How to disarm a bomb? Teach it phenomenology. ! lol! Great clip, love this oldie. Dan O'bannon, Joe Dante, John Carpenter! All these guys went on to make classic films though this is probably the only time you'll ever see O'Bannon with a joint in his hand in a control room. lol
20 years later and the movie can become good if it is remembered solely by this scene. I think there's a fair separation between good scenes we remember and good movies we remember.
lol haven't even seen the full thing. Carpenter hasn't made anything good for a decade anyway... His best work was with The Thing, shortly after this. Now that, is a good movie with good scenes.
"This is fun!" LOL! at the delivery of that line! I'm interested in seeing this movie but not sure if I have time to... to quote the bomb "I must ponder this further" (stops writing comment)
""This is fun!" LOL! at the delivery of that line! I'm interested in seeing this movie but not sure if I have time to... to quote the bomb "I must ponder this further" (stops writing comment)"
Your sensory apparatus must be faulty because the correct quote is "I must think on this further" ;)
This film demonstrates what creativity will do in the absence of a big budget. Its hilarious. A man having a philosophical talk with a bomb. Its a good argument for keeping artificial intelligence away from destructive hardware.
lol dang i heard this was a memorable philosophical conversation but my i've had this conversation with people before in like Gr 10 drunk at a beach party lmao. i'm not saying i'm smart I'm just saying this is isn't exactly deep.
how do i know that what's red to me isn't green to you? well in reality (and it's there, just talk to someone who disagrees with you about anything and you'll see that the world is very real and exists outside of yourself) it doesn't matter cause you both call it red
The universe is real, but the way it is perceived is objective. Colour only exists in animals which see in colour; To a deaf person, sound doesn't exist. There is no correct way to view the world.
As I said before, The universe is real but our perception of it can vary, but it doesn't matter because it is only our perception of reality. It's a kind of existential thing.
your right, what i said was neither here nor there.
but those wavelengths of light would still be there. if you took away any method of perceiving infrared light (which is lower in energy than ultraviolet) and any method of viewing ultraviolet (higher in energy than infrared) than those wavelengths of light would still have the SAME relation to each other that the "colours" did, no?
i know i really just dont see the "point" of this theory. you cant act on the ideas you get from it because you have no proof that it is correct data. you might as well not be talking to me about this because you have no proof that it is correct data.
OK, we both agree that we have no soul; You and me are the product of our brain/body. Our consciousness depends on our brain/body because there is no soul. A bat is a bat because it has the brain of a bat and the body of a bat.
so then ur not really saying anything when you say "a bat". thats what i meant man. u cant use generalities like that when ue talking to me if ur whole point argues against the possibility of an applicable generality.
Now it all has to be CG laden crap like Avatar where they hit you over the head with an unnuanced plot like "Love the environment and hate the humans and you too may have sex with the blue chick."
@upallhours9 Considering that the total cost of the movie - including all special effects - was somewhere between $35,000 - $60,000 (less than Easy Rider)...
Gregory Jein was one of the effects men who designed the 3d computer graphics and computer screens. He designed the computer graph of the ship's schematics. He went on to do the same thing on Star Wars, A New Hope and then Star Trek movies. He designed the on screen schematics of the Death Star when they had the strategy meeting about how to destroy it.
The real question is why would it be unafraid to cease its existence upon detonation, maybe programmers have learned the lesson well after HAL 9000´s fiasco. This bomb does not even ask if it is going to dream... Intriguing kamikaze ideology.
qi the guy with the beard is dan o bannon he was dissapointed with the alien beachball with claws he was inspired to write the original screenplay for alien
The ending of Dark Star was based on a Ray Bradbury short story called Kaleidoscope from his book 'The Illustrated Man". It's somewhat different to this but also very good with a nice touch at the end which the film misses out. I won't spoil it for you though... read the book. (The rest of the stories are very good too & spawned a pretty good shortened 70's movie which misses out 'Kaleidoscope').
Garboil, I agree with you and have often thought about it. Dan O'Bannon, John Carpenter - amazing! If it triggers discussion from newcomers about Solipsism, logic, history of science fiction - great. You just have to see the entire movie to really enjoy the theatric and surreal humor. Whenever I see an old beach ball, I want to get some rubber chicken feet and I still remember a lot of words of Benson, Arizona!
