@aberrari But it does have a higher top speed than a 458. Ive seen videos the Italia being demolished by a standard 911 Turbo. And more so by a Turbo S. But the California fits somewhere in the middle of both, slightly faster than a Turbo, and a couple miles an hour slower than a Turbo S.
California is slower than both 911 also Italia is going to be slower than both 911 in 0-60 and a 1/4 mile because of launch control but in a longer straight race Italia is going to win
Tncman. So what are you saying? hat I don't own an SLS AMG?? PPut your money where your mouth is.Not everyone works at mcdonalds like you.I'll keep you in mind while I am cruising down interstate 75 in southwest florida.Grow up
I also have a 2011 SLS AMG. I have friends that talked shit about it when I bought it.They said I was a fool to pay $200,000 for a car,and how I should have bought a ferrari or lambo.Then I took them for a ride,and they begged me to slow down !They don't talk shit about it anymore.Funny how they all want to ride in it all of the time now.I literally made my girlfriend pee her pants! I mean ''literally'' pee her pants!
@NaDzz7 First of all tough guy,that's the whole reason I am on here checking them out.Whar,are you jealous? I hate to burst your ego,but I do own a 2011 SLS AMG. We are not all poor.Come to marco Island florida,and if you pay me enough,I'll take you for a ride. LOSER!
@Autofilkis Ferrari 458 Italia 0-62 mph-3.2 s, top speed : 202mph, weight 3042lbs. Those stats are all better than the SLS. Out of all the current German supercars, this SLS is probably the least inspiring, so don't even think it outdoes the Italian thoroughbred.
loool merc lovers are u happy because u beat the slowest -right now- selling ferrari, why dont you try running against the 458, may be you will wake up and realize the truth. Dont believe it ??
@shaundeeming the sls is not in the same class as the enzo thats slr territory and about that bike of yours have you heard of the AAriel Atom V8 Supercharged Or The Koinegsegg Agera R
@bosshunterman Obviously we're using different sources. The speed of cars depends on outside conditions, not just the strength of the engine. I, however, am using a single source for my 0-60 times. Motortrend rated the SLS at 3.8 and the SLR at 4.1 on the same track, with similar conditions.
@gruhonjic By the way: SLR 722: 0-122mph(200km/h): 28sec. SLS: 0-122mph: about 35sec.
The SLS and SLR has about the same weight, but the SLR is a bit more powerful (650hp vs 569hp) and it's supercharged engine has unbeatable torque in it's class (820NM vs 620NM)
So the SLS simply not in the SLR's class and it has no way to beat it on a drag race.....
@bosshunterman By the way: SLR 722: 0-122mph(200km/h): 28sec. SLS: 0-122mph: about 35sec....READ THIS CAREFULLY....WTF... 0-200 KM/H i can go with my Honda Accord Type-S in 25-30 sec...lol
@gruhonjic If You Google SLR Mc Laren And Go To The Wikipedia Entry You Will See It Does 0-62 In 3.2 Seconds Plus Motor Trend Tested It And Got 3.3 Seconds Heres The Link
@MrManu161 again numpty not in the same class try lining it up with its class rival ENZO and well see how it does.... my bike would eat any super car part from veyron but would hav it to 220mph all for 20 times less than all these. 4 wheels are shit try 2 then cum back and we will talk speed...
What I meant to say is that there is a HUGE difference in pricing between the two. Anyways, I like the 458 italia. It wooped this thing, and the 911 turbo, in the ass in a race (Top Gear)
I really like Ferrari, in fact the 458 Italia is my favorite super car. But the California is absolutely hideous and terrible. I know someone who has one and what a mistake he made. He could have had the badass SLS, sweet Gallardo LP560, 911 Turbo S, R8 V10, or the Godly 458.
love both of these cars!! Didn't know the SLS was that much faster!! (But then again, the Ferrari Cali is more of a 'family' ferrari hardtop convertible. :p
My black 2011 SLS AMG cost $192,000 in New York in may of 2010.Has 571 hp,not 562.I think 2010's were only available in europe,but I am not sure because I didn't try to buy one until the 2011 model was out.
