
@TehAl3X The photon hitting it and going to your eye isn't what collapses it though. Hitting something with a photon isn't going to make it stop acting as a wave now is it.
@TehAl3X The truth is that we have no idea whatsoever what happens to collapse the wave function of the electrons. Your speculation that a photon and I paraphrase "bouncing" off the electrons would have that effect, is just that, speculation.
if what we believed came true then why do things surprise us? I think consciousness might play a roll in changing the way electrons behave, but I don't think we should jump to crazy conclusions just yet lol
a good way to understand the concept of the same thing in different places is to think of yourself. picture yourself at 3 different locations in your home at the same time. not 3 of you, just one. anything you do, say, or think at one location, you must do, say, or think at the others because you are one being at all 3 locations.
@aaron8862006 but what if instead of this being right, math was just wrong? oh what a strange thought. the concept of math is a human based structure meaning it is susceptible to error. yet we are raised to believe that math is perfect. what if math is wrong? anyone ever thought of that? i am just messing around but still posing a serious question
@aaron8862006 haha delude yourself, your already watching this video. have you done your research. this move was developed by a cult. and is highly criticized for its misrepresentation of quantum mechanics. yes quantum mechanics is scientific fact. but this move makes and an un scientifically founded jump into the physcological aspects of quantum mechanics. you can believe what ever you want. just do your research first:)
Your statement is circular logic. Math is not perfect because it is simply provably perfect. "Simply" is a term used to avoid having to prove a statement with evidence and simply negates all other factors that might prove the statement to be wrong. From your comment you basically just said "Math is perfect because we are told it is perfect".
Uhm, could you compare this to crossing your eyes? You cross your eyes while looking at a ball and you SEE two balls. You look at one wave function but you SEE 500. Is that a good way of explaining it?
when we do not observe an object, (look at it objectively) we see that the truth is that it is in many places at once, or possibly none at all,
but when we DO observe an object, we are in all the same places that it is, and none of the places it isnt, so we do not notice anything odd. We are all in many places, we are all in one place.
@Steaksngainers i think this is the entanglement theory, we are all connected somehow and thus this innate strangeness of being in all places at once and being in no place at all does not seem odd to us
@Steaksngainers I like this. if the object is in all places then we too are in all places. but why do we perceive the singularity of ourselves and all objects rather than the simultaneous expression of them in all places? perhaps it is evolutionary, we evolved from an all sensing perspective into a line of expression from which we view everything as singular? i.e. perhaps our human senses have refined themselves over time to make sense of individual items rather than a sea of possibility?
@aaaaaaaaaaandrew hey bro, thanks for the comment, that's an interesting thought. We know our minds filter out a lot of useless information, maybe this is just one more thing. :)
SteaksnGainers was my old account, but I can't get back in because I can't link a Gmail account. This is my new channel, I'll send you a FR.
@Steaksngainers :) We ourselves are the observer and observed. We are everything and everywhere and everyone all at once always and in all places because consciousness/fractality/light (all interchangeable) is what we are we. We are god. God is the first awakening of the One and contains all of the One. "God" as humans call it is and think of it in the metaphysical aspect is the primal essence and full awareness of the one in its own consciousness. We are god and we have the potential to become.
@Steaksngainers contd..... "God" as we move up in the scale frequency of the one hence becoming more fractal in our vantage point of consciousness hence becoming more aware of our eternal and infinite integration with everything that is the one. :)
@Steaksngainers Can you explain this theory to me as it relates to the Law of Attraction and how our thoughts and feelings shape our lives. Thanks in advance.
@Steaksngainers maybe this observer are the light particles we project onto the thing we observe so thats why the particles act differently because of the light.
@Steaksngainers@Steaksngainers maybe this observer is the light particles we project onto the thing we observe so thats why the particles act differently because of the light interfering
@Steaksngainers I'd hit you up if you made any sense. Saying the object is in many places at the same time is acceptable. Your conclusion is not... doesn't follow and I don't know what you mean.
@Steaksngainers I try to use it in my own life; why do I do what I do, what made my decision and how can I see what I couldn't see before, because my brain was trained in a different direction... and to tell you the truth I can feel the answer but when I try to grab it, it's gone....
As far as I can see we cannot see anything odd, because we cannot see what our brain doesn't recognize
@Steaksngainers Your point is valid and truthful. But the way i look at i, is that ; since we recieve information about the universe, and at the same time project that information, the matter of the fact is, we project what our subconscious mind expects!
If you expect to see a tree in front of you, then you will see it, if not, the same applies!
Just like with what we see, the same thing happens at tact level, if you expect something to be hard, then it will be, and so on, and so forth...
The main problem with these theories and ideas though, is that they're trying to apply a FACT that works on a micro level to a THEORY on a macro level. It may be true, but there's a lot of work to do. Quantum laws dictate on subatomic levels, and Newtonian laws dictate on the larger level. What they're trying to do is find the connection between them, and it's very hard, and possibly impossible.
i love this. But i'd like everyone to kindly stop observing me, so that i can be everywhere, please! i wonder what would happen if everyperson on the planet meditated into a "not observing" state all at once! cool, perhaps then a revolution would happen...
im confused. if a particle is in 2 places at once when you look at it shouldnt you only see one not see the same particle in two places because it decides to go to one place?
@023132 You are confused heh. When the electron is observed, then it becomes a single particle and goes through one or the other slits. When NOT observed, it exists in many locations at once as a wave. The act of observation changes the behaviour.
