9/11 Truth - Bike Activism and Demolition Video Evidence Montage

[Hullujenpieru]

Very good video .. we should not single out guilty .. the video explains everything IS IT OKAY TO COPY THIS?

[TheMrShah1]

the best video ever maybe now some people will understand but sadly i just showed it to my teacher his reply was i don't but it

[NycWreckage83]

you retard,you should not call urself an american........ you say theres bombs in the building? Just because you compared the 911 video to a controlled demolition you think that everyone is going to believe there was bombs? BIG BUILDINGS LIKE THAT ARE MENT TO FALL DOWN AND NOT FALL TO THE SIDES AND LEAN...... id be glad to give u many more reasons why your wrong.

[Xendrius]

@NycWreckage83 You are the retard here you idiot, everything youd expect to find if 9/11 was an inside job, is there in abundance, and everything youd expect if 9/11 was a suprise attack by some arab conspirators is non existant.

[NycWreckage83]

@Xendrius your a lozer and i will not engage in arrogant conversation with such unintelligent people.... if you were a engineer and knew about this stuff, or perhaps even a construction worker who builds this stuff i would think about talking but otherwise.....do not reply back because you're making a fool of your self. Believe what you want, dont try to pollute other people with such "garbage" as a lack of better words

[Xendrius]

@NycWreckage83 I have researched 9/11 and the science behind it for over 6 years now, I have watched and learned from the 1500 architects and engineers from AE911truth who have proof that the towers not only could never have collapsed but they also have forensic proof for the use of explosives. They also have pilotes, chemical engineers, mettalurgy experts from various countries and they are all professionals in their field.

You clarly lack the IQ and research to figure what I said out.

[ODSTx25]

OMG this is stupid, look this up, what materials were the towers made out of, sheet rock, steal, and concrete, some fire proofing material, when you take into the size of the buildings, the planes, the velocity of the planes as they hit, etc you'll come to find that the buildings falling down the way they did is nothing less then amazing, considering they could have twisted and or fallen into one another or other buildings killing thousands more. it was just dumb luck they came down that way.

[filosofocrates13]

So, the dynamites destroyed the WTC. mmmm What about the planes? did you think that the weight of the tower above the hole maked by the plane was to big to let the tower stand? do you know the law of the air? if you put weight on the air in a cloced space, it finally will get out as he can. that is what u see on th tower , the air getting out by the waight of the levels above.Make your own conclusions.

[TylorDeal]

@filosofocrates13 You would have good logic, if you weren't 5.

[filosofocrates13]

@TylorDeal Do you say that because you are 6? Seriuslly, i din't understand you.

[TylorDeal]

@filosofocrates13 hahaha. I bet you din't understand. learn to spell. But to be honest. I do agree with you a lot.

[filosofocrates13]

@TylorDeal hahahaha yeah, it is easy to see, you can see how that big piece of tower fall down, no explosion, no "dynamits". The only bigs real explosions that everybody saw were did by the crash of the planes and no by dynamite... it's funny, every time that i see a video of the WTC made by those who believe in the conspiracy theory, in the video the importance of the plane crash is reduced and the supposed dynamite is increased.

[TylorDeal]

@filosofocrates13 exactly my point! They just immediately discourage the fact that planes can bring down a building. The reason that the Empire State Building didn't collapse is because it was built earlier with no spray-on fire proofing. Scientists who went to the dump where the WTC pieces of steel are didn't find ANY evidence of thermite. WTC building 7 was a controlled demolition though, the only reason they "pulled it" is because they were planning to anyways. then the planes hit.

[TylorDeal]

@filosofocrates13 And they think it's cool to quote scenes from Pulp Fiction like, "Acts of God are what make the impossible possible, but that morning, doesn't qualify."

[TechnicalArtz]

Thats what i don't understand, Why would the building go down in a straight ? Becasue if a building goes down by "itself" Surely not both sides are going to go at pretty much excactly the same time resulting in a straight fall, I can only think of a controlled demolition, But its not really our place to judge anyway.