@peak199 you got the best of both worlds. the ACRs nurburgring crushing Platform and Mercedes/Daimler world winning Engineering. im a huge Viper fan but i love the SLS- there true cousins
@Mr123camaroz28 those appraisals dont in any way factor in the real market value of any special interest car. If im gonna buy a camry (which I would literally rather take the bus than do) I will use KBB. But if someone is looking for a real car that is for naughty purposes, chances are kbb will not give anywhere near an accurate price.
@sovietninja3 i dunno. but i promise you that kelly blue book says it. btw, do u know that although retail is 183k it usually sells 4 around 220k? even more unbelievable.
@Mr123camaroz28 i've seen it at a dealership. it said 213K i think. thats why i think its so weird that kelly blue book would say that the price will go down so low in 5 years
@sovietninja3 yeah. its odd. u usually c cars for cheaper. but an 07 gallardo can be found for 90k, so i expect the resale value for the sls 2 drop fast as well.
the SLS was a freak design wich originally started as the next generation Viper but Daimler Chrysler decided to use it as the SLS wich is why it uses the ACRs platform. its just a small 6.2liter and its damn fast . an 08-2010 Viper SRT10 or 2010 ACR would murder 599 . the SRT10 has an identical 0-60 and 1/4 as the Enzo- both running a stock best of 10-9 at 129. the Enzo had a higher trap speed of 133. so for a million dollars you got .1 quicker ETA lol.
@dddjjf 6200cc is just small..american..and the platform isn t the same at all..chrysler and mercedes have been separated since years..as for the acr..there is no official record under 11s..as there isn t for the enzo..the acr is well over 11, the enzo around 11,0.....however acr did a good work turning a slow car (far away from the declared times..4,45 on 0-100 against 3,9 and 298,7 to 314..around 22,40 if i well remember on the km..) into a pretty fast one,even if nordschliefe time is "false"
@dddjjf Viper V10 (1994) 0-100 in 4,40..top speed 270,8..1km in 23,70 / viper gts (1997 410hp) 0-100 in 4,83..top 286,1..1km in 23,05 / viper gts (2001 380hp) 0-100 in 4,49..top 288,4..1km in 22,96 / Viper srt-10 (2005 506hp) 0-100 in 4,45..top 298,2..1km in 22,21......0-400m for the gts was clearly around 12,5 to be optimist..the srt-10 is practically an half second faster..make your counts..
@dddjjf the problem is the source..american sources are totally meaningless in the whole world..and the motivation is clear..as it's clear the fact american cars aren t almost sold out of their country..while for the other brands the u.s. market is generally easier..and it's this kind of market ,leading the brands to maintain ignorance, lies and average low quality cars in the usa for convenience..the same thing alfa romeo have done in italy for the last 20 years..hope it's time to change
@scratchy996 I think, it's time for you, to have an eye test and wear glasses. Listen, the Germans don't know how to design cars, that's why they always employ foriegners!
honestly, I'm not sure why this race was so uneven. I like both cars 599 California and SLS (liked the Original SLR more than either of these). Regardless, 599 California is very very fast car with just over 600 hp(it's a detuned Enzo engine). New SLS is down on power from SLR, but also lighter. Either way this race should've been much closer...???
@Rick12101996 California is weakest model for ferrari right now...and for Mercedes Benz SLS it`s supercar...you must know that..California is like SLK or CLK for MB....but with double power :) .. SLS in `range` with (maybe) 458 italia or (maybe) 599GTB...both models are not supercars...for Enzo SLS is pussy cat :))
I wonder when AMG transitions to the 5.4 tt if the SLS will be fitted with it too. Lots of cheap tuning options with that mill to get whatever hp number you want with associated torque.
why the heal is this race 4 lol
salman666ksa 1 month ago
@seison5 that's all right
sniperwoolf1113 1 month ago in playlist Drag
AMG=MERCEDES=POWER=GERMAN POWER=GERMAN POWER AND LUXURY!!!
amg rules..
seison5 4 months ago
453bhp vs. 563bhp. No wonder the Ferrari lost once both cars hit 100km/hr.
