Judge Andrew Napolitano Speech 1 of 3 at Ron Paul BBQ August 15 2009

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician wrote, [It doesn't matter if (the government is committing legalize armed robbery to support: dreams, schemes...) if it is because it is required for society to run.]

Ah yes the "social contract" that allows cowardly public stealing you so love?

Are you really that ignorant about the subject matter or are you lying? Remember my earlier words,

"Now I'm not talking about indirect taxes for roads & such."

So did you mention roads to deceive or you don't understand taxes?

[ifreemantoo]

BTW AndroidPolitician,

I asked a similar question to which you were unresponsive. Perhaps you will do better here.

So you advocate legal armed robbery to fund your dreams, schemes, swimming pool, house addition, new car, children's education, your food & water, wealth building, failures, bailouts & other legal and stupid mischief?

Just a yes or no will do.

[AndroidPolitician]

No because it's not robbery, the constitution explicitly states that the government can tax you.

If you don't want to be taxed you have to leave the US.

[ifreemantoo]

[No because it's not robbery, the constitution explicitly states that the government can tax you.]

You see I'm sure you've never read the Constitution or Declaration of Independence. How can that Constitution allow legalized stealing for dreams, schemes, wants, desires, bailouts, cash4clunkers, wealth building to take money from one to give to another when you can't do the same thing to your neighbor.

Now I'm not talking about indirect taxes for roads & such.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician,

I asked the following question.

So you advocate legal armed robbery to fund your dreams, schemes, swimming pool, house addition, new car, children's education, your food & water, wealth building, failures, bailouts & other legal and stupid mischief?

Your response: "No because it's not robbery, the constitution explicitly states that the government can tax you."

You really believe the forcing someone to pay for another's dreams, schemes... is not legalized armed robbery?

[AndroidPolitician]

It doesn't matter if it is, because it's required for society to run.

Or will the free market take care of roads, social security etc.?

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician wrote, [Or will the free market take care of...social security etc.?]

Now "social security" must of come right out of your communist manifesto. You know a chicken in every pot & car in every garage by public stealing. BTW aren't they talking about reducing SS benefits? LOL It's mostly used as a way to count the sheeple.

Your question is a joke! It should be, how did people allow such legalized mischief as SS? You probably don't have children, but you pass your debt to mine.

[AndroidPolitician]

Jesus christ it's really not worth my time to educate you.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician wrote, [Jesus christ it's really not worth my time to educate you.]

Are you a legal thief in training? Is that why your frustrated? From our discussion it seems I'm educating you.

You know whatever someone makes for their benefit, if it is no longer of benefit the Creator of such has every right to modify it or even destroy it.

BTW the fact is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence. Try reading it for yourself sometime.

Sound like I'm the "author & source of law. LOL

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician,

What do you think? Judge Andrew Napolitano writes this in his book CONSTITUTIONAL CHAOS,

'Because it breaks the law, the government is not your friend...after witnessing first-hand how the criminal justice system works to subvert and shred the Constitution. You think you have rights that are guaranteed? Well think again.'

'The government is simply stretching and twisting federal law & the Constitution in whatever way it sees fit for whatever contemporary need it may have.'

[AndroidPolitician]

"all taxes should be abolished period"

- Not the point of Napolitano's book

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician - [Not the point of Napolitano's book]

It takes a legal thief to make that kind of statement.

Napolitano wrote;

"You think you have rights that are guaranteed? Well think again.' -'The government is simply stretching and twisting federal law & the Constitution in whatever way it sees fit for whatever contemporary need it may have."

I see. So your saying that his words only apply to criminal law, but not to legalized stealing or other aspects of this present government? LOL

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician all taxes should be abolished period"

Where's that quote from? It's not in this video nor are those my words.

BTW Andrew Napolitano did say in this video.

"...and the only legitimate role of the government is to protect human freedom."

Do you disagree with this too? If you disagree, what is the "legitimate role of the government" if it is not to protect human freedom?

[AndroidPolitician]

This post perfectly illistrates that you want to live in a taxless state.

"It takes a legal thief to make this kind of statement" because it's in rebuttle to me saying that a taxless state is dumb.

Either you have aspergers and don't understand how saying that means your for it, or you just automaticlly assume people know despite your comments saying otherwise.

[ifreemantoo]

androidpolitician -[...you want to live in a taxlessstate &...you hold taxes with such hate ...]

