Evolution - Missing Link Found!!

[elementaleel]

The neanderthal man just had arthritis? I'm not exactly sure how that gave them more massive bones, pronounced brow ridge, and high bone density. How about the drastically shorter mandibular notch? Should we talk about the conical rib cage common in high respiratory demand animals, not H. sapiens. Thicker frontal cranial wall? Homo neanderthalenis is much more a legitimate find than suggested here.

[HorrorIllogium]

Ratings disabled ✔

Forgot to censor comments ✔

Creationists pwned in the comments section ✔

[nfhslugger]

Too stupid for science??

Try religion!! :D

[PiltdownSuperman]

This post is saturated with self-styled intellectual elites. Too bad they do not have the intellectual honesty required to actually examine the evidence. Instead, they think what they are told to think by Papa Darwin, Richard "Daffy" Dawkins and the like. Then, when confronted with contrary evidence, they fling poo just like their so-called evolutionary ancestors. By the way, if evolution were true, it would not need help by lies and fraud, would it?

[HorrorIllogium]

@PiltdownSuperman No evolutionist EVER mentions piltdown man or any of the hoaxes that were actually discredited by the very scientists you are attacking. You are an idiot.

[snigglefritz12345]

@HorrorIllogium No evolutionist EVER resorts to ad hominem attacks or dodges a perfectly valid point, either, right, Skippy?

[HorrorIllogium]

@snigglefritz12345 That wasn't a valid point. I just explained that evolutionists don't even mention these fossils, except Lucy (which is not considered to be a "3 foot tall chimpanzee", look it up moron.) Creationists will only cite the hoaxes because they have no explanation for real transitionals. You are also stupid btw. Do some research.

[snigglefritz12345]

@HorrorIllogium You are still dodging valid points as well as engaging in ad hominem attacks. I'll write slowly because I know you can't read fast. Pay attention: Evolution uses frauds, misclassifications and blatant errors to "prove" that it is valid. There are very few "transitional forms", if any that are not disputed. Recently, someone cited archaeopteryx (get your mother to look that one up for you), which was reclassified as a true bird decades ago. Transitional forms are scarce at best.

[HorrorIllogium]

@snigglefritz12345 Actually I do know about Archaeopteryx, and it's a funny coincidence that you would mention it as I just finished writing about it in the description of one of my videos. First of all genius, Archaeopteryx is a bird with several reptilian features (teeth,a long tail, free trunk vertebrae, three claws, etc.) making it an undisputed transitional form. The existence of any transitional forms disproves creationism.

[HorrorIllogium]

@snigglefritz12345 You are subscribed to thewayofthemaster. If your understanding of evolution is anything like Ray Comfort's, then it is pointless to have any sort of discussion with you.

[HorrorIllogium]

This is Ray Comfort's(and likely your) idea of evolution:

"Take for instance the first bird. Did the bird breathe? Did it breathe before it evolved lungs? Why did it evolve lungs if it was happily surviving without them? How did it know what need to be evolved if its brain hadn't yet evolved?"

1. Of course the bird breathed you imbecile.

2. Birds have always had lungs.

3. Birds have always had lungs.

4. The brain doesn't control evolution...and I think you're the one whose brain hasn't evolved.

[HorrorIllogium]

@snigglefritz12345 Ray has absolutely no grasp of common descent. He thinks that every single organism evolved eyes, mouths, etc. completely independent of one another. So, please demonstrate that you are less retarded.

[snigglefritz12345]

@HorrorIllogium Why should I do ANYTHING at your demand? You resort to guilt by association, ad hominem, straw man and other logic flaws. Obviously, you not only ignore what I said, but do not understand what you are talking about. Go away, or I shall taunt you again.

[HorrorIllogium]

@snigglefritz12345 You have seen no logic flaws. I explained to you why you are wrong and proceeded to make fun of you because you are stupid. That is justified.