SPMNDK89 4 months ago
sorry ferarri try again later :)
90987nate 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I see, there is my beauty SUPRA at 1:16
Dritonim 6 months ago
Actually, Ferrari California wasnt made to be fast at all...
aberrari 6 months ago
@aberrari But it does have a higher top speed than a 458. Ive seen videos the Italia being demolished by a standard 911 Turbo. And more so by a Turbo S. But the California fits somewhere in the middle of both, slightly faster than a Turbo, and a couple miles an hour slower than a Turbo S.
MrMadpenguin 6 months ago
@MrMadpenguin
California is slower than both 911 also Italia is going to be slower than both 911 in 0-60 and a 1/4 mile because of launch control but in a longer straight race Italia is going to win
jc4civic 4 months ago
SLS in a straight line is like exactly as fast as a 458
andrewgsupbrah 6 months ago
well that´s a liitle bit unfair, ´cause the ferrari has about 120 hp less than the sls...but i don´t care i´m mercedes fan LoL
yo8man1 6 months ago 3
sls like atomic jet bomb
msprikitiew 6 months ago 8
The SLS has time for a coffee och a nap before the Ferrari get to the finish line.
frenor0302 7 months ago
Did you make the ending clips? As in not just record them but edit them as well?
crzygutrsnobrdr 7 months ago
Tncman. So what are you saying? hat I don't own an SLS AMG?? PPut your money where your mouth is.Not everyone works at mcdonalds like you.I'll keep you in mind while I am cruising down interstate 75 in southwest florida.Grow up
peak199 7 months ago
i love how people talk shit on the sls and yet it WON the race -______- may not be as powerful as the slr but still fucking amazing.
bboyOkkk 7 months ago
Is that an e30 at 1:19!?
the other cars are nice but i just have a thing for the older BMW's :D
LennieRichardson 7 months ago
@LennieRichardson V10 M3 E30 :)
m5boarddotcom 7 months ago 5
@m5boarddotcom i dont think the e30 was ever given a v10 engine... i dont think that any of the m3's were given v10's
TheDynoSoar 7 months ago
the car may be small, but it packs alot of heat :D
Punkmastaflex97 7 months ago
California got shitfucked
Golfplayer959 7 months ago
se podria medir el tiempo con un calendario!!!
MrMadrid77 7 months ago
SLR is faster than SLS AMG.
Paraclete333 8 months ago
I also have a 2011 SLS AMG. I have friends that talked shit about it when I bought it.They said I was a fool to pay $200,000 for a car,and how I should have bought a ferrari or lambo.Then I took them for a ride,and they begged me to slow down !They don't talk shit about it anymore.Funny how they all want to ride in it all of the time now.I literally made my girlfriend pee her pants! I mean ''literally'' pee her pants!
peak199 8 months ago
@peak199 shutup, if you OR I had an SLS, we wouldnt be on here checking them out
NaDzz7 8 months ago
@NaDzz7 i would be. well when im not driving it.
blacksoilder10 7 months ago
@NaDzz7 First of all tough guy,that's the whole reason I am on here checking them out.Whar,are you jealous? I hate to burst your ego,but I do own a 2011 SLS AMG. We are not all poor.Come to marco Island florida,and if you pay me enough,I'll take you for a ride. LOSER!
peak199 7 months ago
@peak199
Are you 16 yet ? I highly doubt that
tnycman 7 months ago
raped
BEA57KL 8 months ago
SLS stock?
uve444 8 months ago
Surprised that the the SLS overtook the Ferrari!! Good show!
smallboymf 8 months ago
Comment removed
bingrasm 8 months ago
@bingrasm - What are you talking about? That's an SLS (563bhp) not an SLR (612bhp).
Mubble 8 months ago
@Mubble u right, wrong place for a right comment
bingrasm 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are two auto brands in the world's Mercedes and the other
KUKABOSSI 8 months ago
@TheDefilade Yeah, but it has about 100hp more
ppp150100 8 months ago
SLS Rullez !! ^_^
Andreey2006 8 months ago
EPIC 1:20 I MISS THE OLD BMW M3 !!!
