Great video!! Evolution in my opinion is one of the most beautiful things to learn about, well, that and the cosmos... So what I'm trying to say is, go naturalism!! :)
@BlackRaptor31 Im an evolutionist, but you should respect other people's beliefs, and try to be a little more open-minded. Science has been changed many times over history, so what we think is never completely, beyond doubt, correct.
You can believe whatever you like: evolution or religious , I will respect you just as much. No one can shove their views down your throat, and certainly regard it publicly as stupid x
Amazingly good illustration of the tree of life, many people who try to smear evolution usually shows pictures of darwins first illustration that's like a handmade doodle.
Very good imagination ! it will take time for us to understand the origin of everything.especially life. thats hard stuff. no man so far has the knowledge to explain clearly and convincingly the mysterry of everything. for the time being, lets listen. its a good try though. i say, millions of intelligent people did like this guy, spent their whole life researching but failed. they all die not knowing. so we, not so intelligent.
If you like documentaries like me, I recommend Clash of the Dinosaurs. Mind-blowing, it shows that we have a prejudiced image of dinos by thinking they weren't evolved enough to survive. In fact, they were superevolved when it came to sensory development and reigned for millions of years as you may know. It took something extraterrestrial (meteor) to take 'em down (twice).
Reading throught the comments It Stuns me just How Ignorant some people really are LIKE WOW RELIGIOUS CREOTARDS ARE SUCH FUCKING RETARDED MORONS Who would rather beleive "god did it" Than do the hard work and get an EDUCATION. FFS GET OUT of your 2000 year old fairy tale books and read Go to school LEARN SOMETHING ANYTHING.
@jhonsebastiantv evidence points towards god being man made in the first place, so there is no god anyway.............if there was, we would know it without superstition
It's sort of "Evolution's Greatest Hits" rather than a comprehensive telling, but I like this video. I'd liken it to a less charming version of the similar sequence in Cosmos only with better graphics.
Wow this sounds like bullshit... Animals dont just come out of know where, bugs to dinosaurs came from the same cells? No way this theory is way to simple. NOBODY knows how life was formed.
3 thousand million yrs ago? Who was the 8th president of the U.S.? Who hit the 1st home run in baseball? What was the 1st words spoken by George Washington? If man can't answer these questions w/out recorded documents then how can man tell what happened 3 thousand million yrs ago? w/out recorded documents? This video is nothing more then a good makings of a hollywood movie. NO evidence of 3 thousand million yrs ago. This is why it's called, THEORY. Happy birthday or whatever 2 The Bird Watcher
@MrBillH60: 'Some people are so stupid, they don't know how stupid they are'. You're using the word theory in the wrong context. 1. A theory in technical use is a more or less verified or established explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena: the theory of relativity. 2. (Theory as in) hypothesis are used in non-technical contexts to mean an untested idea or opinion. There is insurmountable evidence that does not contradict evolution whilst in time-scale supports the theory 100%.
The one thing that TofE wants to do is redefine things. Redefine the world to fit their theory. Theory; man evolves. Problem; not enough time. Solution; Add more time. You can't change reality to fit your thoughts. You have to change your thoughts to fit reality.
*There is insurmountable evidence * When you make it up of course. U'er not go'n 2 make up something that's going 2 contradict your thoughts. That's childs play.
@MrBillH60: Ah, an eyeballs-only guy. But there's a difference between a story that is pulled from the air and one for which many lines of physical evidence can be agreed upon. That's the difference between a fable and a theory. True, there is no evidence shown here, this is a summary; Attenborough assumes the evidence he has presented in 100s of hours of his own filmed experiences, corroborated by millions of hours of others work condensed into hundreds of thousands of scientific papers.
C) DNA is not a language.. Like a book is written in a language, but itself isn't one.
The molecules are the letters, the possible combinations the syntax, but we just start to get a glimps of what the semantics of DNA are and are far away from writing our own poesie in DNA-strains...
if there is a real god, it,s sir david. watching him and listening to him gives me goose bumps. legend. who could really say creation is true, when we have minds like sir david,s to tell us the truth.
So it took almost 2.5k millions year of evolution bfore something "big" happend. I think most people forget that. Lots of time for mother nature to try everything out a couple of million times : )
The only remaining question is how populated the Milky Way Galaxy is with life. What is the percentage for life to arise? Intelligence rolls uphill on the evolutionary chain so I anticipate self awareness and civilization being the eventual outcome of Life given enough time,space, resources.
How much It would have meant to me to be able to be alive during the first official public discovery of Intelligent Life off Earth. Hopefully a superior Intelligence that will go with us to the Stars.
You are correct. I did imply that intelligence is the final outcome of evolution but you are correct that it is not a necessity. It sure is one hell of a fucking evolutionary advantage trait though.
No longer is size a factor, or strength, or speed. Just strategy.
Sir David Attenborough! He could narrate my way through space.
ok..
I understand, I think, what God means. I understand that once you've glimpsed heaven, there is no other thing to fight for. The principles in the bible are like a way to talk to people. Sure it's been convoluted, distorted and made of heavy metaphor, and many a contradiction.. but its message is too simple for words. We're suppose to carry each other, but instead we are fighting for survival, in every facet of our being.
If we were clean in our minds.. we'd be flying by now. I know transhumanism is super duper on the horizon, so flying isn't that far off.. but it will happen along the same vein as all other progressive movements. By competition. 'i'm better than you.' when really, ain't no one person better than anyone else. all that's required to make something happen is time. But our systems define, and cut time into pieces. izbooshit.
Deception and hidden motives(even the ones we are unaware of) deteriorate the fabric of life. Peaks and valleys in karma, I don't think works. But then, I am only just starting to understand bits and pieces of my surroundings, so I can't be sure.
Anyway, I support all theories.. whatever makes you an honest and peaceful person, is good.
(something that comes to me now, as well, is that the Bible is like life. It is full of everything we hate.. but also everything we love. it's finding the good parts so that we can help it grow. we can be it's water.
check out the history of Darwin himself and he was a christain so dont come at me with non logistical theories. Ask the US government to proof their claim for WOMD.
Ask yourself, who created Darwin. Science is been used by the demons to defect people from GOD and its all part of the great luciferian deception.
Ask your grandparents if they have ever heard of a monkey turning into human beings? But science and evolutions claims we came from monkeys. check out Roger Morneau's interview
Evolution does NOT claim we came from modern monkeys. It claims that we share a common ancestry. The fossil record and genetics have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that we ARE apes. We are so closely related the gorillas that we can accept a blood transfusion from them. We share 99% of our DNA with chimps.
Sweetie, it's okay to believe in God, but don't let it make you stupid.
You guys are been fooled by these documentaries. Charles Darwin was chosen by Lucifer to deceive people of the existance of the bible. And the fools are making it stick.
Darwin was a christian before been approached by the devil.
1That does bring up the problems of human social behavior. Should social behaviors interact according to moral or according to superior human attributes, or both?
2 Can the truth about evolution include the unexplainable awareness of a causation beyond all powers that exists even before the universe itself?
3 Is there a reason why human consciousness decision making has evolved in human minds from hundreds of thousands of years to unravel infinity?
