Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (93)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Was this supposed to be a hit piece on Lord Monckton?

    It backfired.

    EPIC FAILURE

  • This "interviewer" going up against Monckton is totally out of his league. It's downright embarrassing.

  • Without CO2, we would not be alive, due to the fact that trees create oxygen for us to respire as a direct result of the presence of this natural gas. Best way to kill trees is to TAKE AWAY CO2!!! Then you've got the destruction of habitats for millions of organisms with it, including us. If anything, I want MORE CO2 :D:D:D

  • SustainUS = green hitler youth

  • lol i love how the guy was just "ok, that's interesting. thank you" after being epically clamped

  • @GoldenbanjoDJ Fucking owned, lmao.

  • God bless Lord Monckton.

    Even unknowing that he is being recorded by this shady little camera from this climate-drone, he shows himself to be a helpful, intelligent and well researched patriot for freedom.

    We've just had our coldest winter in 30 years in England, and Lord Monckton is on everybodies tongues as people are looking towards a reason for WHY we have been lied to.

    Keep up the great work!

  • Go, Mockton, go!!

  • Lord Monckton is quite something! My respect.

  • I can't help but wonder if deep down., some people refuse to see anything but media data because they run the risk of having to sacrifice or else 'upgrade' their automobiles. Its a tangled web, folks. I imagine Coal burning might not be the best, but I can't help but wonder what millions of cars running on fossil fuels in the largest countries on earth are doing. Its easy for the masses to single out this individual for his coal plants...what about our cars?

  • This pompous upper-class twit is a propagandized tool.

    Most of the problem of "poor people" starving is due to global warming and oil and resource wars for this upper-class cunts oil-company buddies deplacing millions of people.

    This sneering turd has a huge carbon footprint.

  • How ironic that an old fascist like Monckton would reference the Hitler Youth.

  • How ironic that those who claim to hate Hitler support eugenics programmes he would be proud of

  • @properwired

    Birth control and population planning linked to resource availability is NOT eugenics.

    The real reason you people are so terrified of this is because it demands that people are educated and aware of what's going on, and your sly masters hate this idea.

    Far better for them to have a happy-clapping mass of Denier drones trotting behind the überclass and their pompous talking heads.

  • the kids shooting this video get owned so hard...MONCKTON isn't lying...thank him for opening your eyes in a world where they want them shut

  • Anyone know what coal plants produce?

    Fly ash, used for cinder blocks

    and

    ........the big one

    Water vapor, evil water vapor.......I know this from doing plumbing work at the Iatan and La Cygne power plants around Kansas City. These college kids need to get a job and shut the hell up.

  • I love to see this man interviewed. He always remains completely calm and confident due to his knowledge on the subject. Such a refreshing change from the screeching maniacs who oppose him.

  • It's called "pompous arrogance." Not knowledge.

    Lord Haw-haw has been spoon-fed the Denier propaganda since his owners found him to be a willing tool.

  • LOL.. I've noticed that you use the word "pompous" a lot around these parts. Could it be that the man is simply British and educated? Also, I find it rather ironic that you're concerned with him being spoon-fed propaganda and used as a tool when that is obviously what's happening with the stuttering "youths" he's addressing. I wonder how much energy was used to fly all of these "youths" over to Copenhagen.

  • @headyo

    They used far less than Lord Monckton, and the entire Copenhagen conference was carbon offset, whereas the Denier connedference at the same place was merely carbon conned.

    Conned, just like you.

    And Lord Haw-haw is as pompous as a pompous thing can be.

  • Allieron: People who use words like "carbon offset" cause me to immediately shut down. We have a difference of opinion here and your spewing of global warming buzzwords is not going to make me sit up and pay attention. I have paid attention. I'm freezing. I'm not going to be "brought to the other side" to become a Chicken Little global warming nut, and you're not going to listen to reason. So, aim your spew at someone else, please.

  • @headyo

    You shut down because your Pavlovian programming is, indeed, very well done.

    If you weren't a drone, you'd understand how sadly predictable your Denier brainwashing is, but you are, so you don't.

    You don't have any "reason" on your 'side', because if you did, you'd be laughing sadly at Lord Haw-haw spamming his smirking, pompous guts out to the gullible, ignorant and Denied-to.

  • You're right. I'm a drone. Not even worth writing to, really, so I wonder why you continue to do so. Again...aim your spew at someone who gives a good god damn. Hint: it's not me.

  • hooray for Lord Monckton, the voice of reason amon the sea of climate fools.

  • Belief in climate change has killed more people than Hitler?! If you give any credence to comments like these from Monckton, how can you take seriously anything he says? Preposterous statements like that don't contribute anything to rational debate.