[harryfromwork]

@TechnicalArtz Damn right it's your place to judge. Don't be a sheep or a lemming. Think for yourself and get all the information you can....then not only will you be in a place to judge, you will be informed enough to have the confidence in your beliefs.

[rommel7tech]

seeing this video makes me even more upset at the u.s. government..man i hope your shitty country dies

[whodatis2]

I posted this video on my facebook page in remembrance of  911.

[colter073]

and to the dust and what not coming out the sides those are just broken windows that when the top startes falling it pushes out dust and dubrie out of hole or broken windows

[colter073]

that way... i was 5 when i watched this happen on the news i knew that they were fucking planes, im 16 now and i swear to god that i am smarter than some of you idiots on here o this is fake ya they were using explosins blah blah blah bunch of bull shit this y we are so much in deat right now because we have so many fucking idiots in our cocietie and government which they fucking suck too get some one better... sorry for language and for reading, hopefully this puts a little sense into your mind

[colter073]

wow relly anybody who thinks this was a controled explosion your all fucking idiots did you not see live tv when it happened did you not see the planes fly into the building or were they fake planes get out of your fucking basment and step into reality, y in the fuck would some one blow both buildings to make money your losing money your fucking stupid, and ya mabye it falls the same way but that just depends on where the planes hit you can see where the hit on the sides which make them fall

[TheChosenPR]

just watch the vid

watch?v=G43zl4fzDQg&feature=re­lated

Extreme Prejudice - CIA Whistle Blower Susan Lindauer PDX 911Truth

[theTavis01]

the good stuff starts at 1:07

[nemy009]

Oh man! And that is all she wrote. Looks like a controlled demolition to me.

Now that we got that out of the way, lets work on dealing with the criminals responsible. Oh, and we're going to need a few guillotines and a whole lotta rope.

[BlekoBadBoy]

damage on this towers couldnt be repaired so bush decided to collapse them. good video man!

[legoman318]

Great Video man. Just more proof for those who cant think free to argue. wake up America. This was not a plane or a fucking fire. It was VERY VERY well placed explosives.

[aron101112]

i dont know why but this song scares me.....seriously

[pulifric]

This all goes down to you all americans.Move your fucking asses and revolt. New leadership is needed in your country and it's not going to be made in the advantage of the american people by calm succesion of one controlled puppet to another. You need to chose a leader from within the average population,not a fucking actor.

[The0canabis0]

yap america lies alot thats for shore , so called 9/11 is a total crap provided by the pentagon as an acscuse for get some money this is real as it can gets in this fukedup w0rld................

[USEyourREASONNING]

America supported BUSHit.. killed thousands in afganistan, iraq & a lot more Muslims for this orchestrated 9/11,,, so where is justice,,, shouldn't you american people prosecute BUSHit ?

[insideMan1981]

s34711 yesthats true thats why i know you are the real terrorists :)

[insideMan1981]

aidilconcult its not bush ..its tha devil kills people he is not a human being becouse he is a citizan of the hell .

[stratumcorneum]

The metal supports of these buildings were not insulted, as is now required because fire weakens iron beams even though they don't melt. Also, there is an enormous amount of potential energy stored in a high-rise, and when these supports fail, the release is like a bomb going off. Windows are blown out from the pressure of debris falling on top of the stories below. However, in a controlled demolition you see the blasting start at the bottom and go to the top. Here you see the opposite.

[Joelhimself]

@stratumcorneum A collapsing building does not fall at free fall speeds

[stratumcorneum]

@Joelhimself

You're right. A collapsing sky scrapper should fall more gradually, like how an old barn does.

[s34711]

@stratumcorneum I agree i worked comercial construction for over 30 yrs and know fire codes have changed over the years as we learned from mistakes anybody who thinks fire canot bring down a tall building is not very smart the titanic was unsinkable untill it sank

[ThatOneGuyOnYT]

Very sad what the world has become. Truth is just awareness not the end of the questions unanswered. This is the begining of all ENDINGS.