I think my "cognitive function gene" didn't express. Natural selection has yet to take over to stop me reproducing but it shouldn't be too long... Funny how humans "are created equal" yet everything we know about biology tells us otherwise.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ah,nonooo mister Bestof sciece,darwinisme that u're happy of has been invalid now infortunatly,darwinism now is seen as the Root of racism,n Darwin is the head of racism n all its results..
me personally i dnt accept that once i was monkey,but i accept that my father was Adam a human that God created n that it's God who created every thing,n all creatures;creatures r unable 2 develope them selves,if it was like darwin tells,i wanna develope sum legs to fly without plan,why i cannot do it :(
It's called Natural Selection. Cosmic radiation (and other forces) randomly alter DNA strings. Mutations occur over time, or abruptly. Those better fitted to their environments/tasks reproduce more. Over the course of millions of years all kinds of changes can happen. This is ongoing today.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
so u say indirectly nature created its self and it selects creatures and it makes changes on their DNA throw millions of years,(OMG why it doesnt select me now lol am really upset ) just think logically , can all this exact organisation of the world be just a random , unbeleivable,if u just make a look on any system in ur body or just a living cell , u'll find that its impossible to be just a random,,, think a little abt this ...then tell me does this nature have a mind it thinks with!!!be logic
Your assertion is wronger then wrong. The lesson of evolutionary biology is that diversity is strength and the 'goal' of the evolutionary process. I have, however, read a book that is filled with talk of a 'chosen race' and bloody genocides, not Origin of Species but the 'holy' Bible. I am so glad to know that I am part of the great Brotherhood of Life and not a defective lump of animated mud.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You know, every time I hear about evolution, and the different things people add to my knowledge, the more I just think Charles Darwin was on something bad when he wrote about evolution. There is no human way that bones could randomly grow over "billions and billions" of years. So many reasons why I just have to trace back to God creating the world, that is the one fact I will believe.
Have you ever heard of people who have 6 toes? They HAVE more bones than the regular human being, how did they grow? oh yes, it's called MUTATION, not so impossible now, right? just an alteration of the DNA, now of course having 6 toes is not a fundamental for survival but some mutations are, and those are the ones that are passed for the next generation, if you stack many many mutations over the period of millions of years you start getting new species, you get it now?
well said biomanwin! and smith13457 cant find a peer reviewed artical cause their are NONE, 100% fact. it should be called the law of evolution but that will never happen because of ignorant brainwashed closed minded people like smith and his "many scientists" FOOL you got that right
You are an ignorant sack of biblical bullshit. Either that or you are deliberately lying, which is worse. Either way evolution is supported by mounds of evidence, morphology, geology, genetics, palentology, anthropology, chemistry, paleobiology, biochemistry, cellular biology, microbiology, and zoology. Just to name a few. If you think you are smarter than all the doctorate holding scientists in these disciplines nominate yourself for a nobel prize you ignorant fool.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I dont think im smarter than any doctorate holding scientists.But i know God is,and i believe his word.Their are many scientists who dont believe in evolution,and its not suprising why.
Everytime someone disagrees with you guys,its always the same,abusive responses.
Thinking a person is an ignorant fool,because he believes this universe in all its complexity requires a creator,is foolish.
I was brought up Catholic, so i know full well about jesus and have concluded that religion is an imaginary friend for adults. Also your point about Sir Isaac Newton is completely irrelivant as he died BEFORE Darwin published the Origin of Species, so how could he possibly have agreed with it. Name one respectable scientist who disagrees with the evidence from all the scientific disciplines I mentioned. Or show me one peer reviewed paper supporting Intelligent Design. Your Call.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You were brought up a catholic biomanwin,but you see one must be bornagain by the spirit of God.John3:3
Answers in genesis has a list on their website,700 names of young earth creation scientists.But thats irrelivant,in the past the mojority has often been wrong.There are no scientists who disagree with any scientific disciplines,the point your missing is Evolution=the atheistic religion,Genetic mutations do not cause an increase of information in the genome needed for macroe evolution.
I am going to ask a very serious question, how can a theory, with mounds of evidence at that, decieve me? A theory is not an entity, just an explanation for the evidence we see around us. Therefore a theory cannot decieve anyone, new evidence can just change theories.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
We have the same evidence whether creationist or evolutionist.I believe the evidence supports creation,you obviously disagree.Its not going to be settled by me or you.
Jeremiah 33:3 Call to me,and i will answer you,and show you great and mighty things,which you do not know.
Thats a promise from God,to us all.
People dont understand they can approach God for themselves.
I dont have all truth,or claim to.
God does,call unto him,its his promise that he will answer not mine.
Are you serious? The GREAT majority of the scientific community consider evolution as a FACT, they may disagree on wether or not natural selection is the only factor for the diversity of life, but evolution has mounds of evidence from way to many fields of science and has actually been seen on the laboratory, search for e.coli evolution, even the most religious scientist can't deny evolution, stop spreading bullshit like the false idea that there's a split concensus.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
My alternative is God created all life.
My belief is faith based,as is evolution,but they wont admit it.However there is evidence to support creation,Irreducible complexity being one example,please research.
The article i read about the tree of life,was in the january 21st edition of new scientist,why darwin was wrong about the tree of life.
well, I have many questions, but there is one. How do you explain the many skeletons and fossils of humanoids in diffrent stages of evolution that were found? If there wasn't any evolution how did they get there? God put them there to test our faith? I mean, c'mon....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You responded immediately,so obviously you never read the article or researched about irreducible complexity.You gave me no answer,the replied with a question.There aren,t any transitional fossils,the few they present are highly debatible,this is why evolutionists such as steven gould are now admitting,the itermediates dont exist,are are inventing new theores such as punctuated equilibria.
ok, I'm gonna do the reasearch and by the way, I've been tryin' all my life to find proof that god exists, beacause that would make things much easier. I do have a perception of god, but I am not religious.
I'd love to. As every huamn being I am striving for absolute and infinity, and I think religion takes advantage of just that. So again, I don't think any religion has the answer as they are so human-like, nothing absolute about them. But that doesn't mean there is no god, regardless of how you perceive it.
The New Scientist article you refer to basically says that Darwin was wrong because they've discovered that it's not a "Tree of Life" but more a "Web of Life".
The article does nothing to say that evolution doesn't occur. In fact, it just means that evolution is more complex then Darwin originally envisioned.
You know nothing about what you're saying, sorry but to be blunt you're extremely ignorant if you think we don't have transitional fossils.
"As we celebrate the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth, we await a third revolution that will see biology changed and strengthened.
None of this should give succour to creationists, whose blinkered universe is doubtless already buzzing with the news that 'New Scientist has announced Darwin was wrong'".
That's because they are bogus. Creationism is simply trying to fit in anywhere it can. It's quite conveinent when you have a bogus idea that's not founded on logic. You can always wait for new evidence to come out and then say, "well, god created man that way then...."
capitalcontested, so are written reports taken as evidence as well, courts do it all the time, and some of those judges are atheist. Archeology also goes on material evidence & supports some of the biblical history. So like i said again. Everything just ' is ' or ' exists ', the rest is human perception. Both atheism & theism are psycholical conditions as well as emotional conditions ( professor Paul.C.Vitz....the professor is qualified to say so).
And Gigantism, average(s) & Dwarfism's. Robert Wadlow, Sandy & others. The real life thumbelina, also tribes with pigmies ( all homo sapiens ) that is a sceintific evidence to refute Darwin's Belief's & those that joined the atheist band in the ' evolution ' with searching for a bigger skull for a bigger brain in the transition, sorry that's a belief still. Also humans have come with 5 fingers & 1 thumb ( total: 6) and also 6 toes, there are many cases today of this.
