2 graidstin: Evidence about the Sputnik 1 were heard all over the world, as it trasmitted signals for 22 days. Even in US everybody heard that beep's, what's more do you need? Or are you going to say that's Gagarin wasn't first man in space too? Moron.
Seriously, the only reason people say "I'd list my reasons the moon landing is fake but it's pointless" is because every one can be debunked and they don't want to hear it.
Most of the "captured" German engineers by the Americans were better than the Soviet's "captured" German engineers. Also, to their credit, they admitted to getting their ideas from the American Robert Godard for innovating the idea of liquid propulsion and most of the methods used in their rocket designs: obtained from the details of his patent applications during the 1920's & 30's. The Soviets relied too heavily on solid propulsion.
Russian have beaten US comprehensively in space race..though Americans as usual claim victory even in defeat.Iraq..Afganistan..Vietnam and Korea are some examples.Russia has many firsts ..then why and how US is winner when even to this day Shuttles explode on re-entry and whole Apollo episodes is widely considered to be biggest lie in human history
I'm old enough to remember the folly that the Soviets had in Afghanistan. Nobody outside the realms of fantasy and denial land considers the Apollo moon landings a hoax. Please let us know about the total failure of the Soviet Mars program I would like to hear that, and tell us how many times did Mir catch fire?
Only people dazzled by Americanism believe in their stunts.America needed to build creditworthiness by stunts like Apollo11 so that later it can spend its creditworthiness by just printing paper dollors in exchange for valuable goods and services from other hard working countries like india/china.While russians may not be holy cows..i give full credit to Russian space exploration compared American ones
Russia might have had a few 'firsts' but that was a long time ago, the Russian space program is a shadow of it's former self. The Soyuz module might be reliable but it's getting old very fast and sadly I don't think Vlad Putin is interested in getting it back to it's former glory. He is more interested in bullying the old Soviet sates and tweaking with the gas supply to Europe. So in the meantime I will look towards NASA, ESA and China/India for the next 'firsts'.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Who said america sent man to moon?Its biggest lie in human history.Humans will simply get fried outside vanallen radiation belts and proved there is no techonology in 1960 or even today to protect from these belts unles u carry entire earth atmoshere with u
lol, then why does the scientific community still use data they brought back? All that hoax shit was a desperate commie attempt at propaganda because they failed. If it had been a hoax, the KGB would have truly known about it and the Russians would have done a hoax of their own in response.
Russian sure wud done hoax of their own...man landing on moon never happened?It was real bullshit story.The communication remote sensing and material science techology has improved so many folds that if man cud go to moon then,we wud have watched a football match now happening on moon.But they never returned back after 1973 because it cant repeat the bullshit again and again.
AMERICA sent samples of the moon all over the world for scientist to study. This includes russia.
Now the question is: If the American samples where not real, don't you think russia would have prove it by comparing the samples from the Luna missions?
Ask anyone from the Russian Federal Space Agency to the KGB and you shall learn the truth.
OF 400.000 people that were involved in the Apollo project, no one has come forward to say "it was fake". BUYAKASHA.
Moon samples were claimed to be brought by both russia and america thru robotic missions.The question still remains is, whether man landed or not?My rational mind doesnt agree with all Circumstantial evidence available.
They sent about 0.5kg to the whole world. Very apreciated(sarcasm). Russia had same amount of samples from "Lunohod" program without sending people to the moon. Learn facts.
This is the clincher that proves men landed on the moon. There are people everyday who are whistleblowers. Because there has never been a peep of someone mentioning it was never true, this should cast all doubts aside. Nicely said, ElpatriotaLX
The only sufficient evidence would be another man on the moon. Still NO ONE can go there. I can give you 500+ arguments against this landing, but that's pointless. You won't be able to counter them.