PoorIllyrian 9 months ago
i like when SLS is smoking the socks of a bad car's driver!!!!
Autofilkis 9 months ago
Never send a California to do a 458's job.
SPMNDK89 9 months ago 4
@SPMNDK89 to be beaten by a SLS AMG? yeeah your right!!!
Autofilkis 9 months ago
@Autofilkis I highly doubt that. The SLS isn't event Stuttgart's finest product. Porsche ridicules AMG in the engineering department.
SPMNDK89 9 months ago
@SPMNDK89 the SLS is way better then a porche thats for shore!! and... could you tell me how fast 458 is? 1-100 toppspeed? weight? ...
Autofilkis 9 months ago
@Autofilkis Ferrari 458 Italia 0-62 mph-3.2 s, top speed : 202mph, weight 3042lbs. Those stats are all better than the SLS. Out of all the current German supercars, this SLS is probably the least inspiring, so don't even think it outdoes the Italian thoroughbred.
SPMNDK89 9 months ago
amg power!!
502silaaanebeskaaa 9 months ago
No surprise at all, the SLS costs,what, double?
slick1ru2 9 months ago
@slick1ru2 just for information, the cost about the same!
nahhansnah 9 months ago
@slick1ru2 The SLS is about the same or maybe a bit cheaper
Hello6761 8 months ago
loool merc lovers are u happy because u beat the slowest -right now- selling ferrari, why dont you try running against the 458, may be you will wake up and realize the truth. Dont believe it ??
visit
fastestlaps. com and compare both.
458scuderia 9 months ago
Ferrari is crap as usual
ENGINE8V 9 months ago
wtf that suks
SuperGustav007 9 months ago
ahahahahha the ferrari for rich girls was left behing, lol. i thougth it would give more fith
stronghold10a 9 months ago
I dont understand your video
Alberthcore 9 months ago
ferrari california 460hp, SLS 570hp----
mikelguti 10 months ago 2
i still love the ferrari california its fuckin awesome!!
co0li30a9 10 months ago
@shaundeeming the sls is not in the same class as the enzo thats slr territory and about that bike of yours have you heard of the AAriel Atom V8 Supercharged Or The Koinegsegg Agera R
Kemfii 10 months ago
@Kemfii The SLS is faster than the SLR lol
gruhonjic 10 months ago
@gruhonjic lol no way not even in a billion years maybe the sls black will come close but defs not the sls
Kemfii 10 months ago
@Kemfii Google it. SLR 0-60: 4.1 SLS 0-60: 3.8
gruhonjic 10 months ago
@gruhonjic O.o ?
2003's SLR: 626hp, 780NM, 1780kg, 0-61mph(0-100km/h): 3.8sec
2006's SLR: 617hp, 778NM, 1768kg, 0-61mph: 3.8sec
2007's SLR(722 edition): 650hp, 820NM, 1726kg, 0-61mph: 3.6sec
If you don't belive it, Google it (lol)....
bosshunterman 9 months ago
@bosshunterman Obviously we're using different sources. The speed of cars depends on outside conditions, not just the strength of the engine. I, however, am using a single source for my 0-60 times. Motortrend rated the SLS at 3.8 and the SLR at 4.1 on the same track, with similar conditions.
gruhonjic 9 months ago
@gruhonjic By the way: SLR 722: 0-122mph(200km/h): 28sec. SLS: 0-122mph: about 35sec.
