this game was sickkkk. I play JV for seymour and i was breathless when i saw naugy score that goall. i really thought it was a for sure that was a goal! we once again got verrrry lucky
Jbob098: Timekeeper never said 0! You must have timed from 9 (yes, best start) to 1 or to ball in goal. I did that several times, ranging from 6.88 to 7.03, averaging 7.0 vs your 7.1. So yes, he COUNTED TOO FAST (8s in 7), NOT TOO SLOW as uhmitscarissa argued to support his hope that real time ran out before ball crossed line at timekeepers ‘1’. He may have started a fraction late, counting a little fast to catch up, but there was time left unless he started his count 2 sec late!
The OFFICIAL time is the CLOCK, NOT the person controlling the clock. He may be the timeKEEPER but HIS countdown is NOT official if there's a clock on the field. I was at the game and just before 1/2 time, the clock counter was off on his countdown. I agree this is a questionable call. Unfortunately, the clock did not have a horn so the refs call is the FINAL call and so it is.....a TIE. (Nice shot though)
too bad this wasnt a goal. u can blame your school for buying a 5000$ scoreboard without a horn on it. not the refs. ha. it definetly didnt go in b4 the buzzer. i had enough time to look at the scoreboard where it sed 0 and then lookd back over and ti still wasnt in. nice try
Unless the time keeper started the countdown nearly 2 sec. late, the ball was in the net before time ran out. See for yourself by pausing the tape and scrolling to where the u-tube counter is in its 6th sec. After you start tape rolling, timer says "10". Pause and scroll ahead to 15th sec on u-tube's counter. The ball is in the goal, less than 9 sec after timers '10'. Timekeeper actually counted fast from his '10' to his"2" after Nolan's shot (8sec). Was only 7 sec from u-tubes 6th to its 13th.
Unless the time keeper started the countdown nearly 2 sec. late, the ball was in the net before time ran out. See for yourself by pausing the tape and scrolling to where the u-tube counter is in its 6th sec. After you start tape rolling, timer says "10". Pause and scroll ahead to 15th sec on u-tube's counter. The ball is in the goal, less than 9 sec after timers '10'
the time keeper was coutning to slow. i was at the game and i was watching the clock. this is a questionable call but you cant say that its a goal cause there isnt a horn.
Yea bob why should he be considered a reliable source.... Uh wait he has the time right in front of him so he can count down and the ref wasn't watching the time he was watching the play yea he's not a reliable source
are you really comparing this call to a United States World Cup goal? lol there's a big difference between the two, and im almost positive that there have been worse calls
Seriously? Because the rule is that the ball must pass the goal line before time is up. And the ball clearly hits the net when the official time keeper says "one."
@skinne013 well in all honestly i am a Seymour fan and i agree the call is questionable but it is certainly not definitively a goal. 1.The man counting down cannot be considered a fully reliable source. 2.The ball DOES NOT hit the net until about a full second after he says one. 3. It is a judgement call by the Ref who in no way can review it and therefor there is no way to overturn it. 4. If Naugatuck had a reasonably loud horn there would be no question, but since it does not the call stands.
@jbob098 1. The man counting down is the OFFICIAL TIMEKEEPER, if he's not a reliable source than who is? The refs don't even keep the time on their watch. 2. The net is 4 feet BEHIND THE GOAL LINE, which is what the ball needs to cross to be considered a goal, not the net. 3. The original call was that it was a goal, therefore the 5 minute meeting in the center of the field to WRONGLY OVERTURN it. 4. The horn didn't blow because the clock stops on a goal. Anymore genius insights?
@skinne013 I have a couple more. Technically then, the "official scorekeeper" could say whatever he wanted and you would just trust him that its correct? I times on a stopwatch how long it took mr. reliable to count from 9 down to 0 and it was 7.1 seconds. Hmmm.. interesting. Also clearly NOT shown in this video is any kind of meeting, so no need to get your panties in a bunch about that. And finally i clearly never said that this should not be a goal. There is just not enough evidence in a big
@skinne013 are you an idiot? the ball was in the air when the clock said 0! if you were there, you would know. if you were there and you really believe that your comment was right, then get your eyes check
this game was sickkkk. I play JV for seymour and i was breathless when i saw naugy score that goall. i really thought it was a for sure that was a goal! we once again got verrrry lucky
slapppyq13 1 year ago
either way the final call was that the goal didnt count. GET OVER IT ! kthanks(:
uhmitscarissa 1 year ago
Jbob098: Timekeeper never said 0! You must have timed from 9 (yes, best start) to 1 or to ball in goal. I did that several times, ranging from 6.88 to 7.03, averaging 7.0 vs your 7.1. So yes, he COUNTED TOO FAST (8s in 7), NOT TOO SLOW as uhmitscarissa argued to support his hope that real time ran out before ball crossed line at timekeepers ‘1’. He may have started a fraction late, counting a little fast to catch up, but there was time left unless he started his count 2 sec late!