[icthus2010]

Religion eptimizes the ignorance of man....Religion has nothing to do with God but only illustrates mans attempts to reach God.....Christianity however...is God reaching down to man through his son Jesus Christ...the way, the truth and the life...Christianity is not a religion but merely an acceptance of the reality of God, his inerrant word the Bible and salvation through his Son Jesus Christ who died for our sins to reconcile us back to God.

[icthus2010]

Evolution is not even a theory....its simply a hypothesis...this is how stupid people are who believe in and teach Evolution !!

[icthus2010]

Or maybe you heard about the Heidelberg man who was three million years old and it was finally conceded that it was a jawbone of a quite human man. Or maybe you heard about the Java man who was a half a million, or Neanderthal man, or have you been listening lately to the findings about Lucey and all the other people that they supposedly offer as missing links? There are no missing links. These are fully functioning human beings.

[icthus2010]

Oh they've tried, haven't they? You went to school, did you hear about the Nebraska man? Found out that the Nebraska man was the composite from a pig's tooth. Or maybe you read about the Colorado man, it was the composite from a horse tooth they finally admitted. Or maybe the Colorado ape man who was the man composed of the head of somebody's pet monkey. Or the Piltdown man, Mr. Piltdown, it turned out, had borrowed the scull of a modern ape.

[icthus2010]

Scientist Hardy from Canada said, “The search for the missing link is Mr. Hyde at its best. If the evolutionist was using a scientific approach, he would be looking for at least three million missing links for that's the estimate of how many are needed to prove his theory. Dead or alive, they can't produce a single scientifically acceptable trace of intermediate life

[NorthForkFisherman]

And once again, more creationist FAIL. Even the most cursory study of the post crainal fossils of Australopithecines shows an enitrely bipedal existance. The sacrum is short and wide, the knee joints all show a valgus angle similar to that of humans. The talus and femur all show greater sixe due to carrying the weight of a biped torso. Cranially, the skull shows reduced sexual dimorphism and dental characteristics far closer to human than chimpanzee.

[gregrutz]

Lucy was not a chimp, Chimps have evolved as long as we have, till today.

Lucy walked upright, only humans walk upright.

Humans are apes, our ancestors will be apes, same kind, right.

[flamingvacuumcleaner]

I agree with this evidence. I see plenty of examples of Heidelberg man drinking alcohol here in Alice Springs so i doubt they are a seperate species.

[amensandomens]

LOL! everytime i do research on evolution none of it makes sense. supposedly the origin is that the earth already existed and that a meteor full of microbs and such landed in one of earths oceans and when these microbs came into contact with the water they started to evolve and form fish, then fish to birds, dinos, dear, lions, elephants, and monkeys. then the monkeys turned into us. yet monkeys don't evolve anymore. actually nothing has evolved since then. shouldn't something evolve soon???

[AtheistRevolutionX]

It doesn't make sense to you because you either don't want it to or aren't capable enough intellectually to wrap your mind around how it works. I would recommend a College education to start, you don't just understand all of evolution via a 10 min google search. How it all started is still up for debate, "meaning the Universe" of coarse. If this topic peeks your interest continue learning, but be sure your knowledge is drawn from people with real experience and not religious frauds.

[amensandomens]

@AtheistRevolutionX intelligence is an illusion

[magick205]

@amensamdomes: You mean it doesn't make sense TO YOU. Personal incredulity is not a valid argument when discussing the science here. An argument based in verifyable facts is. And, as yet, there is none that supports either ID, nor YEC views. And evolution is occurring all around you. You might want to read MSU Lenski LTEE and check out the data on Hatena arenicola. And I've got LOTS MORE for you when you finish that.

[gregrutz]

@amensandomens wow, stay in school, read a science book.

You have no idea how evolution works.

[EvansRowan123]

Why are you arguing about the details? the conclusive and irrefutible proof is elsewhere (if not everywhere) and so all this could possibly accomplish is arguing that we evolved from something else.

Which we didn't.

[SuperiorAtheist1]

nebraska man wasnt real even the person that drew that picture knew it d-bag and also looking at the video info there is no sciencitfic names for any of the hominds you just showed us other than allmost man, not yet man, and then finally man. Weather you accept it or not humans are the 5th ape along side our cousins chimps,gibbons,gorrilals, orangutans.