P1:"A implies B"is true. "A"is true, Thus B is true.
P2:You have an unstated major premise: "If A implies B is true,and A is true,then B is true"
P1:So to be complete;"If A implies B is true and A is true then B is true" is true. "A implies B" is true. "A" is true. Thus B is true.
P2: No wait, you missed another one.
P1: What? which?
P2: "If "If A implies B is true and A is true then B is true"is true and"A implies B"is true is and"A"is true then B is true" would have to be true also.
If I said pure science would that make you more comfortable? Yes they have equivalents, The experiments and observations are done in the abstract. And falsification is core to both math and philosophy, but no to logic. Why not to logic? Falsification is the part of any science that guarantees science is logical. A theory Claims A implies B, which is false if you have just one observed case of A and not B. That IS logic. Logic is not falsifiable in the way that you are used to. Continued.
this has got to be the best sci fi film ever made. still my favorite after all these years. frikkin genius. Love the Dan O'Bannon alien showdown, hilarious.
This movie is scary! Even more so because it really feels like this could actually happen in real life! What if machines starts thinking like this? Then where are we gonna end up??
The bomb is just acting like a suicidal human with a bomb strapped to his chest. All you need is some psychology to stop him from pressing the big red button
A bomb has a purpose for its existence, a sucicidal human (or any human for that matter) doesnt. Trying to convince a bomb to not detonate would be impossible from a psychological standpoint. Thats way people who believe there on a mission from god, regardless of there intentions, are so dangerous. They can justify any action they take.
Phenomenology is a philosophical study of how we perceive our surroundings. Its different from psychology.
"I have no proof you are really telling me this". Brilliant, a true classic. Phenomenology in outer space. The ending to the film is so funny too. As I recall the captain is permanently in cryo although I can't remember why.
I don't see us as opposed. I agree that Russell and Whitehead were barking up the wrong tree, but probably for different reasons than yours.
The aim of life is the acquisition of wisdom as opposed to knowledge or information per se, and both Philosophy and mathematics can help with that. Wisdom is the essence of happiness.
Sorry for another post (not impressed by YouTube's approach to this). Newton would see himself as a philosopher too. Wittgenstein got from engineering via mathematics to Philosophy. Continental philosophy, which is indeed largely b*ll*cks, is rather unlike mathematics and more akin to literature.
Mathematics and philosophy are both applied science. They are in the realm of applied logic. And before you bother, no logic is not part of philosophy nor part of mathematics - It's it''s very own science.
Science involves the application of specific assumed philosophical principles to what is understood to be observation. These principles can be called into question philosophically. If you had two theories which equally well described a phenomenon and falsification was unfeasible or impossible , one choice which might be made is to use Occam's razor, bur logic doesn't dictate that. Also, social forces influence change in scientific theories. I think we can agree these boxes are too small!
I'm interested in what you mean by science. Does it necessarily involve experimentation, falsification and observation? You use the word in a manner i find uncomfortably broad.
Hi,Rob and Candi! Don´t know if I´m in the sad bastard club but I´d like to join! Could use some of your ontology!...And I saw I was alone!!...uh ohh!!
Love this film. Thanks for posting. It has a great premise: that space is too boring for words and that space-explorers get too lazy to fix important faults. A bit like life on weekends in English suburbs. I can't be bothered to vacuum clean the heat exchanger on the back of the freezer, or fix the airlock in the shower pump. I know the Dark Star feeling well enough, but the consequences are milder down here.
This has been the dumbest, yet most concise coloquy concerning agnostic existentialism I have been subjected to yet (way more terse than Satre, but not as funny).
I love Carpenter in equal measure I hate him. No sitting on fence with his films! This film is genius. lets hope they don't remake The Thing! Well no,not strictly speaking, I just hope they don't populate it with teenagers or women. The original was a bunch of dudes who needed the excuse of an alien to bring out their latent prejudice's. God bless chain smoking John!