The SLS and SLR has about the same weight, but the SLR is a bit more powerful (650hp vs 569hp) and it's supercharged engine has unbeatable torque in it's class (820NM vs 620NM)
So the SLS simply not in the SLR's class and it has no way to beat it on a drag race.....
bosshunterman 9 months ago
@bosshunterman By the way: SLR 722: 0-122mph(200km/h): 28sec. SLS: 0-122mph: about 35sec....READ THIS CAREFULLY....WTF... 0-200 KM/H i can go with my Honda Accord Type-S in 25-30 sec...lol
sammirdownhill 9 months ago
@sammirdownhill Yeah, I mean 0-300km/h not 200 :P
bosshunterman 9 months ago
@sammirdownhill HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA
maxxis221 9 months ago
@gruhonjic If You Google SLR Mc Laren And Go To The Wikipedia Entry You Will See It Does 0-62 In 3.2 Seconds Plus Motor Trend Tested It And Got 3.3 Seconds Heres The Link
Kemfii 9 months ago
@Kemfii ?
gruhonjic 9 months ago
@gruhonjic I Mean Theres No Way In A Billion Years A Stock SLS Can Beat A Stock SLR
Kemfii 9 months ago
@Kemfii Why do you use caps on every first letter in you'r words?
BlackTiger112 9 months ago
heyy where is SLS :P haha.. he's going to moon!
Niksonii 10 months ago
570 hp VS 460 hp???
Ahahah no way!!!
viperconcept 10 months ago 2
what?!?
RFreigeldorff 10 months ago
thats embarrassing
ludwigdrummer777 10 months ago 4
did you think that ferrari made that 4 seater, folding-metal-roof, GT car for racing a high performance supercar?
if yes, then why did they made the 458?
if no, right answer
JDbulletplane 11 months ago 4
if you watch Top Gear then you know that the 458 killed the SLS
Cherfan1998 11 months ago
@Cherfan1998 Actually It Was A Draw Both Car Were Equally Matched
Kemfii 10 months ago
@Kemfii i meant at the track with captain slow behind the wheel
Cherfan1998 7 months ago
these guys cant drive.this race is supose to be much closer,on top gear they ran door to door.
alwoo100 11 months ago
@alwoo100 when did top gear ever race an SLS against a california.. that was SLS vs 458 italia on topgear
steflotti105 11 months ago
The California is not racing car the ferrari 458 Italia would kick the sls ass
ThomasJosephBennett 11 months ago
@ThomasJosephBennett
No, SLS will kick Ferrari 458 Italia's Ass.
SMB67T 11 months ago
@SMB67T No way man... SLS its a fat ass, 458 not.
JACLAVE 11 months ago
@JACLAVE
SLS win 458 a bit on a straight line track. ;)
SMB67T 4 months ago
@ThomasJosephBennett Slr 722 would eat the ferrari 458.
MrManu161 11 months ago
@MrManu161 again numpty not in the same class try lining it up with its class rival ENZO and well see how it does.... my bike would eat any super car part from veyron but would hav it to 220mph all for 20 times less than all these. 4 wheels are shit try 2 then cum back and we will talk speed...
shaundeeming 11 months ago
@shaundeeming mclaren f1 on enzo ;P
MrManu161 10 months ago
why sls driver cencored ?? maybe that's the stig ??
Liberaltedjo 1 year ago 77
@Liberaltedjo e stupid you are the copyright and where the 480hp Ferrari can go with a Mercedes 570
Alien377 9 months ago
@Alien377 i don't talk about the power
Liberaltedjo 9 months ago
@Liberaltedjo
He was showing the finger to the Ferrari driver lmao...
tnycman 7 months ago
@tnycman NO u FUCKTARD his blocked his face so u cant see who he is
9goranif 7 months ago
@9goranif
WoW you;re a genius, want a cookie for that finding? Doorknob!!!
tnycman 7 months ago
add some curves and the SLS will eat California's dust...
SLS is like american muscle car... lots of power but zero steering maneouvrability.
danijelbratina 1 year ago
@danijelbratina
the car is from 2010 and not from the 80's. So the sls would destroy the Calif. !
JeNaH04400 1 year ago
@danijelbratina zero? really check it NURB times it can actually handle
armwrestling23 1 year ago
I Love Mercedes Sls ;) Ferrari in Lamerland ;)
krechia 1 year ago
@krechia
The California is not a racing vehicle.
Check out the Ferrari 458
Freakishd 1 year ago
@Freakishd the sls is not a racing vehicle either :P
1985jimmyb 11 months ago
@1985jimmyb
I know. That was a bad comment.
