You're incredibly ignorant. Hamas, according to their own charter, Articles 7, 14 and 32, seeks to destroy all of Israel and exterminate the Jewish people. Hamas is responsible for suicide-bombings and rockeet attacks on innocent Israelis, who they see as "livingon Muslim land".
On top of this, Hamas is pretty much like a lot of other Arab nations, including it's Syrian sponsors. It executes homosexuals, tortures political opponents and uses human shields. They are not "good".
@ParamoreWorshipper its not like Israel is any better they were given land and took over and have been killing thousands of Palestinian civilians for century's
I like how in the end he suggests that antisemitism in the Arab world is a consequence of Israeli "occupation" and not the other way round. I mean, any historical documents will show that this is false. Even the rioting in Palestine in 1922 began because of beliefs that the "Jews came to suck our blood" & "The Jews are digging under Al-Aqsa"... Not to mention Arab-Nazi collaboration...
You want to see antisemitism in the Arab world? Go to any of the Islamic regimes in the area (Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, West Bank, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc), walk up to a 2 year old, and and ask him "Who is the most vile race in the eyes of God?" Answer: The Jews.
The moment Israel stops limiting Hamas's military arming is the moment Hamas stops becoming this "3000 untrained army" and becomes a real threat. So long as Israel stands, they will never stop fighting. They have proclaimed as much. On 1 hand, you say Israel should back off, and on the other you say that they're not a threat (because Israel hasn't backed off). You can't have both of these things.
Hezbollah - if silencing any protest by using Gestapo tactics on its own civilians can be called "working for the people" & "doing a great job", then you have very funny standards...
We've seen what type of "educational services" Hamas provides for the children in Gaza. How to make Molotov cocktails, being a martyr > all, Jews are evil. Yea, well done, Hamas...
Terrorism: The intentional use of indiscriminate fatal violence aimed towards civilians in hopes of invoking fear which will lead to political pressure.
What a complete charlatan. . . how on earth has he been invited onto a news channel? He condones 'revenge' by Hamas and excuses suicide bombings!! What a human roach.
Yeha...i´m with you, evry day i feel the result off HAMAS covert moviments, reflected in the banck spread taxes of my house, in my Social found that i´ve obligated to give by my government to back up bancks.... HAMAS should be destroyed...oh sorry, its not HAMAS its wall street and goldman sachs.
Hamas certainly does take care of their citizens - no free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of press or freedom of religion. Homosexuality is a crime punishable by death(public hanging or stoning depending on the gender), political opponents are thrown from rooftops and children are used as human shields.
When I see Hamas take other Muslim families hostage in order to use their apartments (instead of their own) for rocket attacks on Israel it kinda grinds on me. When I see Hamas terrorists hiding behind women, children, mosques, schools, clinics and hospitals, with hopes that using them will dissuade the IDF from responding to the Israeli civilians who were just targeted by the cowards...well, I really can't get too sad when Hamas body parts start defying gravity with the help of the IDF.
Hypnotized by our own impotent dogmas, we stubbornly refuse to recognize seemingly unrelated events — the never-ending Arab war against Israel, the September 11, the war in Chechnya, the terrorist acts in various parts of the world — for what they are: individual fronts of steadily growing Jihad, whose openly stated purpose is to destroy our civilization and establish the rule that would make Taliban look helplessly liberal. So far, they are winning.
Today, Muslems invade civilized countries under the benign guise of immigration. Their influence in Europe and even in the United States is growing steadily and will continue to do so unopposed until we finally wake up, although it's hard to tell if we are going to do it in time to save ourselves.
We are doomed to destruction unless we start treating Islam the way we did Nazism. I am not calling for an anti-Muslim genocide: our decisive victory in WWII was achieved without exterminating the Germans. Instead, we exterminated Nazism. Today, we have no choice but to exterminate the most murderous ideology that has ever existed — Islam.
Mosques, those foreposts of Jihad spread around the North America, Australia and Europe, are considered off limits as religious institutions. A cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
An Arab on the way to glorious martyrdom remains an unarmed civilian until he or she straps the explosives to his or her body. People who organize terrorist acts are considered unarmed civilians until their affiliation with a terrorist organization is proven, preferably in court. Women that lured 13 Israeli soldiers into a murderous trap in Jenin were perfectly unarmed civilians. Louis Farrakhan and his army are considered unarmed civilians.
In recent times, Israel is being daily penalized for killing Palestinian “unarmed civilians”. Nothing can be more absurd, considering that “Palestinian people” didn't even exist until after the Six Day war of 1967, when that shameful misnomer was assigned to the largest and most successful terrorist organization in history.
@NobleCrow10 I get a kick out of this Eric Margolis: ". . . . a few causalities due to the occasional suicide bombing, . . .", what a scream—how about if we whack off an occasional finger/toe/hand, whatever, of Eric Margolis, and after each cutting we have him back for a casual interview: "Hey, how's it going, Eric—we heard you've undergone an occasional whacking; tell us, u-u-u-h-h, . . . what your take is on the latest Middle East, . . ."?
“Innocence” of our civilians is non-existent for Muslims. The term is nothing but an absurd euphemism for our absurd inability to defend ourselves. Think about it: how can an infidel be innocent? Isn't it an obvious contradiction in terms? If you think I am being sarcastic, read the previous post again: I am only trying to explain how the enemy's mentality is better suited for the conflict than ours.
Blowing up an office building full innocent civilians advances Muslim cause much farther and much more convincingly (especially if we respond by engaging in soul-searching instead of exterminating Jihadists once and for all, which is perfectly within your power) than killing the same number of military personnel, precisely because those civilians are the most important, irreplaceable components of the way of life Muslims trying to destroy.
Jihad is not about territories. It is about a way of life. Muslims want to destroy Jewish way of life, so going after Israel's military installations would be largely futile, especially because IDF might is a billion times greater than anything Muslims could ever dream of amassing against Jews. But IDF, no matter how powerful, is only a tiny portion of Jewish way of life.
The Real News Really? Hamas is condemning the death of bin Laden and praising him as a martyr. I suppose this guy doesn't think of al-Qaeda as a terrorist group either.
Why Hamas on its own may not be a threat, this guy ignores that they are in cahoots with many others, Hezbollah, Iran, neo-Nazis, al-Qaeda.....
He also ignores that it is only thanks to Israel security measures that they have not achieved their ultimate goal .
Prime minister Haniyeh said he condemned bin Laden's assassination "despite the difference in interpretations between us." He also expressed hope the soul of bin Laden would "rest in peace."
Political analysts said these comments were addressed to Salafi Muslim groups in the Gaza Strip, who have been at odds with Hamas over its policies.
Added to this the extra-judicial killing of an unarmed man is illegal, and many analysts doubt bin Laden's involvement in 9/11.
@haroos The author is assumed to be Moshe Sasson, assistant to the director of the Arab Department in the Intelligence Service. The ethnic cleansing campaign did NOT end in May. It is estimated before the end of the war in 1949 at least 700,000 indigenous Arabs lost their homes.
Shortly before his death Ben-Gurion declared to Nahum Goldman: "Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country."
@haroos The Zionist leadership did something much worse than voting against the partition plan; they didn't await the implementation of the partition, but initiated the notorious Plan Dalet THE DAY AFTER THE VOTE. That indicates the Zionists endorsement of Resolution 181 was fake.
In March 1948, because of the Zionist violence against the Palestinians, the US, China and France were withdrawing from their earlier commitments to partition, and were pressing for a UN trusteeship over Palestine.
@haroos According to Qurvot of 1948, a detailed history of the Haganah and the Palmach, the aim of Plan Dalet was “control of the area given to us by the U.N. in addition to areas occupied by us which were outside these borders and the setting up of forces to counter the possible invasion of Arab armies.” It was also designed to “cleanse” such areas of their Arab inhabitants.
This proves Plan Dalet explicitely targeted the Arab territory as well. A premediated crime!
@haroos The natives of "Eretz Israel" always opposed large scale immigration, very much like most North Americans oppose the influx of Mexicans today. The natives were never consulted on the Balfour Declaration (as it was a secret document) and they later vehemently opposed its incorporation into the British mandate. During the Mandate years the Palestinians repeatedly call for an independent state, and an immigration stop, but to no avail.
Did the Palestinians really have a chance at the UN?
The US arm twisted dozens of small nations to get their support for the partitioning. For example, Greece and France were threatened with foreign aid cutoff, Liberia was threatened with a rubber embargo, several Latin American countries were bribed, etc.
Soon after Truman recognized Israel, his presidential campaign train was 'refueled' by the Zionists with $400,000 in contributions ($3.6 million in 2010 dollars).
yes, israel would have been 55%, but in 3 areas separated by the arab state, with 75% desert, and they would have had an arab state with an oberwhelming arab majority, while the jews would have had a jewish state with a demographic nightmare.
this "fuel" of truman is bs, it had nothing to do with anything, wtf are you on about ?
the palestinians could have won without doing anything.
the zionists moved under a leadership which acted within the laws of turkey and later mandatory england in palestine.
they built villages and towns and made it clear that they were building a nation.
the "palestinians" did NOTHING, they were complacent.
you are confusing a national movement , a nation working after so many years, with a group of families that had nothing to do with nationality , and that's why you think the way you do.
