@Numanore And pray tell what device at the cost of $3 US could produce an EMP that would even be noticed by an average PC, let alone an advanced combat aircraft, that just like every other modern combat aircraft, has it's components shielded against electromagnetic interference (to an extent), be it a pulse or continuous exposure?
@Zaphodox Allow me to enlighten you. Shock wave generators are capable of producing focused acoustic or electromagnetic energy that can break up objects such as kidney stones and other similar materials. EMP generators can produce pulses of electromagnetic energy that can destroy the sensitive electronics in computers and microprocessors. Destabilized LCR circuits can produce multi megawatt pulses by using an explosive wire disruptive switch. In short troll better next time....your move cunt.
@Numanore Oh i am well aware of the process but I challange you to take out a UAV with an EMP blast generated from only $3 of equipment that was what I was getting at. And sorry i should not have called you retardo: It was rude of me. I was having a bad day (not that's any excuse).
@Zaphodox My apologies as well I do work for the military and was having a more than unsavory day as well it was very distasteful thing I wrote. While I was stationed in Iraq I had a chance to work with both the predator, reaper, RQ-7 shadow and the RQ-11 raven. While working with contractors I had the opportunity to test the tolerances of each machine. oddly enough 3 $1 disp camera flash capacitors proved sufficient enough when electricity was applied through a copper wire.
@Numanore Ahh okay so if you could sabotage the units and place your $3 caps in the housing of the craft, but to take one out with a targetted EMP from the ground would require a significant investment ;)
I work as an engineer at a ground station, so was thinking in terms of 4πr^2 from a point source at a distance hence my incredulity!
Fascinating information, thank you for sharing ^_^
However this method was more effective at closer ranges than at further ranges. However if you were going to attack these vehicles you would do it on the ground as the ceiling for these UAV's is rather high. Being challenged aside I have already proven that it does work and yes it can be done for $3 (you don't pay tax for things bought on a base so outside of a base maybe $5 with tax)
This has got to be the coolest promo (for an Unpiloted Combat Air Vehicle) I've ever seen, the music makes it - surprisingly evocative tune, good one there Northrop Grumman.
Sweet. First its remote planes, next remote tanks, then remote ships/sub. Keep playing those video games kids! They just may land you a career with the military!
Well said rector and taxxbad is unfortunately coreect. The constiution should not forbid sepration of Church and State as that is effeictvely TRYING TO DENY God as the ultimate authroity which he is
@HolyRevan are we in their country raping their women or do they have troops and bases and tanks and airfields in our country? if we wanted we could just nuke all of the ragheads ;)
N.G ON THE SHITTY SIDE OF THE DEAL< NICE PARTNER N.G Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich and others, heads the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the hearings will look into "the propriety of the procurement process of the KC-X tanker blast us law makers for betrayal and out sorcing america
THE NEW ERA IN AVIATION STARTED in ISRAEL with FIRST-EVER flight of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV]. (May 18, 1987, Av. Week). Facebook video ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains Super-Kill-Ratio, Extra TO/L-safety (Civil & military) gained by STV, thereby ending dominance of common stall/spin dangerous aero-control. F-35 & F-22 exploit only part of STV potential [tailless= better stealth, reduced drag/structure/weight/fuel). Cf. X44 MANTA, X47b, RQ170, T50, B2, NGB, FB22, X-48B,C; X-727
esto no es la falsificación y no está en el empleo en afghanistan. que ellos son en el desarrollo. DARPA ponen los objetivos y hay dos competidores. Si todavía conducen el proyecto delante no sé(conozco) debido a la crisis eco y los cambios políticos de nosotros.
it´s not fake and it´s not in use in afghanistan. they are under development. DARPA set the goals and there are two competitors. If the project is still driven ahead i don´t know because of the eco crisis and the political changes in us.
No, they still have the green-light. The X-47B was spotted on a US Aircraft Carrier last month. It didn't land on it however, that won't happen until December - Feburary of this year and beginning 2011.
As far as the other plane, the X-45C, it is still under development, and will fly this summer. If excepted, it will be a UCAV for the USAF.
As I have already said, the F-22/35 will be the last manned fighter for the U.S. The UCAV's are superior in soooo many ways.
@thewallstreetwarrior Ya, last figures I saw on the X-47 maneuverability studies was G-loading in excess of 50 G's. Most air to air missiles cannot pull more than 40 G's without bleeding drastic amounts of energy!
@espido Yes i know, i mean US is famous for taking German nazi or Russian scientist and tech to theyr projects. cuz rednecks don't do shit. just macDonalds and cancer.
All this stuff is useless without accurate, timely intelligence, and the right strategy! I say America needs to work more on those more important aspects that on these things. Being techno-savy does not necessarily translate to victory in war.
Just imagine these planes leading a flight of F-35s (and on the AF side, the X-45 leading F-22s) into battle! America is always one small step ahead, but now we're a giant leap ahead of any enemy.
Can any nation other than America even comprhend trillions of dollars? That's what our economy equates to. It isn't unusual for a person making $40k to be in debt to the tune of $100k for a home mortgage because he has the wherewithal to honor it. No different for America. We command those astronomical figures because that's what we're made of. And no, Russia hasn't beaten anyone. In addition to being financially bankrupt, it's been spiritually bankrupt even longer than that!!