One of my favorite movies. John Carpenters cool & cheeky answer to Kubricks "2001"! I wish, they digitally restored it the next time. The DVD versions on the market are unfortunately all of bad picture-quality.
In fact, the only difference I can think of is that a sentient weapon would need to sacrifice itself to fulfill it's purpose.
That could result in interesting conundrums, depending on whether they become like suicide bombers vying for their place in paradise like jihadists, or like pacifists, demanding not to be sacrificed in vain...
This movie makes me wanna shave my balls and grow a mustache!
laxiton 2 weeks ago
its like movie spaceballs
arbanaskocudo 3 weeks ago
Great stuff I have always thought of this film as something special.Cheers
Frankiewizard 1 month ago
I did not appreciate this movie when it first came out. Now, I find it a masterpiece!
pnutpuss 2 months ago
How to disarm a bomb? Teach it phenomenology. ! lol! Great clip, love this oldie. Dan O'bannon, Joe Dante, John Carpenter! All these guys went on to make classic films though this is probably the only time you'll ever see O'Bannon with a joint in his hand in a control room. lol
theGhoulman 2 months ago
Brilliant. Love this movie and this sequence is pure stoned genius.
integral 2 months ago
Love the idea of hippies in space.
SteffanLlwyd 3 months ago
This scene is such genius.
Slappo1 6 months ago
can the volume be any lower?
Alvaris 8 months ago 3
"There be light"
*Whoooooooooommmmmmmmm*
Zugvogel1 1 year ago
On the bomb timer it says: Time -> Use only at sub light velocity.
CLASSIC!!!
gwodus 1 year ago 3
The SFX are damn good, considering the Movies' age and its Budget of 60.000 $
kuribayashi84 1 year ago
Bombay? it's stuck in India?
I think you mean Bomb Bay.
misterrbrown 1 year ago
@misterrbrown: The bomb won't mind.
LaburnumDorado 3 months ago
Comment removed
VanRootstuck 1 year ago
1:33
This is fun :)
VanRootstuck 1 year ago
I just love this film. Low budget sci fi films from the 60s ad 70s rock..!!
crawleygat37 1 year ago
I love you John Carpenter.
demoghist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how most of my chats with philosphy majors end
orcgoat 1 year ago
how most of my chats with philosphy majors end
orcgoat 1 year ago
This Movie really was" The Bomb."....Time For a remake...
holysmoke721 1 year ago
i thought this was darkstar dubstep song at first haha
ThePennyboy 1 year ago
COOL MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Spydefender 1 year ago
Maybe you could add *Spoiler* to this?
/shrug
I have not seen this and I cant help but feel like this should have a spoiler tag...
Thanks anyhow, now I know... and knowing is half the battle?
:P
nazaxprime 1 year ago 2
Funny how such a gem of a scene came from such a shitty movie.
MAJORdorMo1992 1 year ago
@MAJORdorMo1992
20 years later and the movie can become good if it is remembered solely by this scene. I think there's a fair separation between good scenes we remember and good movies we remember.
AspiringPotato 1 year ago
@AspiringPotato
That sounds reasonable, but I saw this movie only a few months ago because I thought this scene was genius.
You can imagine my disappointment.
MAJORdorMo1992 1 year ago
@MAJORdorMo1992
lol haven't even seen the full thing. Carpenter hasn't made anything good for a decade anyway... His best work was with The Thing, shortly after this. Now that, is a good movie with good scenes.
AspiringPotato 1 year ago
"This is fun!" LOL! at the delivery of that line! I'm interested in seeing this movie but not sure if I have time to... to quote the bomb "I must ponder this further" (stops writing comment)
RenegadeShepard 1 year ago
@RenegadeShepard
""This is fun!" LOL! at the delivery of that line! I'm interested in seeing this movie but not sure if I have time to... to quote the bomb "I must ponder this further" (stops writing comment)"
Your sensory apparatus must be faulty because the correct quote is "I must think on this further" ;)
RPFS2008 1 year ago
A bomb that talks - how cool is that! I very much like the warning sign on the face of the bomb CAUTION THERMOSTELLAR DEVICE, great!
mikeandhev 1 year ago
I bat off...therefore I am
HALel9000 1 year ago
in the future, we all have badass moustaches
HudsonAO8TQ1 1 year ago 30
@HudsonAO8TQ1 @ we will also all start smoking again
ziggys5 8 months ago
Brain fuck? No, not necessarily. But it does make one think.
graciousSenor 2 years ago
This film demonstrates what creativity will do in the absence of a big budget. Its hilarious. A man having a philosophical talk with a bomb. Its a good argument for keeping artificial intelligence away from destructive hardware.