@haroos You're repeating the old propaganda line "the Arabs were backwards while Jews made the desert bloom". Even if that were the case, it still wouldn't entitle the immigrants to disposes and expel the native population.
You say the Zionists built villages and towns, but in fact the exact opposite happened. During the War of 1948, under plan Dalet, almost 400 Arab villages were wiped off the face of the earth by setting fire to them, blowing them up, and planting mines in their debris.
@haroos So you're saying it's ok for someone smarter or more 'civilized' than you to take over your home and expel your family at gunpoint... What does that have to do with human rights?
@adribon this whole debate began with you saying that "zionists" (that's a mask for not saying jews) have no right to live in israel.
expelled by gunpoint is a myth, most of them ran willingly, as i said before and gave proof.
the arabs had a chance for a state in 1948, and a jewish state with a large minority (maybe even majority for a while then) in which no arab would have been removed or left his home.
@haroos The declassified IDF report “The Emigration of the Arabs of Palestine in the Period 1/12/1947 - 1/6/1948″ estimated the refugee number until june at 391,000 and stated that Jewish military accounted for at least 70% if the Arab exodus from Palestine. The report also stated: “the Arab institutions attempted to struggle against the phenomenon of flight and evacuation, and to curb the waves of emigration”.
Did you know that during the past decade 124 Israeli children have been killed by Palestinians, but 1,452 Palestinian children have been killed by Israelis?
@adribon like muhamad al dura? you don't know real numbers?
how many Palestinians were killed by Syrians ,Jordanians , Egyptian or or by other Palestinians how you dare critisis israel the only democratic state in the middle-east where gay people have rights and women can have their own mind and vote
Turkey and Lebanon were democracies (with woman suffrage) even before Israel was.
Most of the dictatorships in the M.E. were installed and supported by the West and Israel (Shah, Mubarak, Saud, etc.), so these are largely responsible for their crimes.
Actually Israel is no real democracy, since only Jews have full rights, and also because millions of Palestinian refugees, who by international law are legally entitled to Israeli citizenship, cannot participate.
@adribon when kids do get hurt is mostly because thy are used as human shields or a tactical mistake and not with intention like Hadas ZL a few months old killed in cold blood
and during ww2 the mufti of jerusalem, haj amin al huseini (a member of arafat's family) was an honorary general in the SS, who recruited 100k bosnians whose primary role was to find and kill jews.
so what's your point ?
more than this, i will say :
when in eruope they will start to banish muslims by large numbers israel might jump on the wagon and do the same with people in the west bank (not the israeli arabs).
@haroos Amin al Huseini was appointed to his positions by the British, but later got exiled by them. He traveled to Berlin to seek help from the Germans in freeing his homeland from the British occupiers. The rest is mostly Zionist propaganda.
Did you know the Zionists had very close relations to the Nazis themselves? E.g. in 1937 the Haganah commander Feivel Polkes traveled to Berlin and invited Adolf Eichmann to Palestine.
"If I knew it was possible to save all [Jewish] children of Germany by their transfer to England and only half of them by transferring them to Eretz-Yisrael, I would choose the latter----because we are faced not only with the accounting of these [Jewish] children but also with the historical accounting of the Jewish People."
The Zionists were only interested in their ethnic project, not in saving lives!
@haroos The British made promises to both sides. But according the Treaty of Versailles all the conquered territories "belong to the indigenous inhabitants and communities". In spite of the native Palestinians vehemently opposing the massive Jewish immigration, and demanding immediate autonomy, the British Mandatory Power continued the controversial policy.
Resolution had no legal basis, because the proposed partition was outside the competence of the Assembly under the Charter of the UN.
@adribon the english government gave the balfour declaration which promised a national home to the jews in palestine.
they didn't specify borders of size, true, but a promise was made.
the british kept their promise (for nothing) to the hashemite family in the hussein-mcmahon agreement).
why should they reneg on a promise made to jews ?
before 1917, the turkish owned 85% of the land, the palestinians owned at most in 1948 12.5% of the land. the verssaile treaty explains syria and lebanon ?
@haroos The promise was not made to "the Jews", but to the Zionist movement (in the person of Walter Rothschield).
In the Ottoman periode most of the lands in the rural areas were owned by villages collectively and there was little individual land ownership in the countryside. The attempt by the central government in Istanbul to establish rights of land ownership (for taxation) never succeeded in Palestine and much land became registered under names of high Turkish officials.
@haroos That brings me to my earlier assertion, namely that the Zionists from the beginning on sought to disposess and expell the natives of "Eretz Israel". The evidence to this is overwhelming, while evidence of Arab orders is scant, to say the least.
For example, have you ever heared of the "village files"?
@adribon the english government gave the balfour declaration which promised a national home to the jews in palestine.
they didn't specify borders of size, true, but a promise was made.
the british kept their promise (for nothing) to the hashemite family in the hussein-mcmahon agreement).
why should they reneg on a promise made to jews ?
before 1917, the turkish owned 85% of the land, the palestinians owned at most in 1948 12.5% of the land. the verssaile treaty explains syria and lebanon ?
@IRightYouWrong The main human rights organizations tend to be quite independent. (That's why repressive regimes hate them.)
Israel refused to cooperate with an independent inquiry into its assault on Gaza, even though a fervent Zionist would be in charge. This indicates Israel knew the outcome would be highly damaging; an implicit admission of guilt.
For 2½ years Goldstone stood by his commissions findings, until the enormous pressure of the Jewish community became too much to bear.
@IRightYouWrong On the Gaza assault in 2008/9 Amnesty International concluded:
“[We] found no evidence that Hamas directed the movement of civilians to shield military objectives from attacks. In all of the cases investigated of families killed when their homes were bombed by Israeli forces none of the houses struck was being used by armed groups for military activities. However we did find that Israeli soldiers used civilians, including children, as ‘human shields’, endangeringtheir lives.”
@haroos Israeli historian Benny Morris wrote on the topic in his book "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem". Google [Khaled al Azm Birth revisited] and read note 95.
@adribon so you hae no link, and your evidence is a historian who had an agenda, who has since made a turn about and blames palestinians for reaching no peace, as far as saying that there can be no peace with them.
again, i remind you, the people who wrote in their books about the lies to the pals, were not historians 40 years after, they were the people who made decisions in real time back then.
@haroos Instead of debating the significance of the two Arab accounts, lets look at the evidence the Zionist leaders intended to expel the native population:
In 1937 Ben-Gurion wrote:
"With compulsory transfer we [would] have a vast area [for settlement] ....
I support compulsory transfer. I don't see anything immoral in it."
Moshe Sharett declared in 1947:
"[W]hen the Jewish state is established--it is very possible that the result will be transfer of the Arabs."
Are you aware of the fact Hamas is much more efficient than Israel at *not* killing civilians, using makeshift rockets and suicide bombings, even though Israel is using state of the art U.S weaponry?
Hamas is a resistance movement, and in order to understand its actions you need to understand the nature of Israel's 44 year long military occupation.
Double the aid to Israel and it is still a pittance. They have shown the free world the true nature and intent of the global Muslim - conquest.
Without Israel, the radical Muslim nations might have quietly and peacefully built nuclear arsenals. Without Israel, could the world have been convinced that they would use their nukes over, say, a cartoon drawing?
Israel bleeds daily to expose their quest to destroy the 'infidel'. How does one put a price on that?
Did you know the cease-fire between the government in Gaza and Israel is repeatedly violated by *Israel*, while Hamas generally respects it, except in reaction to these violations?
According to International Law an occupying power is *fully responsible* for the well being of the population it is occupying. So providing Gaza with water, fuel and electricity would be no more than Israels legal duty!
You take Israeli propaganda at face value but reject the testimonies of independent observers.
Although Hamas is guilty of terror, this is to a significantly less extent than Israel.
Israel continues to be the occupying power that’s controlling Gaza, and it has imposed a very illegal, barbaric and immoral siege on Gaza, causing the slow death of hundred, even thousands, of Palestinians, the pollution of the water supply, and many problems with access to healthcare, education.
This guy is fucking ridiculous. You are seriously going to sit there and compare assassinations of Hamas leaders who were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of innocent civillians with suicide bombers targeting children at pizzarias in Israel!??! You are fucking scum. And the Palestinians have recieved just as much financial aid that Israel has if not more, only difference, is the Palestinian leadership used this money to pad its swiss bank accounts and the Israelis spent it on the people!
Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one-fifth of America's entire foreign aid budget. By all accounts the United States has given more money to Israel than to any other country. The Congressional Research Service’s conservative estimate of total cumulative US aid to Israel (not adjusted for inflation) from 1949 through 2010 is $109.001 billion.
$400 million have been appropriated for economic aid to the Palestinians for 2010.
@adribon yes we invest a little more per capita in Israel because they are a strategic ally in the region (intelligence, access to the Suez cannal in case Egypt closes it again). 100 billion over 60 years would make up 3% of our budget if we paid it all in 2010. And we are careful giving aid to Palestine when it goes to rockets and families of suicide bombers... The PLO, Hamas and Hezbollah have made aid very difficult. If they would use this aid to build infrastructure it would be different
The siege of the US embassy in Tehran in 1979, an event to which Carter had so miserably failed to respond, can be very well used as the day WWIII stepped out of the pages of the Koran and into the current events. I pray the United States, Canada, Australia and Israel lead the world to victory in this war. Come to think of it, there is no choice, be you a Christian, a Jew, or even, believe it or not, a Muslim.
