Moon hoax: Naut curses at 47 secs

[77GSlinger]

How is it that there is absolutely no lag time at all when the astro-not talks to the psyentists at Houston MIssion CONTROL?

To me that is even more convincing than the obvious wires he he hanging from and being yanked around by!

[yourmajezty]

love your vids exposing the truth

[yahokobbenyah]

He's a puppet!

[gregrutz]

They now have picture of the landing sites from a lunar orbitor showing the stuff they left behind. Moon landing proven. Normal people knew we went there all along.

[pt1gard]

@gregrutz lmfao, really, shilly? they faked the missions poorly and this photoshop is worse than that>

next question, rebuttal please?

[gregrutz]

@pt1gard I don't think you understand, you can see the landing sites from an independent satellite picture. You can bounce signals off the mirror they left behind.

[pt1gard]

@gregrutz ... really will you link definitive clear pics not funded by Nasa? please show these phony BS tricks that you claim prove man went to moon ... the mirrors? u kidding me, in '62 they bounced lasers off the moon w/o mirrors, so save that old carny trick

[MasterJonzo]

@pt1gard

Rebuttal not required, as he had already proven it's not a conspiracy.

[BackInTheCage]

@pt1gard Oh ffs, you wouldn't believe it if you were staring at them on the moon.

[pt1gard]

@BackInTheCage ... dont quit your day job, Dangerfield

[kaycorey1]

@gregrutz ya a fake picture idiot

[kaycorey1]

0:58 WTF?!!?

[pt1gard]

@kaycorey1 ... watch all my vids, these missions were staged one earth, there is no doubt

[danmo783]

AS far as the moon goes, we false flagged it against the Russians. Over 90% of their population believes we faked going to the moon during the cold war. Those 90% are right. We are so far behind in space technology and now Osama, I mean Obama shut down the space shuttle program. I wonder who paid for that. NASA went to the moon in the 60s and 70s with shit technology but cannot go back for a fraction of the cost considering the steep drop in electronics, computers, and materials. Moon HOAX, duh.

[pt1gard]

@danmo783 ... thanks for the post, you are 100% right... this sham needs to be revealed to more and more people, once one figures it out the rest crumbles

[BjornPalmen]

This is genuine footage of Harrison Schmitt walking on the Moon (Apollo 17, 1972).

Wires must be anchored somewhere above the astronaut, no such arrangements are seen. Also the puppeteers must be hidden somewhere!

So there are no puppeteers, no wires. This is a real Moon walk in 1/6th gravity.

[pt1gard]

@BjornPalmen ... what are U blathering about, Borg? the naut is dragged all over the place and curses bc he is pissed at the puppeteer .... get a reality check and stop shilling .... stop posting unless you can prove us/me wrong

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard The astronaut cannot be "dragged" horisontally and then lifted vertically. The complicated crane needed for that would be seen and catch clear shadows. So there is no dragging -- lifting system. It is all a figment of your mind. A rather idiotic figment, really!

[pt1gard]

@BjornPalmen ... how does he goes backawards then genius swede?  why does he curse ... why do nauts askabout guys wih hoses? where is the dust on the lunar landing leg buckets? why are there no tracks behind in front or under the LR in many pics ... and oh yeah, dumbshit, google this and explain?

"AS17-140-21370" lmfao

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard You are good at inventing impossible questions. How should I know why you cannot see lunar rover tracks in some pictures? The lightning conditions may be unfavorable?

Why do you think there should be dust on the landing legs??

The remark about hoses (if that is what he says) could be some kind of joke, hoses would clean away dust on the astronauts if there was water in abundance. AS17-140-21370 is taken in backlight, a lot of light is reflected from the bright surface of the Moon.

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard "why are there no tracks" -- There are EXCELLENT tracks all over the moon as seen in the same picture AS17-140-21370. Why have you not LOOKED at that picture? EXPLAIN!

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard I can prove you wrong. The Apollo 17 astronauts brought 200+ kg moon rocks to Earth.