KurtisERIK 2 years ago
A spoof of 2001and riped off by so many
floatingcompassmedia 2 years ago
Does the Dodgers exist in the middle of 21th century?
nozscrap 2 years ago
RIP Dan O'Bannon
billmarrs 2 years ago
A great movie, think I will have to pull the dvd out and watch it today.
should have let Boiler shoot the support pins
rothhar 2 years ago
now I need to listen to some pinback
BrendanIsCool 2 years ago 3
or to put it another way...
1:do you know my friend Beth?
2:why yes i do
1:isn't she cute?
2:yes, she looks kind of like Leeloo from the fifth element
1:Milla Jovovich?
2:oh you've seen that movie too?
1:yes i have and i agree with you, they do look a little alike
there you go the universe exists
crookedspokeadjacent 2 years ago
lol dang i heard this was a memorable philosophical conversation but my i've had this conversation with people before in like Gr 10 drunk at a beach party lmao. i'm not saying i'm smart I'm just saying this is isn't exactly deep.
how do i know that what's red to me isn't green to you? well in reality (and it's there, just talk to someone who disagrees with you about anything and you'll see that the world is very real and exists outside of yourself) it doesn't matter cause you both call it red
crookedspokeadjacent 2 years ago
The universe is real, but the way it is perceived is objective. Colour only exists in animals which see in colour; To a deaf person, sound doesn't exist. There is no correct way to view the world.
John27346 1 year ago
but dude if we cant see something that truly does exist, than we ARE incorrect. the universe is right, and we're wrong.
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
As I said before, The universe is real but our perception of it can vary, but it doesn't matter because it is only our perception of reality. It's a kind of existential thing.
John27346 1 year ago
ok so if it doesnt matter, you might as well be right. existentialism is I.M.O.
an easy way out of philosophy or debate.
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
What I said wasn't meant to close off the debate.
Imagine if the universe contained no sentient being/thing. In this universe, colour and sound, for example, would not exist.
A colour only becomes a colour when different wavelengths of light are interpreted by the brain as colour.
Reality can't be seen, only interpreted.
John27346 1 year ago
your right, what i said was neither here nor there.
but those wavelengths of light would still be there. if you took away any method of perceiving infrared light (which is lower in energy than ultraviolet) and any method of viewing ultraviolet (higher in energy than infrared) than those wavelengths of light would still have the SAME relation to each other that the "colours" did, no?
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
Sorry for the late reply. anyway,
I keep saying the universe is real, we both agree on that. Try jumping off a tall building and imagining you can fly. It won't work.
Taking IR light as an example, humans can only feel infrared on their skin, but some animals can see at this wavelength.
You can't imagine how they see in IR because you are human. Their reality is so different to ours that humans can't experience it.
What we call reality is filtered through our senses.
John27346 1 year ago
i know i really just dont see the "point" of this theory. you cant act on the ideas you get from it because you have no proof that it is correct data. you might as well not be talking to me about this because you have no proof that it is correct data.
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
Isn't it proof enough to say that you and I can never truly imagine what a bat experiences when it "sees" in the dark with echo location?
John27346 1 year ago
well perhaps not with the current level of technology available to us, but if it's grounded in real science, why not?
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
To experience a bat's existence, you have to be a bat in a bat's body.
You and I are human.
Do you think we have a soul?
John27346 1 year ago
you and i are animals made up of matter and energy, which are really just different states of the same thing. so is a bat.
and i dont think we have a soul.
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
OK, we both agree that we have no soul; You and me are the product of our brain/body. Our consciousness depends on our brain/body because there is no soul. A bat is a bat because it has the brain of a bat and the body of a bat.
