i really dont understand, if your going to spend millions on four beautiful new double wasp engines, wouldnt you think to make sure raw fuel doesnt spill on a hot apu in the cockpit, what were these clowns thinking?? all that were taking our time doing it right and then ya blow it on the last day in a complete rush, WTF
@FiveCentsPlease With the benefit of hindsight though a sky crane would have been the better option, make a couple of trips one for the fuselage & wings etc. As you say I'm sure they did the maths & it was there way or nothing.
This info is probably old, but I believe they started with a $500K budget and each flight with equipment was around $15K. They had hoped to sell the plane for around $1M (in 1994 dollars.)
@oceantrolls73 hey bud i thimk that it might be still working generators i can here a sqeual and at 655 u can here a generator so im guessing a generator operating the hydrualics :)
to manage a project like this it looks a little tricky, but this guys looks that they have no room for planing....it's sort of Discovery, wow, what a danger!, wow, how hard!, wow, impossible!...
rick is a bad mofo when it comes to fixin shit
2ndhanseimen 4 months ago
Excellent series .
riotagus 5 months ago
i really dont understand, if your going to spend millions on four beautiful new double wasp engines, wouldnt you think to make sure raw fuel doesnt spill on a hot apu in the cockpit, what were these clowns thinking?? all that were taking our time doing it right and then ya blow it on the last day in a complete rush, WTF
stephenzenaida 5 months ago
I'm growing increasingly worried seeing that old cargo plane take off and land on such soft terrain.
Eurofighter19 6 months ago
They should have just hired a massive Russian helicopter to fly it away to a warm hanger for restoration.
Steve181 7 months ago
@Steve181 Meh. Its more entertaining like this
galloway62042009 6 months ago 5
@Steve181 yeah but the only problem to them is the fact that it's Russian lol
seasonedtoker 5 months ago
@Steve181
I bet that if you look at the money numbers . . . they explain a lot that isn't immediately obvious.
For example: this "entertaining" way of rescuing the plane . . . means they could sell the rights to someone to film the entertainment.
greenrate 3 months ago
@Steve181 thats what i thought when i watched this
19mg94 1 month ago
@Steve181
It was a for-profit recovery operation and renting a heavy lift Sky Crane that guzzles fuel and has a short range would have been very expensive.
FiveCentsPlease 2 weeks ago
@FiveCentsPlease With the benefit of hindsight though a sky crane would have been the better option, make a couple of trips one for the fuselage & wings etc. As you say I'm sure they did the maths & it was there way or nothing.
Steve181 2 weeks ago
@Steve181
This info is probably old, but I believe they started with a $500K budget and each flight with equipment was around $15K. They had hoped to sell the plane for around $1M (in 1994 dollars.)
FiveCentsPlease 2 weeks ago
hey thanks buddy for that reply... some adventure these guys had. take care
oceantrolls73 9 months ago
can landing gears at 6:35 be lowered and raised without running engines? where does the hydraulic pressure come from? thanks anyone.
oceantrolls73 9 months ago
@oceantrolls73 hey bud i thimk that it might be still working generators i can here a sqeual and at 655 u can here a generator so im guessing a generator operating the hydrualics :)
jordan32277 9 months ago
Rick = Hard Bastard.
trumpetbeek 1 year ago 10
thanks for posting this
fordxbgtfalcon 1 year ago
to manage a project like this it looks a little tricky, but this guys looks that they have no room for planing....it's sort of Discovery, wow, what a danger!, wow, how hard!, wow, impossible!...
GRATZIANI2002 1 year ago
7:36 bitch hahaha
KartKing4ever 1 year ago
@KartKing4ever LOL
MAXIE590 1 year ago
agradable desempeño
nice perfomans
MrRicardo1962 2 years ago