What I meant to say is that there is a HUGE difference in pricing between the two. Anyways, I like the 458 italia. It wooped this thing, and the 911 turbo, in the ass in a race (Top Gear)
Freakishd 11 months ago
I really like Ferrari, in fact the 458 Italia is my favorite super car. But the California is absolutely hideous and terrible. I know someone who has one and what a mistake he made. He could have had the badass SLS, sweet Gallardo LP560, 911 Turbo S, R8 V10, or the Godly 458.
buttnut1080 1 year ago
SLS = Samurai Long Sword???
akudal964 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice review!
Also please check out my channel, i'm a beginning AutoSpotter!
so i would really apreciate if you guys commented or subscribe
Thanks! :D
AutoSpotterDaan 1 year ago
bad start from ferrari
speedfight2wrc 1 year ago
@speedfight2wrc da hääte auch ein guter start nicht viel geholfen :D SLS FTW! I ♥ SLS
ChaosBYwarlock 1 year ago
love both of these cars!! Didn't know the SLS was that much faster!! (But then again, the Ferrari Cali is more of a 'family' ferrari hardtop convertible. :p
SaMaster14 1 year ago
california is a stupid over expensive car, i wud rather get 458 italia instead
3yar1983 1 year ago
@3yar1983 agreed, but the two cars serve totally different purposes.
SaMaster14 1 year ago
sls nice car
silvere60m5 1 year ago
My black 2011 SLS AMG cost $192,000 in New York in may of 2010.Has 571 hp,not 562.I think 2010's were only available in europe,but I am not sure because I didn't try to buy one until the 2011 model was out.
peak199 1 year ago
@peak199 you got the best of both worlds. the ACRs nurburgring crushing Platform and Mercedes/Daimler world winning Engineering. im a huge Viper fan but i love the SLS- there true cousins
dddjjf 1 year ago
The SLS AMG powned it by miles
vili567 1 year ago
in 5 years, according to kelly blue book, the sls amg will be $64k USD. in 5 years the Cali will be worth around 150k....
Mr123camaroz28 1 year ago
@Mr123camaroz28 kbb cant handle appraisals on cars like that.
joeympower 1 year ago
@joeympower they do appraisals on everyday cars that u c on the road everyday. mercedes is 1 of them.
Mr123camaroz28 1 year ago
@Mr123camaroz28 those appraisals dont in any way factor in the real market value of any special interest car. If im gonna buy a camry (which I would literally rather take the bus than do) I will use KBB. But if someone is looking for a real car that is for naughty purposes, chances are kbb will not give anywhere near an accurate price.
joeympower 1 year ago
@Mr123camaroz28 wtf? how
sovietninja3 1 year ago
@sovietninja3 i dunno. but i promise you that kelly blue book says it. btw, do u know that although retail is 183k it usually sells 4 around 220k? even more unbelievable.
Mr123camaroz28 1 year ago
@Mr123camaroz28 i've seen it at a dealership. it said 213K i think. thats why i think its so weird that kelly blue book would say that the price will go down so low in 5 years
sovietninja3 1 year ago
@sovietninja3 yeah. its odd. u usually c cars for cheaper. but an 07 gallardo can be found for 90k, so i expect the resale value for the sls 2 drop fast as well.
Mr123camaroz28 1 year ago
This is an unfair test, Id like to see this Mercedes against a Ferrari 599 GTO or XX. It would be a different result!
MRRRKOOLLL 1 year ago
@MRRRKOOLLL there not in the same class
the SLS was a freak design wich originally started as the next generation Viper but Daimler Chrysler decided to use it as the SLS wich is why it uses the ACRs platform. its just a small 6.2liter and its damn fast . an 08-2010 Viper SRT10 or 2010 ACR would murder 599 . the SRT10 has an identical 0-60 and 1/4 as the Enzo- both running a stock best of 10-9 at 129. the Enzo had a higher trap speed of 133. so for a million dollars you got .1 quicker ETA lol.
dddjjf 1 year ago
@dddjjf 6200cc is just small..american..and the platform isn t the same at all..chrysler and mercedes have been separated since years..as for the acr..there is no official record under 11s..as there isn t for the enzo..the acr is well over 11, the enzo around 11,0.....however acr did a good work turning a slow car (far away from the declared times..4,45 on 0-100 against 3,9 and 298,7 to 314..around 22,40 if i well remember on the km..) into a pretty fast one,even if nordschliefe time is "false"
pazzoallaguida 1 year ago
@pazzoallaguida
Wtf Are You Talking About??