@RushProbeSix You may be over exaggerating, it is Amercia that has not beaten anyone! wheras Russia might be the only one to have beaten a lot of countries in technology and many other ways. Bankrupcy didnt take place in Russia for as long as it lives, but the countries that have decided they can cope by them selfes and left the Soviet Union are Bankrupt because Russia isnt backing them up anymore for example one of those countries is Ukrania!
@RushProbeSix Well, America has surely shown what it means to lose trillions of dollars... Financial chaos, the result of trillions of dollars managed by all those American super traders and mortgage wizards. And to answer your question: no other country feels the need to understand... try understanding proportionality. Having visited Russia, something you obvioulsy haven't, I can tell you it isn't spiritually bankrupt. I'd say America is morally bankrupt, but I'll have to visit it to be sure.
@123SupArman123 per capita USA is wealthier then the UN by ALLOT. The only nations in Europe wealthier then America per capita are luxemburg and Norway; both nations are so small and insignificant that the world wouldnt notice their disapearance. US economy is also more stable then any European nation, the rishest of them being Germany with a $3 trillion economy, USA in the other hand is almost $15 trillion... Finally, USA culture is risher & more diverce then the continent of Europe [FACT].
@prjerry7 "Finally, USA culture is risher & more diverce then the continent of Europe"
Ahah, Usa is 235 years old, with a major english culture. France, italie, germany and many other country in europe have more than 2000 years history. Fact.
@WarWolfs Tell me, what does 2,000 year old history have to do with culture? Do Europeans still draw on caves? No. Your history has been replaced by the American history, which is the movie theater, an advanced capitalistic system, American music genres [hip hop, techno, rock, metal, soul, jazz] etc. The reason I say our history is richer is because we have European, African, Asian and unique American history all in one, that’s America baby
@prjerry7 True, I admit:I love the american movies, produced by your advanced 'capitalistic' system: these are the ones I prefer: Fahrenheit 9/11, Sicko, Loose change, Bowling for Columbine etc
@RushProbeSix What are you talking about, "spiritually bankrupt"? The US has never been a "Christian nation" any more than we have been a "Caucasian nation".
@Izzbadd And despite the overwhelming majority of Christians in America, the First Amendment still separates religion from the government. Besides that, the amendment is incongruous with the first commandment in the Bible.
@SirRhetor You should do your history homework, The US was 97% Christian when it was founded. Its doctrine echoes in the Bill of RIghts and the Constitution.
@Izzbadd Yeah those were the last real Christians. Now they're a lot of Jersey Shore anti-community work, anti-social service a-holes. People should read what they wrote on the top of the Boston Public Library
And I'm sure we can stretch the truth to say the Bible "echos" in the American Constitution. However, an influence it was not. If you're looking for influence, check out Hobbs or Locke, two men who came up with philosophies Jesus wouldn't have dreamt of, and which were of true utility in founding a government. The Founders were influenced more by the Roman Republic than the primitive government of the Israelites.
@RushProbeSix Sorry to burst your arrogant bubble but the reason is not because Us citizens are honourable. That's ridiculous. The USA controls the global international trade system via the US$ the IMF and effective control of the world bank.
Oh and by the way - Russia is not bankrupt! Russia is one of the few countries in the world in the black without a national debt. Now the USA however was bankrupt a long long time ago, the rest of the world has just not realised it yet. Wake up.
I'm sorry i just can't get the sycophantic arrogance out of my mind. Russia has not beaten anyone? Wha? It's won far more wars than your lot. Hell it beat the stuffing out of just about everyone in the last 500 years. Spiritually bankrupt? Coming from the land of freedom fries and hillbillies that's rich.
Oh wait you have the faux c hristians from the middle states! Oh yeah now that is real spiritual bankruptcy.
@RushProbeSix There are some serious flaws in your statement. 1 our economy equates to a flaming bag of shit just a step shy from a front door 2. An American having honor to pay a debt? I think your may be thinking of the 0.001% who actually pay debt off rather than try to snake a way out of it 3. We command nothing as our debts are owned by foreign interest and thus can be called in at any time basically were made of nothing. Financially and spiritually I can agree on.
I taught maintenance and pilot fam courses on the F4 from 1965-'68 and '70-72. And the APCS (auto throttle) and ACLS (auto carrier landing system) was being implemented and used then. Long before fly-by-wire which is used in todays aircraft. Pilot's didn't like it because they wanted control BUT it has been successfully used to improve carrier landings for many years.
This aircraft. even though some of this video was computer graphics, is surely capable of what they say.
hey redraider1 - we have had the capability to land on carriers via computer link since before I retired in 1978 from USS DWIGHT D EISENHOWER (CVN-69) . Pilots are just about a thing of the past. They are no longer able to keep up with the modern aircraft capabilities because of g forces - soon they will be sitting somewhere faaaarrrrrr from the action.
wow...i would love to see a computer capable of landing an aircraft on a pitching deck at night. im sorry but i dont think technology has come that far yet. in the end this is just going to be a colassal waste of money better spent on upgrading the navy's aging fighter fleet.