If you have seen ANY puppet show, the puppets NEVER curse their puppeteer.

The puppeteer on the Moon is your most unlikely invention and you have no grounds for it whatsoever.

[pt1gard]

@BjornPalmen ... lmao shilly, are those the petrified wood moon rocks Neil handed off to the Dutch ambassador ... you are history .... and as far as your other nonsense posts, so great there are tracks, have you seen the dozens of other pics with none? explain ... banned!

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard Neil and Buzz gave queen Juliana a Dutch flag that had made the journey to the Moon and back. They never gave rocks to anybody. There are no pictures of rocks handed over.

The petrified rock was wrongly assumed to be a moon rock 40 years after Neil's and Buzz's visit to the Netherlands. It is thousands of years old because wood turns to stone (petrifies) very slowly.

Lighting conditions make the tracks difficult to see. Tracks start and stop all over the Moon... a crane? :-D

[pt1gard]

@BjornPalmen ... ur lying again, it was petrified wood, period ...

google this, shilly ....

AS17-137-20979

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard -- I never lie. Everybody is not like you.

The petrified wood had NOTHING to do with Apollo. It was just wrongly assumed to be a moon rock.

AS17-137-20979 shows the first Rover repair undertaken on the Moon. A missing fender was improvised with chart pages and duct tape. The Rover did not have all its 4 wheels on the ground all the time as it was driven rather fast.

[pt1gard]

@BjornPalmen ... god what a fucking shill ur, i cant stop laughing, fenders and wheelies

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard Anybody can see that your comments here are a curious mixture of rude insults and pure idiocy.

[IamRay71]

I love popping bubbles on this one. I still meet brainwashed tools that believe that this was real. Mythbusters is nothing more than G'ment propaganda to keep your attention while they fire up the gas ovens for the REAL holocaust. Beware in these days, keep exposing lies. The power of the lamb overcomes the beast, remember.

[Philsco]

@IamRay71 Well put.

[pt1gard]

@IamRay71 ... nice to enlist one more comrade in these sea of lies the gov has foisted on sheep.... the apollo program like so many more is too obvious to deny with 10 hours of honest research

[BjornPalmen]

@IamRay71 The brain of the lamb is delicious but useless in a debate.

[pt1gard]

@JamesMorlan ... ha, he's yanked back any third grader can see it, defines all laws on earth or space--you are purblind to a hoax, its ok, shilly :)

[pt1gard]

great, hey ed, will you come on the radio and debate me and others on the moon, we love pigeons who have never looked into it and really love shills

[JamesMorlan]

@pt1gard I'd love to hear your radio debates. I bet you just call people shills and talk down to them like they don't know shit, yet all the while are incapable of providing a shred of verifiable evidence that anything that had anything to do with the Apollo program was in any way faked. The only thing wrong with this video is the way you're looking at it. You're a conspiracy theorist crackpot who denies one of man's greatest achievements because of some inferiority complex. Get over it.

[pt1gard]

@JamesMorlan ... hey there you are shilly, can you define a CT? go on oracle and you can listen to hours of the moon debates ... truth hertz is the host .... how many hours have you spent looking into it, my cognitive dissonance?

[JamesMorlan]

@pt1gard I've spent countless hours looking into it, and have debunked countless foolish claims about the moon landings being a hoax. You can spin it all you want, but have you looked at the recent LRO images showing the Apollo descent stages and flags and foot trails, right where the astronauts left them? I didn't think so. You'd probably just dismiss it as a Photoshop job, anyway.

[pt1gard]

@JamesMorlan /// LAUGHING MY MOTHER FUCKING ASS OFF ... the LROs????!!!!

only a true shill pushes that garbage ... troll on, dip shit

[JamesMorlan]

@pt1gard The louder you laugh, the more obvious it is that you know the truth is gonna shut you up one day.

[pt1gard]

@JamesMorlan ... stick to the facts, "why no tracks behind or under the LR in many pics when it's obviously been driven far from LM?"

also you didnt answer the hose question; put up or get lost, scum shill

[JamesMorlan]

@pt1gard LOL!!! The reason you can't find my answer is because you're looking at the wrong video. LOL!!!