@NDin89 well the soviets were trying REALLY hard to debunk the moon landing and they could find no evidence against it. Also it's been proved multiple times that it would be very difficult, especially back then, to create the movments that the astronouts made in the videos unless in a low gravity enviornmet. What if I said that I think that the launch of sputnik wasn't real do you have any evidence against it, I mean the sattelite itself could never be viewed from earth how do I know its real
The russians sent luna 16, 20 and 24 to the moon and brought back moon soil without humans, they sent lunokhods 1 and 2 rovers, lunokhod 2 traveled 23 miles on the moon during it's mission, no other rover in history even comes close. what the americans did was just put a flag on the moon so they could brag about it, the russians did everything the americans did with robotic probes.
actually yes, the soviet union rovers Lunokhod on the moon surface about 40 years ago? the true first moon landing was made by the soviet union in 1966.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
fuck the US and USSR! They couldn't even imagine about rockets without german engineers! USSR launched first rocket into the space only coz they kidnapped better engineers from germany!
actually the R-7 was created by a russian called krolov it was the americans who used von braun an ex nazi to invent the jupiter missile which put the second satilite into space the explorer 1. so you are wrong
@juancarlosbascu It burned as it came back into orbit on January 4th 1958 (2 years later). The battery lasted 22 days (more then the 2 weeks that were planned).
hitler! stalin! putin! bush! is a childish gay, fooling all people..!!!russian, american, chinese, uk, muslim country, all world nuke? are weakling shit.!!! asteroid cannot blow up earth, comet&blackhole cannot destroy universe, new & old life forms still alive again.!!!
HOW WEAK..!!! ALL NUKES & WEAPONS OF HUMANS CANNOT EVEN DESTROY EARTH.. very very weak weapons..!!!
earth must be planted of super bomb also the universe must be destroyed...!!!
before I die I must visit this place
awesomazinglyepicool 5 months ago
Прикольно мы тогда себя чувствовали... США чуть не лопнули от зависти! :D
Gtacriminalrussia 9 months ago
Russians rules this planet
GivenchyParisFr 11 months ago
First came Sputnik. Later came mutnik.
oakroyal 11 months ago
2 graidstin: Evidence about the Sputnik 1 were heard all over the world, as it trasmitted signals for 22 days. Even in US everybody heard that beep's, what's more do you need? Or are you going to say that's Gagarin wasn't first man in space too? Moron.
arkstone 1 year ago
21 days
2020genetics 1 year ago
Seriously, the only reason people say "I'd list my reasons the moon landing is fake but it's pointless" is because every one can be debunked and they don't want to hear it.
battousai9439 1 year ago
Da, Komrade.
For the glory of Mother Russia!
darkgodnaar 2 years ago 2
The video actually shows the launch of Sputnik-2.
DonPMitchell 2 years ago 4
Most of the "captured" German engineers by the Americans were better than the Soviet's "captured" German engineers. Also, to their credit, they admitted to getting their ideas from the American Robert Godard for innovating the idea of liquid propulsion and most of the methods used in their rocket designs: obtained from the details of his patent applications during the 1920's & 30's. The Soviets relied too heavily on solid propulsion.
UberSecret 3 years ago
I fail to understand how Americans claim victory in failure.
nthwool 3 years ago 2
Russian have beaten US comprehensively in space race..though Americans as usual claim victory even in defeat.Iraq..Afganistan..Vietnam and Korea are some examples.Russia has many firsts ..then why and how US is winner when even to this day Shuttles explode on re-entry and whole Apollo episodes is widely considered to be biggest lie in human history
gandaav4 3 years ago 2
I'm old enough to remember the folly that the Soviets had in Afghanistan. Nobody outside the realms of fantasy and denial land considers the Apollo moon landings a hoax. Please let us know about the total failure of the Soviet Mars program I would like to hear that, and tell us how many times did Mir catch fire?