@Ragnarok187 ya i get that its just the guy said he could see 2 of the same particle in different places. but he observed it so shouldnt it go into one place not stay in 2 places because hes looking at it
No, its not a real science documentary. There are certain elements of it which are scientifically sound, but then they use that to twist other things around, and contort your thinking to achieve their goals. The goal is to attempt to confuse viewers into believing that there is a tie between quantum physics and spirituality.
have u ever heard a rapper take his music as far as the universe listen to my song called off earth i guarantee its like nothin u ever heard before just go to my page
please.. do not take these weirdos word for what they are saying!.. I am not on about the interviewees, im on about the new age makers... they have cut & cooked the interviews here to make it look like the they are agreeing with the producers:)))
C'MON GUYS, DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK & DOUBLE CHECK WHAT THEY ARE SAYING!!!... EVEN EMAIL THE PPL BEEN INTERVIEWED & THEY WILL TELL YA THE SAME THING... I AM TELLING YOU THIS CAUSE THEY TOLD ME THIS.. WaKe ThE fUcK uP............ReSpEcT & LoVe To AlL:))
@Eirexeyes have u ever heard a rapper take his music as far as the universe listen to my song called off earth i guarantee its like nothin u ever heard before just go to my page
@thegoods420 umm, who the fuck are you!??... from your reply .. i know now that you are a lier & was never interviewed by these loonies.. you are a pleb!
looks like the main question is who is it that is the obseviour of the senses i think this all pionts to the world being subjective and some people have realized this a long time ago like the religons, i think the main diffrence is that sience wants to contol the reality religion wants just to no how it is happening like (who am i) am i actualy this person or is this person subjective to me is this world subjective like a dream
Triangulation? The fact that we have (unless deaf or blind or such) five senses? Mean anything to anyone. The reason why more than one witness is required to confirm & judge the accuracy of prophecy? Purposeful?
im just like the slit experiment.whem im alone im all over minds thinking about a million things im a lunatic.then when someone asks''what are you doing,i freeze''words can not express my random persolality.i only give them what they want so they stop asking.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT something bad will happen. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS ACTUALLY WORKS
maybe there would not be so many paradoxes if we assume that our universes' wave function has already collapsed during the big bang. This could mean that all events that have and will occur were already pre-determined at the big bang.
Love it. ... . Tory from Austin Texas. Singer songwriter musician. Check out my originals and subscribe if you like. Please listen to my own original This one was inspired by the Movie What the Bleep do we Know? . Namaste
What about the birth? Is it also an illusion?..Sperms?....I think they are just predicting for now...It is not a subject that calculations or numbers can solve cause i believe that a human conciousness can create endless combinations of formulas to reach different resolutions. ( as they also mention)...But i still wonder how they can explain the reproduction in this way..
When you try to comprehend this, its alot like the movie Next with Nicholas Cage, where when hes choosing his future, he is going through many possibility's at the same time. interesting.
@Tryinitonmyown yep¡ i watched it too ages ago and ever since then ive just been finding more and more things that proove it.. and it really does work 100%
@anonimystro12345@malonde Quantum physics is a legitimate field of study. However, this 'film' portrays it very poorly, they are trying to turn quantum mechanics into some sort of spiritual "all of reality is just thought" crap. it is very difficult for laypeople to differentiate where the quantum mechanics stops and quantum bullshit begins. This movie is largely pseudoscience. i think anonimystro, you are one of these people who failed to make the distinction between science and bullshit.
@anonimystro12345 of course some of it is science. But i think that people who don't already know things about quantum mechanics might be mislead entirely by this film. like the ball bouncing. it retains the principles but is exaggerated (quantum wave function collapse is not a large scale thing, the ball isn't everywhere when we are not looking, which im sure you know) combining this exaggeration of quantum mechanics mixed with this mysticism its shit. the very beginning is alright though.
@anonimystro12345 I kinda know how the thing were the something in more dan 1 place works and there wrong it is in one place cause if u touch your just gona feal it in one place I know because I have a trick I devoleped as a kid were if I try to see with each eye individualy on a certain object I can get 2 or more Images or words for now i can only do it with littles thing but If i touch it Ill only feal 1 thing in the original place remember da eyes out of all senses is da most easy to fool
I call BS on that the quantum world is way smaller than DVD players, satellites and bar-codes. DVD are based on scratches on the disc that a laser reflects off of and understands what each scratch means...... bar codes are just read but the pattern of lines on them..... and satellites well depends what kind of satellite... but they don't use quantum physics
because it's just too weird to grasp it as being plausible, if you have a little bit to do with this you know it's not just some stupid storieds ,it's just presented like this to be easier to grasp by any person out there.
You know to browse through here and see all the thumbs up for the people discounting this video, I'd like to be pointed in a direction where the principles in this video are proved wrong. People puffing out their chests and saying "Wrong!", and not explaining why seems sort of counter productive. It's only theory after all.
@Gymmarn I'm fail?! You just proved my point. Way to go Einstein. "They try to explain quantum mechanics on a macro scale" to discount an entire documentary as dung. Wow. Should have just hired you to do the documentary. You could have said "Pff... bullcrap", and it'd be over. Surprised you made it to PART 5 actually. I would have thought you would have seen the first ten minutes and written youtube to take it down or something. But nah, you're right. I'm fail. I'm fail at understanding people.
@Gymmarn actually the goal of this video is to demonstrate how the underlying quantum interacts with macro and has some effect in the macro world. see the difference? demonstrating how at different levels, radically different rules apply
@malonde, the problem is that this kind of theory involves some pretty radical changes in perception, which goes into metaphysics and things that aren't directly related to science. However, I think the ideas being discussed here are extremely interesting and I think there may one day be a way to prove or test these theories.
@malonde I don't know that it is wrong, but rather that it is irrelevant. Firstly we haven't evolved the sensory mechanisms to take advantage of these potentials.... secondly if you actually lived your life thinking about this stuff day to day you would end up being committed.
