People, you have to understand that the point of cover is not to compete with the original. It's a hommage to influence, to artist and to say that cover version is better then the original is really stupid. Kurt would be the first one to spit you in the face.
i still don't understand why the sax isn't used in the db version.
its a great line, whole different riff to the guitar line, memorable and catchy as it is and justifying its title as the worlds easiest lead solo... maybe he was selfconscious about it?
could have got andy mackay in if he was worried about blowing his own trumpet....can understand him not wanting to appear a blowhard
i still don't understand why the sax isn't used in the db version.
its a great line, whole different riff to the guitar line, memorable and catchy as it is and justifying its title as the worlds easiest lead solo... maybe he was selfconscious about it? could've got andy mackay in if he was worried about blowing his own trumpet....can understand him not wanting to appear a blowhard
The lyrics are also cited as reflecting Bowie's concerns with splintered or multiple personalities, and are believed to have been partially inspired by the poem "Antigonish" by William Hughes Mearns:
Why to compare cobain's song with bowie's. Both are good. You can have a moment where you want to listen to one and another moment the other one. Both are worth listening to, that's it.
if you like Kirks version better i suggest you listen to David singing it live. especially on the reality tour. He is amazing, and it's true, nothing beats the original.
i agree david bowie is amzing sos kurt cobain but its foolish to compare the two bowies is more artistic whilst cobains is more emotive and analogue so there basically two different songs
Because Kurt Cobain sings it in am american angsty way. David Bowie sings it refined and intellectually very hard to explain or see and understand but its outof this world.
thats really hard, they are both really good, david is good because of course it is the original but than again nirvana does an excellent job on reviving this song. if i had to chose, i would say nirvana b/c it is the first version i heard and to me that is he standard of this song. but i do very much like david bowie
Why would anyone care who's version is better? That's not what art is about at all. And David Bowie and Kurt Cobain were genuine artists in a genre where most of the people called "artists" are just performers. Not that there's anything wrong with being a performer . . . but let's just be clear about the whole thing.
Beyond this, the episode is unexplained: as James E. Perone wrote,
Bowie encounters the title character, but it is not clear just what the phrase means, or exactly who this man is. … The main thing that the song does is to paint — however elusively — the title character as another example of the societal outcasts who populate the album.
In common with a number of tracks on the album, the song's themes have been compared to the horror-fantasy works of H. P. Lovecraft.
my fave solo artist, a genius, well b4 his time legend, all his music is timeless, the very fact nirvana covered the song shows what an inspiration and how highly regarded he is!
props for nirvanas version because the singing in this one is hella weird and kurt cobain made it sound original/natural and like he made it. if i didnt know who made the song i wouldve thought it would be nirvana because bowies version sounds like it would be the cover.
The song's title is similar to that of Robert A. Heinlein's 1949 science fiction novella "The Man Who Sold the Moon", with which Bowie was familiar. However, the song has no similarities with the story of the book. The persona in the song has an encounter with a kind of doppelgänger, as is suggested in the second chorus where "I never lost control" is replaced with "We never lost control".
People, you have to understand that the point of cover is not to compete with the original. It's a hommage to influence, to artist and to say that cover version is better then the original is really stupid. Kurt would be the first one to spit you in the face.
sandelic1 1 week ago
Non esistono versioni migliori, questa canzone è: scritta , cantata, prodotta, interpretata, pensata, ideata, da Bowie ..
Michalkov81 3 weeks ago
Bowie el maestro, Cobain el aprendiz
hertrudis11 6 months ago 3
I'm out!
mrphJuice 6 months ago
The older I get the more this song means to me.
chongkina 6 months ago in playlist Eclectic bunch
Kurt Cobain loved David Bowie.
Shaftlenaze 6 months ago 2
Curt didn't do better... just a copy!
pheusromuald 6 months ago 2
I Prefer Cobain Version!
RedSunshineA 7 months ago
Both versions are great
BlueYoshiGamer 10 months ago 2
david bowie is the best!
tauro1730 11 months ago 2
I just Love it!!
zo0zo0ni1201mj 1 year ago
Bowie is a genius! Me gusta mucho la version de nirvana, pero bowie es un genio por haberla escrito :)
Deadmaumartyn 1 year ago
What is the name of that honeycomb looking percussion thing that's making that noise?
ComaAlpha 1 year ago
i still don't understand why the sax isn't used in the db version.
its a great line, whole different riff to the guitar line, memorable and catchy as it is and justifying its title as the worlds easiest lead solo... maybe he was selfconscious about it?
could have got andy mackay in if he was worried about blowing his own trumpet....can understand him not wanting to appear a blowhard
stevebobs 1 year ago
i still don't understand why the sax isn't used in the db version.
its a great line, whole different riff to the guitar line, memorable and catchy as it is and justifying its title as the worlds easiest lead solo... maybe he was selfconscious about it? could've got andy mackay in if he was worried about blowing his own trumpet....can understand him not wanting to appear a blowhard
stevebobs 1 year ago
The lyrics are also cited as reflecting Bowie's concerns with splintered or multiple personalities, and are believed to have been partially inspired by the poem "Antigonish" by William Hughes Mearns:
“ Last night I saw upon the stair
A little man who wasn’t there
He wasn’t there again today
Oh, how I wish he’d go away…”
Hacker73 4 months ago
@Hacker73 nice spamming of wikipedia there
MrNeekappa 1 week ago
I love this song.. it's great !!
angeobscure 1 year ago
NEVER FORGET THAT WITHOUT THIS ORIGINAL VERSION WE ALL CAN'T LISTEN THE NIRVANA'S ONE!!
kanulele 1 year ago
Bowie's version is 1000 times better than Nirvana's dreadful cover.Smacked out Kurt Cobain sound like his hemorrhoids are flaring up when he sings.