Paul C. Vitz may be qualified to give his opinion, but that's about it. He's a "christian" psychologist. So, not surprisingly, he's one of those few academics that theist can camp around, but who has no real weight in the academic world. Atheism is simply the condition of being without postualating any supernatural beliefs. I'm an anti-theist, because I think that theist have a very, very weak argument(s). So, take your pseudo-psychologist to church with you, cuz I don't buy it.
I invite you to explain how a group of chemicals simply up and began to display signs of life, acting on their own, and creating replicateable cells. Technically, shouldn't we then be able to do the same with technology? Create life from materials without using existing forms of life?
Only when you can accomplish that will Creationism be a void argument.
The burden of proof is on you, for stating that there is a god. Science can demonstratably proof now, more than enough to disprove any holy book. Just because your cults give you weak answers, doesn't mean that they are in any way correct. So, christian creationism is just as weak of an argument as if I were to argue that man was made by the earth rotating around the sun, just the right amount of times, until we hatched out of the trees.... actually, that's a better argument than creationism.
capitolcontested, you are welcome to your belief, Paul C Vitz was also an atheist & took his study on this as an atheist, so whilst he was an atheist he came to the conclusion that i told you about, it was then from this conclusion that he became christian. But it is correct affirmation in Psychology, as psychologists cross-reference these subjects.
As for the rest i do not understand your perception & not about to do an analysis about you. Enjoy the video & wish you all the best.
The field of psychology is a science, but his beliefs aren't part of the academic priciples of psychology. They are part of his personally published work. I'm not going to read in any academic guide of psychology that his beliefs on theism and atheism are taken to be what modern psychologist think. It's to subjective, and he can't back it up with research. I also see on your page that you're a fan of the 'Obama deception', so I won't burden you with the idea of proof. I also wish you well.
The fact is a do reason & by my comments about Darwin's origin of species about evolutionists searching for a bigger skull for such a link is silly, when we have had a lot of cases in ' i repeat ' gigantism ( Robert Wadlow) and Dwarfism's ( the real life thumbelina) and such little people as pigmies. Also people with 6 toes & 6 fingers etc. That is by reason & also Proof.
Nobody said that I was in a cult receiving weak answers. I also never said I was a christian. I am simply stating that the idea that an entity external to ourselves may have been responsible for instilling life in what would otherwise be a ball of matter. The "proof" is not found in science, which you failed to acknowledge, making you ignorant. But the proof is also not explained by religion.
In this way, both theories must be taken as equal.
Your problem is that you are taking other people's assumptions, and making your own assumptions, which you claim to be correct. I am in no way saying that either belief is right or wrong, I am simply saying that you cannot be truly knowledgeable on this subject without recognizing both scenarios.
I'm not completley discrediting creationism. I'm saying science backs up the answers that it does give, and it activily seeks to discover more. It's not a 50/50 issue. The argument for creationims, while an argument, is very weak. It does not have a strong foundation. yes, it's an argument, but I don't think it's a good argument.
Alright, but you should also look into creationism a bit more. You might be surprised at the number of scientific (Not church funded) papers that support that belief. I'm really 50/50 on the issue, though.
I've seen much of the science that backs it. But, they usually back it on a hypothetical scenario not involving a grand creator. I've never heard of any argument that could hope to make it a 50/50 scenario. Yes, they provide two possible answers, that does not mean that they have an equall propability of being true. People can believe in what they wish, but if they want to argue that their belief is right, then they need to support the case. That's why evolution pushed creationism the side.
I've done research. I'm in school for biology, thank you. You might want to be the one to do more research, and I'm not just talking about searching the internet.
what is it then? it is a theory for your information, since it cannot be proven nor disproven. I personally believe in a form of creationism, but I recognize that it is not simply a belief.
Are you serious? Do we have to have this debate? Just look at the rest of the comments, man. You'll see that not only am I an idiot, but you'll look more like one the further you read.
I'd say your comments make more sense to me, than this Darwin ' evolution ' theory of searching for a bigger skull to house a bigger brain as a ' missing link ' with the all shapes & sizes we have from Gigantism to Dwarfism's in people, plus the toes & fingers that come in sixes with some ( Anne Bolyen being a famous case), but there are people with all 6's on all parts, both hands and both feet.
They CAN be disproven, but that does not automatically make them false. Also, that has nothing to do with your initial comment. And it is simply an obvious statement.
Also, the proper internet meme would be "lern 2 science"
Theories are frameworks of ideas which explain facts and make testable predictions. If facts are uncovered that clash with the theory, then the theory is re-formulated.
Creationism is belief in an ancient storybook. It has no predictive power and the only explanatory power it has is GODDIDIT. Only facts that agree with creationism are aknowledged.
creationism is religion with a modern twist to try and get back into our society since religion and state should be separate... in the world of science it would be called a hypothesis and untested and unproven idea.. not a scientific theory which has to be tested and proven
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't believe in evolution or creationism, i think they are as bad as each other. We just ' are '. As the scientists involved with evolution were searching for the ' missing link ' in the string of man witha ' bigger brain ' they figured, the fact is homo sapiens come in all shpes and sizes, gigantism, average & dwarfism. Creationists explaination is just ' silly '. Creationism & evolution are as bad as each other & those who contend either one against the other. We will never know exactly.
I totally agree with you. And also I don't believe the earth is either flat or spherical. In the end the two different opinions are probably just the result of an optical illusion, so both sides are just as bad and should accept that we'll never know anything and everyone who tries to understand anything is just wasting their time.
hennybonny, i couldn't agree more with you at all. it boils down to both sides having a human perspective & imagination ( theory) with it. None of us in the present will ever be able to make a claim as a ' first-hand witness', i didn't even exist when my great-grandmother was alive & kicking!
Still, humans need the release every now & then from ' reality ' & the present.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What a lovely "Disney style" fairy tale. "In a land long ago and far away...." Darwin wasn't a scientist and this video is pseudo- science. This video leaves thousands of questions unanswered with all of it's baseless, unscientific assumptions. Historians disagree about events that happened hundreds of years ago yet some claim to know what took place BILLIONS of years ago? I'm not buying this garbage.
99.8% of scientists would disagree with you.. four times more scientists believe the holocaust didn't happen than refute evolution.. youtube carl sagan's COSMOS on evolution. great series even for dimwits.. I would also bet you believe in a few fairy tales yourself sir
History is a subjective area of study. Science is not. If you act on an atom the same way under the same conditions, that atom will always do the same thing. Besides, one doesn't need to look back billions of years; evolution has been unmistakably observed. As for its being a Disney-style fairy tale, how so? Countless species suffered and went extinct over billions of years of evolution. The species we see today don't comprise the tiniest fraction of all the species that have ever lived.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
History is a collection of FACTS about past events. Science is not subjective but this video is VERY subjective since the information is pure fantasy and has never been observed in any laboratory. The variations among species that are observed today have definite LIMITATIONS. The video presents variation without limitations which is not observable and repeatable science.
"Science is not subjective but this video is VERY subjective since the information is pure fantasy and has never been observed in any laboratory"
Don't be an idiot. Science isn't limited to merely what can be observed in a laboratory. If it were, we never would have developed atomic theory, let alone the resources and technology required to take us to the moon. Your ignorance of the scientific process doesn't qualify you to wax philosophical about the failings of evolutionary theory.