John27346 1 year ago
which kind of bat?
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
moreover, which individual bat?
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
Any kind of bat, or any kind of animal. I thought a bat would be a good example because of the way it senses things.
You're getting the hang of it when you ask "which individual bat".
Bat's minds are separate like our minds.
John27346 1 year ago
so then ur not really saying anything when you say "a bat". thats what i meant man. u cant use generalities like that when ue talking to me if ur whole point argues against the possibility of an applicable generality.
crookedspokeadjacent 1 year ago
It took me about 20 minutes to find this on Google since I forgot the title and haven't seen it in a while. Great movie.
KzrrainzYes 2 years ago
One of my favourite all time films.
0ldfinger 2 years ago 3
These older movies have poor special effects, but they make the viewer think.
upallhours9 2 years ago 21
@upallhours9
Yeah, they don't make them like they used to.
Now it all has to be CG laden crap like Avatar where they hit you over the head with an unnuanced plot like "Love the environment and hate the humans and you too may have sex with the blue chick."
AspiringPotato 1 year ago
@upallhours9 Considering that the total cost of the movie - including all special effects - was somewhere between $35,000 - $60,000 (less than Easy Rider)...
fairportfan2 7 months ago
@upallhours9: Think about this one: State of the art SFX won't make a movie any better. Poor SFX won't make it worse.
LaburnumDorado 3 months ago
Gregory Jein was one of the effects men who designed the 3d computer graphics and computer screens. He designed the computer graph of the ship's schematics. He went on to do the same thing on Star Wars, A New Hope and then Star Trek movies. He designed the on screen schematics of the Death Star when they had the strategy meeting about how to destroy it.
KE5RHD 2 years ago
a very enjoyable movie, watched it two days ago! But I would call it " How can a bomb develop solipsism through Carthesian idealism"
Iblisrastaban 2 years ago
The real question is why would it be unafraid to cease its existence upon detonation, maybe programmers have learned the lesson well after HAL 9000´s fiasco. This bomb does not even ask if it is going to dream... Intriguing kamikaze ideology.
MarcoThePrimate 2 years ago
qi the guy with the beard is dan o bannon he was dissapointed with the alien beachball with claws he was inspired to write the original screenplay for alien
buckaroo2323 2 years ago
This seems to have lots of bits missing. Is it from the short version?
MaracaTastic 2 years ago
The ending of Dark Star was based on a Ray Bradbury short story called Kaleidoscope from his book 'The Illustrated Man". It's somewhat different to this but also very good with a nice touch at the end which the film misses out. I won't spoil it for you though... read the book. (The rest of the stories are very good too & spawned a pretty good shortened 70's movie which misses out 'Kaleidoscope').
sitemountain 2 years ago 2
I have been searching for 12 years on what the name of that story was it was thanks to this film I found it again
htomsirveaux42 2 years ago
Hey! Thanks to me too buddy!!
sitemountain 2 years ago
well it was really from another Dark Star video were someone told me that, but thanks anyway
htomsirveaux42 2 years ago
Greatest John Carpenter movie ever.
shouldistillneedone 2 years ago
00.43 :
"Hello bomb"
TroyaE117 2 years ago
This movie is very freaky, just due to the whole setup
LordLugburz 2 years ago
This is a very funny scene.
What with this and the Beachball with Claws!!
Great movie.
dovestones 2 years ago
Garboil, I agree with you and have often thought about it. Dan O'Bannon, John Carpenter - amazing! If it triggers discussion from newcomers about Solipsism, logic, history of science fiction - great. You just have to see the entire movie to really enjoy the theatric and surreal humor. Whenever I see an old beach ball, I want to get some rubber chicken feet and I still remember a lot of words of Benson, Arizona!
tacgirl2000 2 years ago
How is logic its own science if everyone's perception of it varies?
ZootSteppah 2 years ago
this reminds me of * bit theatre
streabarra 2 years ago
one of the greatest sci-fi scenes of all time
stashyjon 2 years ago
P1:"A implies B"is true. "A"is true, Thus B is true.