Youre batting zero on your assumptions & 100% on errors & twisting my words. I don't want to live in your Cuba with your idea of taxes.

Public stealing by any name is still theft. Look at the pie chart in the back of your 1040 Instructions. It takes about 30% to run the government & military. The rest in another's idea of a society not Constituted for this land.

[ifreemantoo]

.androidPolitican -[.Either you have aspergers...]

You wrote that I signed a document making me subject to a social contract & you couldn't produce such. Then had a temper tantrum about it.

You can't read beyond your socialistic colored eye glasses.

You keep twisting my words to say something I don't say and I have "aspergers"?! Well then what's wrong with you? Are you just a legal thief with no medical excuse for advocating legalized stealing? LOL

You really like this kind of self-abuse?

[AndroidPolitician]

"You wrote that I signed a document"

bahahahahahaha holy shit. Like I really started laughing when I saw this.

Oh my god you really don't know what your talking about.

[ifreemantoo]

...AndroidPolitician. [...You wrote...I signed a document.]

YouTube video, "The Other Donald Duck Tax Propaganda Film" you did write these words.

[You signed a contract to enable this (the social contract) if you don't like it you can leave to some other country that has zero taxes.]

[AndroidPolitician]

bahaha yes because I clearly meant literally physically signed it. Yep.

Oh my god, do yourself a favor and google, "social contract", until then you're not even worth talking to.

[ifreemantoo]

"...because I clearly meant...physically signed it." (The spin)

Just like a legal thief to have his cake & eat it too. You have no problem twisting my words, but when I actually read yours well...you become upset.

I understand what you mean by "social contract" it make you feel good about public stealing. We've already been through this.

You must be really embarrassed getting your butt kicked by a "five year old". LOL

[AndroidPolitician]

you literally don't know what a social contract is or even what your talking about.

like if you even think that I've been arguing with you this whole time,

your dumber then I thought, because you don't even understand what your arguing.

[ifreemantoo]

Gee AndroidPolitician,

Is it your habit to argue with a dumb 5 year old? Ha ha ha. I thought our "social contract" was the Constitution (not of Cuba of course).

Under your elitist watch tower "social(ist) contract" do I have a self-evident right to reject paying for your dreams, schemes, wants, desires, pleasures, bailouts, cash4clunkers & other stupid stuff.

Personally I like Ron Paul myself.

I love your frustration. Man you know it don't bode well for you to argue with a 5 year old? LOL

[AndroidPolitician]

bahahahahahaha bahahahaha.

I'm saving this comment and sharing it with everyone holy shit.

[AndroidPolitician]

"Personally I like Ron Paul myself."

The guy who want's to give states the power to make abortion illegal?

Way to hate on freedom.

[ifreemantoo]

[The guy who want's to give states the power...l?]

Hey AndroidPolitician,

Answer my question then I'll explain to you why this statement is really stupid. Perhaps why you're somewhat brainwashed.

[AndroidPolitician]

I'm honestly not even sure you know the right answer.

In fact I'm appalled that you would reject the 16th amendment and still hold the constitution as the highest law of the land (I suppose this is what you think the answer is.)

Also you still didn't answer to what eminent domain is.

[ifreemantoo]

You have not answered all of my questions. Eminent Domain will have its place when you honestly answer my question.

What is your answer sir, plainly?

What are the documents or law of the land that grant or give people their freedom?

We're still waiting...

and waiting...

[AndroidPolitician]

I already answered you fucking retard. It's the constitution.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician answered the following question like most legal thief lawyers do.

"What are the documents or law of the land that grant or give people freedom?" His answer, [It's the Constitution.]

You blew it when you wrote the Bill of Rights. You just proved you've never understood the Constitution if you ever read it.

First off take a look at a dictionary to see what the word "grant" means. The Declaration of Independence reads, "We hold these truths to be self-evident

continued.

[ifreemantoo]

continued here.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

It is not documents or law that grant what people already own\. You've been brainwashed.

US Constitution reads, "We the People..." grant and give existence to the Constitution and law of the land. You've been brainwashed & can't read the self-evident.

[AndroidPolitician]

the Declaration of Independence has almost no legal backing with regards to how the US government is structured.

What's interesting is that you would hold the constitution as your supreme authority and completely ignore the 16th amendment, and like a guy who wants to eliminate the right of abortion.