You must understanding of the “Palestinians'” murderous motives. I am afraid however that you, along with 99% of the population of this planet have missed the beginning of WWIII (the enemy call it Jihad) quite a few years ago.
The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying again, Mr. Margolis, was its beginning?
The opposite is true: the so-called "Palestinians" are nothing more than a generic Arabs settled on the Hebrew Land, attracted by Jobs created by Jews and by the Jewish capital. It is time for Arabs to go back home were the came from - 22 Arab country which must accommodate their Muslim brothers. The so- called "Palestinians" should not be Israel problem. With respect to Zionism - like "American Dream", Zionism is a Jewish Dream to assemble Jews on historic Jewish Land. Very Good Idea!
@NobleCrow10 This myth was popularized by Joan Peters in het 1984 best-seller "From Time Immemorial". The problem is, the whole book is a fraud. Just read the critiques.
For one, the renown Israeli demographer Roberto Bachi has done extensive research in the past population of Palestine. According to him during the whole Arab periode Jews were only a tiny minority. Around 1800 there were perhaps 5,000-6,500 Jews and some 265,000-325,000 gentiles lived in Palestine.
@haroos This is a variation to the theme the "Jewish return and redemption of the Promised Land".
Pre-Zionist Palestine was far from a backward, destitute wilderness Zionist propaganda claims it to be.
But even if that was the case, did that legitimize the outright theft of the Palestinian people's homes, farms, businesses, banks, cars, buses, schools, etc.? Did that justify the expulsion of the indigenous population to make way for the newly arrived European Jewish refugees?
@haroos As early as 1891, Ahad Ha'Am reported upon visiting Palestine for three months:
"We abroad are used to believe the Eretz Yisrael is now almost totally desolate, a desert that is not sowed ..... But in truth that is not the case. Throughout the country it is difficult to find fields that are not sowed. Only sand dunes and stony mountains .... are not cultivated."
@haroos Ahad Ha'Am also wrote: "We are used to thinking of the Arabs as primitive men of the desert, as a donkey-like nation that neither sees nor understands what is going around it. But this is a GREAT ERROR. The Arab, like all sons of Sham, has sharp and crafty mind . . . Should time come when life of our people in Palestine imposes to a smaller or greater extent on the natives, they WILL NOT easily step aside."
@haroos So we have an important early Zionist telling that Palestine's lands was extensively cultivated by the natives who he perceives as far from being naive or backwards.
Hardly anything the hasbara claims can withstand scrutiny... doesn't that bother you?
@haroos The more damaging the truth, the more money is spent in spreading lies. Take a close look at what you've been told about Israel's history, and you'll never be the same again.
@adribon that's a generalized slogen, what's you've said,
if there is meat to your words, then put it on the table.
you're saying nothing realy.
before you said that the "stories" that the palestinains were told to leave by arab countries, are lies, but there is proof of that.
you ignore that ?
i am from israel, if there's anything in israel's history you wish to "explain" to me, go ahead, let's see what "facts" YOU were told, and what facts i was told.
@haroos The Israeli propagande claim of Arab radio broadcasts urging the Palestinians to leave, was conclusively demolished by Erskine Childers and Walid Khalidi in the early 1960s. They showed the back files of the Near East monitoring stations of the British and US governments (both of which covered all the Arab radio stations, but local news papers as well) contained no evidence of such arab orders.
@haroos Those are quotes are taken largely out of context with their meaning distorted. Mahmoud Abbas said the Arab armies forced the Palestinians to leave by *abandoning* them, so not by *intention*!
Israeli propaganda has largely relinquished the claim that the Palestinian exodus of 1948 was 'self-inspired'. Official circles implicitly concede that the Arab population fled as a result of Israeli action - whether directly, as in the case of Lydda and Ramleh, or indirectly, due to the panic that and similar actions (the Deir Yassin massacre) inspired in Arab population centers throughout Palestine.
@adribon prime minister of syria at the time admits it, prime minister of iraq at the time admits to it, abu mazen admits to it.
what mroe do you need ?
the very leaders of two of the arab countries, and the filthy abu mazen openly admitted that they lied to palestinians (the first two) and abu mazen accuses the arab leadership of lying to his people.
enough is enough.
i'm not saying there were no other reasons, but this was the major one.
@haroos Except for quotes which could be interpreted both ways, not *one* record of such orders coming from the Arab leadership has been found. To have been a major factor for the flight of 700,000 people you'd expect massive evidence. On the other hand plenty of orders to the population to stay put have been found.
And from the point of view of miliary logistics the claim makes no sense at all. The Arab armies needed the help of the local population for food, manpower and information.
@haroos Britan and the US recorded *all* radio frequencies in the Middle East. In this massive archive of sound recordings not one appeal to the Palestinians to leave their homes has been identified. The same applied for all the local news papers. Nothing which even resembles an order to leave their homes. What the data does show is repeated calls to *stay put*!
In the light of this evidence, some ambiguous Arab quotes from many years later is irrelevant.
UN Resolution 181 proposed giving 56% of Palestine to the Jewish immigrants, who made up just 1/3 of the population, and possessed only 7% of the territory. The mistake many people make about the partition plan is that it was never implemented!
Days after the vote the Jewish Agency initiated Plan Dalet, a military campaign against the natives in order to expel them. They succeeded in removing some 80% of the gentiles. Arab leaders *never* called on the Palestinians to leave!
@haroos Various scholars have done extensive research in the archives of the war and have found absolutely no evidence to the claim by the Zionists that the Palestinians were asked to leave by the Arabs leaders. Moreover Israel has never pointed to any specific instance. It was merely a propaganda lie.
The 56% of the area allocated to the Zionist movement included the most fertile parts of Palestine. Indeed, the native Palestinians rejected the partition of their homeland. Wouldn't you too?
In fact, there is only one way to achieve piece in the Middle East. Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 60 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria.
The so called “Palestinians” have only one motivation: the destruction of Israel, and in my book that is not sufficient to consider them a “nation” — or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled.
The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them.
The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it “Palestinian people” and installed it in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria.
Mr Margolis, here is a sarcastic question: If the people you mistakenly call “Palestinians” are anything but generic Arabs collected from all over — or thrown out of — the Arab world, if they really have a genuine ethnic identity that gives them right for self-determination, why did they never try to become independent until Arabs suffered their devastating defeat in the Six Day War?
While I am writing, Khomeini's Iran is working towards the Bomb. And if you're honest with yourself, you know that Israel is the only country that can, and will, do something about it. Israel will, out of necessity, act in a way that is the not the norm, and you'd better hope that they do it in a destructive manner. Any sane person would rather have a rogue Israel than a Nuclear Iran.
Israel willfully and forcefully disregards international law. In 1981 Israel destroyed Osirak -- Sadam Hussein’s nuclear bomb lab. Every government in the world knew that Hussein was building a bomb. And they did nothing. Except for Israel. Yes, in doing so they broke international law and custom. But they also saved us all from a nuclear Iraq. That rogue action should earn Israel a place of respect in the eyes of all freedom-loving peoples. But it hasn't.
Most countries in the Middle East are Theocracies and Autocracies. But Israel is the sole, the only, the rogue, democracy. Out of every country in the Middle East, only in Israel do anti-government protests and reporting go un-quashed and uncensored.
In Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, and Syria, homosexual conduct is punishable by flogging, imprisonment, or both. But homosexuals there get off pretty lightly compared to their counterparts in Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen, who are put to death. Israeli homosexuals can adopt, openly serve in the army, enter civil unions, and are protected by exceptionally strongly worded ant-discrimination legislation.
When you compare Israel to its regional neighbors, it becomes clear just how roguish Israel is. And here is the fourth argument: Israel has a better human rights record than any of its neighbors. At no point in history, has there ever been a liberal democratic state in the Middle East -- except for Israel. Of all the countries in the Middle East, Israel is the only one where the LGBT community enjoys even a small measure of equality.
You would never see the Spanish government in peace talks with the leaders of the ETA -- the British government would never negotiate with Thomas Murphy, Russian PM Putin with Chechen Basaev. And if President Obama were to sit down and talk about peace with Osama Bin Laden, the world would view this as insanity. But Israel can do the exact same thing -- and earn international praise in the process. That is the dictionary definition of rogue -- behaving in a way that is unexpected, or not normal.
Abed Rabbo also used to be a leader of the PFLP -- an organization of “freedom fighters” that, under Abed Rabbo’s leadership, engaged in such freedom-promoting activities as killing 22 Israeli high school students. And the Israeli government is sending delegates to sit at a table with this man, and talk about peace. And the world applauds.
I have problem with the fact that the Israeli government engages in an activity which the rest of the world shuns -- it negotiates with terrorists. Forget the late PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, a man who died with blood all over his hands -- they're in the process of negotiating with terrorists as we speak. Yasser Abed Rabbo is one of the lead PLO negotiators that has been sent to the peace talks with Israel.
During “Great Arab Revolt” of 1936-1939, in which “Palestinians” enthusiastically participated and which Germany funded, the swastika was used as a mark of identity on Arab leaflets and graffiti. Arab children welcomed each other with Hitler salute, and pictures of Hitler were displayed at celebrations. The identification was so strong that travelers through areas of the “Palestinian” Arabs revolt learned that it was prudent to attach a swastika to their car to ward off attacks by Arab snipers.