P2:You have an unstated major premise: "If A implies B is true,and A is true,then B is true"
P1:So to be complete;"If A implies B is true and A is true then B is true" is true. "A implies B" is true. "A" is true. Thus B is true.
P2: No wait, you missed another one.
P1: What? which?
P2: "If "If A implies B is true and A is true then B is true"is true and"A implies B"is true is and"A"is true then B is true" would have to be true also.
P1: ,,,
newexperiment 2 years ago
If I said pure science would that make you more comfortable? Yes they have equivalents, The experiments and observations are done in the abstract. And falsification is core to both math and philosophy, but no to logic. Why not to logic? Falsification is the part of any science that guarantees science is logical. A theory Claims A implies B, which is false if you have just one observed case of A and not B. That IS logic. Logic is not falsifiable in the way that you are used to. Continued.
newexperiment 2 years ago
The bomb talks like one of my best friends. :/
ChoujiMan 2 years ago
this has got to be the best sci fi film ever made. still my favorite after all these years. frikkin genius. Love the Dan O'Bannon alien showdown, hilarious.
garboil 2 years ago
This means, we have no proof of anything.
Interesting.
KzrrainzYes 2 years ago
So you mean this is proof that we have no proof to anything?
John27346 1 year ago
is this like the Bizarro 2001: A Space Odyssey?
htomsirveaux42 2 years ago
One of the best endings to a film. Destroy the ship and have a guy surfboard down a planet's atmosphere
DaSeek3r 2 years ago
thought this was one of the best scenes in the film.....then again the whole movie was warped( and very entertaining)
Specter1957 2 years ago
Let there be light...
QCIC56 2 years ago 3
Great movie.
SecuR0M 2 years ago
It just goes to show, you can't be too careful!
blingpings 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
videos like this should be banned from youtube.....
lag921 2 years ago
any reason why?
gbilios 2 years ago
why?
THADI0US 2 years ago
Yes. BAN EVERYTHING
algoyo 2 years ago 2
BAN IT ALL!
Fucking video's and what not, what the hell where they thinking.
dingles4breakfast 2 years ago
that computer voice is so sexy.
brybish 2 years ago
This is the greatest scene in cinematic history. Too bad the rest of the movie blows.
GBart 2 years ago 5
Well the movie had very (and I mean very) little budget. Of course it blowed if all it's special effects and script writing were done in 5 minutes
DaSeek3r 2 years ago
what's with the dancing/fighting people with the strange music?
anglaismoyen 2 years ago
This movie is scary! Even more so because it really feels like this could actually happen in real life! What if machines starts thinking like this? Then where are we gonna end up??
KamasutraButterfly 2 years ago
The bomb is just acting like a suicidal human with a bomb strapped to his chest. All you need is some psychology to stop him from pressing the big red button
DaSeek3r 2 years ago
@ DaSeek3r
Thats not exactly true.
A bomb has a purpose for its existence, a sucicidal human (or any human for that matter) doesnt. Trying to convince a bomb to not detonate would be impossible from a psychological standpoint. Thats way people who believe there on a mission from god, regardless of there intentions, are so dangerous. They can justify any action they take.
Phenomenology is a philosophical study of how we perceive our surroundings. Its different from psychology.
Protagonist 2 years ago
Hmm that is a good point. This is a highly debatable topic actually when you think about it
DaSeek3r 2 years ago
Sadly, the bomb pushes the button
Magalia369 2 years ago
The elavator and diary-scenes are clearly the best and funniest. I laughed my ass off.
IrishN00B 3 years ago
Fantastic movie. Very tragic ending, and a bit scary, the bomb is a bit intimidating.
anton1990 3 years ago
Dan O' Bannon screenwriter of the first Alien movie.
gbilios 3 years ago
My favourite movie ever!
chr40004 3 years ago
This is an example of why Philosophy is the most important thing there is.
54spiritedwill54 3 years ago
One of THE best movies ever!
I loved this film!
