Carbon Tax Corruption Scandal, Part 4 - this is going to hurt

[1000frolly]

The whole IPCC/UN CO2 alarmist case rests on a single assumption; which has been proven wrong over and over by empirical evidence.

The IPCC hypothesis is that the warming caused by CO2 will be enhanced by positive cloud feedback.

This positive feedback exists only in their computer models not in the real world.

In the real world there is negative feedback from clouds;

The AGW (positive cloud feedback model) has been TESTED and has FAILED that test. (Lindzen, Christy, Spencer, Brasswell ect. ect)

[2wheels88]

Both parties left & right believe in this false AGW agenda,as an Aussie I've often had to swing vote to keep the bastards honest but there is nowhere left to swing too if you don't believe the hype.I dearly care for the environment and their are so many real issues we should be tackleing,not Co2.I left Greenpeace as a teenager in 1985 when my uncle proved to me it had been taken over by marxists.He was right! they've piggy backed environmentalism to complete Global dominance Agenda.Get out Now!

[7Ethereal7]

CARBON IS PRESENT IN EVERYTHING THAT IS ALIVE, & THIS IS A TAX AGAINST ALL LIVING THINGS.

[BackRoomPokerStar]

Excellent video and series. Keep fighting!

[dudl3y2007]

I'm no PR company like the galileo movement is for the Liberal party! I'm a real human being! If the major polluters pass on a modest price increase the governments assistance package will at least cover it. I note with interest you don't want to comment on one undisputed fact - The Liberals will take from families and give to the big polluters to try to meet the same targets in the same time frame!

This blows your fear/smear and untruthful campaign out of the water!

[GalileoMovement]

@dudl3y2007 Make that a PR Company employed by the Labour Party! Listen to yourself : "modest price increase" "government's assistance package" Gees if you buy a lapsed YT account to hide behind when attacking a political opponent at least spend the extra $50 to buy one from Australia. How much are you charging Julia for this rank amateurism? BTW we clearly address the compensation issue in our comments below and the issue of who we are - I have never been a member of the Liberal Party.

[GalileoMovement]

@dudl3y2007 And why do you care - your from India! ROFL So let me guess, you study Political Science, get your first job and its......lying to people on Youtube. I guess you have to start somewhere....

[dudl3y2007]

What a load of crap. for a start the liberals are going to introduce a price on carbon if they ever win another election, $1300 each household each year. That money will go to the polluters. At least with the Governments plan the polluters are paying for their pollution!

Galileo would be ashamed of this group using his name!

[GalileoMovement]

@dudl3y2007 I love these PR companies that buy dormant accounts here to hide their misleading propaganda comments behind. This is the 3rd time now a long dormant account has sprung to life to criticise our videos. Still nice of you to repeat the failed mantra its the polluters who will pay the carbon tax. No its not, they will pas it on to us, have you actually watched our other videos or read the other comments here.

[Jamjar107]

@dudl3y2007

Dudley.What planet are you on. This is truth. Think back to your physics and Chemistry classes.

[Jamjar107]

Respond to this video... I remeber the false BS re DDT. Good way to let African and other 3rd world people die horribly.

[18paulevans]

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major

businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” -

Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the

Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

[18paulevans]

“All those urging action to curb global warming need to take off the blinkers and give

some thought to what we should do if we are facing global cooling instead.” -

Geophysicist Dr. Phil Chapman, an astronautical engineer and former NASA astronaut,

served as staff physicist at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

[18paulevans]

“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting

warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric

physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in

Pittsburgh

[18paulevans]

“The quantity of CO2 we produce is insignificant in terms of the natural circulation

between air, water and soil... I am doing a detailed assessment of the UN IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science.” - South Afican Nuclear Physicist and Chemical Engineer Dr. Philip Lloyd, a UN IPCC co-coordinating lead author who has authored over 150 refereed publications.

[18paulevans]

“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself

solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate

changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in

man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC

committee

[18paulevans]

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.

[18paulevans]

“Nature's regulatory instrument is water vapor: more carbon dioxide leads to less

moisture in the air, keeping the overall GHG content in accord with the necessary

balance conditions.” – Prominent Hungarian Physicist and environmental researcher Dr.

