The UK peeps do not like the fact the EU stands at all, nor who it SELECTS for positions in it!
Forget the policy side, thats a sympton of the problem. Ms Wallis we dnt like the way the EU works, who it selects, or that its even there! Most of all it has no mandate from the people n until such time the whole thing is up for grabs. If u want MEP's to leave ur m8s alone then lets have a refurendum. At least let us elect the president n council. Then at least u will have some form of ligitimacy!
Diana, your ramblings about free speech do not compensate your bias.
You prejudged Dartmouth's speech as only being intended to gain press attention. This conclusion is without any basis.
Chairing any meeting, whether the local tennis club or in what you like to refer to as a Parliament, the chair is obligated to leave their bias at the door.
Dartmouth is entitled to make his point without fear of being gagged by you or your federalist colleagues.
Yeh I thought that. U cant just presume someone is doing it for press attention. thats just a smear n is jst as bad as the fore.
Free speach can automatically offend. I cld offend someone by saying I was Christian. There is a MASSIVE difference between offensive speach n hate speach. Tho it may not be everyones taste cencoring speach like this is more offensive to the hearer than the one whos been stoped speaking. Let us hear it if its not pure hate. We r smart enough to decide thanks Ms Wallis
The UK peeps do not like the fact the EU stands at all, nor who it SELECTS for positions in it!
Forget the policy side, thats a sympton of the problem. Ms Wallis we dnt like the way the EU works, who it selects, or that its even there! Most of all it has no mandate from the people n until such time the whole thing is up for grabs. If u want MEP's to leave ur m8s alone then lets have a refurendum. At least let us elect the president n council. Then at least u will have some form of ligitimacy!
libertariannews 1 year ago
Comment removed
libertariannews 1 year ago
Fascist
fitnessfirstlie 2 years ago 2
Diana, your ramblings about free speech do not compensate your bias.
You prejudged Dartmouth's speech as only being intended to gain press attention. This conclusion is without any basis.
Chairing any meeting, whether the local tennis club or in what you like to refer to as a Parliament, the chair is obligated to leave their bias at the door.
Dartmouth is entitled to make his point without fear of being gagged by you or your federalist colleagues.
will3205 2 years ago
Yeh I thought that. U cant just presume someone is doing it for press attention. thats just a smear n is jst as bad as the fore.
Free speach can automatically offend. I cld offend someone by saying I was Christian. There is a MASSIVE difference between offensive speach n hate speach. Tho it may not be everyones taste cencoring speach like this is more offensive to the hearer than the one whos been stoped speaking. Let us hear it if its not pure hate. We r smart enough to decide thanks Ms Wallis
libertariannews 1 year ago