Almost feel sorry for the pilots at the Airforce Academy. Instead of flying around in the best 2 fighters in the world (22/35), they will be playing video game wars, flying these babies around with X-Box controllers in an air-conditioned room.
This was photoshopped, with the landing, they replaced the F-14 with this J-UCAS. I can tell, I've seen the same guy on the telephone like thing or radio from F-14 vids.
Well, that specific guy was part of the VF-84 Fighter Squadron called the Jolly Rogers. You can see it on his jacket. They flew the F-14s. Also, notice that the aircraft was landing on an aircraft carrier full of Navy Tomcats. They have been retired from the United States Navy for about 3 years now. My point is, they replaced the F-14 in that footage and put the X-47B. Of course, I know there is a telephone guy during every landing.
I wonder how many of these have been mis-identified as UFO's, they are flying over Afghanistan right now. Which means that for between 2 and 9 yrs (when they started to develop them) they may have been tested over home territory. they really do look like saucers from the side view, and triangles from the front.
Anyone with any sufficient amount of braincell activity would know that i didn't mean they where fully operational there, but they have been seen in and around Afghanistan, any prototype would have to be brought into the theatre of war to see how it fares. plus i've read somewhere that there's problems they encounter in Afghanistan they don't encounter anywhere else, so it would be logical they would be brought in for at least a couple of flights, even if it's just flight & refuelling tests.
Anyone with two neurons to rub together can see through your idiocy. The thing isn't even at the flight test stage, and development is done in the States, so it's never been in Afghanistan in the first place. You're trying to bluster your way out of your own ignorance with more ignorance, and that just doesn't wash with people who actually know what they're talking about.
Im not arguing with you, you've obviously constructed a model Harrier jump jet at home and therefore know everything about aviation. "The x-47b isn't even at flight test stage", "Officially" Northrop Grumman provided 3 demonstrator UCAVs for operational assessment in 2007, that means they were without autonomous control systems and weapons, but still flying about, proving they could loiter and fly long distances, but we all know about the years of secrecy before there shown off to the world.
Not sure they'll actually let it land on a carrier automated they might not even allow it remote controlled and instead might have it use a parachute for recovery and have a helicopter grab it mid air.
It will not use any parachute recovery system, the onboard computer will designate and asses all atmospheric, and surface variables during self-automated take-off and landing.
uavs have their place because they can fly a long time, like 50 hours at a time as opposed to 10 or so like an fa-18. When the uavs have done their job, the fa-18s can go mop up the job and be sure that it's done.
OK dork, shooting down a predator that is just meant to have long endurance and is prop driven isn't the same as shooting down a stealth aircraft powered by a jet engine. This is smaller (smaller rcs also) than a fighter and has a smaller heat signature. These are exactly what to send against sam sites.
Do you really think global events that can have far reaching consequences will be solved with a friendly game of robotic warfare? It won't. Ever. People will always die in war. Who do you think is going to be controlling those UAV's and unmanned robots? Humans. And so they will become a target. And whose going to take care of those robots on a moving front? Humans. And that will make them a target. Computers are FAR from being self-aware.
FAKE
fredericoschultz 1 week ago
fake!
fredericoschultz 1 week ago
Look's like the one the Iranians put their hands on. Now imagine this thing bombing the US troops wherever they are... Ahahaha Divine Justice.
Louaner 3 weeks ago
Now you know where UFO's come from.
ntt688 4 weeks ago in playlist Military
@ntt688 Now you know where we got this technology from. UFO's!
KillaVinyl 3 weeks ago
Still, the coolest aircraft I ever seen was the SR-71 taking off at Offutt AFB in Nebraska in 1976. B-52 was cool. SR-71 was AWESOME!
chriswarren44 1 month ago
It just weird seeing something like that flying since it so thin.It kool
StackRiteAimStr8 1 month ago
My daddy works at Area 51 and he took me into the Mothership and touched my no no place
WalterJamesComedy 1 month ago
i got to see this up at eduwars air force base befor it flew and i saw 2 flight and my dad works on this program at morthrop grumman so ha
skylor98 4 months ago
@skylor98 In the great words of, The Rock, "Ït doesn't matter", my daddy is still better :D
SupaPoopaScoopa 2 months ago
OK YOU HAVE TINGN IT AS SEE WATER LIKE SPACE OK
Hardcore1969 6 months ago
@Hardcore1969 ...What?
WhyDidIJustEatThat 5 months ago
То, что становится беспилотным, теряет трудовые ресурсы в ближайшем будущем.
minionarcane 7 months ago
Awesome its unmanned!.... got to love its sole weakness is an emp blast which you can make for $3 great design retards.
Numanore 7 months ago
@Numanore And pray tell what device at the cost of $3 US could produce an EMP that would even be noticed by an average PC, let alone an advanced combat aircraft, that just like every other modern combat aircraft, has it's components shielded against electromagnetic interference (to an extent), be it a pulse or continuous exposure?
Synthmilk 6 months ago
@Numanore ohh how is that retardo?
Zaphodox 6 months ago
@Zaphodox Allow me to enlighten you. Shock wave generators are capable of producing focused acoustic or electromagnetic energy that can break up objects such as kidney stones and other similar materials. EMP generators can produce pulses of electromagnetic energy that can destroy the sensitive electronics in computers and microprocessors. Destabilized LCR circuits can produce multi megawatt pulses by using an explosive wire disruptive switch. In short troll better next time....your move cunt.