Much of what we know about certain historical epochs has been derived from finding scraps of documents here and stone tablets there and ruined buildings elsewhere, that historians have to make sense of as a whole to figure out how everything came to pass - not nearly as cut and dry as you seem to suggest. The remains of prehistoric creatures count as the "facts" in the sense that you use the word, which have to be understood as a whole to figure out how everything came to pass biologically.
hm...just thought of something...Are there any airborne creatures that are not classified as birds? I can only think of flying squirrels, but they're more gliding than flying.
Of course I completely forgot about insects...d'oh. :)
Could Sir David Attenborough be a combined incarnation of Captain Kirk and Carl Sagan? Gotta love his voice mannerisms.
tastybrain 1 year ago
Great video!! Evolution in my opinion is one of the most beautiful things to learn about, well, that and the cosmos... So what I'm trying to say is, go naturalism!! :)
cycodevilboy 1 year ago
@BlackRaptor31 Im an evolutionist, but you should respect other people's beliefs, and try to be a little more open-minded. Science has been changed many times over history, so what we think is never completely, beyond doubt, correct.
ShatteredxSpiritx 1 year ago
You can believe whatever you like: evolution or religious , I will respect you just as much. No one can shove their views down your throat, and certainly regard it publicly as stupid x
ShatteredxSpiritx 1 year ago
Amazingly good illustration of the tree of life, many people who try to smear evolution usually shows pictures of darwins first illustration that's like a handmade doodle.
horbergaren 1 year ago
Very good imagination ! it will take time for us to understand the origin of everything.especially life. thats hard stuff. no man so far has the knowledge to explain clearly and convincingly the mysterry of everything. for the time being, lets listen. its a good try though. i say, millions of intelligent people did like this guy, spent their whole life researching but failed. they all die not knowing. so we, not so intelligent.
luzvizmind 1 year ago
If you like documentaries like me, I recommend Clash of the Dinosaurs. Mind-blowing, it shows that we have a prejudiced image of dinos by thinking they weren't evolved enough to survive. In fact, they were superevolved when it came to sensory development and reigned for millions of years as you may know. It took something extraterrestrial (meteor) to take 'em down (twice).
Voydr 1 year ago
Reading throught the comments It Stuns me just How Ignorant some people really are LIKE WOW RELIGIOUS CREOTARDS ARE SUCH FUCKING RETARDED MORONS Who would rather beleive "god did it" Than do the hard work and get an EDUCATION. FFS GET OUT of your 2000 year old fairy tale books and read Go to school LEARN SOMETHING ANYTHING.
vince38curious2 1 year ago
Awesome!
libville 1 year ago
I am not sure what to believe but i have one question. If god made everything, us etc etc then who made him?
jhonsebastiantv 1 year ago
@jhonsebastiantv evidence points towards god being man made in the first place, so there is no god anyway.............if there was, we would know it without superstition
NaturalSelection101 1 year ago
@jhonsebastiantv
probably another god, lol
WoodstockRogue666 1 year ago
@WoodstockRogue666 then who made that another god? Another god? LOL haha XD
jhonsebastiantv 1 year ago
@jhonsebastiantv
Sure !!
It's obvious :-) .
WoodstockRogue666 1 year ago
It's sort of "Evolution's Greatest Hits" rather than a comprehensive telling, but I like this video. I'd liken it to a less charming version of the similar sequence in Cosmos only with better graphics.
Cool stuff.
DrThunder88 1 year ago
His presentation is a little spasdic, but I'm listening.
campbpar 1 year ago
Read Vedas to know the real answers. Can go hand in hand what the guy is saying.
bhuvannn 1 year ago
Can I see a show of hands from the folks who believe the earth is 6000 years old and was created in 6 days please?
libville 1 year ago
@libville I world was created 43 years ago just for me ;-)
NaturalSelection101 1 year ago
Go Dave!!!
libville 1 year ago
@Mr88playmaker: A & B, OK. C is obfuscation. Neither term is defined or contexted, so equating them has no meaning.
puncheex 1 year ago
@suppaman12: Yeah, he does, but not all people think that's correct, so why shouldn't he be very explicit about what number he really means?
puncheex 1 year ago
Wow this sounds like bullshit... Animals dont just come out of know where, bugs to dinosaurs came from the same cells? No way this theory is way to simple. NOBODY knows how life was formed.
420Sheffield420 1 year ago
@420Sheffield420 did you know owls evolved from pigs, on a farm on bramall lane.
userwl2850 1 year ago
@userwl2850 did you know you sound real fuckin stupid?
420Sheffield420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@420Sheffield420 let me guess,,,,,,,,,,,, you,re a piggy blade?
userwl2850 1 year ago
3 thousand million yrs ago? Who was the 8th president of the U.S.? Who hit the 1st home run in baseball? What was the 1st words spoken by George Washington? If man can't answer these questions w/out recorded documents then how can man tell what happened 3 thousand million yrs ago? w/out recorded documents? This video is nothing more then a good makings of a hollywood movie. NO evidence of 3 thousand million yrs ago. This is why it's called, THEORY. Happy birthday or whatever 2 The Bird Watcher
MrBillH60 1 year ago
@MrBillH60: 'Some people are so stupid, they don't know how stupid they are'. You're using the word theory in the wrong context. 1. A theory in technical use is a more or less verified or established explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena: the theory of relativity. 2. (Theory as in) hypothesis are used in non-technical contexts to mean an untested idea or opinion. There is insurmountable evidence that does not contradict evolution whilst in time-scale supports the theory 100%.
TheStrangeControl 1 year ago
@TheStrangeControl *You're using the word theory in the wrong context.*
The one thing that TofE wants to do is redefine things. Redefine the world to fit their theory. Theory; man evolves. Problem; not enough time. Solution; Add more time. You can't change reality to fit your thoughts. You have to change your thoughts to fit reality.
*There is insurmountable evidence * When you make it up of course. U'er not go'n 2 make up something that's going 2 contradict your thoughts. That's childs play.
MrBillH60 1 year ago
@MrBillH60: You will not listen to reason so it is pointless showing you how wrong you are.
TheStrangeControl 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheStrangeControl * You will not listen to reason so it is pointless showing you how wrong you are.*
Yeah but nice try anyway.
I'll give you an "A" for effort. How's that? You feel better?
There's some children in 1st grade that will listen to whatever you tell them. Maybe you should there?
A thinking man is the enemy of the Theory of Evolution. It's geared more towards the man that can't think for himself.
MrBillH60 1 year ago
@MrBillH60: Ah, an eyeballs-only guy. But there's a difference between a story that is pulled from the air and one for which many lines of physical evidence can be agreed upon. That's the difference between a fable and a theory. True, there is no evidence shown here, this is a summary; Attenborough assumes the evidence he has presented in 100s of hours of his own filmed experiences, corroborated by millions of hours of others work condensed into hundreds of thousands of scientific papers.
puncheex 1 year ago
LONG LIVE EVOLUTION!!!!!!
oldblubblub 1 year ago
Is it just me, or is the version of where we came from that's most likely to be true also the one that's the most beautiful?
Just thinking of this while walking through a park is enough to give me chills.