As for LR tracks, you'll have to cite specific photos along with evidence to support when and where they were taken (since you claim they were "obviously" far from the LEM. And it is LEM, not LM, by the way. Lunar Excursion Module. Can you say excursion? Good boy. Have a snack...and some water.

[pt1gard]

@JamesMorlan ... no doofus, look at my Colette, vid, you are a troll ... i saw your feud on your channel, exposed by others

[JamesMorlan]

@pt1gard What feud might that be, O Enlightened One?

[JamesMorlan]

@pt1gard Saw your Colette video. That's it?! That's all you got? Jesus, what a waste of time.

By the way, unlike some people, astronauts have a sense of humor. The hoses reference in your pet Apollo 17 video is a humorous reference to the hoses they are used to seeing during the many hours they spent in underwater simulations before their trip to the moon. Not sure why I felt compelled to tell you that. Probably felt sorry that you couldn't figure it out yourself.

[pt1gard]

@JamesMorlan ... lmao, you fucking shill, you guys kill me, ever seen the air bubbles in space? underwater simulations were same shit in space ... check your sources! :)

[JamesMorlan]

@pt1gard There are no air bubbles in space.  WTF are you talking about now? You're babbling and not making any sense. I checked my sources. What are your sources? YouTube videos and confirmation bias? Or do you like to just make your own shit up and spin it? Keep on laughing. Just keep on laughing. That's what naysayers do. Just laugh off the truth, as if that could change it.

[pt1gard]

@JamesMorlan ... ur going in circles, you lied about colette, you lie about hoses, you lie about the bubbles, you cant explain why no dust is on frisbee landers, or how armstrong never got the buggy up on earth, or why the naut curses here and is yanked back, or how the shotput video proves the pack is jerked opposite his fall, or how the nauts were all fearfully lying on their first PC, or why baron was offed like Gus, or why there are footprints and not tire tracks around the LM--FRAUD CUBED

[BjornPalmen]

@JamesMorlan The "LEM" was dropped after Apollo 11, now it is just LM, the Lunar Module.

It is somewhat unclear what was meant with "excursion", probably that it was designed to leave the Command and Sdervice Module in orbit around the Moon and make its own "excursion" to the Surface of the Moon.

[BjornPalmen]

@JamesMorlan Lighting conditions make tracks hard to see. But they can be seen from space (LRO).

After all, you are trying to see gray Moon dust against more Moon dust. Why do you think the tracks should be darker (or lighter) than the surrounding surface?

[DisinfoOperative]

@pt1gard ha i'd love to hear this. Where and when can i find it?

[pt1gard]

@DisinfoOperative ... this is off nasa's site, its as much as there is

[DisinfoOperative]

@pt1gard I was askin about the radio show talking to pigeons and shills. lol I want a catch some of that action.

[BjornPalmen]

@DisinfoOperative You cannot find it anywhere because he just made it up.

So it is lies and pure fantasy. PC means the Apollo 11 Press Conference. That the astronauts were fearfully lying is pure invention. Baron was run over by a train AFTER he had reported on Apollo 1 problems. Murdering by train seems a little farfetched. Gus is Gus Grissom who was killed in the Apollo 1 fire as were Ed White and Roger Chaffee. That was an accident. pt1gard seems to think that it was murder 3 to get 1.

[edmfw]

More nonsense posted by an someone silly enough to believe a lie.

[YDDES]

A guy with a heavy spacesuit couldn't hang in just one thin, "invisible" wire fastened in his backpack. Also: These videos are highly compressed. You can't determine that a "glimpse" for example, as seen here, really exists on the original video.

[dalek14mc]

Cursing is proof of a hoax? Pt1gard, I think you'r getting desperate. I think you should learn more about 1/6 gravity in a vacuum before posting anymore videos.

[pt1gard]

@dalek14mc ... does 1/100th gravity allow someone to move backwards like this Naut?