Numanore 6 months ago
@Numanore Oh i am well aware of the process but I challange you to take out a UAV with an EMP blast generated from only $3 of equipment that was what I was getting at. And sorry i should not have called you retardo: It was rude of me. I was having a bad day (not that's any excuse).
Zaphodox 6 months ago
@Zaphodox My apologies as well I do work for the military and was having a more than unsavory day as well it was very distasteful thing I wrote. While I was stationed in Iraq I had a chance to work with both the predator, reaper, RQ-7 shadow and the RQ-11 raven. While working with contractors I had the opportunity to test the tolerances of each machine. oddly enough 3 $1 disp camera flash capacitors proved sufficient enough when electricity was applied through a copper wire.
Numanore 6 months ago
@Numanore Ahh okay so if you could sabotage the units and place your $3 caps in the housing of the craft, but to take one out with a targetted EMP from the ground would require a significant investment ;)
I work as an engineer at a ground station, so was thinking in terms of 4πr^2 from a point source at a distance hence my incredulity!
Fascinating information, thank you for sharing ^_^
Zaphodox 6 months ago
@Zaphodox oh hell no lol in order to hit them at altitude would require some serious hardware and funding.
Numanore 6 months ago
However this method was more effective at closer ranges than at further ranges. However if you were going to attack these vehicles you would do it on the ground as the ceiling for these UAV's is rather high. Being challenged aside I have already proven that it does work and yes it can be done for $3 (you don't pay tax for things bought on a base so outside of a base maybe $5 with tax)
Numanore 6 months ago
Who gives a rat's ass about unmanned combat vehicles? Where's the glory in that? Fuck them. The government will probably turn them on us anyway.
JetMechMA 7 months ago
All CGI.
thedavidwilson 8 months ago
This has got to be the coolest promo (for an Unpiloted Combat Air Vehicle) I've ever seen, the music makes it - surprisingly evocative tune, good one there Northrop Grumman.
Veldtian1 10 months ago
looks impressive, does it work? or is it just propaganda for millitary industry greetings M
chielsteel 10 months ago
@chielsteel its already been test flown
prjerry7 6 months ago
Sweet. First its remote planes, next remote tanks, then remote ships/sub. Keep playing those video games kids! They just may land you a career with the military!
Cinthorc 10 months ago 2
Well said rector and taxxbad is unfortunately coreect. The constiution should not forbid sepration of Church and State as that is effeictvely TRYING TO DENY God as the ultimate authroity which he is
7nordic 11 months ago
@7nordic Prove it.
Synthmilk 6 months ago
when am i see a i with 2 dots and then >> and a upside down ? after some words in the comments?
Randomizer77 11 months ago
Comment removed
m3nzo 11 months ago
unmanned stealth fighters > stealth fighters
WavesOfTrolls 1 year ago
nice music.
UNlTE 1 year ago
You may have most advanced technology, but u still can't win against half naked talibans with soviet RPG-40 from ww2.
HolyRevan 1 year ago
@HolyRevan are we in their country raping their women or do they have troops and bases and tanks and airfields in our country? if we wanted we could just nuke all of the ragheads ;)
sazhawk 11 months ago
@sazhawk George Washington wore a rag on his head, and so did the other founders. Along with fake teeth.
colddietcoke 11 months ago
EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC EPiC
iNFireX 1 year ago
Northrup Grumman Defining the future.... and blowing the crap outta' your truck.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Welcome to the future of air warfare.....completely unmanned....
sparkdog44 1 year ago
4500 lb ordinance!
BeantownJim 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ipwnboobz 1 year ago
Pro !!!
thanhtunglx98 1 year ago
I'd love to see a comparison between this and the British BAE Taranis.
twiddlemyfiddle 1 year ago
None of that is real....
diabloho 1 year ago
FMD.EYE
1:04 .9-H
FMD.EYE
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
N.G ON THE SHITTY SIDE OF THE DEAL< NICE PARTNER N.G Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich and others, heads the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the hearings will look into "the propriety of the procurement process of the KC-X tanker blast us law makers for betrayal and out sorcing america
hotrod4you2 1 year ago
So that's the odd looking stealth bomber that was shown in the movie Skyline.
n3rdbear 1 year ago
Europe is great we have free and private healthcare systems USA nooooooooo,
I think that you guys have to go to Canada to buy your medicines.
igorberri23 1 year ago
@igorberri23 actually its the other way around, canadians come to US to get healthcare because they have to wait in Canada.