  • ok then how many people have died due to the increas in food prices due to bio fules? On the average, 1 person dies every second as a result, either directly or indirectly, of hunger, if food was cheaper and in more abundance rather than having land to produce soya beans and oil palm then food prices would be lower and less people would die

  • And climate change proponents are responsible for all this are they? For more deaths than Hitler? This is what you think? I am not a bio-fuel proponent, I'm not growing soy beans. Your arguments are weak. Stop frothing at the mouth and try to be objective. And it's spelled FUEL okay?

  • how many people did hitler kill? 6-7million how many people dies of staravtion ? Globally between 13 and 18 million people die each year due to starvation or starvation-related causes, all of which can be helped by the west but are not, insted they are shafted even further by people like demanding action on something mankind has no controll over. and it seem you are the one who has weak arguments and dislike of this man. and also if there was more co2 in the air plant growth would increase

  • Isnt the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isnt it our responsibility to bring that about? Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme

  • The fact is Moncktons reference to climate change proponents as Hitler Youth is an offensive attempt to marginalize the opinions and concerns of people who don't agree with him. Watch the excellent series of videos presented by potholer54 for a balanced inquiry into climate change science and the supposed conspiracy surrounding it. A refreshing non- biased examination of both sides of this debate.

  • what have the entire eco-bed wetters done to people who dont agree with them hmmmm?? these people behave just like the HY marching around disrupting private meetings causeing agro at public meetings, lord m states quite happily that we should look after the environment but this global warming rubish and MMGW are a load of bull plop

  • This is your opinion and I'm happy for you to voice it. I don't feel personally insulted by it and I would not approve of any attempts to silence you. But I'm sorry I can't agree with your devotion to Monckton. I doubt he, and many like him would cross the road to piss on you if you were on fire. You're all awfully impressed by the whole Lord thing aren't you?

  • I am very impressed by his remarks so rare to have one of the upper class on the side of the people. People who do not believe in propoganda are by definition free thinkers guess what it means we follow nobody we unlike you make up are own minds

  • I don't listen to propaganda, least of all yours. I am able to formulate my own ideas and opinions, that's what seems to piss people like you off. You're projecting your own problems outward. Why are you so threatened by someone choosing to disagree with you? Why is it so easy to rattle your cage? Because you only hear what you want to hear. From reading your vitriolic comments, it is clear you are anything but a free thinker. You are a follower.

  • Then explain this if there was a carbon tax where do you think the money would go

  • You must be getting desperate. I don't believe in a carbon tax. I have never advocated a carbon tax, here or anywhere else. I don't feel the need to explain something I think is crap. Stop assuming you know anything about me or what I do or don't advocate.

  • Then why are you arguing with me when it apears we actually agree

  • On some issues I am sure we could agree. When free thinking, rational people engage in robust debate without making baseless assumptions about each other, who knows what may be possible. It's not enough to simply call someone a nazi or whatever in the hope you will make them go away or come around to your way of thinking.

  • The tactics Nazi`s used was to brainwash children this has been perfected under mind control programmes like MK Ultra. Its is clear that education and media are now in the hands of people with agendas and I feel Christopher Mockton has a valid case comparing brainwashed children to the Hitler youth. You are aware of the ties to the people who funded Hitler and those behind the carbon tax so calling the orange shirts Nazi like is in my opinion a fair comparison

  • Unless we announce disasters no one will listen. Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC

  • @dantronamus

    So you'd prefer to wait until the disaster strikes, then paddle around like headless turkeys screaming for help ?

    We've already seen this, in America during Katrina, and during the Indian Ocean Tsunami.

    This was but a mild taste of things to come, and you have NO science to prove otherwise.

    I'll take being forewarned with a "worst-case" scenario any day over being totally unprepared.

  • Look dummy I will make it simple so a fool like you can understand. You go to you doctor he says you will die unless you have an expensive opp he says you need to go to a specialist and he also says you need this opp. Later emails between the doctors are leaked to you by a nurse which shows there was in fact nothing wrong with you. Do you still have the opp. Global warming has been debunked your to stupid to understand this becuase your lazy and prefer to get info of propoganda outlets.

  • The only "dummy" here is you.

    The e-mails prove nothing, only the desperation of your sly masters, and just how fucking gullible you really are.

    Did I tell you I have one of the computers from the Titanic for sale at a very reasonable price ? It only needs a new battery and it's good to go.

    Post your credit card number, secret code and address, and I'll DHL it to you tomorrow morning.

  • Wow you can spot the clue in titanic computer claim how about this clue how at a time the Earths temp was rising were temps on mars also rising. Think the clue is their sunshine yep the sun controls the climate

  • @Properwired

    Why are you so ignorant ?

    What is a Van Allen belt, and what happens when a planetary dynamo stops ?