Cihl280777 1 year ago 3
once upon a time... lolz. easier said than done. it was quite entertaining animation though. ;)
ThickShades 1 year ago
David Attenborough is an absolute legend. When he finally shuffles off this mortal coil it will be a great loss to the world.
gpdl00355 1 year ago 4
just to make it really correct:
C) DNA is not a language.. Like a book is written in a language, but itself isn't one.
The molecules are the letters, the possible combinations the syntax, but we just start to get a glimps of what the semantics of DNA are and are far away from writing our own poesie in DNA-strains...
liquidminds 2 years ago
The stunning movie of the year. Watch it @ TINY(.)CC/M0VIEZ delete ->()
ohaabohaa 2 years ago
if there is a real god, it,s sir david. watching him and listening to him gives me goose bumps. legend. who could really say creation is true, when we have minds like sir david,s to tell us the truth.
userwl2850 2 years ago 4
This is a really nice vid.
TheDerekdub 2 years ago
So it took almost 2.5k millions year of evolution bfore something "big" happend. I think most people forget that. Lots of time for mother nature to try everything out a couple of million times : )
Excellent video.
daarco2 2 years ago
The only remaining question is how populated the Milky Way Galaxy is with life. What is the percentage for life to arise? Intelligence rolls uphill on the evolutionary chain so I anticipate self awareness and civilization being the eventual outcome of Life given enough time,space, resources.
How much It would have meant to me to be able to be alive during the first official public discovery of Intelligent Life off Earth. Hopefully a superior Intelligence that will go with us to the Stars.
turkeyburgers 2 years ago
Intelligence is a side-effect, not a goal in and of itself. Millions of species get by just fine without any semblance of intelligence.
LenxKat 2 years ago
You are correct. I did imply that intelligence is the final outcome of evolution but you are correct that it is not a necessity. It sure is one hell of a fucking evolutionary advantage trait though.
No longer is size a factor, or strength, or speed. Just strategy.
turkeyburgers 2 years ago
Sir David Attenborough! He could narrate my way through space.
ok..
I understand, I think, what God means. I understand that once you've glimpsed heaven, there is no other thing to fight for. The principles in the bible are like a way to talk to people. Sure it's been convoluted, distorted and made of heavy metaphor, and many a contradiction.. but its message is too simple for words. We're suppose to carry each other, but instead we are fighting for survival, in every facet of our being.
CPWICN 2 years ago
If we were clean in our minds.. we'd be flying by now. I know transhumanism is super duper on the horizon, so flying isn't that far off.. but it will happen along the same vein as all other progressive movements. By competition. 'i'm better than you.' when really, ain't no one person better than anyone else. all that's required to make something happen is time. But our systems define, and cut time into pieces. izbooshit.
CPWICN 2 years ago
Deception and hidden motives(even the ones we are unaware of) deteriorate the fabric of life. Peaks and valleys in karma, I don't think works. But then, I am only just starting to understand bits and pieces of my surroundings, so I can't be sure.
Anyway, I support all theories.. whatever makes you an honest and peaceful person, is good.
CPWICN 2 years ago
(something that comes to me now, as well, is that the Bible is like life. It is full of everything we hate.. but also everything we love. it's finding the good parts so that we can help it grow. we can be it's water.
I think we're suppose to fix the shape of things.
that sounds pretty good to me!
CPWICN 2 years ago
*its
CPWICN 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out the history of Darwin himself and he was a christain so dont come at me with non logistical theories. Ask the US government to proof their claim for WOMD.
Ask yourself, who created Darwin. Science is been used by the demons to defect people from GOD and its all part of the great luciferian deception.
Ask your grandparents if they have ever heard of a monkey turning into human beings? But science and evolutions claims we came from monkeys. check out Roger Morneau's interview
SpaceboogieMusic 2 years ago
haha do you know what a gene is? Have you heard of DNA?
Chibling 2 years ago 3
Evolution does NOT claim we came from modern monkeys. It claims that we share a common ancestry. The fossil record and genetics have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that we ARE apes. We are so closely related the gorillas that we can accept a blood transfusion from them. We share 99% of our DNA with chimps.
Sweetie, it's okay to believe in God, but don't let it make you stupid.
ciaochowbella 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
You guys are been fooled by these documentaries. Charles Darwin was chosen by Lucifer to deceive people of the existance of the bible. And the fools are making it stick.
Darwin was a christian before been approached by the devil.
SpaceboogieMusic 2 years ago
Interesting.
Can you prove your claim?
Stefnir94 2 years ago 2
Or are you being ironic?
Or a troll?
Stefnir94 2 years ago 4
I suppose he's either joking or insane.
mightyampersand 2 years ago
You believe in the Devil? I always thought the greatest evil was a closed mind.
chopin65 2 years ago
So you believe in talking snakes, speaking shrubbery, water from wine and other forms of magick? Are you an idiot?
So what if Darwin was a Christian? That doesn't mean his observations were incorrect or the work of the Devil.
ciaochowbella 2 years ago
Attenborough is anti-belt
Chibling 2 years ago
1That does bring up the problems of human social behavior. Should social behaviors interact according to moral or according to superior human attributes, or both?
2 Can the truth about evolution include the unexplainable awareness of a causation beyond all powers that exists even before the universe itself?
3 Is there a reason why human consciousness decision making has evolved in human minds from hundreds of thousands of years to unravel infinity?
EGMAG 2 years ago
I think my "cognitive function gene" didn't express. Natural selection has yet to take over to stop me reproducing but it shouldn't be too long... Funny how humans "are created equal" yet everything we know about biology tells us otherwise.
jimmy202500 2 years ago
Jimmy> But as you may well know, natural selection is not a magical man in the sky who descends to punish you personally.
If only stupidity WAS a fittness-reducing trait in modern society..
Cephalochordata 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ah,nonooo mister Bestof sciece,darwinisme that u're happy of has been invalid now infortunatly,darwinism now is seen as the Root of racism,n Darwin is the head of racism n all its results..
me personally i dnt accept that once i was monkey,but i accept that my father was Adam a human that God created n that it's God who created every thing,n all creatures;creatures r unable 2 develope them selves,if it was like darwin tells,i wanna develope sum legs to fly without plan,why i cannot do it :(
EyesOfPower10Y 2 years ago
It's called Natural Selection. Cosmic radiation (and other forces) randomly alter DNA strings. Mutations occur over time, or abruptly. Those better fitted to their environments/tasks reproduce more. Over the course of millions of years all kinds of changes can happen. This is ongoing today.
RaenD 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so u say indirectly nature created its self and it selects creatures and it makes changes on their DNA throw millions of years,(OMG why it doesnt select me now lol am really upset ) just think logically , can all this exact organisation of the world be just a random , unbeleivable,if u just make a look on any system in ur body or just a living cell , u'll find that its impossible to be just a random,,, think a little abt this ...then tell me does this nature have a mind it thinks with!!!be logic
EyesOfPower10Y 2 years ago
Your assertion is wronger then wrong. The lesson of evolutionary biology is that diversity is strength and the 'goal' of the evolutionary process. I have, however, read a book that is filled with talk of a 'chosen race' and bloody genocides, not Origin of Species but the 'holy' Bible. I am so glad to know that I am part of the great Brotherhood of Life and not a defective lump of animated mud.
TheNewRenaissance 2 years ago 4
Me talk like im five, me thinks darwin should have cut you outta the tree. Natrual selection should still be around in humans for this guy!