[dalek14mc]

@pt1gard-Yes, as a matter of fact, it would cause him to move back much farther. 

[pt1gard]

@pt1gard ... really, so when you fall down yourself, you always go backwards instead of up?

[cavanuk]

So easy for people to comment who know so little.... Wires - antennae and lens flares. Yanked = bending in low gravity in a suit that isn't flexible. The tension in the suit leg will cause it to straighten and the guy has a heavy back pack on his back. These guys sweat buckets because of their exertions.

[cavanuk]

With an open mind I see nothing odd between 30 and 40 secs. There is nothing unusual above the backpack in this segment. There is the antenna and distortion caused by the poor film quality but they occur all over the scene.

[pt1gard]

@cavanuk ,,, course u dont see anything strange, you are purblind and a shill, hes dragged backwards and defies newtons laws

[nickeyx2]

you do realize that at the back of their backpacks there is a antenna sticking out like 15-20 inches thats for the radio signal so this is what you "wires" are and those bright spots sometimes are lense flares caused by then sun and why does he get up like that? idk maybe becuase hes in 1/3 gravity than the earth and most likely it would be easier to get up.

[pt1gard]

@nickeyx2 ... thanks, yes i know they have antenna at times, whats funny its not there in many photos .... also there are wires, they have been seen many times extending much higher with pings

[nickeyx2]

@pt1gard dont you think that might be the the flares from the sun to the camera

[pt1gard]

@nickeyx2 ... def some of them are from antenna, not denying that, but look at all my vids, including enter this into YT: "MOON HOAX: top of backpack's triangular cloth pulled by wire freeze @ 35 secs"

watch closely and with open mind and explain it to me--it shows something is def attached to the backpack and pulling it up, watch several times and slow down and freeze at 30-40 secs or so

[nickeyx2]

@pt1gard all i saw was naut walking and the antena nothing unusual happening

[pt1gard]

@nickeyx2 ... like i said slow it down and watch the wire pull the cloth, you have to be diligent but to me and many others it proves there is a wire ... of course if people dont wanna see it they dont ... I used ot believe we went to moon but see too much evidence proving otherwise, like the one i told you to watch

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard The back flap is moving because the astronaut is moving.

Why on earth (I mean Moon) would anybody attach a wire to a back flap??

Your theory stinks.

[BjornPalmen]

@pt1gard Then you should know that the antennas are flat, like rulers at school, and only flash at certain angles.

[THREESIXNINE100]

@nickeyx2 the antenna is 10 1/2" on the moon there 1/6 gravity

[klin1klinom]

Looks like he made an effort to get back up on his own. Made a pause thinking over the move just before pushing off the soil with his hand. The way he fell also looked natural, as he realized he's loosing a balance he panicked, made an attempt to straighten up with his leg and pushed himself completely off the balance.

[thegreatterror]

people are getting lost in all the technical space shit look deeper then that. look at the top of his pack behind his head and not just this video either but many wires are seen constantly and they use wires to give the illusion of zero gravity while they also slow down the video to make it look like theyre bouncing around. no wire hugh? 12 seconds, 54 seconds wire gleams off the light above his head fake as all hell

[pt1gard]

@thegreatterror ... agree 100% IN PLAIN SITE or EYES WIDE SHUT ... kubrick was sending a message and died for it .... people use common sense, man will not go to moon EVER

[djgeeter]

@pt1gard thank god someone else that knows KUBRICK was the poor bastard NASA MADE fake the moon landing....his wife always said he was scared they would come for him......

[BjornPalmen]

@djgeeter Stanley Kubrick made lunar landscapes for his film 2001: A Space Odyssey.

They look nothing like the real Moon: there is no moon dust and no small craters.

[THREESIXNINE100]

@thegreatterror you are so right ....... little thing like this just prove the moon landing was all ahoax

[BjornPalmen]

@THREESIXNINE100 the little thing is your brain

[elevenby2]

HE IS ON THE MOON! WATCH THE WAVES AROUND HIM ONCE HE HAS FALLEN DOWN! CAN YOU SEE HOW FAST AND FAR THEY GO? HAVE YOU EVER SEEN THIS KIND OF SITUATION ON EARTH? NO! INSTEAD OF CHATTING... GET SOME PHYSIC MESUREMENT AND YOU WILL REALIZE THAT IT IS NOT FAKED.