    What effect does atmosphere have on diffusion of solar radiation, and what protects the Earth, but not Mars, from solar storms ?

    Why do all the Worlds best solar observers agree that the Sun has negligible effect on AGW, and indeed is currently going through a "cool" phase ?

    Research BEFORE you blabber.

  • "and just how fucking gullible you really are."

    For worshiping Climatology, blindly, you really are fucking gullible.

  • KATRINA was caused by HAARP!!! not CO2!!!

  • @allieron if you listen to him, he has much evidence to prove otherwise. he takes the example of Katrina, and shows that the number of hurricanes have been decreasing on the eastern coastf the USA. these weather phenonenom have been present for millions of years before we began to burn hyrdrocarbons. and your use of the tsunami is poor evidence, as was created by tectonic movements under the sea. note the word under; so is unaffected by CO2 above the sea.

  • @danmeeson

    Look at the bigger picture, Dan.

    Monckton draws his "science" from people who are paid shills, like McIntyre, Milloy and all the Heartland Deniers.

    He's a void talking-head with nothing behind him BUT his conceit and arrogance.

    Make the effort to understand the effects of AGW. Look also at the most devastating Hurricanes, and see how many of them we've had in the last few years.

    It's the INTENSITY and unpredictability of the storm's landfall which is the result of AGW.

  • If we are going to dispute the reliability of data then have you seen the recent climategate scandal?! The Uni of East Anglia has admitted to widespread maniuplation of data in favour of AGW. The hockey stick graph, which much of popular debate depended, has been conclusively falsified. As it happens Monckton claims to have plotted his conclusions himself, from data from the Uni of Ilinois and using satellite data.

    But that in itself is not proof of global warming. Cyclical trends perhaps?

  • @danmeeson

    "Climategate" is a sham and a desperate attempt by the Deniers to discredit science. It doesn't, but you may be listening to the wrong people to understand this.

    Google "Factcheck", then "Climategate", or "Realclimate" and "CRU Hack Context" so that you don't appear to be merely a mindless drone serving great evil. ;-)

    Monckton is as much of a scientist as Santa Claus.

  • Monckton never claimed to be a scientist.

  • @headyo

    Mockton has made a huge amount of claims as an "expert", and gloats of his "scientific advisor" status to several Denierbot Central Spawning Hubs. He bloviates with heady scientific verbosity that has the plebs swooning in ecstasy, yet is fuller of bovine feces than Gentleman farmer Smythe-Hornwoggle's cattle yard.

    To see "how much" the good lord proots out as methane, Google this;

    "how-to-diss-a-peer-real-clima­te-scientists-take-on-tvmob"

  • It doesnt matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true. Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

  • We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis. David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive manager

  • a title means very litle to me, the fact that he is a very succsesfull man ready to stand up in what is right when all around him hound him like some sort of heritic. and i am a member of ukip and i have met lord pearson and he was a freindly and as helpfull as any man you could wish to meet, i think your adversion to a title shows more of your problem.

  • Hey, no problem, I don't believe in royalty, the aristocracy or the church. It's not an aversion to titles, its' outright contempt.

  • well i do belive in titles and arisocracy and monarchy and in some ways a church

  • Sounds a little archaic in the 21st century. Medieval even. Always makes me think of that scene in the Holy Grail, "Ooh King eh? Well I didn't vote for you..."

  • well why would it be archaic democracy is old so why is that not the same ? i dont mean direct monarchy i mean british constitutional monarchy. the dutch the danes they have monarchies too hardly backward nations

  • I'm not convinced that we actually have democracy of any substance anymore. I don't agree with title and privilege based on any sort of hereditary birthright. I know, the tourists love that stuff, but becoming a head of state simply because you were born into the right family to score the job? No thanks.

  • well im a ukip member and as far as im concered we lost our democracy ages ago, and now have just a pupet parliment, and a system such as ours has not produced any hitlers francos or stalins

  • Dude you've been lied to:

    We need to get some broad based support, to capture the publics imagination So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports

  • No shit Sherlock! We are all lied to every day. You seem to think that only one side of an argument will lie to the public.

  • Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun. Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University Environmentalist

  • Do your research kid so people do have to do it for you, know who manufactured your consent cause they want you dead:

    "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. The real enemy then is humanity itself.

    - The First Global Revolution (1991) published by the Club of Rome.

  • Comment removed

  • he says on many occasions to not just belive what he says and to do your own research and on actual interviews he sites the sources and burning fossil fules is harmless to think other wise it pretty silly.

  • Stick your mouth over your car exhaust and suck hard! Ever heard of carbon monoxide? Breathing the fumes from car exhausts is sadly a popular form of suicide, yet you parrot Moncktons' stupidity and claim the burning of fossil FUELS to be safe. Keep sucking...