UpDog1000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have not herd more bullshit than this, the tree of life crap, aten is a fool
1MrSpider 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You know, every time I hear about evolution, and the different things people add to my knowledge, the more I just think Charles Darwin was on something bad when he wrote about evolution. There is no human way that bones could randomly grow over "billions and billions" of years. So many reasons why I just have to trace back to God creating the world, that is the one fact I will believe.
BoyOfLol 2 years ago
Have you ever heard of people who have 6 toes? They HAVE more bones than the regular human being, how did they grow? oh yes, it's called MUTATION, not so impossible now, right? just an alteration of the DNA, now of course having 6 toes is not a fundamental for survival but some mutations are, and those are the ones that are passed for the next generation, if you stack many many mutations over the period of millions of years you start getting new species, you get it now?
ArmandoXIII 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Happy is he that hath the God of Jacob for his help, whose hope is in the LORD his God:
Which made heaven, and earth, the sea, and all that therein is: which keepeth truth for ever!
Psalm 146: 5-6
indyeight 2 years ago
yeah, right. Citing from the bible is a very solid argument. I could also cite Darwin just to look smart.
405mikey91 2 years ago 23
well said biomanwin! and smith13457 cant find a peer reviewed artical cause their are NONE, 100% fact. it should be called the law of evolution but that will never happen because of ignorant brainwashed closed minded people like smith and his "many scientists" FOOL you got that right
dompeeeee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Correct science is not faith based.
Evolution is faith based.
If you are genuinely looking for an answer to your question,read the first book of the bible genesis.
We should thank God for all things,sin death and suffering,are the results of man,s pride rebellion.
smith13457 2 years ago
Yet in any other arena, had I asked you if it was right and just that a child should pay for the crimes of its parent, you would certainly say no.
I didnt eat any apple, yet I am supposedly burdened by an inherited crime against God?
Wheres the "free will" in that??
manchester26m 2 years ago
You are an ignorant sack of biblical bullshit. Either that or you are deliberately lying, which is worse. Either way evolution is supported by mounds of evidence, morphology, geology, genetics, palentology, anthropology, chemistry, paleobiology, biochemistry, cellular biology, microbiology, and zoology. Just to name a few. If you think you are smarter than all the doctorate holding scientists in these disciplines nominate yourself for a nobel prize you ignorant fool.
biomanwin 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dont think im smarter than any doctorate holding scientists.But i know God is,and i believe his word.Their are many scientists who dont believe in evolution,and its not suprising why.
Everytime someone disagrees with you guys,its always the same,abusive responses.
Thinking a person is an ignorant fool,because he believes this universe in all its complexity requires a creator,is foolish.
I suppose Sir isaac newton was a fool aswell.
Anyway good luck,i hope you find Jesus.
smith13457 2 years ago
I was brought up Catholic, so i know full well about jesus and have concluded that religion is an imaginary friend for adults. Also your point about Sir Isaac Newton is completely irrelivant as he died BEFORE Darwin published the Origin of Species, so how could he possibly have agreed with it. Name one respectable scientist who disagrees with the evidence from all the scientific disciplines I mentioned. Or show me one peer reviewed paper supporting Intelligent Design. Your Call.
biomanwin 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You were brought up a catholic biomanwin,but you see one must be bornagain by the spirit of God.John3:3
Answers in genesis has a list on their website,700 names of young earth creation scientists.But thats irrelivant,in the past the mojority has often been wrong.There are no scientists who disagree with any scientific disciplines,the point your missing is Evolution=the atheistic religion,Genetic mutations do not cause an increase of information in the genome needed for macroe evolution.
smith13457 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I wish you guys would seek God and stop apposing him,God can be found. He gives the holyspirit to all who repent and trust in Jesus.
What a claim to make,everyone reading this comment,can receive and have a PERSONAL relationship with God for themselves.
Romans10:13 Whosoever shall call apon the name of the LORD shall be saved.
Evolution will deceive you.You have to give God the glory for he,s done.
How do know there,s a God???
Obey the scripture,and receive his life today.
God bless
smith13457 2 years ago
I am going to ask a very serious question, how can a theory, with mounds of evidence at that, decieve me? A theory is not an entity, just an explanation for the evidence we see around us. Therefore a theory cannot decieve anyone, new evidence can just change theories.
biomanwin 2 years ago 23
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We have the same evidence whether creationist or evolutionist.I believe the evidence supports creation,you obviously disagree.Its not going to be settled by me or you.
Jeremiah 33:3 Call to me,and i will answer you,and show you great and mighty things,which you do not know.
Thats a promise from God,to us all.
People dont understand they can approach God for themselves.
I dont have all truth,or claim to.
God does,call unto him,its his promise that he will answer not mine.
God bless
smith13457 2 years ago
Ah, but it was men in their imperfection that formed said theory, they can certainly decieve you!
AGiantBunny 2 years ago
Yes, people can decieve me, but it would take some pretty convincing false evidence to fool the entire scientific community for a century and a half.
biomanwin 2 years ago 2
And men long ago wrote a book that contains untestable assertions. Indeed human kind can be deceptive and write deceptive things too.
TheNewRenaissance 2 years ago
@biomanwin But who created theories? Huh huh!?!?! God that's who.... Oh, it wasn't God, my bad...
cycodevilboy 1 year ago
Are you serious? The GREAT majority of the scientific community consider evolution as a FACT, they may disagree on wether or not natural selection is the only factor for the diversity of life, but evolution has mounds of evidence from way to many fields of science and has actually been seen on the laboratory, search for e.coli evolution, even the most religious scientist can't deny evolution, stop spreading bullshit like the false idea that there's a split concensus.
ArmandoXIII 2 years ago 2
Fascinating.. I love Attenborough
GUAlliance 2 years ago
Jesus fucking Christ, there are transitional fossils every fucking where you look. Try the Museum of Natural History for example, damn it.
ubcphysicsyangbo 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I recently read a large article in new scientist magazine,showing that darwin was wrong about the tree of life.
This is unbelivable.
smith13457 2 years ago
well and what's your alternative? How do you support that idea?
I'm very interested by the subject.
405mikey91 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My alternative is God created all life.
My belief is faith based,as is evolution,but they wont admit it.However there is evidence to support creation,Irreducible complexity being one example,please research.
The article i read about the tree of life,was in the january 21st edition of new scientist,why darwin was wrong about the tree of life.
You can read the article online,just google it.
God bless
smith13457 2 years ago
well, I have many questions, but there is one. How do you explain the many skeletons and fossils of humanoids in diffrent stages of evolution that were found? If there wasn't any evolution how did they get there? God put them there to test our faith? I mean, c'mon....
405mikey91 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You responded immediately,so obviously you never read the article or researched about irreducible complexity.You gave me no answer,the replied with a question.There aren,t any transitional fossils,the few they present are highly debatible,this is why evolutionists such as steven gould are now admitting,the itermediates dont exist,are are inventing new theores such as punctuated equilibria.
Mikey if God exists,would you like to him?
smith13457 2 years ago
ok, I'm gonna do the reasearch and by the way, I've been tryin' all my life to find proof that god exists, beacause that would make things much easier. I do have a perception of god, but I am not religious.
405mikey91 2 years ago
If God exists would you like to know him?
I apologise for the missing word in my last message.
smith13457 2 years ago
I'd love to. As every huamn being I am striving for absolute and infinity, and I think religion takes advantage of just that. So again, I don't think any religion has the answer as they are so human-like, nothing absolute about them. But that doesn't mean there is no god, regardless of how you perceive it.