HawkXe 1 year ago
If this is the stuff america is showing just think what about the stuff the america military isn't showing
Trey21aa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE NEW ERA IN AVIATION STARTED in ISRAEL with FIRST-EVER flight of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV]. (May 18, 1987, Av. Week). Facebook video ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains Super-Kill-Ratio, Extra TO/L-safety (Civil & military) gained by STV, thereby ending dominance of common stall/spin dangerous aero-control. F-35 & F-22 exploit only part of STV potential [tailless= better stealth, reduced drag/structure/weight/fuel). Cf. X44 MANTA, X47b, RQ170, T50, B2, NGB, FB22, X-48B,C; X-727
1Bengalor 1 year ago
Comment removed
1Bengalor 1 year ago
Comment removed
1Bengalor 1 year ago
lockhed martin,Northrop Grumman...
all awesome company!
coolglock19 1 year ago
beautiful!!
ntt688 1 year ago
this shit is fake fool
2020starman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are inhumane murderer who cowardlyattack in an ambush !
muthich 1 year ago
thats looks very very stealthy
Conservativepacheat 1 year ago
whats with the gay music?
abhiginimav 1 year ago
esto no es la falsificación y no está en el empleo en afghanistan. que ellos son en el desarrollo. DARPA ponen los objetivos y hay dos competidores. Si todavía conducen el proyecto delante no sé(conozco) debido a la crisis eco y los cambios políticos de nosotros.
monitogonza 1 year ago
it´s not fake and it´s not in use in afghanistan. they are under development. DARPA set the goals and there are two competitors. If the project is still driven ahead i don´t know because of the eco crisis and the political changes in us.
Tintifax84 2 years ago
Israel already has them.
dymproductions 1 year ago
@dymproductions currently, the United States is the only country to have Stealth capible ucav
YaJvkYa 1 year ago
@YaJvkYa wrong, israel has them but, it just can't land in there own carriers because they don't have.
dymproductions 1 year ago
@Tintifax84
No, they still have the green-light. The X-47B was spotted on a US Aircraft Carrier last month. It didn't land on it however, that won't happen until December - Feburary of this year and beginning 2011.
As far as the other plane, the X-45C, it is still under development, and will fly this summer. If excepted, it will be a UCAV for the USAF.
As I have already said, the F-22/35 will be the last manned fighter for the U.S. The UCAV's are superior in soooo many ways.
thewallstreetwarrior 1 year ago
@thewallstreetwarrior Ya, last figures I saw on the X-47 maneuverability studies was G-loading in excess of 50 G's. Most air to air missiles cannot pull more than 40 G's without bleeding drastic amounts of energy!
sakoshooter48 1 year ago
They dropped a few projects like the F-22 Raptor. But, I think this is still funded. But again, Russia has it's own line of UCAVs.
pogularocky 1 year ago
we are currently building another global hawk in san diego waiting to see if bams will ever come to production as well as this ucas.
ht3oldnavy 2 years ago
Nice video...but the music is about as cheesy as Wisconsin cheddar!!
ryanspeed 2 years ago
Currently in action over Afghanistan
megeralara02 2 years ago
i work on the test program. This vehicle is not in action anywhere. It has barely made its first taxi runs at Palmdale.
gk10002000 2 years ago
@megeralara02
No, that is the Polcat UAV flying over Afgan.
thewallstreetwarrior 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
omg one more 3D Max fake.....
no technology but a lot of comp generated video
emmetoya 2 years ago
you fail man...this plane is for real..
ddk6666 2 years ago 2
Fake
wbeejay 2 years ago
@wbeejay
"no shit"
chambitore 2 years ago
US technology, fucking awesome!!!
Laranzava 2 years ago 27
@Laranzava damn just god bless america!! and USAF!!YEAHHHH
coolglock19 1 year ago
@Laranzava no, no, no, no, US dollars aand German or Russian TEch.
espido 1 year ago
@espido Northrop Grumman is an American company. not german or russian.
HawkXe 1 year ago
@espido Yes i know, i mean US is famous for taking German nazi or Russian scientist and tech to theyr projects. cuz rednecks don't do shit. just macDonalds and cancer.
espido 1 year ago
@espido Dominican republic is awesome!!! Its a place a Russian, American,or a Nazi can go to feel smart..
alexisawsomeya 1 year ago
@alexisawsomeya yep we got beauiful beaches for that!
espido 1 year ago
@Laranzava
it's a shame that china would just imitate it within 5 years and with a lowered cost
etismyname 1 year ago
@etismyname Na America's gonna build a better prototype perhaps X-50 before them so nothing to worry about :P
ninjawux 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@etismyname
Thats why they are pirates
Izzbadd 11 months ago
@etismyname Yeah and lower quality
Laranzava 11 months ago
looks similar to UK planned Taranis
UKCallum1 2 years ago
patient since 1991 when ummm u collapsed. hmmmmm.
destind99 2 years ago
All this stuff is useless without accurate, timely intelligence, and the right strategy! I say America needs to work more on those more important aspects that on these things. Being techno-savy does not necessarily translate to victory in war.
fanofrhymeswithstar 2 years ago
you need that anyway bring on the techo savy
datzfast 2 years ago
it certainly helps. more than... any other aspect?
amh5034 2 years ago
Comment removed
fanofrhymeswithstar 2 years ago
Just imagine these planes leading a flight of F-35s (and on the AF side, the X-45 leading F-22s) into battle! America is always one small step ahead, but now we're a giant leap ahead of any enemy.