You have some serious cognitive dissonance.

[ifreemantoo]

Judge Andrew Napolitano would "Constitutionally disagree with you regarding the Declaration of Independence.

However it is self-evident that liberty & freedom are not granted by words of paper when those words We The People granted existence to the Constitution & law of the land.

Where did I say that Constitution is my supreme authority? You're assuming again. That which creates is not subject to the mischief of its creature. You say as you do because you believe your rights come from people

[ifreemantoo]

I like how you use "legal backing" like you use "social contract". Just interchangeable terms to make you feel good about legalized stealing.

[AndroidPolitician]

I use the "legal backing" based on the "laws" written by the "constituion".

Congrats on being an idiot.

[ifreemantoo]

Are laws written by the Constitution? Is that what they mean by a living document? Its hard to take you seriously anymore.

Are you talking about the Constitution as Judge Napolitano refers to today?

'The government is simply stretching and twisting federal law & the Constitution in whatever way it sees fit for whatever contemporary need it may have.'

Like I wrote, legal thieves can always justify legal stealing.

You always have long discussions with idiot, retarded 5 year olds? How mature.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician wrote, [You have some serious cognitive dissonance]

Really?!!! What do you call that you believed that the Constitution and Bill of Rights GRANTED you what you previously owned: Liberty & Freedom.

One of your friends wrote this.

AndroidPolitician, "I would like have a battle of wits with you, but you appear to be unarmed "

[AndroidPolitician]

It granted America those rights and therefore by extension me.

oh cool some random quote.

What ever I've had enough of me owning you.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician wrote, [It (Constitution & Bill of Rights] granted those rights and therefore by extension me.]

Talk about laughable & cognitive dissonance! People granted existence to the Constitution & Bill of Rights to clarify what was self-evident & now somehow these documents GRANT you what you had before any documents were written.

WOW you are brainwashed thoroughly. I imagine you can believe whatever you want.

The "whatever" statement of a loser.

[BeenSovereign]

@AndroidPolitician It? It being the constitution? If you think your rights are granted by a piece of paper you're misinformed. You're rights are granted by your Creator, whomever or whatever you say that Creator may be. The Constitution is more of a list of gov't rights and restrictions, both state and federal. You are endowed unalienable rights so long as you do not infringe upon another's life or liberty. Victimless crimes are at issue here.

[AndroidPolitician]

@BeenSovereign

Oh so then why didn't human beings respect rights for about 100,000 years and why do different countries have different numbers of rights?

Is it just the US that has the correct number of rights? Did the creator after 100k years of inactivity suddenly decide to allow people to observe those rights?

[BeenSovereign]

@AndroidPolitician Did I say it was the US? Furthermore did I say it was only the US? I'm not here to give you answers you want from God and I seriously doubt you're going to hear it in the wind anytime soon. True Laws came from God, that's where the foundation of law known as common law originates.

Why didn't people respect others rights, because they had the free will not to do so, just like the oppressed had the free will to fight back.

I wish you well in your quest for truth.

[AndroidPolitician]

@BeenSovereign

Alright lets step back for a second and look at your argument.

You're saying rights came from God, so which country has the correct number of rights God granted?

Did "god" want 10 rights, 15 rights, and which rights for that matter?

It's a non-argument and has been debunked by George Carlin a long time ago.

[AndroidPolitician]

Also you're required to pay the income tax under the 16th amendment of the constitution.

[ifreemantoo]

Well of course just as a robber makes a gun the requirement when stealing from me..

What do you know about anything in the Constitution? You just proved yourself inept regarding simple concepts of the self-evident.

In your world you create a Constitution as a legal means to do whatever you want to do & at the expense of your neighbor's self-evident rights of freedom and liberty. Once again you will use interpretation that justifies stealing. It would make no real difference what the words say.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician,

I'm feeling like I've been a little bit of a bully. So I'm gonna grant you a break if you can answer this question correctly; and a follow up if you should answer correctly.

What are the documents or law that grants or gives people upon this land their freedom and liberty?

[AndroidPolitician]

Lol you probably don't even know what eminent domain is.

[ifreemantoo]

Oh if you do I'll visit your "social contract" web-site.

BTW I think you're losing it. First you're talking to 5 year olds next you sound like a new born.

[AndroidPolitician]

"Oh if you do I'll visit your "social contract" web-site."