[pt1gard]

@elevenby2 ... only simpletons type in caps only, plus they can speed or slow the film village idiot .... whys the naut curse??? bc his puppeteer yanks him, then he magically slides backwards, hilarious, eh, shilly :)

[djgeeter]

@elevenby2 physic measurement??? like common sense and not typing in ALL CAPS ??

[elevenby2]

@djgeeter my english might not be good or proper but get to the point sweety: the wave around the astonauts still remain and for sure that can prove they're not in a studio! try to slow down vibration waves ..you puppet! don't you see that are still fast? that means that the film is at the right speed. PPPUUUUUPPPETTTTTT!!

[planetcheck]

The reason he fell is due to the backpack, not the weight of it but the packpack itself.

It weighs 200 pounds on Earth.

On the Moon it weighs only 50 pounds.

But it is high and cumbersome to wear and weighs 50 pounds.

So when he bent down to pick something up, that 50 pounds pushed him forwards.

Try it on Earth.

Wear a backpack that is high and weighs 50 pounds and bend down to pick something up.

You will go forwards like he did and fall.

And lets not forget the boots he is wearing.

[pt1gard]

@planetcheck ... actually its 33 pounds

[tpsossff]

Oh god, not more wires rubbish. IF THEY WERE FAKING IT WHY WOULD THEY NEED WIRES?

A TRAINING SUIT AND BACKPACK LIKE THEY USED ON EARTH WEIGHS ABOUT A QUARTER OF THE REAL THING.

[TruthWillSetUFree911]

Thanks for posting the video. Now one can better understand why NASA taped over their high resolution video feed from the moon, it was too revealing.

[pt1gard]

@TruthWillSetUFree911 ... ur welcome, if one delves deep enough into the nasa files you will find all sorts of garbage

[BjornPalmen]

@TruthWillSetUFree911 Of course you realize that the "high resolution video feed from the moon" was recorded all over the world? Taping over the original video feed does not change a thing.

[derekxnl]

I think we should send moon hoax proponents to the moon on a one way ticket. Explain the motion of the moon dust that gets kicked up as the Astronaut is struggling to find his center of mass again after falling over. Why the dust seem to just glide right across the surface? Explain that using real physics.

[JPLyokoWarrior]

The 'yank forward' appears to be nothing more than his left foot slipping on the, as I've said previously, very fine lunar dust, leaving the rest of him to fall flat on his face. The subsequent 'yank backward' is him pushing with his left hand to reseat himself. As for the 'wire blip', whatever it may be, lens flare, comm antenna, or whatever, it is in entirely the wrong location and doesn't move with the astronaut well enough to be a support wire.

[pt1gard]

@JPLyokoWarrior .. shilly, you are killing me. try it on the sheep.... this proves to anyone with an open mind this man was on wires

[JPLyokoWarrior]

@pt1gard I don't take kindly to direct, personal insults, and I don't think the general public does, either. When he stumbles forward, watch his left foot (in the back of the frame) and then his left hand when he rights himself. See for yourself.

I am no trusting fool, and I do not form my ideas based on the 'official' story. I do my homework, and I will not have you insulting my academic honor when I tell you exactly what I (not the government) see in this footage.

[pt1gard]

@JPLyokoWarrior ... lmfao academic honor?? so you need to go to school to understand the lies of apollo, 911, holocaust, lavon affair and uss liberty? .... you slay me, shilly .... you think any of the nauts would EVER submit to a polygraph??? not on your friggin transparent cointelpro life .... check this, mr pedantic: "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, CIA Director (first staff meeting in 1981)

[JPLyokoWarrior]

@pt1gard As an intellectual, I have my honor which you are directly insulting by calling me a fool who believes the official story without question. I am no one's puppet. I've looked in-depth at the official story, I've looked at every conspiracy theory, I've even checked out the 'alien' photos from the Moon. I've just never found anything to suggest that what NASA said happened didn't happen.