SlightyDisturbedNBK 3 years ago
Only people dazzled by Americanism believe in their stunts.America needed to build creditworthiness by stunts like Apollo11 so that later it can spend its creditworthiness by just printing paper dollors in exchange for valuable goods and services from other hard working countries like india/china.While russians may not be holy cows..i give full credit to Russian space exploration compared American ones
gandaav4 3 years ago
Russia might have had a few 'firsts' but that was a long time ago, the Russian space program is a shadow of it's former self. The Soyuz module might be reliable but it's getting old very fast and sadly I don't think Vlad Putin is interested in getting it back to it's former glory. He is more interested in bullying the old Soviet sates and tweaking with the gas supply to Europe. So in the meantime I will look towards NASA, ESA and China/India for the next 'firsts'.
SlightyDisturbedNBK 3 years ago
that's why Russia was able to answer America and send a man to the moon...lolol
fireball897 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who said america sent man to moon?Its biggest lie in human history.Humans will simply get fried outside vanallen radiation belts and proved there is no techonology in 1960 or even today to protect from these belts unles u carry entire earth atmoshere with u
gandaav4 2 years ago
lol, then why does the scientific community still use data they brought back? All that hoax shit was a desperate commie attempt at propaganda because they failed. If it had been a hoax, the KGB would have truly known about it and the Russians would have done a hoax of their own in response.
fireball897 2 years ago
Comment removed
gandaav4 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russian sure wud done hoax of their own...man landing on moon never happened?It was real bullshit story.The communication remote sensing and material science techology has improved so many folds that if man cud go to moon then,we wud have watched a football match now happening on moon.But they never returned back after 1973 because it cant repeat the bullshit again and again.
gandaav4 2 years ago
man, that sux.
so, was really just a great american dream ;)) .
uyfguyfgvyti 2 years ago
America did go to the moon.
AMERICA sent samples of the moon all over the world for scientist to study. This includes russia.
Now the question is: If the American samples where not real, don't you think russia would have prove it by comparing the samples from the Luna missions?
Ask anyone from the Russian Federal Space Agency to the KGB and you shall learn the truth.
OF 400.000 people that were involved in the Apollo project, no one has come forward to say "it was fake". BUYAKASHA.
elpatriotaLX 2 years ago 2
Moon samples were claimed to be brought by both russia and america thru robotic missions.The question still remains is, whether man landed or not?My rational mind doesnt agree with all Circumstantial evidence available.
gandaav4 2 years ago
They sent about 0.5kg to the whole world. Very apreciated(sarcasm). Russia had same amount of samples from "Lunohod" program without sending people to the moon. Learn facts.
NDin89 2 years ago
OK, believe whatever you want. I know the facts you are talking about. Nothing to brag about.
Still, there is not concrete proof that man didn't go to the moon. Even if you argue other wise, you argument will always be refuted.
elpatriotaLX 2 years ago
Rlly? NASA hired a group of scientists and engineers back in 2002 to justify apollo missions. They failed. That's all. Google it.
NDin89 2 years ago
Comment removed
elpatriotaLX 2 years ago
This is the clincher that proves men landed on the moon. There are people everyday who are whistleblowers. Because there has never been a peep of someone mentioning it was never true, this should cast all doubts aside. Nicely said, ElpatriotaLX
danasteve524 2 years ago
The only sufficient evidence would be another man on the moon. Still NO ONE can go there. I can give you 500+ arguments against this landing, but that's pointless. You won't be able to counter them.
NDin89 2 years ago
Это первый человек в космосе!!!Больше первых не будет.
spurlos24rus 1 year ago
@NDin89 Give me 10 of the top ones and I'll counter them all.
xyzzykhk 1 year ago
@NDin89 well the soviets were trying REALLY hard to debunk the moon landing and they could find no evidence against it. Also it's been proved multiple times that it would be very difficult, especially back then, to create the movments that the astronouts made in the videos unless in a low gravity enviornmet. What if I said that I think that the launch of sputnik wasn't real do you have any evidence against it, I mean the sattelite itself could never be viewed from earth how do I know its real
graidstin 1 year ago
The russians sent luna 16, 20 and 24 to the moon and brought back moon soil without humans, they sent lunokhods 1 and 2 rovers, lunokhod 2 traveled 23 miles on the moon during it's mission, no other rover in history even comes close. what the americans did was just put a flag on the moon so they could brag about it, the russians did everything the americans did with robotic probes.
bombarderoazul 2 years ago
I don't mean to be rude of argue with you but: Didn't NASA sent 2 rovers to MARS? What do you mean by "no other rover in history even comes close"?