@malonde Anything that threatens what they have been programed to beileve must be wrong. They are of the same mentality as people back when the when the Sun was believed to revovle around the Earth that persecuted or ridculed those who said otherwise. Everything that doesn't support the programming "does not compute" therefore it must be a lie. Yes, after all this is just theory.
@bachelor2009 Who says you can't theorize off of fact? It's done all the time. To think that we know all there is to know, and there is nothing else is very, very arrogant. I'm just saying ...
@malonde Things have to be proven right, that's the problem with both this documentary and religion. We can make theories about anything, but the only way we can make any sense of it is by only believing in the theories which have been proven to be accurate. For example, the things observed in quantum mechanics were observed and thus hold some truth to them, but trying to explain why and how they work is be purely theoretical and thus not yet scientific or factual for that matter.
@malonde The reason why we don't just accept it as a theory is because in science theories require more than just "Here's what I think..." They require an explanation of how one at arrived at that answer which makes sense according to what we know. If you cannot provide an answer to said question, because we know too little, then it is best to admit that and wait until we know more. You shouldn't commend them for trying because they really aren't trying.
@malonde I know on the surface it looks bad to be so negative and shut down opposing ideas. However, as we learn early on in school, one must be able to show one's work. It is fine to have a hypotheses, but in order for it to be a theory you must show your work. You don't have to prove it, but you have to show how you arrived at said conclusion. Merely presenting a mystery, mentioning it is unexplained, and then suggesting it must be beyond us is not good enough.
The problem is that a lot of the conclusions people reach in these videos are essentially unfalsifiable. They arrived at these conclusions through no scientific means and are completely wild-haired theories made up in order to provide an "answer" to things we don't know regardless of whether how they arrived at said conclusion makes sense or not. They're essentially saying "Well, science can't prove it so there must be beyond scientific thinking..."
They said that if no one looks at a tape, it isn't observed. Which means that if you do the double slit experiment with a recorder, and immediately destroy the data it produces, you should get the marble-pattern in stead of a wave pattern, right?
This, this is where the beauty lies. I'm looking for something I saw, which details how after the double slit experiment was observed, a computer program had a 50% chance of deleting the recording at random, at which, the observations which where deleted resulted in the interference pattern instead of the double slit pattern.
It's confusing because they're trying to get you to believe things that are logically and scientifically impossible. The actual science behind quantum mechanics is difficult for anyone to grasp, but the topic of discussion is openly not hard science, but rather an overview of their version of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics, in a general sense, is NOT difficult to comprehend when not inundated by pseudoscience.
The video is takes a legitimate scientific concept - the Heisenberg uncertainty principle - and obscenely distorts into something it's not to provide basis for their fake "theory".
The uncertainty principle simply states that it is impossible to determine both the position and velocity of an electron or any other particle with any great degree of accuracy or certainty. That's it. You cant perfectly pinpoint where an electron is, and say exactly what it's doing.
With a basic comprehension of quantum mechanics, this principle should not be surprising in the least, taking into consideration that 1.) particles are smaller than the human mind can comprehend, and 2.) particles move at the speed of light.
Put these two facts together, and it should become clear why it is physically impossible to pinpoint the precise location of an electron.
Who cares anyway. What is true is true. Let em have their fun. If it's bullshit then it will one day be shown to be exactly that. Just like virgin births.
This is where "science" is right now. The problem is that they are trying to explain something they nor I completely understand but we can demonstrate the phenomena in a lab.
so lets relate this to the human mind. thoughts in the mind are nothing but the same particle in different places in the universe. thought is to particle as mind is to universe.
Even if this film is full of its share of B.S. I would expect we are only scratching the surface here. We might even find the world isn't flat, though this would be quite ridiculous.
Famous nobel winning Physicist John Wheeler had this to say "The quantum process has nothing to do with counciousness." When physicists use the word "OBSERVER" they are refering to a non counsciess "MEASURING DEVICE" that collides photons against electrons. The collision destroys the exterior waves leaving only the stronger interior waves intact a particle is just the inside uncollapsble strong wave. Way to manipulate/batardize terminology to mean something else completly for your agenda.
thenewdeal38 3 months ago
@darkstar1987lx what? that is rubbish. Stuff like that isn't alive that has a process of thought. That would mean we have found 'life' in outer space. a single electron doesnt have any processes for it to "see" and visualise and change it's actions. Absolute rubbish.
jeremyrules7 3 months ago
the marital status of the number 5. best question EVER.
TheBoxOfAwesome 3 months ago
lol at the black kid pretending to be smart and having a hint of nervousness in his memorised recital.
TBH how can an observing microscope placed next to the double slit experiment effect the result? ie , if you take the observing device away how does that change it? HOW can an electron be 'self-aware' and change it's behavior ??? like it is trolling? i dont get it?
jeremyrules7 3 months ago
@jeremyrules7 Electron is energy, you are energy, your whole body is energy at a high rate of vibration, and if you (wich is energy) can think, then the electron (wich is energy as well) can most possibly think too!
Don't think humans are the only things in the universe with a mind to make decisions and choices, pretty much EVERYTHING is alive...
darkstar1987lx 3 months ago
so we make realities when we are not observing one.when we do we cant percieve the others.Why is that?Could it be that in every choise we have to make,we create different paralele realities,that we have chosen other reallities?
KyrPadelhSkupidi 4 months ago
nature is fucking with us
LidLOL 5 months ago
Why aren't my car keys ever where I think they are?
HM?
IF THEY ARE EVERYWHERE? lmao
sonicmandx12 6 months ago
Interesting video! I am an artist on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time
This theory is based on just two simple postulates
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event
nickharvey7 6 months ago
I'm wondering,,,if a bear poops in the woods,, and there is no one there to step in it,, is the pope still catholic?