Miklós Zágoni reversed his view of man-made warming and is now a skeptic. Zágoni was

once Hungary’s most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol.

[18paulevans]

“I am convinced that the current alarm over carbon dioxide is mistaken...Fears about

man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science.” -

Award Winning Physicist Dr. Will Happer, Professor at the Department of Physics at

Princeton University and, who has published over 200 scientific papers, and is a fellow of the American Physical Society, The American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the National Academy of Sciences

[18paulevans]

“The Kyoto theorists have put the cart before the horse. It is global warming that triggers higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, not the other way round…A large 5 number of critical documents submitted at the 1995 U.N. conference in Madrid vanished without a trace. As a result, the discussion was one-sided and heavily biased, and the U.N. declared global warming to be a scientific fact,” Andrei Kapitsa, a Russian geographer and Antarctic ice core researcher.

[18paulevans]

“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics

to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs,

who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American

Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

[18paulevans]

“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact,

as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide

scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical

and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

[18paulevans]

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of

scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government

Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of

NOAA

[18paulevans]

“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based

on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for

example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of

Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

[18paulevans]

“Anyone who claims that the debate is over and the conclusions are firm has a

fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous issues of our time.” - Solar physicist Dr. Pal Brekke, senior advisor to the Norwegian Space Centre in Oslo. Brekke has published more than 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles on the sun and solar interaction with the Earth.

[18paulevans]

“So far, real measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future

warming.” - Scientist Dr. Jarl R. Ahlbeck, a chemical engineer at Abo Akademi

University in Finland, author of 200 scientific publications and former Greenpeace

member.

[18paulevans]

“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t

have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on

scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.” - Indian geologist

Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported

International Year of the Planet.

[18paulevans]

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to

know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC

Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical

chemist.

[18paulevans]

“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can

speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical...The main basis of the claim that man’s release of greenhouse gases is the cause of the warming is based almost entirely upon climate models. We all know the frailty of models concerning the air-surface system.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson,who has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”

[18paulevans]

“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for

Physics, Ivar Giaeve

[18paulevans]

“There are clear cycles during which both temperature and salinity rise and fall. These cycles are related to solar activity...In my opinion and that of our institute, the problems connected to the current stage of warming are being exaggerated. What we are dealing with is not a global warming of the atmosphere or of the oceans.” -- Biologist Pavel Makarevich of the Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

[18paulevans]

“The whole idea of anthropogenic global warming is completely unfounded. There appears to have been money gained by Michael Mann, Al Gore and UN IPCC's Rajendra Pachauri as a consequence of this deception, so it's fraud.” -- South African astrophysicist Hilton Ratcliffe, a member of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa (ASSA) and the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and a Fellow of the British Institute of Physics.

[18paulevans]

“In essence, the jig is up. The whole thing is a fraud. And even the fraudsters that fudged data are admitting to temperature history that they used to say didn't happen...Perhaps what has doomed the Climategate fraudsters the most was their brazenness in fudging the data” -- Dr. Christopher J. Kobus, Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Oakland University, specializes in alternative energy, thermal transport phenomena, two-phase flow and fluid and thermal energy systems.

[18paulevans]

“Please remain calm: The Earth will heal itself -- Climate is beyond our power to control...Earth doesn't care about governments or their legislation. You can't find much actual global warming in present-day weather observations. Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something that the earth routinely does on its own without asking anyone's permission or explaining itself.” -- Nobel Prize-Winning Stanford University Physicist Dr. Robert B. Laughlin, who won the Nobel Prize for physics

[18paulevans]

“Any reasonable scientific analysis must conclude the basic theory wrong!!” -- NASA Scientist Dr. Leonard Weinstein who worked 35 years at the NASA Langley Research Center and finished his career there as a Senior Research Scientist. Weinstein is presently a Senior Research Fellow at the National Institute of Aerospace.

[18paulevans]

“We're not scientifically there yet. Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that this is a problem. Because there is natural variability in the weather, you cannot statistically know for another 150 years.” -- UN IPCC's Tom Tripp, a member of the UN IPCC since 2004 and listed as one of the lead authors and serves as the Director of Technical Services & Development for U.S. Magnesium.