[chico280]

That last video of the building falling is very telling. Like someone instantly kicked the bottom out from under it. I mean there is no way anybody could possibly say thiat it was a fire that did this.

[s34711]

@chico280 if you had a mind of your own you would do some research and find out for yourself that steel does not have to melt it just has to be weakend by extream heat and with the weight of thousands of tons above pushing down with somthing called gravity will bring down a structure

[AnneBoersma]

@s34711 yeah men!!! And everything is so weakened that the entire basic construction fails all at once so the top can reach freefall speed YEAH YEAH YEAH!!! If you had a mind of your own, you would consider the buildings should not fall straight down into itself by only a fire. That is not possible. But you think it is? Argue please

[aidilconcult]

bush kills his own people to start a war against Islam

[TylorDeal]

sorry. an hour and 27 minutes not just 27 minutes.

[TylorDeal]

alright fuck it, yes this was a good video. BUT, Jet fuel has a burning point of 210 °C (410 °F), and I know, steel melts at higher temperatures, but, it did take 27 minutes for it to fall. so that's 410 degrees staying in a building for 27 minutes with the fires from the plane itself burning. so that WILL melt steel in that time. and if you watch any survivor videos, people said that the building had started swaying, so that might've bent the steel, causing the fall.

[bernuga]

this is a great video, and I hope u will find other 100 bikers like u for 911 10th anniversary.I got the name "the wheels of truth"

[insideMan1981]

U.S. government is ill they kill there own people to start a war in iraq i can only say one thing sickkkkk mind sick people there is mutch blood in the hand of the us government.. and i hopee they are gonna fall one day .. this country and the people inside they are too sick we must trow a nucke on the us today

[insideMan1981]

this is not osama bitches who did this :)

[insideMan1981]

usa did this to start the warrrrr on islam ...but usa is gonna looooooose bigggg it takes time fucking americans

[s34711]

@insideMan1981 we have more nukes than you you will never win

[miszczmateusz]

Stay brave my American fellows, you'll find the truth eventually.. In Poland we are doing the same things in case of Smolensk plane 'accident' , we have hard way to go too... Truth and freedom will always preveil!!

[DanUuNoel]

Bicycling 9/11 Truth...that's a clever combination. And so is the side-by-side comparison of the three so-called "fire-induced" WTC skyscraper disintegrations with controlled demolitions.

I humbly suggest to include in future editions the official simulation of WTC7's structural failure. It puts a nice nail in the official fairy tale's coffin, as shown at 911babystep, dot, com, or other fine sites.

Love,

[mrycoffeetea]

Great job, thanks for sharing. If people want to argue about what's right in front of their face, they simply aren't ready to hear it! Cheers! Thanks for spreading love.

[72mhanna]

HANDS DOWN the best vid evidence "montage" I have ever seen. put together VERY WELL!

[smitty121981]

@72mhanna

Thanks! Glad you liked it, please share with your friends!

[MeanGene79]

@smitty121981 He did. He watched it.

[jazzfan5000]

SMITTY, watch YOUR OWN VIDEO one more time and try to tell me that you're NOT comparing the destruction of the WTC to controlled demolitions!! Or do you keep wanting to bullshit me?!!?

[ABP53]

Six Principles of Global Manipulation

youtube.com/watch?v=0fF3TQ0lJn­U

[Wolfbloodvamps171]

The 9/11 attacks weren't an inside job you're dillusional.

[Duphe]

It was a combination of nano-thermite do destroy the tower before it hits the ground and a mini nuclear device exploded beneath each tower, radiating this "ground zero" for decades and heating the underground level for months.

[log140]

nice compilation.. thank you!