utunick 1 year ago
The OFFICIAL time is the CLOCK, NOT the person controlling the clock. He may be the timeKEEPER but HIS countdown is NOT official if there's a clock on the field. I was at the game and just before 1/2 time, the clock counter was off on his countdown. I agree this is a questionable call. Unfortunately, the clock did not have a horn so the refs call is the FINAL call and so it is.....a TIE. (Nice shot though)
PedroiaMVP70 1 year ago
too bad this wasnt a goal. u can blame your school for buying a 5000$ scoreboard without a horn on it. not the refs. ha. it definetly didnt go in b4 the buzzer. i had enough time to look at the scoreboard where it sed 0 and then lookd back over and ti still wasnt in. nice try
PedroiaMVP70 1 year ago
Unless the time keeper started the countdown nearly 2 sec. late, the ball was in the net before time ran out. See for yourself by pausing the tape and scrolling to where the u-tube counter is in its 6th sec. After you start tape rolling, timer says "10". Pause and scroll ahead to 15th sec on u-tube's counter. The ball is in the goal, less than 9 sec after timers '10'. Timekeeper actually counted fast from his '10' to his"2" after Nolan's shot (8sec). Was only 7 sec from u-tubes 6th to its 13th.
utunick 1 year ago
Unless the time keeper started the countdown nearly 2 sec. late, the ball was in the net before time ran out. See for yourself by pausing the tape and scrolling to where the u-tube counter is in its 6th sec. After you start tape rolling, timer says "10". Pause and scroll ahead to 15th sec on u-tube's counter. The ball is in the goal, less than 9 sec after timers '10'
utunick 1 year ago
the time keeper was coutning to slow. i was at the game and i was watching the clock. this is a questionable call but you cant say that its a goal cause there isnt a horn.
uhmitscarissa 1 year ago
Yea bob why should he be considered a reliable source.... Uh wait he has the time right in front of him so he can count down and the ref wasn't watching the time he was watching the play yea he's not a reliable source
nckinne 1 year ago
i agree wheres the horn
1091scott 1 year ago
that is a classic example of a seymour naugy soccer game
1091scott 1 year ago 5
@1091scott
Agreed, great game to watch.
skinne013 1 year ago
are you really comparing this call to a United States World Cup goal? lol there's a big difference between the two, and im almost positive that there have been worse calls
wildcata42 1 year ago
@wildcata42
The biggest similarity is that both goals should have counted!!!
skinne013 1 year ago
The goal should have stood. The seymour players knew they were beat, they already had their hands on their head in disbelief.
goncal1 1 year ago
I see nothing wrong with the ruling!
jbob098 1 year ago
Seriously? Because the rule is that the ball must pass the goal line before time is up. And the ball clearly hits the net when the official time keeper says "one."
skinne013 1 year ago
@skinne013 well in all honestly i am a Seymour fan and i agree the call is questionable but it is certainly not definitively a goal. 1.The man counting down cannot be considered a fully reliable source. 2.The ball DOES NOT hit the net until about a full second after he says one. 3. It is a judgement call by the Ref who in no way can review it and therefor there is no way to overturn it. 4. If Naugatuck had a reasonably loud horn there would be no question, but since it does not the call stands.
jbob098 1 year ago
@jbob098 1. The man counting down is the OFFICIAL TIMEKEEPER, if he's not a reliable source than who is? The refs don't even keep the time on their watch. 2. The net is 4 feet BEHIND THE GOAL LINE, which is what the ball needs to cross to be considered a goal, not the net. 3. The original call was that it was a goal, therefore the 5 minute meeting in the center of the field to WRONGLY OVERTURN it. 4. The horn didn't blow because the clock stops on a goal. Anymore genius insights?
skinne013 1 year ago 4
@skinne013 I have a couple more. Technically then, the "official scorekeeper" could say whatever he wanted and you would just trust him that its correct? I times on a stopwatch how long it took mr. reliable to count from 9 down to 0 and it was 7.1 seconds. Hmmm.. interesting. Also clearly NOT shown in this video is any kind of meeting, so no need to get your panties in a bunch about that. And finally i clearly never said that this should not be a goal. There is just not enough evidence in a big
jbob098 1 year ago
@skinne013 game like that to be absolutely sure of the call
jbob098 1 year ago
@skinne013 are you an idiot? the ball was in the air when the clock said 0! if you were there, you would know. if you were there and you really believe that your comment was right, then get your eyes check
wildcata42 1 year ago
Nolan kinne = God
joesmoe1092 1 year ago