Added: 11 months ago
From: dokosa1
Views: 86,000
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • By minute 14 raising the loader arm all the way up would have helped counter the rear ballast. GOtta love winches!

  • you guys really had no clue as to what you were doing did you ? thank God he watched over you and it all ended up well.

  • Nice Video

  • YOu all had better stay down SOUTH and work you wouldnt make it in the gas fields in appalachain moutains , as for the wrecker service , the one big wrecker should have handled a 953 with no problem

  • dont agree with some of thier job performance but you gotta do what cha gotta do ive seen both of those trucks in action several times and that tracloader wasnt that big of a job for those trucks regardless of the terrain you dont play around with that ga red clay in a situation like that would hate to have seen the bill for that recovery

  • They are standing in the worst possible spot if they break a cable, it would cut them in half. They have no feet down on the tow truck and it could slide off the hill trying to bull out the dozer. Looks as if safety was not even looked at. Many things done wrong..

  • SPACECADET2U if you could lift the bucket without putting extra weight on the front and sinking it even more there is no way you would push the Traxcavator (that's what we call it in Aus) backward by curling the bucket against a bucket of mud not to mention the suction that would cause. Yes that excavator is way to small to get the traxcavator out of that hole. Rednecks? Only rednecks wouldn't use the right gear to get that out of there!

  • Rednecks are there Finest

  • It looks like county employees; apparently the excavator operator was just there to bill some time to somebody. When I first realized what the "plan" was; I was astonished and I had to watch the whole thing. I was taught that these equipments are called a "front loader" and an "excavator"; but there are probably other names in use. And yes, the track layer would be my first, )and only) choice to back out the front loader.

  • That was truly amazing. a. there wasn't any bulldozer involved in this video; b.the chain loop onthe tow fixture of the front loader was running at about 250% of it's safe load rating c.0nce again really good machinery that never should have been treated this way, saves really foolish people who never should have been at this job site.

  • bunch of muppets. i garuntee you that they could of gotten that trackloader out with the excavator in 1/2 the time.

  • guinchão loko hein,bem q eu queria dirigir um desses

  • hehehe,se não sai por bem sai por mal hein,rsrs

  • fuck,they should have brought the hoe up qand cut a slot/ramp out of the lip of the crest of tyhe hill gees

  • that is a track loader not a bulldozer and the track-hoe couldnt pull it out cause of the angle and it is to small

  • machinery and idiots don't mix!

  • At 9:38 why not just put the bucket down and curl back?! So many retarded things about this video I can't stand to watch anymore....hope you had to bury it in the "small pond".

  • why not take it out from below where the excavator is ?

  • I apologize a little bit that was not a 53. I need to look at the # and machine itself closer.

  • A53c does not weigh that. But why the wreckers? There's a good sized hoe there. But I wasn't there. But I do run more than 53c. Oh yeah I forgot a53c is a loader.  Where is the loader help?

  • A53c does not weigh that. But why the wreckers? There's a good sized hoe there. But I wasn't there. But I do run more than 53c.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more