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAA HOLY SHIT

You still didn't even google it.

I hope you don't mind I compile this conversation and share it with other people because holy cow.

Like your literally too dumb to google something.

I've literally never met someone this dumb in my entire life.

[ifreemantoo]

WOW and you're still arguing with dumb 5 year olds. LOL

So I can presume or assume you don't know what the documents or law are that grant or give people freedom and liberty in this land?

[AndroidPolitician]

"WOW and you're still arguing with dumb 5 year olds. LOL"

........you just called yourself a five year old......

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician,

Yea I laughed when you wrote, [You signed a contract to enable this (the social contract)... & you were going to educate me. Lets see how you spin your stupidity. Perhaps youre suffering from aspergers or cant keep up with how you twist truth? So which is it?

[AndroidPolitician]

bahaha you're literally a five year old.

[ifreemantoo]

Here are some more facts you'll never hear from AndroidPolitician. Former Judge Andrew Napolitano wrote in his book CONSTITUTIONAL CHAOS, Because the government breaks the law and denies it, the government is not your friend. Content of Part 1 Rights and Liberties Chapters 1 Breaking the law to enforce it 2 Attacking the Innocent 3 Creating Crime 4 Grabbing Guns, Endangering Citizens 5 Filching Property 6 Gagging Free Speech 7 Bribing Witnesses, Buying Convictions 8 Assaulting the People

[311bmurr]

the only person on foxsnews i like!!

[julianhpike]

This man is the only reason I ever watch anything on Fox.

[phchartrand]

Ron's son, Rand is officially running for Senate in Kentucky. He's having a moneybomb on August 20th, the day of his father's birthday !

Pledge at runrandrun(.)com

[LiveFreeOrDieNow]

Judge is the man. Glad to see he is one 5 days a week starting in September.

[JohnQPublixx]

Marxists call themselves progressives these day and neocons embrace both!

[whittvet]

I was at the front table! Sorry, I just had to brag!

[leafwatch]

In less than 2 minutes, Judge Napolitano clarified

and explained an episode of American history - the stamp act -- far better than all my years of public education

[pierre1050]

That was one of the BEST SPEECHES EVER!! Amazing. Thank you judge!

In liberty!

P.

[troma333]

That truth is to deliver life from life. Deliver truth from truth. Those who call a lie the truth do so intently to deceive and to harm and they know in truth that they are liars. Truth is in the intent to love the goodness in truth. Truth is in the intent in being honest with one another no matter if the facts are false for science as we know it would not exist if it was not for honest mistakes.

Those who intentionally lie have harmed this World and our species for far too long.

[troma333]

Go Judge! GOD is infinite and we are all within it no matter the words we use to create our views. We must unite knowing that the miracles are everywhere. Growing, knowing, seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling, and feeling. Are not these things miracles onto themselves? When a scab heals is this not proof enough of ?something? beyond our means to comprehend fully? It is not by coincidence that euphoria exists at the moment of conception for this is proof alone of the intent and proof of life.

[MikeHansonArchives]

There is a link to Part 2 right under the subscribe button.

[KARStarla]

I cant find part 2 or 3 can someone assist me on that?

[reaglevideo]

2

watch?v=3D5LxdmSBj4

3

watch?v=zEUJdf3dwHQ

[KARStarla]

Thank you so much! Your the best! :)

[KARStarla]

I love this guy

Hey guys Google

March on Washington Scheduled for September 12, 2009

Woohoo!

[Time4SomeTruth]

Got NO problem with Freedom.

Big problem with fox news. They are the chicken neck war pigs that brought you the war in Iraq.

Just in case you already forgot.

[Jilly1965]

An Iranian was arguing online with some liberals and finally the Iranian said..."We were taught to hate George Bush but he freed the Iraqis. Who will be our George Bush?"

Obviously no one...they're having mass trials of the protesters now - the ones who are still alive. And soon they'll have the bomb. We'll be lucky to not regret it.

[delquattro]

Yeah, you Marxists hate the fact that conservatives finally get a voice on television. As for the war, name one Democrat who called for a vote on Ron Paul's constitutional declaration of war?

[AndroidPolitician]

"Yeah, you Marxists hate the fact that conservatives finally get a voice on television."

Because Fox News gets no ratings what so ever apparently.

[delquattro]

You're thinking (I know, that's a stretch) of MSNBC. Fox News, which gives the liberal perspective along with the conservative view, is catching up with network ratings. They've owned the cable ratings for years.