-If you mean distance... It could be.
-If you are implying that NASA is less capable than Russia, well you are wrong.
-Sending two rovers to MARS is quite of an achievement in its own right. NO OTHER ROVERS IN HISTORY EVEN COME CLOSE.
elpatriotaLX 2 years ago
actually yes, the soviet union rovers Lunokhod on the moon surface about 40 years ago? the true first moon landing was made by the soviet union in 1966.
darkalligator 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck the US and USSR! They couldn't even imagine about rockets without german engineers! USSR launched first rocket into the space only coz they kidnapped better engineers from germany!
IwantFreeBooze 3 years ago
spot on
hairyballsinurmouth 3 years ago
actually the R-7 was created by a russian called krolov it was the americans who used von braun an ex nazi to invent the jupiter missile which put the second satilite into space the explorer 1. so you are wrong
SAS2332 3 years ago
Well, I dont read Wikipedia 24/7
IwantFreeBooze 3 years ago
well what a crapy come back and wikipedia sucks m8
SAS2332 3 years ago
well no one gives a fuck about what you do
3ricjohnson 2 years ago
hey bitch, where do you think korolev got his ideas, he got them from Germans and claimed that they were his lol
fireball897 2 years ago
Our comrades won space race
somedude1939 3 years ago
Comment removed
Caesaurus 3 years ago 2
Too bad you cannot spell.
JaviarIV 3 years ago
(i am talking to you Caesaurus
JaviarIV 3 years ago
Actually the launch of Sputnik-2.
DonPMitchell 3 years ago
How long did it stays in orbit ?
Alexvideoclip 3 years ago
i think of aprox. 90 days
juancarlosbascu 3 years ago
It disintegrated on January 4, 1958.
Coastergeekperson04 3 years ago
@juancarlosbascu It burned as it came back into orbit on January 4th 1958 (2 years later). The battery lasted 22 days (more then the 2 weeks that were planned).
flyimgjohn 8 months ago
@Alexvideoclip
3 months, but it only transmited data for 22 days (the battery were expected to last only 14 days)
vava54own 1 year ago
that doesnt look like sputnik lol....
Hawkboy77 3 years ago
...and Saturn V looks nothing like Apollo either. Gee, I wonder why?
Coastergeekperson04 3 years ago
Nice man russian are sure smart first ones in space.
djsal510 3 years ago 11
Yep, they had a good lead and then lost it. Probably just couldn't keep up on the financing.
Jesusisyhwh 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hitler! stalin! putin! bush! is a childish gay, fooling all people..!!!russian, american, chinese, uk, muslim country, all world nuke? are weakling shit.!!! asteroid cannot blow up earth, comet&blackhole cannot destroy universe, new & old life forms still alive again.!!!
HOW WEAK..!!! ALL NUKES & WEAPONS OF HUMANS CANNOT EVEN DESTROY EARTH.. very very weak weapons..!!!
earth must be planted of super bomb also the universe must be destroyed...!!!
zudunow 4 years ago
Fuck you asshole
chivux 4 years ago 4
go 2 hell u bitch!!zudunow go blow urself up!!
drsheikhjunior 4 years ago
Umm, poor idea, you're just an idiot, and your grammar SUCKS.
SpartanQ77 4 years ago 5
Legal, video histórico!
Zen369369 4 years ago 4
I like this. this is an old school rocket blasting off into space from my home country!
Mikedrake 4 years ago 3
Sputnik 50 Anniversary, October 4
1957 - 2007
juancarlosbascu 4 years ago 7