I still can't blieve someone actually solved it (I know this was a computer, I mean a guy literally sat down and solved this thing. took him over a month)
Solving this thing is just a matter of programming the computer with algorithms to do what you want it to do...I think most people just don't want to devote the time to finding them. One of the guys who solved this said he made basically 1 macro, and then just extended it in different ways to do what he needed it for.
You still have to figure out the algorithms to use, and this is the hardest part. like on the regular Rubik's Cube, the most difficult part is making up algorithms; using them is not that difficult. Using macros just makes it go faster, it doesn't make the puzzle any easier.
You are right. For example, I did some macros with over 300 moves (these big ones were macros of macros of macros). That make it faster to solve. And you can also use a tool to find a piece with the colours you want.
I have solved it. It was not really difficult. I had solved 3x3x3x3 and I just needed to make some new algorhyms to solve the 5-coloured cubies and a parity with 4-coloured cubies (rotation).
It took me several hours, so about a week to finish it.
@ChaoMystero Yes, that is a computer solving. But the puzzle is not impossible to solve. You just need to know how to control the puzzle state and move only some pieces while others stay the same place.
By knowing this, be sure that you can move any 3 pieces of the puzzle, without moving others. That was what I did to solve it (not exactly, because I didn't need not to move unsolved pieces, but that's the idea).
By that method, it is not hard even to make computer "learn" to solve it, too.
such a fake
SharkRetriver 2 years ago
Where can you go to play it?
TheKcaJLOL 2 years ago
Man I barley understand what I am looking at.
lostinseganet 2 years ago
Chuck Norris can solve it.
sum182wrestling 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
卐
xthorpyx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is stupid
epic fail
xxtreydayxx 3 years ago
I still can't blieve someone actually solved it (I know this was a computer, I mean a guy literally sat down and solved this thing. took him over a month)
mb1329 3 years ago 8
Solving this thing is just a matter of programming the computer with algorithms to do what you want it to do...I think most people just don't want to devote the time to finding them. One of the guys who solved this said he made basically 1 macro, and then just extended it in different ways to do what he needed it for.
wheeloftimefreak 3 years ago
You still have to figure out the algorithms to use, and this is the hardest part. like on the regular Rubik's Cube, the most difficult part is making up algorithms; using them is not that difficult. Using macros just makes it go faster, it doesn't make the puzzle any easier.
Reddles37 3 years ago
You are right. For example, I did some macros with over 300 moves (these big ones were macros of macros of macros). That make it faster to solve. And you can also use a tool to find a piece with the colours you want.
blackydementor 2 years ago
I have solved it. It was not really difficult. I had solved 3x3x3x3 and I just needed to make some new algorhyms to solve the 5-coloured cubies and a parity with 4-coloured cubies (rotation).
It took me several hours, so about a week to finish it.
blackydementor 2 years ago
@mb1329 omg rly someone actally solved this, i mean een if a computer did i would be amazed
I mean i know the program it's self dose it but thats only by retracing the moves
ChaoMystero 1 year ago
@ChaoMystero Yes, that is a computer solving. But the puzzle is not impossible to solve. You just need to know how to control the puzzle state and move only some pieces while others stay the same place.
By knowing this, be sure that you can move any 3 pieces of the puzzle, without moving others. That was what I did to solve it (not exactly, because I didn't need not to move unsolved pieces, but that's the idea).
By that method, it is not hard even to make computer "learn" to solve it, too.
blackydementor 1 year ago
@mb1329 Someone even did the full on 7^5 one :O:O:O
Guitareben 1 year ago
Human Brain is not enough to solve it. Even mine... :P
X_X
debreczeni99 3 years ago