[Prototype925]

i agree with niverent

[MossadDid0911]

3 people from government dont like this video

[775marc]

@blackjerryboymetal Maybe you should get an education.There is a subject called physics. Maybe you should learn the basic principles.If these buildings were to actually collapse on their own they would not make a free fall right into the basement.The building would fall over on its side.This is obviously a controlled demolition.Common Sense will tell you this just by watching the video.If you want, do the science you will find that there is no other explanation.Just be stupid and blame bin laden

[smitty121981]

@blackjerryboymetal

"Why do they fireproof the trusses of steel framed high rises?" Well, to keep the steel from heating to the point of failure of course! Yet NIST alleges that WTC7 fell from fires even though the fireproofing did it's job and the structural steel was NOT significantly weakened.

"The free fall bullshit has been debunked years ago." uh... even NIST now admits that WTC7 fell in free fall. Of course they don't say how fire could possibly cause this, but free fall is a FACT

[jazzfan5000]

@smitty121981 Spreading more misinformation, eh Smitty?

[MacGyver920]

WTF is this?!

[MultiDark14]

The thing is why would the american goverment blow up the world trade center?

[debunkerman]

Garbage!

[PURELOVECREW]

Thank you for this amzing video. It brings tears to ones eyes because it shows just how wicked people are. They killed all those people for what? Money and Power.

[Les5146]

Amazing what fire can do isnt it? 100% controlled demolition, 100% an inside job.

[DABOYZinc]

@Les5146 Holy Fucking shit...

You people are retarded, I'll make it fast, instead of listenting to these idiots, go listen to the experts.

History Channel 9/11 Conspiracy's, disproves every single conspiracy, explains what happens to WTC-7, and is presented and researched by EXPERTS, not some self inflated person who thinks they know shit youtube video author....damn.

[Les5146]

@DABOYZinc There are more retards in america than you fucking morons

[Thetan1974]

"At one point, a woman ran off a bus just to ask me for a flyer and then ran back on before the bus left. That was probably the highlight for me."

That one brought tears to my eyes.

Thank you.

[coffeefish]

The large 9/11 Terrorist cell was based in Catholic Boston. The Democrat, Bill Clinton, removed the IRA, a Catholic terrorist group based in Ireland (and around the world) from the Official list of Terrorists. That was necessary, because it would have been bad to have all those American financial supporters of the IRA on the "No Fly" lists.

[TyroneSandalphon]

Great vid Keep up the good work!

PEACE

Ty

[911Infowarrior]

I just got around to checking out all my video responses and I think this is the best one. Simply amazing collection of clips, especially the slow motion HD clip of the collapse @ 1:59 . What video editing program do you use? I am REALLY impressed, Great work my friend, please keep it up!

[911Infowarrior]

My friend, You did an INCREDIBLE job making this video. I am very, very impressed. Please keep up the good work. Adding this to my "911 was an inside job" playlist.

Out of curiosity I must ask, What video editing program do you use?

[niverent]

This is one of the best Truth videos I've seen. The side-by-side comparisons really get the point across.

[smitty121981]

@niverent

thanks!  much appreciated

[TadRapidly]

@niverent still won't convince sheeple. They won't believe until they're in a cattle car on the way to a concentration camp.

[jazzfan5000]

@niverent However, smitty tried to lie to me about the side by side comparisons!!

[smitty121981]

@jazzfan5000

That's funny because I never discussed the side by side comparisons with you at all... so how could I have possibly lied about it?

PS. this was a rhetorical question so you really don't need to bother responding. Ever. Ok?

[jazzfan5000]

@smitty121981 You included side by side comparisons in your video! ONCE AGAIN, watch YOUR OWN VIDEO that YOU POSTED!!

[smitty121981]

@jazzfan5000

yes I know I included side by side, obviously... but why did you say I lied to you about it? The only words I give are descriptive labels. Are you suggesting that something is mislabeled?