The Viper Was Never Slow- The ACR Runs 11.3 Average. Your Silly For Saying SRT10 run HIgh11s When Gen 2 GTS Coupes Run 11.9-12 Flat
dddjjf 1 year ago
@dddjjf Viper V10 (1994) 0-100 in 4,40..top speed 270,8..1km in 23,70 / viper gts (1997 410hp) 0-100 in 4,83..top 286,1..1km in 23,05 / viper gts (2001 380hp) 0-100 in 4,49..top 288,4..1km in 22,96 / Viper srt-10 (2005 506hp) 0-100 in 4,45..top 298,2..1km in 22,21......0-400m for the gts was clearly around 12,5 to be optimist..the srt-10 is practically an half second faster..make your counts..
pazzoallaguida 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dddjjf 1 year ago
@pazzoallaguida
1992 rt10) 0-60 in 4.9 1/4 12.9-13.0 top speed 160
1996 gts) 0-60 in 4.3 1/4 12.4 top speed 186
2002 gts) 0-60 in 4.0 1/4 12.1 top speed 189
2003 srt0) 0-60 in 3.9 1/4 11.9-12.0 top speed 190
05-06 srt10) 0-60 in 3.7 1/4 11.7-11.8 top speed 198
08-2010 srt10) 0-60 in 3.4 1/4 10.9-11.3 top speed 202
2009 ACR) 0-60 in 3.4 1/4 11.0-11.4 top speed 188
2010 ACR-x) 0-60 in 3.3 1/4 10.8-11flat top speed 197
dddjjf 1 year ago
@dddjjf the problem is the source..american sources are totally meaningless in the whole world..and the motivation is clear..as it's clear the fact american cars aren t almost sold out of their country..while for the other brands the u.s. market is generally easier..and it's this kind of market ,leading the brands to maintain ignorance, lies and average low quality cars in the usa for convenience..the same thing alfa romeo have done in italy for the last 20 years..hope it's time to change
pazzoallaguida 1 year ago
@pazzoallaguida watch?v=0kp0yjz2jI4 making 8 hp less than bone stock on the dyno due to the removed cats and no tune.
watch?v=gTevFbLfm3g another stock viper in the 10's however not verified to be fully stock, only by word.
iPROFITDON 1 year ago
Wow! Mercedes destroyed the Ferrari!! Mercedes SLS AMG looks much nicer than the Ferrari California too, so I would get the SLS anyday!
Corvette90100 1 year ago
Man dat thing has no chance
SuperRockstar206 1 year ago
Chuck Norris is driving the SLS
scapache 1 year ago
The Merc is absolutely ugly disgusting looking! Would buy the Ferrari anyday! A supercar has to look good, especially at that price!
MRRRKOOLLL 1 year ago
@MRRRKOOLLL you need to buy some taste.
scratchy996 1 year ago
Comment removed
MRRRKOOLLL 1 year ago
@scratchy996 I think, it's time for you, to have an eye test and wear glasses. Listen, the Germans don't know how to design cars, that's why they always employ foriegners!
MRRRKOOLLL 1 year ago
honestly, I'm not sure why this race was so uneven. I like both cars 599 California and SLS (liked the Original SLR more than either of these). Regardless, 599 California is very very fast car with just over 600 hp(it's a detuned Enzo engine). New SLS is down on power from SLR, but also lighter. Either way this race should've been much closer...???
stealth07r1 1 year ago
@stealth07r1
Ferrari California it's not the same that Ferrari 599.
Ferrari California 450HP.
SLS 563HP.
foca2002 1 year ago
Merc. AMG is done for race with 571 hp. Ferrari California is a luxurious cabriolet with 460 hp.