ED4action 7 months ago
@ED4action Dunnno, it depends on whether or not the tree made any sound when it fell, and the pope would be a Jew either way. WELCOME TO QUANTUM PHYSICS
Rileyman2rr 6 months ago
They have it wrong, things don't just "snap" into place when we see them, our BRAIN is just collecting the information, formulating it, and then relaying to our eyes which then goes back into the brain.
This isn't a PHYSICAL thing, it's just how vision works really.
miashalala 8 months ago
To me, number 6 is married to 9.
97kevinhuanle 8 months ago 6
@97kevinhuanle Um, when did he dump 7? Btw I also heard 2 was "interested" in 9. LOL great comment though!
aaqucnaona94 3 months ago
It keeps me puzzled.... where do I start to create what in my life? If I am the observer and at the same time the creator.............
jcs12865 8 months ago
@jcs12865 both, neither, one or the other, but all four options at the same time.
Rileyman2rr 6 months ago
@Rileyman2rr Sometimes I can "touch" what you say, but I am still standing in the way....
jcs12865 6 months ago
One word "Sudo-Science" bring me the evidence and equations and ill believe ! This is wishful thinking
cupwnd 9 months ago
@cupwnd I agree that this movie skews facts for an agenda (the rhetoric is pretty transparent). What i do like is that they present the facts clear enough for most people to understand. Therefore, if the viewer is versed well in rhetoric and picking apart fact from fiction, this is a pretty informative work on the basic workings of some theories of quantum physics. The next step that the viewer must take is go beyond this movie and do their own research to better understand these concepts.
arashinight 9 months ago
@arashinight Did you watch my video response? Please subscribe...
cupwnd 9 months ago
@cupwnd I just watched it. You're pretty much saying what I was thinking as I watched it. Certain experiments they used out of context and I hate the whole metaphysical spin on it (and I'm a practitioner of witchcraft, figure that one out). I had an English lit class in high school that was nothing but teaching how rhetoric and bias works so that we could pick apart things like that. They're using true facets of quantum physics (I confirmed them first) to support that agenda and that's wrong
arashinight 9 months ago
This video is what gave me a gestalt (revelation) of the Trinity. The three in One. The Godhead. Totally believable in Particle theory. I saw this two years ago and cried.
magickitchen54 10 months ago
in theory this means that when you're seeing double it could actually be the real thing.
MegaMollymollymolly 10 months ago
This + Acid = Lemon frosting
geragna 11 months ago
OHK
XXDJxJ03XX 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wouldnt u feel it in another place even if u cant see it
XXDJxJ03XX 11 months ago
wouldnt u feel it in another place even if u cant see it
XXDJxJ03XX 11 months ago
@XXDJxJ03XX Well you can't really feel an electron. Remember, superposition applies to sub-atomic particles, and, for example, a basketball is already made up of definite, single location particles. Furthermore, I don't like the idea that the observer in fact collapses the wave function. I prefer that instead the reaction required to observe (a photon bounces off of something and carries its information into your eye) collapses it.
TehAl3X 11 months ago 7
@TehAl3X OHK
XXDJxJ03XX 11 months ago
@TehAl3X Why would the particle give a shit you are observing it. IT doesn't make sense that we would see anything at all. If its existence is in many places, it makes sense that we either see that or we are unable to perceive it. Why would it be recorded that it clicks into one place for our observation?
quitejaded 6 months ago
@quitejaded It doesn't, but it's not like when you observe something, you're seeing it. You're seeing information carried by photons.
TehAl3X 6 months ago
@TehAl3X So why is it RECORDED as being in ONE place instead of many places?
quitejaded 6 months ago
@TehAl3X The photon hitting it and going to your eye isn't what collapses it though. Hitting something with a photon isn't going to make it stop acting as a wave now is it.
MrNathanCJMartin 5 months ago in playlist what the bleep do we know
@MrNathanCJMartin yes
TehAl3X 5 months ago
@TehAl3X The truth is that we have no idea whatsoever what happens to collapse the wave function of the electrons. Your speculation that a photon and I paraphrase "bouncing" off the electrons would have that effect, is just that, speculation.
MrNathanCJMartin 5 months ago
@XXDJxJ03XX OHK
XXDJxJ03XX 11 months ago
if what we believed came true then why do things surprise us? I think consciousness might play a roll in changing the way electrons behave, but I don't think we should jump to crazy conclusions just yet lol
braveheart2013 1 year ago
a good way to understand the concept of the same thing in different places is to think of yourself. picture yourself at 3 different locations in your home at the same time. not 3 of you, just one. anything you do, say, or think at one location, you must do, say, or think at the others because you are one being at all 3 locations.
mns1114 1 year ago
@mns1114 good way of explaining it.
SuperZubz 1 year ago
Comment removed
aaron8862006 1 year ago
@aaron8862006 but what if instead of this being right, math was just wrong? oh what a strange thought. the concept of math is a human based structure meaning it is susceptible to error. yet we are raised to believe that math is perfect. what if math is wrong? anyone ever thought of that? i am just messing around but still posing a serious question
CriMxDelAxCriM 1 year ago
Comment removed
aaron8862006 1 year ago
@aaron8862006 haha delude yourself, your already watching this video. have you done your research. this move was developed by a cult. and is highly criticized for its misrepresentation of quantum mechanics. yes quantum mechanics is scientific fact. but this move makes and an un scientifically founded jump into the physcological aspects of quantum mechanics. you can believe what ever you want. just do your research first:)
CriMxDelAxCriM 1 year ago
@aaron8862006
Your statement is circular logic. Math is not perfect because it is simply provably perfect. "Simply" is a term used to avoid having to prove a statement with evidence and simply negates all other factors that might prove the statement to be wrong. From your comment you basically just said "Math is perfect because we are told it is perfect".