TonyN737 2 years ago 3
you are ahead, but you have trillions of dollars of debt and possibly a country about to collapse. so the russians beat you just by being patient.
troglodyte3344 2 years ago
Can any nation other than America even comprhend trillions of dollars? That's what our economy equates to. It isn't unusual for a person making $40k to be in debt to the tune of $100k for a home mortgage because he has the wherewithal to honor it. No different for America. We command those astronomical figures because that's what we're made of. And no, Russia hasn't beaten anyone. In addition to being financially bankrupt, it's been spiritually bankrupt even longer than that!!
RushProbeSix 2 years ago 14
@RushProbeSix: are you really making the statement that Russia is spiritually bankrupt?
yourJettison 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix in lyxemburg debt per capita is 4 million dollars :D :D :D
and in englad more then 200k : )
donzaliko 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix You may be over exaggerating, it is Amercia that has not beaten anyone! wheras Russia might be the only one to have beaten a lot of countries in technology and many other ways. Bankrupcy didnt take place in Russia for as long as it lives, but the countries that have decided they can cope by them selfes and left the Soviet Union are Bankrupt because Russia isnt backing them up anymore for example one of those countries is Ukrania!
hom3R1000 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix Well, America has surely shown what it means to lose trillions of dollars... Financial chaos, the result of trillions of dollars managed by all those American super traders and mortgage wizards. And to answer your question: no other country feels the need to understand... try understanding proportionality. Having visited Russia, something you obvioulsy haven't, I can tell you it isn't spiritually bankrupt. I'd say America is morally bankrupt, but I'll have to visit it to be sure.
VUO4E 1 year ago
@VUO4E No need... I'll tell you that it is morally bankrupt over here... well not everyone...
drenajunkie 1 year ago
@VUO4E I'm sure we don't want your visit. Keep your change at home so your pups can look forward to an inheritance when you pop your clogs. :o)
RushProbeSix 1 year ago
@VUO4E And please learn how to spell "obviously".
RushProbeSix 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix are you an idiot any european country is in better shape wealth wise then the US your a fuckin idiot daily you dont know shit
123SupArman123 1 year ago
@123SupArman123 per capita USA is wealthier then the UN by ALLOT. The only nations in Europe wealthier then America per capita are luxemburg and Norway; both nations are so small and insignificant that the world wouldnt notice their disapearance. US economy is also more stable then any European nation, the rishest of them being Germany with a $3 trillion economy, USA in the other hand is almost $15 trillion... Finally, USA culture is risher & more diverce then the continent of Europe [FACT].
prjerry7 1 year ago
@prjerry7 "Finally, USA culture is risher & more diverce then the continent of Europe"
Ahah, Usa is 235 years old, with a major english culture. France, italie, germany and many other country in europe have more than 2000 years history. Fact.
WarWolfs 1 year ago
@WarWolfs Tell me, what does 2,000 year old history have to do with culture? Do Europeans still draw on caves? No. Your history has been replaced by the American history, which is the movie theater, an advanced capitalistic system, American music genres [hip hop, techno, rock, metal, soul, jazz] etc. The reason I say our history is richer is because we have European, African, Asian and unique American history all in one, that’s America baby
prjerry7 1 year ago
@prjerry7 True, I admit:I love the american movies, produced by your advanced 'capitalistic' system: these are the ones I prefer: Fahrenheit 9/11, Sicko, Loose change, Bowling for Columbine etc
VUO4E 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix If the US doesn't get its act together in the next 10 years, its economy will be its destruction. And I can guarantee that.
BLblaman 1 year ago
@BLblaman I lol'd.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix
China. China. oh and China. they own the US nowadays. Spiritually bankrupt? whats that?
scarface8999 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix Russia has no need to go to war when they have Topol-M's.....
cyber8000 1 year ago
@RushProbeSix What are you talking about, "spiritually bankrupt"? The US has never been a "Christian nation" any more than we have been a "Caucasian nation".
SirRhetor 1 year ago
@SirRhetor You should do your history, The US was 97% Christian when it was founded. Its doctrine echoes in the Bill of RIghts and the Constitution.
Izzbadd 11 months ago
@Izzbadd And despite the overwhelming majority of Christians in America, the First Amendment still separates religion from the government. Besides that, the amendment is incongruous with the first commandment in the Bible.
SirRhetor 11 months ago
@SirRhetor You should do your history homework, The US was 97% Christian when it was founded. Its doctrine echoes in the Bill of RIghts and the Constitution.
Izzbadd 11 months ago
@Izzbadd Yeah those were the last real Christians. Now they're a lot of Jersey Shore anti-community work, anti-social service a-holes. People should read what they wrote on the top of the Boston Public Library
colddietcoke 11 months ago
@Izzbadd I feel like you just said that.
And I'm sure we can stretch the truth to say the Bible "echos" in the American Constitution. However, an influence it was not. If you're looking for influence, check out Hobbs or Locke, two men who came up with philosophies Jesus wouldn't have dreamt of, and which were of true utility in founding a government. The Founders were influenced more by the Roman Republic than the primitive government of the Israelites.
SirRhetor 11 months ago
@RushProbeSix Sorry to burst your arrogant bubble but the reason is not because Us citizens are honourable. That's ridiculous. The USA controls the global international trade system via the US$ the IMF and effective control of the world bank.
Oh and by the way - Russia is not bankrupt! Russia is one of the few countries in the world in the black without a national debt. Now the USA however was bankrupt a long long time ago, the rest of the world has just not realised it yet. Wake up.