As for your quote from Casey, you do realize that was from a director of the Cold War CIA, right?

[LunarTuner]

Why would he be "yanked forward"? If he's on wires, wouldn't he be yanked upward? You know, it's comical how many Apollo doubters seek to discredit Apollo with their own subjective sense of what they THINK they see--as if they know definitively what 1/6th earth's gravity is like.

So, it's my perception against yours. This is a guy in a stiff, pressurized suit getting up in low G.

The "wire flashes" are simply his comm antenna, seen 100s of times on Apollo EVA vids.

[piopa0hino0blackbone]

look the dust.

[piopa0hino0blackbone]

look the dust.

[kernzyp]

at 47 seconds, you can see his weight being taken ... he gets lifted from his knees upwards

[pt1gard]

@kernzyp ... its all a mockery of a hoax, my friend, no man ever near the moon

[parit1211]

okay,he just pulled off a David Copperfield lol

[ptownpresident]

NASA is a sick joke they should be ashamed.



[tiaxanderson]

The massive PLSS and OPS made him lost his balance and he pushes himself up. Also, as you may have noticed (especially around youtube), cursing is hardly something to be surprised at. And if you think that's a valid argument for a world wide conspiracy, sorry but please. Stop and roll over, in case you are on fire, as you are obviously incapable of noticing anything significant.

[hahaureadmyname]

Hmmm

When he says "Damn it" you can tell he is having a difficult time.

Why would the fishermen yank someone, and how can a wire thin enough not to be seen on camera hold around 200 pounds of weight?

I swear to god, if you can give me good reasons, I will beleive you, most of the other stuff involves wires as well.

[pt1gard]

@hahaureadmyname if you really want to look inot this, email me, otherwise you dont ... my email is this SN at aol .... i can show you tons of things that rpove we didnt go and am willing to share w.o name calling etc, you on the other hand have to spend some time with an open mind

[cadu1995]

@pt1gard You can see the wire flashes at :54 quite clearly.

What were you talking about when u said Hoses?

You have some good films.Where did u look at all these nasa films?thanks

[pt1gard]

@cadu1995 ... good find on the wires, i will add it to comments ... here's the hoses title to enter, it happens ay 54 seconds ....

"Astronauts See Stagehands in The Ceiling Holding Hoses(Wires) "

[pt1gard]

@cadu1995 .... google this for the vids ....

"apollo video library"

if you want to email or PM I will fwd you some good radio interviews on the scam too

[cadu1995]

@pt1gard Thanks alot.

[cadu1995]

@pt1gard If u look at :06 & :08 lol there are more wire flashes just above the astro-not that are not his antenna-too thin. And funny how nasa covers the antenna up also in alot of the "moon" shots. Like they r doing a magic trick-presto change-o LOL

Now you see them--now you don't.

[cadu1995]

@pt1gard watch?v=2eza11PBJOc

I see the hoses comment now at :54 How are these Astro-nots talking about GUYS on top of the LEM with the hoses?WHILE ON THE MOON??And the other guy answers-i just saw 1 of them a minute ago? That's a definite bust of nasa FAKERY.

I just don't get it- It was clear as day also.Moon Mission=BUSTED

[pt1gard]

@cadu1995 ... ever noticed how they digitally or using a smog type smear they de-pixelate many pics.... why is this??? to cover the wires IMHO

[Jamietheboi91]

@ 0:47 you can clearly see he slides backwards slightly just after he falls it just looks stupid and fake and so obivious!