GuitarNinja3000 1 year ago
Thank god we can't observe quantum phenomenon in everyday life...If we could the term common sense wouldn't exist :)
amiyaiitkgp 1 year ago
Wonder if they've tried to alter the perception of the observer - LSD for instance.
GK5225 1 year ago
What You expect, You get.
NassimHarameinVedas 1 year ago
pi
ashlandkiss 1 year ago
House of Leaves. That is all.
DMXP100 1 year ago
whoever is trying to give an explanation of this is not going to its impossible to explain this.
jaggerofgy 1 year ago
This is mind blowing for sure!! Think next time I'll stick with the blue pill, lol !!
Glendasmm 1 year ago
so that's why those specks, dents and marks seemed to move.. quite a few times.. into view, rather than just become noticed
Liiahmichelle8680 1 year ago
I luv Quantum Physics because it's so strange trying to get my head around it. But it's TRUE.
Paddyllfixit 1 year ago
Uhm, could you compare this to crossing your eyes? You cross your eyes while looking at a ball and you SEE two balls. You look at one wave function but you SEE 500. Is that a good way of explaining it?
einsteinplayssoccer1 1 year ago
THEORY:
when we do not observe an object, (look at it objectively) we see that the truth is that it is in many places at once, or possibly none at all,
but when we DO observe an object, we are in all the same places that it is, and none of the places it isnt, so we do not notice anything odd. We are all in many places, we are all in one place.
hit me up with your thoughts, please.
Steaksngainers 1 year ago 23
@Steaksngainers Just think about schrodinger's cat thought experiment and you will understand the point they are trying to present.
guitarf2 1 year ago
@Steaksngainers i think this is the entanglement theory, we are all connected somehow and thus this innate strangeness of being in all places at once and being in no place at all does not seem odd to us
dystopian786 11 months ago
@dystopian786 exactly. this is also relativity. :)
thanks for the comment, brother.
peace and love.
Steaksngainers 11 months ago
@Steaksngainers you're welcome brother
dystopian786 11 months ago
@Steaksngainers I like this. if the object is in all places then we too are in all places. but why do we perceive the singularity of ourselves and all objects rather than the simultaneous expression of them in all places? perhaps it is evolutionary, we evolved from an all sensing perspective into a line of expression from which we view everything as singular? i.e. perhaps our human senses have refined themselves over time to make sense of individual items rather than a sea of possibility?
aaaaaaaaaaandrew 10 months ago
@aaaaaaaaaaandrew hey bro, thanks for the comment, that's an interesting thought. We know our minds filter out a lot of useless information, maybe this is just one more thing. :)
SteaksnGainers was my old account, but I can't get back in because I can't link a Gmail account. This is my new channel, I'll send you a FR.
RoamingBo 10 months ago
@Steaksngainers :) We ourselves are the observer and observed. We are everything and everywhere and everyone all at once always and in all places because consciousness/fractality/light (all interchangeable) is what we are we. We are god. God is the first awakening of the One and contains all of the One. "God" as humans call it is and think of it in the metaphysical aspect is the primal essence and full awareness of the one in its own consciousness. We are god and we have the potential to become.
BellaLunaJessalynn 10 months ago 2
@Steaksngainers contd..... "God" as we move up in the scale frequency of the one hence becoming more fractal in our vantage point of consciousness hence becoming more aware of our eternal and infinite integration with everything that is the one. :)
BellaLunaJessalynn 10 months ago
@Steaksngainers Can you explain this theory to me as it relates to the Law of Attraction and how our thoughts and feelings shape our lives. Thanks in advance.
Annazayla 9 months ago
@Steaksngainers maybe this observer are the light particles we project onto the thing we observe so thats why the particles act differently because of the light.
MariaBoulevardez 8 months ago
@Steaksngainers @Steaksngainers maybe this observer is the light particles we project onto the thing we observe so thats why the particles act differently because of the light interfering
MariaBoulevardez 8 months ago
@Steaksngainers I'd hit you up if you made any sense. Saying the object is in many places at the same time is acceptable. Your conclusion is not... doesn't follow and I don't know what you mean.
quitejaded 6 months ago
@Steaksngainers I try to use it in my own life; why do I do what I do, what made my decision and how can I see what I couldn't see before, because my brain was trained in a different direction... and to tell you the truth I can feel the answer but when I try to grab it, it's gone....
As far as I can see we cannot see anything odd, because we cannot see what our brain doesn't recognize
jcs12865 6 months ago
@Steaksngainers Your point is valid and truthful. But the way i look at i, is that ; since we recieve information about the universe, and at the same time project that information, the matter of the fact is, we project what our subconscious mind expects!
If you expect to see a tree in front of you, then you will see it, if not, the same applies!
Just like with what we see, the same thing happens at tact level, if you expect something to be hard, then it will be, and so on, and so forth...
darkstar1987lx 3 months ago
just watch the damn video and appreciate QM for what it is. trying to mix philo with this is just silly.
weedee88 1 year ago
Is a way of understanding the 'separation' of particles to look at the particles as one whole but the connections are invisible?
impressionsbysimon 1 year ago
The main problem with these theories and ideas though, is that they're trying to apply a FACT that works on a micro level to a THEORY on a macro level. It may be true, but there's a lot of work to do. Quantum laws dictate on subatomic levels, and Newtonian laws dictate on the larger level. What they're trying to do is find the connection between them, and it's very hard, and possibly impossible.
nathaneatworld 1 year ago
i love this. But i'd like everyone to kindly stop observing me, so that i can be everywhere, please! i wonder what would happen if everyperson on the planet meditated into a "not observing" state all at once! cool, perhaps then a revolution would happen...
naomiharding 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
winterflower40 1 year ago
I'm so confused!! And all I want to do is Learn more!!
cinny1981 1 year ago
the guy at the beginning of this video is fucking annoying
dirt232323 1 year ago
im confused. if a particle is in 2 places at once when you look at it shouldnt you only see one not see the same particle in two places because it decides to go to one place?