[AndroidPolitician]

"Fox News, which gives the liberal perspective along with the conservative view"

Is there a difference between view and perspective? And how the hell is Fox giving the "liberal" perspective, does it need shows devoted to white power and Ayn Rand to be conservative or something?

[delquattro]

It's not that complicated, you should be able to keep up...Fox has guests on that discuss issues from the liberal and conservative (or, at least moderate) perspective. Unlike CNNMSNBCABCNPRCBS who actively promote the leftist agenda when reporting stories and interviewing guests. Maybe that is why Fox News has a huge liberal demographic tuning in?

[AndroidPolitician]

You do realize Fox has Karl Rove as a senior Fox News political analyst right? Or that Fox News's president is Roger Ailes? So do Bill O'rielly, Hannity, and Glenn Beck promote a liberal agenda?

Do you even know what the word liberal means?

No Fox news has a huge liberal demographic because it gets liberals angry to see rightwing propaganda marketed as "news".

Hell even Rush Limbaugh has a huge liberal demographic for the same reason.

[delquattro]

Reading comprehension may be your problem. I never said that Fox promotes the liberal agenda. I said they give them a chance to BS their viewers. CNNMSNBCABCNPRCBS are dedicated to BS'ing their viewers by promoting the liberal premise when reporting news. They may have one conservative on with three hysterical liberals filibustering the segment.

[delquattro]

Did you notice Dan Rather, of CBS, got fired for reporting a false story about Bush? Tim Russert, Chris Matthews and George Stepanieopolis all used to be Democrat staff members. Then you have GE, the owner of NBCMSNBC, who is looking for sweetheart deals from Cap & Tax. CNN is as bad as the NYT for fabricating stories, too.

All of these FACTS are part of the reason why Fox trounces all of cable news combined and is catching up with network ratings. That and they have the best looking babes.

[AndroidPolitician]

So what do you have to say to the FACT that the president of Fox News, Roger Ailes was also the media consultant for Nixon, Bush sr. and Reagan. I doubt that makes Fox objective.

[delquattro]

I say that it doesn't matter because his news network still gives a microphone to Marxist liberals.

[AndroidPolitician]

I'm really curious as to what freaky definition you have to the world "liberal".

[AndroidPolitician]

Literally all News outlets are controlled by giant conglomerates.

Seeing as how liberals hate large corporations I doubt CNN can run liberal stories bashing TimeWarner or MSNBC bashing GE for giving people cancer.

Or do you not know what the word liberal means?

[delquattro]

I agree that corporatism (or fascism, if you prefer) is the cause of most of our nations problems. I cant make sense of the rest of your comment.

In todays context, liberal means Marxist, whether you, or they are willing to admit it. It used to refer to the interpretation of the constitution as a living document. Conservatives want to interpret the constitution as it was written. Neo-cons are Trotskyites liberals who believe the constitution is anachronistic.

[AndroidPolitician]

"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times." - Thomas Jefferson, apparent "marxist".

[delquattro]

The founding fathers provided a method for doing exactly as TJ describes. Marxist find that process tiresome...they would rather just eliminate it instead of having to buy off politicians as they do now. Liberals try to re-interpret the constitution through the courts because they can't sway the people to do it through the appropriate means - congress.

[AndroidPolitician]

Are you talking about abortion or something? What exactly have liberals "re-interpreted".

[AndroidPolitician]

News corporations controlling news isn't "corporatism" it is the free market, the very thing we enjoy.

In the sense that the constitution was designed to accept amendments, it is technically a "living document".

A liberal is someone who advocates low social control (wants to get rid of patriot act etc.) but is economically left (wants to keep companies from abusing people and end NAFTA etc.).

Hell a good example of a liberal is Dennis Kucinich someone Ron Paul loves.

[AndroidPolitician]

Also since when has Fox News had "liberals" on their shows period. I mean jesus christ Colmes is a moderately right centrist.

[delquattro]

For you to call Alan Colmes a moderate right centrist shows how extremely Marxist you are. Besides, in our discussion I have repeatedly referred to the equal time given to BOTH views.

[AndroidPolitician]

Fox News gives equal time to liberals?

Jesus fuck you probably have like what? A highschool education at best?