Islam followers (“Palestinian” Arabs inclusive) easily transplanted into the Arab world a newly Nazified form of traditional Muslim Jew-hatred, with Arab translation of Hitler “Mein Kampf” (translated into Arabic as “My Jihad”) and other Nazi anti-Semitic works, including “Der Sturmer” hate cartoons, adapted to portray the Jew as the demonic enemy of Allah.
Both Nazism and Islam are explicitly anti-nationalist in the sense that they believe in the liquidation of the nation state in a favor of trans-national unifying community: in Islam the “umma” (community of all believers); and in Nazism the “herrenvolk” (master race). Both worshiped the unifying totalitarian figure of the Caliph or Furer. And both rapidly hated the Jews and sought their destruction.
Muslim brotherhood (HAMAS is part of it) found a soul mate in Nazi Germany. Both movements sought world conquest and domination. Both were triumphalist and supremacist: in Nazism the Aryan must rule, while in Islam, the Muslim religion must hold domination. Both advocates subordination of the individual to a folkish central power.
The Muslim groups which today threaten the West with terrorism, subversion and insurgency, and which, in their own words, seek to bring about a global totalitarian empire are not only fascist in the broad sociological sense, but can trace their literal historical origins to Nazism and its genocidal ambitions.
@StaciMermaid
You're incredibly ignorant. Hamas, according to their own charter, Articles 7, 14 and 32, seeks to destroy all of Israel and exterminate the Jewish people. Hamas is responsible for suicide-bombings and rockeet attacks on innocent Israelis, who they see as "livingon Muslim land".
On top of this, Hamas is pretty much like a lot of other Arab nations, including it's Syrian sponsors. It executes homosexuals, tortures political opponents and uses human shields. They are not "good".
ParamoreWorshipper 1 month ago
@ParamoreWorshipper its not like Israel is any better they were given land and took over and have been killing thousands of Palestinian civilians for century's
FuhQ21 5 hours ago
I like how in the end he suggests that antisemitism in the Arab world is a consequence of Israeli "occupation" and not the other way round. I mean, any historical documents will show that this is false. Even the rioting in Palestine in 1922 began because of beliefs that the "Jews came to suck our blood" & "The Jews are digging under Al-Aqsa"... Not to mention Arab-Nazi collaboration...
guilty787 2 months ago
You want to see antisemitism in the Arab world? Go to any of the Islamic regimes in the area (Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, West Bank, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc), walk up to a 2 year old, and and ask him "Who is the most vile race in the eyes of God?" Answer: The Jews.
guilty787 2 months ago
The moment Israel stops limiting Hamas's military arming is the moment Hamas stops becoming this "3000 untrained army" and becomes a real threat. So long as Israel stands, they will never stop fighting. They have proclaimed as much. On 1 hand, you say Israel should back off, and on the other you say that they're not a threat (because Israel hasn't backed off). You can't have both of these things.
guilty787 2 months ago
Hezbollah - if silencing any protest by using Gestapo tactics on its own civilians can be called "working for the people" & "doing a great job", then you have very funny standards...
guilty787 2 months ago
We've seen what type of "educational services" Hamas provides for the children in Gaza. How to make Molotov cocktails, being a martyr > all, Jews are evil. Yea, well done, Hamas...
guilty787 2 months ago
Terrorism: The intentional use of indiscriminate fatal violence aimed towards civilians in hopes of invoking fear which will lead to political pressure.
See? Not that hard to define.
guilty787 2 months ago
What a complete charlatan. . . how on earth has he been invited onto a news channel? He condones 'revenge' by Hamas and excuses suicide bombings!! What a human roach.
JonasBridgous 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Letter to Palestinians
/watch?v=1skU_nVaMl8&hd=1
Christian Right are pro-zionist zealots
/watch?v=wIBp4mj5C94
If Americans knew
/watch?v=ynWjYHP91gA
9/11 Motive & Media Betrayal
/watch?v=95ncn5Q16N4
techcafe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy
/watch?v=uNQv5YSg_YA
Who/What is Hamas?
/watch?v=qbVZgrUUSnA
Hitler's Deal with the Zionists
/watch?v=QOmEPQzA20g
Who were first terrorists?
/watch?v=vsDJ3YivBSA
techcafe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rabbi says dismantle zionist entity
/watch?v=8xrRO9NjWjQ
Jews united against zionism
/watch?v=0haybEo-Tx4&hd=1
Is change possible in Israel?
/watch?v=vIj0l6C5VqE
techcafe 4 months ago
hamas is a real poison...they should be destroyed ( eliminated ) from the face of the earth
MikeMercury 5 months ago
@MikeMercury
Yeha...i´m with you, evry day i feel the result off HAMAS covert moviments, reflected in the banck spread taxes of my house, in my Social found that i´ve obligated to give by my government to back up bancks.... HAMAS should be destroyed...oh sorry, its not HAMAS its wall street and goldman sachs.
Sorry!
open your eyes vermit...you´ve being doped
streetwarrior31 4 months ago
@MikeMercury
how do you think we should do that?
You cant shoot an idea...
Loupland 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
israel is a nuclear state
israel is a terrorist state
israel is a pirate state
israel is an apartheid state
israel is an illegal state
israel is not an ally of the U.S. - it is the BOSS
israel is not a democracy - it is a racial colony
the UN itself has already said that zionism is racism
Arabs are semites, nothing is more antisemitic than zionism
techcafe 6 months ago
Occupation 101 (required viewing)
vimeo. com/14327996
The General's Son
/watch?v=c4ZfnpN4Dfc&hd=1
IDF Soldiers Speak Out
/watch?v=37MFa7ZKQWo&hd=1
The Zionist Story
/watch?v=ufLAitMq3zI&hd=1
Israeli Myths & Propaganda:
/watch?v=sIWvcBzbqVc
techcafe 6 months ago
hamas=al kida for israel that is it noting more nothing less GET THAT DEEP INSIDE YOUR MINDS
WE want peace WE tell YOU we tell THEM
im from ISRAEL and i love israel what will you do if sumone will attack your cuntry,YOU WILL FIGHT BACK we DIFFEND we DONT ATTACE they SATRT THE WARS
tesla0vs0adeson 6 months ago
ok Hamas takes care of their citizens, so its not bad in Gaza, and stop blaming Israel fuckers!
davek381 6 months ago
@davek381
Hamas certainly does take care of their citizens - no free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of press or freedom of religion. Homosexuality is a crime punishable by death(public hanging or stoning depending on the gender), political opponents are thrown from rooftops and children are used as human shields.
ParamoreWorshipper 1 month ago
@Pill88Dickle the united states DUH!
peanuts8 7 months ago
@Pill88Dickle Which ones? The Zionist dirty scum?
deeppurple28 8 months ago
"Yes, Allah is greater than America. Allah is greater than the superpowers. We say to this west, by Allah you will be defeated.
Today, the Arab and Islamic nation is rising and awakening, it will regain the leadership of the world. Death to Israel. Death to America."
Khaled Mash'al Hamas Leader
Any group that praises the likes of bin Laden as a " martyr" is a threat to us all.
Hamas has now teamed up with Fatah, whats to keep them from teaming up with
al Qaeda, Iran and others down the road?
theresmoretoit1 8 months ago
Hes so right.. The PNA has started the negotiations with Israel since 94 N they got nothing but more Israeli arrogance!!!
Hamas + PIJ = Maximum Respect.
Maher0Ms 8 months ago
When I see Hamas take other Muslim families hostage in order to use their apartments (instead of their own) for rocket attacks on Israel it kinda grinds on me. When I see Hamas terrorists hiding behind women, children, mosques, schools, clinics and hospitals, with hopes that using them will dissuade the IDF from responding to the Israeli civilians who were just targeted by the cowards...well, I really can't get too sad when Hamas body parts start defying gravity with the help of the IDF.
Uluwatusunrise 6 months ago
Hypnotized by our own impotent dogmas, we stubbornly refuse to recognize seemingly unrelated events — the never-ending Arab war against Israel, the September 11, the war in Chechnya, the terrorist acts in various parts of the world — for what they are: individual fronts of steadily growing Jihad, whose openly stated purpose is to destroy our civilization and establish the rule that would make Taliban look helplessly liberal. So far, they are winning.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Today, Muslems invade civilized countries under the benign guise of immigration. Their influence in Europe and even in the United States is growing steadily and will continue to do so unopposed until we finally wake up, although it's hard to tell if we are going to do it in time to save ourselves.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
@NobleCrow10 So true, . . .
phillipgaley 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We are doomed to destruction unless we start treating Islam the way we did Nazism. I am not calling for an anti-Muslim genocide: our decisive victory in WWII was achieved without exterminating the Germans. Instead, we exterminated Nazism. Today, we have no choice but to exterminate the most murderous ideology that has ever existed — Islam.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago 2
@NobleCrow10 If you started shotgunning Molems, here in Milquetoast America, you're pretty sure of not having a jury to back you up; so, . . .