023132 1 year ago 2
@023132 You are confused heh. When the electron is observed, then it becomes a single particle and goes through one or the other slits. When NOT observed, it exists in many locations at once as a wave. The act of observation changes the behaviour.
Ragnarok187 1 year ago
@Ragnarok187 ya i get that its just the guy said he could see 2 of the same particle in different places. but he observed it so shouldnt it go into one place not stay in 2 places because hes looking at it
023132 1 year ago
all of these discoveries in physics and still no back to the future hoverboard.
actionjessie 1 year ago
....is this even a real science documentary...?
Ashadow700 1 year ago
@Ashadow700
No, its not a real science documentary. There are certain elements of it which are scientifically sound, but then they use that to twist other things around, and contort your thinking to achieve their goals. The goal is to attempt to confuse viewers into believing that there is a tie between quantum physics and spirituality.
JVIPER88 1 year ago
@JVIPER88 Ah, I see.
You'd figure that they would try to take a slightly more subtle approach then this if that was what they were aiming for
Ashadow700 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
have u ever heard a rapper take his music as far as the universe listen to my song called off earth i guarantee its like nothin u ever heard before just go to my page
ThaUnknownUniverse 1 year ago
please.. do not take these weirdos word for what they are saying!.. I am not on about the interviewees, im on about the new age makers... they have cut & cooked the interviews here to make it look like the they are agreeing with the producers:)))
C'MON GUYS, DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK & DOUBLE CHECK WHAT THEY ARE SAYING!!!... EVEN EMAIL THE PPL BEEN INTERVIEWED & THEY WILL TELL YA THE SAME THING... I AM TELLING YOU THIS CAUSE THEY TOLD ME THIS.. WaKe ThE fUcK uP............ReSpEcT & LoVe To AlL:))
Eirexeyes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Eirexeyes have u ever heard a rapper take his music as far as the universe listen to my song called off earth i guarantee its like nothin u ever heard before just go to my page
ThaUnknownUniverse 1 year ago
@Eirexeyes I sir was interviewed for this piece and i have always stood behind its message and ive never emailed you either you lying son of a bitch
thegoods420 1 year ago
@thegoods420 umm, who the fuck are you!??... from your reply .. i know now that you are a lier & was never interviewed by these loonies.. you are a pleb!
Eirexeyes 1 year ago
@Eirexeyes
And how do you know that?
DelanoFilms 1 year ago
@Eirexeyes your whole statement is balderdash sir complete balderdash
thegoods420 1 year ago
This is all well and good but.... fuckin magnets how do they work?
xPeeWee93x 1 year ago
looks like the main question is who is it that is the obseviour of the senses i think this all pionts to the world being subjective and some people have realized this a long time ago like the religons, i think the main diffrence is that sience wants to contol the reality religion wants just to no how it is happening like (who am i) am i actualy this person or is this person subjective to me is this world subjective like a dream
nameboyd 1 year ago
Triangulation? The fact that we have (unless deaf or blind or such) five senses? Mean anything to anyone. The reason why more than one witness is required to confirm & judge the accuracy of prophecy? Purposeful?
sthnwatch 1 year ago
if gravity is not a real force but just a fucking particle like the other ones, does it means i can fly if i want to ?
zecle 1 year ago
@zecle I think yer going too far down the **shole. Jk. I'm kidding.
coterieternal 1 year ago
The matrix- part 2
swu880 1 year ago
im just like the slit experiment.whem im alone im all over minds thinking about a million things im a lunatic.then when someone asks''what are you doing,i freeze''words can not express my random persolality.i only give them what they want so they stop asking.
ninjafretshadow 1 year ago
omg! i went too far down the rabbit hole
l6ST11 1 year ago
Trinity in Unity: The Bible describes this about God.
coterieternal 1 year ago
The Bible is amazing on how it describes all of these concepts--long before science.
coterieternal 1 year ago
God confuses those who are wise. 8^ )
coterieternal 1 year ago
this has alot of metaphysics disguised has physics no?
selraith123 1 year ago
@selraith123
three words...
Double Slit Experiment....
NOT metaphysics ;)
theTOOLshed1 1 year ago
@theTOOLshed1 yes, but a lot of other parts of the video are somewhat doubtful
selraith123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT something bad will happen. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS ACTUALLY WORKS
Dukeian2014 1 year ago
FYI: this is just bull****. You can't apply quantum mechanics on a macro scale.
Gymmarn 1 year ago
maybe there would not be so many paradoxes if we assume that our universes' wave function has already collapsed during the big bang. This could mean that all events that have and will occur were already pre-determined at the big bang.
infinitenight2093 1 year ago
dont slam stuff
co0lerthanu 1 year ago
people be open to this. i am catholic... and i am not shutting my mind to this. religions are not anti science. unless you have proof....
co0lerthanu 1 year ago
Love it. ... . Tory from Austin Texas. Singer songwriter musician. Check out my originals and subscribe if you like. Please listen to my own original This one was inspired by the Movie What the Bleep do we Know? . Namaste
torytompkins 1 year ago
What about the birth? Is it also an illusion?..Sperms?....I think they are just predicting for now...It is not a subject that calculations or numbers can solve cause i believe that a human conciousness can create endless combinations of formulas to reach different resolutions. ( as they also mention)...But i still wonder how they can explain the reproduction in this way..
zarranger 1 year ago
HOLY FUCKIN SHIT! Unfortunately beyond full comprehension for me at this point
lawfulcitizen 1 year ago
Some of that is scientific bull crap.
chris7777777777777 1 year ago
i understand the latter part of the video that he was trying to describe, its interesting stuff
tenore85 1 year ago
When you try to comprehend this, its alot like the movie Next with Nicholas Cage, where when hes choosing his future, he is going through many possibility's at the same time. interesting.
thaWizardofAuz 1 year ago
@thaWizardofAuz
Watching these so far reminded me of a quote from that movie. It went something along these lines,
"Here is the thing about the future. Every time you look at, it changes, because you looked at it, and that changes everything else."