  • the fumes frowm power stations can be filtered as can those on cars and trains etc. and such gasses that do escape in the modern west are a tiny fraction and no cause for concern as we have clean fule and effecient cars. and once again burning fossile fule is perfectly safe, how about you come out of your cave once and a while

  • Your a very silly person who seems unable to understand the most basic info. he clearly stated fossil fuels are harmless when using modern technology what part of the technology bit in his statment failed to register in your moron brain

  • Once again the pot calls the kettle black. I was quoting rule brittania who said, "Burning fossil fules is harmless to think otherwise is pretty silly" So clearly, your own comprehension skills need attention. Why don't you engage your own brain before spouting your reactionary crap. Perhaps it's not your fault, maybe your education was third rate. I mean, the majority of my detractors have a hard time constructing a sentence that makes any sense. Who are the real morons?

  • Ok here is an idea to show my superior thinking to yours why not have a world technology programme with the aim to take away the need for money and whos inventions would be free for all mankind. I fail to see how a global banking elite promoting eugenics Nazi programmes and forcing nations into slavery through dept can be classed as anything other than evil. Your nothing but a Nazi slime if but I feel your to stupid to even know what your viewpoints actually mean

  • I've never mentioned global banking elites. I certainly don't favour the banks. I don't even have a bank account. I think the entire global financial system is evil. I'm generally slandered as a communist, so the nazi tag is new. The fact is though, I'm not interested in your labels. I've never been a member of any political organization. I don't like having words put into my mouth by people with very blunt axes to grind. You resort to pointless insults, very superior thinking indeed.

  • National socialsim and communism socialism are two branches of the same tree. Stalin killed millions of his own people socialism is best explained with a book called animal farm. So stop being the pig living in swine fear

  • Do you assume I've never read a book? George Orwell is one of my favourite writers. As I said earlier, I'm not interested in your labels. As for being a pig living in swine fear, well I don't know what you mean. YOU don't frighten me. What the fuck is your point? Do you even know? Stop behaving like a petulant child, throwing out piss weak assumptions and insults. Let me be clear, I would never join a political group that would have me as a member! And I question EVERYTHING that I read.

  • George Orwell gives me hope then that maybe you are able to understand the dangers of letting government rule you instead of serve you. Carbon tax is like have a tax on air think about it and think about what this fraud is really about. I am all for stopping pollution and improving the conditions people live in this is simply a tax to give more control to the people ruining things for everyone in the first place. It like trying to put out a fire with coal

  • What did I just say? Fuck government and all politicians in the ear. I could care fucking less about the politicians agendas. And to paraphrase Orwell, When I see a policemen raise his truncheon against a worker I know where my loyalties lay.

  • Then surely you see why as a man who cares about others and the future of my children I am mkaing a stand against climate change being used by corporations to enslave people to dept. A book you need to read is Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins

  • Global mega-corporations don't give a flying fuck what you stand up for or against. They already control the social, political, economic and even moral agendas. Regardless of whether you see things like global warming as real or imagined, the real power out there will continue to divide and rule, keeping dissenters mired in pointless running arguments with each other.

  • Monckton rules!

  • Go Monckton go!!!!.... keep educating and opening eyes of the enviro-zombies. You are a gentleman!!!

  • complete ownage

  • Right on Lord Monckton!  You are owning this debate where ever you go...please keep up the good work and help educate more people.

  • NIce job, Christopher. Nice job, indeed.

    Tom Harris

    ED - ICSC

  • Lord Monckton for the Nobel Peace Prize! +1

  • It's nice to see this gentleman contemplated the response as the attempt to drag him into a relief of the "Hitler Youth" label was made. I'd like to note the difference between any association with "Royalty" of this man and his person.

    There's only him. Royalty is a multi-generational power scheme that doesn't rely on the intent of the person. Hence, over time, the intent is skewed toward corruption. This is the basis for elections. I'd vote for this man to lead the world into freedom.

  • Once again Monckton destroys the Hitler Youth Climate Nazis

  • Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not pollution and Global Warming has nothing to do with pollution.

    The average person has been misled and is confused about what the current Global Warming debate is about, greenhouse gases. None of which has anything to do with air pollution.

    People are confusing Smog, Carbon Monoxide (CO) and the pollutants in car exhaust with the life supporting,

    essential trace gas in our atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide (CO2).

  • Lord Monckton for the Nobel Peace Prize!

    Perhaps Al Gore could just give Lord Monckton his peace prize. That way we could save a polar bear by burning less carbon based fuels that is takes to manufacture the Nobel prize. I think Al should just give it to him in Copenhagen so that nobody has to get on a jet and increase their carbon foot print since they are both in Copenhagen anyway. And that might even save another polar bear.

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more