Liboni85 1 year ago
close one
kjuu 1 year ago
dear mister m5boarddotcom can u arrange a drag with all cars lined up of at least most as possible? thank you
MrMuscleMacho 1 year ago
The California is a $20k car with an $100k Ferrari badge on it..... :-/
jcdshb3 1 year ago
and the SLS beats the Ferrari YEAH!!!! I like it!
Rick12101996 1 year ago 40
@Rick12101996 yeah the sls has about 200hp more than the california, they should get the 458 there and the story will be different
marcofavav 11 months ago
@marcofavav
actually they are even. look up for urself. the sls is in the end slightly faster (but not worth a mention..)
PS: im talking only about aceleration not track
arijkle 11 months ago
@marcofavav more like a 100hp more
jcbferrari 10 months ago
@Rick12101996 California is weakest model for ferrari right now...and for Mercedes Benz SLS it`s supercar...you must know that..California is like SLK or CLK for MB....but with double power :) .. SLS in `range` with (maybe) 458 italia or (maybe) 599GTB...both models are not supercars...for Enzo SLS is pussy cat :))
sammirdownhill 9 months ago
very close
MrYousafBajwa 1 year ago
wooow amazing editting at the end!!!!
zenenmoro 1 year ago
WHAAAAAAAAAAAT????? THAT SLS IS....Just.. OMG
mkai4492 1 year ago
You guys kidding? They use that SLS AMG as a pace car in Formula 1..
aberrari 1 year ago
whats the name of the song at 0:48??
IPanonymous 1 year ago
Was für ein Spacko der Kerl im SLS sein muß, sich hier ausblenden zu lassen...hält sich scheinbar für Tom Cruise oder Prinz Charles...lächerlich.
kaymalai 1 year ago
not even a fair race, california is much cheaper and was built mainly for looks
warlockplaya 1 year ago
@warlockplaya In the states its only like 10,000 less. thens not a lot when your talking 200,000+. price wise they are pretty even
chris26900 1 year ago
ooofff! the ferrari got raped!
thedrkjones11 1 year ago
Hey Gustav what video editing software do you use?
tven99 1 year ago
I wonder when AMG transitions to the 5.4 tt if the SLS will be fitted with it too. Lots of cheap tuning options with that mill to get whatever hp number you want with associated torque.
shawncweed 1 year ago
i wana try with Ferrari California with my 07 R/T LMAO ferrari must be stupid for doing Ferrari California
mejawmeyaw 1 year ago
@5999cc - No shit. I know all this. Still doesn't take away the fact it got fucking raped. Piss off.
InSorteDiaboIi 1 year ago
Is the SLS driver shy or is it just me ?
NikKast1981 1 year ago
LOL @ the shitty ass Ferrari. Get raped.
InSorteDiaboIi 1 year ago
Compare SLS with Switzer P 800. Nissan will destroy SLS.
ramindavani 1 year ago
@ramindavani compare P800 with sl65 black VANISH it would eat P800 and spit it out
nawzy202 1 year ago
@ramindavani compare 800hp to 571hp .... its Like comparing Fiat Panda vs. BMW 335i
thorek55 1 year ago
hahahahahhahhahahhahaha that mercedes is the best
Alien377 1 year ago
ok give me two pics,one with person you want me to kill,second with sls im gonna get ......
orthodoxdragon1 1 year ago
The California is just a toy...let's compare the SLS with an F599 GTO.
drebinable 1 year ago
@drebinable if you take F599 GTO , then i take the SLR~ Any last words?
saw030690 1 year ago
@saw030690 ...then i take a 1200hp Supra and i destroy you.
drebinable 1 year ago
@drebinable unfortunately how far the Supra can go? Maximize the potential of the car will just destroy yourself...
saw030690 1 year ago
in my town i've seen a sls amg in silver,,, ahh beautiful...
HipHopmyculture 1 year ago
veo este video y me sorprende hace poco vi estos dos modelos y todavia no me la creo hehe
XTYPE0371 1 year ago
ending was a lot better than the race lol
95blckfirebird1 1 year ago