DearestyouXII 1 year ago
in its simplist form its the law off attraction everything is connected and attrcted to the other through thought and thought is energy
crazyinnocence2010 1 year ago
I agree 100%! I had just watched "The Secret" this morning.
Tryinitonmyown 1 year ago
@Tryinitonmyown yep¡ i watched it too ages ago and ever since then ive just been finding more and more things that proove it.. and it really does work 100%
crazyinnocence2010 1 year ago
"This is not sceince."
Then I suggest you throw away all the DVD players, satelites and barcode scanners in the world because they are all based on quantum mechanics.
anonimystro12345 1 year ago 21
My brain just died. :O
M60B4008 1 year ago 2
@anonimystro12345 @malonde Quantum physics is a legitimate field of study. However, this 'film' portrays it very poorly, they are trying to turn quantum mechanics into some sort of spiritual "all of reality is just thought" crap. it is very difficult for laypeople to differentiate where the quantum mechanics stops and quantum bullshit begins. This movie is largely pseudoscience. i think anonimystro, you are one of these people who failed to make the distinction between science and bullshit.
geilman 1 year ago
@geilman I didn't mean that.
Most of this movie, especially what comes after part 4 and 5 is bullshit, but some of it is actual science.
anonimystro12345 1 year ago
@anonimystro12345 of course some of it is science. But i think that people who don't already know things about quantum mechanics might be mislead entirely by this film. like the ball bouncing. it retains the principles but is exaggerated (quantum wave function collapse is not a large scale thing, the ball isn't everywhere when we are not looking, which im sure you know) combining this exaggeration of quantum mechanics mixed with this mysticism its shit. the very beginning is alright though.
geilman 1 year ago
@anonimystro12345 I kinda know how the thing were the something in more dan 1 place works and there wrong it is in one place cause if u touch your just gona feal it in one place I know because I have a trick I devoleped as a kid were if I try to see with each eye individualy on a certain object I can get 2 or more Images or words for now i can only do it with littles thing but If i touch it Ill only feal 1 thing in the original place remember da eyes out of all senses is da most easy to fool
TinyTitian 1 year ago
I call BS on that the quantum world is way smaller than DVD players, satellites and bar-codes. DVD are based on scratches on the disc that a laser reflects off of and understands what each scratch means...... bar codes are just read but the pattern of lines on them..... and satellites well depends what kind of satellite... but they don't use quantum physics
FlyainHawaiin 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is not science.
exenter2 2 years ago
you are daft and don't really now much do you?
Dakoo89 2 years ago
this is Amazing!
1175aqua 2 years ago 4
Can anyone explain to me why some on here are saying this is a cult video or something?
Colt2571 2 years ago
ignorance :]
vredeye01 2 years ago
because it's just too weird to grasp it as being plausible, if you have a little bit to do with this you know it's not just some stupid storieds ,it's just presented like this to be easier to grasp by any person out there.
Dakoo89 2 years ago
because MOST people are imbeciles.
damnedboner 1 year ago 2
Search Ramtha on google they made this movie.
ttc99wilson 1 year ago
i love science
that kid pownes!
carlosrperez1 2 years ago
When this knowledge is refined we that can understand it will move past this world.
This will move fast tune in or drop out.
CosmosPrivateer 2 years ago
What a thrilling film
skeletonmansion 2 years ago
You know to browse through here and see all the thumbs up for the people discounting this video, I'd like to be pointed in a direction where the principles in this video are proved wrong. People puffing out their chests and saying "Wrong!", and not explaining why seems sort of counter productive. It's only theory after all.
malonde 2 years ago 43
I totally agree, just like when they refute global climate change.... How about some evidence that it isn't occurring?
Jozsus 2 years ago
@malonde
You sir are fail "It's only theory after all.". Try to read up on what a scientific theory really is before you write.
They don't need to discount this video because it's up to them to via measurments discount their theory.
So, for you info, this video is just bull****. They try to explain quantum mechanics on a macro scale.. unh?
Gymmarn 1 year ago
@Gymmarn I'm fail?! You just proved my point. Way to go Einstein. "They try to explain quantum mechanics on a macro scale" to discount an entire documentary as dung. Wow. Should have just hired you to do the documentary. You could have said "Pff... bullcrap", and it'd be over. Surprised you made it to PART 5 actually. I would have thought you would have seen the first ten minutes and written youtube to take it down or something. But nah, you're right. I'm fail. I'm fail at understanding people.
malonde 1 year ago
@malonde
That was beautiful XD you're jokes...
AND I agree completely with you :)
theTOOLshed1 1 year ago
@Gymmarn actually the goal of this video is to demonstrate how the underlying quantum interacts with macro and has some effect in the macro world. see the difference? demonstrating how at different levels, radically different rules apply
blystyryng 1 year ago
@malonde, the problem is that this kind of theory involves some pretty radical changes in perception, which goes into metaphysics and things that aren't directly related to science. However, I think the ideas being discussed here are extremely interesting and I think there may one day be a way to prove or test these theories.