[pt1gard]

@Jamietheboi91 the whole nasa apollo thing is hysterical, anyone with an open mind looking into it for 5 hours would realize complete hoax--only defenders are paid shills and idiots who think fighting in the middle east is brilliant

[greenmagoos]

fantastic again.sorry I missed these before

[JayCourt16]

oh ya definitely pissed at someone other than himself.. and you can clearly see he is pulled slightly up as he is pulled forward and take multiple small steps in an effort to avoid being pulled down

[JayCourt16]

you can see light reflecting on the "lunar" surface as he is yanked back and forth. probably the stage lights reflecting off of the crane holding him up

[pt1gard]

JAY,

lemme ask you this, when the naut curses, is that not the sound of someone who is pissed at someone else? ... is he not cursing himself? im sorry, its an obvious human observation that shouts that fact ... he is venting at his puppeteer!

[SuperHHHfan1]

yeah, they all used wires, cause nobody went to the moon. couldnt do it then, couldnt do it today. the nauts would be cooked long before they got there. by the last mission, they figured they got away with it, and their production was sloppy, like showing exposed skin on the moon and such. they really think people are stupid enough to think that we could do something half a century ago that we cant do now. so, technology, they would have us believe, has went downhill since then?

[pt1gard]

great post, super.... loved it :)

[AfroSchmuck]

@SuperHHHfan1 To concur with what you've said, last year NASA announced a plan to land on the moon "again" but get this, they are going to use ROBOTS LMFAO! The European Space Agencys much more detailed Aurora plan calls for a human landing on Mars in 2033 HEELLLL NOOO! NASA never gives a target date about maned moonlandings... Last rumor was a target date of 2047 WTFLOL? WHAT DAAA FUCK!? "NASA worked with 13 of the world's space agencies to develop a Global Exploration Strategy." Sabotage?

[elevenby2]

@SuperHHHfan1 NEW PICTURES ARE COMMING FROM THE JAPANESE MISSION AND THOSE ARE PROOVING THE APOLLO MISSIONS WERE NOT A FAKE.

[pt1gard]

@elevenby2 ... like the chinese water bubbles lmfao???

[rpsmith014]

@SuperHHHfan1 dumb ass

[knelsond]

look at the mars rovers of today and how slow and calculated every move is,... and these guys were bombing around on the moon in a dune buggy in the 60's!

[Manelvagorio]

AGAIN, clear evidence of the difficulties working in a spacesuit stiffened by relative pressurization. Has to drop himself 0:44 to get enough bend in the suit and didn't rock back far enough when getting up.

But hoaxtards like pt1gard and un4g1v3n1 want fools to think hes just a little fishy on a flyrod as the fisherman jerks him back and forth.

So if its all just a carefully crafted NASA film - why don't they just shoot this scene over again to prevent it from becoming fucktard fodder?

[pt1gard]

haw many names do you have on YT, how much money does langley pay U.... you are ultimate troll ... prpve that nasa went to moon ... do some research you bore me :)

[pt1gard]

shoot it again? they never counted on Utube, doofus ... hey would you like to come on the radio and debate jarrah or rick? lemme know, ill set it up :)

[pt1gard]

get serious, shill, the naut is yanked and this proves the hoax, why is he pissed? lmao

[pt1gard]

@Manelvagorio they never counted on the Net and people who figured their trix out 40 years later when these films became available--i never saw these as a kid in the 60s, did you? keep shilling :)

[ricardas83]

Naut leaned forward too much, so the weight of backpack puched him down and he felt, after that he floundered with hes legs and got up. Very simple.

[pt1gard]

poor ric, you are so brainwashed, how old are you ... you must really want to believe the nauts walked on the moon ... do you believe in God too?

[ricardas83]

I am 26 and I am atheist.

Do I want to believe that USA landed on the moon? Truth is more important to me. I see no reason to see that it was faked. And now I just explained you why he felt down and how he got up, but you are looking for more complex explanation.

[BjornPalmen]

@ricardas83 The simple truth is that the moon walks are not fake but genuine.

pt1gard comes up with the most unlikely explanations, and he never explains how an astronaut can be hanging in a "wire" and then be yanked HORISONTALLY by this same "wire". That is obviously WRONG.

His desperate insults show that he doesn't believe his fairy wire tale even himself anymore.

[jwcgrant]

What does God have to do with The Moon Landing??? You're saying one can't believe in God and also think the Moon Landing was faked?...that's ignorant.