[SuperiorAtheist1]

epic fail. 1st I would like to say that neanderthal's was a species that branched off the homind tree

[Mattrix0]

Creationist are morons, do your own investigation on the examples in the info to see what a jerkoff the poster is. Yes Piltdown and Peking were false and it was scientist that pointed that out and for Neanderthal man,hardly arthritis,we even have the whole gnome mapped.another lying creationist at his best or worse Also evolution is not religion by any means,its an occurrence and yes it does have every shred of empirical evidence supporting it Stop relying on bronze aged books for your education

[Inframus]

bravo, bravo

this was the best rick roll ever

[RiaiLud]

Numbers 31: Kill men, children, and non-virgin women. Take virgin women as sex slaves.

[SunshineSupermanXXX]

Numbers 31: Kill men, children, and non-virgin women. Take virgin women as sex slaves.

scientists: make atom bomb to kill everyone, put chemicals in food and pollute the air, land, and seas.

[benitogarciaweblog]

Man and monkey aren't the same. Man has got an aquatic origen, monkey comes from man. Learn it!

[TheFallibleFiend]

"Man has got an aquatic origen"

Geez.

[gregrutz]

"Man and monkey aren't the same"

Finally, A creationist speaks the TRUTH

Man is an APE, we don't have tails!

[sense4nonesense]

Great!

[TheFallibleFiend]

"go skull fuck Lucy. "

Or you could try to get an education.

[mikethe4th]

fuckin rolled again

[SoCalAtheist]

Secondly, nebraska man was never accepted by the scientific community and it was science that proved it was not what it was claimed by Osborne, and Osborne recanted when he himself realized he made an error. But the real crush to your claim, there are now tens of thousands of hominid fossils, not just the few you mention, and all of them support our decent from an ape like ancestor. Please acquire an education on the subject if you wish to speak on it.

[SoCalAtheist]

Yeah sure? Though her bowl shaped ilium is not found in any chimpanzee. Her long bones are far too straight. Her dentition is wrong for a chimpanzee. Essentially, all of her skeletal elements are exactly what you would expect in a small hominid, not a quadroped. Learn your anatomy.

[estratego07]

well at least itsa short rickroll

[PJDesseyn]

huge mistakes...always happens when using creationist propaganda as your "reliable" source.

Lucy: clearly NOT a chimpanzee, different bone structure and all.

Heidelberg man: it's "quite human" because it's a transitional species close to humans.

Nebraska man: never accepted as a real transition

Piltdown and Peking man: hoaxes, never accepted as real transitions.

Neanderthal man: denser and bigger bones, meaning the OPPOSITE of arthritis, but different branch, no ancestor.

fraud, real, real

[AshesWasHerName]

poe's law.

[MWARIO191]

lol

[Atriviality]

Wow. Comic book evidence. Can't argue with that.

Lucy: ALL experts agree Lucy was a hominid.

Heidelberg Man: There are multiple fossils.

Nebraska Man: Only ever fooled 1 scientist.

Piltdown Man: Was a hoax debunked by evolutionary scientists.

Peking Man: Other fossils have been found.

Neanderthal Man: Was a sister species.

Newguinea Man: Never existed anywhere, except in this comic book.

Cromagnon Man: 1 type of extinct homo sapien.

Modern Man: IS a monkey (mammal with 4 grasping limbs).

[KalROFL]

You're a moron.

[Hez0]

Since you haven't addressed all the other fossils (most of them). Does that mean you concede that they are valid?

[TheLORDismySheperd1]

No kidding! "Lucy's" discoverer was also in a hurry to find "evidence" to get his grant. This isn't new informantion, but thanks for posting it for the one's who don't know! :)

[TheFallibleFiend]

"Nearly all experts agree Lucy was just a 3 foot tall chimpanzee."