CodyRicheson 1 year ago
@malonde I don't know that it is wrong, but rather that it is irrelevant. Firstly we haven't evolved the sensory mechanisms to take advantage of these potentials.... secondly if you actually lived your life thinking about this stuff day to day you would end up being committed.
grim0033 1 year ago
@malonde Anything that threatens what they have been programed to beileve must be wrong. They are of the same mentality as people back when the when the Sun was believed to revovle around the Earth that persecuted or ridculed those who said otherwise. Everything that doesn't support the programming "does not compute" therefore it must be a lie. Yes, after all this is just theory.
redneck123000 1 year ago
@malonde
Quantum mechanics IS NOT just a theory malonde, its a fact. In fact QM is one of the most experimentally proven laws of physics.
bachelor2009 1 year ago
@bachelor2009 Who says you can't theorize off of fact? It's done all the time. To think that we know all there is to know, and there is nothing else is very, very arrogant. I'm just saying ...
malonde 1 year ago
@malonde Things have to be proven right, that's the problem with both this documentary and religion. We can make theories about anything, but the only way we can make any sense of it is by only believing in the theories which have been proven to be accurate. For example, the things observed in quantum mechanics were observed and thus hold some truth to them, but trying to explain why and how they work is be purely theoretical and thus not yet scientific or factual for that matter.
tiekoe 1 year ago
@malonde Theory is all we really have
gezkah 1 year ago
Comment removed
dsbnh 1 year ago
@malonde The reason why we don't just accept it as a theory is because in science theories require more than just "Here's what I think..." They require an explanation of how one at arrived at that answer which makes sense according to what we know. If you cannot provide an answer to said question, because we know too little, then it is best to admit that and wait until we know more. You shouldn't commend them for trying because they really aren't trying.
dsbnh 1 year ago
@malonde I know on the surface it looks bad to be so negative and shut down opposing ideas. However, as we learn early on in school, one must be able to show one's work. It is fine to have a hypotheses, but in order for it to be a theory you must show your work. You don't have to prove it, but you have to show how you arrived at said conclusion. Merely presenting a mystery, mentioning it is unexplained, and then suggesting it must be beyond us is not good enough.
dsbnh 1 year ago
The problem is that a lot of the conclusions people reach in these videos are essentially unfalsifiable. They arrived at these conclusions through no scientific means and are completely wild-haired theories made up in order to provide an "answer" to things we don't know regardless of whether how they arrived at said conclusion makes sense or not. They're essentially saying "Well, science can't prove it so there must be beyond scientific thinking..."
dsbnh 1 year ago
wtf ahhhhhhhh....
cagsd 2 years ago
They said that if no one looks at a tape, it isn't observed. Which means that if you do the double slit experiment with a recorder, and immediately destroy the data it produces, you should get the marble-pattern in stead of a wave pattern, right?
Thunderios 2 years ago
This, this is where the beauty lies. I'm looking for something I saw, which details how after the double slit experiment was observed, a computer program had a 50% chance of deleting the recording at random, at which, the observations which where deleted resulted in the interference pattern instead of the double slit pattern.
Kitsune557 2 years ago 2
That's cool! Thanks for telling me (and everybody else)!
Thunderios 2 years ago
I like it how he quadrupled the Laplace operator at 1:36.
Germanymous 2 years ago
I am having trouble getting through these videos
dondrinkman 2 years ago
that might be because these "scientists" are full of shit
avp715 2 years ago
We shall see. I'm sure their ideas will be tested to destruction. Time will tell what is true and what is shit.
You get that when you try and make sense of things you have yet to fully understand.Too much woo...... here at present.
dondrinkman 2 years ago
It's confusing because they're trying to get you to believe things that are logically and scientifically impossible. The actual science behind quantum mechanics is difficult for anyone to grasp, but the topic of discussion is openly not hard science, but rather an overview of their version of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics, in a general sense, is NOT difficult to comprehend when not inundated by pseudoscience.
avp715 2 years ago
The video is takes a legitimate scientific concept - the Heisenberg uncertainty principle - and obscenely distorts into something it's not to provide basis for their fake "theory".
The uncertainty principle simply states that it is impossible to determine both the position and velocity of an electron or any other particle with any great degree of accuracy or certainty. That's it. You cant perfectly pinpoint where an electron is, and say exactly what it's doing.
avp715 2 years ago 3
With a basic comprehension of quantum mechanics, this principle should not be surprising in the least, taking into consideration that 1.) particles are smaller than the human mind can comprehend, and 2.) particles move at the speed of light.
Put these two facts together, and it should become clear why it is physically impossible to pinpoint the precise location of an electron.
avp715 2 years ago 3
Who cares anyway. What is true is true. Let em have their fun. If it's bullshit then it will one day be shown to be exactly that. Just like virgin births.
dondrinkman 2 years ago
I see your point but how can you explain the part where the particles change direction when the is a witness in the two slit expeirment
BrandenBRiddick 2 years ago
are you a chistain
smrterthenu 2 years ago
This is where "science" is right now. The problem is that they are trying to explain something they nor I completely understand but we can demonstrate the phenomena in a lab.
TheGrowdaddy 2 years ago
so lets relate this to the human mind. thoughts in the mind are nothing but the same particle in different places in the universe. thought is to particle as mind is to universe.
matticusmatterson 2 years ago
Truth is our potentials are endless.
Even if this film is full of its share of B.S. I would expect we are only scratching the surface here. We might even find the world isn't flat, though this would be quite ridiculous.
timmyzeus 2 years ago 2
so... are we on 1 dimension or in an infinite dimension, possibilities are endless
myght has well grow a crazy hair and formulate the awesome reality of a nuclear bomb, just like Einstein xD
DDeafth 2 years ago 2
wow none of these faggots are scientists...
gotta love the meaningless bullshit equations on the chalkboard
avp715 2 years ago
lol
jcborja 2 years ago
lololololol
the stream of bullshit starts to really flow at 1:04
avp715 2 years ago