[jazzfan5000]

@smitty121981 You know exactly what I'm talking about Smitty! Don't even try to play dumb with me and stop lying! At first you mention explosives in your video then you turn around and told me ON YOUR COMMENT SECTION (look at it, and read it again) that it wasn't RDX. HOWEVER, you are trying to show that there were EXPLOSIONS!! If these were set off by demolition they would have been heard MUCH LOUDER over the roar of the building falling down you idiot!!

[smitty121981]

@jazzfan5000

First of all, I never said that RDX wasn't used. We don't know because standard chemical tests for explosives were never performed. I said on my channel page that RDX is very loud because it has a very high detonation velocity. This video makes reference to nanotechnology based explosives, like nano-thermite, which can be much quieter than RDX but still have plenty of destructive power. Again, it is the expansion of gases that does the destructive work, not the velocity.

[jazzfan5000]

@smitty121981 Smitty, you missed the part about YOU knowing NOTHING about how explosives work! You know why and how you missed that part? BECAUSE YOU DELETED THE COMMENT on your profile YOU LYING, DECEIVING, SNEAKY-ASS SON OF A BITCH!! I love how you Truthers have this way to debate people who won't follow your belief system!! Just delete them if they start to prove you wrong or they catch YOU in a lie! Real good son! Do you have anything more?

[smitty121981]

@jazzfan5000

"YOU knowing NOTHING about how explosives work"

Well don't just take my word for it! Here is what NFPA 921 (national standard for fire and explosion investigation) says:

"Although an explosion is almost always accompanied by the production of a loud noise, the noise itself is not an essential element in the definition of an explosion. The generation and violent escape of gases are the primary criteria of an explosion."

[jazzfan5000]

@smitty121981 There ya go! Cherry picking again, eh?

[Northeastbaseball]

@ShillBasher

Im a Neanderthal?? Its not me who is trying to make up stories without proof actual facts.

[Northeastbaseball]

WACKJOBS!!!!!

[ShillBasher]

@Northeastbaseball

I just misread your name, I thought it said Neanderthalbeast. Perhaps that might suit you better? who knows eh..

[merged]

@smitty, sorry, this si directed to prizim ........hey prizim you are an idiot or a shill, may be both!

[merged]

@smitty, you are an idiot or a shill, may be both!

[admiralct]

i know this song, remind me who it is

"ASK ME ABOUT NANO-THERMITE FOUND IN THE WTC DUST" omg dude. so if thermite was found in the dust, exactly how many explanations are there for that? exactly one? controlled demolition?

[prizim]

hahahahahah! amazing how people decide to ignore science and believe these buildings were demolished by bombs.

educate yourselves and take some physics classes. you will be amazed what science tells you.

[smitty121981]

@prizim

"you will be amazed what science tells you."

Yes, and science tells us that nano-thermite was used. Look for "Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials." and "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe". Both are published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, neither paper is refuted by ANY scientific source, and there is no reason for the presence of nano-thermite other than explosive demolition.

[prizim]

@smitty121981

I am sorry but you are incorrect. Saying that it isn't refuted by any scientific source is ludicrous.

There wasn't any nano thermite found at the scene. I am sorry but you are incorrect.

[smitty121981]

@prizim

"Saying that it isn't refuted by any scientific source is ludicrous." Really? Well then by all means please post the source(s) immediately!

"There wasn't any nano thermite found at the scene" Actually, according to the peer reviewed papers I listed for you, there WAS. There's tons of data to support this including XEDS, SEM, DSC, and photos of unreacted nano-thermite as well as the by-product of reacted nano-thermite (iron-rich microspheres) - both found in 4 of 4 unique dust samples

[thefullmonte2003]

@prizim troll. learn to research before you spout nonsense out your mouth

[prizim]

@thefullmonte2003

the onus is on the people who ignore the facts. the research has to be done by YOU since you ignore the blatant evidence.

[ShillBasher]

@prizim

You find this subject funny in some way?