phillipgaley 8 months ago
Mosques, those foreposts of Jihad spread around the North America, Australia and Europe, are considered off limits as religious institutions. A cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
An Arab on the way to glorious martyrdom remains an unarmed civilian until he or she straps the explosives to his or her body. People who organize terrorist acts are considered unarmed civilians until their affiliation with a terrorist organization is proven, preferably in court. Women that lured 13 Israeli soldiers into a murderous trap in Jenin were perfectly unarmed civilians. Louis Farrakhan and his army are considered unarmed civilians.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In recent times, Israel is being daily penalized for killing Palestinian “unarmed civilians”. Nothing can be more absurd, considering that “Palestinian people” didn't even exist until after the Six Day war of 1967, when that shameful misnomer was assigned to the largest and most successful terrorist organization in history.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
@NobleCrow10 I get a kick out of this Eric Margolis: ". . . . a few causalities due to the occasional suicide bombing, . . .", what a scream—how about if we whack off an occasional finger/toe/hand, whatever, of Eric Margolis, and after each cutting we have him back for a casual interview: "Hey, how's it going, Eric—we heard you've undergone an occasional whacking; tell us, u-u-u-h-h, . . . what your take is on the latest Middle East, . . ."?
phillipgaley 8 months ago
“Innocence” of our civilians is non-existent for Muslims. The term is nothing but an absurd euphemism for our absurd inability to defend ourselves. Think about it: how can an infidel be innocent? Isn't it an obvious contradiction in terms? If you think I am being sarcastic, read the previous post again: I am only trying to explain how the enemy's mentality is better suited for the conflict than ours.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
Blowing up an office building full innocent civilians advances Muslim cause much farther and much more convincingly (especially if we respond by engaging in soul-searching instead of exterminating Jihadists once and for all, which is perfectly within your power) than killing the same number of military personnel, precisely because those civilians are the most important, irreplaceable components of the way of life Muslims trying to destroy.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
Jihad is not about territories. It is about a way of life. Muslims want to destroy Jewish way of life, so going after Israel's military installations would be largely futile, especially because IDF might is a billion times greater than anything Muslims could ever dream of amassing against Jews. But IDF, no matter how powerful, is only a tiny portion of Jewish way of life.
NobleCrow10 8 months ago
The Real News Really? Hamas is condemning the death of bin Laden and praising him as a martyr. I suppose this guy doesn't think of al-Qaeda as a terrorist group either.
Why Hamas on its own may not be a threat, this guy ignores that they are in cahoots with many others, Hezbollah, Iran, neo-Nazis, al-Qaeda.....
He also ignores that it is only thanks to Israel security measures that they have not achieved their ultimate goal .
theresmoretoit1 8 months ago
@theresmoretoit1
Prime minister Haniyeh said he condemned bin Laden's assassination "despite the difference in interpretations between us." He also expressed hope the soul of bin Laden would "rest in peace."
Political analysts said these comments were addressed to Salafi Muslim groups in the Gaza Strip, who have been at odds with Hamas over its policies.
Added to this the extra-judicial killing of an unarmed man is illegal, and many analysts doubt bin Laden's involvement in 9/11.
adribon 8 months ago
Wenn die Soldaten
Nazis
nessus
Skypilotbaby 9 months ago
@MrPmd1 And what have learned from the Holocaust?
adribon 9 months ago
I want to learn about the middle east, its history, and how the nations interact with one another. Can anyone suggest where to start?
hoagiesupreme 9 months ago
@hoagiesupreme not realy, the leftists historians regard history as a political tool, reshaping it to their agenda.
the rightists, tbh, are not that far off.
so form an opinion if you can and see if you see holes in it, if not, then you've made your choice.
haroos 9 months ago
@hoagiesupreme "A History of the Middle East" by Peter Mansfield.
adribon 9 months ago
@volumedealer1 MWOUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I SOUND LIKE AN IDIOT WHO LEAVES IDIOT COMMENTS ON YOUTUBE!! MWOUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
STOP ASKING STUPID QUESTIONS, IDIOT> MORON!!! THEN U GET A STUPID ANSWER = MWOUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
jacktanous 9 months ago
i don't know of this report, unless it was the one written by meir pail, who is a man that even the palestinians didn't consider reliable.
391k ?
i gree roughly on hte number, pointless not to, what about the jews who left the arab world.
most of them willingly, true, but after being harrased and attack by the locals.
their numbers are about the same.
seems a good deal to me.
best thing is the rest of the arabs in wb/gs be removed to jordan where they belong.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The author is assumed to be Moshe Sasson, assistant to the director of the Arab Department in the Intelligence Service. The ethnic cleansing campaign did NOT end in May. It is estimated before the end of the war in 1949 at least 700,000 indigenous Arabs lost their homes.
Shortly before his death Ben-Gurion declared to Nahum Goldman: "Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country."
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon you're qouting a lot, but ben gurion said many things.
he said that jerusalem is ours, and the golan heights, at the same time he answered YES to the un partition plan.
and the palestinians said NO.
the palestinians decided that the jews cannot have a land and for that they got screwed.
i call it justice.
remember, for the third time :
they could have had it all.
but their choice was NO because the jews would have gotten SOMETHING.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The Zionist leadership did something much worse than voting against the partition plan; they didn't await the implementation of the partition, but initiated the notorious Plan Dalet THE DAY AFTER THE VOTE. That indicates the Zionists endorsement of Resolution 181 was fake.
In March 1948, because of the Zionist violence against the Palestinians, the US, China and France were withdrawing from their earlier commitments to partition, and were pressing for a UN trusteeship over Palestine.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon israel didn't initiate the war.
enough with the bs about dalet, it was enacted within the new israeli borders that's it.
the arabs went beyond their aloted borders and attacked jews.
they paid for their crime.
israel won, they lost.
and again and again, they could have said yes.
you justify their refusal by saying what happened later, that is a ridiculous flawed logic.
explain why the arabs rejected a partition plan that gave them an independent free land ?
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos According to Qurvot of 1948, a detailed history of the Haganah and the Palmach, the aim of Plan Dalet was “control of the area given to us by the U.N. in addition to areas occupied by us which were outside these borders and the setting up of forces to counter the possible invasion of Arab armies.” It was also designed to “cleanse” such areas of their Arab inhabitants.
This proves Plan Dalet explicitely targeted the Arab territory as well. A premediated crime!
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon again.
you ignore this for the 4th time :
this wouldn't have happened if the arabs had said yes.
the fact that you avoid this issue of the arab refusal proves that you know they were wrong.
they admit they were wrong.
after that, plan dalet or whatever is a matter of versions and commentary, i am obviously opposed to your deduction of the matter.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos
The native population rejected an unjust proposal to give 55% of their land to a settler movement. What's wrong about that?
And did the Palestinians deserve to be expelled just for how they voted?
And by your account voting "the wrong way", is a serious crime, but ethnically cleansing 700,000 people is not an issue...
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon the jews began to immigrate since 1884, in various waves.
each time they built towns and villages, each time they grew in numbers.
all this while where were the arabs ?
you say "natives" as if they are indians in america, but they had their chance.
in 1917 after balfour where were they ?
the palestinians are not and never have been a nation, that is why they were frozen.
the jews did everything openly, there were no secrets of the jewish ambitions.
arabs said NO.
and paid.
justice.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The natives of "Eretz Israel" always opposed large scale immigration, very much like most North Americans oppose the influx of Mexicans today. The natives were never consulted on the Balfour Declaration (as it was a secret document) and they later vehemently opposed its incorporation into the British mandate. During the Mandate years the Palestinians repeatedly call for an independent state, and an immigration stop, but to no avail.
adribon 9 months ago
@haroos
Did the Palestinians really have a chance at the UN?
The US arm twisted dozens of small nations to get their support for the partitioning. For example, Greece and France were threatened with foreign aid cutoff, Liberia was threatened with a rubber embargo, several Latin American countries were bribed, etc.
Soon after Truman recognized Israel, his presidential campaign train was 'refueled' by the Zionists with $400,000 in contributions ($3.6 million in 2010 dollars).
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon did they have a chance ?
the partition plan was all in favor of them.
yes, israel would have been 55%, but in 3 areas separated by the arab state, with 75% desert, and they would have had an arab state with an oberwhelming arab majority, while the jews would have had a jewish state with a demographic nightmare.
this "fuel" of truman is bs, it had nothing to do with anything, wtf are you on about ?
the palestinians could have won without doing anything.
they were just arabs, tough.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The Zionists were foreign colonizers. Whatever gave them right to sovereignty over any part of Palestine, let alone over more than half?
And refering to Arabs as a "demographic nightmare" is extremely pejorative; sounds like you're talking of a disease instead of human beings.
adribon 9 months ago
the zionists moved under a leadership which acted within the laws of turkey and later mandatory england in palestine.
they built villages and towns and made it clear that they were building a nation.
the "palestinians" did NOTHING, they were complacent.
you are confusing a national movement , a nation working after so many years, with a group of families that had nothing to do with nationality , and that's why you think the way you do.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos You're repeating the old propaganda line "the Arabs were backwards while Jews made the desert bloom". Even if that were the case, it still wouldn't entitle the immigrants to disposes and expel the native population.
You say the Zionists built villages and towns, but in fact the exact opposite happened. During the War of 1948, under plan Dalet, almost 400 Arab villages were wiped off the face of the earth by setting fire to them, blowing them up, and planting mines in their debris.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon petaqh tikva 1884, rishon lezion 1892, tel aviv 1906, netanya 1935, many many others.
from before the turks left, and while the british ruled.
the jews built.
fact.
the arabs are not backwards individually, but look at them now even, and tell me where you see porgress ?
do you see human rights anywhere in the arab world ?
the differences are there.
deal with it.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos So you're saying it's ok for someone smarter or more 'civilized' than you to take over your home and expel your family at gunpoint... What does that have to do with human rights?