Regards
Andy
hgn53k 3 years ago 3
01110011011011110111001001110010011110010010000001111001011011110111010101110010001000000110001101101111011011010110110101100101011011100111010000100000011010010111001100100000011011100110111101110100001000000110010001101001011101100110100101110011011010010110001001101100011001010010000001100010011110010010000000111000
chichimus 3 years ago 5
there are only 10 types of people. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Gefilta 3 years ago 5
wow thats original :/
rundata 3 years ago 4
yes and no
Gefilta 3 years ago
:/ tewl
rundata 3 years ago
Transepidermal Water Loss ?
Gefilta 3 years ago
you can convert it to hexadecimal!!
gbilios 3 years ago
What a cool concept. Shame yo.u don't see many modern films that don't reflect philosophy in an interesting way. Just bilge like Quantum of Solace
captainpanic08 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
this is a fake video. bombs dont talk!
joshlongstaff 3 years ago
of course its fake!
Pieinthesky999 3 years ago 3
Captain Obvious strikes again!
kant0r 3 years ago
Descartes medititation I and II.
megatan12 3 years ago
This is such an awesome obscure underrated movie and one of my all time top ten faves.
PinkMimosa 3 years ago 2
"I have no proof you are really telling me this". Brilliant, a true classic. Phenomenology in outer space. The ending to the film is so funny too. As I recall the captain is permanently in cryo although I can't remember why.
FlyingIntoTheSun 3 years ago 3
cause hes dead
brighterwest 3 years ago
man that Bomb is funny
Kaprieve 3 years ago 5
"This is fun!"
geoffjburch 3 years ago 5
lol I never realized Dark Star was this funny :p
Lam1ngton 3 years ago
Oh this isn't darkstar orchestra.. lol
Joeyv415 3 years ago
they were awesome at the vibes this year!
Joeyv415 3 years ago
"Wouldn't you consider another course of action? For example, just waiting around a while so we can disarm you?"
Bomb: No.
Haha, Bomb is my inspiration.
loftydowns 3 years ago 3
Thannx metaclips. good vid. I called my motorbike Dark Star after this pic!
Saw this at the cinema with phantom of the Paradise, about 28 yrs ago
raherecolston 3 years ago 2
"Tolby just left the ship without a lifeline"
"That was a dumb thing for him to do."
BTW, the music is NOT "retro" synth music. When this came out, that WAS the synth music, it wasn't retro. :-)
Who said that my generation was dull? I know, I know, we went through that Disco phase, but we also had this too.
I have the original VHS release at home, and I still play it once in a while.
The credits song is called "Benson Arizona" and I have no idea why John used it, but it works.
Sifeca1 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
nazi film that influence bomb builder regan to want dstroy russia and china. this is not funny to kill communists fro capital.
shiralevy 3 years ago
Wow! Sense of humour bypass.
nineteenthly 3 years ago 3
This is an example of why Philosophy is the most important thing there is.
nineteenthly 3 years ago 4
And yet a philosphy degree gets you so little...
Hakudohshi 3 years ago 4
On the contrary. It's the key to happiness. It's mere money it doesn't get you.
nineteenthly 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
philosophy is for failed mathematicians
dibbuck 3 years ago
Philosophy and mathematics are intimately connected. What do you make of Principia Mathematica?
nineteenthly 3 years ago 2
Newton or Russel? The fomer a work of revolutionary insight, the latter a work of misguided bloat.
dibbuck 3 years ago
I don't see us as opposed. I agree that Russell and Whitehead were barking up the wrong tree, but probably for different reasons than yours.
The aim of life is the acquisition of wisdom as opposed to knowledge or information per se, and both Philosophy and mathematics can help with that. Wisdom is the essence of happiness.
nineteenthly 3 years ago
Sorry for another post (not impressed by YouTube's approach to this). Newton would see himself as a philosopher too. Wittgenstein got from engineering via mathematics to Philosophy. Continental philosophy, which is indeed largely b*ll*cks, is rather unlike mathematics and more akin to literature.
nineteenthly 3 years ago
Mathematics and philosophy are both applied science. They are in the realm of applied logic. And before you bother, no logic is not part of philosophy nor part of mathematics - It's it''s very own science.