Lots of ignorant people 'know' lots of false facts. Most experts absolutely do not agree that Lucy was a chimp - just the non-experts at AiG. The other sidebar statements are equally ridiculous. One might read the first hand opinion of the experts - or one can get one's "info" thru the creationist spin filter.

[TheLORDismySheperd1]

I think you posted to the wrong person :)

However, if you enjoy believing you're great-grandpa was a soup, be my guest. And the fact that "educated experts" also believe this is fine with me too. Because Heaven forbid they realize the truth!

But no-no! WE CAME FROM SOUP!

[TheFallibleFiend]

I addressed it to the right person. It doesn't have anything to do with what I "enjoy believing." All that's required to accept evolution is understanding what the theory ACTUALLY SAYS, how evolution ACTUALLY works and then what the REAL evidence is - not the false facts and blather posted on creationist pseudoscientist websites.

[TheLORDismySheperd1]

Only scientists and people who are running from our Lord Jesus who are terrified from the truth; who will ACTUALLY claim they are BORN FROM SOUP rather than admit we have a God created us!!!

And the weird part is that more than likely you're still not happy. You may just doing what you want but it doesn't sound like too happy though.

But I have proof: There's MILLIONS OF ACTUAL PEOPLE that saw thousands of events in a book called, THE BIBLE. (No bones necessarry.)

[TheLORDismySheperd1]

AND God proves Himself every day to me and MILLIONS of other Christians who have a relationship with Jesus Christ. But we believed FIRST.

Why should he prove Himself to someone who believes he came from soup?

Can you imagine what would happen??

"Oh there you are God! Let me blame you for every thing that's gone wrong in my life!"

Wrong answer! You MUST change your heart, or you're not going to be saved; and you CAN BE! Jesus loves you just as much as me and everyone else!

[TheFallibleFiend]

"But I have proof: There's MILLIONS OF ACTUAL PEOPLE"

The bible contains the claims of a few people about millions of people. The bible's claims are just that - claims. They are not very good evidence to any reasonable person. Lots of religious reference manuals make claims. Do you accept the other claims as readily as you do those of the bible?

[YaggaYaggaYagga]

And yet science is a belief, just as religion is. When you get down to the bottom of it, asking the deepest questions of science, all you have to say, and all you ever will, is "Just because it is." Why DOES the universe exist? 'Just because it does.' No reasoning when you get down to the bottom of it. Sure, we've scratched the surface of science, but we will never know the true origins of the universe, how matter actually CAME INTO BEING.

[TheFallibleFiend]

Of course science is not a belief. It's not clear whether those particular questions will ever be answered. But making stuff up that cannot possibly be disproved even if it is wrong is not science and is not a way of arriving at reliable knowledge. Science does give us some very reliable knowledge - including evolution.

[Sophrosyne22]

Evolution aims to destroy the truth of our existence it takes away all the meaning and purpose and blinds you from the life beyond this one! The Bible is Gods Word and the ONLY truth you will ever find. There's no hope in your science and no hope in your money, you close up your eyes pretending you can see. The Bible is the MOST reliable source of knowledge ever it comes from the only source capable of knowing how we began, our creator and is 100% infallible! Don't trust a Fallible Fiend over it

[TheFallibleFiend]

"Evolution aims to destroy the truth ..."

Assertions are not facts.

"The Bible is Gods Word and the ONLY truth you will ever find. "

Assertions are not facts.

You are repeating is just stuff you have been told in an area you have not studied. Evolution is a brilliant product of science. Creationism is systematized ignorance.

[Sophrosyne22]

I believe some people like you are incapable of understanding the origins of the universe because you've been trained to think everything is so complex that it can't be understood. But it is the simplest explanation that is the truth and we can know that God made it all because the evidence is everything you look at. Just ask God to Reveal the truth to you and the blinders come off your eyes and it becomes obvious that God never lied to us in the Bible. It's All True. Wake up People!!!!

[TheFallibleFiend]

I think some people just try to justify being ignorant. Wake up. Go to school. Don't drop out.

[holycrapjesus]

Rickroll is not funny.