405mikey91 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your correct mikey,dont look to religion.
The God of the bible claims,many times that he loves his creation,and can be found.
Romans 10:13 Whosoever shall call apon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Dont be influenced by any religious idea or theory or any man,simply ask Jesus to forgive your sins,and to come into your life.
Its his promise he will,God is only found through faith,and head knowledge,1corithians1:21.
Let me know when you find Jesus,hes only a prayer away.
God bless
smith13457 2 years ago
God is only found through faith,and NOT head knowledge.
again forgive me for missing a word.
God hates religion,he wants relationship,he wants to be called father.
Your welcome to disagree with me,but this is my heart,that everyone be saved through the love and mercy of our creator.
God bless
smith13457 2 years ago
The New Scientist article you refer to basically says that Darwin was wrong because they've discovered that it's not a "Tree of Life" but more a "Web of Life".
The article does nothing to say that evolution doesn't occur. In fact, it just means that evolution is more complex then Darwin originally envisioned.
You know nothing about what you're saying, sorry but to be blunt you're extremely ignorant if you think we don't have transitional fossils.
Domidoolalala 2 years ago 5
@405mikey91:
smith13457 is quote minig the New Scientist article. Please read my response to him (a quote from New Scientist online.
Best0fScience 2 years ago
"As we celebrate the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth, we await a third revolution that will see biology changed and strengthened.
None of this should give succour to creationists, whose blinkered universe is doubtless already buzzing with the news that 'New Scientist has announced Darwin was wrong'".
Best0fScience 2 years ago 2
Expect to find excerpts ripped out of context and presented as evidence that biologists are deserting the theory of evolution en masse. They are not."
New Scientist Online ("Editorial: Uprooting Darwin's tree ")
Best0fScience 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very cool video.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
WHICH CAME FIRST,THE HEN OR THE EGG?
moorekwesi 2 years ago
shit! obviously that sould have been "use"
DrawingYou 2 years ago
What evidence? The only evidence I've seen creationists us is the lack of evidence (we don't know so god did it.)
DrawingYou 2 years ago
Creationism is willful stupidity.
devourerofbabies 2 years ago 2
Not when you look at creationism along with evolution together. The true stupidity is ignoring all other theories as bogus.
langerCAN 2 years ago
That's because they are bogus. Creationism is simply trying to fit in anywhere it can. It's quite conveinent when you have a bogus idea that's not founded on logic. You can always wait for new evidence to come out and then say, "well, god created man that way then...."
capitalcontested 2 years ago
capitalcontested, so are written reports taken as evidence as well, courts do it all the time, and some of those judges are atheist. Archeology also goes on material evidence & supports some of the biblical history. So like i said again. Everything just ' is ' or ' exists ', the rest is human perception. Both atheism & theism are psycholical conditions as well as emotional conditions ( professor Paul.C.Vitz....the professor is qualified to say so).
shelley0809 2 years ago
And Gigantism, average(s) & Dwarfism's. Robert Wadlow, Sandy & others. The real life thumbelina, also tribes with pigmies ( all homo sapiens ) that is a sceintific evidence to refute Darwin's Belief's & those that joined the atheist band in the ' evolution ' with searching for a bigger skull for a bigger brain in the transition, sorry that's a belief still. Also humans have come with 5 fingers & 1 thumb ( total: 6) and also 6 toes, there are many cases today of this.
shelley0809 2 years ago
Paul C. Vitz may be qualified to give his opinion, but that's about it. He's a "christian" psychologist. So, not surprisingly, he's one of those few academics that theist can camp around, but who has no real weight in the academic world. Atheism is simply the condition of being without postualating any supernatural beliefs. I'm an anti-theist, because I think that theist have a very, very weak argument(s). So, take your pseudo-psychologist to church with you, cuz I don't buy it.
capitalcontested 2 years ago
I invite you to explain how a group of chemicals simply up and began to display signs of life, acting on their own, and creating replicateable cells. Technically, shouldn't we then be able to do the same with technology? Create life from materials without using existing forms of life?
Only when you can accomplish that will Creationism be a void argument.
langerCAN 2 years ago
The burden of proof is on you, for stating that there is a god. Science can demonstratably proof now, more than enough to disprove any holy book. Just because your cults give you weak answers, doesn't mean that they are in any way correct. So, christian creationism is just as weak of an argument as if I were to argue that man was made by the earth rotating around the sun, just the right amount of times, until we hatched out of the trees.... actually, that's a better argument than creationism.
capitalcontested 2 years ago
capitolcontested, you are welcome to your belief, Paul C Vitz was also an atheist & took his study on this as an atheist, so whilst he was an atheist he came to the conclusion that i told you about, it was then from this conclusion that he became christian. But it is correct affirmation in Psychology, as psychologists cross-reference these subjects.
As for the rest i do not understand your perception & not about to do an analysis about you. Enjoy the video & wish you all the best.
shelley0809 2 years ago
The field of psychology is a science, but his beliefs aren't part of the academic priciples of psychology. They are part of his personally published work. I'm not going to read in any academic guide of psychology that his beliefs on theism and atheism are taken to be what modern psychologist think. It's to subjective, and he can't back it up with research. I also see on your page that you're a fan of the 'Obama deception', so I won't burden you with the idea of proof. I also wish you well.
capitalcontested 2 years ago 2
capitalcontested,
Like i said, your'e very welcome to what you wish to believe.
shelley0809 2 years ago
Ok, if you're so understanding to others 'beliefs'(reason), than why argue against evolution on a Darwin video? either way...
capitalcontested 2 years ago
capitalcontested,
The fact is a do reason & by my comments about Darwin's origin of species about evolutionists searching for a bigger skull for such a link is silly, when we have had a lot of cases in ' i repeat ' gigantism ( Robert Wadlow) and Dwarfism's ( the real life thumbelina) and such little people as pigmies. Also people with 6 toes & 6 fingers etc. That is by reason & also Proof.
shelley0809 2 years ago
Nobody said that I was in a cult receiving weak answers. I also never said I was a christian. I am simply stating that the idea that an entity external to ourselves may have been responsible for instilling life in what would otherwise be a ball of matter. The "proof" is not found in science, which you failed to acknowledge, making you ignorant. But the proof is also not explained by religion.
In this way, both theories must be taken as equal.
langerCAN 2 years ago
Your problem is that you are taking other people's assumptions, and making your own assumptions, which you claim to be correct. I am in no way saying that either belief is right or wrong, I am simply saying that you cannot be truly knowledgeable on this subject without recognizing both scenarios.
langerCAN 2 years ago
I'm not completley discrediting creationism. I'm saying science backs up the answers that it does give, and it activily seeks to discover more. It's not a 50/50 issue. The argument for creationims, while an argument, is very weak. It does not have a strong foundation. yes, it's an argument, but I don't think it's a good argument.
capitalcontested 2 years ago
Alright, but you should also look into creationism a bit more. You might be surprised at the number of scientific (Not church funded) papers that support that belief. I'm really 50/50 on the issue, though.
langerCAN 2 years ago
I've seen much of the science that backs it. But, they usually back it on a hypothetical scenario not involving a grand creator. I've never heard of any argument that could hope to make it a 50/50 scenario. Yes, they provide two possible answers, that does not mean that they have an equall propability of being true. People can believe in what they wish, but if they want to argue that their belief is right, then they need to support the case. That's why evolution pushed creationism the side.
capitalcontested 2 years ago
Ok. I decided to indulge you and look at your other comments.