newexperiment 2 years ago
Science involves the application of specific assumed philosophical principles to what is understood to be observation. These principles can be called into question philosophically. If you had two theories which equally well described a phenomenon and falsification was unfeasible or impossible , one choice which might be made is to use Occam's razor, bur logic doesn't dictate that. Also, social forces influence change in scientific theories. I think we can agree these boxes are too small!
nineteenthly 2 years ago
I'm interested in what you mean by science. Does it necessarily involve experimentation, falsification and observation? You use the word in a manner i find uncomfortably broad.
nineteenthly 2 years ago
mathmatics is for failed philosophers
lousaffire 3 years ago 5
oh, what the hec, EXPLODE! lets push the red button NOW!!!
sewiedess 3 years ago
Hi,Rob and Candi! Don´t know if I´m in the sad bastard club but I´d like to join! Could use some of your ontology!...And I saw I was alone!!...uh ohh!!
loneshanakyle 3 years ago
ah memories. i laughed so hard with the beach ball alien. i LOVE dark star. such sad and lonely men... just like me.
candiFLA 4 years ago 4
I know how you feel, candifla, sincerely. You're okay in my book
robj200735 4 years ago 4
Love this film. Thanks for posting. It has a great premise: that space is too boring for words and that space-explorers get too lazy to fix important faults. A bit like life on weekends in English suburbs. I can't be bothered to vacuum clean the heat exchanger on the back of the freezer, or fix the airlock in the shower pump. I know the Dark Star feeling well enough, but the consequences are milder down here.
SteffanLlwyd 4 years ago 3
I think ,therefore I am.
ayn0612 4 years ago
Dan O'Bannon as Pinback and the talking bomb, great movie this was. I loved the retro synthesizers too
robj200735 4 years ago
5* I saw this years ago when I was a kid. I thought it was great then and I think it is great today. Genius never grows old. :)
And NETFLIX has it...
LivingDog94 4 years ago
you should see this movie while being stoned! One of the funniest experiences of my life!
bistwasist 4 years ago 2
One of my all time favs obviously
darkstar6909 4 years ago
I love this movie!
Ralexand1988 4 years ago
that was really a cool movie
GentleSavage1 4 years ago
This has been the dumbest, yet most concise coloquy concerning agnostic existentialism I have been subjected to yet (way more terse than Satre, but not as funny).
1944epiphonedolphin 4 years ago
paranoid genius.
Got this on tape for my birthday and contains MORE footage than the DVD!
odraconiandevil79 4 years ago
what a great movie this is
adriansalamandre 4 years ago
I think therefor I am - I think I am...
Preninthecleric 4 years ago
i think therefore i think i am
adriansalamandre 4 years ago
I think so
ELGROOVER 3 years ago
I think therefore I am, I think ..
Abernis 3 years ago
I love Carpenter in equal measure I hate him. No sitting on fence with his films! This film is genius. lets hope they don't remake The Thing! Well no,not strictly speaking, I just hope they don't populate it with teenagers or women. The original was a bunch of dudes who needed the excuse of an alien to bring out their latent prejudice's. God bless chain smoking John!
lukenukem1976 4 years ago
Whoops. I think 'they' already did. JC being the first to do it.
chromious 2 years ago
Yes. I know that. I will state clearer. I hope 'they' don't remake a remake.
lukenukem1976 2 years ago
One of my favorite movies. John Carpenters cool & cheeky answer to Kubricks "2001"! I wish, they digitally restored it the next time. The DVD versions on the market are unfortunately all of bad picture-quality.
Rothirsch 4 years ago 2
I love this movie. Its the perfect thing to watch when you want to spark up a blunt and sit back and relax.
paktype 4 years ago 3
*This* is why you shouldn't give weapons consciousness.
tesla4d 4 years ago
but we give weapons TO consciousnesses, what's the difference.
Should we submit our soldiers to mind control so we can control them?
I shall invent this mind control device and name it "propaganda".
roidroid 4 years ago
Good point.
In fact, the only difference I can think of is that a sentient weapon would need to sacrifice itself to fulfill it's purpose.
That could result in interesting conundrums, depending on whether they become like suicide bombers vying for their place in paradise like jihadists, or like pacifists, demanding not to be sacrificed in vain...
tesla4d 4 years ago