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon this whole debate began with you saying that "zionists" (that's a mask for not saying jews) have no right to live in israel.
expelled by gunpoint is a myth, most of them ran willingly, as i said before and gave proof.
the arabs had a chance for a state in 1948, and a jewish state with a large minority (maybe even majority for a while then) in which no arab would have been removed or left his home.
they rejected, they chose war.
they got what they wanted.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The declassified IDF report “The Emigration of the Arabs of Palestine in the Period 1/12/1947 - 1/6/1948″ estimated the refugee number until june at 391,000 and stated that Jewish military accounted for at least 70% if the Arab exodus from Palestine. The report also stated: “the Arab institutions attempted to struggle against the phenomenon of flight and evacuation, and to curb the waves of emigration”.
adribon 9 months ago
lets kill a few of your kids you wife can have more
saar19238 9 months ago
@saar19238
Did you know that during the past decade 124 Israeli children have been killed by Palestinians, but 1,452 Palestinian children have been killed by Israelis?
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon like muhamad al dura? you don't know real numbers?
how many Palestinians were killed by Syrians ,Jordanians , Egyptian or or by other Palestinians how you dare critisis israel the only democratic state in the middle-east where gay people have rights and women can have their own mind and vote
saar19238 9 months ago
@saar19238
Turkey and Lebanon were democracies (with woman suffrage) even before Israel was.
Most of the dictatorships in the M.E. were installed and supported by the West and Israel (Shah, Mubarak, Saud, etc.), so these are largely responsible for their crimes.
Actually Israel is no real democracy, since only Jews have full rights, and also because millions of Palestinian refugees, who by international law are legally entitled to Israeli citizenship, cannot participate.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon when kids do get hurt is mostly because thy are used as human shields or a tactical mistake and not with intention like Hadas ZL a few months old killed in cold blood
saar19238 9 months ago
this guy is nuts with papers and is full of shit
saar19238 9 months ago
and during ww2 the mufti of jerusalem, haj amin al huseini (a member of arafat's family) was an honorary general in the SS, who recruited 100k bosnians whose primary role was to find and kill jews.
so what's your point ?
more than this, i will say :
when in eruope they will start to banish muslims by large numbers israel might jump on the wagon and do the same with people in the west bank (not the israeli arabs).
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Amin al Huseini was appointed to his positions by the British, but later got exiled by them. He traveled to Berlin to seek help from the Germans in freeing his homeland from the British occupiers. The rest is mostly Zionist propaganda.
Did you know the Zionists had very close relations to the Nazis themselves? E.g. in 1937 the Haganah commander Feivel Polkes traveled to Berlin and invited Adolf Eichmann to Palestine.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon he was exiled after the terror attacks against the british in the years 1936-1939.
starngely years that co'incide with the prelude to war in europe (from anshlus onwards)...
he was appointed general of the SS, for helping the nazis.
get it ?
helping the nazis.
as for the jewish point you mention, there were 2-3 other such cases and ALL had one goal only :
to save jews.
not to kill anyone else.
big difference, wouldn't you agree ?
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos To save Jewish lives you say...
One month after Kristalnacht Ben-Gurion stated:
"If I knew it was possible to save all [Jewish] children of Germany by their transfer to England and only half of them by transferring them to Eretz-Yisrael, I would choose the latter----because we are faced not only with the accounting of these [Jewish] children but also with the historical accounting of the Jewish People."
The Zionists were only interested in their ethnic project, not in saving lives!
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon you're aughable, the jews were helpless under a lying english rule, that made promise it didn't intend to keep, and with wolrd persecution.
do you know why ?
because it is the same mind set that said "yes" to everything.
while the arabs said "no".
sounds familiar ?
the arabs could have had a state in 1948, but they chose not to.
if they had said yes, no arab from 1948 would have been removed/forced out/fled from his home.
but they said no.
this is the lesson you should learn.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The British made promises to both sides. But according the Treaty of Versailles all the conquered territories "belong to the indigenous inhabitants and communities". In spite of the native Palestinians vehemently opposing the massive Jewish immigration, and demanding immediate autonomy, the British Mandatory Power continued the controversial policy.
Resolution had no legal basis, because the proposed partition was outside the competence of the Assembly under the Charter of the UN.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon the english government gave the balfour declaration which promised a national home to the jews in palestine.
they didn't specify borders of size, true, but a promise was made.
the british kept their promise (for nothing) to the hashemite family in the hussein-mcmahon agreement).
why should they reneg on a promise made to jews ?
before 1917, the turkish owned 85% of the land, the palestinians owned at most in 1948 12.5% of the land. the verssaile treaty explains syria and lebanon ?
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The promise was not made to "the Jews", but to the Zionist movement (in the person of Walter Rothschield).
In the Ottoman periode most of the lands in the rural areas were owned by villages collectively and there was little individual land ownership in the countryside. The attempt by the central government in Istanbul to establish rights of land ownership (for taxation) never succeeded in Palestine and much land became registered under names of high Turkish officials.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon the promise was made specifically for the jews, to have a homeland in palestine.
it didn't specify religious, secular, orthodox, reforms or whatever, just jews.
it also in the declaration didn't mention the word zionism (as far as i can remember), just jews.
the turks were corrupt, for centuries, they earned the nickname the "sickman on the bosporos for a reason".
the locals (who weren't even pretending to be an ethnic nation) never bothered with ownership.
jews did, they thought far.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos That brings me to my earlier assertion, namely that the Zionists from the beginning on sought to disposess and expell the natives of "Eretz Israel". The evidence to this is overwhelming, while evidence of Arab orders is scant, to say the least.
For example, have you ever heared of the "village files"?
adribon 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@adribon the english government gave the balfour declaration which promised a national home to the jews in palestine.
they didn't specify borders of size, true, but a promise was made.
the british kept their promise (for nothing) to the hashemite family in the hussein-mcmahon agreement).
why should they reneg on a promise made to jews ?
before 1917, the turkish owned 85% of the land, the palestinians owned at most in 1948 12.5% of the land. the verssaile treaty explains syria and lebanon ?
haroos 9 months ago
@IRightYouWrong The main human rights organizations tend to be quite independent. (That's why repressive regimes hate them.)
Israel refused to cooperate with an independent inquiry into its assault on Gaza, even though a fervent Zionist would be in charge. This indicates Israel knew the outcome would be highly damaging; an implicit admission of guilt.
For 2½ years Goldstone stood by his commissions findings, until the enormous pressure of the Jewish community became too much to bear.
adribon 9 months ago
@IRightYouWrong On the Gaza assault in 2008/9 Amnesty International concluded:
“[We] found no evidence that Hamas directed the movement of civilians to shield military objectives from attacks. In all of the cases investigated of families killed when their homes were bombed by Israeli forces none of the houses struck was being used by armed groups for military activities. However we did find that Israeli soldiers used civilians, including children, as ‘human shields’, endangeringtheir lives.”
adribon 9 months ago
FUCK HAMAS ISRAEL IS DOING THIER JOB. LONG LIVE ISRAEL!
BEARARMZ 9 months ago
@BEARARMZ /watch?v=l0aEo59c7zU
blackeagle989444 9 months ago
not ambiguous.
they speak specifically about this, why would they write this if it didn't happen ?
this isn't the work of two historians from an indoctrinated columbia university, it's the work of two separate leaders in two countries.
do you think they exchanged notes before writing this ?
do you think they would invent something for no reason ?
if you have a link to this archive tell me, i'll take a look.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Israeli historian Benny Morris wrote on the topic in his book "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem". Google [Khaled al Azm Birth revisited] and read note 95.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon so you hae no link, and your evidence is a historian who had an agenda, who has since made a turn about and blames palestinians for reaching no peace, as far as saying that there can be no peace with them.
again, i remind you, the people who wrote in their books about the lies to the pals, were not historians 40 years after, they were the people who made decisions in real time back then.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Instead of debating the significance of the two Arab accounts, lets look at the evidence the Zionist leaders intended to expel the native population:
In 1937 Ben-Gurion wrote:
"With compulsory transfer we [would] have a vast area [for settlement] ....
I support compulsory transfer. I don't see anything immoral in it."
Moshe Sharett declared in 1947:
"[W]hen the Jewish state is established--it is very possible that the result will be transfer of the Arabs."
adribon 9 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Are you aware of the fact Hamas is much more efficient than Israel at *not* killing civilians, using makeshift rockets and suicide bombings, even though Israel is using state of the art U.S weaponry?
Hamas is a resistance movement, and in order to understand its actions you need to understand the nature of Israel's 44 year long military occupation.
adribon 9 months ago
Who is this Margolis....probably paid by CAIR or HAMAS?
causalidad 9 months ago
America, Your Foreign Policy has been a fucking failure!
deeppurple28 9 months ago
@deeppurple28 According to Noam Chomsky it hasn't... from the perspective of the ruling class that is!
adribon 9 months ago
Double the aid to Israel and it is still a pittance. They have shown the free world the true nature and intent of the global Muslim - conquest.
