Added: 2 years ago
From: IronHeadBison
Views: 18,968
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • miss the GBA graphics

  • so different then rekka no ken and blazing sword which i think are the same things

  • I personally liked Path of Radiance and Radiant Dawn better, mostly because they had the Laguz instead of just some random half-humans...Still, this game is pretty fun :P

  • I like the graphics, but i just wish it was a little more colorful...

  • @GamingRetrospective it is he just has a bad camera

  • Man... The GBA animations FAIL so much. Shadow Dragon animation FTW. Screw blazing sword. Game fails so hard.

  • @09XGT are you a faggot trool or what, fire emblem is fire emblem. NEVER dis the classics. maybe you did not grow up with the games but sacred stones and thracia776 are the best IMO.

  • @XxRioTxNinJAxX Fuck off you gay cock fag piece of shit, go suck on a pencil you gay fucking nigger. Shadow Dragon pwns GBA series. You're just asshurt because you kept using Jagen in every level.

  • @XxRioTxNinJAxX Oh and I did play Sacred Stones. Mega incest inside along with a gay homosexual faggot who really wanted to fuck Ephraim's sister hard. We also have 2 gay niggers on an adventure to stop undead zombie rapers. Thracia is a hard ass piece of crap where you have to put your balls in steel where you use overused shit heads like Othin and Marita then killing fuck fag Beldo. Don't judge me you cock sucking piece of shit Shadow Dragon owns and stop crying about your faggot fantasy.

  • @09XGT ... you have to freaking admit for a 2003 GBA game it had some effing EPIC animations. you might think they fail but look at the time period and when it was done. Plus Shadow Dragon is just an evolution of those animations with better graphics and the movement is more fluid. Nothings changed. its just slower and more fluid then what the originals were

  • Comment removed

  • @09XGT and some models that got remade sot he animations are different (Plus the new classes)

  • Holy shit the GBA ones look WAAAAAAAAAAY better than this!

    Fire Embelm 7 is best!

  • Comment removed

  • this is the nitendo ds version?

  • @RequestChipmunk no, (Sarcasm) is the double screen version

  • gotta love those gba sound Effects

  • @TODhaseo Yeah but it's pretty sad that they dropped the GBA battle music, it was much better IMO

  • about what the villager in the 2nd house visited said... Archer/Hunter/Sniper VS Pg. Knigth/Dracoknight, Bowmen win.

  • it looks okay but they all look so retarded in battle

  • That overworld theme gets annoying after a while. I'm glad it changes once you get deeper into the game. Also, their movement range is too big.

  • does this game have fights with turns or no turns?

  • whit turn

  • doing the prologue actually can increase a character's stats

  • i killed frey in the tutorial :X i hope hes not a good character later on xD

  • You should have sacrificed Jagen instead ....

    He just sucks, Frey is a good character!

  • but hes my tank Dx without him i wouldn't be able to get to the other chapters....

  • Jagen sucks, he's like Marcus from the gba Fire Emblems. If you wanted a piece of meat to throw at the enemy so you could recruit others, you shuld have used Draug. Frey is OK, but Hardin is better though. However, Cain is the worst, so you should have picked Cain as your sacrifice.

  • No...any SMART player would have thrown away Jeigan during the prologue....because Jeigan has basically no use outside of...being thrown away....

    Frey (the canonical sacrifice) is actually better than BOTH Cain AND Abel. He'll come out on top out of all the cavaliers.

    Roshea (one of Hardin's soldiers) is a pretty good soldier, but he looks too much like a girl...

    If she WAS a girl, she'd be a good support for some of the other characters (except wolf!!)

  • I know all that. Its a choice between Jagen and Cain, and I hate Cain more because i heard Jagen is decent as a Swordsmaster.

  • @Demonhornz You should have sacrificed Jagen, because he seems to be good at start, because he is pre-promoted. But pre-promoted units do not gain experience very quickly and suffer from poor stat growths. This means that, after a few chapters, Jagen won't be so good to use anymore.

    And while Cain isn't bad, he's not as good as Frey and Abel. As long as you have either Frey or Abel in your group, you do not need to spend any time with Cain.

  • @brakyz I think I know that. I sacrificed Cain because i wasn't going to use him and I was trusting in Frey and Hardin to be my horsebacks. I let Jagen fill a "Marcus" role, as in i didn't train him at all specifically but let him weaken units for the others and such. This role was better than keeping Cain, don't you agree? Cain can't even do anything like Jagen can without training.

  • @Demonhornz Cain's performance once he's raised is well worth the cost it takes to raise him, especially considering his great mobility which allows him to get levels under his belt and his great growths (well, by FE11 standards).

  • But still it's obvious, Wolf and Sedgar are the best of the pack

  • @LOLNOOBCAKES I disagree. If u train Frey and Abel from the start of the game, those to are the best Cavaliers/Paladins in the game. I got this from a character guide:

    Frey: Frey is probably the best Cavalier/Paladin in the game, you should definitely use him all the time.

    Abel: Abel is also a very decent Cavalier that should be on your team if you have room for him. If you're playing hard mode, then replace the missing Frey with Abel.

  • i seen that... my frey; lv1 paladin with 22 skill. i <3 frey

  • i got too Fire Emblem shadow dragon to nintendo ds and i love this game

  • my frey lv 20 cav lv 20 pally also i agree how do you do that?!

  • How the hell do they record a DS so perfectly!?

  • It's not actually a DS, it's an emulator. It simulates the game on the computer, and they're able to record it digitally from that.

  • Is that true? I mean, it's really good quality. It's hard to tell.

  • Well, emulators are easy to come by, but good video recording software isn't. :P The emulator is most likely free, but the video software they probably bought.

  • Gawd o_O

    I wish I had one of those, I could record DS games perfectly.

  • Yeah, except you have to download emulated games online, and use the computer to play them, so it's not like if you had a saved game on your DS you could record it, you would have to have a saved game on the computer..and it's not nearly as fun, lol. :P

    But just wait, I'm sure they'll have something out in the next few years at least on the DSi as an application for recording. For now I wouldn't worry about it too much. All we can do is hope :P

  • Yeah, you're right. At least I can use a camera, but I don't actually want to do it and if something like that comes out, it would be quite complicated, I bet.

  • You have no idea what you're talking about... The press doesn't use freeware emulation to record stuff like this. -_-

  • No shit, he's asking how he can do this himself.

  • Yeah; it's an emulator for sure. The sound is off.

  • Comment removed

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more