[delquattro]

I didn't mind trying to educate you because you're probably just a victim of our socialist education system, but your vulgarity tells me I am wasting my time with someone already stretched beyond the limits of their intellectual capacity.

[AndroidPolitician]

You literally don't have any idea what your talking about at all.

In fact if you did you'd know Ron Paul is authoritarian compared to some like Dennis Kucinich, a lefty liberal.

In fact I'd urge you to study this carefully because you don't know what your talking about.

politicalcompass[dot]org/usele­ction2008

Ironically you'd probably come off as authoritarian in the test.

[AndroidPolitician]

Also can you answer you earlier statement that liberals "re-interpret" the constitution and what exactly they "re-interpret"?

[jerdeb4evr]

It means they want it to say what they want it to say. They don't want to be bothered by trivial things such as facts, written in black ink on paper. Like you they are so accustomed to believing so much that isn't so. You begin every argument as though you are somehow above everybody else. I got news for you, do not look down, you are only held up by imagination. Further, we all see your gas bubble

[AndroidPolitician]

What exactly do liberals "want the constitution to say" that goes so fiercely against it?

Like seriously stop beating around bush and articulate on this evil unconstitutional plot liberals have in mind.

[jerdeb4evr]

the liberal agenda is all around you android. I trust you are smart enough to identify it, if not how about one the Constitution side we have limited government, expressly restrained to military, interstate commerce. On the liberal agenda side we have massive government, government ownership of business, control of energy, agriculture, transportation, and cornering the market on contrary princes and princesses whom believe strong is bad.

[AndroidPolitician]

Are you kidding me? Liberals want to slash the military like crazy and no liberal wants government control of anything they simply want regulations to offset things like pollution and financial issues.

Seriously by your logic the Clean Water act and Meat Inspection act are unconstitutional.

[AndroidPolitician]

also the fact that Napolitano (and most libertarians I know) calls him a "pro-life libertarian" is pretty self contradictory.

[jerdeb4evr]

And what is for which you stand. It is easy to sit back and sharpshoot others ideas, what have you got to offer.

[AndroidPolitician]

Well pretty "liberal" ideas.

Single-payer healthcare with private insurance option, legalize same-sex marriage, legalize and tax/regulate marijuana, cut the military budget by a lot, end the patriot act/FISA and put regulations for companies receiving tax-payer subsidies.

[southron1961]

You gotta be kidding

[AndroidPolitician]

You literally can't not agree on everything but single payer, espeically if you call yourself a "libertarian"

[ifreemantoo]

[Also can you answer you earlier statement that liberals "re-interpret" the constitution and what exactly they "re-interpret"?]

Interesting in a brief exchange you tried to argue that I signed a social contract. Then when you couldn't produce my signature to such document you called me names.

Today it didn't appear to me you ever read the "so-called" social contract, so how would a week ago you'd even know if the Constitution was "re-interpreted"?

[AndroidPolitician]

Look it's pretty obvious you don't know what a social contract is, so you can start here:

tiny[dot]cc/JvmOn

[ifreemantoo]

The Law -Frederic Bastiat

See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.

With such an accurate description of legalized plunder, we cannot deny the conclusion that most government activities, including ours, are legalized plunder, or ... legalized theft. Foreword by Walter E Williams

[ifreemantoo]

Oh I understand your concept of a "social contract" it makes you feel good about legalized stealing.

It also gives cowards a power that they would never use individually against their neighbor. It gives people like you the sense of control, because you know better than me how to spend my labor and resources. Oh I get you.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician,

It's obvious you know nothing about liberty & freedom. It is not the liberty & freedom of a guard dog of a government to steal from the people that gave the guard dog existence.

It is foremost about the guard dog guarding the real individual liberty and freedom of it's Creators the people.

Now I don't know which Constitution you read but you might like the one in Cuba, it seems more to your thinking and nature.

[AndroidPolitician]

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration" - The US Constitution.

[ifreemantoo]

AndroidPolitician wrote [The Congress shall have power to lay taxes...}

Yes I understand that you try to make those say words that it's "legal" for the government to commit armed robbery; to steal publicly what you can't do personally to your neighbor or me; to fund your wealth building, pleasures, failures...

You've written already, that you agree it's OK to legally rob people to get whatever you want.

[Time4SomeTruth]

Smedley Butler

[ddiiaa52]

Well it is happening again.

[ddiiaa52]

I love the Judge!!! He tells it like it is!