Without Israel, the radical Muslim nations might have quietly and peacefully built nuclear arsenals. Without Israel, could the world have been convinced that they would use their nukes over, say, a cartoon drawing?
Israel bleeds daily to expose their quest to destroy the 'infidel'. How does one put a price on that?
1208mlassen 9 months ago
@ShaggyAce
Your comment contains more errors than words. Let me mention a few:
-The ceasefire had nothing to do with importing arms
-the embargo imposed by Israel on Gaza is in gross violation of international law
-the israeli embargo was not intended to stop arms entering Gaza, but to collectively punish the population for voting the wrong way
-a state that controls all the borders, coast and air space of a foreign territory is an occupier.
-It is forbidden to acquire land by war
-etc. etc.
adribon 9 months ago
@ShaggyAce
Did you know the cease-fire between the government in Gaza and Israel is repeatedly violated by *Israel*, while Hamas generally respects it, except in reaction to these violations?
According to International Law an occupying power is *fully responsible* for the well being of the population it is occupying. So providing Gaza with water, fuel and electricity would be no more than Israels legal duty!
adribon 9 months ago
@ShaggyAce
You take Israeli propaganda at face value but reject the testimonies of independent observers.
Although Hamas is guilty of terror, this is to a significantly less extent than Israel.
Israel continues to be the occupying power that’s controlling Gaza, and it has imposed a very illegal, barbaric and immoral siege on Gaza, causing the slow death of hundred, even thousands, of Palestinians, the pollution of the water supply, and many problems with access to healthcare, education.
adribon 9 months ago
This guy is fucking ridiculous. You are seriously going to sit there and compare assassinations of Hamas leaders who were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of innocent civillians with suicide bombers targeting children at pizzarias in Israel!??! You are fucking scum. And the Palestinians have recieved just as much financial aid that Israel has if not more, only difference, is the Palestinian leadership used this money to pad its swiss bank accounts and the Israelis spent it on the people!
durhamdf 9 months ago
@durhamdf
Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one-fifth of America's entire foreign aid budget. By all accounts the United States has given more money to Israel than to any other country. The Congressional Research Service’s conservative estimate of total cumulative US aid to Israel (not adjusted for inflation) from 1949 through 2010 is $109.001 billion.
$400 million have been appropriated for economic aid to the Palestinians for 2010.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon yes we invest a little more per capita in Israel because they are a strategic ally in the region (intelligence, access to the Suez cannal in case Egypt closes it again). 100 billion over 60 years would make up 3% of our budget if we paid it all in 2010. And we are careful giving aid to Palestine when it goes to rockets and families of suicide bombers... The PLO, Hamas and Hezbollah have made aid very difficult. If they would use this aid to build infrastructure it would be different
durhamdf 9 months ago
The siege of the US embassy in Tehran in 1979, an event to which Carter had so miserably failed to respond, can be very well used as the day WWIII stepped out of the pages of the Koran and into the current events. I pray the United States, Canada, Australia and Israel lead the world to victory in this war. Come to think of it, there is no choice, be you a Christian, a Jew, or even, believe it or not, a Muslim.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
You must understanding of the “Palestinians'” murderous motives. I am afraid however that you, along with 99% of the population of this planet have missed the beginning of WWIII (the enemy call it Jihad) quite a few years ago.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying again, Mr. Margolis, was its beginning?
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
@NobleCrow10 The Zionist Entity has nothing to do with biblical Israel. Go get an education sucker!
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon
The opposite is true: the so-called "Palestinians" are nothing more than a generic Arabs settled on the Hebrew Land, attracted by Jobs created by Jews and by the Jewish capital. It is time for Arabs to go back home were the came from - 22 Arab country which must accommodate their Muslim brothers. The so- called "Palestinians" should not be Israel problem. With respect to Zionism - like "American Dream", Zionism is a Jewish Dream to assemble Jews on historic Jewish Land. Very Good Idea!
NobleCrow10 9 months ago
@NobleCrow10 This myth was popularized by Joan Peters in het 1984 best-seller "From Time Immemorial". The problem is, the whole book is a fraud. Just read the critiques.
For one, the renown Israeli demographer Roberto Bachi has done extensive research in the past population of Palestine. According to him during the whole Arab periode Jews were only a tiny minority. Around 1800 there were perhaps 5,000-6,500 Jews and some 265,000-325,000 gentiles lived in Palestine.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon peter's critiques are who ?
people who made a career from the political analisys of the conflict, meaning they take a stand and then make their minds accordingly.
what kind of ethics is that ?
as for your numbers, they are not accurate, but not that far off.
so what ?
the jews immigrated to israel with a purpose of building a state, the arabs did what ?
the jews built factories, electricity, they built towns, the arabs did what ?
nothing.
why ?
because to the jews, israel is home.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos This is a variation to the theme the "Jewish return and redemption of the Promised Land".
Pre-Zionist Palestine was far from a backward, destitute wilderness Zionist propaganda claims it to be.
But even if that was the case, did that legitimize the outright theft of the Palestinian people's homes, farms, businesses, banks, cars, buses, schools, etc.? Did that justify the expulsion of the indigenous population to make way for the newly arrived European Jewish refugees?
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon first of all, this IS the case.
jews returned with a purpose of building a state, which is why israel was reclaimed from destitute (as you say).
beyond that, there was a conflict, and as a result of that conflict the arabs refused a settlement and paid for it.
they weren't thrown out, the majority of them were evacuated by arabs, this is documented, including testimonies from arabs.
these aren't stories, it's the truth.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos As early as 1891, Ahad Ha'Am reported upon visiting Palestine for three months:
"We abroad are used to believe the Eretz Yisrael is now almost totally desolate, a desert that is not sowed ..... But in truth that is not the case. Throughout the country it is difficult to find fields that are not sowed. Only sand dunes and stony mountains .... are not cultivated."
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon and what was he refering to ?
the need for jewish lands, which was hard.
he supported whole heartedly a founding of a jewish state.
your words are out of context, the land owners he talked about were arabs, and they refused to sell GOOD lands.
but the jews bought any lands that were for sale, BOUGHT, and made it flourish.
he specifically said that the arabs didn't bother with lands that were hard to use.
do me a favor, at least qoute properly.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Ahad Ha'Am also wrote: "We are used to thinking of the Arabs as primitive men of the desert, as a donkey-like nation that neither sees nor understands what is going around it. But this is a GREAT ERROR. The Arab, like all sons of Sham, has sharp and crafty mind . . . Should time come when life of our people in Palestine imposes to a smaller or greater extent on the natives, they WILL NOT easily step aside."
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon so ?
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos So we have an important early Zionist telling that Palestine's lands was extensively cultivated by the natives who he perceives as far from being naive or backwards.
Hardly anything the hasbara claims can withstand scrutiny... doesn't that bother you?
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon no, we have an early zionist who was not a land worker and had no idea of the kind of agriculture that israel would produce saying that.
big deal.
back then the hebrew language was barely spoken.
building a country is not easy, and requires alot of effort and learning.
no country was built in a day, right ?
hasbara ?
there is no propoganda in the truth.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The more damaging the truth, the more money is spent in spreading lies. Take a close look at what you've been told about Israel's history, and you'll never be the same again.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon that's a generalized slogen, what's you've said,
if there is meat to your words, then put it on the table.
you're saying nothing realy.
before you said that the "stories" that the palestinains were told to leave by arab countries, are lies, but there is proof of that.
you ignore that ?
i am from israel, if there's anything in israel's history you wish to "explain" to me, go ahead, let's see what "facts" YOU were told, and what facts i was told.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos The Israeli propagande claim of Arab radio broadcasts urging the Palestinians to leave, was conclusively demolished by Erskine Childers and Walid Khalidi in the early 1960s. They showed the back files of the Near East monitoring stations of the British and US governments (both of which covered all the Arab radio stations, but local news papers as well) contained no evidence of such arab orders.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon lol, you're pathetic.
abu mazen himself wrote a book where he admits to this.
the prime minister of syria at the time and the prime minister of iraq at a time both confirm this in books they wrote.
talk about propoganda of lies you believe in.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Those are quotes are taken largely out of context with their meaning distorted. Mahmoud Abbas said the Arab armies forced the Palestinians to leave by *abandoning* them, so not by *intention*!
adribon 9 months ago
@haroos
Israeli propaganda has largely relinquished the claim that the Palestinian exodus of 1948 was 'self-inspired'. Official circles implicitly concede that the Arab population fled as a result of Israeli action - whether directly, as in the case of Lydda and Ramleh, or indirectly, due to the panic that and similar actions (the Deir Yassin massacre) inspired in Arab population centers throughout Palestine.
Again: no direct evidence has ever been found.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon prime minister of syria at the time admits it, prime minister of iraq at the time admits to it, abu mazen admits to it.
what mroe do you need ?
the very leaders of two of the arab countries, and the filthy abu mazen openly admitted that they lied to palestinians (the first two) and abu mazen accuses the arab leadership of lying to his people.
enough is enough.
i'm not saying there were no other reasons, but this was the major one.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Except for quotes which could be interpreted both ways, not *one* record of such orders coming from the Arab leadership has been found. To have been a major factor for the flight of 700,000 people you'd expect massive evidence. On the other hand plenty of orders to the population to stay put have been found.
And from the point of view of miliary logistics the claim makes no sense at all. The Arab armies needed the help of the local population for food, manpower and information.