Zaphodox 6 months ago
I'm sorry i just can't get the sycophantic arrogance out of my mind. Russia has not beaten anyone? Wha? It's won far more wars than your lot. Hell it beat the stuffing out of just about everyone in the last 500 years. Spiritually bankrupt? Coming from the land of freedom fries and hillbillies that's rich.
Oh wait you have the faux c hristians from the middle states! Oh yeah now that is real spiritual bankruptcy.
Zaphodox 6 months ago
@RushProbeSix There are some serious flaws in your statement. 1 our economy equates to a flaming bag of shit just a step shy from a front door 2. An American having honor to pay a debt? I think your may be thinking of the 0.001% who actually pay debt off rather than try to snake a way out of it 3. We command nothing as our debts are owned by foreign interest and thus can be called in at any time basically were made of nothing. Financially and spiritually I can agree on.
Numanore 6 months ago
debt? to who we print the money didnt you get the memo
Finalfire9 2 years ago
I taught maintenance and pilot fam courses on the F4 from 1965-'68 and '70-72. And the APCS (auto throttle) and ACLS (auto carrier landing system) was being implemented and used then. Long before fly-by-wire which is used in todays aircraft. Pilot's didn't like it because they wanted control BUT it has been successfully used to improve carrier landings for many years.
This aircraft. even though some of this video was computer graphics, is surely capable of what they say.
ohfaht USMC Aviation
ohfaht 2 years ago
that music ftw
devilsen64 2 years ago
1:01..hm..nd
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
this the future - stealth uav bombing and shooting down fighters - awesome power
6308281 2 years ago
hey redraider1 - we have had the capability to land on carriers via computer link since before I retired in 1978 from USS DWIGHT D EISENHOWER (CVN-69) . Pilots are just about a thing of the past. They are no longer able to keep up with the modern aircraft capabilities because of g forces - soon they will be sitting somewhere faaaarrrrrr from the action.
TheGaboonviper 2 years ago
wow...i would love to see a computer capable of landing an aircraft on a pitching deck at night. im sorry but i dont think technology has come that far yet. in the end this is just going to be a colassal waste of money better spent on upgrading the navy's aging fighter fleet.
reddraider1 2 years ago
GOD BLESS AMERICA and lead the force into the new age!
Command Respect With SUPERIOR Force!
dangerousdingos 2 years ago
what a stupid video. a fully crappy 3d of a lame plane and then...it launches a bomb! wow! bush is gone...let dead dogs lie.
DJCooper 2 years ago
Almost feel sorry for the pilots at the Airforce Academy. Instead of flying around in the best 2 fighters in the world (22/35), they will be playing video game wars, flying these babies around with X-Box controllers in an air-conditioned room.
legacyfinancial 2 years ago
Comment removed
legacyfinancial 2 years ago
whats the name for the f-14. i mean like the f-15 egal or f-16 raptor + the x-47b is rated as number 1 on ultumite wepons on military channle.
Randomizer77 2 years ago
F-14 Tomcat
F-15 Eagle
F-16 Falcon
F-18 Hornet
F-22 Raptor
F-35 Lightning II
dmillhoff 2 years ago
@dmillhoff We generally refer to the F-35 as the JSF here in Naval Aviation
joescape 11 months ago
i live literally right by northrop in lancaster ca. its pretty intresting to watch out my window at night and see what flies by. =]
justingross9 2 years ago
Gasy music
rggfgjerjh 2 years ago
I meant gay
rggfgjerjh 2 years ago
Even the F-35 and F-22 will fear this robotic war machines. The UAVs, UCAVs and other robotic combatant is the future for the military.
...
chuckshissle 2 years ago
This was photoshopped, with the landing, they replaced the F-14 with this J-UCAS. I can tell, I've seen the same guy on the telephone like thing or radio from F-14 vids.
undertake782 2 years ago 2
The guy with the telephone-like headset has nothing to do with F-14's. You'll see him around any time ANY aircraft is landing on the deck.
dmillhoff 2 years ago
Well, that specific guy was part of the VF-84 Fighter Squadron called the Jolly Rogers. You can see it on his jacket. They flew the F-14s. Also, notice that the aircraft was landing on an aircraft carrier full of Navy Tomcats. They have been retired from the United States Navy for about 3 years now. My point is, they replaced the F-14 in that footage and put the X-47B. Of course, I know there is a telephone guy during every landing.
undertake782 2 years ago
hay tomcats are esay planes to fly but the blue angle team is better
Randomizer77 2 years ago
they havent really put it on a carriers deck. it is to hard for the computers in side it to land it perfectly. you know its unmanned right?
+ the super hornet or the f-16 raptor is what is on a carrier now. or f-15 egal
Randomizer77 2 years ago
The F-16 and the "Raptor" are com[pletely different, unrelated aircraft. The F-16 is not carrier-capable.
Carrier tests are still a couple of years off.
dmillhoff 2 years ago
Hahahahaha!
joescape 11 months ago
I wonder how many of these have been mis-identified as UFO's, they are flying over Afghanistan right now. Which means that for between 2 and 9 yrs (when they started to develop them) they may have been tested over home territory. they really do look like saucers from the side view, and triangles from the front.