JOPAGalvin 2 years ago
las dos
es verdad
2 songs
perf
tropcis 2 years ago
Why to compare cobain's song with bowie's. Both are good. You can have a moment where you want to listen to one and another moment the other one. Both are worth listening to, that's it.
PatriceauQuebec 2 years ago 3
if you like Kirks version better i suggest you listen to David singing it live. especially on the reality tour. He is amazing, and it's true, nothing beats the original.
bellagilli 2 years ago 2
i agree david bowie is amzing sos kurt cobain but its foolish to compare the two bowies is more artistic whilst cobains is more emotive and analogue so there basically two different songs
MrMetalsoul666 2 years ago 3
well said
69michael1 1 year ago
Kurt you dumass, Kurt
daieohfreckoning 2 years ago 2
man , what is up with this version he sounds like he is on crack! kurts version is way better ! oh and lulu's version sucks
rockmusicisbest1 2 years ago
i dont really like david bowies way of singing it as kurt cobains way.
aov13 2 years ago
Because Kurt Cobain sings it in am american angsty way. David Bowie sings it refined and intellectually very hard to explain or see and understand but its outof this world.
DanBlabbers 2 years ago 22
Bowie es better than Cobain's cover
TobeDoss 2 years ago
nobody beats the original
RJERR 2 years ago 2
I agree, Kurt did an amazing job, but an original is an original!
Igniteanember 2 years ago
I like Nirvana and I like David Bowie, but I just prefer this version way more....but you just can't beat the original.
Poisonspoonful 2 years ago
I agree with you, but Franz ferdinand did a cover of womanizer by spears...soo yeah. Haha.
DanBlabbers 2 years ago
Cobain version is AWESOME !
elfidanto 2 years ago 20
I like David but Nirvana did a MUCH better version. plan and simple
MercyNotGvn 2 years ago 2
You don't like bowie enough to sell him out for a grunge band version.
DanBlabbers 2 years ago
he rocks but nirvana does the better version of this song
DegeonTheHegehog 2 years ago
I like Nirvana and Bowie, but Bowie's versions is the superior.
smoky289 2 years ago
thats really hard, they are both really good, david is good because of course it is the original but than again nirvana does an excellent job on reviving this song. if i had to chose, i would say nirvana b/c it is the first version i heard and to me that is he standard of this song. but i do very much like david bowie
brindiangonzalez 2 years ago
I always prefer Davids versions. They just become better when he adds himself to them. That's just me...or maybe you too.
naumnn 2 years ago
Why would anyone care who's version is better? That's not what art is about at all. And David Bowie and Kurt Cobain were genuine artists in a genre where most of the people called "artists" are just performers. Not that there's anything wrong with being a performer . . . but let's just be clear about the whole thing.
piemouth1 2 years ago
Beyond this, the episode is unexplained: as James E. Perone wrote,
Bowie encounters the title character, but it is not clear just what the phrase means, or exactly who this man is. … The main thing that the song does is to paint — however elusively — the title character as another example of the societal outcasts who populate the album.
In common with a number of tracks on the album, the song's themes have been compared to the horror-fantasy works of H. P. Lovecraft.
Hacker73 4 months ago
original version
MrBafanabafana 2 years ago
Bowie's better. It's not even a contest in my eyes. Then again, I've never liked Cobain. All a matter of personal viewpoints.
Barrettfloyd82 2 years ago
my fave solo artist, a genius, well b4 his time legend, all his music is timeless, the very fact nirvana covered the song shows what an inspiration and how highly regarded he is!
bigtimematty 2 years ago 2
Bowie's version of this song is better, more astral=)
radimsirl 2 years ago
props for nirvanas version because the singing in this one is hella weird and kurt cobain made it sound original/natural and like he made it. if i didnt know who made the song i wouldve thought it would be nirvana because bowies version sounds like it would be the cover.
nicksterba 2 years ago
This guy is sick, i used to find his songs stupid, but now i got into him. All thanks to a music project i had 2 do.
totallymetallica 2 years ago
Props to bowies song, He wrote it and created it. I enjoy Nirvanas take on it though.
MagusAugury 2 years ago
Bowie without a doubt. The man wrote it for Gods sake!
bewlay2 2 years ago
to be honest i just cannot decide. i would say there both the same . my fave part of this whole song is the second chorus... just thought id say lol
eternalXxXmemorys 2 years ago
The song's title is similar to that of Robert A. Heinlein's 1949 science fiction novella "The Man Who Sold the Moon", with which Bowie was familiar. However, the song has no similarities with the story of the book. The persona in the song has an encounter with a kind of doppelgänger, as is suggested in the second chorus where "I never lost control" is replaced with "We never lost control".
Hacker73 4 months ago