WTC7's sudden, complete, symetrical freefall collapse cannot be explained by science unless they factor in explosives. If you struggle with the logic of that fact then perhaps this just isn't the subject for you. Fire does not cause a symetrical freefall collapse to large steel framed buildings. If you disagree and you believe you have some proof that can effectively contradict that statement then either post it or stay quiet, you choose.

[prizim]

@ShillBasher

It is not me who requires the proof. it is the person who is going against the facts that requires proof.

you and the uneducated are the ones who need proof.

[ShillBasher]

@prizim

No, wrong yet again, it is organisations like NIST, who present what they choose to call "facts" who need to show proof. If they can't provide any proof then they have absolutely no right to use the words "fact" and "facts".

Scientificaly/ logicaly and visualy the unsubstanciated 'theory' that WTC7 collapsed due to fire and rubble damage is proposterous. Any normal rational person could see with their own eyes that only well placed explosives could produce such a perfect 'job'.

[prizim]

@ShillBasher

Actually, you are incorrect.

You are going against science. You have to provide facts and data as to why you are going against logic and science.

If you can provide any kind of information (none was shown in this ridiculous video) then I will gladly take the stance that the buildings were destroyed via a demolition team. But until any bit of information that proves your point comes forward, i can only believe the facts.

[ShillBasher]

@prizim

Distraction and diversion are clearly your goal here. You care not one jot about truth/ honesty/ justice/ evidence/ or peoples lives. You seek only to dilute this subject with your pre-written bile.

Please block this paid off piece of shit!

[prizim]

@ShillBasher

as usual you go right for insults. that is why your arguments are discarded (even more so than your lack of evidence!)

[ShillBasher]

@prizim

2/3rds of the civilized world know that 9/11 was carried out from within. I can only suggest you either catch up or go and live amoungst the less civilized.

NIST and the commision reported offer NO EVIDENCE to back their theories. An intelligent person would know why. You, on the other hand, seem not to need any PROOF. How do you expect to earn anything but despise with such an empty headed approach to this subject.

[BrodyLuv2]

@prizim

Whos' ignoring Science here as well as ignoring their own eyes' in favour of retoric piled upon whitewashes!?

I would suggest to you Newtons' idea(one of many if you wernt' aware) "A falling body travels through the path of least resistance"..infact so true an idea it is now known as part of a set of basic Laws of Physics(a science incase you were unaware)

I would suggest that you really should take the time to "educate yourself" and not come round here patronising us who have ..cont.

[BrodyLuv2]

@BrodyLuv2

not just choosen to simply believe in what we're doing for ideological purposes but rather that when faced with the massive scientific holes in the evidence provided to the World as genuine good scientific proof we feel it is our duty to point out the obvious discrepencies which there are many to say the least.

Sorry to rant at you but really Ive' had enougth of People trying to tell others who for 9 years have been pointing out the Physical flaws that we need to learn our Physics.

[firstwave2]

@prizim you sound like a complete flake.

[iProveYouWrong]

really good video smitty

[gjfjrjones]

Great job, man! I support you and the entire 9/11 Truth Movement 100%!

[fapsqpz]

Anybody who still thinks that these buildings just 'collapsed' from office fires after seeing this video is a moron!

Excellent editing work Smitty! Hats off to you!

[smitty121981]

@fapsqpz

thanks! glad you liked it!

[ShillBasher]

Very well put together vid. The collapse comparisons are stunning.

Great work!

[smitty121981]

@ShillBasher

thanks so much!

[WTFaboutWTC7]

Excellent

[briandrum1]

Great video!! You're located in Hartford? I'm in Marlborough. I would love to get in touch w/ you next time you're out and about spreading awareness....feel free to send a message...thanks..

[RummelsdorfLabs]

Germany supports you! We had informative protests in over a dozen cities on 9/11. Videos will follow... Thumbs up for your truth-action!

Peace

[Steeper33]

Amazing video and excellent bike activism man.

Thumbs Up!!

[smitty121981]

@Steeper33

thanks for the support!