DJCUK77 2 years ago
ur right
Freebird101st 2 years ago 2
The "X"means "Experimental, bozo. Experimental means it's not operational, which means it has never been used or seen in Afghanistan.
dmillhoff 2 years ago
Anyone with any sufficient amount of braincell activity would know that i didn't mean they where fully operational there, but they have been seen in and around Afghanistan, any prototype would have to be brought into the theatre of war to see how it fares. plus i've read somewhere that there's problems they encounter in Afghanistan they don't encounter anywhere else, so it would be logical they would be brought in for at least a couple of flights, even if it's just flight & refuelling tests.
DJCUK77 2 years ago
Anyone with two neurons to rub together can see through your idiocy. The thing isn't even at the flight test stage, and development is done in the States, so it's never been in Afghanistan in the first place. You're trying to bluster your way out of your own ignorance with more ignorance, and that just doesn't wash with people who actually know what they're talking about.
dmillhoff 2 years ago
Im not arguing with you, you've obviously constructed a model Harrier jump jet at home and therefore know everything about aviation. "The x-47b isn't even at flight test stage", "Officially" Northrop Grumman provided 3 demonstrator UCAVs for operational assessment in 2007, that means they were without autonomous control systems and weapons, but still flying about, proving they could loiter and fly long distances, but we all know about the years of secrecy before there shown off to the world.
DJCUK77 2 years ago
actully it has bin in the skys about 30 times. it came out late 2008.
Randomizer77 2 years ago
'' not operatinal" its a unmanned wepon system and what dose this x have to do with afghanistan
Randomizer77 2 years ago
unmanned aircraft are better at flying than human pilots, period.
if you decide to reply, remember, I said "period">
RayG68 2 years ago
I want one, how much do they go for?
ogopogoo2 3 years ago
stargate...
jjtv101 3 years ago
mmm...impressive!
moussaemad 3 years ago
i am working on this plane its called N-ucas now
bollinbol 3 years ago
no your not
Edordorito 3 years ago 3
Not sure they'll actually let it land on a carrier automated they might not even allow it remote controlled and instead might have it use a parachute for recovery and have a helicopter grab it mid air.
Membrane556 3 years ago
The F-18 has an automatic carrier landing system, so why not? If a 30 year old plane design can do it...
jlsusa01 3 years ago 3
It will not use any parachute recovery system, the onboard computer will designate and asses all atmospheric, and surface variables during self-automated take-off and landing.
TheBlitz1 3 years ago
uavs have their place because they can fly a long time, like 50 hours at a time as opposed to 10 or so like an fa-18. When the uavs have done their job, the fa-18s can go mop up the job and be sure that it's done.
pete5668 3 years ago
SAAB GRIPEN.
Kuculcangod 3 years ago
Actually the F18s have to shoot down the manned fighters first.
Shooting down a ucav with another plane is pretty easy in Iraq they would shoot down predators with a helicopter or light aircraft and a shot gun.
After you gain air superiority you send in the ucavs to get targets such as sam sights or just loiter looking for mobile missile launchers etc.
You can think of them as a cheap spy platform of course here cheap is a relative term they still cost as much as any other fighter around $20M.
Membrane556 3 years ago
I highly doupt you can shoot something like X-47 with a shotgun. It's too fast and flies too high for any helicopter.
Nowdays MQ-9 can be armed with a two stingers... would be suicide to fly near it with something like Mi-8.
MokomaSusi 2 years ago
OK dork, shooting down a predator that is just meant to have long endurance and is prop driven isn't the same as shooting down a stealth aircraft powered by a jet engine. This is smaller (smaller rcs also) than a fighter and has a smaller heat signature. These are exactly what to send against sam sites.
Chopin742 2 years ago
Name a modern fighter that costs 20 million dollars!
Chopin742 2 years ago
Not to take sides, But i think a f-16 is around 20 million to 30 million.
GunshipBruce 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What an ugly plane. Navy admirals are never going to go for it.
quaternion99 3 years ago
LOL that shit is beautiful wtf are you talking about
TheBlitz1 3 years ago 4
One day we will wage wars with robots and there will be no more dead people :) only dead robots :(
darthgotica 4 years ago 2
Yeah, no. Don't be so optimistic about war. People will always die in a war.
TacereM 3 years ago 4
Don't be so pesimistic...
We should try to make future wars robotic.
And perhaps make it something like this...
Two countries have disputes that can only be solved by war... they take they robot armies and fight on poligon...
One side wins no dead soliders, no dead civilians...
Kinda like very expensive sports.
darthgotica 3 years ago
I'm not being pessimistic, I'm being a realist.
Do you really think global events that can have far reaching consequences will be solved with a friendly game of robotic warfare? It won't. Ever. People will always die in war. Who do you think is going to be controlling those UAV's and unmanned robots? Humans. And so they will become a target. And whose going to take care of those robots on a moving front? Humans. And that will make them a target. Computers are FAR from being self-aware.
TacereM 3 years ago 3
Well we need a new geneva convention.
You must admit that this convention was made during WW1 and did nothing to ban weapons like depleted uranium shells...
darthgotica 3 years ago 3