[pt1gard]

myth minds are none thinking and ignorant

[un4g1v3n1]

"yes i see the wires

they used the same wires for chutes

strong "

Moron!

[un4g1v3nl]

yes i see the wires

they used the same wires for chutes

strong

[EGMAG]

Right at 0:45 moonman is on knees and has no reason to clumsily fall forward and jexcept for a jerky wireman who jerked him too soon.

[EGMAG]

pt1gard toad wires antenna<<

Thanks! I am trying to remember the film with that familiar type of toad! Was it Disney's old Alice in Wonderland or in a theme park? I know! Just Google Toad- ribbit! Yes, reflecting antenna flashes and intentional film graining does a fine distortion!

[northerntruthseeker]

As in all of the videos from Project Apollo, as you watch the so called Astro-NOT rise after falling over, you see an unnatural yanking of his body back to an upward position, especially without him pushing himself up and bending upward as you should expect... It obviously appears that the wires holding him up help to yank him up to attention...

Face it Apollogists... These clowns never went to the moon!

[pt1gard]

NTS,

comical how these guys are so strong, theyd be perfect for cirque du soleil gymnasts ... they can often levitate w/o making contact with the ground.

I'm sure the gov. got cocky after duping the public so long on this Moon nonsense and gave them confidence to pull off 9/11 and every other murdering ruse they have contrived thru the years.

[pt1gard]

to me anyhow, any sane person on earth could see that fraud if the watched from 40-55 secs that we never left earth's orbit, period.

[AfroSchmuck]

@northerntruthseeker NASA which means Satan, appropiately named their Moon mission Apollo after the Greek god. And how how many where their 6 of course!

[pt1gard]

@AfroSchmuck hey my man, try going to oraclebroddcasting, then go into Herzog's archives, got to june 2009, he has 2 hours with Jarrah and rick, great show ... thanks for commenting

[EGMAG]

I see a toad rock formation and wires.

[pt1gard]

you are right, egmag, Disney did love their dog formations, the toad was a good pickup by you! wires are seen in tons of vids and i have to laff when loyalists say they are solar relfectiions or antenna. now help me if im wrong but if they were antenna, do these antenna go up and down every 2 secs bc we rarely see a stationary antenna ... my guess nasa tossed them in as cover after they saw the wire reflection probs ... its just all absurd. the running dialogues are some of my fave.

[EGMAG]

pt1gard the TOAD was a good pickup by you!<< TOAD rock formation on MOON

PART 1 Condensed word for word except {comments}

The Adventures of Mr. Toad! Book and Disney Movie!

Toad's Wild Ride WAS a dark ride at Disneyland Park. Mr. Toad's journeys to NOWHERE in particular were operational on the park's opening day in 1955.{Is NOWHERE the Moonstage}? See PT 2

[EGMAG]

PART 2 I see a TOAD rock formation on MOON

Toad believes in fun, adventure & travelling to "NOWHERE IN PARTICULAR"; He has built a great deal of debt {NASA debts} from disregarding the financial responsibilities of his insatiable love for transportation vehicles, carts & (subsequently) the newfangled motor car. {new fangled MOONROVER}? See PT 3

[EGMAG]

PART 3 Condensed Word for word except {comments} fromthe Adventures of Mr. Toad!

I see a TOAD rock formation on MOON

Toad believes in fun, adventure & travelling to "NOWHERE IN PARTICULAR"; He has built a great deal of debt {NASA debts} from disregarding the financial responsibilities of his insatiable love for transportation vehicles, carts & (subsequently) the newfangled motor car. {new fangled MOONROVER}? See PT 4

[EGMAG]

PART 4 See PT 1 2 & 3

His mania leads to the loss of the deed to Toad Hall {White House}?

Toad redeems his good name by recovering the deed to the estate from the very hands of its captors! {Republicans?} {Is Toad JFK}?

Toad,promises to reform; but is shown

relapsing by recklessly flying a 1908 biplane

at the end of the story. {JFK sexual escapades}?