[18paulevans]

There is a simple way to tell the difference between scientists and propagandists. If scientists have a theory, they search diligently for data that might actually contradict their theory so that they test it rigorously or refine it. If propagandists have a theory, they carefully select only the data that might agree with their theory and dutifully ignore any data that might contradict it. Martin Hertzberg

[18paulevans]

Willie Eschenbach comments: "I love the Clean Development Mechanisms. It takes money from people in Europe who wouldn't dream of allowing a hydroelectric dam to be built in their country, and gives it to China to build ... of course ... hydroelectric dams.

Same goes for coal power plants in India - madness!

[18paulevans]

“Because the greenhouse effect is temporary rather than permanent, predictions of significant global warming in the 21st century by IPCC are not supported by the data.” -- Hebrew University Professor Dr. Michael Beenstock an honorary fellow with Institute for Economic Affairs who published a study challenging man-made global warming claims titled “Polynomial Cointegration Tests of the Anthropogenic Theory of Global Warming.”

[18paulevans]

“We maintain there is no reason whatsoever to worry about man-made climate change, because there is no evidence whatsoever that such a thing is happening.” -- Greek Earth scientists Antonis Christofides and Nikos Mamassis of the National Technical University of Athens' Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering.

[18paulevans]

“Global warming is the central tenet of this new belief system in much the same way that the Resurrection is the central tenet of Christianity. Al Gore has taken a role corresponding to that of St Paul in proselytizing the new faith...My skepticism about AGW arises from the fact that as a physicist who has worked in closely related areas, I know how poor the underlying science is. In effect the scientific method has been abandoned in this field.” -- Atmospheric Physicist Dr. John Reid

[18paulevans]

“The dysfunctional nature of the climate sciences is nothing short of a scandal. Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the Climate Science Community.” The global warming establishment “has actively suppressed research results presented by researchers that do not comply with the dogma of the IPCC.” -- Swedish Climatologist Dr. Hans Jelbring

[18paulevans]

“I am ashamed of what climate science has become today.” The science “community is relying on an inadequate model to blame CO2 and innocent citizens for global warming in order to generate funding and to gain attention. If this is what 'science' has become today, I, as a scientist, am ashamed.” -- Research Chemist William C. Gilbert

[18paulevans]

“Hundreds of billion dollars have been wasted with the attempt of imposing a Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory that is not supported by physical world evidences...AGW has been forcefully imposed by means of a barrage of scare stories and indoctrination that begins in the elementary school textbooks.” -- Brazilian Geologist Geraldo Luís Lino, who authored the 2009 book “The Global Warming Fraud: How a Natural Phenomenon Was Converted into a False World Emergency.”

[18paulevans]

“The energy mankind generates is so small compared to that overall energy budget that it simply cannot affect the climate.The planet's climate is doing its own thing, but we cannot pinpoint significant trends in changes to it because it dates back millions of years while the study of it began only recently.”Russian Scientist Dr. Anatoly Levitin, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation of the Russian Academy of Sciences

[wlf57]

this makes so much common sense that im ashamed to admit that i voted labor in the last federal election. I will never do that again! I guess i am a 'lefty' at heart but i dont want or agree with a 'carbon tax'.

[2wheels88]

Search "Georgia Guidestones" and read what is written by these crazy elites.These "people" (and I use that term lightly) hate us and think of us as "useless eaters"&"cannon fodder", their own words.They make me so angry and focused that I study these guys fulltime now.No tv.Nothing they want for humanity is good for us.They're poisoning our kids minds,poisining our water (toxic sillicoflourosilic acid),poisoning our air(aerosol scattering,Barium,aluminumOxid­e,strontium)all found at high levels.

[2wheels88]

I'll dare to go one step further and say they delibarately want to crash our economy as part of a worldwide master plan to have the people literally screaming for a change and they will provide their final solution,World Government.A tyrannical scientific dictatorship they planned long ago.All inked to the UN,IMF,World Bank,CFR,Billderberg,etc. and the Elite owners of all large industry.Read UN Agenda 21 documents on depopulation,they want us gone! they will inherit the future, if we let them!!!

[casesmit11]

Malcolm again shows a complete grasp of the issues and explains them extraordinarily well