You are still and idiot.
We can and have already created technology that can replicate and act on it's own. We can also do this with synthetic chemicals.
Creationism is now a void argument.
Goodbye
normskis69 2 years ago
Only through modification of existing species. Therefore, the argument still stands.
langerCAN 2 years ago
No it doesn't. Do some research and stop masking your ignorance with your creationist babble.
You don't have an argument.
That's all I have to say on the matter.
normskis69 2 years ago
I've done research. I'm in school for biology, thank you. You might want to be the one to do more research, and I'm not just talking about searching the internet.
langerCAN 2 years ago
Creationism is not a theory.
devourerofbabies 2 years ago 2
what is it then? it is a theory for your information, since it cannot be proven nor disproven. I personally believe in a form of creationism, but I recognize that it is not simply a belief.
langerCAN 2 years ago
Idiot.
You don't know what scientific theory is...
normskis69 2 years ago 2
Are you serious? Do we have to have this debate? Just look at the rest of the comments, man. You'll see that not only am I an idiot, but you'll look more like one the further you read.
langerCAN 2 years ago
I'd say your comments make more sense to me, than this Darwin ' evolution ' theory of searching for a bigger skull to house a bigger brain as a ' missing link ' with the all shapes & sizes we have from Gigantism to Dwarfism's in people, plus the toes & fingers that come in sixes with some ( Anne Bolyen being a famous case), but there are people with all 6's on all parts, both hands and both feet.
shelley0809 2 years ago
Theories can very much be disproven. Learn 2 science.
devourerofbabies 2 years ago
They CAN be disproven, but that does not automatically make them false. Also, that has nothing to do with your initial comment. And it is simply an obvious statement.
Also, the proper internet meme would be "lern 2 science"
langerCAN 2 years ago
I was just responding to what you wrote. Do you pay any attention to what you say? It doesn't seem you do.
devourerofbabies 2 years ago
Your comment had little to do with anything.
langerCAN 2 years ago
You brain has little to do with anything if you think creationism is a theory.
devourerofbabies 2 years ago
How is it not a theory? You haven't made a single valid point. You're just trolling because you know you have no argument.
langerCAN 2 years ago
Theories are frameworks of ideas which explain facts and make testable predictions. If facts are uncovered that clash with the theory, then the theory is re-formulated.
Creationism is belief in an ancient storybook. It has no predictive power and the only explanatory power it has is GODDIDIT. Only facts that agree with creationism are aknowledged.
They are polar opposites.
devourerofbabies 2 years ago
creationism is religion with a modern twist to try and get back into our society since religion and state should be separate... in the world of science it would be called a hypothesis and untested and unproven idea.. not a scientific theory which has to be tested and proven
EternalApostasy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't believe in evolution or creationism, i think they are as bad as each other. We just ' are '. As the scientists involved with evolution were searching for the ' missing link ' in the string of man witha ' bigger brain ' they figured, the fact is homo sapiens come in all shpes and sizes, gigantism, average & dwarfism. Creationists explaination is just ' silly '. Creationism & evolution are as bad as each other & those who contend either one against the other. We will never know exactly.
shelley0809 2 years ago
I totally agree with you. And also I don't believe the earth is either flat or spherical. In the end the two different opinions are probably just the result of an optical illusion, so both sides are just as bad and should accept that we'll never know anything and everyone who tries to understand anything is just wasting their time.
hennybonny 2 years ago
hennybonny, i couldn't agree more with you at all. it boils down to both sides having a human perspective & imagination ( theory) with it. None of us in the present will ever be able to make a claim as a ' first-hand witness', i didn't even exist when my great-grandmother was alive & kicking!
Still, humans need the release every now & then from ' reality ' & the present.
shelley0809 2 years ago
Darwinism is a Belief.
shelley0809 2 years ago
Depends on how you're looking at it.
langerCAN 2 years ago
Ah yes, everything just ' is ' or ' exists ' the rest is human perception, in the collective of the ' Human state '.
shelley0809 2 years ago
There's no such thing as Darwinism
devourerofbabies 2 years ago 4
It's a belief founded on scientific evidence, not an illogical holy book(s).
capitalcontested 2 years ago
This guy acts like William Shatner :)
c6gunner 2 years ago
that's actually pretty funny.
anarchycastro 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a lovely "Disney style" fairy tale. "In a land long ago and far away...." Darwin wasn't a scientist and this video is pseudo- science. This video leaves thousands of questions unanswered with all of it's baseless, unscientific assumptions. Historians disagree about events that happened hundreds of years ago yet some claim to know what took place BILLIONS of years ago? I'm not buying this garbage.
indyeight 2 years ago
99.8% of scientists would disagree with you.. four times more scientists believe the holocaust didn't happen than refute evolution.. youtube carl sagan's COSMOS on evolution. great series even for dimwits.. I would also bet you believe in a few fairy tales yourself sir
ebizl8 2 years ago 10
History is a subjective area of study. Science is not. If you act on an atom the same way under the same conditions, that atom will always do the same thing. Besides, one doesn't need to look back billions of years; evolution has been unmistakably observed. As for its being a Disney-style fairy tale, how so? Countless species suffered and went extinct over billions of years of evolution. The species we see today don't comprise the tiniest fraction of all the species that have ever lived.
Joerexia 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
History is a collection of FACTS about past events. Science is not subjective but this video is VERY subjective since the information is pure fantasy and has never been observed in any laboratory. The variations among species that are observed today have definite LIMITATIONS. The video presents variation without limitations which is not observable and repeatable science.
indyeight 2 years ago
"Science is not subjective but this video is VERY subjective since the information is pure fantasy and has never been observed in any laboratory"
Don't be an idiot. Science isn't limited to merely what can be observed in a laboratory. If it were, we never would have developed atomic theory, let alone the resources and technology required to take us to the moon. Your ignorance of the scientific process doesn't qualify you to wax philosophical about the failings of evolutionary theory.
c6gunner 2 years ago
Much of what we know about certain historical epochs has been derived from finding scraps of documents here and stone tablets there and ruined buildings elsewhere, that historians have to make sense of as a whole to figure out how everything came to pass - not nearly as cut and dry as you seem to suggest. The remains of prehistoric creatures count as the "facts" in the sense that you use the word, which have to be understood as a whole to figure out how everything came to pass biologically.
UppruniTegundanna 2 years ago
"What a lovely "Disney style" fairy tale."
you're talking about god right?
although if you read the bible, it's not so "fairytale"
more like "fear-a-tale".
That god guy is one mean asshole.
anarchycastro 2 years ago 2
oky indy can you do any better, ohhh let me guess, in the beginning, man created god!!!
athiestcrusader 2 years ago
JUST beautiful indeed....I enjoyed watching this ...loved thIS video....thank you again for posting ;o)
kissmytwinkys 2 years ago 3
Evolution wins
Creationism fails
DarthHuru 2 years ago 11
wow, beautiful
warvaldance 2 years ago 7
hm...just thought of something...Are there any airborne creatures that are not classified as birds? I can only think of flying squirrels, but they're more gliding than flying.
Of course I completely forgot about insects...d'oh. :)
Ok, aside from birds, insect