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon found where ?
who found them ? those orders.
i assume not israel, cause israel is evil and not say the truth, so the orders are in ... the arab world ?
the same world that they treat women with honor ?
prime ministers admit to misleading the palestinians and these are just "qoutes that could be interperted in two ways" ?
qoutes that come from memoires of these two prime ministers ?
please.
do yourself a favor, open your eyes.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Britan and the US recorded *all* radio frequencies in the Middle East. In this massive archive of sound recordings not one appeal to the Palestinians to leave their homes has been identified. The same applied for all the local news papers. Nothing which even resembles an order to leave their homes. What the data does show is repeated calls to *stay put*!
In the light of this evidence, some ambiguous Arab quotes from many years later is irrelevant.
adribon 9 months ago
@haroos
UN Resolution 181 proposed giving 56% of Palestine to the Jewish immigrants, who made up just 1/3 of the population, and possessed only 7% of the territory. The mistake many people make about the partition plan is that it was never implemented!
Days after the vote the Jewish Agency initiated Plan Dalet, a military campaign against the natives in order to expel them. They succeeded in removing some 80% of the gentiles. Arab leaders *never* called on the Palestinians to leave!
adribon 9 months ago
@adribon where on earth are you getting this shit from ?
the arabs attacked israel, they called on arabs in israel to leave until the zionists were thrown out.
that is documented !!
you're crazy if you think israel attcked on 3 fronts on purpose !
by the way, the palestinians and arabs as a whole rejected the un partition plan, do you at least agree to that ?
oh, and it's true that the jews got 55% of the land, but of 85% of THOSE lands were arid desert lands.
haroos 9 months ago
@haroos Various scholars have done extensive research in the archives of the war and have found absolutely no evidence to the claim by the Zionists that the Palestinians were asked to leave by the Arabs leaders. Moreover Israel has never pointed to any specific instance. It was merely a propaganda lie.
The 56% of the area allocated to the Zionist movement included the most fertile parts of Palestine. Indeed, the native Palestinians rejected the partition of their homeland. Wouldn't you too?
adribon 9 months ago
In fact, there is only one way to achieve piece in the Middle East. Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 60 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
The so called “Palestinians” have only one motivation: the destruction of Israel, and in my book that is not sufficient to consider them a “nation” — or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it “Palestinian people” and installed it in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
Mr Margolis, here is a sarcastic question: If the people you mistakenly call “Palestinians” are anything but generic Arabs collected from all over — or thrown out of — the Arab world, if they really have a genuine ethnic identity that gives them right for self-determination, why did they never try to become independent until Arabs suffered their devastating defeat in the Six Day War?
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
While I am writing, Khomeini's Iran is working towards the Bomb. And if you're honest with yourself, you know that Israel is the only country that can, and will, do something about it. Israel will, out of necessity, act in a way that is the not the norm, and you'd better hope that they do it in a destructive manner. Any sane person would rather have a rogue Israel than a Nuclear Iran.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
Israel willfully and forcefully disregards international law. In 1981 Israel destroyed Osirak -- Sadam Hussein’s nuclear bomb lab. Every government in the world knew that Hussein was building a bomb. And they did nothing. Except for Israel. Yes, in doing so they broke international law and custom. But they also saved us all from a nuclear Iraq. That rogue action should earn Israel a place of respect in the eyes of all freedom-loving peoples. But it hasn't.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
Most countries in the Middle East are Theocracies and Autocracies. But Israel is the sole, the only, the rogue, democracy. Out of every country in the Middle East, only in Israel do anti-government protests and reporting go un-quashed and uncensored.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
In Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, and Syria, homosexual conduct is punishable by flogging, imprisonment, or both. But homosexuals there get off pretty lightly compared to their counterparts in Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen, who are put to death. Israeli homosexuals can adopt, openly serve in the army, enter civil unions, and are protected by exceptionally strongly worded ant-discrimination legislation.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
When you compare Israel to its regional neighbors, it becomes clear just how roguish Israel is. And here is the fourth argument: Israel has a better human rights record than any of its neighbors. At no point in history, has there ever been a liberal democratic state in the Middle East -- except for Israel. Of all the countries in the Middle East, Israel is the only one where the LGBT community enjoys even a small measure of equality.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
You would never see the Spanish government in peace talks with the leaders of the ETA -- the British government would never negotiate with Thomas Murphy, Russian PM Putin with Chechen Basaev. And if President Obama were to sit down and talk about peace with Osama Bin Laden, the world would view this as insanity. But Israel can do the exact same thing -- and earn international praise in the process. That is the dictionary definition of rogue -- behaving in a way that is unexpected, or not normal.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
Abed Rabbo also used to be a leader of the PFLP -- an organization of “freedom fighters” that, under Abed Rabbo’s leadership, engaged in such freedom-promoting activities as killing 22 Israeli high school students. And the Israeli government is sending delegates to sit at a table with this man, and talk about peace. And the world applauds.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
I have problem with the fact that the Israeli government engages in an activity which the rest of the world shuns -- it negotiates with terrorists. Forget the late PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, a man who died with blood all over his hands -- they're in the process of negotiating with terrorists as we speak. Yasser Abed Rabbo is one of the lead PLO negotiators that has been sent to the peace talks with Israel.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
During “Great Arab Revolt” of 1936-1939, in which “Palestinians” enthusiastically participated and which Germany funded, the swastika was used as a mark of identity on Arab leaflets and graffiti. Arab children welcomed each other with Hitler salute, and pictures of Hitler were displayed at celebrations. The identification was so strong that travelers through areas of the “Palestinian” Arabs revolt learned that it was prudent to attach a swastika to their car to ward off attacks by Arab snipers.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Islam followers (“Palestinian” Arabs inclusive) easily transplanted into the Arab world a newly Nazified form of traditional Muslim Jew-hatred, with Arab translation of Hitler “Mein Kampf” (translated into Arabic as “My Jihad”) and other Nazi anti-Semitic works, including “Der Sturmer” hate cartoons, adapted to portray the Jew as the demonic enemy of Allah.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Both Nazism and Islam are explicitly anti-nationalist in the sense that they believe in the liquidation of the nation state in a favor of trans-national unifying community: in Islam the “umma” (community of all believers); and in Nazism the “herrenvolk” (master race). Both worshiped the unifying totalitarian figure of the Caliph or Furer. And both rapidly hated the Jews and sought their destruction.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Muslim brotherhood (HAMAS is part of it) found a soul mate in Nazi Germany. Both movements sought world conquest and domination. Both were triumphalist and supremacist: in Nazism the Aryan must rule, while in Islam, the Muslim religion must hold domination. Both advocates subordination of the individual to a folkish central power.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Muslim groups which today threaten the West with terrorism, subversion and insurgency, and which, in their own words, seek to bring about a global totalitarian empire are not only fascist in the broad sociological sense, but can trace their literal historical origins to Nazism and its genocidal ambitions.
NobleCrow10 10 months ago
Long live the resistance against the Zionist occupation.
Israel: Top terrorist organisation.
Sponsored by = United States of America.
Specializes in= Occupying other peoples land, destroying homes, oppressing and numerous of other crimes. Also telling America to go to war for them.
Religion= Jewish. Not always religious though.
Ideology= Believes they are superior to non-Jews. Sees Palestinians as sub-human.
ToExistIsToResist 10 months ago
Comment removed
ToExistIsToResist 10 months ago
AMERICA=largets TERRORIST.
ISREAL IDF= 2nd largest TERRORIST!
mabo612 10 months ago
HAMAS ARE KILLERS AND TERRORISTS
flYinjaZZ 10 months ago
HAMAS =TERRORIST WE HATE HAMAS
MrBoris552 10 months ago
@MrBoris552
jews have names like boris? lol
freeshyne1234 10 months ago
@freeshyne1234 for you my name is : mr gotofuckyourmother
MrBoris552 7 months ago
@MrBoris552
Jews have names like gotofuckyourmother?
freeshyne1234 7 months ago
3- and if u an Arab they just destroy ur house for no reason but to send u out
Happen very day , wat u Shuld do !?!
nathengreen 10 months ago
2- any jew who kill the Muslim who live in 1948 land occupied Palestine will never charge for murder by jews state & law
nathengreen 10 months ago
The jews been killin civilians since1940
Tell today , now the time had come for them to be killed, cuz thy r brthers of monkiis
nathengreen 10 months ago
1-he jews and zionist who built an a terro state in the land of Muslims in1948 & b4 & aftr killin the civilians tell today =
nathengreen 10 months ago
HAMAS ARE KILLERS.
ellas365411 10 months ago
FALASTIN W BASS
falastinwirror 11 months ago
This interviewer is not as bad as alot of western journalists but he is still eager to show that he's a good little Jew/Israel bootlicker.
ActaNonVerba71 11 months ago
Crazy Islamist fuck tards. I shit on them and their religion of pompous bullshit
Gonzoidz 11 months ago
r u retrd? this is fuking bollx u shitthread i hav nothing 2 say but fuk off u chinese bastard. seriously though, saruman was a cunt.
smellygoth 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrSouthphillyitalian 1 year ago
@MrSouthphillyitalian
Prove it fuckface
Ezzedeen01 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrSouthphillyitalian 1 year ago
@Ezzedeen01 Prove what buddy
MrSouthphillyitalian 1 year ago